Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vh8gq Total loading time: 0.701 Render date: 2022-10-05T02:13:50.583Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

12 - Economic Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Shareen Hertel
University of Connecticut
Lanse Minkler
University of Connecticut
Sigrun I. Skogly
Reader in Human Rights Law, Lancaster University
Mark Gibney
Belk Distinguished Professor, University of North Carolina-Asheville
Get access



One of the great disappointments concerning human rights is the way in which these rights are declared to be “universal,” at the same time that the protection of those rights (and even responsibility for the commission of human rights violations) has been severely limited by territorial considerations. In this chapter, we argue that this is an unfortunate misreading of international human rights law. A person's home state is certainly the first place to look to in terms of the protection of economic rights – and all other human rights as well. This point is not being challenged. What is being challenged is the refusal to look any further than this, notwithstanding the dictates of international human rights law.

The term “extraterritorial” effect/application/obligation in international law refers to acts that are taken by one actor (state) that have some kind of effect within another country's territory with or without this second country's implicit or explicit agreement. Extraterritoriality within international human rights law, then, concerns actions or omissions by one state that have an effect on the human rights of individuals in another state – with or without this other state's agreement. This effect may be positive or negative, in that such actions or omissions by foreign states may contribute positively to the enjoyment of human rights; or alternatively, they may result in a deteriorated human rights situation, and even human rights violations.

Economic Rights
Conceptual, Measurement, and Policy Issues
, pp. 267 - 283
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Altiparmak, Kerem. 2004. Bankovic: An Obstacle to the Application of the European Convention on Human Rights in Iraq? Journal of Conflict and Security Law 9: 213–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakirci, Hasan. 2005. Extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights. Master's Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Bankovic v. Belgium, App. No. 52207/99, European Court of Human Rights (2001) (admissibility).
Bueno, Mesquita. 2003. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Obligations of International Assistance and Cooperation. Senior Research Officer, Human Rights Centre, University of Essex (briefing paper).Google Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1997. General Comment No. 8: The Relationship between Economic Sanctions and Respect for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. U.N. Doc E/C.12/1997/8 (12 Dec.).
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1999. General Comment No. 12: The Right to Adequate Food (Art. 11). U.N. Doc E/C.12/1999/5 (12 May).
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2000. General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. U.N. Doc E/C.12/2000/4 (11 Aug.).
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2003. Concluding Observations. U.N. Doc E/C.12/1/Add.90 (23 May).
Eide, Asbj⊘rn. 1989. Realization of Social and Economic Rights and the Minimum Threshold Approach. Human Rights Law Journal 10: 35–51.Google Scholar
Happold, Matthew. 2003. Bankovic v. Belgium and the Territorial Scope of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 3: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Court of Justice. Military and Paramilitary Activities (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1986 I.C.J. (June 27).
Ireland v. United Kingdom, App. No. 5310/71, European Court of Human Rights (1978).
Nahapetian, Kate. 2002. Confronting State Complicity in International Law. UCLA Journal of Law and Foreign Affairs 7: 99–127.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred. 1997. The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In An Introduction to the International Protection of Human Rights, ed. Hanski, Raija and Suksi, Markku. Åbo, Finland: Institute for Human Rights, Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 2003. Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law 14: 529–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of American States. 1978. American Convention on Human Rights. O.A.S. Treaty Series No. 36, 1144 U.N.T.S. 123.
Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004).
Roxstrom, Erik, Gibney, Mark, and Einarsen, Terje. 2005. The NATO Bombing Case [Bankovic et al. v. Belgium et al.] and the Limits of Western Human Rights Protection. Boston University Journal of International Law 23: 55–136.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Leonard S. 2004. How International Human Rights Organizations Can Advance Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: A Response to Kenneth Roth. Human Rights Quarterly 26: 845–65 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry. 1980. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry. 1988. Mediating Duties. Ethics 98: 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Brunoed, ed. 1994. The Charter of the United Nations – A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Skogly, Sigrun. 2001. The Human Rights Obligations of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. London: Cavendish Press.Google Scholar
Skogly, Sigrun. 2003. The Obligation of International Assistance and Co-Operation in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden, ed. Bergsmo, Morten. Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Skogly, Sigrun. 2006. Beyond National Borders: Human Rights Obligations of States in International Cooperation. Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1951. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/L.19/Add.6 (May 11).
United Nations. 1965. G.A., 3d Comm., 17th Sess., 1204th mtg., Official Records ¶ 49.
United Nations. 2000. Millennium Declaration. U.N. Doc. A/RES/55/2 (18 Sept.).
UN Centre for Human Rights. Legislative History of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1978–1989). Article 4 – Implementation of Rights, HR/1995/Ser.1/article. 4.
UN Human Rights Committee. 1981. Lopes v. Uruguay, U.N. Doc. A/36/40 (July 29).
UN Commission on Human Rights. 2005. The Right to Food. Report by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Jean Ziegler, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/47 (24 January).
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats