Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:55:36.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Sustaining industrial activity and ecological quality: the potential role of an ecosystem services approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Lorraine Maltby
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Achim Paetzold
Affiliation:
Catchment Science Centre, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Philip Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Lesley C. Batty
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Kevin B. Hallberg
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Bangor
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Modern societies benefit greatly from the products of industry and ecosystems provide the raw materials and energy required to produce them. Societies also benefit from a wide range of other ecosystem services including the supply of food, fuel, fibre and water, the regulation of disease and climate, recreational opportunities and aesthetic enjoyment. However, there is a potential conflict between these two types of benefits as increased industrialisation is often associated with increased release of hazardous chemicals or habitat modification, which have the potential to degrade ecosystem services, including those required for continued industrial production and development.

Here we consider the relationship between industrialisation and environmental impact using the development of Sheffield's metal industries as a case study. We then go on to explore the broader question of ecological quality and how it is defined, before outlining a quality assessment framework based on ecosystem services that may provide a tool for managing ecosystems for the optimal delivery of services. Finally, we consider the global aspects of economic development, industrialisation and environmental degradation.

Environmental impacts of industry: Sheffield metal industries and the River Don

Sheffield is synonymous with steel and metal has been worked here since at least the Middle Ages. Early metal workers capitalised on the environmental resources provided by the region: fast flowing rivers for water power, oak woodlands for charcoal, iron ore for smelting and grit stone for grinding. Later the locally abundant coal became an important source of power.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amisah, S. and Cowx, I. G. (2000a) Impacts of abandoned mine and industrial discharges on fish abundance and macroinvertebrate diversity of the upper River Don in South Yorkshire, UK. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amisah, S. and Cowx, I. G. (2000b) Response of the fish population of the River Don, South Yorkshire to water quality and habitat improvements. Environmental Pollution 108, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angermeier, P. L. (2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conservation Biology 14, 372–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, E. A. (1997) The effects of metals on stream benthic algal communities. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
Bermingham, S., Maltby, L. and Cooke, R. C. (1996) Effects of coal mine effluent on aquatic hyphomycetes I. Field study. Journal of Applied Ecology 33, 1311–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunn, S. E. and Davies, P. M. (2000) Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assesssment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia 422/423, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calow, P. (2000) Critics of ecosystem health misrepresented. Ecosystem Health 6, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, L. A. and Blomquist, G. C. (2008) Environmental policy in the European Union: fostering the development of pollution havens?Ecological Economics 65, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. A. (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics 48, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constanza, R. and Mageau, M. (1999) What is a healthy ecosystem?Aquatic Ecology 33, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constanza, R., D'Arge, R., Groot, R. S.et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiGaetano, A. and Lawless, P. (1999) Urban governance and industrial decline. Governing structures and policy agendas in Birmingham and Sheffield, England, and Detroit, Michigan, 1980–1997. Urban Affairs Review 34, 546–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, C. J. (1997) Domesday to the Dawn of the New Millennium: 900 years of the Don FisheryEnvironment Agency, UK.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B.et al. (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35, 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyfogle, E. T. and Lutz Newton, J. (2001) Putting science in its place. Conservation Biology 16, 863–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, O. L. (1990) Wild figs by the River Don, Sheffield. Watsonia 18, 84–85.Google Scholar
Gillson, L. and Willis, K. J. (2004) ‘As Earth's testimonies tell’: wilderness conservation in a changing world. Ecology Letters 7, 990–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, H. A. (1997) Origin and development of the Biological Monitoring Working Party score system. Water Research 32, 964–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, S. M., Maltby, L., Paetzold, A. and Phillips, D. (2007) Getting a measure of nature: cultures and values in an ecosystem services approach. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. (1996) Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: are human activities natural?Conservation Biology 10, 695–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R. and Boucher, T. (2007) Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316, 1866–1869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karr, J. R. (1991) Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecological Applications 1, 66–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karr, J. D. (1999) Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biology 41, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, J. R. and Chu, E. W. (2000) Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia 422/423, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, J. R. and Dudley, D. R. (1981) Ecological perspectives on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, R. T. (2001) Values, policy, and ecosystem health. BioScience 51, 437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, M and Wheeler, D. (1998) In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. Journal of Environment and Development 7, 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. L. (1997) Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Milner, A. M., Conn, S. C. and Brown, L. E. (2006) Persistence and stability of macroinvertebrate communities in streams of Denali National Park, Alaska: implications for biological monitoring. Freshwater Biology 51, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, C., Jansson, R., Malmqvist, B. and Naiman, R. J. (2007) Restoring riverine landscapes: the challenge of identifying priorities, reference states, and techniques. Ecology and Society 12, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss11/art16/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M., Bernhardt, E., Chornesky, E.et al. (2004) Ecology of a crowded planet. Science 304, 1251–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, S. T. A. and Ostfeld, R. S. (1995) The shifting paradigm in ecology. In: A New Century of Natural Resource Management (eds. Knight, R. L. and Bates, S. F.), pp. 261–277. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapport, D. J., Boehm, G., Buckingham, D.et al. (1999) Ecosystem health: the concept, the ISEH, and the important tasks ahead. Ecosystem Health 5, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapport, D. J., Constanza, R. and McMichael, A. J. (1998) Assessing ecosystem health. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, J. P., Beard, T. D., Bennett, E. M.et al. (2006) ‘Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/ art28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, R. J. and Biggs, R. (2005) A biodiversity intactness index. Nature 434, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scrimgeour, G. J. and Wicklum, D. (1996) Aquatic ecosystem health and integrity: problems and potential solutions. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15, 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swetnam, T. W., Allen, C. D. and Betancourt, J. L. (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage the future. Ecological Applications 9, 1189–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedale, G. (1995) Steel City. Entrepreneurship, Strategy and Technology in Sheffield 1743–1993. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UKTAG. (2007) Recommendations on Surface Water Classification Scheme for the purposes of the Water Framework Directive. http://www.wfduk.org/UKCLASSPUB/ LibraryPublicDocs/sw_status_classification.
,UNDESA-DSD. (2006) Trends in Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York.
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J. M. (1997) Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. and Kinzig, A. (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, N., Hawkins, B. and Giles, C. (2001) ‘One Great Workshop’: The Buildings of the Sheffield Metal Trades. English Heritage, UK.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×