Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-t82dr Total loading time: 0.472 Render date: 2021-12-06T21:49:29.186Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Chapter 17 - Anoas Bubalus depressicornis (C. H. Smith, 1827); Bubalus quarlesi (Ouwens, 1910)

from Part III - Species accounts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Philip M. Wheeler
Affiliation:
University of Hull Scarborough Campus
Abdul Haris Mustari
Affiliation:
Bogor Agricultural University
James Burton
Affiliation:
Senior Research Manager (Oman) at Earthwatch Institute
Get access

Summary

Taxonomy

The taxonomy of the anoas is uncertain and has been the cause of much debate (summarised by Burton et al. 2005), largely because of the substantial morphological and genetic variation displayed by wild and captive individuals. There is consistent agreement among authors since Groves (1969) that anoas should be regarded as members of the genus Bubalus. The subgenus Anoa has been proposed to clearly separate the anoas as distinct from other members of Bubalus, although it is not considered that there is adequate support for Anoa as a genus in its own right (Hollister 1919; Groves 1969). Currently accepted taxonomy recognises two species (Burton et al. 2005; Grubb 2005), ‘lowland’ and ‘mountain’, but past taxonomies have proposed both a single species and three or more species (e.g. Dolan 1965; Groves 1969). Recent studies have indicated that the genetic basis for the two species split is not strong, and that there may be greater support for distinct races or subspecies separated geographically (Mustari et al. 2012). It is relevant to note that the Indonesian National Action Plan for Anoas (Mustari et al. in press) was based on the identification of priority regions relating to putative genetically distinct geographically separated populations rather than known ranges of the two currently recognised species. These questions require significant further investigation in order to confirm what constitutes evolutionarily significant units for anoa, but until they are resolved there is no strong basis on which to abandon the two-species classification.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour of Wild Cattle
Implications for Conservation
, pp. 302 - 309
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burton, J. A. & MacDonald, A. A. (2009). Variation in distribution and abundance of large mammals in Lore Lindu National park, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Malayan Nature Journal 61: 295–305.Google Scholar
Burton, J. A., Hedges, S. & Mustari, A. H. (2005). The taxonomic status, distribution and conservation of the lowland anoa Bubalus depressicornis and mountain anoa Bubalus quarlesi. Mammal Review 35: 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, H. C., Summers, M., Harting, J. R. & Kessler, P. J. A. (2007). Developing conservation priorities based on forest type, condition, and threats in a poorly known ecoregion: Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biotropica 39: 747–759.Google Scholar
Clauss, M., Reese, S. & Eulenberger, K. (2009). Macroscopic digestive anatomy of a captive lowland anoa (Bubalus depressicornis). Zoo animal nutrition 4: 257–265.Google Scholar
Dolan, J. (1965). Breeding of the lowland anoa, Bubalus (Anoa) d. depressicornis (H. Smith, 1927) in the San Diego Zoological Garden. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 30: 241–248.Google Scholar
Dwiyahreni, A. A. (2006). Anoa abundance in the Lambusango forests and the influencing factors. Report to BKSDA Southeast Sulawesi, Kendari.
Feer, F. (1994). Observations éthologiques sur Bubalus (Anoa) quarlesi Ouwens, 1910 (Ruminantia, Bovidae) en captivité. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 59: 139–152.Google Scholar
Flores-Miyamoto, K., Clauss, M., Ortmann, S. & Sainsbury, A. W. (2005). Nutrition of captive lowland anoa (Bubalus depressicornis): a study on ingesta passage, intake, digestibility, and a diet survey. Zoo Biology 24: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foead, N. (1992). Foead, N. 1992. Studi Habitat Dan Pakan Anoa Gunung [Bubalus (Anoa) Quarlesi, Ouwen] Di Taman Nasional Lore Lindu, Sulawesi Tengah. Unpublished MSc thesis. Fakultas Kehutanan, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Groves, C. P. (1969). Systematics of the anoa (Mammalia, Bovidae). Beaufortia 17: 1–12.Google Scholar
Grubb, P. (2005). Order Artiodactyla. In Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, pp. 637–722. 3rd edition. Eds. Wilson, D. E. and Reeder, D. M.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, S. (1996). Anoas Bubalus depressicornis and Bubalus quarlesi: Asian Wild Cattle and Buffaloes. Status Report and Conservation Action Plan. Gland: IUCN/SSC Asian Wild Cattle Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Hollister, N. (1919). The generic names Anoa and Bubalus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 32: 45.Google Scholar
Jahja, M. M. (1987). The possibility of breeding anoa in captivity: an alternative for conservation of the species. Biotrop Special Publication 30: 101–108.Google Scholar
Manansang, J., Hedges, S., Dwiatmo, S., Miller, P. & Seal, U. (1996a). Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop for the Anoa (Bubalus depressicornis and Bubalus quarlesi) report. Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop for the Anoa
Manansang, J., Sumampouw, T., Masnur, I. Y., Agustine, N. & Prastiti, S. (1996b). The anoa at Taman Safari Indonesia (TSI). Anoa Species Bubalus quarlesi and Bubalus depressicornis population and habitat viability assessment workshop report Taman Safari Indonesia.
Melisch, R. (1995). Anoa threatened by souvenir trade in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Oryx 29: 224–225.Google Scholar
Mustari, A. H. (1995). Population and behaviour of lowland anoa (Bubalus depressicornis Smith) in Tanjung Amolengu Wildlife Reserve South-East Sulawesi, Indonesia. MSc thesis. George-August University.
Mustari, A. H. (1996). Socio-ecological behaviour of lowland anoa (Bubalus depressicornis Smith) in Tanjung Amolengu wildlife reserve Southeast Sulawesi. Anoa Species Bubalus quarlesi and Bubalus depressicornis Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop report, Taman Safari Indonesia.
Mustari, A. H. (2003). Ecology and conservation of lowland anoa, Bubalus depressicornis, in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of New England.
Mustari, A. H. & Masy’ud, B. (2011). The nutritional requirement of anoa. Media Konservasi, 7.Google Scholar
Mustari, A. H., Burton, J., Rejeki, I. S. & Komara, W. Y. (2012). High Priority Sites for Conservation of Anoa (Bubalus depressicornis and Bubalus quarlesi) in Sulawesi and Buton: Understanding and Sustaining the Biodiversity and Ecosystems of the Wallacea Region for Human Well-being. Makassar: Hasanuddin University.Google Scholar
Mustari, A. H., Burton, J., Santoso, H., et al. (in press). National Strategy and Action Plan for Anoa Conservation (Bubalus depressicornis and Bubalus quarlesi) 2010–2020. Jakarta: Ministry of Forestry.
National Research Council. (1983). Little-known Asian Animals with a Promising Economic Future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nötzold, G. (1999). International Studbook: Anoa, (Bubalus [Anoa] depressicornis Smith, 1827). Germany: Leipzig Zoo.Google Scholar
O’Brien, T. G. & Kinnaird, M. F. (1996). Changing populations of birds and mammals in North Sulawesi. Oryx 30: 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okarda, B. (2010). Potential habitat and spatial distribution of anoa (Bubalus spp.) in Lore Lindu National Park. Unpublished MSc thesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Pujaningsih, R. I., Sutrisno, C. I., Supriondho, Y., et al. (2009). Diet composition of anoa (Bubalus sp.) studied using direct observation and dung analysis method in their habitat. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 34: 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, A. M. & Mustari, A. H. (2002). Studi karakteristik habitat anoa dataran rendah (Bubalus depressicornis, Smith) di pinogu, Taman Nasional Boganinani Wartabone. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bioekologi dan Konservasi Ungulata, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Schreiber, A., Seibold, I., Notzold, G. & Wink, M. (1999). Cytochrome b gene haplotypes characterize chromosomal lineages of anoa, the Sulawesi dwarf buffalo (Bovidae: Bubalus sp.). Journal of Heredity 90: 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semiadi, G., Burton, J., Schreiber, A. & Mustari, A. H. (2008a). Bubalus quarlesi. In IUCN 2012: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. , accessed 1 October 2012.
Semiadi, G., Mannullang, B., Burton, J., Schreiber, A., Mustari, A. H. & The IUCN SSC Asian Wild Cattle Specialist Group. (2008b). Bubalus depressicornis. In IUCN 2012: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. , accessed 1 October 2012.
Syam, A. (1978). Study of Habitats and Population of Anoa (Anoa depressicornis) H. Smith in Mount Tangkoko Batuangus Nature Reserve, North Sulawesi. Bogor: Lembaga Penelitian Hutan.Google Scholar
Wheeler, P. (2004). Estimating anoa abundance. In Monitoring Forest Degradation and Animal Populations in the Forests of Central Buton: Preliminary Results from the Pilot Study, pp. 15–20. Ed. Seymour, A.Old Bolingbroke: Operation Wallacea.Google Scholar
Wheeler, P. M. & Dwiyahreni, A. A. (2010). Documenting the Decline of the Anoa on Buton: Implications for Conservation. Bali: Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.Google Scholar
Wheeler, P. M., Purwanto, E., Coles, T., et al. (2009). State of the Lambusango Forests 2008. Old Bolingbroke: Operation Wallacea.Google Scholar
Whitten, A. J., Mustafa, M. & Henderson, G. S. (2002). The Ecology of Sulawesi. Hong Kong: Periplus Editions.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E. & Mittermeier, R. A. (2011). Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 2. Hoofed Mammals. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×