Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-11T21:01:04.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 9 - Co-Morbidities during Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The EBCOG Postgraduate Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Obstetrics & Maternal-Fetal Medicine
, pp. 587 - 627
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Yang, KY. Abnormal pap smear and cervical cancer in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:838–48.Google Scholar
Massad, LS, Einstein, MH, Huh, WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17:S127. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318287d329Google Scholar
Broderick, D, Matityahu, D, Dudhbhai, M, et al. Histologic and colposcopic correlates of ASCUS Pap smears in pregnancy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2002;6:116–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, CY, Smith, HO. Cervical neoplasia complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;32:533–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2005.08.007Google Scholar
Van Calsteren, K, Vergote, I, Amant, F. Cervical neoplasia during pregnancy: Diagnosis, management and prognosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19:611–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.03.002Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Esfahani, FM. Pregnancy-related changes: a retrospective review of 278 cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;17:99107.Google Scholar
Public Health England. Programme and Colposcopy Management. Guidelines for commissioners, screening providers and programme managers for NHS cervical screening. 2016.Google Scholar
Economos, K, Perez Veridiano, N, Delke, I, et al. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:915–18.Google Scholar
Baldauf, JJ, Dreyfus, M, Ritter, J. Benefits and risks of directed biopsy in pregnancy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 1997;1:214–20.Google Scholar
Kyrgiou, M, Koliopoulos, G, Martin-Hirsch, P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:489–98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6Google Scholar
Dunn, TS, Ginsburg, V, Wolf, D. Loop-cone cerclage in pregnancy: a 5-year review. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:577–80. doi: 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00395-0Google Scholar
Paraskevaidis, E, Koliopoulos, G, Kalantaridou, S, et al. Management and evolution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy and postpartum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;104:67–9.Google Scholar
Yost, NP, Santoso, JT, McIntire, DD, et al. Postpartum regression rates of antepartum cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:359–62.Google Scholar
Ahdoot, D, Van Nostrand, KM, Nguyen, NJ, et al. The effect of route of delivery on regression of abnormal cervical cytologic findings in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1116–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e210–16. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355Google Scholar
Elliott, P, Coppleson, M, Russell, P, et al. Early invasive (FIGO stage IA) carcinoma of the cervix: a clinico-pathologic study of 476 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000;10:4252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favero, G, Chiantera, V, Oleszczuk, A, et al. Invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy: laparoscopic nodal evaluation before oncologic treatment delay. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;118:123–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.012Google Scholar
Amant, F, Halaska, MJ, Fumagalli, M, et al. Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines of a second international consensus meeting. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:394403. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000062Google Scholar
Berman, ML, Keys, H, Creasman, W, et al. Survival and patterns of recurrence in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). Gynecol Oncol .1984;19:816.Google Scholar
Prem, KA, Makowski, EL, McKelvey, JL. Carcinoma of the cervix associated with pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;95:99108. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(66)90634-XGoogle Scholar
Parasnis, H, Raje, B, Hinduja, IN. Relevance of plasma fibrinogen estimation in obstetric complications. J Postgrad Med. 1992;38:183–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Itsukaichi, M, Kurata, H, Matsushita, M, et al. Stage Ia1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma: conservative management after laser conization with positive margins. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:387–9.Google Scholar
Schmeler, KM, Frumovitz, M, Ramirez, PT. Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: is there a role for less radical surgery? Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:321–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvo, G, Frumovitz, M, Pareja, R, et al. Simple trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy as a viable treatment option in pregnant patients with stage IB1 (≥2 cm) cervical cancer: bridging the gap to fetal viability. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;150:50–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.021Google Scholar
Capilna, ME, Szabo, B, Becsi, J, et al. Radical trachelectomy performed during pregnancy: a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26:758–62. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000655Google Scholar
Takushi, M, Moromizato, H, Sakumoto, K, et al. Management of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix associated with pregnancy: outcome of intentional delay in treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87:185–9.Google Scholar
Morice, P, Uzan, C, Gouy, S, et al. Gynaecological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet. 2012;379:558–69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60829-5Google Scholar
Peccatori, FA, Azim, HA, Orecchia, R, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:vi160–70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt199Google Scholar
Amant, F, Van Calsteren, K, Halaska, MJ, et al. Long-term cognitive and cardiac outcomes after prenatal exposure to chemotherapy in children aged 18 months or older: an observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:256–64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70363-1Google Scholar
Zagouri, F, Sergentanis, TN, Chrysikos, D, et al. Platinum derivatives during pregnancy in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:337–43. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827c5822Google Scholar
Sood, AK, Sorosky, JI, Mayr, N, et al. Cervical cancer diagnosed shortly after pregnancy: prognostic variables and delivery routes. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:832–8.Google Scholar
Van der Vange, N, Weverling, G, Ketting, B, et al. The prognosis of cervical cancer associated with pregnancy: a matched cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:1022–6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00059-ZGoogle Scholar
Van den Broek, NR, Lopes, A, Ansink, A, et al. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix implanting in an episiotomy scar. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;59:297–9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.0025Google Scholar
Pavlidis, N, Pentheroudakis, G. Metastatic involvement of placenta and fetus in pregnant women with cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res Fortschritte Krebsforsch Progres Dans Rech Sur Cancer. 2008;178:183–94.Google Scholar

References

Navrozoglou, I, Vrekoussis, T, Kontostolis, E, et al. Breast cancer during pregnancy: a mini-review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:837–43.Google Scholar
Azim, HA Jr, Del Mastro, L, Scarfone, G, Peccatori, FA. Treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy: regimen selection, pregnancy monitoring and more. Breast. 2011;20:16.Google Scholar
Csonka, Y, Mosimann, A. Familien in der Schweiz – Statistischer Bericht 2017. Neuchâtel: Swiss Federal Statistical Office (Bundesamt für Statistik); 2017.Google Scholar
Cullinane, CA, Lubinski, J, Neuhausen, SL, et al. Effect of pregnancy as a risk factor for breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer. 2005;117:988e91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentini, A, Lubinski, J, Byrski, T, et al.; Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. The impact of pregnancy on breast cancer survival in women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142:177–85.Google Scholar
Framarino-Dei-Malatesta, M, Piccioni, MG, Brunelli, R, et al. Breast cancer during pregnancy: a retrospective study on obstetrical problems and survival. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173:4852.Google Scholar
Bonnier, P, Romain, S, Dilhuydy, JM, et al. Influence of pregnancy on the outcome of breast cancer: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1997;72:720–7.Google Scholar
Shachar, SS, Gallagher, K, McGuire, K, et al. Multidisciplinary management of breast cancer during pregnancy. Oncologist. 2017;22:324–34.Google Scholar
Ring, AE, Smith, IE, Ellis, PA. Breast cancer and pregnancy. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:1855–60.Google Scholar
Rimawi, BH, Green, V, Lindsay, M. Fetal implications of diagnostic radiation exposure during pregnancy: evidence-based recommendations. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59:412–18.Google Scholar
Nicklas, A, Baker, M. Imaging strategies in the pregnant breast cancer patient. Semin Oncol. 2000;27:623–32.Google Scholar
Amant, F, Van Calsteren, K, Halaska, MJ, et al. Long-term cognitive and cardiac outcomes after prenatal exposure to chemotherapy in children aged 18 months or older: an observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:256–64.Google Scholar
Myers, KS, Green, LA, Lebron, L, Morris, EA. Imaging appearance and clinical impact of preoperative breast MRI in pregnancy-associated breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:177–83.Google Scholar
Yang, WT, Dryden, MJ, Gwyn, K, Whitman, GJ, Theriault, R. Imaging of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy. Radiology. 2006;239:5260.Google Scholar
Howard-Anderson, J, Ganz, PA, Bower, JE, Stanton, AL. Quality of life, fertility concerns, and behavioral health outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:386e405.Google Scholar
Gerstl, B, Sullivan, E, Ives, A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after a breast cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:e79-e88.Google Scholar
Gropper, AB, Calvillo, KZ, Dominici, L, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnant women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2506–11.Google Scholar
Michieletto, S, Saibene, T, Evangelista, L, et al. Preliminary monocentric results of biological characteristics of pregnancy associated breast cancer. Breast. 2014;23:1925.Google Scholar
Mazonakis, M, Varveris, H, Damilakis, J, Theoharopoulos, N, Gourtsoyiannis, N. Radiation dose to conceptus resulting from tangential breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55:386–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loibl, S, Schmidt, A, Gentilini, O, et al. Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: adapting recent advances in breast cancer care for pregnant patients. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:1145–53.Google Scholar
Hahn, KM, Johnson, PH, Gordon, N. Treatment of pregnant breast cancer patients and outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero. Cancer. 2006;107:1219–26.Google Scholar
Shalaby, M, Lasheen, SF, Talima, S; 232P. Pregnancy associated breast cancer spotlights. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1.Google Scholar
Gadducci, A, Cosio, S, Fanucchi, A, et al. Chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel for breast cancer during pregnancy: case report and review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:5225–30.Google Scholar
Mir, O, Berveiller, P, Goffinet, F, et al. Taxanes for breast cancer during pregnancy: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:425–6.Google Scholar
Cheung, CY. Vascular endothelial growth factor activation of intramembranous absorption: a critical pathway for amniotic fluid volume regulation. J Soc Gynecol Invest. 2004;11:6374.Google Scholar
Bader, AA, Schlembach, D, Tamussimo, KF, Pristauz, G, Petru, E. Anhydramnios associated with administration of trastuzumab and paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer during pregnancy. Lancet Oncol. 2007 8:7981.Google Scholar
Sekar, R, Stone, PR. Trastuzumab use for metastatic breast cancer in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:507–10.Google Scholar
Shrim, A, Garcia-Bournissen, F, Maxwell, C, Farine, D, Koren, G. Trastuzumab treatment for breast cancer during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:31–2.Google Scholar
Witzel, ID, Müller, V, Harps, E, Janicke, F, Dewit, M. Trastuzumab in pregnancy associated with poor fetal outcome. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:191–2.Google Scholar
Gadducci, A, Cosio, S, Genazzani, AR. Ovarian function and childbearing issues in breast cancer survivors. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23:625–31.Google Scholar
Badawy, A, Elnashar, A, El-Ashry, M, Shahat, M. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage: prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:694–7.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, Z. Endocrine prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure. Future Oncol. 2016;12:1671–4.Google Scholar
Clowse ME, Behera MA, Anders CK, et al. Ovarian preservation by GnRH agonists during chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Mar;18(3):311–19. doi:10.1089/jwh.2008.0857. PMID: 19281314; PMCID: PMC2858300.Google Scholar
Sonmezer, M, Oktay, K. Fertility preservation in young women undergoing breast cancer therapy. Oncologist. 2006;1:422–34.Google Scholar
Beck-Fruchter, R, Weiss, A, Shalev, E. GnRH agonist therapy as ovarian protectants in female patients undergoing chemotherapy: a review of the clinical data. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):553–61.Google Scholar
Gerber, B, Stehle, H, Ricardo, F, et al. ZORO: A prospective randomized multicenter study to prevent chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure with the GnRH-agonist goserelin in young hormone-insensitive breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline containing (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy (GBG 37). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:526.Google Scholar
von Wolff, M, Bruckner, T, Strowitzki, T, Germeyer, A. Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases-an analysis of 992 stimulations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1713–19.Google Scholar
Van der Ven, H, Liebenthron, J, Beckmann, M, et al.; FertiPROTEKT Network. Ninety-five orthotopic transplantations in 74 women of ovarian tissue after cytotoxic treatment in a fertility preservation network: tissue activity, pregnancy and delivery rates. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2031–41.Google Scholar
Brown, RT, Fuemmeler, B, Anderson, D, et al. Adjustment of children and their mothers with breast cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007; Apr;32:297308.Google Scholar

References

Smith, LH, Danielsen, B, Allen, ME, Cress, R. Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;189(4):1128–35.Google Scholar
de Haan, J, Verheecke, M, Van Calsteren, K, et al. Oncological management and obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy: a 20-year international cohort study of 1170 patients. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(3):337–46.Google Scholar
Han, SN, Lotgerink, A, Gziri, MM, et al. Physiologic variations of serum tumor markers in gynecological malignancies during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2012 Aug 8;10:86.Google Scholar
Timmerman, D, Van Calster, B, Testa, A, et al. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):424–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauer, LT, Thornton, RH, Miller, DL, et al. Radiation management for interventions using fluoroscopic or computed tomographic guidance during pregnancy: a joint guideline of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe with Endorsement by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Jan;23(1):1932.Google Scholar
Han, SN, Amant, F, Michielsen, K et al. Feasibility of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of primary tumour, nodal and distant metastases in women with cancer during pregnancy: a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):1862–74.Google Scholar
Ray, JG, Vermeulen, MJ, Bharatha, A, Montanera, WJ, Park, AL. Association between MRI exposure during pregnancy and fetal and childhood outcomes. JAMA. 2016 Sep 6;316(9):952–61.Google Scholar
Committee on Obstetric Practice. Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging during Pregnancy and Lactation, ACOG Committee Opinion No 723. October 2017.Google Scholar
Han, SN, Amant, F, Cardonick, EH, et al. Axillary staging for breast cancer during pregnancy: feasibility and safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;168(2):551–7.Google Scholar
Amant, F, Halaska, MJ, Fumagalli, M, et al. Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines of a second international consensus meeting. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Mar;24(3):394403.Google Scholar
Amant, F, Berveiller, P, Boere, I, et al. Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines based on a third international consensus meeting. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(10):1601–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thrombosis and Embolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium, Reducing the Risk, Green-top Guideline No 37a. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 13 April 2015.Google Scholar
Berveiller, P, Marty, O, Vialard, F, Mir, O. Use of anticancer agents in gynecological oncology during pregnancy: a systematic review of maternal pharmacokinetics and transplacental transfer. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016 May;12(5):523–31.Google Scholar
Calsteren, KV, Verbesselt, R, Devlieger, R, et al. Transplacental transfer of paclitaxel, docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab in a baboon model. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Dec;20(9):1456–64.Google Scholar
van Hasselt, JG, van Calsteren, K, Heyns, L, et al. Optimizing anticancer drug treatment in pregnant cancer patients: pharmacokinetic analysis of gestation-induced changes for doxorubicin, epirubicin, docetaxel and paclitaxel. Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):2059–65.Google Scholar
Amant, F, von Minckwitz, G, Han, SN, et al. Prognosis of women with primary breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: results from an international collaborative study. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2532–9.Google Scholar
Zagouri, F, Sergentanis, TN, Chrysikos, D, Filipits, M, Bartsch, R. Taxanes for ovarian cancer during pregnancy: a systematic review. Oncology. 2012;83(4):234–8.Google Scholar
Zagouri, F, Sergentanis, TN, Chrysikos, D, Bartsch, R. Platinum derivatives during pregnancy in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):337–43.Google Scholar
Geijteman, EC, Wensveen, CW, Duvekot, JJ, van Zuylen, L. A child with severe hearing loss associated with maternal cisplatin treatment during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;124(2Pt 2 Suppl 1):454–6.Google Scholar
Amant, F, Van Calsteren, K, Halaska, MJ, et al. Long-term cognitive and cardiac outcomes after prenatal exposure to chemotherapy in children aged 18 months or older: an observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):256–64.Google Scholar
Amant, F, Vandenbroucke, T, Verheecke, M, et al. Pediatric outcome after maternal cancer diagnosed during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1824–34.Google Scholar
Pentheroudakis, G, Pavlidis, N. Cancer and pregnancy: poena magna, not anymore. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jan;42(2):126–40.Google Scholar
Morice, P, Uzan, C, Gouy, S, Verschraegen, C, Haie-Meder, C. Gynaecological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet. 2012 Feb 11;379(9815):558–69.Google Scholar
Zanotti-Fregonara, P, Chastan, M, Edet-Sanson, A, et al. New fetal dose estimates from 18F-FDG administered during pregnancy: standardization of dose calculations and estimations with voxel-based anthropomorphic phantoms. J Nucl Med. 2016 Nov;57(11):1760–3.Google Scholar
Stensheim, H, Moller, B, van Dijk, T, Fossa, SD. Cause-specific survival for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy or lactation: a registry-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):4551.Google Scholar
Halaska, MJ, Uzan, C, Han, SN, et al. Characteristics of patients with cervical cancer during pregnancy: a multicenter matched cohort study. An initiative from the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Mar 20;ijgc-2018-000103.Google Scholar
Xia, T, Gao, Y, Wu, B, Yang, Y. Clinical analysis of twenty cases of cervical cancer associated with pregnancy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;141(9):1633–7.Google Scholar
Fruscio, R, de Haan, J, Van Calsteren, K, et al. Ovarian cancer in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 May;41:108–17.Google Scholar
Gui, T, Cao, D, Shen, K, et al. Management and outcome of ovarian malignancy complicating pregnancy: an analysis of 41 cases and review of the literature. Clin Transl Oncol. 2013 Jul;15(7):548–54.Google Scholar
Nazer, A, Czuzoj-Shulman, N, Oddy, L, Abenhaim, HA. Incidence of maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by ovarian masses. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Nov;292(5):1069–74.Google Scholar
Cardonick, E, Usmani, A, Ghaffar, S. Perinatal outcomes of a pregnancy complicated by cancer, including neonatal follow-up after in utero exposure to chemotherapy: results of an international registry. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;33(3):221–8.Google Scholar
Peccatori, FA, Azim, HA Jr, Orecchia, R, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(Suppl 6):vi160–70.Google Scholar
Blake, EA, Kodama, M, Yunokawa, M, et al. Feto-maternal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Mar;186:97105.Google Scholar
Hannuna, KY, Putignani, L, Silvestri, E, et al. Incidental endometrial adenocarcinoma in early pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Dec;19(9):1580–4.Google Scholar
Lee, YY, Roberts, CL, Dobbins, T, et al. Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated cancer in Australia, 1994–2008: a population-based linkage study. BJOG. 2012 Dec;119(13):1572–82.Google Scholar
Parazzini, F, Franchi, M, Tavani, A, Negri, E, Peccatori, FA. Frequency of pregnancy related cancer: a population based linkage study in Lombardy, Italy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Mar;27(3):613–19.Google Scholar
Matsuo, K, Whitman, SA, Blake, EA, et al. Feto-maternal outcome of pregnancy complicated by vulvar cancer: a systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:216–23.Google Scholar
Soo-Hoo, S, Luesley, D. Vulval and vaginal cancer in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 May;33:73–8.Google Scholar

References

Mitrou, S, Zarkavelis, G, Fotopoulos, G, Petrakis, D, Pavlidis, N. A mini review on pregnant mothers with cancer: a paradoxical coexistence. J Adv Res. 2016 Jul;7 (4):559–63.Google Scholar
Han, SN, Kesic, VI, Van Calsteren, K, Petkovic, S, Amant, F; ESGO ‘Cancer in Pregnancy’ Task Force. Cancer in pregnancy: a survey of current clinical practice.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Mar;167(1):1823.Google Scholar
Amant, F, Han, SN, Gziri, MM, et al. Management of cancer in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jul;29(5):741–53.Google Scholar
De Geus, KF, Maggen, C, de Haan, J, Amant, F. Implementation of cancer treatment during pregnancy in daily practice: the important role of perinatologists. Oncotarget. 2018 Aug 7;9(61):31795–6.Google Scholar
De Haan, J, Vandecaveye, V, Han, SN, Van de Vijver, KK, Amant, F. Difficulties with diagnosis of malignancies in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 May; 33:1932.Google Scholar
Van Calsteren, K, Amant, F. Cancer during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 May;93(5):443–6.Google Scholar
Ngu, SF, Ngan, HY. Chemotherapy in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 May;33:86101.Google Scholar
De Haan, J, Verheecke, M, Van Calsteren, K, et al.; International Network on Cancer and Infertility Pregnancy (INCIP). Oncological management and obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy: a 20-year international cohort study of 1170 patients. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):337–46.Google Scholar
Peccatori, FA, Fumagalli, M. Long and winding road of cancer and pregnancy: a need for action. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 10;35(14):14991500.Google Scholar
Verheecke, M, Cortès Calabuig, A, Finalet Ferreiro, J, et al. Genetic and microscopic assessment of the human chemotherapy-exposed placenta reveals possible pathways contributive to fetal growth restriction. Placenta. 2018 Apr;64:6170.Google Scholar
Boere, I, Lok, C, Vandenbroucke, T, Amant, F. Cancer in pregnancy: safety and efficacy of systemic therapies. Curr Opin Oncol. 2017 Sep;29(5):328–34.Google Scholar
Stensheim, H, Moller, B, Van Dijk, T, Fossa, SD. Cause specific survival for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy or lactation: a registry-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4551.Google Scholar
Lishner, M, Avivi, I, Apperley, JF, et al. Hematologic malignancies in pregnancy: management guidelines from an international consensus meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):501–8.Google Scholar
Moshe, Y, Bentur, OS, Lishner, M, Avivi, I. The management of Hodgkin lymphomas in pregnancies. Eur J Haematol. 2017 Nov;99(5):385–91.Google Scholar
Zagouri, F, Dimitrakakis, C, Marinopoulos, S, Tsigginou, A, Dimopoulos, MA. Cancer in pregnancy: disentangling treatment modalities. ESMO Open. 2016 May 4;1(3):e000016.Google Scholar
Paydas, S. Management of hemopoietic neoplasias during pregnancy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Aug;104:5264.Google Scholar
Pereg, D, Koren, G, Lishner, M. The treatment of Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in pregnancy. Hematologica. 2007;92:1230–7.Google Scholar
Berman, E. Pregnancy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 May;16(5S):660–2.Google Scholar
Ali, S, Jones, GL, Culligan, DJ, et al. British Committee for Standards in Haematology Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukaemia in pregnancy. Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170(4):487–95.Google Scholar
Verma, V, Giri, S, Manandhar, S, Pathak, R, Bhatt, VR. Acute promyelocytic leukemia during pregnancy: a systematic analysis of outcome. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57(3):616–22.Google Scholar
Vlijm-Kievit, A, Jorna, NGE, Moll, E, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia during the third trimester of pregnancy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 May;59(5):1274–6.Google Scholar
De Haan, J, Lok, CA, de Groot, CJ, et al.; International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP). Melanoma during pregnancy: a report of 60 pregnancies complicated by melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2017 Jun;27(3):218–23.Google Scholar
De Haan, J, van Thienen, JV, Casaer, M, et al. Severe adverse reaction to vemurafenib in a pregnant woman with metastatic melanoma. Case Rep Oncol. 2018 Feb 15;11(1):119–24.Google Scholar
Yu, SS, Bischoff, LA. Thyroid cancer in pregnancy. Semin Reprod Med. 2016 Nov;34(6):351–5.Google Scholar
Boucek, J, de Haan, J, Halaska, MJ, et al.; International Network on Cancer, Infertility, and Pregnancy. Maternal and obstetrical outcome in 35 cases of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma during pregnancy. Laryngoscope. 2018 Jun;128(6):14931500.Google Scholar
Modesti, C, Aceto, P, Masini, L, et al. Approach to thyroid carcinoma in pregnancy. Updates Surg. 2017 Jun;69(2):261–5.Google Scholar
Khaled, H, Al Lahloubi, N, Rashad, N. A review on thyroid cancer during pregnancy: Multitasking is required. J Adv Res. 2016 Jul; 7(4):565–70.Google Scholar
Kocián, P, De Haan, J, Cardonick, EH, et al.; Writing Committee of the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP). Management and outcome of colorectal cancer during pregnancy: report of 41 cases. Acta Chir Belg. 2018 Jul;16:110.Google Scholar
Rogers, JE, Dasari, A, Eng, C. The treatment of colorectal cancer during pregnancy: cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy challenges. Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):563–70.Google Scholar
Verheecke, M, Halaska, MJ, Lok, CA, et al.; ESGO Task Force ‘Cancer in Pregnancy’. Primary brain tumours, meningiomas and brain metastases in pregnancy: report on 27 cases and review of literature. Eur J Cancer. 2014 May;50(8):1462–71.Google Scholar

References

Knight, M, Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, et al. eds. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Future Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–2012. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2014.Google Scholar
Cantwell, R, Clutton-Brock, T, Cooper, G, et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011;118(Suppl 1):1203.Google Scholar
Draper, ES, Kurinczuk, JJ, Kenyon, S. eds. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Term, Singleton, Intrapartum Stillbirth and Intrapartum-Related Neonatal Death. Leicester: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester; 2017.Google Scholar
Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy: 4th Annual Report, 1 January–31 December 1995. London: Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium; 1997.Google Scholar
European Training Requirements in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UEMS Section Obstetrics and Gynaecology / European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Standing Committee on Training and Assessment, Version 2018.Google Scholar
Craig, C, Posner, GD. Developing a Canadian curriculum for simulation-based education in obstetrics and gynaecology: a Delphi study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(9):757–63.Google Scholar
Monod, C, Voekt, CA, Gisin, M, Gisin, S, Hoesli, IM. Optimization of competency in obstetrical emergencies: a role for simulation training. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(4):733–8.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A, Ayres-de-Campos, D, Lobo, M. Self-perceived impact of simulation-based training on the management of real-life obstetrical emergencies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(1):72–6.Google Scholar
Crofts, JF, Ellis, D, Draycott, TJ, et al. Change in knowledge of midwives and obstetricians following obstetric emergency training: a randomised controlled trial of local hospital, simulation centre and teamwork training. BJOG. 2007;114(12):1534–41.Google Scholar
Crofts, JF, Bartlett, C, Ellis, D, et al. Management of shoulder dystocia: skill retention 6 and 12 months after training. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1069–74.Google Scholar
Crofts, JF, Bartlett, C, Ellis, D, et al. Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1477–85.Google Scholar
Ellis, D, Crofts, JF, Hunt, LP, et al. Hospital, simulation center, and teamwork training for eclampsia management: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):723–31.Google Scholar
Crofts, JF, Bartlett, C, Ellis, D, et al. Patient-actor perception of care: a comparison of obstetric emergency training using manikins and patient-actors. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(1):20.Google Scholar
Draycott, T, Sibanda, T, Owen, L, et al. Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? BJOG. 2006;113(2):177–82.Google Scholar
PROMPT: PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training. www.promptmaternity.org/Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Collins, L, Bentley, S, Dong, Y, Satterwhite, CL. Multi-professional training for obstetric emergencies in a U.S. hospital over a 7-year interval: an observational study. J Perinatol. 2016;36(1):1924.Google Scholar
Shoushtarian, M, Barnett, M, McMahon, F, Ferris, J. Impact of introducing practical obstetric multi-professional training (PROMPT) into maternity units in Victoria, Australia. BJOG. 2014;121(13):1710–18.Google Scholar
Crofts, JF, Mukuli, T, Murove, BT, et al. Onsite training of doctors, midwives and nurses in obstetric emergencies, Zimbabwe. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(5):347–51.Google Scholar
Millde Luthander, C, Källen, K, Nyström, ME, et al. Results from the National Perinatal Patient Safety Program in Sweden: the challenge of evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(5):596603.Google Scholar
Fransen, AF, van de Ven, J, Schuit, E, et al. Simulation-based team training for multi-professional obstetric care teams to improve patient outcome: a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017;124(4):641–50.Google Scholar
Draycott, TJ, Crofts, JF, Ash, JP, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):1420.Google Scholar
Crofts, JF, Lenguerrand, E, Bentham, GL, et al. Prevention of brachial plexus injury-12 years of shoulder dystocia training: an interrupted time-series study. BJOG. 2016;123(1):111–18.Google Scholar
Walsh, JM, Kandamany, N, Ni Shuibhne, N, et al. Neonatal brachial plexus injury: comparison of incidence and antecedents between 2 decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):324.e1–.e6.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, IZ, Shah, M, Lean, K, et al. Management of shoulder dystocia: trends in incidence and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1059–68.Google Scholar
Siassakos, D, Hasafa, Z, Sibanda, T, et al. Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. BJOG. 2009;116(8):1089–96.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, L, Pedersen, TH, Atke, A, Møller, AM, Østergaard, D. Multidisciplinary team training reduces the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(10):1287–95.Google Scholar
Draycott, T, Sagar, R, Hogg, S. The role of insurers in maternity safety. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(8):1126–31.Google Scholar
Draycott, TJ, Collins, KJ, Crofts, JF, et al. Myths and realities of training in obstetric emergencies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(8):1067–76.Google Scholar
Yau, CWH, Pizzo, E, Morris, S, et al. The cost of local, multi-professional obstetric emergencies training. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(10):1111–19.Google Scholar
van de Ven, J, van Baaren, GJ, Fransen, AF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies (TOSTI study). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:130–7.Google Scholar
Siassakos, D, Fox, R, Bristowe, K, et al. What makes maternity teams effective and safe? Lessons from a series of research on teamwork, leadership and team training. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(11):1239–43.Google Scholar
Nielsen, PE, Goldman, MB, Mann, S, et al. Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(1):4855.Google Scholar
Siassakos, D, Fox, R, Crofts, JF, et al. The management of a simulated emergency: better teamwork, better performance. Resuscitation. 2011;82(2):203–6.Google Scholar
Siassakos, D, Bristowe, K, Draycott, TJ, et al. Clinical efficiency in a simulated emergency and relationship to team behaviours: a multisite cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2011;118(5):596607.Google Scholar
Hunziker, S, Bühlmann, C, Tschan, F, et al. Brief leadership instructions improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a high-fidelity simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(4):1086–91.Google Scholar
Bergh, A-M, Baloyi, S, Pattinson, RC. What is the impact of multi-professional emergency obstetric and neonatal care training? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(8):1028–43.Google Scholar
Draycott, T. Not all training for obstetric emergencies is equal, or effective. BJOG. 2017;124(4):651.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. Visible Learning. Abingdon and New York: Routledge; 2009.Google Scholar