Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-22T14:06:27.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Ludo Verhoeven
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Charles Perfetti
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth Pugh
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berent, I., Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Balaban, E., & Galaburda, A. M. (2012). Dyslexia impairs speech recognition but can spare phonological competence. PLoS One, 7, e44875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berlin, R. (1887). Eine Besondere Art der Wortblindheit (Dyslexie). Wiesbaden: J. F. Bergmann.Google Scholar
Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J. et al. (2008). Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 49(4), 422432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419421.Google Scholar
Brady, S., & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.) (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 121137.Google Scholar
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2016). Is Reading Recovery an effective intervention for students with reading difficulties? A critique of the i3 scale-up study. Reading Psychology, 37(7), 10251042.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151216). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1987). Varieties of developmental dyslexia: A comment on Bryant and Impey. Cognition, 27, 97101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589608.Google Scholar
Critchley, M. (1970). The dyslexic child. London: Heinemann Medical Books.Google Scholar
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, A. M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 571599.Google Scholar
Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnnie can’t read: And what you can do about it. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. M. (2009). Dyslexia: The evolution of a scientific concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 501508.Google Scholar
Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 3154.Google Scholar
Geudens, A., & Sandra, D. (2003). Beyond implicit phonological knowledge: No support for an onset-rime structure in children’s explicit phonological awareness. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 157182.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2011). A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gombert, J., & de Barrera, F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representation and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 1952.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Huss, M., Mead, N., Fosker, T., & Verney, J. P. (2012). Perception of patterns of musical beat distribution in phonological developmental dyslexia: Significant longitudinal relations with word reading and reading comprehension. Cortex, 49(5), 13631376.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(3), 273292.Google Scholar
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106(3), 491528.Google Scholar
Hay, J., & Bauer, L. (2007). Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language, 83, 388400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinshelwood, J. (1917). Congenital word blindness. London: H K. Lewis & Co.Google Scholar
Johnston, R., & Watson, J. (2007). Teaching synthetic phonics. Exeter, UK: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 6784). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, B. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24, 267289.Google Scholar
Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 295311.Google Scholar
Kussmaul, A. (1877). Diseases of the nervous system and disturbances of speech. In von Ziemssen, H. (Ed.), Cylopedia of the practice of medicine (pp. 770778). New York: William Wood.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18(2) 201212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., & Galaburda, A. M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88(18), 79437947.Google Scholar
Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 334358.Google Scholar
Lyon, G. R., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 578588.Google Scholar
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Petersen, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58(2), 157195.Google Scholar
May, H., Sirinides, P. M., Gray, A., & Goldsworthy, H. (2016). Reading Recovery: An Evaluation of the Four-Year i3 Scale-Up. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/81Google Scholar
Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M. et al. (2010). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 99127.Google Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. NIH Publication No. 004754. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf.Google Scholar
Nation’s Report Card (2015). National achievement level results. Online source. Nation’s Report Card. www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/.Google Scholar
Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2011). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427452.Google Scholar
Orton, S. (1925). Word blindness in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, S. T. (1929). The three levels of cortical elaboration to certain psychiatric symptoms. American Journal of Psychiatry, 8, 647659.Google Scholar
Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 785797.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. E., & Marcel, A. J. (1977). Aphasia, dyslexia and the phonological coding of written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(2), 307318.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. (2017). Learning to read English. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347370). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pringle Morgan, W. (1896). A case of congenital word blindness. British Medical Journal, 2, 1378.Google Scholar
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus., F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212218.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Rosen, S, Dakin, S. C. et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults, Brain, 126(1), 841865.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 129141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnick, D., & Resnick, L. (1977). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 370385.Google Scholar
Rezaie, R., Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M. et al. (2011). Temporo-parietal brain activity as a longitudinal predictor of response to educational interventions among middle school struggling readers. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 875885.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Caspi, A., Fergusson, D. et al. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability: New findings from 4 epidemiological studies. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 20072012.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115136.Google Scholar
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265282.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523568.Google Scholar
Serniclaes, W., Van Heghe, S., Mousty, P., Carré, R., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Allophonic mode of speech perception in dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 336361.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143174.Google Scholar
Shallice, T., Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 35(1), 111138.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and the practice: The perils of overreliance on an ‘outlier’ orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584615.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachman, B. A. et al. (2004). Development of left occipito-temporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55(9), 926933.Google Scholar
Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M. Sarkari, S. et al. (2007). Altering the brain circuits for reading through intervention: A magnetic source imaging study. Neuropsychology, 21(4), 485496.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J. (2015). The dyslexia debate. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20, 127128.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., Stackhouse, J., & Rack, J. P. (1986). Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: A developmental analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 309339.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(10), 590604.Google Scholar
Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neuroscience, 20(4), 147152.Google Scholar
Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407440.Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 721728.Google Scholar
Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A. et al. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5), 28602865.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. (2005). Remedial interventions for students with dyslexia: National goals and current accomplishments. In Richardson, S. O. & Gilger, J. (Eds.), Research-based education and intervention: What we need to know. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 161195.Google Scholar
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 767773.Google Scholar
Vaughan, S., Denton, C. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5), 432444.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R. (1981). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123141.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 124.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 375386.Google Scholar
Yoon, H-K., Bolger, D. J., Kwon, O-S., & Perfetti, C. A. (2002). Subsyllabic units in reading: A difference between Korean and English. In Verhoeven., L., Elbro, C., & Reitsma, P. (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 139163). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

References

Altarelli, I., Leroy, F., & Monzalvo, K. et al. (2014). Planum temporale asymmetry in developmental dyslexia: Revisiting an old question. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 57175735.Google Scholar
Altarelli, I., Monzalvo, K., Iannuzzi, S., Fluss, J., Billard, C., Ramus, F., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2013). A functionally guided approach to the morphometry of occipitotemporal regions in developmental dyslexia: Evidence for differential effects in boys and girls. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 1129611301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, D., Fluss, J., Billard, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2010). Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité: Comparaison de différents tests de lecture. L’Année Psychologique, 110, 299320.Google Scholar
Bogliotti, C., Serniclaes, W., Messaoud-Galusi, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2008). Discrimination of speech sounds by dyslexic children: Comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 137175.Google Scholar
Bosse, M. L., Tainturier, M. J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104, 198230.Google Scholar
Bryant, P., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 124137.Google Scholar
Casalis, S. (2003). The delay-type in developmental dyslexia: Reading processes. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, & Cognition, 10(1). http://journals.openedition.org/cpl/95Google Scholar
Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114138.Google Scholar
Casalis, S., Leuwers, C., & Hilton, H. (2013). Syntactic comprehension in reading and listening: A study in French dyslexic children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 201219.Google Scholar
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149180.Google Scholar
Catach, N. (2001). Histoire de l’orthographe française. Paris, France: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Chang, E. F., Rieger, J. W., Johnson, K., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 14281432.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204256.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Desrochers, A., & Levesque, K. (2017). Learning to read French. In Perfetti, C. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243269). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2014). Reading in the brain revised and extended: Response to comments. Mind & Language, 29, 320335.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Gentaz, E., Huron, C., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2011). Apprendre à lire: Des sciences cognitives à la salle de classe. Paris, France: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., & Braga, L. W. et al. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330, 13591364.Google Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Jobert, A., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. NeuroImage, 24, 2133.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1965). Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish. Heidelberg, Germany: Jumius Gross Verlag.Google Scholar
Doignon-Camus, N., Seigneuric, A., Perrier, E., Sisti, A., & Zagar, D. (2012). Evidence for a preserved sensitivity to orthographic redundancy and an impaired access to phonological syllables in French developmental dyslexic. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 117132.Google Scholar
Dufor, O., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Démonet, J. F. (2007). Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: A PET study. Neuroimage, 34, 16921707.Google Scholar
Dufor, O., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Démonet, J. F. (2009). Left pre-motor cortex and allophonic speech perception in dyslexia: A PET study. Neuroimage, 46, 241248.Google Scholar
Ecalle, J., Magnan, A., Bouchafa, H., & Gombert, J. E. (2009). Computer-based training with ortho-phonological units in dyslexic children: New investigations. Dyslexia, 15, 218238.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub‐Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250283.Google Scholar
Expertise collective INSERM. (2007). Dyslexie, dysorthographie, dyscalculie: Bilan des données scientifiques. Paris, France: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM).Google Scholar
Fayol, M., Thenevin, M. G., Jarousse, J. P., & Totereau, C. (1999). From learning to teaching to learn French written morphology. In Nunes, T. (Ed.), Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice (pp. 4364). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Génard, N., Mousty, P., Alegria, J., Leybaert, J., & Morais, J. (1998). Methods to establish subtypes of developmental dyslexia. In Reitsma, P. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Problems and interventions in literacy development (pp. 163176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Theurel, A. (2015). Differences in the predictors of reading comprehension in first graders from low socio-economic status families with either good or poor decoding skills. PLos One, 10(3), e0119581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Theurel, A., & Colé, P. (2013). Reading comprehension in a large cohort of French first graders from low socio-economic status families: A 7-month longitudinal study. PLos One, 8(11), e78608.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2015). Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: Three challenges for research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 4354.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 1952.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2003). Word superiority pseudoword superiority and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87, 432440.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054.Google Scholar
Habib, M., Rey, V., Daffaure, V., Camps, R., Espesser, R., Joly-Pottuz, B., & Démonet, J. F. (2002). Phonological training in children with dyslexia using temporally modified speech: A three-step pilot investigation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 289308.Google Scholar
Lallier, M., Thierry, G., & Tainturier, M. J. (2013). On the importance of considering individual profiles when investigating the role of auditory sequential deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 126, 121127.Google Scholar
Lassus-Sangosse, D., N’guyen-Morel, M. A., & Valdois, S. (2008). Sequential or simultaneous visual processing deficit in developmental dyslexia. Vision Research, 48, 979988.Google Scholar
Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l’Alouette. Paris, France: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée (ECPA).Google Scholar
Lehongre, K., Morillon, B., Giraud, A. L., & Ramus, F. (2013). Impaired auditory sampling in dyslexia: Further evidence from combined fMRI and EEG. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 7, 454. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00454.Google Scholar
Lehongre, K., Ramus, F., Villiermet, N., Schwartz, D., & Giraud, A. L. (2011). Altered low-g sampling in auditory cortex accounts for the three main facets of dyslexia. Neuron, 72, 10801090.Google Scholar
Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156166.Google Scholar
Lobier, M., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Le Bas, J. F. & Valdois, S. (2014). Visual processing of multiple elements in the dyslexic brain: Evidence for a superior parietal dysfunction. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 8, 479. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00479.Google Scholar
Lobier, M., Zoubrinetzky, R., & Valdois, S. (2012). The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal. Cortex, 48, 768773.Google Scholar
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 114.Google Scholar
Magnan, A., Ecalle, J., Veuillet, E., & Collet, L. (2004). The effects of an audio-visual training program in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 10, 131140.Google Scholar
Mahé, G., Bonnefond, A., & Doignon-Camus, N. (2013). Is the impaired N170 print tuning specific to developmental dyslexia? A matched reading-level study with poor readers and dyslexics. Brain and Language, 127, 539544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahé, G., Bonnefond, A., Gavens, N., Dufour, A., & Doignon-Camus, N. (2012). Impaired visual expertise for print in french adults with dyslexia as shown by N170 tuning. Neuropsychologia, 50, 32003206.Google Scholar
Maïonchi-Pino, N., Taki, Y., & Yokoyama, S. et al. (2013). Is the phonological deficit in developmental dyslexia related to impaired phonological representations and to universal phonological grammar? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 5373.Google Scholar
Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Peterson, A. (1996). On the basis of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157195.Google Scholar
Martin, J., Colé, P., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., Zorman, M., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2010). Reading in French-speaking adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 238264.Google Scholar
Maurer, U., Blau, V. C., Yoncheva, Y. N., & McCandliss, B. (2010). Development of visual expertise for reading: Rapid emergence of visual familiarity for an artificial script. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 404422.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322352.Google Scholar
Messaoud-Galusi, S., Hazan, V., & Rosen, S. (2011). Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: Is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 16821701.Google Scholar
Metsala, J. L., Stanovich, K. E., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). Regularity effects and the phonological deficit model of reading disabilities: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 279293.Google Scholar
Mody, M. (2003). Rapid auditory processing deficits in dyslexia: A commentary on two differing views. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 529539.Google Scholar
Monzalvo, K., Fluss, J., Billard, C., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2012). Cortical networks for vision and language in dyslexic and normal children of variable socio-economic status. Neuroimage, 61, 258274.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Mitterer, H., Serniclaes, W., & Verhoeven, L. (2013a). Neural evidence of the 501 allophonic mode of speech perception in adults with dyslexia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124, 11511162.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Serniclaes, W., & Verhoeven, L. (2013b). Neural evidence of allophonic perception in children at risk for dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2010–2017.Google Scholar
Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324339.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Démonet, J. F., & Fazio, F. et al. (2001). Dyslexia, Cultural diversity and Biological unity. Science, 291, 21652167.Google Scholar
Peereman, R., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Messaoud-Galusi, S. (2013). The contribution of morphology to the consistency of spelling-to-sound relations: A quantitative analysis based on French elementary school readers. L’Année Psychologique, 213, 113133.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357383. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piquard-Kipffer, A., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2013). Early predictors of future reading skills: A follow-up of French-speaking children from the beginning of kindergarten to the end of the second grade (age 5 to 8). L’Année Psychologique, 113, 491521.Google Scholar
Quémart, P., & Casalis, S. (2015). Visual processing of derivational morphology in children with developmental dyslexia: Insights from masked priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 345376.Google Scholar
Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212218.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 129141.Google Scholar
Reilhac, C., Jucla, M., Iannuzzi, S., Valdois, S., & Démonet, J. F. (2012). Effect of orthographic processes on letter identity and letter-position encoding in dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00154.Google Scholar
Ruff, S., Cardebat, D., Marie, N., & Démonet, J. F. (2002). Enhanced response of the left frontal cortex to slowed down speech in dyslexia: An fRMI study. Neuroreport, 13, 12851289.Google Scholar
Serniclaes, W., Collet, G., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2015). Review of neural rehabilitation programs for dyslexia: How can an allophonic system be changed into a phonemic one? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serniclaes, W., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2015). Reading impairment: From behavior to brain. In Bahr, R. & Silliman, E. (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders (pp. 3445). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carré, R., & Demonet, J. F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 384399.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, S. A., Gruen, J., Mody, M., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2009). Dyslexia. In Schwartz, R. G. (Ed.), The handbook of child language disorders (pp. 115139). Boca Raton, FL: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2003). Reading acquisition: Cross linguistic data. In Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 4366). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Kipffer-Piquard, A., Pinton, F., & Billard, C. (2009). Reliability and prevalence of an atypical development of phonological skills in French-speaking dyslexics. Reading and Writing, 22, 811842.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Lacert, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2000). On subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from processing time and accuracy scores. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 88104.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2006). Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia (Essays in developmental psychology). New-York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194217.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Jiménez, J. E., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). Prevalence and reliability of phonological, surface, and mixed profiles in dyslexia: A review of studies conducted in languages varying in orthographic depth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 498501.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114127.Google Scholar
Strong, G. K., Torgerson, C. J., Torgerson, D., & Hulme, C. (2011). A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the “Fast ForWord” language intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 224235.Google Scholar
Szenkovits, G., & Ramus, F. (2005). Exploring dyslexics’ phonological deficit I: Lexical versus sub-lexical and input versus output processes. Dyslexia, 11, 253268.Google Scholar
Valdois, S., Bosse, M. L., & Tainturier, M. J. (2004). Cognitive correlates of developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional deficit. Dyslexia, 10, 125.Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182198.Google Scholar
Talli, I., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Stavrakaki, S. (2015). Is there an overlap between specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia? New insights from French. In Stavrakaki, S. (Ed.), Language acquisition and language disorders (pp. 5788). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bus, A. G. (1994). Meta-analytic confirmation of the nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 266275.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151178.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., Dufau, S., & Grainger, J. (2010). Rapid processing of letters, digits, and symbols: What purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Developmental Science, 13, F8F14.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2009). Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia. Developmental Science, 12, 732745.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 947953.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120397.Google Scholar
Zoubrinetzky, R., Bielle, F., & Valdois, S. (2014). New insights on developmental dyslexia subtypes: Heterogeneity of mixed reading profiles. PLoS One, 9(6), e99337.Google Scholar

References

Bekebrede, J., van der Leij, A., Plakas, A., Share, D., & Morfidi, E. (2010). Dutch dyslexia in adulthood: Core features and variety. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 183210.Google Scholar
Blomert, L. (2005). Dyslexie in Nederland: Theorie, praktijk en beleid [Dyslexia in The Netherlands: theory, practice and policy]. Amsterdam: Nieuwezijds Publishers.Google Scholar
Blomert, L. (2006). Protocol dyslexie diagnostiek en behandeling [Protocol dyslexia diagnosis and treatment]. Amsterdam: CVZ.Google Scholar
Blomert, L. (2011). The neural signature of orthographic-phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. Neuroimage, 57, 695703.Google Scholar
Blomert, L., & Froyen, D. (2010). Multi-sensory learning and learning to read. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77, 195204.Google Scholar
Blomert, L., & Willems, G. (2010). Is there a causal link from a phonological awareness deficit to reading failure in children at familial risk for dyslexia? Dyslexia, 16, 300317.Google Scholar
Boets, B., Ghesquière, P., van Wieringen, A., & Wouters, J. (2007). Speech perception in preschoolers at family risk for dyslexia: Relations with low-level auditory processing and phonological ability. Brain and Language, 101, 1930.Google Scholar
Boets, B., Op de Beeck, H. P., & Vandermosten, M. et al. (2013). Intact but less accessible phonetic representations in adults with dyslexia. Science, 342, 12511254.Google Scholar
Boets, N., De Smedt, B., & Cleuren, L. et al. (2010). Towards a further characterization of phonological and literacy problems in children with dyslexia. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 531.Google Scholar
Booij, G. (1977). Dutch morphology: A study of word formation in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L., & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 173194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cordewener, K. A. H., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction: The case of spelling acquisition. Written Language & Literacy, 18, 121152.Google Scholar
de Bree, E. H., Wijnen, F. N. K., & Gerrits, P. A. M. (2010). Non-word repetition and literacy in Dutch children at-risk of dyslexia and children with SLI: Results of the follow-up study. Dyslexia, 16, 3644.Google Scholar
de Graaff, S., Bosman, A. M. T., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318333.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & Messbauer, V. C. S. (2011). Orthographic context and the acquisition of orthographic knowledge in normal and dyslexic readers. Dyslexia, 17, 107122.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450476.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 2240.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. J. (1971). Leerstoornissen [Learning disabilities]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. J. (1984). Lees- en spellingproblemen [Reading and spelling difficulties]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. J. (1991). Dyslexie: Theorie, diagnostiek en behandeling [Dyslexia: Theory, diagnostics and treatment]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
Eleveld, M. (2005). At risk for dyslexia: The role of phonological abilities, letter knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Gijsel, M. A. R., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2006). Kindergarten risk factors, cognitive factors, and teacher judgments as predictors of early reading in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 558571.Google Scholar
Health Council of the Netherlands. (1995). Dyslexia: Definition and treatment (publication no. 1995/15). The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening for word reading and spelling problems in elementary school: An item response theory approach. Education & Child Psychology, 24, 4256.Google Scholar
Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 459470.Google Scholar
Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2008). The use of sublexical clusters in normal reading and dyslexic readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 253280.Google Scholar
Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2011). Dyslexic and typical-reading children use vowel digraphs as perceptual units in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 504516.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H. A., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012a). Allophonic mode of speech perception in Dutch children at risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 14691483.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W. Segers, P. C. J., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H. A., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2012b). Neural evidence of allophonic perception in children at risk for dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 20102017.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, P. C. J., Wagensveld, B., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2013). Aberrant N400 responses to phonological overlap during rhyme judgements in children at risk for dyslexia. Brain Research, 1537, 233243.Google Scholar
Nunn, A. (1998). Dutch orthography. Utrecht: Center for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 785797.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L. & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 2138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pugh, K. R., Landi, N., & Preston, J. L. et al. (2013). The relationship between phonological and auditory processing and brain organization in beginning readers. Brain and Language, 125, 173183.Google Scholar
Ramus, F. (2004). Neurobiology of dyslexia: A reinterpretation of the data. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 720726.Google Scholar
Ramus, F. (2014). Neuroimaging sheds new light on the phonological deficit in dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 274275.Google Scholar
Regtvoort, A. G. F. M., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Early intervention with children of dyslexic parents: Effects of computer-based reading instruction at home on literacy acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 3553.Google Scholar
Rispens, J. E., McBride-Chang, C., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch: A cross-sectional study. Reading and Writing, 21, 587607.Google Scholar
Schaars, M. M. H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Word decoding development during phonics instruction in children at risk for dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23, 141160.Google Scholar
Serniclaes, W. (2011). Allophonic perception in dyslexia: An overview. Escritos de Psicología, 4, 2534.Google Scholar
Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., van Bon, W. H., & Schreuder, R. (2013). Instability of children’s reading errors in bisyllabic words: The role of context-sensitive spelling rules. Learning and Instruction, 26, 5970.Google Scholar
Stichting Dyslexie Nederland. (2008). Diagnose en behandeling van dyslexie (4th ed.) [Diagnosis and remediation of dyslexia]. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Stichting Dyslexie Nederland.Google Scholar
Stichting Dyslexie Nederland. (2016). Diagnose en behandeling van dyslexie (5th ed.) [Diagnosis and remediation of dyslexia]. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Stichting Dyslexie Nederland.Google Scholar
Tijms, J. (2011). Effectiveness of computer-based treatment for dyslexia in a clinical care setting: Outcomes and moderators. Educational Psychology, 31, 873896.Google Scholar
Tijms, J., Hoeks, J. J. W. M., Paulussen-Hoogeboom, M. C., & Smolenaars, A. J. (2003). Long-term effects of a psycholinguistic treatment for dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 121140.Google Scholar
Tilanus, E. A. T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Diagnostic profiles of children with developmental disabilities in a transparent orthography. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 41944202.Google Scholar
Tilanus, E. A. T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Responsiveness to intervention in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 22, 214–232.Google Scholar
van Bergen, E., de Jong, P. F., Plakas, A., Maassen, B., & van der Leij, A. (2012). Child and parental literacy levels within families with a history of dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 2836.Google Scholar
van Bergen, E., de Jong, P. F., Regtvoort, A. et al. (2011). Dutch children at family risk of dyslexia: Precursors, reading development, and parental effects. Dyslexia, 17, 218.Google Scholar
van den Boer, M., van Bergen, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The specific relation of visual attention span with reading and spelling in Dutch. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 141149.Google Scholar
van den Bos, K. P. (2008). Word-reading development, the double-deficit hypothesis, and the diagnosis of dyslexia. Educational and Child Psychology, 25, 5169.Google Scholar
van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & lutje Spelberg, H. C. (2002). Life-span data on continuous naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 2549.Google Scholar
van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & van den Broeck, W. (2003). Specific relations between alphanumeric-naming speed and reading speeds of monosyllabic and multisyllabic words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 407430.Google Scholar
van den Broeck, W., & Geudens, A. (2012). Old and new ways to study characteristics of reading disability: The case of the nonword-reading deficit. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 414456.Google Scholar
van den Broeck, W., Geudens, A., & van den Bos, K. P. (2010). The nonword-reading deficit of disabled readers: A developmental interpretation. Developmental Psychology, 46, 717734.Google Scholar
van den Bunt, M., Groen, M., Ito, T. et al. (2017). Increased response to altered auditory feedback in dyslexia: A weaker sensorimotor magnet implied in the phonological deficit. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 654667.Google Scholar
van der Kleij, S. W., Segers, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Response to intervention as a predictor of long-term reading outcomes in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23, 268282.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A. (1998). Leesproblemen en dyslexie [Reading problems and dyslexia]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A. (2013). Dyslexia and early intervention: What did we learn from the Dutch dyslexia programme? Dyslexia, 19, 241255.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A., & Morfidi, E. (2006). Core deficits and variable differences in Dutch poor readers learning English. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 7490.Google Scholar
van der Leij, A., van Bergen, E., van Zuijen, T. et al. (2013). Precursors of developmental dyslexia: An overview of the longitudinal Dutch dyslexia programme study. Dyslexia, 19, 191213Google Scholar
van Gorp, K., Segers, P. C. J. & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2017). Enhancing decoding efficiency in poor readers via a word identification game. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 105123.Google Scholar
van Otterloo, S. G., & van der Leij, A. (2009). Dutch home-based pre-reading intervention with children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 169195.Google Scholar
van Otterloo, S. G., van der Leij, A., & Henrichs, L. F. (2009). Early home-based intervention in the Netherlands for children at familial risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 15, 187217.Google Scholar
Vandermosten, M., Boets, B., & Luts, H. et al. (2011). Impairments in speech and nonspeech sound categorization in children with dyslexia are driven by temporal processing difficulties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 593603.Google Scholar
Vandermosten, M., Vanderauwera, J., & Theys, C. et al. (2015). A DTI tractography study in pre-readers at risk for dyslexia. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 815.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2017). Learning to read Dutch. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 323346). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Keuning, J. (2018). The nature of developmental dyslexia in a transparent orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 723.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2006). Learnability of graphotactic rules in visual word identification. Learning and Instruction, 16, 538548.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Haarman, V. (2006). Prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words. Reading and Writing, 19, 651668.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2009). Modeling the growth of word decoding skills: Evidence from Dutch. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 205223.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. & van Leeuwe, J. (2011). Role of gender and linguistic diversity in word decoding development. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 359367.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., Irausquin, R., & Segers, E. (2016). The unique role of lexical accessibility in predicting kindergarten emergent literacy. Reading and Writing, 29, 591608.Google Scholar
Vloedgraven, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: An IRT approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 3350.Google Scholar
Vloedgraven, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2009). The nature of phonological awareness throughout the elementary grades: An item response theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 161169.Google Scholar
Wentink, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2001). Protocol leesproblemen en dyslexie in de onderbouw [Protocol reading problems in the lower primary grades]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.Google Scholar
Wentink, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Protocol leesproblemen en dyslexie in de bovenbouw [Protocol reading problems in the upper primary grades]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151178.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20120397.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Borkowski, J., & Muthukrishna, N. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: “Working models” and effective strategy teaching. In Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Guthrie, J. T. (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 477501). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bosse, M.-L., Tainturier, M.-J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104, 198230.Google Scholar
Bruck, M., & Waters, G. (1988). An analysis of the spelling errors of children who differ in their reading and spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 7792.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. (2017). Learning to read Czech and Slovak. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 371392). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 13981407.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., & Mousikou, P. et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678686.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., & Mikulajová, M. (2008). Effects of letter-sound consistency, letter-form complexity, and frequency in learning canonical and contextually conditioned letter spellings in Slovak. Phonetica Pragensia, 11, 2130.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Mikulajová, M., & Vencelová, L. (2008a). Spelling of Slovak children with dyslexia. Paper presented at the International Conference of the British Dyslexia Association, Harrogate, UK.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Mikulajová, M., & Vencelová, L. (2008b). Súbor testov na hodnotenie pravopisných schopností pre škoslkú a klinickú prax [Battery of tests for the assessment of spelling skills for school and clinical practice]. Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovenská asociácia logopédov.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., & Samara, A., (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.013.21.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., & Volín, J. (2001). Phonological spelling errors among dyslexic children learning a transparent orthography: The case of Czech. Dyslexia, 7, 229245.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., & Volín, J. (2005). Baterie diagnostických testů gramotnostních dovedností pro žáky 2. až 5. ročníků ZŠ [Battery of diagnostic tests of literacy skills for pupils in 2nd to 5th grade]. Prague: IPPP ČR.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Volín, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cimlerová, P., Pokorná, D., & Chalupová, E. (2007). Diagnostika specifických poruch učení u adolescentů a dospělých osob [Diagnosis of specific reading disorders in adolescents and adults].Prague: IPPP ČR.Google Scholar
Edfeldt, W. A. (1968). Reverzní test [Reversals test]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frostig, M. (1972). Vývojový test zrakového vnímání [Developmental test of visual perception]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.Google Scholar
Froyen, D., Willems, G., & Blomert, L. (2010). Evidence for a specific cross-modal association deficit in dyslexia: An electrophysiological study of letter-speech sound processing. Developmental Science, 14, 635648.Google Scholar
Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 8595.Google Scholar
Gebhardtová, D. (1994). Výsledky výzkumu dětí se specifickými vývojovými poruchami v oblasti čtení a psaní [Results of research on children with specific developmental disorders in reading and spelling]. In Kucharská, A., Slavíková, I., & Lepová, R. (Eds.), Specifické poruchy učení a chování [Specific disorders of learning and behavior]. Prague: IPPP ČR.Google Scholar
Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Liao, C. H. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 21, 885903.Google Scholar
Goulandris, N. (2003). Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Caravolas, M., Málková, G., & Brigstocke, S. (2005). Phoneme isolation ability is not simply a consequence of letter-sound knowledge. Cognition, 97, B1B11.Google Scholar
International Dyslexia Association. (2002). Definition of dyslexia. http://eida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/.Google Scholar
Kessler, B., & Caravolas, M. (2011). Weslalex: West Slavic lexicon of child-directed printed words. http://spell.psychology.wustl.edu/weslalex.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341362.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453464.Google Scholar
Košč, L. (1987). Patopsychológia učenia a jej neuropsychologické základy [Pathology of learning and its neuropsychological foundations]. Bratislava: SPN.Google Scholar
Kučera, H., & Monroe, G. K. (1968). A comparative, quantitative phonology of Russian, Czech, and German. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kucharská, A. (2014). Rizika vzniku dyslexie [Risks of developing dyslexia]. Habilitační práce. Prague: PedF UK v Praze.Google Scholar
Kucharská, A., & Barešová, P. (2012). Vývojová dynamika čtení v analyticko-syntetické metodě čtení a metodě genetické v 1. a 2. třídě a její uplatnění v poradenské diagnostice [The dynamics of reading development in the analytic-synthetic versus the genetic methods in 1st and 2nd grade, and their validity for clinical diagnosis]. Pedagogika, 62(1–2), 6580.Google Scholar
Kucharská, A., Seidlová, M., Sotáková, H. et al. (2014). Porozumění čtenému I. Typický vývoj porozumění čtenému – východiska, témata, zdroje (kritická analýza) [Reading Comprehension I. Typical development of reading comprehension – perspectives, themes, tools (critical analysis)]. Prague, Czech Republic: Pedagogical Faculty – Charles University.Google Scholar
Landerl, K., Ramus, F., & Moll, K. et al. (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315334.Google Scholar
Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 10401048.Google Scholar
Matějček, Z. (1959). Klinický obraz dyslektického dieťaťa [Clinical profile of the dyslexic child]. Psychológia a patopsychológia dieťaťa, 1(2), 8386.Google Scholar
Matějček, Z. (1961). Školní selhání některých dětí normálního nadání [Scholastic failure of some children with normal abilities]. Československá pediatrie, 16(10), 877882.Google Scholar
Matějček, Z. (1978). Vývojové poruchy čtení [Developmental disorders of learning]. Prague: SPN.Google Scholar
Matějček, Z. (1995). Dyslexie: specifické poruchy čtení [Dyslexias: specific disorder of reading]. Jinočany, Czech Republic: H&H.Google Scholar
Mertin, V. (2008). Reakce na intervenci – nové kritérium při diagnostice specifických poruch učení [Response to intervention – New criteria in diagnosing specific disorders of learning]. Pražské sociálně vědní studie, Psychologická řada PSY-22. Prague: FSV UK a FF UK.Google Scholar
Míka, J. (1982). Orientační test dynamické praxe [Orientational test of dynamic practice]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.Google Scholar
Mikulajová, M. (2010). Metódy diagnostiky dyslexie [Methods of diagnosing dyslexia]. CD nosič. Bratislava: Mabag.Google Scholar
Mikulajová, M., Nováková Schöffelová, M., Tokárová, O., & Dostálová, A. (2016). Trénink jazykových schopností podle D. B. Elkonina [Training of language abilities according to D. B. Elkonin]. 2nd ed. Prague: Centrum Rozum, V.O.S.Google Scholar
Mikulajová, M., Tokárová, O., & Sümegiová, Z. (2014). Tréning fonematického uvedomovania podľa D. B. Eľkonina [Training of phoneme awareness according to D.B. Elkonin]. 2nd ed. Bratislava: Dialóg, spol. s r.o.Google Scholar
Mikulajová, M., Váryová, B., Vencelová, L., Caravolas, M., & Škrabáková, G. (2012). Čítanie, písanie a dyslexia (s testami a normami) [Reading, writing and dyslexia (with tests and norms]. Bratislava: Slovenská asociácia logopédov.Google Scholar
Mikulajová, M. & Velecká, A. (2012). Profil slovenských dětí s „dyslexií” z pohledu jejich čtenářských schopností. Pedagogika, 62(12), 137149.Google Scholar
Mladá, P. (1996). Zbývá jen málo – chtít pochopit, aneb dyslexie na 2. stupni ZŠ. [All that remains is to want to understand, or, dyslexia in the second grade of elementary school]. In Kucharská, A. (Ed.), Specifické poruchy učení a chování 1996 (pp. 6164.). Prague: Portál.Google Scholar
Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2009). Double dissociation between reading and spelling deficits. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 359382.Google Scholar
Moll, K., Loff, A., & Snowling, M. (2013). Cognitive endophenotypes of dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 385397. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.736439.Google Scholar
Moll, K., Ramus, F., & Bartling, et al. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 6577. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003.Google Scholar
Moll, K., Thompson, P. A., & Mikulajová, M. et al. (2016). Precursors of reading difficulties in Czech and Slovak children at-risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 22, 120136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1002/dys.1526.Google Scholar
Pardel, T. (1966). Písaná reč, jej vývin a poruchy u detí [Written language, its development and disorders]. Bratislava: SPN.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385413.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816833. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00317 .Google Scholar
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265282.Google Scholar
Schöffelová, M., & Mikulajová, M. (2012). Vývoj různých aspektů čtení ve slovenštině [The development of various aspects of reading in Slovak]. Pedagogika, 1–2, 111125.Google Scholar
Seidlová Málková, G., & Caravolas, M. (2013). Baterie testů fonologických schopností, BTFS [Battery of tests of phonological abilities]. Prague: Národní ústav pro vzdělávání.Google Scholar
Share, D. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584615.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Development, 74, 358373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402003.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). Annual research review: The nature and classification of reading disorders – A commentary on proposals for DSM-5. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 593607.Google Scholar
Sokolová, M., Musilová, K., & Slančová, D. (2005). Slovenčina a čeština (Synchrónne porovnanie s cvičeniami) [Slovak and Czech (Synchronic comparison with exercises)]. Bratislava: FF UK.Google Scholar
Švancarová, D., & Kucharská, A. (2001). Test rizika poruch čtení a psaní pro rané školáky [Test of risk of disorders in reading and writing for young school children].Prague: Scientia.Google Scholar
Tiefenbacherová, B. (2014). Možnosti stimulácie morfo-syntaktických schopností v predškolskom veku [Approaches to the stimulation of morphosyntactic abilities in the preschool years]. Master’s thesis. Bratislava: Pedagogical Faculty, Comenius University.Google Scholar
Torppa, M., Lyytinen, P., Erskine, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Language development, literacy skills, and predictive connections to reading in Finnish children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 308321. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219410369096.Google Scholar
Torppa, M., Poikkeus, A.-M., Laakso, M.-L., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2006). Predicting delayed letter knowledge development and its relation to grade 1 reading achievement among children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 42, 11281142.Google Scholar
Váryová, B. (2012). Skúšky čítania pre mladší školský vek [Tests of reading for the younger school years]. In Mikulajová, M., Váryová, B., Vencelová, L., Caravolas, M., & Škrabáková, G. (Eds.). Čítanie, písanie a dyslexia (s testami a normami) [Reading, writing and dyslexia (with tests and norms)] (pp. 126159). Bratislava: Slovenská asociácia logopédov.Google Scholar
Vencelová, L., & Kapalková, S. (2014). Východiská tvorby novej inovatívnej metodiky výučby slovenského jazyka v 1. ročníku základnej školy [The scope of the new innovative method in Slovak language arts curriculum for grade 1]. Logopaedica XVII, 105117.Google Scholar
Vencelová, L., & Mikulajová, M. (2010). Čítanie a pravopis po slovensky hovoriacich dyslektických detí – porovnávacia štúdia [Reading and spelling of Slovak-speaking children with dyslexia – Comparative study]. Psychológia a patopsychológia dieťaťa, 45 (3), 215228.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 133.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668680.Google Scholar

References

Aro, M. (2017). Learning to read Finnish. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 416436). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Brem, S., Bach, S., & Kucian, K. et al. (2010). Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter–speech sound correspondences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 79397944.Google Scholar
Guttorm, T., Leppänen, P., Hämäläinen, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Newborn event-related potentials predict poorer pre-reading skills in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 391401.Google Scholar
Heikkilä, R., Aro, M., Närhi, V., Westerholm, J., & Ahonen, T. (2013). Does training in syllable recognition improve reading speed? A computer-based trial with poor readers from second and third grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 398414.Google Scholar
Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 401413.Google Scholar
Huemer, S., Aro, M., Landerl, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Repeated reading of syllables among Finnish-speaking children with poor reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 317340.Google Scholar
Ketonen, R. (2010). Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 0075–4625, 404. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, T., Pulkkinen, J., & Jahnukainen, M. (2013). Erityisopetuksen muutostrendit perusopetuksessa 2000-luvulla [The trends of change in special education after year 2000]. Valtiontalouden tarkastusvirasto [National Audit Office of Finland]. https://docplayer.fi/10162284-Erityisopetuksen-muutostrendit-perusopetuksessa-2000-luvulla.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Kujala, T., Karma, K., & Ceponiene, R. et al. (2001). Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 1050910514.Google Scholar
Leppänen, P. H. T., Hämäläinen, J. A., & Salminen, H. et al. (2010). Brain event-related potentials reveal atypical processing of sound frequency and the subsequent association with later literacy skills in children with familial dyslexia. Cortex, 46, 13621376.Google Scholar
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia – Early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2, 330338.Google Scholar
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Kujala, J., Ojanen, E., & Richardson, U. (2009). In search of a science-based application: A learning tool for reading acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 668675.Google Scholar
Malin, A., Sulkunen, S., & Laine, K. (2013). PIAAC 2012. Kansainvälisen aikuistutkimuksen ensituloksia [PIAAC 2012. The survey of adult skills]. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja, 19.Google Scholar
Official Statistics of Finland. (2014). Special education. Share of students having received special support diminished [e-publication]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/erop/2013/erop_2013_2014–06-12_tie_001_en.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Oksanen, A.-M. (2012). Auditiivisen ja kielellisen harjoittelun vaikutus kolmannella luokalla olevien heikkojen lukijoiden lukutaitoon. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 443. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., & Vauras, M. (1999). Who benefits from training in linguistic awareness in the first grade, and what components show training effects? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 437446.Google Scholar
Richardson, U., Leppänen, P. H. T., Leiwo, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2003). Speech perception of infants with high familial risk for dyslexia differ at the age of 6 months. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 385397.Google Scholar
Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2014). The GraphoGame method: The theoretical and methodological background of the technology-enhanced learning environment for learning to read. Human Technology, 10, 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at-risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82, 10131028.Google Scholar

References

Akhutina, T. V. (2006). Nejropsihologicheskij podhod k izucheniyu trudnostej pis’ma i chteniya [Neuropsychological approach to analyzing reading and writing difficulties]. Paper presented at the conference “Rannyaya diagnostika, profilaktika i korrekciya narushenij pis’ma i chteniya: materialy II mezhdunarodnoj konferencii Rossijskoj associacii disleksii.”Google Scholar
Akhutina, T. V., & Pronina, E. A. (2015). Ocenka sostoyaniya regulyacii aktivacii u pervoklassnikov s pomoshch’yu metodiki RAN/RAS [Assessment of brain activation regulation in first-graders via RAN/RAS test]. Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal, 1, 6169.Google Scholar
Akhutina, T. V., & Pylaeva, N. M. (2008). Preodolenie trudnostej ucheniya: nejropsihologicheskij podhod [Overcoming learning disabilities: the neuropsychological approach]. St Petersburg: Piter.Google Scholar
Barabanova, S. YU. (2014). Psihologo-pedagogicheskie osnovy po okazaniyu pomoshchi detyam v formirovanii navyka beglogo chteniya [Psychological-pedagogical foundations of intervention for reading fluency in children]. Municipal’noe obrazovanie: innovacii i eksperiment, 3, 2427.Google Scholar
Bezrukikh, M. M., Adamovskaya, O. N., & Ivanov, V. V. (2017). Osobennosti zritel’nogo vospriyatiya i okulomotornoj aktivnosti u pervoklassnikov pri chtenii tekstov razlichnoj slozhnosti [Characteristics of visual perception and oculomotor activity in first-graders while reading texts of various difficulty]. Fiziologiya cheloveka, 43, 5665.Google Scholar
Beten’kova, N., Goreckij, V., & Fonin, D. (2004). Azbuka. Dlya pervogo klassa chetyrekhletnej nachal’noj shkoly [Alphabet. For the first grade of primary school] (3rd ed.). St Petersburg: SpecLit, Planeta znanij.Google Scholar
Bondarko, L. V. (1998). Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Phonetics of modern Russian language]. St Petersburg: St Petersburg State University.Google Scholar
Boulware‐Gooden, R., Joshi, R. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2015). The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography in English and Russian spelling. Dyslexia, 21, 142161.Google Scholar
Chirkina, G. V., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Tracking citations: A science detective story. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 366373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219412471995.Google Scholar
Chirkina, G. V., Rusetskaya, M. N., & Rossijskaya, E. N. (Eds.). (2011). Kognitivnoe i kommunikativnoe razvitie shkol’nikov s disleksiej: integral’nyj podhod [Development of cognition and communication in students with dyslexia: integration approach]. Moscow: Nacional’nyj knizhnyj centr.Google Scholar
Chirkina, G. V., Rusetskaya, M. N., & Rossijskaya, E. N. (Eds.). (2009). Variativnye strategii soprovozhdeniya uchashchihsya s narusheniyami pis’ma i chteniya [Various strategies of intervention for students with reading and writing disabilities]. Moscow: RDA, MGPU, URAO IKP.Google Scholar
CK VKP. (1936). Postanovlenie CK VKP(b) ot 04.07.1936 o pedologicheskih izvrashcheniyah v sisteme NARKOMPROSOV (Act on pedological perversions in the system of NARKOMPROS). Moscow. http://pravo.levonevsky.org/baza/soviet/sssr6510.htm.Google Scholar
Cubberley, P. (2002). Russian: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dmitrova, E. D., Dubrovinskaya, N. V., Lukashevich, I. P., Machinskaya, R. I., & Shklovskij, V. M. (2005). Osobennosti mozgovogo obespecheniya verbal’nyh processov u detej s trudnostyami pis’ma i chteniya [Features of cerebral support of verbal processes in children with dysgraphia and dyslexia]. Fiziologiya cheloveka, 31, 512.Google Scholar
Elkonin, D. B. (1988). How to teach children to read. Advances in Psychology, 49, 387426.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Russian “defectology”: Anticipating perestroika in the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 193207.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2003). Matryoshka, matryozhka, or motryoshka: The difficulty of mastering reading and spelling in Russian. In Goulandris, N. (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages: A cross-linguistic comparison (pp. 92111). London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2005). If John were Ivan: Would he fail in reading? In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 303320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Report on the Russian language for the World Dyslexia Forum. www.dyslexia-international.org/WDF/Files/WDF2010-Grigorenko-paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2011a). Gramotnost’ shkol’nika; eyo ocenka uchitelem, samim shkol’nikom i ob“ektivnymi testami [Literacy of students: its evaluation provided by a teacher, student and direct testing]. Mir Obrazovaniya, 3, 119125.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2011b). Universal’nye prediktory gramotnosti. Universal’ny li oni i dlya russkogo yazyka? [Universal predictors of literacy. Are they universal in the context of Russian language?] Novoe v Psihologo-pedagogicheskih Issledovaniyah, 4, 6368.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2011c). Etap «dochteniya», ego harakteristiki i ih rol’ v ovladenii chteniem [The stage of “pre-reading,” its characteristics and their role in mastering reading]. Voprosy psihologii, 6, 122130.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Ponimanie prochitannogo shkol’nikami i ego prediktory [Pupils’ reading comprehension its predictors]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 1, 6574.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., & Elliott, D. D. (2012). Chtenie o chtenii [Reading about reading]. Voronezh: Ayist.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Kornev, A. N., Rakhlin, N., & Krivulskaya, S. (2011). Reading-related skills, reading achievement, and inattention: A correlational study. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10, 140156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., & Kornilova, T. V. (1997). The resolution of the nature-nurture controversy by Russian psychology: Culturally biased or culturally specific? In, R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 393439). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karpova, N., Granik, G., & Kabardov, M. (Eds.). (2013). Issledovaniya chteniya i gramotnosti v Psihologicheskom institute za 100 let: Hrestomatiya [Studies of reading and literacy carried out at the Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education in a hundred years]. Moscow: Russkaya shkol’naya bibliotechnaya associaciya.Google Scholar
Kerek, E., & Niemi, P. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15, 80113. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker.Google Scholar
Kornev, A. N. (2003). Narusheniya chteniya i pis’ma u detej [Reading disabilities in children]. St Petersburg: Rech’.Google Scholar
Kornev, A. N. (2007). Uzlovye voprosy disleksii. Defektologiya [Main issues in Defectology], 1, 5966.Google Scholar
Kornev, A. N., & Ishimova, O. (2010). Metodika diagnostiki disleksii u detej [Method of diagnosing dyslexia]. St Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Politekhnicheskogo instituta.Google Scholar
Kornev, A. N., Rakhlin, N., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Dyslexia from a cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective: The case of Russian and Russia. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 8, 4169.Google Scholar
Kornilov, S. A., Landi, N., Rakhlin, N., Fang, S. Y., Grigorenko, E. L., & Magnuson, J. S. (2014). Attentional but not pre-attentive neural measures of auditory discrimination are atypical in children with developmental language disorder. Developmental Neuropsychology, 39, 543567.Google Scholar
Kornilov, S. A., Magnuson, J. S., Rakhlin, N., Landi, N., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2015). Lexical processing deficits in children with developmental language disorder: An event-related potentials study. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 459476.Google Scholar
Kovaleva, G. S., Koshelenko, N. G., Kuznetsova, M. I., Loginova, O. B., & Zukerman, G. A. (2013). Osnovnye rezul’taty mezhdunarodnogo issledovaniya chitatel’skoj gramotnosti PIRLS-2011: Analiticheskij otchet [Main results of international research on readers’ literacy PIRLS-2011: Analytical report]. Moscow: MAKS Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, O. A., & Khromov, L. N. (1983). Tekhnika bystrogo chteniya [Speed reading technique]. Moscow: Kniga.Google Scholar
Lalaeva, R. I. (1983). Narushenie processa ovladeniya chteniem u shkol’nikov [Reading disabilities in students]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1969). Vysshie korkovye funkcii cheloveka [Human higher order cortical functions]. Moscow.Google Scholar
Lyakso, E. E., & Frolova, O. V. (2013). Razvitie rechi i formirovanie navyka chteniya u detej: Longityudnoe issledovanie ot rozhdeniya do 7 let. [Speech development and reading skills formation in children: longitudinal study from birth to 7 years.] Psihologicheskij Zhurnal, 34(3), 2435.Google Scholar
Lyakso, E. E., Frolova, O. V., Smirnov, A. G. et al. (2012). Uroven’ rechevogo razvitiya detej na ehtape formirovaniya navyka chteniya [Level of language development of children at the stage of reading development]. Psihologicheskij Zhurnal, 33(1), 7387.Google Scholar
Ministerstvo Obrazovaniya i Nauki Rossijskoj Federacii. (2011). Federal’nye gosudarstvennye obrazovatel’nye standarty [Federal educational standards]. Moscow: Ministerstvo Obrazovaniya i Nauki Rossijskoj Federacii.Google Scholar
Ministerstvo Obrazovaniya i Nauki Rossijskoj Federacii. (2012). Ob obrazovanii v Rossijskoj Federacii. (Federal’nyj zakon ot 29.12.2012 N 273-FZ (red. ot 01.05.2017, s izm. ot 05.07.2017)) (Federal law N 273-FZ of 29/12/2012 on education). Moscow: Ministerstvo obrazovaniya i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii.Google Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Google Scholar
Naples, A. J., Chang, J. T., Katz, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Same or different? Insights into the etiology of phonological awareness and rapid naming. Biological Psychology, 80, 226239. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.002.Google Scholar
Naples, A. J., Katz, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Lexical decision as an endophenotype for reading comprehension: An exploration of an association. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 13451360.Google Scholar
OECD. (2016). Russian Federation. Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2016-76-en.Google Scholar
Paramonova, L. (2006). Disgrafiya: diagnostika, profilaktika, korrekciya [Dysgraphia: assessment, prevention, intervention]. St Petersburg: Detstvo-Press.Google Scholar
Rakhlin, N., Cardoso-Martins, C., Kornilov, S. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013a). Spelling well despite developmental language disorder: What makes it possible? Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 253273.Google Scholar
Rakhlin, N., Cardoso-Martins, C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Phonemic awareness is a more important predictor of orthographic processing than rapid serial naming: Evidence from Russian. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 395414.Google Scholar
Rakhlin, N., Kornilov, S. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2017). Reading acquisition in Russian. In Verhoeven, L. T. V. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 393415). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rakhlin, N., Kornilov, S. A., & Palejev, D. et al. (2013b). The language phenotype of a small geographically isolated Russian-speaking population: Implications for genetic and clinical studies of developmental language disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 9711003.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Marshall, C. R., Rosen, S., & van der Lely, H. K. (2013). Phonological deficits in specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia: towards a multidimensional model. Brain, 136, 630645.Google Scholar
Sokolova, L. V. (2005). Psihofiziologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya navyka chteniya: Diss. d-ra biologichekih nauk [Psychophysiological foundations of reading development: PhD dissertation] 03.00. 13, 19.00. 02/Sokolova Lyudmila Vladimirovna.-Arhangel’sk, 2005.-284 s. RGB OD, 71, 06-3.Google Scholar
Starzhinskaya, N. S. (1988). Formirovanie sinteticheskogo chteniya u detej 6 let [Development of synthetic reading skills in 6-year-old children]. Voprosy psihologii, 5, 5462.Google Scholar
Thompson, S., Provasnik, S., Kastberg, D., Ferraro, D., Lemanski, N., & Roey, S. (2012). Highlights from PIRLS 2011: Reading achievement of US fourth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: NCES. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013010rev.pdf.Google Scholar
Vasil’eva, N. N. (2011). Korrekciya trudnostej formirovaniya navyka chteniya u mladshih shkol’nikov v processe razvitiya binokulyarnyh zritel’nyh funkcij [Correction of reading difficulties in primary school students in the process of development of binocular vision functions]. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 19, 515.Google Scholar
Vasil’eva, N. N., & Rozhkova, G. I. (2011). Trenirovka binokulyarnyh zritel’nyh funkcij u mladshih shkol’nikov s trudnostyami v chtenii kak faktor korrekcionnoj raboty [Training of binocular vision functions intervention in primary school students with reading disabilities]. Novye issledovaniya, 1, 517.Google Scholar
Vizel, T. G. (2005). Osnovy nejropsihologii [Foundations of neuropsychology]. Moscow: Astrel.Google Scholar
Voice of America. (2010). Russkiye – samaya chitayushchaya natsiya v mire: mif ili real’nost’? [Russians – the most reading nation in the world: Myth or reality?] www.golos-ameriki.ru/a/russia-books-2010–08-18–101018824/187666.html.Google Scholar
Zabozlaeva, I. V., Suprun, S. A., & Lugovyh, N. A. (2010). Kliniko-patogeneticheskie osobennosti smeshannyh rasstrojstv razvitiya shkol’nyh navykov [Clinico-patogeneticals pecularities of the mixed school skills disorders]. Ural’skij medicinskij zhurnal, 9, 3538.Google Scholar
Zavadenko, N. N., & Roumyantseva, M. (2008). Disleksiya: mekhanizmy razvitiya i principy lecheniya [Dyslexia: underlying mechanisms and treatment principles]. Russkij zhurnal detskoj nevrologii, 3, 39.Google Scholar
Zukerman, G. A., Kovaleva, G. S., & Kuznetsova, M. I. (2007). Horosho li chitayut rossijskie shkol’niki? [Do Russian pupils read well?] Voprosy obrazovaniya, 4, 240267.Google Scholar
Zukerman, G. A., Kovaleva, G. S., & Kuznetsova, M. I. (2011). Pobeda v PIRLS i porazhenie v PISA: sud’ba chitatel’skoj gramotnosti 10–15-letnih shkol’nikov [Winning the PIRLS and losing PISA: Destiny of readers’ literacy in 10–15-year-old students]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2, 123150.Google Scholar
Zukerman, G. A., & Shkolyarenko, E. K. (1997). Kak Vinni-Puh i vse-vse-vse nauchilis’ chitat’ [How Winnie the Pooh and friends learned how to read]. Moscow: INTOR.Google Scholar

References

Ahissar, M. (2007). Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 458465.Google Scholar
Ahissar, M., Lubin, Y., Putter-Katz, H., & Banai, K. (2006). Dyslexia and the failure to form a perceptual anchor. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 15581564.Google Scholar
Al-Yagon, M., & Margalit, M. (2001). Special and inclusive education in Israel. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 6, 93112.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Amitay, S., Ben-Yehudah, G., Banai, K., & Ahissar, M. (2002). Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit. Brain, 125, 22722285.Google Scholar
Amitay, S., Ben-Yehudah, G., Banai, K., & Ahissar, M. (2003). Reply to: Visual magnocellular deficits in dyslexia. Brain, 126, e3.Google Scholar
Avishar, G., & Layser, Y. (2000). Evaluating values in special education as change in education [in Hebrew]. Halacha veMa’ashe b’Tichnun Limudim, 15, 97124.Google Scholar
Avissar, G. (2012). Inclusive education in Israel from a curriculum perspective: An exploratory study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27, 3549.Google Scholar
Badcock, N., Ewing, L., Preece, K., Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G., & McArthur, G. (2013, June). Reading and language abilities are related to auditory perceptual anchoring in children with learning difficulties. Poster session presented at the Language in Developmental and Acquired disorders: Future directions, The Royal Society at Chicheley Hall, Chicheley, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Bar-Kochva, I. (2016). An examination of an intervention program designed to enhance reading and spelling through the training of morphological decomposition in word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 163172.Google Scholar
Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (2011). Morphological analysis in learning to read pseudowords in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553581.Google Scholar
Beidas, H., Khateb, A., & Breznitz, Z. (2013). The cognitive profile of adult dyslexics and its relation to their reading abilities. Reading and Writing, 26, 14871515.Google Scholar
Ben-Artzi, E., Fostick, L., & Babkoff, H. (2005). Deficits in temporal-order judgments in dyslexia: Evidence from dichotic stimuli differing spectrally and from dichotic stimuli differing only by perceived location. Neuropsychologia, 43, 714723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children: Evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876893.Google Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176181.Google Scholar
Ben-Simon, A., & Inbar-Weiss, N. (2013). MATAL: A computer-based test battery for the diagnosis of learning disabilities: User guide. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation NITE.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., Deutsch, A., & Liberman, I. Y. (1990). Syntactic competence and reading ability in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 147172.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., & Leshem, H. (1993). On the interaction between phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It’s a two-way street. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 125148.Google Scholar
Ben-Yehudah, G., & Ahissar, M. (2004). Sequential spatial frequency discrimination is consistently impaired among adult dyslexics. Vision Research, 44, 10471063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Yehudah, G., Sackett, E., Malchi-Ginzberg, L., & Ahissar, M. (2001). Impaired temporal contrast sensitivity in dyslexics is specific to retain-and-compare paradigms. Brain, 124, 13811395.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 255371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2015). The interface between genetics and psychology: Lessons from developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282(1806), 20143139.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (2002a). Asynchrony of visual-orthographic and auditory-phonological word recognition processes: An underlying factor in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 1542.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (2002b). The frequency of reading difficulties and characterization of reading disability in students from the fourth grade in the Jewish population in the state of Israel. Report to the chief scientist of the Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z., & Misra, M. (2003). Speed of processing of the visual–orthographic and auditory–phonological systems in adult dyslexics: The contribution of “asynchrony” to word recognition deficits. Brain and Language, 85, 486502.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z., Shaul, S., Horowitz-Kraus, T., Sela, I., Nevat, M., & Karni, A. (2013). Enhanced reading by training with imposed time constraint in typical and dyslexic adults. Nature Communications, 4, 1486.Google Scholar
Chase, C., & Stein, J. (2003). Visual magnocellular deficits in dyslexia. Brain, 126, e2.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., Cuthbert, B., Lewis-Fernández, R., Narrow, W. E., & Reed, G. M. (2017). Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 72145.Google Scholar
Cohen-Mimran, R. (2006). Temporal processing deficits in Hebrew speaking children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 127137.Google Scholar
Conner, P. S. (2013). Novel spoken word learning in adults with developmental dyslexia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.The City University of New York.Google Scholar
Dahan, O., Melzer, Y., & Finkelstein, G. (2011). Changes in the integration of students with learning disabilities in higher education in Israel. In Avishar, G., Laizer, Y., & Reiter, S. (Eds.), Shiluvim (Integration): Education and society systems (pp. 315343). Haifa, Israel: Achva.Google Scholar
Dahan, O., & Russak, S. (2005). A support center for students with learning disabilities – community partnership. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation, 20(2), 8592.Google Scholar
Dai, L., Zhang, C., & Liu, X. (2016). A special Chinese reading acceleration training paradigm to enhance the reading fluency and comprehension of Chinese children with reading disabilities. Frontiers of Psychology, 7, 1937.Google Scholar
D’Amato, R. C., Crepeau-Hobson, F., Huang, L. V., & Geil, M. (2005). Ecological neuropsychology: An alternative to the deficit model for conceptualizing and serving students with learning disabilities. Neuropsychology review, 15, 97103.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 110, 727731.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T., & Bright, W. (Eds.). (1996). The world’s writing systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Filippo, G., Zoccolotti, P., & Ziegler, J. C. (2008). Rapid naming deficits in dyslexia: A stumbling block for the perceptual anchor theory of dyslexia. Developmental Science, 11(6), 4047.Google Scholar
Diringer, D. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Faust, M., Dimitrovsky, L., & Shacht, T. (2003). Naming difficulties in children with dyslexia: Application of the tip of the tongue paradigm. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 203216.Google Scholar
Faust, M., & Sharfstein-Friedman, S. (2003). Naming difficulties in adolescents with dyslexia: Application of the tip-of-the-tongue paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 53, 211217.Google Scholar
Fostick, L., Bar-El, S., & Ram-Tsur, R. (2012). Auditory temporal processing and working memory: Two independent deficits for dyslexia. Psychology Research, 2, 308318.Google Scholar
Fostick, L., Eshcoly, R., Shtibelman, H., Nehemia, R., & Levi, H. (2014). Efficacy of temporal processing training to improve phonological awareness among dyslexic and normal reading students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 17991807.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman., I., & Philosoph, S. (2001). Standards in education systems [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Henrietta Szold Institute.Google Scholar
Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 5868.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829856.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Gabay, S., Schiff, R., Ashkenazi, S., & Henik, A. (2013). Visuospatial attention deficits in developmental dyslexia: evidence from visual and mental number line bisection tasks. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 829836.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Incidental learning of sound categories is impaired in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 73, 131143.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012a). Attentional requirements during acquisition and consolidation of a skill in normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Neuropsychology, 26, 744757.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012b). Dissociation between online and offline learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 279288.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012c). Dissociation between the procedural learning of letter names and motor sequences in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 24352441.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Thiessen, E. D., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Impaired statistical learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 934945.Google Scholar
Gumpel, T. P. (1999). Special education towards the second millennium: Where have we come from and where are we going? [in Hebrew]. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation, 14(2), 7182.Google Scholar
Gumpel, T. P., & Sharoni, V. (2007). Current best practices in learning disabilities in Israel. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 202209.Google Scholar
Heth, I., & Lavidor, M. (2015). Improved reading measures in adults with dyslexia following transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. Neuropsychologia, 70, 107113.Google Scholar
Horowitz-Kraus, T., & Breznitz, Z. (2014). Can reading rate acceleration improve error monitoring and cognitive abilities underlying reading in adolescents with reading difficulties and in typical readers? Brain Research, 1544, 114.Google Scholar
Horowitz-Kraus, T., Cicchino, N., Amiel, M., Holland, S. K., & Breznitz, Z. (2014). Reading improvement in English and Hebrew-Speaking children with reading difficulties after reading acceleration training. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(3), 183201.Google Scholar
Kahta, S., & Schiff, R. (2016). Implicit learning deficits among adults with developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 235250.Google Scholar
Kaminsky, M., Eviatar, Z., & Norman, J. (2002). The timing deficit hypothesis of dyslexia and its implications for Hebrew reading. Brain and Cognition, 48, 394398.Google Scholar
Kasperski, R., Shany, M., & Katzir, T. (2016). The role of RAN and reading rate in predicting reading self-concept. Reading and Writing, 29, 117136.Google Scholar
Katzir, T., Kim, Y. S., Wolf, M., Morris, R., & Lovett, M. W. (2008). The varieties of pathways to dysfluent reading: Comparing subtypes of children with dyslexia at letter, word, and connected text levels of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 4766.Google Scholar
Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261276.Google Scholar
Katzir, T., Markovich, V., Tesler, E., & Shany., M. (2018). Self-regulation and reading comprehension: Self-perceptions, self-evaluations, and effective strategies for intervention. In Meltzer, L. (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (pp. 240262). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Leikin, M., & Assayag Bouskila, O. (2004). Expression of syntactic complexity in sentence comprehension: A comparison between dyslexic and regular readers. Reading and Writing, 17, 801822.Google Scholar
Leikin, M., & Even-Zur, H. (2006). Morphological processing in adult dyslexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 471490.Google Scholar
Lum, J. A., Ullman, M. T., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2013). Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 34603476.Google Scholar
Margalit, M. (1997 ). Report of the public committee to explore the advancement of abilities among Students with learning disabilities. Report submitted to the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.Google Scholar
Margalit, M. (2000). Report of a committee for examination of implementation of the law for special education (Margalit Report). Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
MATAL. (2007). A computer-based test battery for the diagnosis of learning disabilities (2007). Jerusalem: National institute for Testing and Evaluation and the Council of Higher Education in Israel.Google Scholar
Meer, Y., Breznitz, Z., & Katzir, T. (2016). Calibration of self‐reports of anxiety and physiological measures of anxiety while reading in adults with and without reading disability. Dyslexia, 22, 267284.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Y. (2003). A plan of Renovation and equipping a support center building for Learning Disabilities students (unpublished). Jerusalem: National Insurance Institute. Fund for developing services for disabled people.Google Scholar
Miller-Shaul, S. (2005). The characteristics of young and adult dyslexics readers on reading and reading related cognitive tasks as compared to normal readers. Dyslexia, 11, 132151.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2016). From disabilities to learning. System plan for intervention for students with learning disabilities and ADHD. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Oganian, Y., & Ahissar, M. (2012). Poor anchoring limits dyslexics’ perceptual, memory, and reading skills. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1895–1905.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385413.Google Scholar
Ram-Tsur, R., Faust, M., & Zivotofsky, A. Z. (2006). Sequential processing deficits of reading disabled persons is independent of inter-stimulus interval. Vision Research, 46, 39493960.Google Scholar
Ram-Tsur, R., Faust, M., & Zivotofsky, A. Z. (2008). Poor performance on serial visual tasks in persons with reading disabilities impaired working memory? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 437450.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., & Frith, U. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841865.Google Scholar
Raveh, M., & Schiff, R. (2008). Visual and auditory morphological priming in adults with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 221252.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (1990). Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 24(34), 289346.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (1996). Accessing the mental lexicon: Evidence from incompatibility between representation of spoken and written morphology. Linguistics, 34, 12191246.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2006). Double dissociation of functions in developmental dyslexia and dyscalculia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 854867.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., Cohen, M., Ben-Artzi, , Sasson, A., & Ravid, D. (2016). Auditory morphological knowledge among children with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 140154.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2007). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110129.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Representing written vowels in university students with dyslexia compared with normal Hebrew readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 3964.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-speaking university students with dyslexia compared with typically developing grade schoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237253.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2013). Morphological processing in Hebrew-speaking students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 220229. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219412449425.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., Schwartz-Nahshon, S., & Nagar, R. (2011). Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 4463.Google Scholar
Sela, I., & Karni, A. (2012). Differences in learning volitional (manual) and non-volitional (posture) aspects of a complex motor skill in young adult dyslexic and skilled readers. PLoS One, 7(9): e43488. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043488.Google Scholar
Shalev-Leifer, C. (2016). On the link between developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment in Hebrew: Cognitive and psycholinguistic aspects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Shany, M., & Breznitz, Z. (2011). Rate- and accuracy-disabled subtype profiles among adults with dyslexia in the Hebrew orthography. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 889913.Google Scholar
Shany, M., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., Bahat, A., & Zeiger, T. (2006). “Aleph-Taph” – a test for the diagnosis of reading and writing disabilities, based on national Israeli norms. Tel Aviv: Yesod Publishing.Google Scholar
Shany, M., & Share, D. L. (2011). Subtypes of reading disability in a shallow orthography: A double dissociation between accuracy-disabled and rate-disabled reading in Hebrew. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 6484.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2003). Dyslexia in Hebrew. In Goulandris, N. (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons (pp. 208234). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267298.Google Scholar
Share, D. L., & Bar-On, A. (2017). Learning to read a Semitic Abjad: The Triplex model of Hebrew reading development. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219417718198.Google Scholar
Shaul, S. (2014). Visual, auditory and cross modal lexical decision: A comparison between dyslexic and typical readers. Psychology, 5, 18551869. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.516191.Google Scholar
Shovman, M. M., & Ahissar, M. (2006). Isolating the impact of visual perception on dyslexics’ reading ability. Vision Research, 46, 35143525.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. (1983). Dyslexia theory and practice, assessment and enhancement of reading disability. Tel Aviv: Ramot Publication.Google Scholar
Special Education Law. (2002). Instructions, chapter D1 for Special Education Law, 4763 [Correction number 7 for Special Education Law, 1988].Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and language, 9, 182198.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. A., Vogel, G., Sharoni, V., & Dahan, O. (Eds.). (2003). Learning disabilities in higher education and beyond: An international perspective. Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2010). Anchoring the deficit of the anchor deficit: Dyslexia or attention? Dyslexia, 16, 175182.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415438.Google Scholar
Yunay, Y. (1992). The 1988 National Special Education Law. Education of special education students. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C. (2008). Better to lose the anchor than the whole ship. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 244245.Google Scholar

References

Amano, S., & Kondo, T. (1999). Nihongo no goitokusei [Lexical properties of Japanese] (Vols. 1–6, NTT Psycholinguistic Database Series). Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Journal of Memory and Cognition, 10, 565575.Google Scholar
Aylward, E. H., Richards, T. L., Berninger, V. W. et al. (2003). Instructional treatment associated with changes in brain activation in children with dyslexia. Neurology, 61, 212219.Google Scholar
Besner, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1987). Orthographic and phonological code in the oral reading of Japanese Kana. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 335343.Google Scholar
Bowey, J. A., & Patel, R. K. (1988). Metalinguistic ability and early reading achievement. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 367383.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W., Ho, C. S. H., Tsang, S. M., Lee, S. H., & Chung, K. K. H. (2006). Exploring the reading–writing connection in Chinese children with dyslexia in Hong Kong. Reading and Writing, 19, 543561.Google Scholar
Elbro, C., Møller, S., & Nielsen, E. M. (1995). Functional reading difficulties in Denmark. A study of adult reading of common text. Reading and Writing, 7, 257276.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104115.Google Scholar
Fushimi, T., Ijuin, M., Patterson, K., & Tatsumi, I. F. (1999). Consistency, frequency, and lexicality effects in naming Japanese Kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 382407.Google Scholar
Fushimi, T., Komori, K., & Ikeda, M. et al. (2003). Surface dyslexia in a Japanese patient with semantic dementia: Evidence for similarity-based orthography-to-phonology translation. Neuropsychologia, 41, 16441658.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., & Levin, H. (1975). Psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674691.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491528.Google Scholar
Haruhara, N., & Kaneko, M. (2003). The standardized comprehension test of abstract words. Edited by Uno, A.. Tokyo: Intelna-Shuppan,Google Scholar
Haruhara, N., Uno, A., Rankin, Q., & Wydell, T. N. (2014, March). Cognitive abilities and reading/writing attainment in Japanese of Japanese-English bilinguals with monolingual dyslexia in English. Paper presented at the British Dyslexia Association International Conference, Guildford, UK.Google Scholar
Hirose, T. & Hatta, T. (1985). Reading disabilities in Japan: Evidence against the myth of rarity. International Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 249252.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D. W. O., Lee, S. H., Tsang, S. M., & Luan, V. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91, 4375.Google Scholar
Hulme, C. (1988). The implausibility of low-level visual deficits as a cause of children’s reading difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 369374.Google Scholar
Ijuin, M., & Wydell, T. N. (2018). A reading model from the perspective of Japanese orthography: Connectionist approach to the hypothesis of granularity and transparency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(5), 490498. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219417718200.Google Scholar
Japanese National Research Institute of Special Education. (1996). Report C-28: Categorization of primary school children with LD and a study on remediation methods. Tokyo: Japan.Google Scholar
Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723750.Google Scholar
Kaneko, M., Uno, A., Kaga, M. et al. (1997). Developmental dyslexia and dysgraphia: A case report [in Japanese]. No To Hattatsu [Brain and Child Development], 29, 249253.Google Scholar
Kitao, N. (1984). Reading Ability Test TK-1. Tokyo: Taken Press.Google Scholar
Kondo, T., & Wydell, T. N. (2011). Syllable effects during reading 1000 2-Character Kanji words: comparing ON-reading and KUN-reading words. Paper presented at the 14th Japanese Cognitive Neuropsychology Society Annual Conference (24th September 2011), Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
Koyama, M. S., Stein, J. F., Stoodley, C. J., & Hansen, P. C. (2011). Functional MRI evidence for the importance of visual short-term memory in logographic reading. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 539548.Google Scholar
Kusumi, T. (1992). Meta-memory. In Anzai, Y., Ishizaki, S., Otsu, Y., Hatano, G., & Mizogushi, H. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science. Tokyo, Japan: Kyoritsu Shuppan.Google Scholar
Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German–English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315334.Google Scholar
Makita, K. (1968). The rarity of reading disability in Japanese children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 38, 599614.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A. (1985). A cross-language perspective in the relation between temporary memory skills and early reading ability. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 3742.Google Scholar
Mattingley, I. G. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Mattingley, I. G. (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morton, J. & Sasanuma, S. (1984). Lexical access in Japanese. In Henderson, L. (Ed.), Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and Linguistics (25–42). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Muraishi, S. (1972). Acquisition of reading Japanese syllabic characters in pre-school children in Japan. Paper presented at the Twentieth International Congress of Psychology, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Naka, M., & Naoi, H. (1995). The effect of repeated writing on memory. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 23, 201212.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K., Oga, T., Okada, T. et al. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetry emerges at distinct parts of the occipitotemporal cortex for objects, logograms and phonograms: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 28, 521528Google Scholar
National Language Research Institute. (1976). Gendai Shinbun no Kanji [A study of Chinese characters in modern newspapers], The National Language Research Institute Report, 56, Tokyo, Japan: Shuei-shuppan.Google Scholar
National Working Party on Dyslexia in Higher Education. (1999). Dyslexia in higher education: Policy, provision and practice. Hull, UK: University of Hull.Google Scholar
Onose, M. (1987). The effect of tracing and copying practice on handwriting skills of Japanese letters in preschool and first grade children. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 35, 916.Google Scholar
Onose, M. (1988). Effect of the combination of tracing and copying practices on handwriting skills of Japanese letters in preschool and first grade children. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 36, 129134.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., Suzuki, T., & Wydell, T. N. (1996). Interpreting a case of Japanese phonological alexia: The key is in phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 803822.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., Suzuki, T., Wydell, T. N., & Sasanuma, S. (1995). Progressive aphasia and surface alexia in Japanese. Neurocase, 1, 155165.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Demonet, J. F., Fazio, F. et al. (2001). Dyslexia – Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 21652167.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F. et al. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 9196.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., Deng, Y., Zhao, J., & Bi, H. Y. (2015). Magnocellular-dorsal pathway function is associated with orthographic but not phonological skill: fMRI evidence from skilled Chinese readers. Neuropsychologia, 71, 8490. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.024.Google Scholar
Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212218.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C. et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841865.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Havelka, J., Wydell, T. N., Coltheart, M., & Besner, D. (2009). The cross-script length effect: Further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 238246.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1976). Coloured progressive matrices: SETS A, AB, B. Oxford, UK: OPP.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. E., & Wydell, T. N. (2003). The representation and attainment of students with dyslexia in UK higher education. Reading and Writing, 16, 475503.Google Scholar
Saito, H., Kawakami, M., & Matsuda, H. (1995). Kanji kousei ni okeru buhin (bushu)-on’in taiouhyou [Variety of phonetic components of radical types in complex left-right Kanji]. Jouhou Kagaku Kenkyu, 2, 89115.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T., & Makita, K. (1973). Japan. In Downing, J. (Ed.), Comparative reading (pp. 440465). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sakuma, N., Sasanuma, S., Tatsumi, I. F., & Masaki, S. (1998). Orthography and phonology in reading Japanese Kanji words: Evidence from the semantic decision task with homophones. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 26, 7587.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. (1987). Why do Japanese write characters in space? International Journal of Behavioural Development, 10, 135149.Google Scholar
Share, D. L., McGee, R., McKenzie, D., Williams, S. M., & Silva, P. A. (1987). Further evidence relating to the distinction between specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 3544.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Feltcher, J. M., & Escobar, M. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 9981002.Google Scholar
Shibahara, N., Zorzi, M., Hill, M. P., Wydell, T. N., & Butterworth, B. (2003). Semantic effects in word naming: Evidence from English and Japanese Kanji. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 263286.Google Scholar
Siok, W. T., Perfetti, C. A., Jin, Z., & Tan, L. H. (2004). Biological abnormality of impaired reading is constrained by culture. Nature, 431, 7176.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stanhope, N., & Parkin, A. J. (1987). Further explorations of the consistency effect in word and nonword pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 15, 169179.Google Scholar
Stein, J. (2001). The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 1236.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. W., Stigler, J. W., Lucker, G. W. et al. (1982). Reading disabilities: The case of Chinese, Japanese, and English. Child Development, 53, 11641181.Google Scholar
Stoeckel, C., Gough, P. M., Watkins, K. E., Devlin, J. T. (2009). Supramarginal gyrus involvement in visual word recognition. Cortex, 45(9), 10911096.Google Scholar
Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 11401154.Google Scholar
Takebe, T. (1979). Nihongo no hyoki [The Japanese orthography]. Tokyo, Japan: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608631.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107136.Google Scholar
Uno, A., Haruhara, N., Kaneko, M. & Wydell, T. N. (2006–2016). Shougakusei no Yomi kaki Screening Kensa – Screening test of reading and writing for Japanese primary school children (STRAW). Tokyo, Japan: Interuna Shuppan.Google Scholar
Uno, A., Kaga, M., & Inagaki, M. (1995). A specific disorder of Kanji writing observed in a learning-disabled child: Cognitive psychological and neuropsychological analysis. No To Hattatsu [The Brain and Child Development], 27, 395400.Google Scholar
Uno, A., & Kamibayashi, Y. (1998). Learning disabled child showing writing disorders with ADHD: Cognitive neuropsychological investigation about writing disorders. Shouji No Seishin To Shinkei [Developmental Neuropsychiatry], 38(2), 117123.Google Scholar
Uno, A., Wydell, T. N., Haruhara, N., Kaneko, M., & Shinya, N. (2009). Relationship between reading/writing skills and cognitive abilities among Japanese primary-school children: Normal readers versus poor readers (dyslexics). Reading & Writing, 22, 755789.Google Scholar
Wang, J.-J., Bi, H.-Y., Gao, L.-Q., & Wydell, T. N. (2010). The visual magnocellular pathway in Chinese-speaking children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 36273633.Google Scholar
Wei, T.-Q., Bi, H.-Y., Chen, B.-G. et al. (2014). Developmental changes in the role of different metalinguistic awareness skills in Chinese reading acquisition from preschool to third grade. PLoS One, 9(5), e96240.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668680.Google Scholar
Wydell, T. N. (2003). Dyslexia in Japanese and the ‘Hypothesis of Granularity and Transparency’. In Goulandris, A. (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons. London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
Wydell, T. N., & Butterworth, B. (1999). A case study of an English–Japanese bilingual with monolingual dyslexia. Cognition, 70, 273305.Google Scholar
Wydell, T. N., Butterworth, B., & Patterson, K. (1995). The inconsistency of consistency effects in reading: The case of Japanese Kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 11551168.Google Scholar
Wydell, T. N., & Kondo, T. (2003). Phonological deficit and the reliance on orthographic approximation for reading: A follow-up study on an English–Japanese bilingual with monolingual dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 3348.Google Scholar
Wydell, T.N. & Kondo, T. (2015). Behavioral and neuroimaging research of reading: a case of Japanese. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2(4), 339345.Google Scholar
Wydell, T., Patterson, K., & Humphreys, G. (1993). Phonologically mediated access to meaning for Kanji: Is a ROWS still a ROSE in Japanese Kanji? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 491–514.Google Scholar
Wydell, T. N., Vuorinen, T., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. (2003). Neural correlates of letter string length and lexicality during reading in a regular orthography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 7, 10521062.Google Scholar
Yokosawa, K., & Umeda, M. (1988). Process in human Kanji word recognition. Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 377380). Beijing: IEEE.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.Google Scholar

References

Bach, S., Richardson, U., Brandeis, D., Martin, E., & Brem, S. (2013). Print-specific multimodal brain activation in kindergarten improves prediction of reading skills in second grade. NeuroImage, 82, 605615.Google Scholar
Bigos, K. L., & Weinberger, D. R. (2010). Imaging genetics – days of future past. NeuroImage, 53, 804809.Google Scholar
Boets, B., Op de Beeck, H. P., & Vandermosten, M. et al.(2013). Intact but less accessible phonetic representations in adults with dyslexia. Science, 342, 12511254.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read – a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419421.Google Scholar
Cao, F., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing. Brain and Language, 107, 91101.Google Scholar
Cao, F., Yan, X., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Spray, G. J., & Deng, Y. (2017). Neural signatures of phonological deficits in Chinese developmental dyslexia. NeuroImage, 146, 301311.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. (2005). The nature and causes of dyslexia in different languages. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 336355). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W., Ho, C. S.-H., Tsang, S.-M., Lee, S.-H., & Chung, K. K. H. (2003). Reading-related behavioral characteristics of Chinese children with dyslexia: The use of the teachers’ behavior checklist in Hong Kong. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 300323.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W., Ho, C. S.-H., Tsang, S.-M., Lee, S. H., & Chung, K. K. H. (2007). Prevalence, gender ratio and gender differences in reading-related cognitive abilities among Chinese children with dyslexia in Hong Kong. Educational Studies, 33, 249265.Google Scholar
Chang, L.-Y., Chen, Y. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). GraphCom: A multi-dimensional measure of grapheme complexity: A comparison of 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 427449.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Wang, G., & Xia, J. et al. (2014). Stuttering candidate genes DRD2 but not SLC6A3 is associated with developmental dyslexia in Chinese population. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 10, 29.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Pasquarella, A. (2017). Learning to read Chinese. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 3156). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chow, B. W.-Y., Ho, C. S.-H., Wong, S. W.-L., Waye, M. M. Y., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on Chinese language and reading abilities. PLoS One, 6(2), e16640.Google Scholar
Chung, K. K. H., Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W., Tsang, S.-M., & Lee, S.-H. (2010). Cognitive profiles of Chinese adolescents with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16, 223.Google Scholar
Chung, K. K. H., McBride-Chang, C., Wong, S. W. L. et al. (2008). The role of visual and auditory temporal processing for Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 1535.Google Scholar
Compton, D. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225239.Google Scholar
Cope, N., Harold, D., Hill, G. et al. (2005). Strong evidence that KIAA0319 on chromosome 6p is a susceptibility gene for developmental dyslexia. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 76, 581591.Google Scholar
Cui, Z., Xia, Z., Su, M., Shu, H., & Gong, G. (2016). Disrupted white matter connectivity underlying developmental dyslexia: A machine learning approach. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 14431458.Google Scholar
Eden, G. F., VanMeter, J. W., Rumsey, J. M., & Zeffiro, T. A. (1996). The visual deficit theory of developmental dyslexia. NeuroImage, 4, S108S117.Google Scholar
Eden, G. F., Jones, K. M., & Cappell, K. et al. (2004). Neural changes following remediation in adult developmental dyslexia. Neuron, 44, 411422.Google Scholar
Eicher, J. D., & Gruen, J. R. (2013). Imaging-genetics in dyslexia: Connecting risk genetic variants to brain neuroimaging and ultimately to reading impairments. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 110, 201212.Google Scholar
Evans, M. A., Shaw, D., & Bell, M. (2000). Home literacy activities and their influence on early literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 6575Google Scholar
Fan, K. Y., Gao, J. Y., & Ao, X. P. (1984). Pronunciation principles of the Chinese character and alphabetic writing scripts. Chinese Character Reform, 3, 2327.Google Scholar
Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280283.Google Scholar
Galaburda, A. M., LoTurco, J., Ramus, F., Fitch, R. H., & Rosen, G. D. (2006). From genes to behavior in developmental dyslexia. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 12131217.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: II. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 521552.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2003). Why theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 534540.Google Scholar
Handel, Z. (2015). The classification of Chinese: Sinitic (the Chinese language family). In Wang, W. S.-Y. & Sun, C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp. 3444). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, R. (1998). Chinese characters: A genealogy and dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, J. (1917). Congenital word-blindness. London, United Kingdom: Lewis.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W., Chung, K. K., Lee, S. H., & Tsang, S. M. (2007). In search of subtypes of Chinese developmental dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 6183.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., Lee, S.-H., Tsang, S.-M., & Luan, V. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91, 4375.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W., Tsang, S.-M., & Lee, S.-H. (2000). The Hong Kong test of specific learning difficulties in reading and writing (HKT-SpLD). Hong Kong, China: Chinese University of Hong Kong & Education Department, HKSAR Government.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., Tsang, S.-M., & Lee, S.-H. (2002). The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Developmental psychology, 38, 543553.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., & Lai, D. N.-C. (1999). Naming-speed deficits and phonological memory deficits in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 173186.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Law, T. P.-S., & Ng, P. M. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 13, 5779.Google Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Wong, Y.-K., Lo, C.-M. et al. (2014). Helping children with reading disability in Chinese: The response to intervention approach with effective evidence-based curriculum. In Chen, X., Wang, Q., & Luo, Y. (Eds.), Reading development and difficulties in monolingual and bilingual Chinese children (pp. 103124). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hoeft, F., McCandliss, B. D., Black, J. M. et al. (2011). Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 361366.Google Scholar
Hoeft, F., Meyler, A., Hernandez, A. et al. (2007). Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 42344239.Google Scholar
Horwitz, B., Rumsey, J. M., & Donohue, B. C. (1998). Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 89398944.Google Scholar
Hu, W., Lee, H. L., Zhang, Q. et al. (2010). Developmental dyslexia in Chinese and English populations: dissociating the effect of dyslexia from language differences. Brain, 133, 16941706.Google Scholar
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1995). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 7398.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K. et al. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 228.Google Scholar