Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-758b78586c-72lk7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-28T23:12:42.358Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

Michael W. Bauer
German University of Administrative Sciences, Speyer
B. Guy Peters
University of Pittsburgh
Jon Pierre
University of Gothenberg
Kutsal Yesilkagit
Universiteit Leiden
Stefan Becker
German University of Administrative Sciences, Speyer
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration
How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies
, pp. 285 - 325
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abelshauser, W., Fisch, S. & Hoffmann, D. (2016). Wirtschaftspolitik in Deutschland 1917–1990. Oldenburg: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D. & Rockman, B. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aberbach, J. & Rockman, B. (2000). In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of the US Federal Executive. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Abutaleb, Y. & McGinley, L. (2020). Ousted Vaccine Official Alleges he was Demoted for Prioritizing “Science and Safety,” Washington Post, May 5.Google Scholar
Agerberg, M. (2017). Failed Expectations: Quality of Government and Support for Populist Parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 578600. Scholar
Aguilar Camín, H. (2018). A las puertas de AMLO, Nexos, June, 3139.Google Scholar
Aguilar Camín, H. (2019). La destrucción transformadora, Milenio, July 8.Google Scholar
Ahmed, A. & Villegas, P. (2018). López Obrador, an Atypical Leftist, Wins Mexico Presidency in Landslide, The New York Times, July 1.Google Scholar
Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2005). The Lega Nord in the Second Berlusconi Government: In a League of its Own. West European Politics, 28(5), 952–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2008). Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2015). Populists in Power. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, J., Hartley, J., Yates, S. & Hughes, O. (2017). Into the Purple Zone. Deconstructing the Politics/Administration Distinction. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 752–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, O. & Pimenta, G. A. (2020). The First Year of Bolsonaro in Office: Same Old Story, Same Old Song? Revista de Ciencia Política, 40(2), 187213.Google Scholar
Andersen, L. B., Heinesen, E. & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). How Does Public Service Motivation Among Teachers Affect Student Performance in Schools? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 651–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Animal Político. (2018). Equipo de AMLO presume que programas obtuvieron más del 90% de aceptación; Tren Maya, el menos votado. Animal Político, 26 November.Google Scholar
Animal Político. (2019). Gobierno compra 571 pipas por 85 mdd; AMLO garantiza que se estabilizará abasto de gasolina. Animal Político, January 21.Google Scholar
Anonymous. (2019). A Warning. New York, NY: Twelve Books.Google Scholar
Arellano, S. & Mercado, A. (2019). Gertz Manero, fiscal general por 9 años. Milenio, January 19.Google Scholar
Arena Pública. (2019). Advierte Cofece “potencial daño permanente” por adjudicación directa a Banco Azteca. Arena Pública, January 24.Google Scholar
Arenas, N. (2010). La Venezuela de Hugo Chávez: rentismo, populismo y democracia. Nueva Sociedad, 229, 7693.Google Scholar
Arias, L., Barrientos, E., Fócil, M., et al. (2018). Análisis de los Lineamientos de Combate a la Corrupción y Aplicación de una Política de Austeridad Republicana en materia de recorte de plazas, reducción de salarios, cancelación de prestaciones y aumento de la jornada laboral al personal de confianza. Nexos, September.Google Scholar
Arnsdorf, I. (2018). The Shadow Rulers of the VA. ProPublicia, August 7. Available from Scholar
Atkinson, M. M. & Coleman, W. D. (1989). Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies. British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 4767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avelar, I. (2017). A Response to Fabian Santos and Fernando Guarnieri. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 26(2), 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babiš, A. (2016). O Čem Sním Když Náhodou Spím. Prague. Available from Scholar
Bach, M. (1990). Die charismatischen Führerdiktaturen. Drittes Reich und italienischer Faschismus im Vergleich ihrer Herrschaftsstrukturen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Bach, M. & Breuer, S. (2010). Faschismus als Bewegung und Regime. Italien und Deutschland im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badell, D., Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E., Stolfi, F. & Ysa, T. (2019). Too Big to Fail? The Dynamics of EU Influence and Fiscal Consolidation in Italy and Spain (2008–2016). Public Management Review, 21(9), 1307–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. (2002). Transitions from Authoritarianism. The Role of the Bureaucracy. Westport, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Banfield, E. (1958). The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barr, W. (2018). Mueller’s “Obstruction” Theory. Internal Department of Justice memo, June 8. Available from Scholar
Bartha, A., Boda, Z. & Szikra, D. (2020). When Populist Leaders Govern: Conceptualizing Politics and Governance. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 7181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bason, C. (2018). Leading Public Sector Innovation. Co-SCreating for a Better Society, 2nd ed., Bristol: Policy PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batory, A. (2016). Populists in Government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation.Democratization, 23(2), 283303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batory, A. & Svensson, S. (2019). The Use and Abuse of Participatory Governance by Populist Governments. Policy & Politics, 47(2), 227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M. W. & Becker, S. (2020). Democratic Backsliding, Populism and Public Administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M. W. & Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic Autonomy of International Organizations’ Secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. (2017). The Circulation of Oligarchs. In Magyar, B. & Vásárhelyi, J., eds., Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 111–27.Google Scholar
Bekke, H. A. G. M., Perry, J. L. & Toonen, T. A. J. (eds.) (1996). Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington & Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bellé, N. (2012). Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–53.Google Scholar
Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, A. & Feldmann, S. (2007). Strategic Appointments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, N. (2019). Peter Strzok Accuses the Federal Government of Violating his Rights. Politico, December 30. Available from: Scholar
Bickerton, C. & Invernizzi Accetti, C. (2017). Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(2), 186206. Scholar
Bickerton, C. & Invernizzi Accetti, C. (2018). Techno-Populism as a New Party Family: The Case of the Five Star Movement and Podemos. Contemporary Italian Politics, 10(2), 132–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, T. (2018). Now They are Blaming Populists for Measles. Spiked, August 27. Available from Scholar
Blake, A. (2020). Trump’s Government Full of Temps. Washington Post, February 21.Google Scholar
Blanchar, C. (2017). Colau crea 2.000 plazas de funcionario para reducir un 70% los interinos. El País, December 14. Available from Scholar
Blanco, I., Salazar, Y. & Bianchi, I. (2019). Urban Governance and Political Change under a Radical Left Government: The Case of Barcelona. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(1), 1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. & Sancino, A. (2019). Disruptive Democracy: The Clash Between Techno-Populism and Techno-Democracy. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomberg. (2016). Venezuela’s Military Needs to Get Out of Business. Generals and Soldiers are Profiting from a Dysfunctional Economy. Bloomberg, May 6. Available from Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1987). The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Boin, A., Stern, E. & Sundelius, B. (2016). The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boräng, F., Cornell, A., Grimes, M. & Schuster, C. (2018). Cooking the Books: Bureaucratic Politicization and Policy Knowledge. Governance, 31(1), 726. Scholar
Bordignon, F. & Ceccarini, L. (2013). Five Stars and a Cricket. Beppe Grillo Shakes Italian Politics. South European Society and Politics, 18(4), 427–49. Scholar
Borgonovi, E. & Ongaro, E. (2011). The Civil Service in Italy. In Massey, A., ed., The International Handbook of Civil Service Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 103–24.Google Scholar
Borins, S. (2018). Public Sector Innovation in a Context of Radical Populism. Public Management Review, 20(12), 1858–71. Scholar
Boswell, C. (2008). The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, C. (2018). Manufacturing Political Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozóki, A. (2011). Occupy the State: The Orbán Regime in Hungary. Debate: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 19(3), 649–63.Google Scholar
Bozóki, A. (2015). Broken Democracy, Predatory State, and Nationalist Populism. In Krastev, P. & van Till, J., eds., The Hungarian Patient: Social Opposition to an Illiberal Democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 336.Google Scholar
Bracher, K. D. (1983). Nationalsozialistische Diktatur 1933–1945. Eine Bilanz. Düsseldorf: Droste (Bonner Schriften zur Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 21).Google Scholar
Bracher, K. D., Sauer, W. & Schulz, G. (1962). Die nationalsozialistische Machtergreifung. Studien zur Errichtung des totalitären Herrschaftssystems in Deutschland 1933/34, 2nd ed. Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Brannen, K. (2020). Unredacted Ukraine Documents Reveal Extent of Pentagon’s Legal Concerns. Just Security, January 2. Available from Scholar
Bratton, M. & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa. Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, C. (2019). El hampa del periodismo. Letras Libres, September.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. & Gates, S. (1997). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, J. & Gates, S. (2002). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage. Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public, 4th ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Briceño, H. (2017). La diversidad ideológica en la formación de las políticas públicas durante el chavismo. In Spiritto, F., ed., Decisiones de gobierno en Venezuela. Apuntes para su comprensión histórica y de políticas públicas. Caracas: Publicaciones Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar
Bruhn, K. (2013). To Hell with your Corrupt institutions! AMLO and Populism in Mexico. In Mudde, C. & Rovira, C., eds., Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat Or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88112.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talks, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Buchheim, C. (2008). Das NS-Regime und die Überwindung der Weltwirtschaftskrise in Deutschland. Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 56(3), 381414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, H.-J. (2005). Das soziale Elend des Hugo Chávez: Die Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik der Fünften Republik. In Diehl, O. & Muno, W., eds., Venezuela unter Chávez – Aufbruch oder Niedergang? Frankfurt: Vervuert, pp. 99126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, C. M. & Kogan, V. (2016). The Politics of Potholes: Service Quality and Retrospective Voting in Local Elections. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 203–14.Google Scholar
Buštíková, L. & Guasti, P. (2018). The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism. East European Politics and Societies, 33(2), 302–30. Scholar
Cairney, P. (2016). The Politics of Evidence-Based Policymaking. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Calzada, I. (2018). (Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona. Sustainability, 10(9), 3252. Scholar
Camarena, S. (2018). Rocío Nahle vs. la CNH y la CRE. El Financiero, November 14.Google Scholar
Camarotti, G. (2020). Carta aberta com crítica a Aras é lida em reunião de conselho do MP; procurador-geral reage. G1. Available from Scholar
Canova, A., Herrera Orellana, L., Rodríguez Ortega, R. & Graterol Stefanelli, G. (2014). El TSJ al servicio de la Revolución. La toma, los números y los criterios del TSJ venezolano (2004–2013). Caracas: Editorial Galipán.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 216. Scholar
Capano, G. (2003). Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990s. Public Administration, 81(4), 781801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, J. (1988). Government Without Administration. State and Civil Service in Weimar and Nazi Germany. Oxford: Clarendon Press of Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 5467. Scholar
Cardullo, P. & Kitchin, R. (2019). Being a “Citizen” in the Smart City: Up and Down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Particition. GeoJournal, 84, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Casal, J. (2001). El constitucionalismo venezolano y la Constitución de 1999. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho UCAB, 56, 137–80.Google Scholar
Casar, M. A. (2019a). El gran benefactor. Nexos, March.Google Scholar
Casar, M. A. (2019b). Estado y gobierno: ¿la disminución? Nexos, September.Google Scholar
Cassese, S. (1993). Hypotheses on the Italian Administrative System. West European Politics, 16(3), 316–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, S. (1999). Italy’s Senior Civil Service: An Ossified World. In Page, E.C. & Wright, V., eds., Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cejudo, G. M. (2017). Policy Analysis in the Mexican Federal Government. In Méndez, J. L. & Dussauge-Laguna, M. I., eds., Policy Analysis in Mexico, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cejudo, G. M. & Gómez-Álvarez, D. (2018). La austeridad y la podadora. Nexos, September 1.Google Scholar
Chaguaceda, A. (2019). México: contexto y antecedentes de la cuarta transformación. Diálogo Político, June 21.Google Scholar
Chandler, R. C. (1983). The Problem of Moral Reasoning in American Public Administration: The Case for a Code of Ethics. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 32–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, K., Betrand, N. & McGraw, M. (2020). Impeachment Witnesses Ousted Amid Fears of Trump Revenge Campaign. Politico, February 7. Available from Scholar
Christensen, J. (2017). The Power of Economists within the State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chwalisz, C. (2015). The Populist Signal. London: Policy Network.Google Scholar
Chwalisz, C. (2017). The People’s Verdict. London: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Císař, O. & Štětka, V. (2016). Czech Republic. The Rise of Populism from the Fringes to the Mainstream. In Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., Esser, F., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C., eds., Populist Political Communication in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 285–99.Google Scholar
Civil Service Act. (2015). Ustawa z dnia 30 grudnia 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy o służbie cywilnej oraz niektórych innych ustaw (Dz.U. 2016, poz. 34).Google Scholar
Clark, Charles. (2017). Deconstructing the Deep State. Government Executive, September 17. Available Scholar
Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. & Whiteley, P. (2004). Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. & Whiteley, P. (2009). Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J. & Stoker, G. (2018). The Good Politician. Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Zachary. (2020). Whistleblower accuses Trump Appointees of Downplaying Russian Interference and White Supremacist Threat. CNN, September 9. Available from: Scholar
Collier, D. (1979). Overview of the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian Model. In Collier, D., ed., The new authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1932.Google Scholar
Conze, E., Frei, N., Hayes, P., Zimmermann, M. & Weinke, A. (2010). Das Amt und die Vergangenheit: Deutsche Diplomaten im Dritten Reich und in der Bundesrepublik, 4th ed. Munich: Blessing.Google Scholar
Cook, B. (2020). Restraining the Unitary Executive: A Regime Ethics Basis for Administrator Defiance of Presidential Directives. Public Integrity, 22(4), 305–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., et al. (2018). V-Dem Codebook v8. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Cordiplan. (1990). El Gran Viraje: Lineamientos generales del VIII Plan de la Nación, Presentación al Congreso Nacional. Caracas.Google Scholar
Cornell, A., Knutsen, C. & Teorell, J. (2020). Bureaucracy and Growth. Comparative Political Studies, online first. Available from Scholar
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “Participation” Models, Meanings and Practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–83. Scholar
Corrales, J. (2020a). Democratic Backsliding through Electoral Irregularities: The Case of Venezuela. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 109, 4165.Google Scholar
Corrales, J. (2020b). Authoritarian Survival: Why Maduro Hasn’t Fallen. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 3953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrales, J. & Penfold, M. (2011). Dragon in the Tropics. Hugo Chávez and the Political Economy of Revolution in Venezuela. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Cortés, N. & Soto, E. (2019). Eliminan al primer órgano autónomo. El Heraldo de México. March 15.Google Scholar
Costa Pinto, A. (2004). Fascist Era Elites (3). Salazar’s Ministerial Elite, 1933–44. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 3(2), 103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, J. (2018). El “error de Texcoco” puede marcar a AMLO. Proceso, November 5.Google Scholar
ČTK. (2015). Radní schválili změny na magistrátu. Bude se i propouštět. Pražský deník, March 17. Available from Scholar
ČTK. (2016). Krnáčová je v čele Prahy dva roky, nyní řeší metropolitní plán. Pražský deník, November 25. Available from Scholar
Cultura Colectiva (2019). Think Tanks y las otras polémicas de Notimex, la agencia oficial del gobierno de AMLO. CC News, May 20.Google Scholar
D’Albergo, L. (2019). Campidoglio, la giunta Raggi vara il rimpasto: fuori Baldassarre, Marzano, Castiglione e Gatta. E apre al Pd. Repubblica.It, September 23. Scholar
D’Elia, Y. & Cabezas, L. (2008). Las Misiones Sociales en Venezuela. Caracas: ILDIS.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2012). The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (1984). Cognitive Mobilisation and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Journal of Politics, 46(1), 264–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H., Nutley, S. & Smith, P. (eds.) (2000). What Works? Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Dawsey, J. (2020). In Speech, Mulvaney Says Republicans Are Hypocritical on Deficits. Washington Post, February 19.Google Scholar
De la Torre, C. (2017). Populism in Latin America. In Rovira-Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. A., Ochoa, P., & Ostiguy, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195213.Google Scholar
De la Torre, C. & Ortiz Lemos, A. (2016). Populist Polarization and the Slow Death of Democracy in Ecuador. Democratization, 23(2), 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Rosa, R. & Quattromani, D. (2019). Ruling Rome with Five Stars. Contemporary Italian Politics, 11(1), 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, D. & Vannucci, A. (2007). Corruption and Anti-corruption: The Political Defeat of “Clean Hands” in Italy. West European Politics, 30(4), 830–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denhardt, R. B. & Denhardt, J. V. (2002). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–59.Google Scholar
Denhardt, R. B. & Perkins, J. (1976). The Coming of Death of Administrative Man. Public Administration Review, 36(4), 379–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamant, A. (1968). Tradition and Innovation in French Administration. Comparative Political Studies, 1(2), 251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, D. (2020a). Trump Officials Interfered with CDC Reports on COVID-19. Politico, September 11. Available from Scholar
Diamond, D. (2020b). Trump Administration Shakes up HHS Personnel Office after Tumultuous Hires. Politico, September 21. Scholar
Diamond, L. (2016). Democracy in Decline: How Washington Can Reverse the Tide. Foreign Affairs, 95(4), 151.Google Scholar
Di Mascio, F. (2014). Exploring the Link Between Patronage and Party Institutionalization: An Historical-Institutional Analysis of the Italian Transition. Democratization, 21(4), 678–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Mascio, F., Feltrin, P. & Natalini, A. (2019). I sindacati del settore pubblico e la riforma Madia della pubblica amministrazione. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 14(2), 213–46.Google Scholar
Di Mascio, F., Galli, D., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E. & Stolfi, F. (2017). Learning-shaping Crises: A Longitudinal Comparison of Public Personnel Reforms in Italy, 1992–2014. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 19(2), 119–38.Google Scholar
Di Mascio, F., Maggetti, M. & Natalini, A. (2018). Exploring the Dynamics of Delegation Over Time: Insights from Italian Anticorruption Agencies (2003–2016). Policy Studies Journal, 48(2), 367400. Scholar
Di Mascio, F. & Natalini, A. (2014). Austerity and Public Administration: Italy between Modernization and Spending Cuts. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(12), 1634–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Mascio, F. & Natalini, A. (2015). Fiscal Retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing Patterns of Public Management in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Public Management Review, 17(1), 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Mascio, F. & Natalini, A. (2016). Ministerial Advisers Between Political Change and Institutional Legacy: The Case of Italy. Acta Politica, 51(4), 517–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A. & Cacciatore, F. (2019). The Political Origins of Transparency Reforms: Insights from the Italian Case. Italian Political Science Review, 49(3), 211–27.Google Scholar
Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E. & Stolfi, F. (2019). Influence of the European Semester on National Public Sector Reforms under Conditions of Fiscal Consolidation: The Policy of Conditionality in Italy 2011–2015. Public Policy and Administration, 35(2), 201–23. Scholar
Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A. & Stolfi, F. (2013). The Ghost of Crises Past: Analyzing Reform Sequences to Understand Italy’s Response to the Global Crisis. Public Administration, 91(1), 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Palma, G. (1979). The Available State: Problems of Reform. West European Politics, 2(3), 149–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOF (2018). Decreto por el que se expide la Ley Federal de Remuneraciones de los Servidores Públicos, Reglamentos de los artículos 75 y 127 de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y se adiciona el Código Penal Federal. Diario Oficial de la Federación, November 5.Google Scholar
Dolejší, V. & Prchal, L. (2016). Zrušte Trafiky, Volte Profíky, Hlásala Krnáčová Před Volbami. Dnes Rozdává Funkce Za Loajalitu. Hospodářské Noviny, May 18. Available from Scholar
Dostal, V., Győri, L., Meseznikov, G., Przybylski, W. & Zgut, E. (eds.) (2018). Illiberalism in the V4: Pressure Points and Bright Spots. Budapest: Political Capital and Friedrich Naumann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1965). A Theory of Bureaucracy. American Economic Review, 55(1/2), 439–46.Google Scholar
Drabik, P. (2020). Fundusz Inwestycji Lokalnych. Miliardy tylko dla stronników PiS? Available from Scholar
Drápalová, E. & Wegrich, K. (2020). Technocratic Populism and Subnational Governance. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duque, D. & Smith, A. E. (2019). The Establishment Upside Down: A Year of Change in Brazil. Revista de Ciencia Política, 39(2), 165–89.Google Scholar
Durant, R. F. (1992). The Administrative Presidency Revisited: Public Lands, the BLM, and the Reagan Revolution, New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Durant, R. F. & Ali, S. B. (2012). Repositioning American Public Administration? Citizen Estrangement, Administrative Reform, and the Disarticulated State. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 278–89.Google Scholar
Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2011). The Challenges of Implementing Merit Based Personnel Policies in Latin America: Mexico’s Civil Service Reform Experience. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(1), 5173.Google Scholar
Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2015). Mitos y realidades de los Organismos Constitucionales Autónomos. Revista de Administración Pública, 50(138), 225–45.Google Scholar
Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. & Casas, A. (in press). Patronage in the Mexican Public Sector. In Panizza, F., Peters, B. G., & Ramos, C., eds., Patronage in Transition Across Latin America. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Eatwell, R. & Goodwin, M. (2018). National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
Ebinger, F., Veit, S. & Fromm, N. (2019). The Partisan–Professional Dichotomy Revisited: Politicization and Decision‐making of Senior Civil Servants. Public Administration, 97(4), 861–76. Scholar
Edelson, C. (2016). Power Without Constraint: The Post 9/11 Presidency and National Security. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
EIU – The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2017). Democracy Index 2017: Free Speech Under Attack. Available from Scholar
Eizaguirre, S., Pradel-Miquel, M. & García, M. (2017). Citizenship Practices and Democratic Governance: “Barcelona En Comú” as an Urban Citizenship Confluence Promoting a New Policy Agenda. Citizenship Studies, 21(4), 425–39. Scholar
El Financiero (2018). Regulador de energía recorta a 367 empleados, el 60% de su personal. El Financiero, December 17.Google Scholar
El Heraldo de México (2019a). Nadie puede ganar más que el presidente, asegura López Obrador. El Heraldo de México, May 6.Google Scholar
El Heraldo de México (2019b). SEP anuncia el despido del 30% de empleados de confianza. El Heraldo de México, January 17.Google Scholar
El Nacional (2015). Siete días, El Nacional, October 25. Retrieved from [link defunct at publication].Google Scholar
El País (2006). López Obrador se proclama “presidente legítimo” de México. El País, November 20.Google Scholar
El Sol de México (2019). Yo tengo otros datos. AMLO desestima reporte de Bank of America. El Sol de México, January 16.Google Scholar
Elchardus, M. & Spruyt, B. (2016). Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology. Government and Opposition, 51(1), 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellner, S. & Tinker Salas, M. (eds.) (2007). Venezuela: Hugo Chávez and the Decline of an “Exceptional Democracy.” Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
ENCOVI (2020). Proyecto Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Vida de la Población Venezolana), Presentación de resultados 2014–2018. Retrieved from [link defunct at publication].Google Scholar
Erdmann, G. (2013). Neopatrimonialism and Political Regimes. In Cheeseman, N., Anderson, D., & Scheibler, A., eds., Routledge Handbook of African Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 5969.Google Scholar
Esmark, A. (2017). Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Technocracy? An Old Framework for a New Analysis of Administrative Reforms in the Governance Era. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 501–16. Scholar
Espinasa, R. (2006). El auge y el colapso de Pdvsa a los treinta años de la nacionalización. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 112(1), 147–82.Google Scholar
etcétera (2019). Justifica AMLO compra de pipas sin licitación; no tenemos problemas de conciencia, asegura. Etcétera, January 21.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. & Terrey, N. (2016). Co-design with Citizens and Stakeholders. In Stoker, G. & Evans, M., eds., Evidence-based Policymaking in the Social Sciences. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 243–62.Google Scholar
Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D. & Skocpol, T. (eds.) (1985). Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Expansión Política (2019). Gonzalo Hernández Licona es relevado de Coneval. Expansión Política, July 22.Google Scholar
Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis, Public Organization Review, 10(3), 245258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fears, D. (2017). Zinke says his Workers are Disloyal. They say his Personnel Moves Break the Law. The Washington Post, September 27.Google Scholar
FH. (2020). Freedom House: Freedom in the World Report. Available from Scholar
Fiaschetti, M. E. & Sacchettoni, I. (2019). Roma, esposto dell’ex ad di Ama «Devi cambiare il bilancio». Le parole che imbarazzano la sindaca Raggi. Corriere della Sera. April 18. Scholar
Fischer, E. & Wittmann, R. (eds.) (2015). Geschichte des deutschen Buchhandels im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fittipaldi, E. (2019). Rifiuti, Virginia Raggi: «Modifica Il Bilancio». Ma Il Manager Dice Di No e Viene Licenziato. L’Espresso, April 18. Available from Scholar
Folha de São Paulo (2004a). 54% Acreditam Que Lula Trabalha Muito. Folha de São Paulo. Available from Scholar
Folha de São Paulo (2004b). Há Um Viés Autoritário No Governo Lula? Folha de São Paulo. Available from Scholar
Follesdal, A. & Hix, S. (2006). Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Föllmer, M. (2001). Der “kranke Volkskörper.” Industrielle, hohe Beamte und der Diskurs der nationalen Regeneration in der Weimarer Republik. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 27(1), 4167.Google Scholar
Fonseca, D. (2018). AMLO: Yo o el diluvio. The New York Times, December 2.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2011). Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Freedom House. (2020). Report: “Nations in Transit 2020,” p. 25. Available from Scholar
Frenk, J. & Gómez, O. (2019). Salud: manual de una contrarreforma reaccionaria. Nexos, December.Google Scholar
Frieden, T., Koplan, J., Satcher, D. & Besser, R. (2020). We Ran the CDC. No President Ever Politicized Its Science the Way Trump Has. The Washington Post, July 14.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, 16, 318.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2006). The End of History and The Last Man. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gailmard, S. & Patty, J. W. (2007). Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 873–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, S. & Patty, J. (2013). Learning While Governing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2018). Anti-pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
García, I. (2018). ¿Y el presupuesto anticorrupción? Reporte índigo, December 19.Google Scholar
Garrido, S. (2018). Los municipios de la consulta del aeropuerto. Nexos, October.Google Scholar
Germani, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, Fascism and National Populism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Golden, M. M. (1992). Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect: Bureaucratic Responses to Presidential Control During the Reagan Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 2962.Google Scholar
Golden, M. M. (2000). What Motivates Bureaucrats? Politics and Administration During the Reagan Years. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Hermosillo, R. (2019a). Réquiem por Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera. El Universal, June 11.Google Scholar
Gómez-Hermosillo, R. (2019b). Secuela de la desaparición de Prospera. El Universal, June 25.Google Scholar
Gonzales-Ocantos, E., De Jonge, C. K., Meléndez, C., Osorio, J. & Nickerson, D. W. (2012). Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 202–17.Google Scholar
González, L. (2018). ¿Esquivel, el próximo gobernador del Banxico? El Economista, November 26.Google Scholar
González, S. (2019). Conferencias matutinas de AMLO no deben ser una homilía: Coparmex. La Jornada, April 14.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. & Schulkin, D. (2020). Timeline of the Coronavirus Pandemic and US Response. Just Security, April 13. Available from Scholar
Goodsell, C. T. (2019). The Anti-Public Administration Presidency: The Damage Trump Has Wrought. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 871–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görtemaker, M. & Safferling, C. (eds.) (2014). Die Rosenburg. Das Bundesministerium der Justiz und die NS-Vergangenheit – eine Bestandsaufnahme, 2nd ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gössel, K.-D. (2002). Beamtentum im Nationalsozialismus. In Friedensberger, M., Gössel, K.-D., & Schönknecht, E., eds., Die Reichsfinanzverwaltung im Nationalsozialismus. Darstellung und Dokumente. Bremen: Ed. Temmen, pp. 95142.Google Scholar
Gotto, B. (2006). Polykratische Selbststabilisierung. Mittel- und Unterinstanzen in der NS-Diktatur. In Hachtmann, R., ed., Hitlers Kommissare. Sondergewalten in der nationalsozialistischen Diktatur. Göttingen: Wallstein (Beiträge zur Geschichte des Nationalsozialismus, 22), pp. 2850.Google Scholar
Gottwaldt, A. B. & Bartelsheim, U. (2009). Eisenbahner gegen Hitler. Widerstand und Verfolgung bei der Reichsbahn 1933–1945. Wiesbaden: Marix Verlag.Google Scholar
Gowen, A., Eilperin, J., Guarino, B. & Ba Tran, A. (2020). Science Ranks Grow Thin in Trump Administration. The Washington Post, January 23.Google Scholar
Graff, G. (2020). 25 years after Oklahoma City, domestic terrorism is on the rise. Wired, April 19. Available from Scholar
Green, J. & Jennings, W. (2017). The Politics of Competence. Parties, Public Opinion and Voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, B. & Casaleggio, G. (2011). Siamo in Guerra per Una Nuova Politica. Milan: Chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Gualmini, E. (2002). The Case of Italy. In Peters, B.G. and Braans, M., eds., Rewards for High Public Office in Europe and Northern America. London: Routledge, pp. 96110.Google Scholar
Guarino, B. (2019). USDA relocation has delayed key studies and millions in funding, employees say. Washington Post, October 2.Google Scholar
Hachtmann, R. (2011). Elastisch, dynamisch und von katastrophaler Effizienz – zur Struktur der Neuen Staatlichkeit des Nationalsozialismus. In Reichardt, S. & Seibel, W., eds., Der prekäre Staat. Herrschen und Verwalten im Nationalsozialismus. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, pp. 2974.Google Scholar
Hajnal, G. (2016). Illiberal or Simply Unorthodox? Public Administration Education in Hungary and Europe: A Comparative Perspective. Teaching Public Administration, 34(2), 206–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, G., & Csengődi, S. (2014). When Crisis Hits Superman: Change and Stability of Political Control and Politicization in Hungary. Administrative Culture, 15(1), 3957.Google Scholar
Hajnal, G. & Rosta, M. (2016). A New Doctrine in the Making? Doctrinal Foundations of Sub-National Governance Reforms in Hungary (2010–2014). Administration & Society, Online first.Google Scholar
Hanley, S. & Sikk, A. (2016). Economy, Corruption or Floating Voters? Explaining the Breakthroughs of Anti-Establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe. Party Politics, 22(4), 522–33. Scholar
Hardin, R. (2006). Trust, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Hart, D. K. (1984). The Virtuous Citizen, the “Honorable bureaucrat,” and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 44(1), 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, R. P. (2020). Donald Trump and the Return of the Paranoid Style. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 348–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havlík, V. (2019). Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism, 69(6), 369–84.Google Scholar
Heady, F. (1996). Configurations of Civil Service Systems. In Bekke, H. A. G. M., Perry, J. L., & Toonen, T. A. J., eds., Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington & Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 207–26.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. (2018). Are More Federal Employees Leaving under a Trump Administration? Federal News Network, March 26. Available from Scholar
Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hehl, U. V. (2001). Nationalsozialistische Herrschaft, 2nd ed. Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, A. S. (2018). Strategies of Mainstream Parties Towards their Right-wing Populist Challengers. West European Politics, 41(2), 287309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, A. (2019). Gobierno notifica a Metlife cancelación de seguro de gastos médicos. El Universal, January 2.Google Scholar
Hetland, G. (2017). From System Collapse to Chavista Hegemony. The Party Question in Bolivarian Venezuela. Latin American Perspectives, 44(1), 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2018). Methods of Elite Identification. In Best, H. & Higley, J., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (2012). The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in Target World. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–21.Google Scholar
Hood, C. & Lodge, M. (2006). The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty – and Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002). Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, W. & Power, T. J. (2019). Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 6882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P. (2019). Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hustedt, T. & Salomonsen, H. H. (2014). Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Politicization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(4), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüttenberger, P. (1976). Nationalsozialistische Polykratie. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 2(4), 417–42. Available from Scholar
Ichino, P. (2006). I nullafacenti. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar (2018). ANO Dělá Veletoče v Dozorčích Radách. Rozdávají Se Trafiky, Tvrdí Opozice. iDNES.Cz, April 9. Available from Scholar
Illés, G., Körösényi, A. & Metz, R. (2018). Broadening the Limits of Reconstructive Leadership: Constructivist Elements of Viktor Orbán’s Regime-Building Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(4), 790808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impacto redacción (2019). Yo tengo otros datos, el desempleo a disminuido: AMLO, Impacto, May 17.Google Scholar
INE (2020). (Instituto Nacional de Estadística), Poverty indicators Database 1998–2013. Available from www.ine.gob.veGoogle Scholar
Ingraham, P. W. (1995). The Foundation of Merit: Public Service in American Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, H., de Leon, P. & Schneider, A. (2016). Conclusion: Public Policy Theory and Democracy: The Elephant in the Corner. In Peters, B. G. & Zittoun, P., eds., Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy: Theories, Controversies and Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175200.Google Scholar
Iturbe, E. (2017). La institucionalidad administrativa de la revolución bolivariana y las políticas públicas. In Urbaneja, D., ed., Desarmando el modelo. Las transformaciones del sistema político venezolano desde 1999. Caracas: ABCEdiciones, pp. 195224.Google Scholar
Jilke, S. & Baekgaard, M. (2020). The Political Psychology of Citizen Satisfaction: Does Functional Responsibility Matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 130–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juárez, M. (2019). Masones reclaman que evangélicos hagan reparto de la Cartilla Moral. La Razón, July 8.Google Scholar
Kaltwasser, C. (2015). Explaining the Emergence of Populism in Europe and the Americas. In de La Torre, C., ed., The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives. Lexington, KY: University Press, pp. 189227.Google Scholar
Kam, C. & Trussler, M. (2017). At the Nexus of Observational and Experimental Research, Specification, and Analysis of Experiments with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Political Behavior, 39(4), 789815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Eric. (2019). Mulvaney: Relocating Offices is a “Wonderful Way” to Shed Federal Employees. Government Executive, August 15. Available from Scholar
Kenny, P. D. (2017). Populist and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kettl, D. (2017). Can Governments Earn Our Trust? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Kickert, W. & Ongaro, E. (2019). Influence of EU (and IMF) on Domestic Consolidation and Reform: Introduction. Public Management Review, 21(9), 1261–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, E.H. (2016). Managing Commercialised Media Attention in Complex Governance Networks: Positive and Negative Effects on Network Performance, Policy and Politics, 44(1), 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C. (1999). Explaining Cross-national Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy, 19(1), 113–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstytucja (1997). Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. (Dz.U. 1997, nr 78, poz. 483).Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Mair, P., & Spirova, M. (eds.) (2012). Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopińska, G. (2018). Stanowiska publiczne jako łup polityczny. Polityka personalna w okresie od 16 listopada 2015 do 31 października 2017 roku. Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.Google Scholar
Kordt, E. (1938). The Public Servant in Germany. Public Administration, 16(2), 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkut, U. (2012). Liberalization Challenges in Hungary. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, J. (2015). Hungary’s U-Turn. Capitalism and Society, 10(1), 124.Google Scholar
Körösényi, A. & Patkós, V. (2017). Liberal and Illiberal Populism. The Leadership of Berlusconi and Orbán. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 8(38), 315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, É. & Hajnal, G. (2017). Hungary’s Central State Administration 1990–2014. In Nemec, J. & Spacek, D., eds., 25 Years of Public Administration Developments and Reforms in the V4 Region. Brno: Masarik University, pp. 4883.Google Scholar
Krastev, I. (2017). After Europe. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauze, E. (2006). El mesías tropical. Letras Libres, June.Google Scholar
Krnáčová, A. (2014). Adriana Krnáčová: Žvanit Neumím. Já to Prostě Udělám. ANO Bude Líp (blog). July 10. Available from Scholar
Kubicka-Żach, K. (2020). Urzędnicy: Państwo też powinno chronić miejsca pracy. Available from, 500386.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kulcsár, K. (2001). Deviant Bureaucracies. Public Administration in Eastern Europe and in the Developing Countries. In Farazmand, A., ed., Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration. Public Administration and Public Policy 94, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, pp. 941–52.Google Scholar
Kuller, C. (2013). Bürokratie und Verbrechen: Antisemitische Finanzpolitik und Verwaltungspraxis im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland. Munich: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullgren, I. (2019). White House Memo Details Divide-and-Conquer Labor Strategy. Politico. September 4. Available from Scholar
La Razón (2018). Confirmado: Economía desaparece ProMéxico e Inadem. La Razón, December 20.Google Scholar
La redacción Proceso (2019a). Inai ordena a la SEP informar el costo de las 100 universidades “Benito Juárez.” Proceso, June 17.Google Scholar
La redacción Proceso (2019b). Memorándum contra reforma educativa, fácilmente impugnable: José Ramón Cossío. Proceso, April 17.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1991). The Organization of Society, Administrative Strategies, and Policy Networks. In Czada, R. M. & Windhoff-Héritier, A., eds., Political Choice: Institutions, Rules, and the Limits of Rationality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 121–55.Google Scholar
Levine, D. (1978). Venezuela since 1958: The Consolidation of Democratic Politics. In Linz, J. & Stepan, A., eds., The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 82109.Google Scholar
Levine, D. (1989). Venezuela: The Nature, Sources, and Prospects of Democracy. In Diamond, L., Linz, J., & Lipset, S., eds., Democracy in Developing Countries, Volume 4: Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 247–89.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. (2018). Latin America’s Shifting Politics: Democratic Survival and Weakness. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 102–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018a). How Democracies Die. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018b). How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. E. (2007). Testing Pendleton’s Premise: Do Political Appointees Make Worse Bureaucrats? The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1073–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. E. (2008). The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2015). The Politics and Consequences of Performance Measurement. Policy and Society, 34(1), 112. Scholar
Lewis, M. (2018). The Fifth Risk. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Light, P. (2017). The True Size of Government: Tracking Washington’s Blended Workforce 1984–2015. Volcker Alliance Issue Paper. Available from Scholar
Lindblom, C. (1990). Inquiry and Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. (1990). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 5190.Google Scholar
Linz, J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy. Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, expanded ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lipton, E., Goodnough, A., Shear, M., et al. (2020). The CDC Waited “Its Entire Existence for this Moment.” What Went Wrong? New York Times, June 3.Google Scholar
Lipton, E., Haberman, M. & Mazzetti, M. (2019). Inside Ukraine Aid Freeze: An 84-day Clash of Wills. New York Times, December 30.Google Scholar
Lipton, E., Vogel, K. & Friedman, L. (2018). EPA Officials Sidelined After Questioning Scott Pruitt. The New York Times, April 5.Google Scholar
López, A. (2018). Vocero de AMLO: no desaparecen oficinas de prensa, sólo se reducen. La Razón, September 3.Google Scholar
López, C. (2019). En el Gobierno se acabaron los “chapulines fifís,” declara AMLO. La Razón, February 12.Google Scholar
López, I. (2018). Los “hoyos negros” de la consulta por el aeropuerto en Texcoco o Santa Lucía. Forbes, December 31.Google Scholar
López-Ayllón, S. (2019). El memorando y el orden constitucional. Milenio, April 17.Google Scholar
López-Obrador, A. M. (2018). Mensaje del Presidente de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Reprinted in Revista IAPEM, 101, 155–68.Google Scholar
Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. & Stoker, G. (2006). Diagnosing and Remedying the Failings of Official Participation Schemes: The CLEAR Framework. Social Policy and Society, 5(2), 281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, E. (2017). The Retreat of Western Liberalism. New York, NY: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Lührmann, A. & Lindberg, S. (2019). A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New About It? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lührmann, A., Grahn, S., Morgan, R., Pillai, S. & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). State of the World 2018: Democracy Facing Global Challenges. Democratization, 26(6), 895915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lührmann, A., Maerz, S. F., Grahn, S., et al. (2020). Autocratization Surges – Resistance Grows. Democracy Report 2020. Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem). Gothenburg. Available from Scholar
Lührmann, A., Medzihorsky, J., Hindle, G. & Lindberg, S.I. (2020). New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party. Briefing Paper #9, October 26 2020. Available from Scholar
Madureira, N. L. (2007). Cartelization and Corporatism: Bureaucratic Rule in Authoritarian Portugal, 1926–45. Journal of Contemporary History, 42(1), 7996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maerz, S. F., Lührmann, A., Hellmeier, S., Grahn, S. & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). State of the World 2019: Autocratization Surges – Resistance Grows. Democratization, 27(6), 909–27. Scholar
Mainwaring, S. & Pérez-Liñán, A. (2014). Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., Bizzarro, F. & Petrova, A. (2018). Party System Institutionalization, Decay and Collapse. In Mainwaring, S., ed., Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay and Collapse. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing Out of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Majer, D. (1987). Grundlagen des nationalsozialistischen Rechtssystems: Führerprinzip, Sonderrecht, Einheitspartei. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (2001). Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance. European Union Politics, 2(1), 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, M. (2018). AMLO vs. Banxico: jugando con fuego. El Universal, September 19.Google Scholar
Maldonado, M. (2019). Crisis en la CNBV; 42 renuncias y contando. El Universal, October 7.Google Scholar
Mandavilli, A. (2020). CDC Testing Guidance was Published against Scientist’s Objections. The New York Times, September 17.Google Scholar
Manow, P. (2018). Die Politische Ökonomie des Populismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Manow, P. (2020). (Ent-)Demokratisierung der Demokratie. Berlin: Edition Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
March, H. & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2018). Barcelona: From Corporate Smart City to Technological Sovereignty. In Karvonen, A., Cugurullo, F., & Caprotti, F., eds., Inside Smart Cities. Place, Politics, and Urban Innovation. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 229–43.Google Scholar
Martínez, L. (2018). ¿Qué dice el decreto de la Ley de Salarios Máximos de los funcionarios públicos? El Economista, November 5.Google Scholar
Mattei, P. (2007). Italian Democracy Under Threat? The Spoils System in Historical Perspective. In Page, E.C. & Wright, V., eds., From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, pp. 8198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. (2019). The Making of the Fox News White House. The New Yorker, March 4.Google Scholar
Mazur, S. & Hausner, J. (2010). Aparat administracyjny państwa jako agent zmiany. In Morawski, W., ed., Modernizacja Polski: struktury, agencje, instytucje. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne; Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego, pp. 382401.Google Scholar
Mazur, S. (ed.) (2020). Public Administration in Central Europe: Ideas as Causes of Reforms. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, S., Możdżeń, M. & Oramus, M. (2018). The Instrumental and Ideological Politicisation of Senior Positions in Poland’s Civil Service and its Selected Consequences. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, 11(1), 6389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental Methodology in Political Science. Political Analysis, 10(4), 325–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. (1993): Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition. In Perry, J. L., ed., Research in Public Administration. Vol. 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 135.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J. & O’Toole, L. J. (2006). Bureaucracy in a Democratic State. A Governance Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mejía, X. & González, I. (2019). Germán Martínez renuncia al IMSS; denuncia política de recortes y despidos. Excélsior, May 22.Google Scholar
Mele, V. & Ongaro, E. (2014). Public Sector Reform in a Context of Political Instability: Italy 1992–2007. International Public Management Journal, 17(1), 111–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez, J. L. (1997). The Latin American Administrative Tradition. In Shafritz, J. M., ed., International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 12541261.Google Scholar
Méndez, J. L. & Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2017). Introduction. In Méndez, J. L. & Dussauge-Laguna, M. I., eds., Policy Analysis in Mexico. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mény, Y. & Surel, Y. (eds.) (2002). Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino, M. (2013). La captura de los puestos públicos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 58(219), 135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, W., Puhle, H.-J., Croissant, A., Eicher, C. & Thiery, P. (2003). Defekte Demokratie. Band 1: Theorie. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metro News. (2016). Raggi: noi facciamo quello che diciamo. Metro news, June 14. Available from Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, J. H. (2011). The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe after Accession. Governance, 24(2), 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, J. H. & Jáger, K. (2012). Party Patronage in Hungary: Capturing the State. In Kopecký, P., Mair, P., & Spirova, M., eds., Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. & Veen, T. (2012). Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 28(1), 422. Scholar
Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York, NY: Hearst Library.Google Scholar
Middendorf, S. (2015). Finanzpolitische Fundamente der Demokratie? Haushaltsordnung, Ministerialbürokratie und Staatsdenken in der Weimarer Republik. In Müller, T. B. & Tooze, A., eds., Normalität und Fragilität: Demokratie nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition HIS, pp. 315–43.Google Scholar
Miranda, P. (2019). Recortes presupuestales afectan a 3 mil 500 pacientes del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. El Universal, May 24.Google Scholar
Miranda, F. & Guerrero, K. (2020). Gobierno federal desaparece subsecretarías como medida de austeridad ante covid-19. Milenio. August 28.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (1985). The Politicized Presidency. In Chubb, J. & Peterson, Paul E., eds., The New Direction in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 235–71.Google Scholar
Mommsen, H. (1973). Die Stellung der Beamtenschaft in Reich, Ländern und Gemeinden in der Ära Brüning. Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 21(2), 151–65.Google Scholar
Mommsen, H. (2010). Beamtentum im Dritten Reich. Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Monroy, L. A. (2019). Políticas públicas: Transferencias con pies de barro. Nexos, September 1.Google Scholar
Morales, A. (2019). Aunque me digan mesiánico voy a purificar el país: AMLO, El Universal, January 21.Google Scholar
Morales, A. (2020). AMLO pide a funcionarios “lealtad ciega” al proyecto de transformación. El Universal, September 24.Google Scholar
Morales, A. & Zavala, M. (2019). AMLO da estructura a superdelegados. El Universal, March 20.Google Scholar
Moreno, D. (2019). Derecho a saber. Reforma, January 20.Google Scholar
Morgan, E. P. & Perry, J. L. (1988). Re-orienting the Comparative Study of Civil Service Systems. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 8(3), 8495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, L. & Tarchi, M. (1996). The Dissatisfied Society: The Roots of Political Change in Italy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(1), 4163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosca, L. (2014). The Five Star Movement: Exception or Vanguard in Europe? The International Spectator, 49(1), 3652. Scholar
Mosca, L. & Tronconi, F. (2019). Beyond Left and Right: The Eclectic Populism of the Five Star Movement. West European Politics, 42(6), 1258–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy. Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritzen, P. E. & Svara, J. (2012). Leadership at the Apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Homeland Security and the US Public Management Policy Agenda. Governance, 18(2), 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. & Roberts, A. (2010). The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence: The Bush Administration and the Exhaustion of the Politicized Presidency. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 572–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–63. Scholar
Mudde, C. (2016). On Extremism and Democracy in Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. (2017). “Populism.” Three Conversations about the Rise of Populism in the West. Background papers prepared for the GAC/POR “Fast Talk” Teleconference on Populism in the West & the International Order.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2017). Populism. An Ideational Approach. In Kaltwasser, C. Rovira, Taggart, P., Ocoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2747.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2019). The Far Right Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muédano, M. (2019). Gobierno Federal sumó, en siete meses, casi medio millón de despidos. La silla rota. October 1.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2016a). Was ist Populismus?, Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2016b). What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2017). What Is Populism? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Muno, W. (2005). Öl und Demokratie – Venezuela im 20. Jahrhundert. In Diehl, O. & Muno, W., eds., Venezuela unter Chávez – Aufbruch oder Niedergang? Frankfurt: Vervuert, pp. 1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muno, W. (2015). ALBA, UNASUR und CELAC. In Grimmel, A. & Jakobeit, C., eds., Regionale Integration. Erklärungsansätze und Analysen zu den wichtigsten Integrationszusammenschlüssen in der Welt. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 412431.Google Scholar
Nery, N., Seabra, C. & Franco, B. M. (2011). Cúpula Do PT Defende Controle Da Mídia. Folha de São Paulo. Available from Scholar
Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S. & Verhey, L. (2013). Civil Servants and Politics: The Delicate Balance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL and New York, NY: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Nistotskaya, M. & Cingolani, L. (2016). Bureaucratic Structure, Regulatory Quality, and Entrepreneurship in a Comparative Perspective: Cross-Sectional and Panel Data Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 519–34. Scholar
Norden, D. (2008). Assessing Venezuelan Political-Military Relations Under Chávez. Nueva Sociedad, 213(8), 170–87.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, E. A. (1981). On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (ed.) (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, F. & Melo, C. R. (2017). Impeachment, Crisis Política y Democracia En Brasil. Revista de Ciencia Política, 37(2), 281304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nützenadel, A. (ed.) (2017). Das Reichsarbeitsministerium im Nationalsozialismus. Verwaltung – Politik – Verbrechen. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O Antagonista. (2020). Com só 12 inscritos, plano de Aras para a Lava Jato fracassa. O Antagonista. Available from Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (1979). Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (2011). Nuevas reflexiones acerca de la democracia delegativa. In O’Donnell, G., Iazzetta, O., & Quiroga, H., eds., Democracia Delegativa. Buenos Aires: Prometeo, pp. 1935.Google Scholar
OECD (2001). Citizens as Partners. OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Decision-making. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2017). Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust, OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. Scholar
O’Leary, R. (2006). The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerilla Government. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
O’Leary, R. (2017). The Ethics of Dissent: Can President Trump Survive Guerrilla Government? Administrative Theory & Praxis, 39(2), 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, R. (2020). The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, M. (2020). Veja a íntegra do abaixo-assinado que questiona nomeação de Aras. Congresso em Foco. Available from Scholar
O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 4552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, J. (2016). Subversion in Institutional Change and Stability: A Neglected Mechanism. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongaro, E. (ed.) (2006). Le Agenzie Pubbliche: Modelli Istituzionali ed Organizzativi. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Ongaro, E., (ed.) (2008). L’organizzazione dello Stato tra autonomia e policy capacity. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Ongaro, E. (2009). Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal, Spain. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongaro, E. (2010). The Napoleonic Administrative Tradition and Public Management Reform in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain. In Painter, M. & Peters, B.G., eds., Tradition and Public Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 174–90.Google Scholar
Ongaro, E. (2011). The Role of Politics and Institutions in the Italian Administrative Reform Trajectory. Public Administration, 89(3), 738–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongaro, E. (2018). The Napoleonic Tradition in Public Administration. In Thompson, W., ed., Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ongaro, E. (2020). Philosophy and Public Administration: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongaro, E. & Bellé, N. (2010). Réforme de la fonction publique et introduction de la rémunération liée aux performances en Italie: évidence empirique, interprétations et enseignements. Revue Française d’Administration Publique, 132(2010), 817–39.Google Scholar
Ongaro, E., Ferré, F., Galli, D. & Longo, F. (2016). Italy: Set Along a Neo-Weberian Trajectory of Administrative Reform? In Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Bezes, P., eds., Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 185–93.Google Scholar
Ongaro, E. & Kickert, W. (2020). EU-driven Public Sector Reforms. Public Policy and Administration, 35(29), 117–34. Scholar
Ongaro, E. & Valotti, G. (2008). Public Management Reform in Italy: Explaining the Implementation Gap. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 174204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppelt, R. (2016). Zeptali Jsme Se Opozice, Jak Hodnotí Vládnutí Primátorky Adriany Krnáčové,, November 3. Available from Scholar
Otto, P. & Thuong Ly, N. (2018). Stavěla Bych, Až Bych Brečela. Ale Nemohu, Říká Primátorka Adriana Krnáčová. E15.Cz, March 28. Available from Scholar
Overeem, P. (2005). The Value of the Dichotomy: Politics, Administration, and the Political Neutrality of Administrators. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paczocha, J. (2018). Raport Partia w Państwie. Bezprecedensowa wymiana kadr w administracji rządowej i jej legislacyjne podstawy. Warsaw: FOR.Google Scholar
Pakulski, J. (2016). Crumbling Elite Consensus and the Illiberal Turn in Poland. In Pakulski, J., ed., The Visegrad Countries Crisis. Warsaw: Collegium Civitas, pp. 5165.Google Scholar
Panizza, F., Peters, B. G., & Ramos Larraburu, C. R. (2019). Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. Public Administration, 97(1), 147–61. Scholar
Pantoja, S. (2017). AMLO defiende alianza con el PES y asegura que respeta la diversidad sexual. Proceso, December 15.Google Scholar
Pap, A. L. (2017). Democratic Decline in Hungary: Law and Society in an Illiberal Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (2002). Populism, the Democratic Question, and Contemporary Governance. In Mény, Y. & Surel, Y., eds., Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 4561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Populizm, demokracja i współczesny model rządzenia. In Mény, Y. & Surel, Y., eds., Demokracja w obliczu populizmu. Warsaw: Oficyna Naukowa, pp. 86–7.Google Scholar
Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populists in Power. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 7084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, M. C. (2020). El Desdén por la Administración Pública. In Cilano, Johanna & Sánchez, Ramiro (eds.), El México de la 4T. Transparencia Electoral – GAPAC, pp. 147164.Google Scholar
Paredes, M. (2018). Sectur desparece el Consejo de Promoción Turística de México. Excélsior, December 7.Google Scholar
Parker, A. & Rucker, , P. (2017). Trump Taps Kushner to Lead a SWAT Team to Fix Government with Business Ideas. Washington Post, March 26. Scholar
Paxton, F. (2020). Towards a Populist Local Democracy? The Consequences of Populist Radical Right Local Government Leadership in Western Europe. Representation, 56(6), 411–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfold-Becerra, M. (2007). Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez’s Misiones. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(4), 6384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez de Acha, L. (2019). El desgobierno de López Obrador. The New York Times, May 27.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, A. (2018). Impeachment or Backsliding? Threats to Democracy in the Twenty-first Century. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 33(98), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrone, M. (2020). Nuovo Concorsone al Comune Di Roma: 1.512 Posti a Bando in Primavera. Sole 24 Ore, 2020. Available from Scholar
Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A. & Wise, L.R. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. (1988). Comparing Public Bureaucracies: Problems of Theory and Method. Tuscaloosa, AL: Alabama University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2008). The Napoleonic Tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 118–32.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2013). Politicization of the Civil Service: What is it and Why do we Care? In Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S., & Verhey, L., eds., Civil Servants and Politics: The Delicate Balance. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2018a). The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration, 7th ed. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2018b). Comparative Politics and Comparative Policy Studies: Making the Linkage. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(1), 88100.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, 4th ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2020). Administrative Traditions: Understanding the Roots of Contemporary Administrative Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2017). Two Roads to Nowhere: Appraising 30 Years of Public Administration Research. Governance, 30(1), 1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2019). Populism and Public Administration: Confronting the Administrative State. Administration and Society, 51(10), 1521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2020). A Typology of Populism: Understanding the Different Forms of Populism and Their Implications. Democratization, 27(6), 928946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G., Ramos, C. & Alba, C. (Forthcoming). Handbook of Public Administration in Latin America. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Pettypiece, S. (2020). DHS Faces Coronavirus with Scores of Vacancies and a Leadership Vacuum. NBC News, March 16. Available from Scholar
Pezzi, M. G. (2019). “Mafia Capitale”: Judicial and Symbolic Constructions of the New Italian Corruption. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 24(3), 512–30. Scholar
Pierre, J. & Peters, B. G. (2004). Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences. In Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J., eds., The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1325.Google Scholar
Pierre, J. & Peters, B. G. (2017). The Shirking Bureaucrat: A Theory in Search of Evidence? Policy & Politics, 45(2), 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2017). American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy. British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S105–19. ScholarPubMed
PiS (2014). Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwości 2014. “Zdrowie Praca Rodzina.” Available from Scholar
PiS (2019). Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwości 2019 “Polski Model Państwa Dobrobytu.” Available from Scholar
Plumer, B. & Davenport, C. (2019). Science under Attack: How Trump Is Sidelining Researchers and their Work. The New York Times, December 28.Google Scholar
Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2019). Bureaucratic Polarization, Partisan Attachments, and the Limits of Public Agency Legitimacy: The Venezuelan Armed Forces under Chavismo. Latin American Research Review, 54(2), 476498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
políticomx (2018). Santa Lucía gana consulta de AMLO: ahí será el NAICM. políticomx, October 28.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1962). The Open Society and Its Enemies, 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Postel, C. (2007). The Populist Vision, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pracodawcy (2018). Pracodawcy apelują do prezydenta o ratowanie dialogu. Available from Scholar
Pracodawcy, R. P. (2019). Siedem grzechów głównych stanowienia prawa w Polsce, Edycja III, kwiecień 2018 r. – październik 2019 r. Available from Scholar
Pražský deník. (2015). Radní schválili změny na magistrátu. Bude se i propouštět. Pražský deník, March 17. Available from Scholar
Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. B. (1984). Implementation, 3rd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A. & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and Development. Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puente, K. (2020). Mexico: The Rise of Presidential Populism and the Decline of Congress. In Khmelko, I., Stapenhurst, F., & Mezey, M., eds., Legislative Decline in the 21st Century. London: Routledge, pp. 158–69.Google Scholar
Radwan, A. (2018). Zamiast specjalisty dyrektor. To skutek reformy PiS w służbie cywilnej, “Gazeta Prawna,” August 27. Available from,specjaliste-zwolnic-a-na-jego-miejscu-posadzic-dyrek-tora.htmlGoogle Scholar
Radwan, A. (2020). Kuźnia urzędników wykuwa coraz słabiej. Spada liczba kandydatów do KSAP. Available from, kuznia-urzednikow-wykuwa-coraz-slabiej-spada-liczba-kandydatow-do-ksap.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, L. (2020). Efectos de un contexto de erosión democrática en las estrategias de reforma a las instituciones de la administración pública: el caso de la Secretaría de Bienestar, 2018–2020. CIDE, MPA Dissertation.Google Scholar
Rauch, J. & Evans, P. (2000). Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 4971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebentisch, D. (1989). Verfassungswandel und Verwaltungsstaat vor und nach der nationalsozialistischen Machtergreifung. In Heideking, J., Hufnagel, G. & Knipping, F., eds., Wege in die Zeitgeschichte. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Gerhard Schulz. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 123150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redacción (2019). En materia educativa, López Obrador dice que prefiere la justicia sobre las leyes. El Economista, April 17.Google Scholar
Redacción Animal Político (2019a). AMLO otorga el 74% de los contratos por adjudicación directa al igual que EPN y Calderón. Animal Político, July 8.Google Scholar
Redacción Animal Político (2019b). Por qué AMLO dice que hay una mafia de la ciencia y cómo impacta en las contrataciones en Conacyt. Animal Político, February 15.Google Scholar
Redacción/LP (2019). Recortes a Conacyt pueden colapsar centros de investigación en México: investigadores. Aristegui Noticias, May 22.Google Scholar
Reichardt, S. & Seibel, W. (2011). Radikalität und Stabilität. Herrschen und Verwalten im Nationalsozialismus. In Reichardt, S. & Seibel, W., eds., Der prekäre Staat. Herrschen und Verwalten im Nationalsozialismus. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, pp. 728.Google Scholar
Rein, L. & Philip, A. (2017). Help Wanted: Why Republicans Won’t Work for the Trump Administration. Washington Post, June 27.Google Scholar
Rein, L., Dawsey, J. & Olorunnipa, T.. (2020). Trump’s Historic Assault on the Civil Service Was Four Years in the Making. Washington Post, October 23.Google Scholar
Report (2019). Report CG36(2019)13 final 2 2019. April Local and Regional Democracy in Poland. Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by member States of the European Charter of Local Self-Government (Monitoring Committee). David BARO RIBA, Andorra (L, NR) Pascal MANGIN, France (R, EPP/CCE). Available from Scholar
Reporte índigo (2019). Banco Azteca tendrá manejo de tarjetas del bienestar por invitación de AMLO y sin contrato. Reporte índigo, January 17.Google Scholar
Resh, W.G. (2015). Rethinking the Administrative Presidency: Trust, Intellectual Capital, and Appointee-careerist Relations in the George W. Bush Administration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rey, J. (1976). Ideología y Cultura Política: El Caso del Populismo Latinoamericano. Revista Politeia, 5, 123–50.Google Scholar
Rey, J. (2009). Temas de formación sociopolítica: El sistema de partidos venezolano, 1830–1999. Caracas: UCAB Publications.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. (2019). Shaking Hands with Hitler: The Politics‐Administration Dichotomy and Engagement with Fascism. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 267–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockman, B. A. (2019). Bureaucracy between Populism and Technocracy. Administration and Society, 51(10), 1546–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, A. (2018). AMLO critica al INAI, INEE y organismos energéticos: son ejemplo de obesidad burocrática. Proceso, December 7.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to Do About It). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189209. Scholar
Rodríguez-Pose, A., Lee, N., & Lipp, C. (2020). Golfing with Trump: Social Capital, Decline, Inequality and the Rise of Populism in the US. Papers in Economic Geography and Spatial Economics, Paper No. 14, 136.Google Scholar
Rogers, K. (2020). Trump Now Claims he Always Knew the Coronavirus Would Be a Pandemic. New York Times, March 17.Google Scholar
Rohr, J. A. (1986). To Run A Constitution: The Legitimacy of The Administrative State. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Rosagel, S. (2019). AMLO llama “hampa del periodismo” a columnistas. El Imparcial, May 23.Google Scholar
Rosas, O. (2019). Con 18, 147 siervos, AMLO construye un censo bajo sospecha de sesgo. Expansión Política. July 24.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D. (2008). The Politics–Administration Dichotomy in US Historical Context. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 5760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. & Taggart, P. (2016). Dealing with Populists in Government: A Framework for Analysis. Democratization, 23(2), 201–20.Google Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Espejo, P. O. & Ostiguy, P. (eds.) (2017). Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio, L. (2019). Paso a paso … . Reforma, October 13.Google Scholar
Rucker, P. & Costa, R. (2017). Bannon vows a daily fight for “deconstruction of the administrative state.” Washington Post, February 23.Google Scholar
Rucker, P. & Leonnig, C. (2020). A Very Stable Genius: Donald J. Trump’s Testing of America. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Runciman, D. (2018). How Democracy Ends. London: Profile books.Google Scholar
Rupnik, J. (2007). Is East-Central Europe Backsliding? From Democracy Fatigue to Populist Backlash. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 1725.Google Scholar
Sager, F. & Rosser, C. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of Modern Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1136–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, F. & Guarnieri, F. (2016). From Protest to Parliamentary Coup: An Overview of Brazil’s Recent History. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 25(4), 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, S. (2000). Cities in a World Economy, 2nd ed. New York, NY: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Savoie, D. J. (1999). Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Savoie, D. J. (2008). Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiring, G. (2019). Dependent Development and Authoritarian State Capitalism: Democratic Backsliding and the Rise of the Accumulative State in Hungary. Geoforum, Online first. Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1971). Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1972). La Portugalización de Brasil. Estudios Internacionales, 5(19), 355.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1975). Corporatism and Public Policy in Authoritarian Portugal. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Scholz-Paulus, S., Strobel, B., Vedder, S. & Veit, S. (2020). Die Politisch-Administrative Elite der Weimarer Republik am 1. September 1920. Randauszählungen zu Elitestudien des Fachgebiets Public Management der Universität Kassel, volume 2. Kassel.Google Scholar
Schröter, E. (1993). Was trennt Bürokraten in einer vereinten Bürokratie? Einstellungen und Werthaltungen (Ost- und West-) Berliner Verwaltungsführungskräfte. In Glaeßner, G.-J., ed., Der lange Weg zur Einheit. Berlin: Dietz. S. 247–74.Google Scholar
SDPnoticias. (2018). Critica AMLO altos sueldos y pocos resultados en el INAI. SDPnoticias, December 7.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebők, M., Kubik, B. & Molnár, C. (2017). A törvények formális minősége: Empirikus vázlat. In Boda, Z. & Szabó, A., eds., Trendek a magyar politikában 2. A Fidesz és a többiek: pártok, mozgalmak, politikák. Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó, pp. 285310.Google Scholar
Senado Federal. (2014). Na Câmara, Decreto de Dilma é Chamado de Autoritário e Antidemocrático. Senado Federal. Available from Scholar
SGI (2018). Governance. Sustainable Policies. Democracy. Policy Performance and Governance Capacities in the OECD and EU. Sustainable Governance Indicators 2018. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
SGI (2019). Governance. Sustainable Policies. Democracy. Poland Report. Sustainable Governance Indicators 2019. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Shalders, A. (2020). A ofensiva contra a Lava Jato que “une” esquerdistas, bolsonaristas e Augusto Aras. BBC News Brasil, August 6. Available from Scholar
Shaw, R. & Eichbaum, C. (2018). Introduction: Ministers, Minders and Mandarins. In Shaw, R. & Eichbaum, C., eds., Ministers, Minders and Mandarins. An International Study of Relationships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 114.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. & Bonchek, M. S. (2007). Analyzing Politics – Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions, New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Silberman, B. (1993). Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Herzog Márquez, J. (2018). La tenacidad de López Obrador. El País, June 26.Google Scholar
Sina, Y. (2016a). Quattro pilastri per 58 azioni, Roma presenta la sua strategia per diventare resiliente. RomaToday, July 18. Available from Scholar
Sina, Y. (2016b). Comune, l’annuncio di Raggi: “Pronta la riforma della macchina amministrativa.” RomaToday, November 10. Available from Scholar
Sina, Y. (2016c). Raggi ridisegna il Campidoglio: ruotano i dirigenti, spuntano nuovi dipartimenti. RomaToday, December 10. Available from Scholar
Skaaning, S.-E. (2020). Waves of Autocratization and Democratization: A Critical Note on Conceptualization and Measurement. Democratization, 110, online first. Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia & China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research. In Evans, P. B., Rueschemayer, D., & Skocpol, T., eds., Bringing the State Back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonntag, H. (1988). Estado y desarrollo sociopolítico en Venezuela. Síntesis, 5, 97142.Google Scholar
Sontheimer, K. (1999). Die Kurze Demokratie. Der Spiegel, 53(33), 6473.Google Scholar
Sotiropoulos, D. (2004). Southern European Public Bureaucracies in Comparative Perspective. West European Politics, 27(3), 405–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, M. W. (2019).