Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-qghsn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-03T14:15:19.602Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

5 - Cultural Material: Rectification, Criminal Justice, and Dispute Resolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

James A. R. Nafziger
Affiliation:
Willamette University, Oregon
Robert Kirkwood Paterson
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Alison Dundes Renteln
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Claims for the return or restitution of cultural heritage are of central importance on both domestic and international levels of cultural heritage law. On the domestic level, for example, the historical and cultural identity of tribal and other indigenous groups may be at stake in efforts to reclaim significant artifacts from museums, art galleries, and private collections. On the international level, the recovery of stolen cultural material, whose value is estimated to be more than $3 billion annually, requires substantial diligence by customs officials and cooperation among governments, private institutions, and individuals.

Obligations to return cultural material to territories of origin date back at least to Greek and Roman times. Until recently, those obligations were addressed almost exclusively to military-related problems of plunder, the spoils of warfare, and occupation. For example, the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, followed by the reparation provisions of the Treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain after the First World War, underscored the illegality of military plunder and articulated the remedy for victim states. Twenty-five years later, during the Second World War, a leading scholar, urging moderation in dealing with the Germans after the war, referred to the Treaty of Saint Germain. Its provisions for the return of historical and cultural material took account, on a reciprocal basis, of the cultural heritage of both the victor, Italy, and the loser, Austria:

[The Treaty] stated, however incompletely, the reasonable principle that historical material belongs, wherever possible, to the land of its birth; and though it might prove highly impracticable to carry this principle through to its ultimate conclusion, the mere fact of its enunciation on reciprocal terms, while the smoke of the battle and revenge still clung to Europe, was a noble signal of growth.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cultural Law
International, Comparative, and Indigenous
, pp. 389 - 613
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rigby, DouglasCultural Reparations and a New Western Tradition 13 Am. Scholar273 1944Google Scholar
Merryman, John HenryCultural Property Internationalism 12 Int'l J. Cultural Prop11 2005Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel V.The International Movement of Cultural Objects 12 Int'l J. Cultural Prop225 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riding, AlanBetween France and Mexico: A Cultural CrisisInt'l Herald Trib 1982 1Google Scholar
Schmidt, FennaCodes of Museum Ethics and the Financial Pressures on Museums 11 Museum Management and Curatorship257 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forder, CarolineThe Civil Liability of Conservators under Dutch LawLa Restauration Des Objets D'Art 63 74 1995Google Scholar
Ferguson, R.B.The Legal Status of Non-Statutory Codes of PracticeJ. Bus. L 12 19 1988Google Scholar
Griffiths, AntonyCodes of Conduct 2 Art, Antiquity and Law173 1997Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Buruchac, Margaret M.NAGPRA from the Middle Distance: Legal Puzzles and Unintended ConsequencesImperialism, Art and Restitution193Merryman, John Henry 2006Google Scholar
Haas, JonathanThe Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Prospects for New Partnerships between Museums and Native American Groups 25 Ariz. St. L.J253 1992Google Scholar
Harding, SarahJustifying Repatriation of Native American Cultural Property 72 Ind. L.J723 1997Google Scholar
Trope, Jack F.Echo-Hawk, Walter R.The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Background and Legislative History 24 Ariz. St. L.J35 1992Google Scholar
Peregoy, Robert M.The Legal Basis, Legislative History, and Implementation of Nebraska's Landmark Reburial Legislation 24 Ariz. St. L.J329 1992Google Scholar
In, James RidingWithout Ethics and Morality: A Historical Overview of Imperial Archaeology and American Indians 24 Ariz. St. L.J11 1992Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P.The Reality of Repatriation: Reaching Out to Native AmericansFed. Arch 1995 2Google Scholar
Merrill, William L.Ladd, Edmund J.Ferguson, T.J.The Return of the Ahayu:da: Lessons for Repatriation from Zuni Pueblo and the Smithsonian Institution 35 Current Anthrop523 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, RennardImplementing the National Policy of Understanding, Preserving, and Safeguarding the Heritage of Indian Peoples and Native Hawaiians: Human Rights, Sacred Objects, and Cultural Patrimony 24 Ariz. St. L.J175 1992Google Scholar
Nafziger, James A.R.The New International Legal Framework for the Return, Restitution or Forfeiture of Cultural Property 15 N.Y. U. J. Int'l L. & Pol789 1983Google Scholar
Marsh, Gene A.Walking the Spirit Trail: Repatriation and Protection of Native American Remains and Sacred Cultural Items 24 Ariz. St. L.J79 1992Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B.The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather than States 32 Am. U. L. Rev16 1982Google Scholar
Wilson, Diana DrakeCalifornia Indian Participation in Repatriation: Working toward Recognition 21 Am. Indian Culture & Res. J191 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsosie, RebeccaIndigenous Peoples’ Claims to Cultural Property: A Legal Perspective 21 Museum Anthrop5 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, BarbaraAn Epimethean View of the Future at the Peabody MuseumFed. Arch 1995 18Google Scholar
Pickering, RobertJantz, R.L.Look Again before Repatriating: Avoiding a Moral and Legal MorassFed. Arch 1995 36Google Scholar
McKeown, C. TimothyInside the Act: Confessions of a BureaucratFed. Arch 1995 4Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P.Nordby, Larry V.Implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act 24 Ariz. St. L.J217 1992Google Scholar
Suagee, Dean B.Tribal Voices in Historic Preservation: Sacred Landscapes, Cross-Cultural Bridges, and Common Ground 21 Vt. L. Rev145 1996Google Scholar
Sullivan, MartinA Museum Perspective on Repatriation: Issues and Opportunities 24 Ariz. St. L.J283 1992Google Scholar
Worl, RositaNAGPRA: Symbol of a New TreatyFed. Arch 1995 28Google Scholar
Coughlin, E.K.Returning Indian RemainsChron. Higher EducA8 1994Google Scholar
Stumpf, Gary D.A Federal Land Management Perspective on Repatriation 24 Ariz. St. L.J303 1992Google Scholar
Nason, J.D.Wright, R.K.Sharing Heritage: Native American ExhibitsMuseum News 1994 43Google Scholar
Ayau, Edward HalealohaRooted in Native SoilFed. Arch 1995 24Google Scholar
Johnson, Ralph W.Haensly, Sharon I.Fifth Amendment Takings Implications of the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act 24 Ariz. St. L.J158 1992Google Scholar
Bender, Paul1990 Arizona Repatriation Legislation 24 Ariz. St. L.J391 1992Google Scholar
MacEachern, ScottCultural Resource Management and Africanist Archaeology 75 Antiquity866 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, CatherineAboriginal Claims to Cultural Property in Canada: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Repatriation Debate 17 Am. Ind. L. Rev457 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisluk, Anna J.DEA Operation Nets 3 Pictures 16 IFAR Rep 1995 6Google Scholar
Merryman, John HenryNafziger, James A.R.The Private International Law of Cultural Property in the United States 42 Am. J. Comp. L222 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molotsky, Irvin20 Years after Thievery, Rare Gold Ornaments Will Return to GreeceN.Y. Times 1996 C16Google Scholar
Shapiro, DanielLitigation and Art-Related DisputesResolution Methods for Art-Related Disputes17Byrne-Sutton, QuentinGeisinger-Mariéthoz, Fabienne 1999Google Scholar
Nafziger, James A.R.The Evolving Role of Admiralty Courts in Litigation of Historic Wreck 44 Harv. Int'l L.J251 2003Google Scholar
Siehr, KurtInternational Art Trade and the Law 243 Recueil Des Cours9 1993Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel V.Problems of Private International Law for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage 217 Recueil Des Cours215 1989Google Scholar
Siehr, KurtKulturgüter als res extra commercium im internationalen RechtsverkehrLebendiges Recht – Von Den Sumerern Bix Zur Gegenwart703 1995Google Scholar
Shyllon, FolarinThe Recovery of Cultural Objects by African States through the UNESCO and UNIDROIT Conventions and the Role of Arbitration 2002 Uniform L. Rev219Google Scholar
Clair, William St.Imperial Appropriations of the ParthenonImperialism, Art and RestitutionMerryman, John Henry 2006Google Scholar
Paterson, Robert K.The “Caring and Sharing” Alternative: Recent Progress in the International Law Association to Develop Draft Cultural Material Principles 12 Int'l J. Cultural Prop62 2005Google Scholar
Nafziger, James A.R.The Principles for Cooperation in the Mutual Protection and Transfer of Cultural Materials 8 Chi. J. Int'l L147 2007Google Scholar
Nafziger, James A.R.A Blueprint for Avoiding and Resolving Cultural Heritage Disputes 9 Art, Antiquity14 2004Google Scholar
Omland, AtleClaiming Gandhara: Legitimizing Ownership of Buddhist Manuscripts in the Sch⊘yen Collection, NorwayArt and Archaeology in Afghanistan: Its Fall and Survival229Krieken-Pieters, Juliette van 2006Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×