Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-npccv Total loading time: 0.348 Render date: 2022-10-03T20:22:35.703Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

1 - Vigilance, denunciation, evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Pierre Rosanvallon
Affiliation:
Collège de France, Paris
Arthur Goldhammer
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Vigilance

To be watchful, alert, and on guard are essential attributes of citizenship – attributes present from the beginning, since the ancient ideal of citizenship would have been unimaginable if reduced to mere periodic participation in elections. Vigilance first of all means monitoring: permanent close scrutiny of the actions of government. “A free people,” wrote Anacharsis Cloots during the French Revolution, “is an argus. It sees everything, hears everything, is everywhere, and never sleeps.” Vigilance compensates for the arrhythmia of the ballot box. The people are always at the ready, and the “dormant people” imagined by Locke and Rousseau become a giant ready to pounce. Vigilance in this sense means presence, attentiveness. The political language of the 1960s and 70s favored the term “mobilization”: a militant group was “mobilized” if it was prepared to play its role effectively. Mobilization was not so much a precondition of action as a way of describing a type of presence in the world, a kind of attentiveness to public affairs. Such a disposition is not merely a property of the agent who exhibits it: it enters into the construction of a global property of the public sphere.

Vigilance should also be seen as a mode of action. Though it “produces” nothing by itself, it cannot be dismissed as mere passivity. It defines a particular form of political intervention that involves neither decision-making nor exercise of the will. It rather creates possibilities and sets limits by imposing structure on a general field of action.

Type
Chapter
Information
Counter-Democracy
Politics in an Age of Distrust
, pp. 33 - 56
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cloots, Anacharsis, Écrits révolutionnaires (1790–1794) (Paris: Champ Libre, 1979), p. 110.Google Scholar
Jullien, François, Traité de l'efficacité (Paris: Grasset, 1997)Google Scholar
Conférence sur l'efficacité (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2005)
Foucault, Michel, Naissance de la biopolitique (Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2004)Google Scholar
Sécurité, territoire, population (Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2004)
McCubbins, Matthew D. and Schwartz, Thomas, “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudeau, Abbé, Première introduction à la philosophie économique ou analyse des États policés (1771), in Physiocrates (Paris: Édition Daire, 1846), vol. II, p. 683.Google Scholar
Trosne, Guillaume-François, De l'ordre social (Paris, 1777), p. 88.Google Scholar
Guizot, in Des moyens de gouvernement et d'opposition dans l'état actuel de la France (Paris, 1821).Google Scholar
“The Good Inspector,” in Bardach, Eugene and Kagan, Robert A., Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice and Public Policy (The University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger W. and Elder, Charles D., “The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory,” The Journal of Politics 33, no. 4 (Nov. 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, Maxwell and Shaw, Donald, “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass-Media,” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstlé, Jacques, “Démocratie représentative, réactivité politique et imputabilité,” Revue française de science politique 53, no. 6 (Dec. 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending,” American Journal of Political Science 39, no. 4 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubouis, Louis and Gueydan, Claude, Les Grands Textes du droit de l'Union européenne (Paris: Dalloz, 2002), vol. I, pp. 440–442.Google Scholar
Guilhaumou, Jacques, “Fragments of a Discourse of Denunciation (1789–1794),” in Baker, Keith Michael, ed., The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture, vol. IV: The Terror (Oxford: Pergamon, 1994)Google Scholar
Aymé, Marcel, Silhouette du scandale [1938] (Paris: Grasset, 1973), p. 34.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Arthur and Weinberg, Lila, The Muckrakers: The Era in Journalism that Moved America to Reform: The Most Significant Magazine Articles of 1902–1912 (New York: Simon & Shuster, 1961)Google Scholar
Chalmers, David Mark, The Social and Political Ideas of the Muckrakers (New York: Simon & Shuster, 1964).Google Scholar
Schultz, Stanley K., “The Morality of Politics: The Muckraker's Vision of Democracy,” The Journal of American History 52, no. 3 (Dec. 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandeis, Louis D., “the people's lawyer,” writing in Harper's Weekly, observed that “if sunlight is the best disinfectant, the light of publicity is the most effective of policemen.” See Other People's Money and How the Bankers Use It (1913), new edn (New York: F. A. Stokes, 1932), p. 32Google Scholar
Thompson, John B., Political Scandal, Power and Visibility in the Media Age (London: Polity Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Muhlmann, Géraldine, Une histoire politique du journalisme, XIXe–XXe siècle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2004)Google Scholar
Du journalisme en démocratie (Paris: Payot, 2004)
Markovits, Andrei S. and Silverstein, Mark, The Politics of Scandal: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1988)Google Scholar
Blic, Damien and Cyril, Lemieux, “Le scandale comme épreuve. Eléments de sociologie pragmatique,” Politix 71 (2005).Google Scholar
Dampierre, Eric, “Thèmes pour l'étude du scandale,” Annales ESC (July–Sept. 1954).Google Scholar
Max, Gluckman, “Gossip and Scandal,” Current Anthropology 4, no. 3 (June 1963)Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Juger: Sur la philosophie politique de Kant (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1991).Google Scholar
Bouvier, Jean, Les Deux Scandales de Panama (Paris: Julliard, 1964), p. 204.Google Scholar
Garment, Suzanne, Scandal: The Crisis of Mistrust in American Politics (New York: Times Books, 1991)Google Scholar
Rayner, Hervé, Les Scandales politiques: L'Opération “Mains propres” en Italie (Paris: Michel Houdiard, 2005)Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent: “Renunciation of secrecy is … the price to be paid for access to exalted status. If one wants to be known, one must be willing to reveal all and hide nothing from the public,” in De la justification: Les Économies de la grandeur (Paris: Gallimard, 1991), p. 226Google Scholar
Bart, and Lefebvre, Rémi, eds., La Proximité en politique: Usages, rhétoriques, pratiques (Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2003).Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard, La Fable des abeilles (1714), remark C. (Paris: Vrin, 1974), p. 58.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law (Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, “Shame and Modernity,” The British Journal of Criminology 33, no. 1 (Winter 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack, International Human Rights, 2nd edn (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Junius, , The Letters of Junius (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, Reputation and International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 6–9Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Pettit, Philip, The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kreps, David M. and Wilson, Robert, “Reputation and Imperfect Information,” Journal of Economic Theory 27, no. 2 (Aug. 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, “La dénonciation,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 51 (1984), p. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, Le Règne de la critique [1954] [Paris: Minuit, 1979], pp. 94–95).Google Scholar
Will, Pierre-Etienne, “Le contrôle constitutionnel de l'excès de pouvoir sous la dynastie des Ming,” in Delmas-Marty, Mireille and Will, Pierre Étienne, eds., La Chine et la démocratie (Paris: Fayard, 2007)Google Scholar
Yat-Sen, Sun, “La Constitution des cinq pouvoirs,” appendix to Souvenirs d'un révolutionnaire chinois (1925) (Paris, 1933)Google Scholar
Chao-Yuen, Tcheng, L'Évolution de la vie constitutionnelle de la Chine sous l'influence de Sun Yat-Sen et de sa doctrine (1885–1937) (Paris, 1937).Google Scholar
Haskins, Charles Homer, Norman Institutions (New York: F. Ungar, 1960).Google Scholar
Contamine, Philippe and Mattéoni, Olivier, eds., La France des principautés: Les Chambres des comptes, XIVe et XVe siècles (Paris: Comité pour l'histoire économique et financière de la France, 1996).Google Scholar
Lascoumes, P. and Galès, Patrick, eds., Gouverner par les instruments (Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, 2004).Google Scholar
Viveret, Patrick, L'Évaluation des politiques et des actions publiques: Rapport au premier ministre (Paris: La Documentation française, 1989)Google Scholar
Perret, Bernard, L'Evaluation des politiques publiques (Paris: La Découverte, 2001)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×