Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-t6r6x Total loading time: 0.398 Render date: 2022-07-06T04:57:07.556Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

11 - The sense of powerlessness and symbols of depoliticization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Pierre Rosanvallon
Affiliation:
Collège de France, Paris
Arthur Goldhammer
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The age of the unpolitical

The recent tendency toward political disintegration has two causes. The gap that counter-powers tend to open up between civic-civil society and the political sphere is one. For functional reasons, counter-powers tend to distance themselves from official institutions: the proof of their efficacy lies in their ability to weaken the powers-that-be. The citizen-as-watchdog gains what the citizen-as-voter loses; the negative sovereign asserts himself at the expense of the sovereign tout court; the organization of distrust undermines the assumption of trust conferred by election. For structural reasons, therefore, the political sphere tends to become alienated from society, to situate itself externally. Thus when citizens claim counter-powers, legal powers are devalued and minimized. As a logical consequence of the discontinuity that is established between society and the institutions of government, the statesman is automatically degraded to the rank of “politician.” To put it more bluntly still, democracy restricts democracy: elected officials are reined in and lose their room to maneuver owing to pressure from the voters themselves. As a result, the dynamics of control take precedence over the appropriation of power. The citizen is transformed into an ever more demanding political consumer, tacitly renouncing joint responsibility for creating a shared world. It is misleading, however, to interpret this development as nothing more than a sign of retreat into private life or growing indifference to the welfare of others, points repeated incessantly by a literature critical of the ravages of democratic individualism and filled with allegations of public “impotence” in the face of the inexorably increasing power of the private sector.

Type
Chapter
Information
Counter-Democracy
Politics in an Age of Distrust
, pp. 253 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colliot-Thélène, Catherine, “L'Ignorance du peuple,” in Duprat, Gérard, ed., L'Ignorance du peuple (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998), pp. 36–39Google Scholar
Thuot, Jean-François, La Fin de la représentation et les formes contemporaines de la démocratie (Montréal: Éditions Nota Bene, 1998)Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent, “The Politics of Blame Avoidance,” Journal of Public Policy 6, no. 4 (Oct.–Dec. 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackuen, Michael B., Stimson, James A., and Erikson, Robert S., “Responsabilité des élus devant l'électorat et efficacité du système politique américain: Une analyse contre-factuelle,” Revue française de science politique 53, no. 6 (Dec. 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel, and Watanuki, Joji, The Crisis Of Democracy (New York: NYU Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Rocard, Michel, “Gouverner: métier impossible,” Les Carnets de psychanalyse, nos. 15–16 (2004)Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (New York: Penguin, 2004)Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity (New York: Sage, 1992)Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques was one of the first to use this term in Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Pech, Thierry and Padis, Marc-Olivier, Les Multinationales du cœur: Les ONG, la politique et le marché (Paris: La République des idées-Seuil, 2004)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×