Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-fmrbl Total loading time: 0.518 Render date: 2022-10-04T07:21:22.618Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Pierre Rosanvallon
Affiliation:
Collège de France, Paris
Arthur Goldhammer
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The democratic ideal now reigns unchallenged, but regimes claiming to be democratic come in for vigorous criticism almost everywhere. In this paradox resides the major political problem of our time. Indeed, the erosion of citizens' confidence in political leaders and institutions is among the phenomena that political scientists have studied most intently over the past twenty years. National and comparative research has yielded a clear diagnosis. The literature on voter abstention is also abundant. Significantly, even the newest democracies suffer from this affliction, as a glance at the formerly Communist countries of Eastern Europe and the erstwhile dictatorships of Asia and Latin America shows. How are we to understand this situation, which has been variously described as a “crisis,” a “malaise,” a “disaffection,” and a “breakdown”? Most explanations invoke a series of factors, including the rise of individualism, anxious retreat into the private sphere, decline of political will, and rule by elites increasingly cut off from the broader public. We hear frequently about the “decline of politics,” and blame is said to lie with rulers who cannot see or abdicate their responsibilities as well as with people who have become discouraged by or indifferent to the political. Something is missing, critics say; something has gone wrong. Today's democracies have somehow deviated from an original model, somehow betrayed their original promise. Such judgments are commonplace nowadays: a bleak or bitter appraisal of the present is linked to nostalgia for a largely idealized civic past.

Type
Chapter
Information
Counter-Democracy
Politics in an Age of Distrust
, pp. 1 - 28
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, Kenneth J., The Limits of Organization (New York: Norton, 1974), p. 26.Google Scholar
Simmel, George, Sociologie: Études sur les formes de la socialisation (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999), pp. 355–356.Google Scholar
Le Sacre du citoyen: Histoire du suffrage universel en France (Paris: Gallimard, 1992)
Le Peuple introuvable: Histoire de la représentation démocratique en France (Paris: Gallimard, 1998)
La Démocratie inachevée: Histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France (Paris: Gallimard, 2000)
Sismondi, Jean Charles Léonard Simonde, Études sur les constitutions des peuples libres (Brussels, 1836), p. 230Google Scholar
Warren's, Mark E. introduction to Democracy and Trust (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, De la force du gouvernement actuel de la France et de la nécessité de s'y rallier ([Paris], 1796), p. 66.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, Recueil d'articles, 1829–1830 (Paris: Champion, 1992), p. 53.Google Scholar
Jouvenel, Bertrand, “The Means of Contestation,” Government and Opposition 1, no. 2 (Jan. 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, La Société du risque: Sur la voie d'une autre modernité (Paris: Aubier, 2001).Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick, Agir dans un monde incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2001), p. 311.
Inglehart, Ronaldet al., Human Beliefs and Values: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook Based on the 1999–2002 Values Surveys (Mexico: Siglo XXI, 2004)Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro, “Corruption and Democracy: A Cultural Assessment,” in Inglehart, R., ed., Human Values and Social Change: Findings from the Values Surveys (Leyden and Boston: Brill, 2003).Google Scholar
Mangematin, Vincent and Thuderoz, Christian, Des mondes de confiance: Un concept à l'épreuve de la réalité sociale (Paris: CNRS, 2003)Google Scholar
Harrison, Denis, La Confiance: Approches économiques et sociologiques (Montreal: Gaëtan Morin, 1999)Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei, ed., Political Mistrust and the Discrediting of Politicians (Leyden and Boston: Brill, 2005).Google Scholar
Capdevielle, Jacques, Démocratie: La Panne (Paris: Textuel, 2005)Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N.et al., Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945 (Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrineau, Pascale, ed., L'Engagement politique: Déclin ou mutation? (Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, 1994)Google Scholar
Arnaud, Lionel and Guionnet, Christine, eds., Les Frontières du politique: Enquête sur les processus de politisation et de dépolitisation (Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweisguth, Étienne, “La dépolitisation en question,” in Grunberg, Gérard, Mayer, Nonna, and Sniderman, Paul M., La Démocratie à l'épreuve (Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, 2002), pp. 56–57.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha, The Politics of the Governed (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Benasayag, Miguel and Sztulwark, Diego, Du contre-pouvoir: De la subjectivité contestataire à la construction de contre-pouvoirs, 2nd edn (Paris: La Découverte, 2002)Google Scholar
Holloway, John, Change the World Without Taking Power (London: Pluto Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Esposito, Robert, Catégories de l'impolitique (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2005)Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne, “Qu'est-ce que la philosophie politique? Notes pour un topique,” Actuel Marx 28 (2nd Semester 2000)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×