Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-bmzkg Total loading time: 0.398 Render date: 2022-07-05T09:37:23.752Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

5 - From the right of resistance to complex sovereignty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Pierre Rosanvallon
Affiliation:
Collège de France, Paris
Arthur Goldhammer
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Medieval theories of resistance and consent

The idea that there can be no legitimate power without the consent of the governed preceded the emergence of the democratic ideal, that is, the ideal of a self-instituted, self-regulated social order. It was in the Middle Ages, at the beginning of the thirteenth century, that the idea of popular consent was encapsulated in a celebrated maxim: “That which is the concern of all must be approved by all.” All the great authors of that time, theologians as well as philosophers, paid homage to it. One should be careful, however, not to interpret this maxim in modern democratic terms. At the time, its constitutional implications were limited. No specific procedures of consent were called for, and there was certainly no intention to put decisions to a vote. Its significance was above all moral: the Prince was exhorted to govern in the common interest. The point was simply to affirm that society is the source as well as the object of political authority. If there was any hint of popular sovereignty at all, it was therefore purely passive. The principle was solemnly affirmed, but without regard to its application. For medieval commentators, the most important thing was the nature of the good; achieving it depended on the virtues of the Prince. The theoretical imperative was to distinguish between good and bad governors, to distinguish between the Prince devoted to his people and the tyrant who governed for himself alone without regard to his subjects' needs or desires.

Type
Chapter
Information
Counter-Democracy
Politics in an Age of Distrust
, pp. 125 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gouron, André, “Aux origines médiévales de la formule Quod omnes tangit,” in Histoire du droit social. Mélanges en hommage à Jean Imbert (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989)Google Scholar
Post, Gaines, “A Roman Legal Theory of Consent, Quod omnes tangit, in Medieval Representation,” Wisconsin Law Review, 1950Google Scholar
Giesey, Ralph, “Quod Omnes Tangit: a Post-Scriptum,” Studia Gratiana 15, (1972)Google Scholar
Monahan, Arthur P., Consent, Coercion, and Limit: The Medieval Origins of Parliamentary Democracy (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Turchetti, Mario, Tyrannie et tyrannicide de l'Antiquité à nos jours (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2001)Google Scholar
Jouanna, Arlette, Le Devoir de révolte: La Noblesse française et la gestation de l'État moderne, 1559–1661 (Paris: Fayard, 1989)Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Knox, John, On Rebellion, ed. Mason, Roger A. (Cambridge University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Le Sacre du citoyen: Histoire du suffrage universel en France (Paris: Gallimard, 1992), pp. 21–38.
Rosso, Maxime, La Renaissance des institutions de Sparte dans la pensée française (XVIe–XVIIIe siècle) (Aix: Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille, 2005), pp. 84–101.Google Scholar
Catalano, Pierangelo, Tribunato e resistenza (Paravia: Turin, 1971).Google Scholar
Cousin, Jean, “J.-J. Rousseau interprète des institutions romaines dans le Contrat social,” in Études sur le Contrat social de Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1964)Google Scholar
Spector, Céline, “Droit de représentation et pouvoir négatif: la garde de la liberté dans la constitution genevoise,” in Bernardi, Bruno, Guénard, Florent, and Silvestrini, Gabriella, La Religion, la liberté, la justice: Un commentaire des “Lettres écrites de la montagne” de Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Paris: Vrin, 2005)Google Scholar
Bidegaray, Christian and Emeri, Claude, “Du pouvoir d'empêcher: veto ou contre-pouvoir,” Revue du droit public, no 2 (1994).Google Scholar
La Démocratie inachevée: Histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France (Paris: Gallimard, 2000), pp. 66–81.
Jaume, Lucien, “Condorcet: droit de résistance ou censure du peuple?” in Gros, Dominique and Camy, Olivier, eds., Le Droit de résistance à l'oppression (Paris: Le Genre Humain-Seuil, 2005).Google Scholar
Le Nombre et la Raison (Paris: Éditions de l'EHESS, 1993), p. iv.
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Foundations of Natural Right according to the principles of the Wissenschaftslehre, trans. Baur, Michael (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Renaut, Alain, Le Système du droit: Philosophie et droit dans la pensée de Fichte (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, J. G., Lettres et témoignages sur la Révolution française (Paris: Vrin, 2002), pp. 191–192.Google Scholar
Spitz, Jean-Fabien in his article “Droit de résistance,” in Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds., Dictionnaire de philosophie politique (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1996)Google Scholar
Löwenstein, Karl, “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights,” American Political Science Review 31, no. 3 (June 1937).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×