Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-4nk8m Total loading time: 0.307 Render date: 2021-10-24T07:22:40.708Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

4 - Same-sex Unions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2009

Michael J. Perry
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

As we saw in the preceding chapter, one can sensibly conclude that a law (or other policy) violates a constitutionally entrenched human right without also concluding that the Supreme Court should so rule. However, one cannot sensibly conclude that the Supreme Court should rule that a law violates a constitutionally entrenched human right without also concluding that the law violates the right; indeed, from a Thayerian perspective, the Supreme Court should rule that a law violates a constitutionally entrenched human right only if the Court concludes that the claim that the law does not violate the right is unreasonable. In this chapter, I argue that even a Supreme Court committed to Thayerian deference should rule that state refusals to extend the benefit of law to same-sex unions are unconstitutional – because the claim that such refusals are not unconstitutional is not merely mistaken but unreasonable.

Of course, it would be unrealistic (to put it mildly) to expect that any time soon the Supreme Court will rule that state refusals to extend the benefit of law to same-sex unions are unconstitutional. But that doesn't mean that such refusals aren't unconstitutional. In 1896, when Plessy v. Ferguson was decided, it would have been unrealistic to expect the Supreme Court to rule that de jure racial segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Nonetheless, Justice Harlan was right, in his passionate and prophetic dissent in Plessy, that such segregation did violate the Fourteenth Amendment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Same-sex Unions
  • Michael J. Perry, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court
  • Online publication: 05 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575532.005
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Same-sex Unions
  • Michael J. Perry, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court
  • Online publication: 05 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575532.005
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Same-sex Unions
  • Michael J. Perry, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court
  • Online publication: 05 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575532.005
Available formats
×