Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-pkshj Total loading time: 0.46 Render date: 2021-11-27T14:37:21.448Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

8 - Upper houses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Brian Galligan
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Scott Brenton
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems
Controversies, Changes and Challenges
, pp. 157 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzenstat, Janet 2007. The Canadian Founding: John Locke and Parliament. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Ajzenstat, Janet, Romney, Paul, Gentles, Ian and Gairdner, William D. (eds.) 2003. Canada’s Founding Debates. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Aroney, Nicholas, Prasser, Scott and Nethercote, J. R. (eds.) 2008. Restraining Elective Dictatorship: The Upper House Solution? Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Stanley 2003. Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice. Canberra: Department of the Senate.Google Scholar
Beck, J. Murray 1957. The Government of Nova Scotia. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, Gerard 2008. ‘Abolition and Restoration of a Legislative Council: Queensland and Other States’, in Aroney, Nicholas, Prasser, Scott and Nethercote, J. R. (eds.), Restraining Elective Dictatorship: The Upper House Solution? Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Clune, David and Griffith, Gareth 2006. Decision and Deliberation: The Parliament of New South Wales 1856–2006. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, R. MacGregor 1970. The Government of Canada, 5th edn., revised by Ward, Norman. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Docherty, David C. 2008. ‘Upper Houses in the Canadian Provinces’, in Aroney, Nicholas, Prasser, Scott and Nethercote, J. R. (eds.), Restraining Elective Dictatorship: The Upper House Solution? Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael 1989. The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, ‘Abeyances’ and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franks, C. E. S. 2003. ‘The Canadian Senate in Modern Times’, in Joyal, Serge (ed.), Protecting Canadian Democracy: The Senate You Never Knew. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Arihiro 1997. Sovereignty and the Sword: Harrington, Hobbes and Mixed Government in the English Civil Wars. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garon, André 1970. ‘La fonction politique et sociale des chambres haute canadiennes, 1791–1841’, Histoire Sociale (Social History), 5 (April): 6687.Google Scholar
Grebstad, David 2014. ‘A Tale of Two Houses: The Rise and Demise of the Legislative Council of Manitoba, 1871–1876’, Manitoba History, 75: 212.Google Scholar
Harding, Justin 2000. ‘Ideology or Expediency? The Abolition of the Queensland Legislative Council 1915–22’, Labor History, 79: 162–78.Google Scholar
Heard, Andrew 2014. Canadian Constitutional Conventions: The Marriage of Law and Politics. Ontario: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, W. K. 1972. The New Zealand Legislative Council: A Study of the Establishment, Failure and Abolition of an Upper House. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Joyal, Serge (ed.) 2003. Protecting Canadian Democracy: The Senate You Never Knew. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Frank 1951. The Government of Prince Edward Island. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Christopher 1998. 1867 How the Fathers Made a Deal. McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard 1996. ‘The Australian Senate as a “House of Review”’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 31 (2): 191204.Google Scholar
Odgers, J. R. 1976. Australian Senate Practice, 5th edn. Canberra: Australian Government Printer.Google Scholar
Orban, Edmund 1969. ‘La fin du bicaméralisme au Québec’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 2 (3): 312–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, G.S. and Forrest, Martyn 1989. Australia’s Commonwealth Parliament 1901–1988: Ten Perspectives. Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Meg 2010. ‘A Stronger Second Chamber? Assessing the Impact of House of Lords Reform in 1999 and the Lessons for Bicameralism’, Political Studies, 58 (5): 866–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Meg 2012. ‘Elected Second Chambers and Their Powers: An International Survey’, Political Quarterly, 83 (1): 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, Campbell 1990. ‘Parliamentary Federations and Limited Government: Constitutional Design and Redesign in Australia and Canada’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2 (2): 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, Campbell 1999. ‘The Representation of Small Parties and Independents in the Senate’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 34 (3): 353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, Campbell 2008. ‘Political Legitimacy for an Appointed Senate’, Choices, 14 (11): 127 (Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy). Available at: www.irpp.org/assets/research/strengthening-canadian-democracy/political-legitimacy-for-an-appointed-senate/vol14no11.pdf.Google Scholar
Sharman, Campbell 2013. ‘Limiting Party Representation: Evidence from a Small Parliamentary Chamber’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38 (3): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David E. 2003. The Canadian Senate in Bicameral Perspective. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Bruce 2002. ‘Bicameralism and Democracy: The Transformation of Australian State Upper Houses’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 37 (2): 267–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Bruce 2008. ‘State Legislative Councils – Designing for Accountability’, in Aroney, Nicholas, Prasser, Scott and Nethercote, J. R. (eds.), Restraining Elective Dictatorship: The Upper House Solution? Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Ken 1969. House of Review? The New South Wales Legislative Council, 1934–68. Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, John Manning 1976. Colonial Self-Government: The British Experience 1759–1856. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Raymond 1992. A People’s Counsel: A History of the Parliament of Victoria, 1856–1990. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Liz 1999. ‘Minor Parties and the Legislative Process in the Australian Senate: A Study of the 1993 Budget’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 34 (1): 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Upper houses
  • Edited by Brian Galligan, University of Melbourne, Scott Brenton, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316178560.009
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Upper houses
  • Edited by Brian Galligan, University of Melbourne, Scott Brenton, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316178560.009
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Upper houses
  • Edited by Brian Galligan, University of Melbourne, Scott Brenton, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316178560.009
Available formats
×