Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-z5d2w Total loading time: 0.521 Render date: 2021-11-30T15:18:20.452Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

1 - Constitutional conventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Brian Galligan
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Scott Brenton
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems
Controversies, Changes and Challenges
, pp. 8 - 23
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, N.W. 2009. ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’, Law Quarterly Review 125: 294309.Google Scholar
Bryce, James 1884. Constitutions. New York: Oxford University Press American Branch.Google Scholar
Dicey, A.V. [1885] 1973. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Evatt, H.V. 1936. The King and His Dominion Governors. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galligan, Denis and Versteeg, Mila (eds.) 2013. Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Tom 2013. ‘Constitutions as Contract, Constitutions as Charters’, in Galligan, Denis and Versteeg, Mila (eds.), Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, 182204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey 2010. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell 2013. ‘Why a Constitution?’, in Galligan, Denis and Versteeg, Mila (eds.), Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. [1961] 1972. The Concept of the Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heard, Andrew 2014. Canadian Constitutional Conventions: The Marriage of Law & Politics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran 2013. ‘The Strategic Foundations of Constitutions’, in Galligan, Denis and Versteeg, Mila (eds.), Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, 157–81.Google Scholar
Hume, David. [1772/1777] 1994. ‘Of the Original Contract’, Essay Twenty-Two, in Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), Political Essays. Cambridge University Press, 186201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1777] 1972. ‘Of Political Society’, Section IV, in Selby-Bigge, L.A. (ed.), Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 205–11.Google Scholar
Sir Jennings, Ivor 1959. The Law and the Constitution, 5th edn. University of London Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy’. Party Politics 1(1): 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koeble, Thomas A. 1995. ‘The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology’. Comparative Politics 27(2): 231–43.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, Ian and Miller, Raymond 2012. Democratic Decline and Democratic Renewal. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Geoffrey 1984. Constitutional Conventions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McHarg, Aileen 2008. ‘Reforming the United Kingdom Constitution: Law, Convention, Soft Law’, Modern Law Review 71: 853–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, Iain 2010. What’s Wrong with the British Constitution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
New Zealand Cabinet Office 2008. Cabinet Manual. Wellington, New Zealand: Cabinet Office, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.PubMed
Patriation Reference 1981. Reference re: Resolution to Amend the Constitution. 1 SCR 753.
Sirota, Leonid 2011.‘Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions’, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 11: 2951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheare, K.C. 1951. Modern Constitutions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×