Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-zkswk Total loading time: 2.449 Render date: 2022-11-29T09:10:23.242Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Select bibliography*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Frank Cranmer
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Mark Hill QC
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Celia Kenny
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
Russell Sandberg
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Confluence of Law and Religion
Interdisciplinary Reflections on the Work of Norman Doe
, pp. 275 - 290
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select bibliography*

Agamben, Giorgio. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahdar, Rex and Aroney, Nicholas eds. Sharia in the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Alesandro, John A. ‘The Revision of Church Law: Conflict and Reconciliation’ (1980) 40 The Jurist 1.Google Scholar
Al-Khalili, Jim and 55 others. ‘David Cameron Fosters Division by Calling Britain “a Christian Country”: Most Britons Are Not Christians’. Daily Telegraph 20 April 2014.
Anglican Communion Legal Advisers Network. Principles of Canon Law Common to the Churches of the Anglican Communion. London: Anglican Communion Office, 2008.
Bader, Veit. Secularism or Democracy? Associational Governance of Religious Diversity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, Cynthia D.L’Affaire des Foulards–Discrimination, or the Price of a Secular Public Education System’ (1996) 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 303.Google Scholar
Baker, John H. Collected Papers on English Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, John H. The Year Books of 12–14 Henry VIII. Selden Society Vol. 119, 2002.Google Scholar
Baker, John H. and Milsom, S.F.C. Sources of English Legal History: Private Law to 1750. London: Butterworths 1986; 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert and Houghton, John. ‘Circular Arguments: The Status and Legitimacy of Administrative Rules’ (1986) Public Law 239.
Ball, Milner S. The Word and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Banaker, Reza. Merging Law and Sociology: Beyond the Dichotomies in Socio-Legal Research. Berlin/Wisconsin: Galda and Wilch Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max. ‘Introduction.’ In Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max (eds), Law and Social Theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart, 2013. 1.Google Scholar
Bates, T. St John. ‘Parliament, Policy and Delegated Power’ (1986) Statute Law Review 114.
Bausch, Kenneth C. The Emerging Consensus in Social Systems Theory. Berlin: Springer, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. A God of One’s Own. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. ‘The Return of Political Theology: The Scarf Affair in Comparative Constitutional Perspective in France, Germany and Turkey’ (2010) 36 Philosophy and Social Criticism 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Antoine. La Sépulture en Droit Canonique du Décret de Gratien au Concile de Trente. Paris: Les Editions Domat-Montchrestien, 1933.Google Scholar
Berry, Duncan. ‘When Does an Instrument Made under Primary Legislation Have “Legislative Effect”?’ (1997) The Loophole 14.
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Bliss, Frederick M. Understanding Reception: A Backdrop to Its Ecumenical Use. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bolland, William C. A Manual of Year Book Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925.Google Scholar
Bolland, William C. Year Books Series. Vol. XIV. Part II. Year Books of 6 Edward II 1313, Selden Society Vol. 43, 1926.Google Scholar
Bouscaren, T.L. and Ellis, A.C.. Canon Law: A Text and Commentary, 3rd edn. Milwaukee: Bruce, 1957.Google Scholar
Bradney, Anthony and Cownie, Fiona. Living without Law: An Ethnography of Quaker Decision-Making, Dispute Avoidance and Dispute Resolution. Farnham: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
Brady, Kathleen. The Distinctiveness of Religion in American Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. ‘Heidegger’s Categories of Being and Time’ (1983) 66 The Monist 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert ed. Rorty and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Brauch, Jeffrey A.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence’ (1987) 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 111.Google Scholar
Brauch, Jeffrey A.The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law’ (2005) 11 Columbia Journal of European Law 113.Google Scholar
Browning, Don S. et al. (eds). Sex, Marriage, and Family in World Religions. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bujo, Benezet. Foundations of an African Ethic: Beyond the Universal Claims of Western Morality. Nairobi: Paulines, 2003.Google Scholar
Cam, Helen M. Year Books Series Vol. XXVI, Part II. The Eyre of London, 14 Edward II (1321) Vol. II, Selden Society Vol. 86, 1969.Google Scholar
Cameron, David. ‘My Faith in the Church of England’. Church Times, 16 April 2014.
Cameron, Gregory K.A Tortoise in a Hurry: The Ordering of Anglican Communion’ (2008) 8 International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord Campbell of Alloway. ‘Codes of Practice as an Alternative to Legislation’ (1985) Statute Law Review 127.
Carens, Joseph H. Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, Jose. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Casanova, Jose. ‘Public Religions Revisited’. In De Vries, Hent (ed.), Religion: Beyond the Concept. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Chiappetta, Luigi. Il Codice di Diritto Canonico, 3rd edn. EDB 2011. 3 vols II.Google Scholar
Ciprotti, Pio. ‘Qualche Punto Caratteristico della Riforma del Diritto Penale Canonico’ (1990) 46 Ephemerides Iuris Canonici 111.Google Scholar
Codling, Amy R.A Critical Pluralist Analysis of R (on the application of Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School’ (2012) 169 Law & Justice 224.Google Scholar
Codling, Amy R.What Do You Believe? Taxonomy of a Subjective Legal Pluralism’. In Sandberg, Russell (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. 199.Google Scholar
Colloquium of Anglican and Roman Catholic Canon Lawyers. ‘A Decade of Ecumenical Dialogue on Canon Law’ (2009) 11 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 284.CrossRef
Colton, Paul. ‘Religion in Public Education in Ireland’. In Robbers, Gerhard (ed.), Religion in Public Education. European Consortium for Church and State Research, 2011. 227.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Cordani, A. Santangelo. La Giurispudenza Della Rota Romana Nel Secolo XIV. Milan: Giuffrè, 2001.Google Scholar
Cornille, Catherine. ‘Double Religious Belonging: Aspects and Questions’ (2003)44 Buddhist-Christian Studies. 40.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. ‘The Representation of Law’s Autonomy in Autopoiesis Theory’. In Přibáň, Jiří and Nelken, David (eds), Law’s New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. Farnham: Ashgate, 2001. 80.Google Scholar
Coughlin, J.J. Canon Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Frank. ‘Regulation within the Religious Society of Friends’ (2003) 7 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, Frank. ‘Quakers and the Campaign for Same Sex Marriage’. In Sandberg, Russell (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. 67.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Frank and Peterson, Scot. ‘Employment, Sex Discrimination and the Churches: The Percy Case’ (2006) 8 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, Alan. ‘The Idea of Common Law as Custom’. In Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J.B. (eds), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Cuschieri, Andrew. The Sacrament of Reconciliation. A Theological and Canonical Treatise. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992.Google Scholar
Cutting, Gary ed. Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Danchin, Peter. ‘Of Prophets and Proselytes: Freedom of Religion and the Conflict of Rights in International Law’ (2008) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 249.Google Scholar
Danchin, Peter. ‘Suspect Symbols: Value Pluralism as a Theory of Religious Freedom in International Law’ (2008) 33 Yale Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Danchin, Peter. ‘Islam in the Secular Nomos of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2011) 32(4) Michigan Journal of Political Theology 451.Google Scholar
Davies, Margaret. ‘Pluralism and Law and Religion’. In Cane, Peter, Evans, Carolyn, and Robinson, Zoe (eds), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Davidson, Arnold I. ed. Foucault and His Interlocutors. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dávila, María Teresa. ‘Racialization and Racism in Theological Ethics: History as a Pillar for a Catholic Ethic Grounded on the Preferential Option for the Poor and an Incarnational Anthropology’. In Keenan, James (ed.), Catholic Theological Ethics, Past, Present, and Future: The Trento Conference. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Press, 2012.Google Scholar
De Bula Baines, Cynthia. ‘L’Affaire des Foulards – Discrimination, or the Price of a Secular Public Education System’ (1996) 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 303.Google Scholar
DeGirolami, Marc O. The Tragedy of Religious Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Pozzo, Massimo. ‘Il Rapporto tra Delitto e Peccato nell’Attualità del Diritto Canonico’ (2013) 53 Ius Canonicum 199.Google Scholar
Dolezalek, Gero. ‘Quaestiones motae in Rota: Richterliche Beratungsnotizen aus dem vierzehnten Jahrhundert’. In Kuttner, Stephan and Pennington, Kenneth (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law. Vatican City, 1980. 99.Google Scholar
Douglas, Gillian et al. Social Cohesion and Civil Law: Marriage, Divorce and Religious Courts. Cardiff: Cardiff University, 2011. http://www.law.cf.ac.uk/clr/research/cohesion.html.
Douglas, Gillian et al. ‘Religious Divorce in England and Wales: Religious Tribunals in Action’. In Shah, Prakash et al. (eds), Family, Religion, and Law: Cultural Encounters in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014. 195.Google Scholar
DuBoff, Leonard D, Burr, Sherri, and Murray, Michael D.. Art Law: Cases and Materials. New York: Aspen, 2010.Google Scholar
Durham, W. Cole Jr. and Scharffs, Brett G. Law and Religion: International, National, and Comparative Perspectives. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2010.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1986.Google Scholar
Eddy, Mary Baker. The Manual of the Mother Church – The First Church of Christ Scientist in Boston, Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Christian Science Board of Directors, 1895.Google Scholar
Erdö, Péter. Il Peccato e il Delitto. La Relazione tra Due Concetti Fondamentali alla Luce del Diritto Canonico. Giuffrè Editore, 2014. 9.Google Scholar
Espín, Orlando. ‘Intercultural Thought’. In Espín, Orlando and Nickoloff, James B. (eds), An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies. Glazier: Collegeville, 2007.Google Scholar
Evans, Carolyn. ‘The Islamic Scarf in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law 52.Google Scholar
Eubel, Conradus. Hierarchia Catholica medii aevi. Regensburg: Sumptibus et typis Librariae Monasterii Regensbergianae, 1898.Google Scholar
Fabris, Adriano. TeorEtica. Filosofia della relazione. Brescia: Morcelliana, 2009.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Silvio and Cristofori, Rinaldo eds. Library of Essays on Law and Religion, 4 vols. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
Fifoot, Cecil Stuart, Herbert. History and Sources of the Common Law. London: Stevens & Sons, 1949.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. The Collected Essays of John Finnis, 5 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Firey, Abigail ed. A New History of Penance. Leiden: Brill, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flahiff, George B.The Use of Prohibitions by Clerics against Ecclesiastical Courts in England’ (1941) 3 Mediaeval Studies 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliniaux, André. ‘Les Anciennes Collections de “Decisiones Rotae Romanae” (1925) 4 Revue historique de droit français et étranger 61.Google Scholar
Foblets, Marie-Claire and Katayoun, Alidadi. ‘The RELIGARE Report’. In Foblets, Marie-Claire, Alidadi, Katayoun, Nielsen, Joergen, and Yanasmayan, Zeynep (eds), Belief, Law and Politics: What Future for a Secular Europe? Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Ford, David and Clemson, Frances eds. Interreligious Reading after Vatican II: Scriptural Reasoning, Comparative Theology and Receptive Ecumenism. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1972.Google Scholar
Fournier, Paul. ‘Jesselin de Cassagnes, Canoniste’ (1921) 35 Histoire littéraire de la France 348.Google Scholar
French, Rebecca et al. eds. Buddhism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Fry, T. ed. The Rule of St Benedict. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Gabel, Leona C. Benefit of Clergy in England in the Later Middle Ages. Northampton, MA: Smith College Studies in History, 1928–1929. 14.Google Scholar
Ganz, Gabriele. Quasi-Legislation: Recent Developments in Secondary Legislation. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Gee, Henry and Hardy, William J. Documents Illustrative of English Church History. London: Macmillan, 1896.Google Scholar
Geffré, Claude. ‘Double Belonging and the Originality of Christianity as a Religion’. In Cornille, Catherine (ed.), Many Mansions?: Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity. New York: Orbis Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Sarah Barringer. The Spirit of the Law: Religious Voices and the Constitution in Modern America. Cambridge, MA: Belknap University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Green, T.J.Penal Law in the Code of Canon Law and in the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches: Some Comparative Reflections’ (1994) 28 Studia Canonica 407.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. Private Consciences and Public Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. Religion and Fairness, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006–2008.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. Legal Interpretation: Perspectives from Other Disciplines and Private Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, XVI. ‘Mirari Vos’. In Carlen, Claudia (ed.), The Papal Encyclicals 1740–1878. Raleigh, NC: McGrath, 1981.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Alois. ‘Konzil und Rezeption’ (1970) 45 Theologie und Philosophie 321.Google Scholar
Guy, John Alexander. Christopher St German on Chancery and Statute. Selden Society Supplementary Series, 1985.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip. Law and Judicial Duty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanegraaff, Wouter J.Defining Religion in Spite of History’. In Platvoet, Jan G. and Molendijk, Arie L. (eds), The Pragmatics of Defining Religion. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine ed. Judaism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
Heelas, Paul and Woodhead, Linda. The Spiritual Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.Google Scholar
Helmholz, Richard H. Canon Law and the Law of England. London: Hambledon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Helmholz, Richard H. Natural Law in Court: A History of Legal Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hemnant, Mary. Select Cases in the Exchequer Chamber 51 Selden Society, Selden Society Vol. 51, 1933.
Hemnant, Mary. Select Cases in the Exchequer Chamber. Before All the Justices of England. Vol. II 1461–1509 64. Selden Society, Vol. 64, 1945.
Hill, Mark ed. Faithful Discipleship: Clergy Discipline in Anglican and Roman Catholic Canon Law. Rome: Pontifical University of St Thomas Aquinas, 2001.Google Scholar
Hill, Mark. Ecclesiastical Law, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hill, Mark. ‘Religious Symbolism and Conscientious Objection in the Workplace’ (2013) 15 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Mark, Sandberg, Russell and Doe, Norman. Religion and Law in the United Kingdom, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, 2014.Google Scholar
Hogan, Gerard and Morgan, David Gwynn. Administrative Law in Ireland, 4th edn. Dublin: Round Hall Thomson Reuters, 2010.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell. In Collected Legal Papers. New York: Brace and Howe, 1920.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Paul. The Agnostic Age: Law, Religion, and the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Hostiensis (Henry of Susa, c. 1200–71). Lectura in libros Decretalium. Venice: Iuntas 1581, reprinted Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1965.
Hostensis. Summa Aurea. Venice, 1574.
Hostensis. Lectura in Libros Decretalium. Venice, 1581.
House of Commons Public Administration Committee. Work of the Charity Commission in 2008–09: Oral Evidence given by Dame Suzi Leather, Chair, and Andrew Hind, Chief Executive, Charity Commission (HC 109-I of Session 2009–10). London: TSO, 2010.
Hughes, Phillip. The Reformation of England, 5th edn. London: Burns & Oates, 1963.Google Scholar
Innocent, IV. Commentaria in libros Decretalium. Venice, 1570.Google Scholar
Inter-Anglican Standing Committee on Unity, Faith and Order. The Anglican Communion Covenant: A Study Guide. London: Anglican Communion Office, 2011.
Jeremy, Anthony W.Pacta Sunt Servanda: The Influence of Canon Law upon the Development of Contractual Obligations’ (2000) 144 Law & Justice 4.Google Scholar
Paul, John II.Reconciliatio et Paenitentia’ (1985) 77 Acta Apostolicae Sedis 185.Google Scholar
Paul, John II. Catechism of the Catholic Church, rev edn. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1999. 1466.Google Scholar
Joint Committee of the Convocation of Canterbury. The Position of the Laity in Church. London: SPCK, 1902.
Joppke, Christian. ‘Double Standards? Veils and Crucifixes in the European Legal Order’ (2013) 54 European Journal of Sociology 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalanges, Kristine. Religious Liberty in Western and Islamic Law: Toward a World Legal Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Celia G. ‘“Not to Compel but to Conjure”: The Bible and Pluralism’ (2013) Search: A Church of Ireland Journal 187.
Kenny, Celia G.Public Space, Private Face; Veiling as a Challenge for Legal Reasoning’. In Sandberg, Russell (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015. 213.Google Scholar
King, Michael. ‘The Muslim Identity in a Secular World’. In King, Michael (ed.), God’s Law versus State Law. Ithaca, NY: Great Seal, 1995. 91.Google Scholar
King, Michael. ‘The Radical Sociology of Niklas Luhmann’. In Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max (eds), Law and Social Theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart, 2013. 59.Google Scholar
King, Michael and Thornhill, Chris. Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinhans, Martha-Marie and Macdonald, Roderick A.What Is a Critical Legal Pluralism?’ (1997) 12(2) Canadian Journal of International Law and Society 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knafla, Louis A.Conscience in the English Common Law Tradition’ (1976) 26 University of Toronto Law Journal 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, Samantha. Freedom of Religion, Minorities and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Knitter, Paul F. Without Buddha I Could Not Be a Christian. Oxford: One World, 2009.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. Defending American Religious Neutrality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, Arcot. Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practices. New York: UN, 1960.Google Scholar
Laermans, Rudi and Verschraegen, Gert. ‘“The Late Niklas Luhmann” on Religion’ (2001) 48(1) Social Compass 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambeth Commission on Communion. The Windsor Report. London: Anglican Communion Office, 2004.PubMed
Landau, P. Ius Patronatus. Cologne, 1975.Google Scholar
Law Commission, Offences against Religion and Public Worship, PWP No 79, HMSO. 1981.
Law Commission, Offences against Religion and Public Worship, Law Com No 145, HMSO. 1984.
Lawrence, David. The Care of Stained Glass. Dublin: The Heritage Council, Nd.
Laws, John G. McK. The Common Law Constitution: The Hamlyn Lectures 2013. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. Religious Liberty, 4 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Lee, Natalie. ‘Case Comment: Child Benefit – Share Care of Two Children’ (2006) 13(2) Journal of Social Security Law 119.Google Scholar
Lerner, Natan. Religion, Secular Beliefs and Human Rights: 25 Years after the Human Rights Declaration. Leiden, MD: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Sueur, Andrew. ‘Taking the Soft Option? The Duty to Give Reasons in the Draft Freedom of Information Bill’ (1999) Public Law 419.
Letsas, George. ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Tom. ‘What Not to Wear: Religious Rights, the European Court, and the Margin of Appreciation’ (2007) 56 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, Tore, Durham, W. Cole Jr., and Tahzib-Lie, Bahia G. Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Brill, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubin, Timothy, Davis, Donald R, and Krishnan, Jayanth K. eds. Hinduism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. A Sociological Theory of Law, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1983/2014.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993/2004.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. Introduction to Systems Theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2002/2013.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Feminism Unmodified: Discourse on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Macnair, Mike. ‘Equity and Conscience’ (2007) 27 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, Frederic. W. ed. Year Books of Edward II. Volume 1.1 and 2 Edward II. 1307–1309. Selden Society Vol. 17, 1903.
Maitland, Frederic. W. The Forms of Action at Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965/1909.Google Scholar
Malik, Maleiha. Minority Legal Orders in the UK. London: The British Academy, 2012.Google Scholar
Mancini, Susanna. ‘The Power of Symbols and Symbols as Power: Secularism and Religion as Guarantors of Cultural Convergence’ (2008) 30 Cardozo Law Review 2629.Google Scholar
Mancini, Susanna and Rosenfeld, Michael. ‘Introduction’. In Mancini, Susanna and Rosenfeld, Michael (eds), Constitutional Secularism in an Age of Religious Revival. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, Ian et al. eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to the Anglican Communion. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Jill. ‘Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey’ (2006) 69 Modern Law Review 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Michael W., Cochran, Robert F, and Carmella, Angela eds. Christian Perspectives on Legal Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W., Garvey, John H, and Berg, Thomas C. Religion and the Constitution, 2nd edn. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2006.Google Scholar
McEwan, Ian. The Children Act. London: Jonathan Cape, 2014.Google ScholarPubMed
McGavin, Anne C. ‘The Distribution of Legislative Power within the Scottish Episcopal Church’. Unpublished LLM dissertation. University of Wales: Cardiff, 1997.
McGrade, Arthur S. and Hooker, Richard. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity: A Critical Edition with Modern Spelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
McGuckin, John A. The Ascent of Christian Law: Patristic and Byzantine Reformulations. New York: SVS Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Megarry, Robert E.Administrative Quasi-Legislation’ (1944) 60 Law Quarterly Review 125.Google Scholar
Milsom, S.F.C. Historical Foundations of the Common Law, 2nd edn. London: Butterworths, 1981.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl. Truth, Politics, Morality. London: Routledge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molineaux, N.B. Medici et Medicamenta: The Medicine of Penance in Late Antiquity. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2009.Google Scholar
Mollat, Guillaume. La Collation des Bénéfices Ecclésiastiques Sous les Papes d’Avignon. Paris: Boccard, 1920.Google Scholar
Moore, E. Garth and Briden, Timothy. Moore’s Introduction to English Canon Law, 2nd edn. London: Mowbray, 1985.Google Scholar
Mynors, Roger A.B. and Thomson, Rodney M. Catalogue of the Manuscripts of Hereford Cathedral Library. Woodbridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. Être Singulier Pluriel. Paris: Galilée, 1996.Google Scholar
National Centre for Social Research. British Social Attitudes No 28 [31], London, 2011.
Nazir-Ali, Michael. ‘The Legal Threat to Our Spiritual Tradition’. Daily Telegraph, 30 April 2010.
Nedungatt, George ed. A Guide to the Eastern Code. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Orientale, 2002.Google Scholar
Neilson, Nellie. Year Books Series: Year Books of 10 Edward IV and 49 Henry VI 1470. Selden Society Vol. 4, 1930.
Nichols, Joel A. ed. Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David. ‘Using Systems Theory to Understand Legal Pluralism: What Could Be Gained?46(2) (2012) Law and Society Review 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Non-Subscribing Presbyterian of Church of Ireland. The Constitution and Code of Discipline. Belfast: Non-Subscribing Presbyterian of Church of Ireland Synod, 1997.
Noonan, John T. Jr.Development in Moral Doctrine’. In Keenan, James F. and Shannon, Thomas A. (eds), The Context of Casuistry. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Novak, David. ‘Natural Law and Judaism’. In Emon, Anver M., Levering, Matthew, and Novak, David (eds), Natural Law. A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Novak, Davie, Emen, Anver M, and Levering, Matthew. Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. The New Religious Intolerance: Overcoming the Politics of Fear. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kerry. Religion, Charity, and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ombres, Robert. ‘Why Then the Law?’ (1974) New Blackfriars 296.
Ombres, Robert. ‘Justice and Equity in the 1983 Code’ (1998) 96/97Law & Justice 23.Google Scholar
Orobator, Agbonkhiameghe. Theology Brewed in an African Pot. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2008.Google Scholar
Örsy, Ladislas. ‘Models of Approach to Canon Law and Their Impact on Interpretation’ (1990) The Jurist 50.
Örsy, Ladislas. Theology and Canon Law: New Horizons for Legislation and Interpretation. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Örsy, Ladislas. Receiving the Council: Theological and Canonical Insights and Debates. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavisic, David Albornoz. I Diritti Nativi della Chiesa. Rome: LAS, 2008.Google Scholar
Pelikan, Jaroslav. Interpreting the Bible and the Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. ‘The Canonists and Pluralism in the Thirteenth Century’ (1976) 51 Speculum 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John. The Pretenses of Loyalty: Locke, Liberal Theory, and the American Political Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. Under God? Religious Faith and Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Michael J. The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Paul, VI. Ordo Paenitentiae. Vatican City: Vatican Polyglot Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Percy, Helen. Scandalous, Immoral and Improper – The Trial of Helen Percy. Glendaruel: Argyll Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Perkins, John. A Profitable Booke of Master John Perkins, Fellowe of the Inner Temple. Treating of the Lawes of Englande. 1528.
Phan, Peter. ‘Multiple Religious Belonging: Opportunities and Challenges for Theology and Church’ (2003) 64 Theological Studies 496497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillimore, Robert. The Ecclesiastical Law of the Church of England, 2nd edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1895.Google Scholar
Plongeron, Bernard. ‘Anathema or Dialogue? Christian Reactions to the Declarations of the Rights of Man in the United States and Europe in the Eighteenth Century’. In Muller, Alois and Greinacher, Norbert (eds), The Church and the Rights of Man, Concilium 1979, 1, 39.
Plucknett, Theodore and Barton, John eds. Christopher St German: Doctor and Student, First Dialogue. Selden Society Vol. 91, 1974.Google Scholar
Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the Unity of Christians. Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism. London: Catholic Truth Society, 1993.
Poschmann, Bernhard. Penance and the Anointing of the Sick. New York: Herder & Herder, 1964.Google Scholar
Přibáň, Jiří. ‘[Review of] Niklas Luhmann: Law, Justice, Society by Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pui-Lan, Kwok. Postcolonial Imagination & Feminist Theology. London: SCM Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Puza, Richard and Doe, Norman eds. Religion and Law in Dialogue: Covenantal and Non-Covenantal Cooperation between State and Religion in Europe. Leuven: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar
Radin, Max. ‘The Conscience of the Court48 (1932) Law Quarterly Review 506.Google Scholar
Rawlings, Richard. ‘Concordats of the Constitution’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review 257.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples: The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Renucci, Jean-Francois. Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2005 (Human Rights Files, no. 20).Google Scholar
Robbins, Jeffrey W. ed. John D Caputo and Gianni Vattimo: After the Death of God. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Rodes, Robert E. Jr. Lay Authority and Reformation in the English Church: Edward I to the Civil War. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Lord Rodger of Earlsferry. The Courts, the Church and the Constitution: Aspects of the Disruption of 1843. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008.
Ronchi, Paolo. ‘Crucifixes, Margin of Appreciation and Consensus: The Grand Chamber Ruling in Lautsi v Italy’ (2011) 13 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusch, William G. Ecumenical Reception: Its Challenge and Opportunity. Grand Rapids/Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007.Google Scholar
Ruyssen, Georges ed. La Disciplina della Penitenza nelle Chiese Orientali. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Orientale, 2013.Google Scholar
Samuels, Alec. ‘Codes of Practice and Legislation’ (1986) 29 Statute Law Review 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Russell. ‘Church–State Relations in Europe: From Legal Models to an Interdisciplinary Approach’ (2008) 1 Journal of Religion in Europe 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Russell. Law and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Russell. ‘[Review of] Norman Doe, Law and Religion in Europe’ (2012) 75 Modern Law Review 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Russell. ‘Defining the Divine’ (2014) 16 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Russell. Religion, Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Russell ed. Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Russell et al. ‘Britain’s Religious Tribunals: “Joint Governance” in Practice’ (2013) 33 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santangelo, Cordani A. La giurisprudenza della Rota Romana nel secolo XIV. Milan: A. Giuffré, 2001.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. ‘Uniqueness: A Pluralistic Reading of John 14:6’. In O’ Grady, John and Scherle, Peter (eds), Ecumenics from the Rim: Explorations in Honour of John D’Arcy May. Berlin: LIT Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Seipp, David J. ‘The Reception of Canon Law and Civil Law in the Common Law Courts before 1660’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seipp, David J. ‘Trust and Fiduciary Duty in the Early Common Law’ (2011) 91 Boston University Law Review 1011.Google Scholar
Shah, Prakash et al. eds. Family, Religion, and Law: Cultural Encounters in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Simpson, A.W.B. History of the Common Law of Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Skonieczny, Piotr. ‘La Presunzione dell’Imputabilità (can.132 §3 CIC/83): Commento ad un Disposto da Abrogare’ (2013) 90 Angelicum 391.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen Douglas. The Rise and Decline of American Religious Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven D. The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sohm, Rudolf. Kirchenrecht. Leipzig: Dunker & Humblot, 1892.Google Scholar
Solanki, Gopika. Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Equality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, Leo. Church and State in Early Modern England, 1509–1640. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Somerville, R. and Brasington, B.C. Prefaces to Canon Law Books in Latin Christianity: Selected Translations, 500–1245. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Spielmann, Dean. ‘Whither the Margin of Appreciation?’ (2014) 67 Current Legal Problems 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, William. Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History, 9th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Swanson, Robert N. Church and Society in Late Medieval England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Swanson, Robert N.A Canon Lawyer’s Compilation from Fifteenth-Century Yorkshire’ (2012) 69 Journal of Ecclesiastical History 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. Realistic Socio-Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Norman P. ed. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 vols. London: Sheed & Ward, 1990.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
The Canon Law of the Church of England – The Report of the Archbishops’ Commission on Canon Law. London: SPCK, 1947.
Tierney, Brian. The Crisis of Church and State 1050–1300. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, 1964.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. ‘“Only Truth Has Authority”: The Problem of “Reception” in the Decretists and in Johannes de Turrecremata’. In Pennington, Kenneth and Somerville, Robert (eds), Law, Church, and Society: Essays in Honor of Stephan Kuttner. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977 69.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. Medieval Papalism. London, 1949.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. ‘A Decision of the Rota Romana on the Benefit of Clergy in England’ (1967) 13 Studia Gratiana 455.Google Scholar
Van Drunen, David. Natural Law and the Two Kingdoms: A Study in the Development of Reformed Social Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Van der Ven, Johannes A. Human Rights or Religious Rules? Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattimo, Gianni and Rovatti, Pier Aldo eds. Carravetta, Peter, trans. Weak Thought. New York: Suny Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Vinogradoff, Paul. ‘Reason and Conscience in 16th Century Jurisprudence’ (1908) 24 Law Quarterly Review 379.Google Scholar
Vischer, Robert K. Conscience and the Common Good: Reclaiming the Space between the Individual and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Walker, David M. The Scottish Legal System, 6th edn. Edinburgh: W. S. Green, 1992.Google Scholar
Wambaugh, Eugene ed. Littleton’s Tenures. Washington, DC: John Byrne & Co., 1903.Google Scholar
Warren, W.L.A Reappraisal of Simon of Sudbury’ (1959) 10 Journal of Ecclesiastical History 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, John A. Theory of Papal Monarchy in the Thirteenth Century. New York: Fordham University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Weatherhead, James L. The Constitution and Laws of the Church of Scotland. Edinburgh: Church of Scotland Board of Practice and Procedure, 1997.Google Scholar
Welker, Michael and Etzelmüller, Gregor eds. Concepts of Law in the Sciences, Legal Studies, and Theology. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Weller, Paul, Purdam, Kingsley, Ghanea, Nizala, and Cheruvallil-Contractor, Sariya. Religion or Belief, Discrimination and Equality. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, David G.T. ‘Statute Law and Administrative Law’ (1984) Statute Law Review 157.
Williams, Rowan. ‘Civil and Religious Law in England – A Religious Perspective’ (2008) 10 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte Jr, John. ‘The Study of Law and Religion in the United States: An Interim Report’ (2012) 14 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte Jr, John. ‘The Covenant of Marriage: Its Biblical Roots, Historical Influence, and Modern Uses’ (2012) 18 Review on Marriage and Spirituality 147.Google Scholar
Witte Jr, John. The Western Case for Monogamy over Polygamy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte Jr, John. and Alexander, Frank S. eds. Christianity and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Witte Jr, John. and Alexander, Frank S. eds. Christianity and Human Rights: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte Jr, John. and Green, M. Christian eds. Religion and Human Rights: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte Jr, John. and Nichols, Joel A. Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wright, J. Robert. The Church and the English Crown 1305–1334. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1980.Google Scholar
Yourow, Howard C.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence’ (1987) 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 111.Google Scholar
Zander, Michael. The Law Making Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×