Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-ncgjf Total loading time: 0.312 Render date: 2022-01-19T06:10:49.664Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

5 - Restitution Mechanisms and Institutional Frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Scott Leckie
Displacement Solutions, Geneva
Chris Huggins
Land Conflict Research, Ottawa
Get access


Many countries have engaged in processes designed to restore land, housing, and property to displaced persons, refugees, and others who were arbitrarily deprived of their homes, lands, and properties because of conflict. Other countries have dealt effectively with sometimes large-scale restitution claims procedures and have concluded – often very successfully – a comprehensive restitution process. Still others are presently considering proposals designed to allow restitution processes to proceed. Restitution processes are often complex, time-consuming exercises that address inherently controversial and politically charged issues. Care must be taken to manage the expectations of potential claimants and ensure that the restitution process is transparent and clear. The temporal and spatial boundaries of the restitution process, for example, must be clarified, justified, and explained to the population. There is no single blueprint for success, and each country must identify its own way forward while learning from international precedents and respecting national and international laws. However, if the State (generally in conjunction with international organizations) can provide the necessary combination of impartiality, political commitment, and financial support, the pay-offs can be very significant. The legitimacy of the State in the eyes of its citizens, as well as the international community, can be much enhanced, while the resolution of potentially explosive grievances over HLP rights contributes to a more stable and peaceful political and economic legacy.

Conflict and Housing, Land and Property Rights
A Handbook on Issues, Frameworks and Solutions
, pp. 155 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


,Amnesty International (1996) Report: Rwanda and Burundi, the Return Home: Rumours and Realities, London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Bruce, John (2007) Drawing a Line under the Crisis: Reconciling Returnee Land Access and Security in Post-Conflict Rwanda, Humanitarian Practice Network Working Paper, June 2007.
Budlender, G. (2000) “Restitution for Housing and Property Rights: Some Lessons from the South-African ExperienceRefugee Survey Quarterly 19, no. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlick, Madeline (2000) “Protection for Property Rights: A Partial Solution? The Commission for Real Property Claims of Displaced Persons and Refugees (CRPC) in Bosnia and HerzegovinaRefugee Survey Quarterly 19, no. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazmere, R. and Dilip, B. (2000) “Bhutanese Refugees: Rights to Nationality, Return and PropertyForced Migration Review 7.Google Scholar
Hanchinamani, B. (2000) “The Impact of Mozambique's Land Tenure Policy on Refugees and Internally Displaced PersonsHuman Rights Brief 7, no. 2.Google Scholar
Jones, Lisa (2003) “Giving and Taking Away: The Difference between Theory and Practice Regarding Property in Rwanda” in Leckie, Scott (ed.), Returning Home: Housing and Property Restitution Rights of Refugees and Displaced Person, New York: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Nucci, Domenico (2004) “Study on Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation of Land and Property Disputes,” Land and Property Study in Sudan, Project OSRO/SUD/409/HCR.
Palmer, Robin (2003) “Struggling to Secure and Defend the Land Rights of the Poor in AfricaJournal für Entwicklungspolitik (Austrian Journal of Development Studies), XIX, no. 1: 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Permanent Court of Arbitration (2006) Redressing Injustices Through Mass Claims Processes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Rhodri (2005) “Post-Conflict Property Restitution and Refugee Return in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Implications for International Standard-Setting and PracticeNYU Journal of International Law and Politics 37, no. 3 (Spring).Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats