Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T04:07:08.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2018

Get access

Summary

The plight of one subject to a criminal charge is most precarious. His reputation, livelihood and freedom are susceptible to jeopardy as the state pursues the ‘general justifying aim’ of the administration of criminal justice, namely the control of crime which is manifested as detecting, convicting and duly sentencing the guilty. Single-minded attempts to realise this aim would be inconsistent with a civilised society's interest in also ensuring that respect be afforded the interests of those of its members – qua moral agents endowed with autonomy and rationality (dignity) – against whom criminal proceedings are being conducted. Indeed, state failure to afford such respect to its citizens is seriously deleterious to the legitimacy of a process that calls them to answer for alleged criminal wrongdoing. The challenge for the state, therefore, at its most basic level, is to ensure that the practices and procedures applied in its pursuit of crime control are balanced with due respect for the interests of the accused.

It is an expression of this respect that an accused is granted the fundamental right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), a provision which reflects a commitment to the rule of law. Drawing on the spirit of Hayek's definition, Raz postulates that the rule of law broadly has two aspects: people should be ruled by and obey the law; and the law must be capable of guiding the behaviour of its subjects if it is to be obeyed. Crucially, both aspects require correct application of the law and ‘[o]pen and fair hearing, absence of bias and the like’ is essential if confidence is to be had that this has been carried out. Upholding the rule of law through fair trial also implies respect for the dignity of citizens since the state is constrained from exercising arbitrary or oppressive power. In constraining the scope and manner of exercise of state power, the rule of law is an integral element of democratic governance. Accordingly, the right to a fair trial is also acknowledged as holding a prominent place in a democratic society.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Sidhu Omkar
  • Book: The Concept of Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
  • Online publication: 19 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687452.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Sidhu Omkar
  • Book: The Concept of Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
  • Online publication: 19 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687452.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Sidhu Omkar
  • Book: The Concept of Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
  • Online publication: 19 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780687452.001
Available formats
×