Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-wqfsk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-03T22:05:41.537Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

7 - Refining the Meaning of the “Collective” in Collective Guilt: Harm, Guilt, and Apology in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Craig McGarty
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Ana-Maria Bliuc
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Nyla R. Branscombe
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bertjan Doosje
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

“ … While going some distance toward reconciliation with the Aborigines, Australia has moved very little to extinguish racism. Australians' traditional optimism and patriotism were only marginally tamed by the new racial tension in a society that seemed irredeemably racist, sexist and xenophobic.”

Barkan (2000, p. 237)

Barkan's chapter on Australia in his book, The guilt of nations, is a rich source of insights. There is, however, one important way that this quote fails to capture important ideas that we explore in this chapter. Specifically, we propose that collective guilt in Australia cannot be understood by assuming that a uniform ideology that can be summarized neatly as racist, sexist, xenophobic, optimistic, or patriotic is widely shared in Australian society. Rather, there are fault lines within Australian society that reflect social conflict. The social conflict is not so much between racial or ethnic groups, but is about these groups. Collective guilt in Australia has very much to do with an ongoing debate that lends itself extremely well to an intergroup social psychological analysis. In this chapter, we consider the political context and social psychology of collective guilt in Australia and discuss some empirical research on this issue. In conclusion, we suggest a theoretical resolution to the paradoxical relationship between social identification and collective guilt.

The Australian context

Before considering the social psychology of the current situation, it is useful to outline the historical and political context of Australia (matters that are discussed in detail by Augoustinos & LeCouteur, this volume, Chapter 13).

Type
Chapter
Information
Collective Guilt
International Perspectives
, pp. 112 - 129
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (2001). As a matter of fact. Canberra: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission
Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: W. W. Norton
Bliuc, A.-M, McGarty, C., Reynolds, K. J., & Hendres, D. (2002). Understanding the role of social identification and social identity salience in predicting behaviour of political opinion groups. Unpublished manuscript, Australian National University
Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B. & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup relations: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R. & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.). (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford: Blackwell
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–893.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage
Hopkins, N. (2001). National identity: Pride and prejudice?British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 183–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, B. (2001). The effects of comparative context and identification on collective guilt. Unpublished honors thesis, Australian National University
Khalaf, A. & McGarty, C. (2001). Natural kinds, entitative categories, and collective qualities: Comparing mental disorders with other categories. Unpublished manuscript, Australian National University
McGarty, C. (1999). Categorization in social psychology. London: Sage
McGarty, C. (2001). Social identity theory does not maintain that identification produces bias, and self-categorization theory does not maintain that salience is identification: Two comments on Mummendey, Klink, and Brown. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 173–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarty, C. (in press). Hierarchies and groups: The roles of salience, overlap, and background knowledge in selecting meaningful social categorizations from multiple alternatives. In R. Crisp & M. Hewstone (Eds.) Multiple social categorization: Processes, models, and applications. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Mansell, T., Waller, J., Leach, C. W., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2002). Collective guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. Unpublished manuscript, Australian National University
Mummendey, A. & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Reicher, S. D., Hopkins, N., & Condor, S. (1997). Stereotype construction as a strategy of influence. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 94–118). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Roger, M. S. B. (1999). Collective guilt and prosocial behaviour: An Australian perspective. Unpublished Honors thesis, Northern Territiory University
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.) Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford: Blackwell
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S., (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×