Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbjwg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-12T09:45:21.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

five - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2022

Michael Molavi
Affiliation:
University of Oxford Faculty of Law
Get access

Summary

Over the past 20 years, class actions have proliferated globally to more than 35 states. A basic lesson that this globalization of class actions has taught reformers is that legal transplants cannot be wholly adapted into new jurisdictions without accounting for differences in legal culture, history, and politics, including the role of litigation in democracy, the extent to which the use of private enforcement aligns with a state's regulatory governance framework, and the desirability of economically enabling private actors to pursue litigation for public goals. The proliferation of class actions does nevertheless reflect a recognition by policymakers of the need for new procedures to adequately protect groups of vulnerable people against powerful private (and public) entities. These are not, it must be reiterated, efforts to create new substantive rights, but rather simply to introduce procedural mechanisms to give effect to existing substantive law.

In recent years the empowerment of previously marginalized social groups has also contributed to the growth of an accountability culture in which holding wrongdoers to account through legal means has come to be viewed as a viable pathway to justice, particularly where established political channels of influence remain out of reach. Indigenous peoples, women, LGBTQ, racial and ethnic minorities, and disabled people have all deployed class actions as a means to advance their causes and access justice, whichever form this justice may take. In spite of attempts to portray such justice-seekers as engaging in abusive litigation motivated by easy money, such groups often do not (only) seek compensation for their incurred harms, but also public apologies, educational and medical programmes, cessation of wrongful activity, and social recognition of loss.

Despite this proliferation, however, and despite the recognition of the prevalence of collective justiciable problems, many states have introduced extensive ‘brakes’ or so-called ‘safeguards’ to limit the efficacy of the new procedures, based in no small part on fears of importing ‘US-style class actions’ and the successful lobbying efforts of corporate and defendant advocacy groups. These have included limiting class actions to a single sector, strict standing requirements, prohibitions on damages, and attacks on funding sources (notably third party funders). In England and Wales these ‘brakes’ have been a constant feature of proposed reforms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Collective Access to Justice
Assessing the Potential of Class Actions in England and Wales
, pp. 121 - 124
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Michael Molavi, University of Oxford Faculty of Law
  • Book: Collective Access to Justice
  • Online publication: 04 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529210019.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Michael Molavi, University of Oxford Faculty of Law
  • Book: Collective Access to Justice
  • Online publication: 04 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529210019.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Michael Molavi, University of Oxford Faculty of Law
  • Book: Collective Access to Justice
  • Online publication: 04 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529210019.006
Available formats
×