Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:18:13.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Making Media Data

An Introduction to Qualitative Media Research

from Part II - Media Data Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

By
Laura Favaro ,
Rosalind Gill  and
Laura Harvey
Edited by
Virginia Braun ,
Victoria Clarke  and
Debra Gray
Virginia Braun
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Victoria Clarke
Affiliation:
University of the West of England, Bristol
Debra Gray
Affiliation:
University of Winchester
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Collecting Qualitative Data
A Practical Guide to Textual, Media and Virtual Techniques
 , pp. 117 - 118
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Resources: Online

For more information about the ‘Everyday Coupledom’ project, see www.enduringlove.co.uk

The Association of Internet Researchers Ethical guidelines can be found here: http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

The ReStore site offers material related to the assessment and development of new methods for the analysis of media content: http://www.restore.ac.uk/lboro/

Further Resources: Readings

To read more about the mediated intimacy case-study, see Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
To read more about the ‘Lose the Lads’ Mags’ example study, see García-Favaro, L. and Gill, R. (2016). ‘Emasculation nation has arrived’: Sexism rearticulated in online responses to Lose the Lads’ Mags campaign. Feminist Media Studies, 16(3), 379–397.Google Scholar
For research methods for media analysis, see chapter 15 in this accessible introduction to media studies: Branston, G. and Stafford, R. (2010). The media student’s book (5th edn). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
For a focus on media analysis from a gendered perspective, see Chapter 2, in particular, in: Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
For a discussion of some theoretical perspectives around Internet and communications research, see: Rice, R. E. and Fuller, R. P. (2013). Theoretical perspectives in the study of communication and the Internet. In Dutton, W. H. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 353–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Attwood, F. (2009). Mainstreaming sex: The sexualisation of Western culture. London & New York: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Ross, D. and Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through the imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.Google Scholar
Barker, M. J., Gill, R. and Harvey, L. (in press). Mediated intimacy: Sex advice in media culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, A. and Estalella, A. (2012). Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 23–42.Google Scholar
Berger, A. A. (2012). Media analysis techniques (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
British Psychological Society. (2014). Code of human research ethics. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Buckingham, D. and Bragg, S. (2004). Young people, sex, and the media: The facts of life? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cumberbatch, G., Maguire, A., Lyne, V. and Gauntlett, S. (2014). Diversity monitoring: The top TV programmes. Birmingham: Creative Diversity Network. Retrieved from: http://creativediversitynetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/CDN-diversity-portrayal-pilot-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Curran, J. and Seaton, J. (2009). Power without responsibility. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, M. M. and Mosdell, N. (2006). Practical research methods for media and cultural studies: Making people count. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Durham, M. G. (2004). Constructing the ‘new ethnicities’: Media, sexuality, and diaspora identity in the lives of South Asian immigrant girls. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21(2), 140–161.Google Scholar
Dworkin, A. (1981). Men possessing women. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
Edley, N. and Wetherell, M. (2001). Jekyll and Hyde: Men’s constructions of feminism and feminists. Feminism & Psychology, 11(4), 439–457.Google Scholar
Favaro, L. (in press). Postfeminist sexpertise on the ‘porn and men issue’: A transnational perspective. In Harrison, K. and Ogden, C. (eds.), Pornographies: Critical positions. Chester, UK: University of Chester Press.Google Scholar
Favaro, L. and Gill, R. (2016). ‘Emasculation nation has arrived’: Sexism rearticulated in online responses to Lose the Lads’ Mags campaign. Feminist Media Studies, 16(3), 379–397.Google Scholar
Finding, D. (2010). ‘Living in the real world?’ What happens when the media covers feminist research. In Ryan-Flood, R. and Gill, R. (eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 273–290). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. A., Hill, D. L. and Grube, J. W. (2007). Gay, lesbian and bisexual content on television: A quantitative analysis across two seasons. Journal of Homosexuality, 52(3–4), 167–188.Google Scholar
Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
Gill, R. (2017). Discourse analysis in media and communications research. In Kearney, M.-C. and Kackman, M. (eds.), The craft of media criticism: Critical media studies in practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Given, L. M. (ed.) (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
GOV.UK. (2014, 18 November). Exceptions to copyright. Intellectual Property Office. Retrieved from: www.gov.uk/exceptions-to-copyrightGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. and Willis, P. (eds.), Culture, media language: Working papers in cultural studies (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (ed.) (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (2000). Racist ideologies and the media. In Marris, P. and Thornham, S. (eds.), Media studies (pp. 271–282). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, N. and Holmes, B. (2013). Web news readers’ comments: Towards developing a methodology for using on-line comments in social inquiry. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 5(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
Israel, M. and Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. and Ringrose, J. (2014). Sluts that choose vs doormat gypsies: exploring affect the postfeminist, visual moral economy of My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding. Feminist Media Studies, 14(3), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd edn). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, J. and Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am revolution. London: Demos.Google Scholar
Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and language: Theory and practice. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Macharia, S., O’Connor, D. and Ndangam, L. (2010). Who makes the news? Global media monitoring project 2010. London: World Association for Christian Communication.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Global media discourse: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCracken, E. (1993). Decoding women’s magazines. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McKewon, E. (2012). Talking points ammo: The use of neoliberal think tank fantasy themes to deligitimise scientific knowledge of climate change in Australian newspapers. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 277–297.Google Scholar
McRobbie, A. (1991). Feminism and youth culture: From ʻJackieʼ to ʻJust Seventeenʼ. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Markham, A. N. and Buchanan, E. A. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research (version 2.0). Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Chicago: Association of Internet Researchers. Retrieved from: http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Morley, D. and Brunsdon, C. (2005). The nationwide television studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nixon, S. (1996). Hard looks: Masculinities, spectatorship and contemporary consumption. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Noble, S. N. (2014). Teaching Trayvon: Race, media and the politics of spectacle. The Black Scholar, 44(1), 12–29.Google Scholar
Penn, G. (2000). Semiotic analysis of still images. In Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 227–245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Phipps, A. (2014, 4 December). The dark side of impact. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/the-dark-side-of-the-impact-agenda/2017299.articleGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
QUIC (2015a). Qualitative innovations in CAQDAS – analysing audiovisual data using NVivo. Retrieved from: www.surrey.ac.uk/sociology/research/researchcentres/caqdas/support/analysingvisual/analysing_audiovisual_data_using_nvivo.htmGoogle Scholar
QUIC (2015b). Qualitative innovations in CAQDAS – support. Retrieved from: www.surrey.ac.uk/sociology/research/researchcentres/caqdas/support/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Ramazanoglu, C. with Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. (2010). Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist–audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, D. (2011). Obituary for the newspaper? Tracking the tabloid. Journalism, 12(4), 449–466.Google Scholar
Ryan-Flood, R. and Gill, R. (eds.,) (2010). Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Snee, H. (2013). Making ethical decisions in an online context: Reflections on using blogs to explore narratives of experience. Methodological Innovations Online, 8(2), 52–67.Google Scholar
Soliman, J. and Kan, M. (2004). Grounded theory and NVivo: Wars and wins. Proceedings of QualIT 2004: 24–26 November 2004. Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/research/bitstream/handle/10453/7157/2004001837.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
Sveningsson Elm, M. (2009). How do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative Internet research? In Markham, A. N. and Baym, N. K. (eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 69–88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wood, H. and Skeggs, B. (eds.) (2011). Reality television and class. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×