Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-4fqgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-03T13:50:43.993Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2022

Heather Bozant Witcher
Auburn University, Montgomery
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Collaborative Writing in the Long Nineteenth Century
Sympathetic Partnerships and Artistic Creation
, pp. 237 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ablow, Rachel. The Marriage of Minds: Reading Sympathy in the Victorian Marriage Plot. Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Alexiou, Margaret. “Antiphonal Structure and Antithetical Thought.” The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. Edited by Yatromanolakis, Dimitrios and Roilo, Panagiotis. Rowman & Littlefield, 2002, pp. 131–60.Google Scholar
Alfano, Veronica and Stauffer, Andrew M.. Virtual Victorians: Networks, Connections, Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. Bleak Liberalism. University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstruther-Thomson, Clementina. Art and Man: Essays and Fragments. Bodley Head, 1924.Google Scholar
Arata, Stephen. “Realism.” The Cambridge Companion to the Fin de Siècle. Edited by Marshall, Gail. Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 169–78.Google Scholar
Arseneau, Mary. “Pilgrimage and Postponement: Christina Rossetti’s ‘The Prince’s Progress’.” Victorian Poetry, vol. 32, no. 3/4, 1994, pp. 279–98.Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek. Moving Words: Forms of English Poetry. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett Browning, Elizabeth. Aurora Leigh. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Barton, Anna. Nineteenth-Century Poetry and Liberal Thought: Forms of Freedom. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarz, James P.The Collaborator as Thief: Ralegh’s (Re)Vision of ‘The Faerie Queene’.” English Literary History, vol. 63, no. 2, 1996, pp. 279307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Betty T.Finding Mary Shelley in Her Letters.” Romantic Revisions. Edited by Brinkley, Robert and Hanley, Keith. Cambridge University Press, 1998. Reprint in Critical Essays on Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Edited by Mary Lowe-Evans. Simon and Schuster, 1998, pp. 118–32.Google Scholar
Bennett, Betty T. Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley: An Introduction. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bickle, Sharon. The Fowl and the Pussycat: Love Letters of Michael Field, 1876–1909. University of Virginia Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Blain, Virginia. “‘Michael Field, the Two-Headed Nightingale’: Lesbian Text as Palimpsest.” Women’s History Review, vol. 52, no. 2, 1996, pp. 239–57.Google Scholar
Blair, Kirstie. Victorian Poetry and the Culture of the Heart. Clarendon, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristow, Joseph. “Reforming Victorian Poetry: Poetics after 1832.” The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Poetry. Edited by Bristow, Joseph. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristow, Joseph. “Vernon Lee’s Art of Feeling.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, vol. 25, no. 1, 2006, pp. 117–39.Google Scholar
Britton, Jeanne M.Novelistic Sympathy in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 48, no. 1, 2009, pp. 322.Google Scholar
Brooker, Jewel Spears. “Common Ground and Collaboration in T.S. Eliot.” The Centennial Review, vol. 25, no. 3, 1981, pp. 225–38.Google Scholar
Bunting, Kirsty. “‘Feelings of Vivid Fellowship’: Vernon Lee and Clementina Anstruther-Thomson’s Quest for Collaborative ‘Aesthetic Sociability’.” Forum for Modern Language Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, 2016, pp. 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdett, Carolyn. “Is Empathy the End of Sentimentality?Journal of Victorian Culture, vol. 16, no. 2, 2011, pp. 259–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Marilyn. “Shelley and the Question of Joint Authorship.” Evaluating Shelley. Edited by Clark, Timothy and Hogle, Jerrold E.. Edinburgh University Press, 1996, pp. 42–7.Google Scholar
Byrne, Joseph. “Blake, Joseph Johnson, and The Gates of Paradise.” The Wordsworth Circle, vol. 44, no. 2/3, 2013, pp. 131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Kenneth Neill, ed. The Carl H. Pforzheimer Library: Shelley and His Circle, 1773–1822. Vol. II, Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Cameron, Kenneth Neill, ed. The Carl H. Pforzheimer Library: Shelley and His Circle, 1773–1822. Vol. III, Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A. England’s First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. An Archaeology of Sympathy: The Sentimental Mode in Literature and Cinema. University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, James. “The Languages of Sentiment.” Textual Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, 2008, pp. 2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Alison. The Afterlife of Christina Rossetti. St. Martin’s Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Peter. Liberals and Social Democrats. Cambridge University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Michael. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Art Terms – Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Michael. “Whittier, Ballad Reading, and the Culture of Nineteenth-Century Poetry.” Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, vol. 64, no. 3, 2008, pp. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, Vineta. Vernon Lee: A Literary Biography. University of Virginia Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Colebrook, Frank. William Morris: Master Printer. Edited by Peterson, William. Yellow Barn Press, 1989, p. 34.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Liberalism and Sociology. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Compton-Rickett, Arthur. William Morris: A Study in Personality. Dutton & Co., 1913. Scholar
Corbett, Mary Jean. “Reading Mary Shelley’s Journals: Romantic Subjectivity and Feminist Criticism.” The Other Mary Shelley: Beyond Frankenstein. Edited by Fisch, Audrey A., Mellor, Anne K., and Schor, Esther H.. Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 7387.Google Scholar
Cox, Jeffrey N. and Galperin, William. “Joseph Johnson.” Wordsworth Circle, vol. 40, no. 2/3, 2009, pp. 93–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Walter. “Introduction.” The Easter Art Annual for 1898: The Work of Walter Crane with Notes by the Artist. Edited by Crane, Walter. Extra issue of Art Journal, 1898, pp. 132.Google Scholar
Crawford, Alan, ed. By Hammer and Hand: The Arts and Crafts Movement in Birmingham. Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, 1984.Google Scholar
Crowell, Ellen. “Matthew Potolsky, The Decadent Republic of Letters: Taste, Politics, and Cosmopolitan Community from Baudelaire to Beardsley.” Modern Philology, vol. 113, no. 4, 2016, pp. 275–7.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. Theory of the Lyric. Harvard University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. “Empathy, Sympathy, Care.” Philosophical Studies, vol. 89, no. 2, 1998, pp. 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. “Sympathetic Liberalism: Recent Work on Adam Smith.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2, 1999, pp. 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisoff, Dennis. “The Queer Ecology of Vernon Lee’s Transient Affections.” Feminist Modernist Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, 148–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSpain, Jessica. “A Book Arts Pilgrimage: Arts and Crafts Socialism and the Kelmscott Chaucer.” Journal of William Morris Studies, vol. 15, no. 4, 2004, pp. 7490.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Emma. We Are Michael Field. Absolute Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dowling, Linda. The Vulgarization of Art: The Victorians and Aesthetic Democracy. University of Virginia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Draucker, Shannon. “Hearing, Sensing, Feeling Sound: On Music and Physiology in Victorian England, 1857–1894.” Edited by Felluga, Dino Franco. BRANCH: Britain, Representation and Nineteenth-Century History. Extension of Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net, 2018. Scholar
Duclaux, Madame (Mary Robinson). “In Casa Paget.” Country Life, vol. 28, 1907, pp. 935–7.Google Scholar
Duncan, Ian, ed. Introduction. The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner. James Hogg. Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. ixxxxiv.Google Scholar
Eastham, Andrew. “Bacchic Transference and Ecstatic Faith: Michael Field’s Callirrhoë and the Origins of Drama.” Women’s Studies, vol. 40, no. 4, 2011, pp. 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ede, Lisa and Andrea, Lunsford. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. SIU Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R.‘Our Brains Struck Fire Each from Each’: Disidentification, Difference, and Desire in the Collaborative Aesthetics of Michael Field.” Economies of Desire at the Victorian Fin de Siecle: Libidinal Lives. Edited by Ford, Jane, Keates, Kim Edwards, and Pulham, Patricia. Routledge, 2015. pp. 180203.Google Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. Women’s Literary Collaboration, Queerness, and Late-Victorian Culture. Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Stefano. British Aestheticism and Ancient Greece. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Paula R. and Scott-Kilvert, Diana. The Journals of Mary Shelley, 1814–1844. 2 vols. Clarendon, 1987.Google Scholar
Ferris, Ina. Book-Men, Book Clubs, and the Romantic Literary Sphere. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Michael. Binary Star: Leaves from the Journal and Letters of Michael Field, 1846–1914. Edited by Treby, Ivor C.. De Blackland Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Field, Michael. “The Online Diaries of Michael Field.” Accessed via the Michael Field Diary Archive, Victorian Lives and Letters Consortium, Center for Digital Humanities, University of South Carolina, current as of November 2021. Scholar
Field, Michael. The Tragic Mary. George Bell and Sons, 1890.Google Scholar
Field, Michael. Underneath the Bough: A Book of Verses. Mosher, Thomas B., 1898.Google Scholar
Fine Art Gossip.” Athenaeum, no. 3391. October 22, 1892. Compiled in The Athenaeum Journal of Literature, Science, the Fine Arts, Music, and the Drama: July to December 1892. John C. Francis, 1892, pp. 559–60.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty. Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Ian, “Some Aspects of Aestheticism.” Twilight of the Dawn: Studies in English Literature in Transition. Edited by Brack, O. M., Jr. University of Arizona Press, 1987, pp. 133.Google Scholar
Flint, Christopher. Family Fictions: Narrative and Domestic Relations in Britain, 1688–1798. Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Forman-Barzilai, Fonna. Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy: Cosmopolitanism and Moral Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Michael L. The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Fulford, Tim. Romantic Poetry and the Literary Coteries. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnier, Regenia. Individualism, Decadence and Globalization: On the Relationship of Part to Whole, 1859–1920. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaull, Marilyn. “Joseph Johnson: Webmaster.” Wordsworth Circle, vol. 40, no. 2/3, 2009, pp. 107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasier, J. Bruce. William Morris and the Early Days of the Socialist Movement. Longman, 1921.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. Political Justice. The Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin. Edited by Philip, Mark. Vol. 4. Pickering & Chatto, 1993.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Gail Lynn. “Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s ‘Revising Hand’: His Illustrations for Christina Rossetti’s Poems.” Victorian Poetry, vol. 20, no. 3/4, 1982, pp. 145–59.Google Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren M.E.Beyond the Panopticon: The Critical Challenge of a Liberal Society.” Victorian Literature and the Victorian State: Character and Governance in a Liberal Society. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, pp. 131.Google Scholar
Green, T.H. Prolegomena to Ethics. Edited by Bradley, A.C.. Clarendon, 1883. Scholar
Greengarten, I.M. Thomas Hill Green and the Development of Liberal-Democratic Thought. University of Toronto Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, Rae. “1909: The Introduction of the Word ‘Empathy’ into English.” BRANCH: Britain, Representation and Nineteenth-Century History. Edited by Felluga, Dino Franco. Extension of Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net. Scholar
Greiner, Rae. Sympathetic Realism in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Griswold, Jr., Charles L.Imagination: Morals, Science, and Arts.” The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 2256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. “Introduction.” The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. viixxiv.Google Scholar
Hadley, Elaine. Living Liberalism: Practical Citizenship in Mid-Victorian Britain. University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Emily. “Michael Field and the Detachable Lyric.” Victorian Studies, vol. 50, no. 2, 2008, pp. 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Emily. Second Person Singular: Late Victorian Women Poets and the Bonds of Verse. University of Virginia Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hall, Jason David and Murray, Alex, eds. Decadent Poetics: Literature and Form at the British Fin de Siècle. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. “The Eighteenth-Century Context of Sympathy from Spinoza to Kant.” Sympathy: A History. Edited by Schliesser, Eric. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hatch, James C., “Disruptive Affects: Shame, Disgust, and Sympathy in Frankenstein,” European Romantic Review, vol. 19, no. 1, 2008, pp. 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Daisy. Young Romantics: The Tangled Loves of English Poetry’s Greatest Generation. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010.Google Scholar
Helsinger, Elizabeth K. Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts: Dante Gabriel Rossetti & William Morris. Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Martin. “Diary, Autobiography and the Practice of Life History.” Life Writing and Victorian Culture. Edited by Armigoni, David. Ashgate, 2006, pp. 2140.Google Scholar
Hill, George Birbeck, ed. Letters of Dante Gabriel Rossetti to William Allingham, 1854–1870. T. Fisher Unwin, 1897. Scholar
Hines, Thomas. Collaborative Form: Studies in the Relations of the Arts. Kent State, 1991.Google Scholar
Hughes, Linda. Cambridge Introduction to Victorian Poetry. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Linda. “A Club of Their Own: The ‘Literary Ladies,’ New Women Writers, and Fin-de-Siècle Authorship.” Victorian Literature and Culture, vol. 35, no. 1, 2007, pp. 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Michael D. Faith in Poetry: Verse Style as a Mode of Religious Belief. Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Inge, M. Thomas. “Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, vol. 116, no. 3, 2001, pp. 623–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Audrey. Scenes of Sympathy: Identity and Representation in Victorian Fiction. Cornell University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamison, Anne. Poetics en Passant: Redefining the Relationship Between Victorian and Modern Poetry. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Robert. Marketing Modernism in Fin-de-siècle Europe. Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jervis, John. Sympathetic Sentiments: Affect, Emotion and Spectacle in the Modern World. Bloomsbury, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Lionel. “The Tragic Mary. By Michael Field (Bell).” The Academy, no. 954, 1890, pp. 123–4. Scholar
Kaplan, Fred. Sacred Tears: Sentimentality in Victorian Literature. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Keen, Suzanne. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelvin, Norman, ed. The Collected Letters of William Morris, 1889–1892. Vol. III. Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kelvin, Norman, ed. The Collected Letters of William Morris, 1893–1896. Vol. IV. Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kelvin, Norman, ed. “News from Nowhere and The Spoils of Poynton: Interiors and Exteriors.” William Morris: Centenary Essays. Edited by Faulkner, Peter and Preston, Peter. Exeter University Press, 1999, pp. 107–21.Google Scholar
Kent, David A., ed. The Achievement of Christina Rossetti. Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Koestenbaum, Wayne. Double Talk: The Erotics of Male Literary Collaboration. Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Kooistra, Lorraine Janzen. Christina Rossetti and Illustration. Ohio University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kooistra, Lorraine Janzen. Poetry, Pictures, and Popular Publishing: The Illustrated Gift Book and Victorian Visual Culture, 1855–1875. Ohio University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Krawczyk, Scott. Romantic Literary Families. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchich, Greg. Keats, Shelley, and Romantic Spenserianism. Penn State, 2010.Google Scholar
Laird, Holly. Women Coauthors. University of Illinois Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon. Belcaro: Being Essays on Sundry Aesthetical Questions. T. Fisher Unwin, 1897.Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon. Introduction. Art and Man: Essays and Fragments, Edited by Ansthruther-Thomson, C.. Bodley Head, 1924, pp. 36.Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon. Selected Letters of Vernon Lee, 1856–1935, vol. 1, 1865–1884. Edited by Gagel, Amanda. Routledge, 2017, p. 706.Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon and Anstruther-Thomson, Clementina. “Beauty and Ugliness.” Contemporary Review, vols. 27 and 28, October and November 1897, pp. 544–68, 669–88.Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon and Anstruther-Thomson, Clementina. ‘Beauty and Ugliness’ and Other Studies in Psychological Aesthetics. John Lane, 1912.Google Scholar
Leighton, Angela. “Ghosts, Aestheticism and ‘Vernon Lee’. Victorian Literature and Culture, vol. 28, no. 1, 2001, pp. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leps, Marie-Christine. Apprehending the Criminal: The Production of Deviance in Nineteenth-Century Discourse. Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
London, Bette. Writing Double: Women’s Literary Partnerships. Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, Maragret. Sister Dora. Cambridge University Press, 1880.Google Scholar
MacCarthy, Fiona. William Morris: A Life for Our Time. Alfred Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar
Mackail, John William and William, John. The Life of William Morris, 2 vols. Longmans, 1899.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Kristin. “Ethics and Empathy in the Literary Criticism of Vernon Lee.” Nineteenth-Century Prose, vol. 43, no. 1/2, 2016, pp. 193210.Google Scholar
Malfait, Olivia. “‘Against the World’: Michael Field, Female Marriage, and the Aura of Amateurism.” English Studies, vol. 96, no. 2, 2015, pp. 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltz, Diana. Beauty for the People: British Aestheticism and the Urban Working Classes, 1870–1900. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Maltz, Diana. “Engaging ‘Delicate Brains’: From Working-Class Enculturation to Upper-Class Lesbian Liberation in Vernon Lee and Kit Anstruther-Thomson’s Psychological Aesthetics.” Women and British Aestheticism. Edited by Schaffer, Talia and Psomiades, Kathy Alexis. University of Virginia Press, 1999, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar
Mandler, Peter. “Review: Elaine Hadley’s Living Liberalism.” American Historical Review, vol. 116, no. 3, 2011, pp. 871–2.Google Scholar
Mannocchi, Phyllis F.Vernon Lee and Kit Anstruther-Thomson: A Study of Love and Collaboration Between Romantic Friends.” Women’s Studies, vol. 12, 1986, pp. 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Laura. Auto/Biographical Discourses: Criticism, Theory, Practice. Manchester University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Marsh, Jan. Christina Rossetti: A Literary Biography. Faber & Faber, 2012.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. “Adam Smith and the Theatricality of Moral Sentiments.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 10, no. 5, 1984, pp. 592613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, David. The Figure of Theatre: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot. Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Martin, Kirsty. Modernism and the Rhythms of Sympathy: Vernon Lee, Virginia Woolf, D.H. Lawrence. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Meredith‘Imperfectly Civilized’: Ballads, Nations, and Histories of Form.” English Literary History, vol. 82, no. 2, 2015, pp. 345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Catherine. Scents and Sensibility: Perfume in Victorian Literary Culture. Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Catherine and Pulham, Patricia, eds. Vernon Lee: Decadence, Ethics, Aesthetics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome. Black Riders: The Visible Language of Modernism. Princeton University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome. Dante Gabriel Rossetti and the Game That Must Be Lost. Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome. The Textual Condition. Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mellor, Anne. Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. Methuen, 1988.Google Scholar
Miller, Elizabeth Carolyn. Slow Print: Literary Radicalism and Late Victorian Print Culture. Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Miller, Elizabeth Carolyn. “Sustainable Socialism: William Morris on Waste.” The Journal of Modern Craft, vol. 4, no. 1, 2011, pp. 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, Leonidas. “Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stage of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 35, 2003, pp. 6390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. and Sturge, D.C., eds. Works and Days: From the Journal of Michael Field. John Murray, 1933.Google Scholar
Morgan, Benjamin. The Outward Mind: Materalist Aesthetics in Victorian Science and Literature. Chicago University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, William. “Art and Socialism (1884).” The Collected Works of William Morris: Signs of Change; Lectures on Socialism. Vol. 23. Edited by Morris, May. Longmans, 1915, pp. 192214.Google Scholar
Morris, William. “Art, Craft, and Life. A Chat with Mr. William Morris.” The Daily Chronicle. October 9, 1893.Google Scholar
Morris, William. “How I Became a Socialist.” Justice: 1894. Rpt. in News from Nowhere and Other Writings. Edited by Wilmer, Clive. Penguin, 2004, pp. 378–83.Google Scholar
Morris, William. The Ideal Book: Essays and Lectures on the Arts of the Book. Edited by Peterson, William S.. University of California Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, William. “The Lesser Arts.” Hopes and Fears for Art. London: 1882. Rpt. in News from Nowhere and Other Writings. Edited by Wilmer, Clive. Penguin, 2004, pp. 233–54.Google Scholar
Morris, William. “The Lesser Arts of Life.” Architecture, Industry & Wealth: Collected Papers by William Morris. Longmans, 1902, pp. 3779.Google Scholar
Morris, William. News from Nowhere and Other Writings. Edited by Wilmer, Clive. Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
Morris, William. A Note by William Morris on His Aims in Founding the Kelmscott Press. Edited by Cockerell, Sydney. Kelmscott Press, 1898.Google Scholar
Morris, William. “Some Thoughts on the Ornamented Manuscripts of the Middle Ages (c.1892).” William Morris Archive. Scholar
Morris, William. The Unpublished Lectures. Edited by LeMire, Eugene D.. Wayne State University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Morris, William. “The Woodcuts of Gothic Books.” Journal of the Society of Arts, vol. 40, 1892, pp. 246–57.Google Scholar
Morrison, Lucy. “Conduct (Un)Becoming to Ladies of Literature: How-to Guides for Romantic Women Writers.” Studies in Philology, vol. 99, no. 2, 2002, pp. 202–28.Google Scholar
Murray, E.B.Shelley’s Contribution to Mary’s Frankenstein.” Keats-Shelley Memorial Bulletin, vol. 29, 1978, pp. 5068.Google Scholar
Newlyn, Lucy. “Pantisocracy.” The Cambridge Companion to Coleridge. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieli, Russell. “Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 48, 1986, pp. 611–24.Google Scholar
Noble, Marianne. Rethinking Sympathy and Human Contact in Nineteenth-Century American Literature: Hawthorne, Douglass, Stowe, Dickinson. Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, Jennifer. Literary Networks and Dissenting Print Culture in Romantic-Period Ireland. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, eds. Michael Field: Decadent Moderns. Ohio University Press, 2019, pp. v + 289.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter. Greek Studies: A Series of Essays. Macmillan, 1910.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter. The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry: The 1893 Text. Edited by Hill, Donald L.. University of California Press, 1980, p. 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Walter. “Style.” Appreciations: With an Essay on Style. Macmillan, 1889, pp. 136.Google Scholar
Pater, William. “The School of Giorgione.” The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry: The 1893 Text. Edited by Hill, Donald L.. University of California Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, William S. The Kelmscott Press: A History of William Morris’s Typographical Adventure. University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Pevsner, Nikolaus. Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius. Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Pinch, Adela. Thinking About Other People in Nineteenth-Century British Writing. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Potolsky, Matthew. The Decadent Republic of Letters: Taste, Politics, and Cosmopolitan Community from Baudelaire to Beardsley. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, Yopie and Jackson, Virginia, eds. The Lyric Theory Reader. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Prins, Yopie and Jackson, Virginia, eds. “Lyrical Studies.” Victorian Literature and Culture, vol. 27, no. 2, 1999, pp. 521–30.Google Scholar
Pujol, Angel. Political Fraternity: Democracy Beyond Freedom and Equality. Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Ricketts, Charles. “Michael Field.” Charles Ricketts, Everything for Art: Selected Writings. Edited by Frankel, Nicholas. The Rivendale Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rieger, James. Introduction to Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus (The 1818 Text), 1974. Rpt. University of Chicago Press, 1982, pp. xixxxvii.Google Scholar
Robertson, Ritchie. “From Martyr to Vampire: The Figure of Mary Stuart in Drama from Vondel to Swinburne.” Who Is This Schiller Now?: Essays on His Reception and Significance. Edited by High, Jeffrey L., Martin, Nicholas, and Oeller, Norbert. Camden House, 2011, pp. 321–39.Google Scholar
Robinson, Charles E.Collaboration and Ventriloquism in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” La Questione Romantica, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 2939.Google Scholar
Robinson, Charles E. The Frankenstein Notebooks: A Facsimile Editions: Manuscripts of the Younger Romantics. Vol. 9. Garland Publishing, 1996.Google Scholar
Robinson, Charles E.Texts in Search of an Editor: Reflections on The Frankenstein Notebooks and on Editorial Authority.” Textual Studies and the Common Reader: Essays on Editing Novels and Novelists. Edited by Pettit, Alexander. University of Georgia Press, 2000, pp. 91100.Google Scholar
Robinson, Duncan. William Morris, Edward Burne-Jones and the Kelmscott Chaucer. Gordon Fraser, 1982.Google Scholar
Robinson, Agnes Mary F.In Casa Paget.” Country Life (November 28, 1907): 935–7.Google Scholar
Ross, Robert. Aubrey Beardsley. John Lane, 1909. Scholar
Rossetti, Christina. Goblin Market, the Prince’s Progress, and Other Poems. Macmillan, 1875. Scholar
Rossetti, Christina. The Letters of Christina Rossetti: A Digital Edition. Edited by Harrison, Antony H.. University of Virginia Press, 2006. Scholar
Rossetti, Christina. The Poetical Works of Christina Georgina Rossetti with Memoir and Notes. Edited by Rossetti, William Michael. Macmillan, 1904.Google Scholar
Rossetti, Dante Gabriel. Collected Poetry and Prose. Edited by McGann, Jerome. Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rossetti, Dante Gabriel. Complete Writings and Pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti: A Hypermedia Archive. Edited by McGann, Jerome. IATH and NINES Consortium, 2008. Scholar
Rossetti, Dante Gabriel. The Correspondence of Dante Gabriel Rossetti. vol. 4. Edited by Fredeman, William E.. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rossetti, William Michael, ed. The Family Letters of Christina Georgina Rossetti. Scribner, 1908. Scholar
Rossetti, William Michael, ed. Rossetti Papers, 1862–1870. Sands & Co., 1903. Scholar
Rossetti, William Michael, ed. Ruskin: Rossetti: PreRaphaelitism, Papers 1854 to 1862. George Allen, 1899. Scholar
Rowland, Christopher. Blake and the Bible. Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rudy, Jason R. Electric Meters: Victorian Physiological Poetics. Ohio University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Saville, Julia F.The Poetic Imaging of Michael Field.” The Fin-de-Siècle Poem: English Literary Culture and the 1890s. Edited by Bristow, Joseph. Ohio University Press, 2005, pp. 178206.Google Scholar
Sawtell, Margaret. Christina Rossetti: Her Life and Religion. A.R. Mowbray, 1955.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Talia and Psomiades, Kathy, eds. Women and British Aestheticism. University of Virginia Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Edited by Robinson, Charles E.. Vintage, 2009a.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Edited by Hindle, Maurice. Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. “Introduction to the 1831 Edition.” Frankenstein. Edited by Robinson, Charles E.. Vintage, 2009b, pp. 437–43.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. The Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. 3 vols. Edited by Bennett, Betty T.. Johns Hopkins University Press, 19801988.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Vol. 1. Edited by Ingpen, Roger. Pitman & Sons, 1909.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Vol. 1. Edited by Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Moxon, 1839. Scholar
Skoblow, Jeffrey. “Beyond Reading: Kelmscott and the Modern.” The Victorian Illustrated Book. Edited by Maxwell, Richard. University of Virginia Press, 2002, pp. 239–58.Google Scholar
Slinn, E. Warwick. “Experimental Form in Victorian Poetry.” The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Poetry. Edited by Bristow, Joseph. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 4666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sly, Ronald. A Little Job for William Morris: A Memoir of Robert Catterson-Smith. Jones and Sons, 2015.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 12.Google Scholar
Smith, Johanna M. “Hideous Progenies”: Texts of Frankenstein. Texts and Textuality: Textual Instability, Theory, and Interpretation. Edited by Cohen, Philip. Garland, 1997, pp. 121–40.Google Scholar
Smulders, Sharon. Christina Rossetti Revisited. Twain, 1996.Google Scholar
Somerville, E.Œ. and Ross, Martin. “Two of a Trade.” Irish Writing, vol. 1, 1946, pp. 7985.Google Scholar
Sparling, Henry Halliday. The Kelmscott Press and William Morris Master-Craftsman. Macmillan, 1924. Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. Ethics. Trans. C.H.R. Parkinson. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Spuybroek, Lars. The Sympathy of Things. 2nd ed. Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Stetz, Margaret and Wilson, Cheryl A., eds. Michael Field and Their World. The Rivendale Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Stillinger, Jack. Multiple Authorship and the Myth of Solitary Genius. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Stocking, Marion Kingston, ed. The Journals of Claire Clairmont. Harvard University Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Marjorie. “A Cinderella Among the Muses.” Victorian Literature and Culture, vol. 21, 1993, pp. 233–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Marjorie and Thompson, Judith, eds. Literary Couplings: Writing Couples, Collaborators, and the Construction of Authorship. University of Wisconsin Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Mary. Michael Field. G.G. Harrap, 1922.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert. “Beyond Sympathy and Empathy: Adam Smith’s Concept of Fellow-Feeling.” Economics and Philosophy, vol. 18, no. 1, 2002, pp. 6387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Emily W. Mary Shelley: Romance and Reality. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Suriano, Gregory R. The British Pre-Raphaelite Illustrators. Oak Knoll, 2005.Google Scholar
Symons, Arthur. “The Decadent Movement in Literature.” Harper’s Monthly Magazine 1893, pp. 858–67.Google Scholar
Taft, Vicki. “The Tragic Mary: A Case Study in Michael Field’s Understanding of Sexual Politics.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts, vol. 23, no. 2, 2001, pp. 265–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taussig, Gurion. Coleridge and the Idea of Friendship, 1789–1804. University of Delaware Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Thain, Marion. ‘Michael Field’: Poetry, Aestheticism and the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thain, Marion. ed. The Lyric Poem: Formations and Transformation. Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thain, Marion and Ana, Parejo Vadillo, eds. Michael Field, The Poet: Published and Manuscript Materials. Broadview, 2009.Google Scholar
Thain, Marion and Ana, Parejo Vadillo, eds. “The Birmingham Municipal School of Art. With Many Illustrations of Its Students’ Work–I.” Studio, vol. 2, 1894, pp. 909.Google Scholar
Thomas, David Wayne. “Replicating Agency: Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Victorian Manchester.” Cultivating Victorians: Liberal Culture and the Aesthetic. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004, pp. 125–55.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kate. “Walter Pater and Michael Field: The Correspondence, with Other Unpublished Manuscript Materials.” Pater Newsletter, Spring 2014, pp. 2785.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kate. “‘What Time We Kiss’: Michael Field’s Queer Temporalities.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, vol. 13, no. 2–3, 2007, pp. 353–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townley, Sarah. “Rewriting Paterian Sympathy: Vernon Lee and Elitist Empathy,Literature Compass, vol. 9, no 11, 2012, pp. 861–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townley, Sarah. “Vernon Lee and Elitism: Redefining British Aestheticism.” English Literature in Transition Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, 2011, pp. 523–38.Google Scholar
Tyler, Colin. “Thomas Hill Green.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford University, Summer 2011. Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. “Aestheticism and Decoration: At Home with Michael Field.” Cahiers Victoriens & Edouardiens, vol. 74, 2011, pp. 1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. “Another Renaissance: The Decadent Poetic Drama of A.C. Swinburne and Michael Field.” Decadent Poetics: Literature and Form at the British Fin de Siècle. Edited by Hall, Jason David and Murray, Alex. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, p. 119.Google Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. “New Woman Poets and the Culture of the Salon at the Fin-de-Siècle.” Women: A Cultural Review, vol. 10, no. 1, 1999, pp. 2234.Google Scholar
Vallance, Aymer. “The Revival of Tapestry-Weaving: An Interview with Mr. William Morris.” The International Studio, vol. 3, 1894, p. 101.Google Scholar
Vallance, Aymer. “Sir Edward Burne-Jones’s Designs for Painted Glass.” The International Studio, vol. 42, 1910, pp. 91103.Google Scholar
Vaninskaya, Anna. William Morris and the Idea of Community: Romance, History, and Propaganda, 1880–1914. Edinburgh University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Jack Russell. Adam Smith’s Pluralism: Rationality, Education, and the Moral Sentiments. Yale University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Jack Russell. “Sympathy, Difference, and Education: Social Unity in the Work of Adam Smith.” Economics and Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 1, 2006, pp. 79111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weliver, Phyllis. “Introduction.” The Figure of Music in Nineteenth-Century British Poetry. Edited by Weliver, Phyllis. Ashgate, 2005; paperback publication Routledge, 2016, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Weliver, Phyllis. Mary Gladstone and the Victorian Salon: Music, Literature, Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weliver, Phyllis. “Music, Crowd Control and the Female Performer in Trilby.” The Idea of Music in Victorian Fiction Edited by Fuller, Sophie and Losseff, Nicky. Ashgate, 2013, pp. 5780.Google Scholar
Whelan, Timothy. Other British Voices: Women, Poetry, and Religion, 1766–1840. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Ross. Shelley and the Apprehension of Life. Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckles, Andrew O., Rehbein, Angela, eds. Women’s Literary Networks and Romanticism: “A Tribe of Authoresses.” Liverpool University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcher, Heather Bozant. “‘with me’: The Sympathetic Collaboration of Mary Godwin and Percy Bysshe Shelley.” Forum for Modern Language Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, 2016, pp. 144–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcher, Heather Bozant and Huseby, Amy Kahrmann, eds. Defining Pre-Raphaelite Poetics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Work of Walter Crane.” Art Journal, Easter Annual, 1898, p. 10.Google Scholar
York, Lorraine. Rethinking Women’s Collaborative Writing: Power, Difference, Property. University of Toronto Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, Christa. Vernon Lee: Aesthetics, History, and the Victorian Female Intellectual. Ohio University Press, 2003.Google Scholar