Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Case 9 When and How to Scan
- Case 10 Role of Plain Films in Spine Trauma
- Case 11 CT Streak Artifacts
- Case 12 Utility of MRI after Negative CT
- Case 13 Stable vs. Unstable Spine Injuries
- Case 14 Whiplash Injury
- Case 15 Findings Likely to Be Missed
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Case 12 - Utility of MRI after Negative CT
from Section 2 - Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2018
Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Case 9 When and How to Scan
- Case 10 Role of Plain Films in Spine Trauma
- Case 11 CT Streak Artifacts
- Case 12 Utility of MRI after Negative CT
- Case 13 Stable vs. Unstable Spine Injuries
- Case 14 Whiplash Injury
- Case 15 Findings Likely to Be Missed
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal TraumaA Case-Based Approach, pp. 28Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Mavros, MN, Kaafarani, HM, Mejaddam, AY, et al. Additional imaging in alert trauma patients with cervical spine tenderness and a negative computed tomographic scan: is it needed? World J Surg 2015;39:2685–2690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badhiwala, JH, Lai, CK, Alhazzani, W, et al. Cervical spine clearance in obtunded patients after blunt traumatic injury: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:429–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, MB, Humble, SS, Cullinane, DC, et al. Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78:430–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, IA, Moukalled, A, Yu, E, et al. A systematic review of the need for MRI for the clearance of cervical spine injury in obtunded blunt trauma patients after normal cervical spine CT. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2014;7:251–255.Google ScholarPubMed
Satahoo, SS, Davis, JS, Garcia, GD, et al. Sticking our neck out: is magnetic resonance imaging needed to clear an obtunded patient’s cervical spine? J Surg Res 2014;187:225–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, BG, Swartz, C, Quigley, MR, et al. Cervical spine clearance in the traumatically injured patient: is multidetector CT scanning sufficient alone? Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:576–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackland, HM, Cameron, PA, Wolfe, R, et al. Outcomes at 12 months after early magnetic resonance imaging in acute trauma patients with persistent midline cervical tenderness and negative computed tomography. Spine 2013;38:1068–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khanna, P, Chau, C, Dublin, A, et al. The value of cervical magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the obtunded or comatose patient with cervical trauma, no other abnormal neurological findings, and a normal cervical computed tomography. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:699–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panczykowski, DM, Tomycz, ND, Okonkwo, DO. Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: meta-analysis of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma. J Neurosurg 2011;115:541–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 1
- Cited by