Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-xtmlv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-29T08:05:36.817Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Section 6 - Trauma to Compromised Spine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

Zoran Rumboldt
Medical University of South Carolina
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
A Case-Based Approach
, pp. 117 - 129
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Cho, WI, Chang, UK. Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:177183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishiyama, M, Fuwa, S, Numaguchi, Y, Kobayashi, N, Saida, Y. Pedicle involvement on MR imaging is common in osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:668673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thawait, SK, Marcus, MA, Morrison, WB, Klufas, RA, Eng, J, Carrino, JA. Research synthesis: what is the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E736E744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thawait, SK, Kim, J, Klufas, RA, Morrison, WB, Flanders, AE, Carrino, JA, Ohno-Machado, L. Comparison of four prediction models to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures according to MRI feature analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:493502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdel-Wanis, ME, Solyman, MT, Hasan, NM. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating vertebral compression fractures caused by malignancy, osteoporosis, and infections. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011;19:145150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed


Klazen, CA, Lohle, PN, de Vries, J, Jansen, FH, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2010;376:10851092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinckman, MA, Chau, C, Ross, JS. Marrow edema variability in acute spine fractures. Spine J 2015;15:454460. doi: 10.1016/jspinee.2014.09.032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerdhem, P. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures: vertebral fractures. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2013;27:743755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKiernan, F, Faciszewski, T. Intravertebral clefts in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:14141419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanchiku, T, Taguchi, T, Kawai, S. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis and new classification of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Orthop Sci 2003;8:463466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed


Lyders, EM, Whitlow, CT, Baker, MD, Morris, PP. Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:201210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longhino, V, Bonora, C, Sansone, V. The management of sacral stress fractures: current concepts. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2011;8:1923.Google ScholarPubMed
Kortman, K, Ortiz, O, Miller, T, et al. Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:461466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deschamps Perdomo, A, Tomé-Bermejo, F, Piñera, AR, Alvarez, L. Misdiagnosis of sacral stress fracture: an underestimated cause of low back pain in pregnancy? Am J Case Rep 2015;16:6064.Google ScholarPubMed


Westerveld, LA, Verlaan, JJ, Oner, FC. Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders: a systematic review of the literature on treatment, neurological status and complications. Eur Spine J 2009;18:145156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caron, T, Bransford, R, Nguyen, Q, et al. Spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders. Spine 2010;35:E458E464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moussallem, CD, McCutheon, BA, Clarke, MJ, et al. Perioperative complications in open versus percutaneous treatment of spinal fractures in patients with ankylosed spine. J Clin Neurosci 2016;30:8892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, ML, Tsai, TT, Lai, PL, et al. A retrospective study of treating thoracolumbar spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24 Suppl 1:S117S123. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1375-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats