Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-g6grg Total loading time: 0.779 Render date: 2022-01-17T08:42:57.170Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Section 2 - Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

Zoran Rumboldt
Medical University of South Carolina
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
A Case-Based Approach
, pp. 21 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:9499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, KL, et al. The Canadian C-sine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286:18411848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchow, RD, Resnick, DK, Abdel, MP, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2008;64:179189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozzo, A, Marcoux, J, Radhakrishna, M, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:14011411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, LE, West, OC. Thoracolumbar spine trauma. In Imaging skeletal trauma, 4th edition, Philadelphia: Saunders, 2014, pp. 90127.Google Scholar
Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, Todd, KH, Zucker, MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:9499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286:18411848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, PA, Muchow, RD, Munoz, A, Tontz, WL, Resnick, DK. Clearance of the asymptomatic cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:100106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nigrovic, LE, Rogers, AJ, Adelgais, KM, et al. Utility of plain radiographs in detecting traumatic injuries of the cervical spine in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:426432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, JA, Chupik, C, Swischuk, LE. Cervical spine trauma in children under 5 years: productivity of CT. Emerg Radiol 2004;10:176178.Google ScholarPubMed
Pearce, MS, Salotti, JA, Little, MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:499505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulkens, TH, Marchal, P, Daineffe, S, et al. Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. AJNR 2007;28:14441450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becce, F, Ben Salah, Y, Verdun, FR, et al. Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol 2013;42:937945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stradiotti, P, Curti, A, Castellazzi, G, Zerbi, A. Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J 2009;18 Suppl 1:102108. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0998-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueck, FG, Roesch, S, Geyer, L, et al. Emergency CT head and neck imaging: effects of swimmer’s position on dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 2014;24:969979. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3105-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daffner, RH, Sciulli, RL, Rodriguez, A, Protetch, J. Imaging for evaluation of suspected cervical spine trauma: a 2-year analysis. Injury 2006;37:652658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komlosi, P, Grady, D, Smith, JS, et al. Evaluation of monoenergetic imaging to reduce metallic instrumentation artifacts in computed tomography of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;22:3438. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavros, MN, Kaafarani, HM, Mejaddam, AY, et al. Additional imaging in alert trauma patients with cervical spine tenderness and a negative computed tomographic scan: is it needed? World J Surg 2015;39:26852690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badhiwala, JH, Lai, CK, Alhazzani, W, et al. Cervical spine clearance in obtunded patients after blunt traumatic injury: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:429437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, MB, Humble, SS, Cullinane, DC, et al. Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78:430441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, IA, Moukalled, A, Yu, E, et al. A systematic review of the need for MRI for the clearance of cervical spine injury in obtunded blunt trauma patients after normal cervical spine CT. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2014;7:251255.Google ScholarPubMed
Satahoo, SS, Davis, JS, Garcia, GD, et al. Sticking our neck out: is magnetic resonance imaging needed to clear an obtunded patient’s cervical spine? J Surg Res 2014;187:225229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, BG, Swartz, C, Quigley, MR, et al. Cervical spine clearance in the traumatically injured patient: is multidetector CT scanning sufficient alone? Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:576581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackland, HM, Cameron, PA, Wolfe, R, et al. Outcomes at 12 months after early magnetic resonance imaging in acute trauma patients with persistent midline cervical tenderness and negative computed tomography. Spine 2013;38:10681081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khanna, P, Chau, C, Dublin, A, et al. The value of cervical magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the obtunded or comatose patient with cervical trauma, no other abnormal neurological findings, and a normal cervical computed tomography. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:699702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panczykowski, DM, Tomycz, ND, Okonkwo, DO. Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: meta-analysis of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma. J Neurosurg 2011;115:541549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denis, F. The three columns spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983;8:817831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, GD, Harrop, JS, Vaccaro, AR. Thoracolumbar trauma classification. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2017;28:2329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, AT, Bransford, RJ, Lee, MJ, et al. Reliability of classification systems for subaxial cervical injuries. Evid Based Spine Care J 2010;1:1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gwendolen, J, Kenardy, J, Hendrikz, J, et al. Management of acute whiplash: a randomized controlled trial of multidisciplinary stratified treatments. J Pain 2014;154:17981806.Google Scholar
Lamb, SE, Gates, S, Williams, MA, et al. Emergency department treatments and physiotherapy for acute whiplash: a pragmatic, two-step, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2013;381:546556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, A, Forget, M, St George, K, et al. Patient education for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;3:CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub4.Google Scholar
Carroll, LJ, Holm, LW, Hogg-Johnson, S, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33(4 Suppl): S83S92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiell, IG, Clement, CM, McKnight, RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:25102518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, MD, Croft, AC, Rossignol, AM. “Whiplash associated disorders: redefining whiplash and its management” by the Quebec Task Force. A critical evaluation. Spine 1998;23:10431049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Q, Shen, H, Li, M. Magnetic resonance imaging signal changes of alar and transverse ligaments not correlated with whiplash-associated disorders: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, SE, Boesch, C, Zimmermann, H, et al. Are there cervical spine findings at MR imaging that are specific to acute symptomatic whiplash injury? A prospective controlled study with four experienced blinded readers. Radiology 2012;262:567575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetti, N, Kråkenes, J, Ask, T, et al. Follow-up MR imaging of the alar and transverse ligaments after whiplash injury: a prospective controlled study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:18361841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dullerud, R, Gjertsen, O, Server, A. Magnetic resonance imaging of ligaments and membranes in the craniocervical junction in whiplash-associated injury and in healthy control subjects. Acta Radiol 2010;51:207212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalilzadeh, O, Rahimian, M, Batchu, V, et al. Effectiveness of second-opinion radiology consultations to reassess the cervical spine CT scans: a study on trauma patients referred to a tertiary-care hospital. Diagn Interv Radiol 2015;21:423427. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.15003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartalena, T, Giannelli, G, Rinaldi, MF, et al. Prevalence of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures on multidetector CT: underreporting by radiologists. Eur J Radiol 2009;69:555559. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinckman, MA, Chau, C, Ross, JS. Marrow edema variability in acute spine fractures. Spine J 2015;15:454460. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haris, AM, Vasu, C, Kanthila, M, et al. Assessment of MRI as a modality for evaluation of soft tissue injuries of the spine as compared to intraoperative assessment. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:TC01TC05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17427.7377.Google ScholarPubMed
Goradia, D, Linnau, KF, Cohen, WA, et al. Correlation of MR imaging findings with intraoperative findings after cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:209215.Google ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats