Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-x5mqb Total loading time: 0.282 Render date: 2021-11-30T16:15:45.622Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - Climate for business: from threat to opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Peter Newell
University of East Anglia
Matthew Paterson
University of Ottawa
Get access


It may seem hard to believe today, but there was once a time that business denied there was such a thing as climate change. Vast amounts of money and effort went into discrediting the scientific basis on which the case for action was made. Business lobby organisations were set up and funded by those companies that felt threatened by action on climate change. Aggressive lobbying which aimed to derail national and international responses to the issue was commonplace on Capitol Hill in Washington or at UN climate negotiations.

From the mid 1990s onwards, however, a fascinating transformation took place. Though a handful of companies continue vociferously to resist tougher forms of action, many started to sense that regulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) was on its way, and that they were better off preparing themselves to compete and survive in this new business environment. Some then learned what a smaller number of companies had already worked out – that beyond just being a question of risk management, there were in fact many good business opportunities in a carbon-constrained economy. There was a strong ‘business case’ for action on climate change. The US Climate Action Partnership, for example, an organisation that is ‘committed to a pathway that will slow, stop and reverse the growth of US emissions while expanding the US economy’ includes among its members companies like Alcoa, British Petroleum, Ford, General Electric and Shell, all of which were previously among the ranks of the industry lobbies resisting calls for action.

Climate Capitalism
Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy
, pp. 36 - 59
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Adam, D., ‘ExxonMobil continuing to fund climate skeptic groups, records show’, The Guardian, 1 July 2009Google Scholar
Quoted in Newell, P., Climate for Change: Non-State Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sample, I., ‘Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study’, The Guardian, 2 February 2007Google Scholar
Lomberg, B., ‘Climate change can wait. World health can't’, The Observer, 2 July 2006Google Scholar
Macalister, T., ‘BP and Shell warned to halt campaign against Obama's climate change bill’, The Guardian, 20 August 2009Google Scholar
McAlister, T., ‘BP shuts alternative energy HQ’, The Guardian, 29 June 2009
Webb, T., ‘Shell dumps wind, solar and hydro power in favour of biofuels,’ The Guardian, 17 March 2009Google Scholar
Levy, D. and Newell, P., ‘Oceans apart? Comparing business responses to the environment in Europe and North America’, Environment, 42(9) (2000)Google Scholar
Rowlands, I. H., ‘Beauty and the Beast?: BP's and Exxon's Positions on Global Climate Change’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18 (2008), 39–54Google Scholar
Newell, P., ‘Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change’, Global Environmental Politics, 8(3) (2008), 124–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., ‘Exxon facing shareholder revolt over approach to climate change’, The Guardian, 19 May 2008Google Scholar
Schmidheiny, S., Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Rowlands, I. H., The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Driessen, P., ‘BP – Back to Petroleum’, Review – Institute of Public Affairs, 55(1)(2003), 13–14Google Scholar
Stern, N., The Economics of Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, F., The Condition of the English Working Class (London: Penguin, 1987).Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats