Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion
Buy print or eBook
[Opens in a new window] <I>On the Nature of the Gods and On Divination</I>
Book contents
- Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion
- Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Cicero and the Translation of Philosophy from Greece to Rome
- Chapter 1 Cicero’s Project in On the Nature of the Gods and On Divination
- Chapter 2 Velleius the Epicurean
- Chapter 3 Balbus the Stoic and Cotta the Skeptic
- Chapter 4 Quintus’ Stoic Case for Divination
- Chapter 5 Marcus’ Arguments against Divination
- Chapter 6 Marcus’ Stance on the Central Question
- Book part
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum antiquorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2019
Book contents
- Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion
- Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Cicero and the Translation of Philosophy from Greece to Rome
- Chapter 1 Cicero’s Project in On the Nature of the Gods and On Divination
- Chapter 2 Velleius the Epicurean
- Chapter 3 Balbus the Stoic and Cotta the Skeptic
- Chapter 4 Quintus’ Stoic Case for Divination
- Chapter 5 Marcus’ Arguments against Divination
- Chapter 6 Marcus’ Stance on the Central Question
- Book part
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum antiquorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion<I>On the Nature of the Gods and On Divination</I>, pp. 284 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Algra, K. (2003) ‘Stoic Theology’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 153–178.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2007) Conceptions and Images: Hellenistic Philosophical Theology and Traditional Religion. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2009) ‘Stoic Philosophical Theology and Greco-Roman Religion’, in Salles (ed.) (2009a): 224–252.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. (2001) Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2005) ‘The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology’, in Inwood and Frede: 14–35.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2008) The Matter of the Gods: Religion and the Roman Empire. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 44. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.) (2016) Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Annus, A. (ed.) (2010) Divination and Interpretation of Signs in the Ancient World. Oriental Institute Seminars 6. Chicago.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and the Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. (1997) ‘L’ordre du deuxième livre du De Natura Deorum de Cicéro’, Revue d’Histoire des Textes 27: 87–108.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. (1999) ‘Existence et providence des Dieux dans la théologie stoïcienne: remarques sur l’ordre de l’exposé du De natura deorum (livre 2) d’après la traduction manuscrite’, Études Philosophiques 1999.1: 91–104.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (1933) M. Tullius Cicero: De Natura Deorum. Scripta Quae Manserunt Omnia 45. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982) ‘Medicine, Experience and Logic’, in Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice, ed. Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M., and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 24–68.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1986) ‘Cicero and Divination: The Formation of a Latin Discourse’, JRS 76: 33–46.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1990) ‘Priesthood in the Roman Republic’, in Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, ed. Beard, M. and North, J.. London.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2009) ‘How Industrious Can Zeus Be? The Extent and Objects of Divine Activity in Stoicism’, in Salles (ed.), 23–45.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2011) ‘Beauty and its Relation to Goodness in Stoicism’, in Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, ed. Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D.. Cambridge: 130–152.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1936) ‘Les méthodes de l’histoire littéraire: Cicéron et son oeuvre philosophique’, Revue des Études Latines 14.2: 288–309.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1970) Études sur l’humanisme cicéronien. Collection Latomus 121. Brussels.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1998) ‘Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City’, CQ 48.1: 168–174.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2003a) ‘The Stoics’ Two Types of Allegory’, in Metaphor, Allegory and the Classical Tradition, ed. Boys-Stones, G.. Oxford: 189–216.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2003b) Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2009) ‘Ancient Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction’, in Oppy and Trakakis (eds.): 1–22.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (1998) ‘The Old Stoic Theory of the Emotions’, in Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.) The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, The New Synthese Historical Library (Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy) 45. Dordrecht: 21–70.Google Scholar
Briggs, W. and Calder, W. (eds.) (1990) Classical Scholarship: A Biographical Encyclopedia. New York.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2005) ‘Common Sense: Concepts, Definition and Meaning In and Out of the Stoa’, in Inwood and Frede (eds.): 164–209.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2016) ‘Cicero’s Sceptical Methods: The Example of the De Finibus’, in Annas and Betegh (eds.): 12–40.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2014) The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. (1989) ‘Philosophy and Religion in the Late Republic’, in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, ed. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 174–198.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1982) ‘Gods and Heaps’, in Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy presented to Owen, G. E. L., ed. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M.. Cambridge: 315–338.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. (1989) ‘The Eleusinian Mysteries: Roman Initiates and Benefactors, Second Century B.C. to A.D. 267’, ANRW 2.18.2: 1499–1539.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1941) ‘Les sorites de Carnéade contre le polythéisme’, Revue des Études Grecques 54: 43–57.Google Scholar
DeFilippo, J. (2000) ‘Cicero vs. Cotta in De natura deorum’, Ancient Philosophy 20.1: 169–187.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (1985) ‘The Case Against Divination: An Examination of Cicero’s De Divinatione’, PCPS 211 n. s. 31: 1–10.Google Scholar
Dougan, T. (1905) M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum Disputationum Libri Quinque: Volume I: Books I and II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. (1965) ‘Cicero the Philosopher’, in Cicero, ed. Dorey, T.. London: 135–170.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. (1995) ‘Form and Content in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Powell (ed.): 197–218.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, M. (1973) ‘Posidonius’ “Hierarchy” Between God, Fate and Nature, and Cicero’s De divinatione’, Filosofia 4: 286–305.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, M. (1976) The Stoic Arguments for the Existence and Providence of the Gods. Athens.Google Scholar
Drummond, W., and Walpole, R. (1810) Herculanensia; or Archaeological and Philological Dissertations, containing a Manuscript Found among the Ruins of Herculaneum. London.Google Scholar
Durand, R. (1903) ‘La date du “De Divinatione”’, in Mélanges Boissier: recueil de mémoires concernant la littérature et les antiquités romaines dédié à Gaston Boissier: à l’occasion de son 80e anniversaire. Paris: 173–183.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2002) ‘Epicurus as deus mortalis: homoiosis theoi and Epicurean Self-cultivation’, in Frede and Laks (eds.): 159–181.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2011) ‘Cicero’s Use and Abuse of Epicurean Theology’, in Fish and Sanders (eds.): 129–151.Google Scholar
Falconer, W. (1923) ‘A Review of M. Durand’s La date du De Divinatione’, CP 18.4: 310–327.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fish, J. and Sanders, K. (eds.) (2011) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds.) (1989) Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 4. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. and Pender, E. (eds.) (2009) Heraclides of Pontus: Discussion. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 15. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2009) ‘Heraclides of Pontus and the Philosophical Dialogue’, in Fortenbaugh and Pender (eds.): 41–68.Google Scholar
Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) (2002) Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, its Background and Aftermath. Leiden.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1986) ‘The Stoic Doctrine of the Affections of the Soul’, in Schofield, M., and Striker, G., (eds.) The Norms of Nature. Cambridge: 93–110.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994) ‘The Stoic Conception of Reason’, in Hellenistic Philosophy vol. 2, ed. Boudouris, K.. Athens: 50–63.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1989) ‘Aristotelian Material in Cicero’s De natura deorum’, in Fortenbaugh and Steinmetz (eds): 201–219.Google Scholar
Gercke, A. (1885) ‘Chrysippea’, Jahrbücher für Classische Philologie suppl. 14: 689–781.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society supplemental volume 30. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013) ‘Of Cicero’s Plato: Fictions, Forms, Foundations’, in Schofield (ed.): 225–275.Google Scholar
Giomini, R. (1975) M. Tullius Cicero: De Divinatione, de Fato, Timaeus. Scripta Quae Manserunt Omnia 46. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Giomini, R. (1971) Problemi cronologici e compositivi del “De divinatione” Ciceroniano. Rome.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Cicero’s Philosophical Affiliations’, in Dillon and Long (eds.): 34–69.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1992) ‘Cicero’s Philosophical Affiliations Again’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 17: 134–138.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) ‘Probabile, veri simile and Related Terms’, in Powell (ed.): 115–143.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (2004) ‘The Philonian/Metrodorians: Problems of Method in Ancient Philosophy’, Elenchos 25: 99–152.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1995) ‘Silencing the Troublemaker: De Legibus 1.39 and the Continuity of Cicero’s Scepticism’, in Powell (ed.): 85–113.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1997) ‘Cicero’s Philosophical Stance in the Lucullus,’ in Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium Hellenisticum, ed. B. Inwood and J. Mansfeld: 36–57.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. (1987) ‘Aristotelian Philosophers in the Roman World’, ANRW 2.36.2: 1079–1174.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2016) ‘Honor and the Honorable: Cato’s Discourse in De Finibus 3’, in Annas and Betegh (eds.): 118–146.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1995) ‘Philosophical Badinage in Cicero’s Letters to his Friends’, in Powell (ed.): 325–346.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1997) ‘From Aristotle to Atticus: Cicero and Matius on Friendship’, in Barnes and Griffin (eds.): 86–109.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, F. (2006) Le De divinatione de Cicéron et les théories antiques de la divination. Collection Latomus 298. Brussels.Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. (1993) ‘Das Kriterium der Prolepsis beim Epikureer Diogenian’, Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 36: 24–32.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. (1988) ‘Stoicism, Science and Divination’, in Method, Medicine and Metaphysics: Studies in the Philosophy of Ancient Science, ed. Hankinson, R.. Apeiron 21.2. Edmonton: 123–160.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Georgius (ed.) (1893) Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora vol. 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1877–1883) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Philosophischen Schriften. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Frede, D. (eds.) (2005) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. (2008) The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonies. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (2010) ‘Traces of the Omen Series Šumma Izbu in Cicero, De divinatione’, in Annus (ed.): 317–339.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2003) ‘The Stoics and the Astronomical Sciences’, in Inwood (ed.): 328–344.Google Scholar
Keaney, J. and Lamberton, R. (1996) [Plutarch]: Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer. APA American Classical Studies 40. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. (1982) ‘Books and Readers in the Roman world’, in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature vol. 2, ed. Kenney, E. and Clausen, W. (eds.). Cambridge: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (2016) ‘Epicurus’, in Zalta, E., (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2016 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/epicurus/Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2000) ‘Beyond (Dis)belief: Rhetorical Form and Religious Symbol in Cicero’s de Divinatione’, TAPA 130: 353–391.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. (1874) M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum disputationum libri quinque, 5th edn. Hanover.Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. (1973) ‘Arkhai and stoikheia: A Problem in Stoic Cosmology’, Phronesis 18.2: 240–278.Google Scholar
Levine, P. (1957) ‘The Original Design and Publication of the De Natura Deorum’, HSCP 62: 7–36.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero Academicus: Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie Cicéronienne. Collection de l’École française de Rome 162. Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1997) ‘De Chrysippe à Posidonius: Variations Stoïciennes sur le thème de la divination’, in Oracles et prophéties dans l’antiquité, ed. Heintz, J.. Travaux du Centre de Recherche sur le Proche-Orient et la Grèce Antique, Université des Sciences Humaines de Strasbourg 15. Paris: 321–43.Google Scholar
Lévy, Carlos (2010) ‘The Sceptical Academy: Decline and Afterlife’, in Bett (ed.): 81–104.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1972) ‘The Aedileship of Favonius, Curio the Younger and Cicero’s Election to the Augurate,’ HSCP 76: 181–200.Google Scholar
Long, A. (2005) ‘Stoic Linguistics, Plato’s Cratylus, and Augustine De dialectica’, in Inwood and Frede (eds.): 36–55.Google Scholar
Malcovati, H. (1953) Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae, 3rd edn. 2 vols. Turin.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1979) ‘Providence and the Destruction of the Universe in Early Stoic Thought: With Some Remarks on the “Mysteries of Philosophy”’, in Studies in Hellenistic Religions, ed. Vermaseren, M.. Leiden: 129–188.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. (1996–2010) Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. 3 vols. Philosophia Antiqua 73, 114, and 118. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. B. (1880–1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum Libri Tres. 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (1996) ‘Epicurean Doxography in Cicero, De natura deorum, Book 1’, in Epicureismo greco e romano vol. 2, ed. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Naples: 865–878.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2015) The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, trans. Lloyd, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1984) ‘The Theological Efforts of the Roman Upper Classes in the First Century BC’, CPh 79.3: 199–211.Google Scholar
Mora, F. (2003) ‘“Irrazionalismo” nazionalistico nel pensiero teologico di Cicerone’, Bollettino di Studi Latini 23: 3–26.Google Scholar
Most, G. (1989) ‘Cornutus and Stoic Allegoresis: A Preliminary Report’, ANRW 2.36.3: 2014–2065.Google Scholar
Mras, K. (1954) Eusebius Werke: 8. Band, Die Praeparatio Evangelica, vol. 1. Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller der Ersten Jahrhunderte 43. Berlin.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. (1998) ‘Cicero’s First Readers: Epistolary Evidence for the Dissemination of his Works’, CQ 48.2: 492–505.Google Scholar
North, J. (2014) ‘The Limits of the “Religious” in the Late Roman Republic’, History of Religions 53.3: 225–245.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1995) ‘Eros and the Wise: The Stoic Response to a Cultural Dilemma’, OSAP 13: 231–267.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1992) ‘What All Men Believe – Must Be True: Common Conceptions and consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic Philosophy’, OSAP 10: 193–231.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1999) ‘The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City’, in Ierodiakonou (ed.): 178–195.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2002) ‘“All Gods are True” in Epicurus’, in Frede and Laks (eds.): 183–221.Google Scholar
Oppy, G. and Trakakis, N. (eds.) (2009) The History of Western Philosophy of Religion vol. 1. Durham.Google Scholar
Pease, A. (ed.) (1920–1923) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Divinatione. University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 6.2 and 8.2. Urbana.Google Scholar
Pease, A. (1955–1958) Cicero: De Natura Deorum: Bimillennial Edition. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Penelhum, T. (1983) God and Skepticism : A Study in Skepticism and Fideism. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy 28. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Poncelet, R. (1957) Cicéron: Traducteur de Platon: L’expression de la pensée complexe en latin classique. Paris.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. (1999) ‘Epicurus on “Free Volition” and the Atomic Swerve’, Phronesis 44.4: 253–299.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (1942) Cicero: De Oratore, De Fato, Paradoxa Stoicorum, De Oratoria, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S. (2000) ‘Cicero’s Stand on Prodigies: A Non-Existent Dilemma?’, in Divination and Portents in the Roman World, ed. Wildfang, R. and Isager, J.. Odense University Classical Studies 21. Odense: 9–24.Google Scholar
Repici, L. (1995) ‘Gli Stoici e la Divinazione secondo Cicerone’, Hermes 123.2: 175–192.Google Scholar
Rossbach, O. (1910) T. Livi: Periochae, Omnium Librorum Fragmenta, Oxyrhynchi Reperta, Iulii Obsequentis Prodigiorum Liber. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2014) ‘Historicizing Religion: Varro’s Antiquitates and History of Religion in the Late Roman Republic’, History of Religions 53.3: 246–268.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. and Hunger, H. (1988–2001) Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia. 7 vols. Vienna.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (2005) ‘Ἐκπύρωσις and the Goodness of God in Cleanthes’, Phronesis, 50.1, 56–78.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (2009b) ‘Chrysippus on Conflagration and the Indestructibility of the Cosmos’, in Salles (ed.): 118–134.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2011) ‘Law and Divination in the Late Roman Republic’, in Tellegen-Couperus (ed.): 31–54.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2013) Divination, Prediction and the End of the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (1987) ‘Polytheism Impossible; or, the Empty Gods: Reasons behind the Void in the History of Roman Religion’, in The Inconceivable Polytheism: Studies in Religious Historiography, ed. F. Schmidt. History and Anthropology 3: 303–326.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (1987–1989) ‘La parole des dieux. L’originalité du dialogue des Romains avec leurs dieux’, Opus 6–7: 125–136.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (1990) Romulus et ses frères: le Collège des Frères Arvales, modèle du culte public dans la Rome des empereurs. Paris.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (2005) Quand faire, c’est croire. Les rites sacrificiels des Romains. Paris.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1980) ‘Preconception, Argument and God’, in Schofield, Burnyeat, and Barnes (eds.): 283–308.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) ‘Academic Epistemology’, in K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield, (eds.): 323–351.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2002) ‘Academic Therapy: Philo of Larissa and Cicero’s Project in the Tusculans’, in Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin, ed. Clark, G. and Rajak, T.. Oxford: 91–109.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm (2008) ‘Ciceronian Dialogue’, in The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, ed. Goldhill, S.. Oxford: 63–84.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm (ed.) (2013) Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC: New Directions for Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M., and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1980) Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schultz, C. (2014). Commentary on Cicero, De Divinatione I. Michigan Classical Commentaries 3. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (1988) ‘Platonic Elements in the Structure of Cicero de Oratore Book 1’, Rhetorica 6: 237–258.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E., Stork, P., Van Ophuijsen, J., and Prince, S. (2008) Heraclides of Pontus: Texts and Translations. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 14. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2011) ‘Epicurus’ Theological Innatism’, in Fish and Sanders (eds.): 29–52.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. (2002) Cicero: Letters to Quintus and Brutus; Letter Fragments; Letter to Octavian; Invectives; Handbook of Electioneering, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. (1991) Cicero: On Fate and Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy IV.5–7, V. Warminster.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1995) ‘“A Self-Indulgent Misuse of Leisure and Writing”? How Not to Write Philosophy: Did Cicero Get it Right?’, in Powell (ed.): 301–323.Google Scholar
Starr, R. (1987) ‘The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World’, CQ 37.1: 213–223.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2005) Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1989) ‘Beobachtungen zu Ciceros philosophischem Standpunkt’, in Fortenbaugh and Steinmetz: 1–22.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996d) ‘On the Difference between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics’, in Striker (ed.): 135–149.Google Scholar
Süss, W. (1965) Cicero: Eine Einführung in seine philosophischen Schriften (mit Ausschluß der staatsphilosophischen Werke). Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse 5: 213–385. Mainz.Google Scholar
Taran, L. (1987) ‘Cicero’s Attitude Towards Stoicism and Scepticism in the De Natura Deorum’, in Florilegium Columbianum: Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Selig, K. and Somerville, R.. New York: 1–22.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2000) ‘Recollection and Prophecy in the De Divinatione’, Phronesis 45.1: 64–76.Google Scholar
Tarver, T. (1997) ‘Varro and the Antiquarianism of Philosophy’, in Philosophia Togata I, eds. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M., Oxford, 130–164.Google Scholar
Tellegen-Couperus, O. (ed.) (2011) Law and Religion in the Roman Republic. Mnemosyne Supplements: History and Archaeology of Antiquity 336. Leiden.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1994) ‘Alcuni fraintendimenti nel De Divinatione’, in Nuovi contributi di filologia e storia della lingua latina. Bologna: 241–264.Google Scholar
Thesaurus linguae latinae (1900–) Leipzig.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (2007) Terentia, Tullia and Publilia: The Women of Cicero’s Family. Women of the Ancient World. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, P. (2010) ‘Varro’s Divine Antiquities: Roman Religion as an Image of Truth’, CP 105.2: 162–188.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2008) Law, Reason and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. and Frede, M. (1984) Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
White, G. (2015) “Copia verborum: Cicero’s Philosophical Translations.” Diss. Princeton. ProQuest order no. 3737410.Google Scholar
Wissowa, G., Kroll, W., and Mittelhaus, K. (eds.), (1893–1980) Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. (2012) ‘God’s Indifferents: Why Cicero’s Stoic Jupiter Made the World’, Apeiron 45: 354–383.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. (2015) ‘Learned and Wise: Cotta the Sceptic in Cicero’s De Natura Deorum’, OSAP 47: 245–274.Google Scholar
Zoll, G. (1962) Cicero Platonis Aemulus: Untersuchung über die Form von Ciceros Dialogen, besonders von De Oratore. Zürich.Google Scholar