Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:28:35.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ben Ambridge
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Elena V. M. Lieven
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Child Language Acquisition
Contrasting Theoretical Approaches
, pp. 387 - 426
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2001). What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development, 16(2): 679–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2004). Training 2;6-year-olds to produce the transitive construction: the role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution. Developmental Science, 7(1): 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2008). Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions. Cognitive Development, 23(1): 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguado-Orea, J. J. (2004). The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish: implications for current theories of development. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26: 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akhtar, N. and Montague, L. (1999). Early lexical acquisition: the role of cross-situational learning. First Language, 19: 347–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, N. and Tomasello, M. (1996). Two-year-olds learn words for absent objects and actions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, N. and Tomasello, M. (1997). Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33(6): 952–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akhtar, N. and Tomasello, M. (2000). The social nature of words and word learning. In Golinkoff, R. (ed.), Becoming a Word Learner: A Debate on Lexical Acquisition (pp. 115–30). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, N., Carpenter, M. and Tomasello, M. (1996). The role of discourse novelty in early word learning. Child Development, 67(2): 635–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, A. and Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90: 119–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldridge, M. (1989). The Acquisition of INFL. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alegre, M. and Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1): 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alishahi, A. and Stevenson, S. (2008). A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science, 32(5): 789–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S. E. and Crago, M. B. (1996). Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child Language, 23(1): 129–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, B. (2007). Tapping into children's knowledge: The Totally Abstract Production Priming paradigm. Unpublished MS.
Ambridge, B. (2009a). ‘Retreat’ from argument-structure overgeneralization errors as a consequence of the acquisition of verb and construction semantics. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, April 2009, Denver, CO, USA.
Ambridge, B. (2009b). Review of Hirsh-Pasek, K. and Golinkoff, R. M. (2005). Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs. Infant and Child Development, 18: 99–101.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B. (in press). Children's judgments of regular and irregular novel past tense forms: new data on the English past-tense debate. Developmental Psychology.
Ambridge, B. and Goldberg, A. E. (2008). The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3): 349–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B. and Pine, J. M. (2006). Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model using an elicited imitation paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 33(4): 879–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, B. and Rowland, C. F. (2009). Predicting children's errors with negative questions: testing a schema-combination account. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(2): 225–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., Mills, R., Clark, V. and Rowland, C. F. (2009). Un-learning un-prefixation errors. Paper presented at the International Conference on Cognitive Modelling 2009, Manchester, UK.
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M. and Rowland, C. F. (in press). Children use verb semantics to retreat from overgeneralization errors: a novel verb grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Linguistics.
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F. and Clark, V. (2010a). Verb semantics and the retreat from overgeneralization errors. Unpublished MS.
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F. and Clark, V. (2010b). Restricting dative argument-structure overgeneralizations: a grammaticality-judgment study with adults and children. Unpublished MS.
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F. and Young, C. R. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106(1): 87–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Jones, R. L. and Clark, V. (2009). A semantics-based approach to the ‘No negative evidence’ problem. Cognitive Science, 33(7): 1301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F. and Pine, J. M. (2008). Is structure dependence an innate constraint? New experimental evidence from children's complex question production. Cognitive Science, 32(1): 222–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. L. and Tomasello, M. (2006). Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’Journal of Child Language, 33(3): 519–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M. and Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children's acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development, 21(2): 174–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I. (2010). Rethinking child difficulty: the effect of NP type on children's processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 37(1): 27–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aslin, R. N. and Newport, E. L. (2009). What statistical learning can and can't tell us about language acquisition. In Colombo, J., McCardle, P. and Freund, L. (eds.), Infant Pathways to Language: Methods, Models and Research Disorders (pp. 169–94). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N. and Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. Child Phonology, 2: 67–96.Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Pisoni, D. B., Hennessy, B. L. and Perey, A. V. (1981). Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effect of early experience. Child Development, 52: 1135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R. and Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9: 321–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Werker, J. F. and Morgan, J. L. (2002). Innate phonetic boundaries revisited (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112: 1257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, T. K. F., Dapretto, M. and Song, Y. K. (1994). Input vs constraints – early word acquisition in Korean and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5): 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Enquiry, 10: 533–81.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (2001). The Atoms of Language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Balaban, M. T. and Waxman, S. R. (1997). Do words facilitate object categorization in 9-month-old infants?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62(5): 875–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. A. (1992). Clarifying the role of shape in children's taxonomic assumption. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54(3): 392–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. A. (1993a). Early referential understanding – infants ability to recognize referential acts for what they are. Developmental Psychology, 29(5): 832–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (1993b). Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language, 20(2): 395–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., Bill, B., Desjardins, R. N., Irwin, J. M. and Tidball, G. (1996). Infants' reliance on a social criterion for establishing word–object relations. Child Development, 67(6): 3135–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banks, M. S., Aslin, R. N. and Letson, R. D. (1975). Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision. Science, 190: 675–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannard, C. and Lieven, E. (2009). Repetition and reuse in child language learning. In Corrigan, R., Moravcsik, E., Ouali, H. and Wheatley, K. (eds.), Formulaic language, vol. 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, Functional Explanations (pp. 299–318). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bannard, C. and Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19: 241–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannard, C., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2009). Modelling children's early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(41): 17284–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Baldwin, D. A. and Crowson, M. (1997). Do children with autism use the speaker's direction of gaze strategy to crack the code of language?Child Development, 68(1): 48–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, D. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4): 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. (1993). Modularity, Domain Specificity and the Development of Language. Technical Report 9305. Center for Research in Language, UCSD. [AEG]
Bates, E. (1994). Modularity, domain specificity and the development of language. Discussions in Neuroscience, 10(1/2): 136–49.Google Scholar
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1979). A functionalist approach to the acquisition of grammar. In Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics (pp. 167–209). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. and Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 21: 205–24.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, , D'Amico, A., S. (1999). Processing complex sentences: a cross-linguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(1): 69–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F. and Venza, V. (1984). A crosslinguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55: 341–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavin, E. L. and Growcott, C. (2000). Infants of 24–30 months understand verb frames. In Perkins, S. and Howard, S. (eds.), New Directions in Language Development and Disorders (pp. 169–77). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and Non-Stress Accent (Netherlands Phonetic Archives no. 7). Dordrecht: Foris. (Second printing, 1992, by Walter de Gruyter.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behne, T., Carpenter, M., Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (2005). Unwilling versus unable: infants' understanding of intentional action. Developmental Psychology, 41(2): 328–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behne, T., Carpenter, M. and Tomasello, M. (2005). One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Developmental Science, 8: 492–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrend, D. A. (1990). The development of verb concepts: children's use of verbs to label familiar and novel events. Child Development, 61(3): 681–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellagamba, F. and Tomasello, M. (1999). Re-enacting intended acts: comparing 12- and 18-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 22(2): 277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencini, G. M. L. and Valian, V. V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in 3 year-olds: evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., Pinker, S. and Shimron, J. (1999). Default nominal inflection in Hebrew: evidence for mental variables. Cognition, 72(1): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14: 150–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. and Sagi, I. (1981). On word formation and word innovations in early age. Balshanut Ivrit Xofshit 18.Google Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1984). Patterns of vowel modification in mother–child speech. Journal of Child Language, 11(3): 557–78.Google Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1996). From ‘signal to syntax’: but what is the nature of the signal? In Morgan, J. L. and Demuth, K. (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping From Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 135–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. and Weinberg, A. (1984). The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W. and Sithole, N. N. (1988). The phonological basis of perceptual loss for non-native contrasts: maintenance of discrimination among Zulu clicks by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14: 345–60.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. and Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 161–81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2000). Pragmatic language impairment: a correlate of SLI, a distinct subgroup, or part of the autistic continuum? In Bishop, D. V. M and Leonard, L. B (eds.), Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome (pp. 99–113). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2009). Genes, cognition and communication: insights from neurodevelopmental disorders. The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156: 1–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. V. M. and Leonard, L. B. (eds.). (2000). Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., Adams, C. V. and Norbury, C. F. (2006). Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5: 158–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One Word at a Time: the Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Rispoli, M., Gartner, B. and Hafitz, J. (1989). Acquisition of complementation. Journal of Child Language, 16(1): 101–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L., Tinker, E. and Margulis, C. (1993). The words children learn – evidence against a noun bias in early vocabularies. Cognitive Development, 8(4): 431–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Enquiry, 21: 491–504.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meaning of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2004). Myths of word learning. In Hall, D. G and Waxman, S. R (eds.), Weaving a Lexicon (pp. 205–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. and Markson, L. (2001). Are there principles that apply only to the acquisition of words? A reply to Waxman and Booth. Cognition, 78: 89–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18: 355–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bod, R. (2009). From exemplar to grammar: a probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science, 33: 752–93.
Bol, G. W. (1995). Implicational scaling in child language acquisition: the order of production of Dutch verb constructions. In Verrips, M. and Wijnen, F. (eds.), Papers from the Dutch-German Colloquium on Language Acquisition. Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development, 3. Amsterdam: Institute for General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Booth, A. E. and Waxman, S. R. (2002). Word learning is ‘smart’: evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers' extension of novel words. Cognition, 84(1): B11–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borer, H. and Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E. (eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 123–72). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. and Wexler, K. (1992). Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10(2): 147–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. (1987). Perceptual categories in vision and audition. In Harnad, S. (ed.), Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition (pp. 287–300). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bortfeld, H., Morgan, J. L., Golinkoff, R. M. and Rathbun, K. (2005). Mommy and me – familiar names help launch babies into speech-stream segmentation. Psychological Science, 16: 298–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boser, C., Lust, B., Santelmann, L. and Whitman, J. (1992). The syntax of CP and V2 in early child German (ECG): the strong continuity hypothesis. NELS 22: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 51–66). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-linguistic Study with Special Reference to Finnish. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1985). What shapes children's grammars? In Slobin, D. I (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 2: Theoretical Issues (pp. 1257–1319). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1988). The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: how do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining Language Universals (pp. 73–101). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1990). Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics, 28: 1251–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M. and Croft, W. (2007). The acquisition of the English causative alternation. In Bowerman, M. and Brown, P. (eds.), Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. K. and Goldberg, A. E. (in press). Learning what not to say: the role of categorization and statistical pre-emption in the production of a-adjectives. Language.
Boysson-Bardies, B. and Vihman, M. (1991). Adaptation to language: evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language, 67(2): 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B., Vihman, M. M., Roug-Hellichius, L., Durand, C., Landberg, I. and Arao, F. (1992). Material evidence of infant selection from the target language: a cross-linguistic study. In Ferguson, C., Menn, L. and Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds.), Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure. Language, 39: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1971). On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Ontogenesis of Grammar (pp. 153–86). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41(164): 1–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D.S. (1987). What is learned in acquiring word classes: a step toward an acquisition theory. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 67–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D.S. (1992). What sort of innate structure is needed to ‘bootstrap’ into syntax? Cognition, 45(1): 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. and Brooks, P. J. (1995). Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In Tomasello, M. and Merriman, W. E. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs (pp. 352–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S., Brody, R. E., Brooks, P. J., Sudhalter, V., Ross, J. A., Catalano, L.et al. (1990). Exploring language-acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language – effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses and correction. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(5): 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S., Brody, R. E., Fisch, S. M., Weisberger, M. J. and Blum, M. (1990). Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure. Journal of Child Language, 17(2): 313–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, S., Kidd, E., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2009). The discourse bases of relativization: an investigation of young German and English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3): 539–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, S., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (in press). Development of word order in German complement-clause constructions: effects of input frequencies, lexical items and discourse function. Language.
Brent, M. R. (1999). An efficient, probabilistically sound algorithm for segmentation and word discovery. Machine Learning, 34: 71–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M. R. and Cartwright, T. A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactics are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61: 93–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M. R. and Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromberg, H. S. and Wexler, K. (1995). Null subjects in child wh-questions. In C. T. Schütze, J. Ganger and K. Broihier (eds.), Papers in Language Processing and Acquisition (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26) (pp. 221–47). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Brooks, P. J. and Braine, M. D. (1996). What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Cognition, 60(3): 235–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J. and Sekerina, I. A. (2006). Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition, 13(3): 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J. and Tomasello, M. (1999a). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 35(1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, P. J. and Tomasello, M. (1999b). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75(4): 720–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J. and Zizak, O. (2002). Does pre-emption help children learn verb transitivity? Journal of Child Language, 29: 759–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., Dodson, K. and Lewis, L. B. (1999). Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. Child Development, 70(6): 1325–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, P. J., Jia, Xiangdong, Braine, M. D. S. and Da Graca Dias, M. (1998). A cross-linguistic study of children's comprehension of universal quantifiers: a comparison of Mandarin Chinese, Portuguese and English. First Language, 18(52): 33–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. and Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). The importance of eyes: how infants interpret adult looking behavior. Developmental Psychology, 38: 958–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, R. and Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental Science, 8: 535–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. (1998). Children's first verbs in Tzeltal: evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics, 36: 713–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1978). Berlyne Memorial Lecture: ‘Acquiring the uses of language’. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32(4): 204–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucci, W. (1978). The interpretation of universal affirmative propositions: a developmental study. Cognition, 6: 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5): 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. and Moder, C. L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. and Schiebmann, J. (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English. Linguistics, 37: 575–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. and Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58(2): 265–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, H., McDaniel, D., Hsu, J. R. and Rapp, M. (1994). A longitudinal study of principles of control and coreference in child English. Language, 70: 260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantrall, W. (1974). Viewpoint, Reflexives and the Nature of Noun Phrases. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Carey, S. and Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development [Stanford University], 15: 17–29.Google Scholar
Carnie, A. (2006). Syntax: A Generative Introduction. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N. and Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2): 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M., Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (2002). Understanding ‘prior intentions’ enables two-year-olds to imitatively learn a complex task. Child Development, 73(5): 1431–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K. and Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4): i--vi, 1–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cartwright, T. A. and Brent, M. R. (1997). Syntactic categorization in early language acquisition: formalizing the role of distributional analysis. Cognition, 63(2): 121–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casenhiser, D. and Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6): 500–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassidy, K. W. and Kelly, M. H. (1991). Phonological information for grammatical category assignments. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(3): 348–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, K. W. and Kelly, M. H. (2001). Children's use of phonology to infer grammatical class in vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(3): 519–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cazden, C. B. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development, 39(2): 433–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, A., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2009). Children's understanding of the agent--patient relations in the transitive construction: cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(2): 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A., Meints, K., Lieven, E. V. M. and Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children's comprehension of English word order in act-out and intermodal preferential looking tasks. Cognitive Development, 25: 30–45.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S. and Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2): 234–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chemla, E., Mintz, T. H., Bernal, S. and Christophe, A. (2009). Categorizing words using ‘frequent frames’: what cross-linguistic analyses reveal about distributional acquisition strategies. Developmental Science, 12(3): 396–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chien, Y. and Wexler, K. (1990). Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1: 225–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childers, J. B. and Tomasello, M. (2001). The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology, 37(6): 739–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, J., B. and Tomasello, M. (2002). Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. Developmental Psychology, 38(6): 867–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, J. B., Vaughan, J. and Burquest, D. A. (2007). Joint attention and word learning in Ngas-speaking toddlers in Nigeria. Journal of Child Language, 34(2): 199–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1): 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). In M. Piatelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chouinard, M. M. and Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30(3): 637–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. and Kirby, S. (eds.) (2003). Language Evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. H. and Monaghan, P. (2006). Discovering verbs through multiple-cue integration. In Hirsh-Pasek, K. and Golinkoff, R. (eds.), Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs (pp. 544–64). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christophe, A., Guasti, T., Nespor, M., Dupoux, E. and Ooyen, B. (1997). Reflections on phonological bootstrapping: its role for lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6): 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christophe, A., Millotte, S., Bernal, S. and Lidz, J. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Speech, 51: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christophe, A., Nespor, M., Guasti, M. T. and Ooyen, B. (2003). Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: the case of the head-direction parameter. Developmental Science, 6(2): 211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimpian, A. and Markman, E. M. (2005). The absence of a shape bias in children's word learning. Developmental Psychology, 41(6): 1003–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H. (1986). Verb inflections in German child language, acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics, 24(1): 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1991). Constraints on parameter setting: a grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition, 1: 361–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. and Almazan, M. (1998). Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition, 68(3): 167–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P. (1996). How adult second language learning differs from child first language development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(4): 721–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 65–110). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1978). Awareness of language: some evidence from what children say and do. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R. J. and Levelt, W. J. M. (eds.), The Child's Conception of Language (pp. 17–43). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 15(2): 317–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. and Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55: 767–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. and Grossman, J. B. (1998). Pragmatic directions and children's word learning. Journal of Child Language, 25(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V., Carpenter, K. L. and Deutsch, W. (1995). Reference states and reversals: undoing actions with verbs. Journal of Child Language, 22(3): 633–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. and Svaib, T. A. (1997). Speaker perspective and reference in young children. First Language, 17(51): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, V., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M. and Rowland, C. F. (2010). Locative overgeneralization errors: the effects of verb semantics and verb frequency. Unpublished MS.
Colledge, E., Bishop, D. V. M., Koeppen-Schomerus, G., Price, T., Happé, F., Eley, T., Dale, P. and Plomin, R. (2002). The structure of language abilities at 4 years: a twin study. Developmental Psychology, 38: 749–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comrie, B. (1985). Reflections on subject and object control. Journal of Semantics, 4(1): 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N. and Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42: 741–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conwell, E. and Morgan, J. L. (2010). When parents verb nouns: resolving the ambicategory problem. Unpublished MS.
Cooper, W. E. and Sorenson, J. M. (1977). Fundamental frequency contours at syntactic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(3): 683–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, W. and Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. (1982). Strategies in the acquisition of relative clauses. In J. Aitchison and N. Harvey (eds.), Working Papers of the London Psycholinguistic Research Group, 4: 37–49.
Correa, L. M. (1995). An alternative assessment of children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24: 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, G. W. and Plunkett, K. (1994). Acquiring the mapping from meanings to sounds. Connection Science, 6(4): 379–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14: 597–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. and Fodor, J. D. (1993). Competence and performance. In Dromi, E (ed.), Language and Cognition: A Developmental Perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Crain, S. and McKee, C. (1986). Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. NELS 16: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 94–110). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Crain, S., McKee, C. and Emiliani, M. (1990). Visiting relatives in Italy. In Frazier, L and Villiers, J (eds.), Language Processing and Language Acquisition (pp. 355–6). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Crain, S. and Nakayama, M. (1987). Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language, 63: 522–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D. and Woodams, E. (1996). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5(2): 83–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. and Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, T. H. and House, A. (1988). Segmental duration in connected speech signals: current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83: 1553–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S. and Werker, J. F. (2007). The perceptual foundations of phonological development. In Gaskell, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 579–99). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S., Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Rigler, D. and Rigler, M. (1974). The linguistic development of Genie. Language, 50(3): 528–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. and Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2: 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: the Polish genitive. Journal of Child Language, 28: 545–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dąbrowska, E. (2008). Questions with long-distance dependencies: a usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 19(3): 391–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. and Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3): 437–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. and Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28: 604–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. and Szczerbiński, M. (2006). Polish children's productivity with case marking: the role of regularity, type frequency and phonological diversity. Journal of Child Language, 33(3): 559–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dąbrowska, E., Rowland, C. and Theakston, A. (2009). The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3): 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasinger, L. and Toupin, C. (1994). The development of relative clause functions in narratives. In Berman, A. and Slobin, D. I (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study (pp. 457–514). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Davis, H. (2009). Cross-linguistic variation in anaphoric dependencies: evidence from the Pacific Northwest. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27(1): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boer, B. (2000). Self-organization in vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 28(4): 441–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cat, Cécile (2002). Apparent non-nominative subjects in L1 French. In Paradis, J. and Prévost, P. (eds.), The Acquisition of French in Different Contexts: Focus on Functional Categories (pp. 53–88). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Léon, L. (1999). Why Tzotzil children prefer verbs over nouns. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference for the Study of Child Language. San Sebastian, Donostia, Spain.
Villiers, J. G. (1991). Why questions? In Maxwell, T. and Plunkett, B. (eds.), Papers in the Acquisition of ‘Wh’ (pp. 155–71). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Villiers, J. G. and Pyers, J. (2002). Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17(1): 1037–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiers, J. G. and Villiers, P. A. (1999). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. In Mitchell, P. (ed.), Children's Reasoning and the Mind. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Villiers, J. G., Flusberg, H. B., Hakuta, K. and Cohen, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 8(5): 499–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villiers, J., Roeper, T. and Vainikka, A. (1990). The acquisition of long-distance rules. In Frazier, L and Villiers, J (eds.), Language Processing and Language Acquisition (pp. 257–97). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Deak, G. O. (2000). Hunting the fox of word learning: why ‘constraints’ fail to capture it. Developmental Review, 20: 29–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deak, G. O. and Maratsos, M. (1998). On having complex representations of things: preschoolers use multiple words for objects and people. Developmental Psychology, 34(2): 224–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene, S. and Hertz-Pannier, L. (2002). Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science, 298: 2013–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N. and Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: the role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13(2): 275–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, K. (1990). Subject, topic and Sesotho passive. Journal of Child Language, 17(1): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Entremont, B., Hains, S. and Muir, D. (1997). A demonstration of gaze following in 3- to 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 20: 569–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesendruck, G. (2005). The principles of conventionality and contrast in word learning: an empirical examination. Developmental Psychology, 41(3): 451–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesendruck, G. and Markson, L. (2001). Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology, 37(5): 630–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diesendruck, G., Markson, L., Akhtar, N. and Reudor, A. (2004). Two-year-olds' sensitivity to speakers' intent: an alternative account of Samuelson and Smith. Developmental Science, 7(1): 33–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diessel, H. and Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2): 131–51.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. and Tomasello, M. (2001). The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: a corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2): 97–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. and Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81(4): 882–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2008a). German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development, 79(4): 1152–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2008b). Young German children's early syntactic competence: a preferential looking study. Developmental Science, 11(4): 575–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R. M. W. (2004). Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology (pp. 30–83). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dockrell, J. and Campbell, R. N. (1986). Lexical acquisition strategies in the preschool child. In Kuczaj, S. A. II and Barrett, M. D. (eds.), The Development of Word Meaning: Progress in Cognitive Development Research (pp. 121–54). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, K. and Tomasello, M. (1998). Acquiring the transitive construction in English: the role of animacy and pronouns. Journal of Child Language, 25: 555–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donegan, P. J. and Stampe, D. (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen, I. (ed.), Current Approaches to Phonological Theory (pp. 126–73). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Donnai, D. and Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2000). Williams syndrome: from genotype through to the cognitive phenotype. American Journal of Medical Genetics: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 97(2): 164–71.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressler, W. U., Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O. and Wurzel, W. U. (1988). Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Dromi, E. (1987). Early Lexical Development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drozd, K. (2001). Children's weak interpretation of universally quantified sentences. In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Conceptual Development and Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drozd, K. (2004). Learnability and linguistic performance. Journal of Child Language, 31: 431–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duez, D. (1993). Acoustic correlates of subjective pauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22: 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. W. and Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171: 303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisele, J. (1988). Meaning and form in children's judgments about language: a study of the truth-value judgment test. Unpublished master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition, 48(1): 71–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. and Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S. E., Lai, C. S. L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A. P. and Pääbo, S. (2002). Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature, 418: 869–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estigarribia, B. (2010). Facilitation by variation: right-to-left learning of English yes/no questions. Cognitive Science, 34(1): 68–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. (1980). Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 11: 337–62.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. M., MacWhinney, B. and Sacco, K. (2002). Sentence processing in children with early unilateral brain injury. Brain and Language, 83: 335–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felser, C. and Clahsen, H. (2009). Grammatical processing of spoken language in child and adult language learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38: 305–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. and Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A. and McRoberts, G. (1996). Prosodic bootstrapping: a critical analysis of the argument and the evidence. In Morgan, J. and Demuth, K. (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 365–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A. and McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science, 9(3): 228–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L. and Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In Sekerina, I. A., Fernández, E. M. and Clahsen, H. (eds.), Developmental Psycholinguistics: On-line Methods in Children's Language Processing (pp. 97–135). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., Di Nubila, J. A. and Vouloumanos, A. (2006). From semantics to syntax and back again: argument structure in the third year of life. Cognition, 100(2): B10–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fikkert, P. (2007). Acquiring phonology. In Lacy, P. (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 537–54). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. and Levelt, C. (2008). How does place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in the developing phonological grammar. In Avery, P., Dresher, B. E. and Rice, K. (eds.), Contrast in Phonology: Perception and Acquisition (pp. 231–68). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. and O'Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language, 64(3): 501–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children's interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1): 41–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C. (2000). From form to meaning: a role for structural alignment in the acquisition of language. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 27: 1–53.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. (2002). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition, 82(3): 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. and Tokura, H. (1996). Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: cross-linguistic evidence. Child Development, 67(6): 3192–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C. and Tokura, H. (1996). Prosody in speech to infants: direct and indirect acoustic cues to syntactic structure. In Morgan, J. L. and Demuth, K. (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 343–63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (2003). Evaluating models of parameter setting. Handout, LSA Summer Institute. (cited in Tomasello, 2007)
Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. (1998). Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Enquiry, 29(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, N. and Plunkett, K. (1994). Learning the Arabic plural: the case of minority default mappings in connectionist networks. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Best, C. T. and McRoberts, G. W. (1990). Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants. Perception and Psychophysics, 48: 559–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, B. A. and Thompson, S. A. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversations. Language, 66: 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. and Grodzinsky, Y. (1998). Children's passive: a view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29: 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, F. and Butterworth, G. (1996). Pointing and social awareness: declaring and requesting in the second year. Journal of Child Language, 23(2): 307–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fremgen, A. and Fay, D. (1980). Overextensions in production and comprehension: a methodological clarification. Journal of Child Language, 7(1): 205–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., Aguado-Orea, J. and Gobet, F. (2007). Modelling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German and Spanish using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science, 31(2): 311–41.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M, Aguado-Orea, J.J. and Gobet, F. (in press). (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language, 37(3): 643–69.
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M. and Gobet, F. (2005a). Simulating Optional Infinitive errors in child speech through the omission of sentence-internal elements. In Bara, B. G., Barsalou, L. and Buchiarelli, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 708–13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D.Pine, J.M. and Gobet, F. (2005b). Simulating the cross-linguistic development of Optional Infinitive errors in MOSAIC. In Bara, B. G., Barsalou, L. and Buchiarelli, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 702–7). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M. and Gobet, F. (2005c). On the resolution of ambiguities in the extraction of syntactic categories through chunking. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(1): 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M. and Gobet, F. (2009). Simulating the referential properties of Dutch, German and English Root Infinitives in MOSAIC. Language Learning and Development, 5: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A. D. (2009). Neurocognition of language development. In Bavin, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language (pp. 51–67). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambell, T. and Yang, C. D. (2003). Scope and limits of statistical learning in word segmentation. NELS 34: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society Meeting (pp. 29–30). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Gambell, T. and Yang, C.D. (2005). Mechanisms and constraints in word segmentation. Unpublished MS, Yale University.
Ganger, J. and Brent, M. R. (2004). Re-examining the vocabulary spurt. Developmental Psychology, 40(4): 621–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. and Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: is there a causal connection?Journal of Memory and Language, 29: 336–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., Sebastián, E. and Soto, P. (1999). The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism, 2 and 3: 133–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. and Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: a psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15: 411–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, S. A. (ed.), Language Development, vol. 2: Language, Thought, and Culture (pp. 301–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (2006). Why verbs are hard to learn. In Hirsh-Pasek, K. and Golinkoff, R. (eds.), Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs (pp. 544–64). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. and Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity and early word learning. In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (pp. 15–256). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. and Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65: 263–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H. and Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415: 755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerken, L., Jusczyk, P. W. and Mandel, D. R. (1994). When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases. Cognition, 51(3): 237–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C. and Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17(8): 684–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geurts, B. (2003). Quantifying kids. Language Acquisition, 11: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. and Wexler, K. (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 25: 407–54.Google Scholar
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. and Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73(2): 135–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1: 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnanadesikan, A. (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Kager, R., Pater, J. and Zonneveld, W. (eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition (pp. 73–108). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godden, D. R. and Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in 2 natural environments – land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66 (Aug): 325–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The Resilience of Language: What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972). Pauses, clauses, sentences. Language and Speech, 15: 103–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M., Mervis, C. and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1994). Early object labels: the case for a developmental lexical principles framework. Journal of Child Language, 21: 125–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M., Suff-Bailey, M., Olguin, R. and Ruan, W. J. (1995). Young children extend novel words at the basic level – evidence for the principle of categorical scope. Developmental Psychology, 31(3): 494–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5): 431–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, R. L. (2007). Statistical learning in infant language development. In Gaskell, M. G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 601–15). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. (1993). Understanding Aphasia. San Diego: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodluck, H. and Tavakolian, S. (1982). Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses. Cognition, 11(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, A. and Choi, S. (1995). Names, relational words and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: nouns are not always learned before verbs. In Tomasello, M. and Merriman, W. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs (pp. 63–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. and Meltzoff, A. N. (1992). Categorization and naming – basic-level sorting in 18-month-olds and its relation to language. Child Development, 63(5): 1091–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M. (1990). Feature-blind grammar and dysphasia. Nature, 344: 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. C. (1996). The truth value judgment task. In McDaniel, D, McKee, C and Cairns, H. S (eds.), Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax (pp. 211–32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. and Chafetz, J. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives. Cognition, 36(3): 227–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grassmann, S. and Tomasello, M. (2007). Two-year-olds use primary sentence accent to learn new words. Journal of Child Language, 34(3): 677–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grassmann, S., Stracke, M. and Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-olds exclude novel objects as potential referents of novel words based on pragmatics. Cognition, 112(3): 488–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenfield, P. M. and Smith, J. H. (1976). The Structure of Communication in Early Language Development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grieser, D. and Kuhl, P. K. (1989). Categorization of speech by infants: support for speech-sound prototypes. Developmental Psychology, 25: 577–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. and Rosen, S. T. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 21: 187–222.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. and Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 69–101.Google Scholar
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. and Goldberg, R. (1991a). Affectedness and direct objects – the role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition, 41(1–3): 153–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. and Goldberg, R. (1991b). Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 18(1): 115–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R. and Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65(2): 203–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünloh, T., Lieven, E. V. M. and Tomasello, M. (2009). German children's use of prosodic cues in resolving participant roles in transitive constructions. Poster presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development 34, Boston, MA.
Guasti, M. T. (2004). Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, M., Thornton, R. and Wexler, K. (1995). Negation in children's questions: the case of English. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 228–39). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Guilfoyle, E. and Noonan, M. (1992). Functional categories and language-acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics – Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 37(2): 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. and Jacobs, H. (1998). Understanding Phonology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hahn, U. and Nakisa, , R. C. (2000). German inflection: single route or dual route. Cognitive Psychology, 47(4): 313–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E. and Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: a test of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14(1): 31–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, D. G., Waxman, , Hurwitz, S. R., W. M. (1993). How two- and four-year-old children interpret adjectives and count nouns. Child Development, 64: 1651–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, H. and Crain, S. (1982). Relative acquisition. In Kuczaj, S (ed.), Language Development: Syntax and Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Happé, F. (2003). Cognition in autism: one deficit or many? Novartis Foundation Symposium, 251: 198–207.Google ScholarPubMed
Happé, F. and Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature Neuroscience, 9: 1218–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B. and Tomasello, M. (1999). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(2): 173–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, B. and Tomasello, M. (2004). Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Animal Behaviour, 68: 571–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, M. and Elman, J. L. (1995). Learning and morphological change. Cognition, 56(1): 61–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, M., Elman, J. L. and Daugherty, K. G. (1995). Default generalisation in connectionist networks. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(6): 601–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. L. and Bates, E. A. (2002). Clausal backgrounding and pronominal reference: a functionalist approach to c-command. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(3): 237–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. (1992). Language Experience and Early Language Development: From Input to Uptake. Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, J. K. and Ullman, M. (2006). Why girls say ‘holded’ more than boys. Developmental Science, 9(1): 21–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hattori, R. (2003). Why do children say ‘did you went?’ The role of do-support. Poster presented at the Twenty-Eighth Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002). The language faculty: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science, 298: 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., Bishop, D. V. M. and Plunkett, K. (2004). Simulating SLI: general cognitive processing stressors can produce a specific linguistic profile. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47(6): 1347–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M. and Naigles, L. (1996). The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D., Jusczyk, P. W., Cassidy, K. W., Druss, B. and Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26: 269–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeffner, J. (1996). A single mechanism account of English past tense acquisition and processing. Unpublished PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
Hoekstra, T. and Hyams, N. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106(1–4): 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. (2001). Language Development (2nd edn). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (in press). The Guide to Research Methods in Child Language. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M. and Bloom, L. (2000). Breaking the Language Barrier: An Emergentist Coalition Model for the Origins of Word Learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google ScholarPubMed
Horgan, D. (1978). Development of full passive. Journal of Child Language, 5(1): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K. and Duffy, H. (2006). The use of social and salience cues in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(1): 27–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K. and Harris, P. (2005). ‘Word-learning wizardry’ at 1;6. Journal of Child Language, 32(1): 175–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, J. R., Cairns, H. S., Eisenberg, S. and Schlisselberg, G. (1989). Control and coreference in early child language. Journal of Child Language, 16(3): 599–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, J., Cairns, H. and Fiengo, R. (1985). The development of grammars underlying children's interpretation of complex sentences. Cognition, 20: 25–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M. and Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(2): 182–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. (1994). Non-discreteness and variation in child language: implications for principle and parameter models of language development. In Levy, Y. (ed.), Other Children, Other Languages (pp. 11–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Gentner, D. and Uchida, N. (1994). Children's theories of word meaning – the role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9(1): 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. and Shaw, C. (1981). The comprehension of pronominal reference in children. Unpublished MS, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J. (1964). The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Israel, M., Johnson, C. and Brooks, P. J. (2000). From states to events: the acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics, 11: 1–2.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. ([1941] 1968). Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton. (Translated into English by A. R. Keiler, originally published in 1941 as Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze.)Google Scholar
Jelinek, E. and Demers, R. (1994). Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language, 70: 697–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. K. and Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: when speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language, 44: 548–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S. and Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in 2nd language-learning – the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a 2nd language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1): 60–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C. J., Durieux-Smith, A. and Bloom, K. (2005). Teaching gestural signs to infants to advance child development: a review of the evidence. First Language, 25: 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G., Gobet, F. and Pine, J. M. (2000). A process model of children's early verb use. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 723–28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, P. E. (1995). Contradictions and unanswered questions in the Genie case: a fresh look at the linguistic evidence. Language and Communication, 15(3): 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). Perception of syllable-final stop consonants by two-month-old infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 21: 450–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. and Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W. and Thompson, E. J. (1978). Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by two-month-old infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 23: 105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V. Y. and Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32: 402–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P.W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Kennedy, L., Woodward, A. and Piwoz, J. (1992). Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2): 252–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Hohne, E. A. and Bauman, A. (1999). Infant's sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception and Psychophysics, 61: 1465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M. and Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39: 159–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Pisoni, D. B. and Mullenix, J. (1992). Some consequences of stimulus variability in speech processing by two-month-old infants. Cognition, 43: 253–91.
Kager, R., Pater, J. and Zonneveld, W. (2004). Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2006). Modules, genes and evolution: what have we learned from atypical development? Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development: Attention and Performance, 21: 563–83.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2007). Atypical epigenesis. Developmental Science, 10: 84–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, P. and Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What's X doing Y? construction. Language, 75: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J. (2002). Language emergence in a language-ready brain. In Morgan, G. and Woll, B. (eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition (pp. 207–54). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: the role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99(2): 349–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keuleers, E. (2008). Memory-based learning of inflectional morphology. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Antwerp.
Keuleers, E. and Daelemans, W. (2007). Memory-based learning models of inflectional morphology: a methodological case study. Lingue e Linguaggio, 6(2): 151–74.Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Sandra, D., Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G. and Martens, E. (2007). Dutch plural inflection: the exception that proves the analogy. Cognitive Psychology, 54(4): 283–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, E. and Kirjavainen, M. (in press). Investigating the contribution of procedural and declarative memory to the acquisition of past tense morphology: evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes.
Kidd, E. and Bavin, E. L. (2002). English-Speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses: evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(6): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, E. and Lum, J. A. G. (2008). Sex differences in past tense over-regularization. Developmental Science, 11(6): 882–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E., Bavin, E. L. and Rhodes, B. (2001). Two-year olds' knowledge of verbs and argument structure. In Almgren, M. (ed.), Research on Child Language Acquisition (pp. 1368–82). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2007). Object relatives made easy: a cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6): 860–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E., Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M. (2006). Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition of sentential complements. Cognitive Development, 21: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E., Lieven, E. V. M. and Tomasello, M. (2010). Lexical frequency and exemplar-based learning effects in language acquisition: evidence from sentential complements. Language Sciences, 32(1): 132–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. J., Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. and Coppola, M. (1994). Sensitivity of children's inflection to grammatical structure. Journal of Child Language, 21(1): 173–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A. and Prasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science, 15(2): 173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., Cornish, H. and Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: an experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31): 10681–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., Dowman, M. and Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(12): 5241–5.
Kirjavainen, M., Theakston, A. and Lieven, E. (2009). Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language, 36(5): 1091–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A. and Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83: B35–B42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjelgaard, M. M. and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). An investigation of language impairment in autism: implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16: 287–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatt, D. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59: 1208–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, B. P. and Mervis, C. B. (1999). Contrasting patterns of cognitive abilities of 9- and 10-year-olds with Williams syndrome or Down syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16(2): 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kõrgvee, K. (2001). Lapse sõnavara areng vanuses 1;8–2;1 [A child's lexical development, aged 1;3–2;1]. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Tartu University.
Krajewski, G. (2007). Constructivist investigation into the development of Polish noun inflections in children between two and three-and-a-half years of age. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
Krajewski, G., Lieven, E. V. M. and Tomasello, M. (2010). The role of word order and case marking in Polish children's comprehension of transitives. Unpublished MS.
Krajewski, G., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M. and Tomasello, M. (in press). How Polish children switch from one case to another when using novel nouns: challenges for current models of inflectional morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes.
Kramer, I. (1993). The licensing of subjects in early child language. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 19: 197–212.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. (1982). Young children's overextensions of object words in comprehension and/or production: support for a prototype theory of early object word meaning. First Language, 3: 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S. and Brannick, N. (1979). Children's use of the wh-question modal auxiliary placement rule. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28: 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (1979). Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66: 1668–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P.K. (1983). Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 6: 263–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. and Padden, D. M. (1982). Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques. Perception and Psychophysics, 32: 542–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labelle, M. (1990). Predication, wh-movement and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 1: 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. and Labov, T. (1978). Learning the syntax of questions. In Campbell, R. and Smith, P. (eds.), Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, B. and Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, M. and Kemmer, S. (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language (pp. 1–63). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lederer, A., Gleitman, L. and Gleitman, H. (1995). Verbs of a feather flock together: structural properties of maternal speech. In Tomasello, M. and Merriman, W. (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lee, T. (1991). Linearity as a scope principle for Chinese: the evidence from first language acquisition. In Napoli, D. and Kegl, J. (eds.). Bridges between Psychology and Linguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Legate, J. A. and Yang, C. (2007). Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition, 14: 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1972). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 51: 2018–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2000). Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books; MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. B., Caselli, M. C. and Devescovi, A. (2002). Italian children's use of verb and noun morphology during the preschool years. First Language, 3(66): 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B., McGregor, K. K. and Allen, G. D. (1992). Grammatical morphology and speech perception in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(5): 1076–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. B., Schwartz, R. G., Morris, B. and Chapman, K. (1981). Factors influencing early lexical acquisition: lexical orientation and phonological composition. Child Development, 52: 882–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B. (1985). Lexical semantics in review: an introduction. In Levin, B. (ed.), Lexical Semantics in Review. Lexicon Project Working Papers no. I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1987). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: a partial pragmatic reduction of Binding and Control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics, 23: 379–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. D. and Elman, J. L. (2001). Learnability and the statistical structure of language: poverty of stimulus arguments revisited. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 359–70). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Li, P. and MacWhinney, B. (1996). Cryptotype, overgeneralization and competition: a connectionist model of the learning of English reversative prefixes. Connection Science, 8: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. M., DeLattre, P. D. and Cooper, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus variables in the perception of unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65: 497–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S. and Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54: 358–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liégeois, F., Baldeweg, T., Connelly, A., Gadian, D. G., Mishkin, M. and Vargha-Khadem, F. (2003). Language fMRI abnormalities associated with FOXP2 gene mutation. Nature Neuroscience, 6: 1230–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieven, E. V. M. (1994). Crosslinguistic and cross-cultural aspects of language addressed to children. In Gallaway, C. and Richards, B. J. (eds.), Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition (pp. 56–73). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M., Behrens, H., Speares, J. and Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30(2): 333–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. and Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24(1): 187–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. and Dresner-Barnes, H. (1992). Individual differences in early vocabulary development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction. Journal of Child Language, 19(2): 287–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieven, E. V. M., Salomo, D. and Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: a usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3): 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1991a). How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1991b). Subjacency and sex. Language and Communication, 11(1/2): 67–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 169–85). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. and Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20: 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Henning, A., Striano, T. and Tomasello, M. (2004). Twelve-month-olds point to share attention and interest. Developmental Science, 7(3): 297–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T. and Tomasello, M. (2006). Twelve- and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7: 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological Acquisition and Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Loeb, D. F. and Leonard, L. B. (1991). Subject case marking and verb morphology in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34: 340–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohmann, H. and Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: a training study. Child Development, 74: 1130–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, C. (1979). Don't you fall me down: children's generalizations regarding cause and transitivity. Papers and Reports on Child language Development (PRCLD) 17. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (2006). Child Language: Acquisition and Growth. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, B. and Clifford, T. (1986). The 3-D study: effects of depth, distance and directionality on children's acquisition of anaphora. In Lust, B. (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, vol. 1: Defining the Constraints (pp. 203–43). Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, B., Eisele, J. and Mazuka, R. (1992). The binding theory module: evidence from first language acquisition for Principle C. Language, 68: 333–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, B., Loveland, K. and Kornet, R. (1980). The development of anaphora in first language: syntactic and pragmatic constraints. Linguistic Analysis, 6: 359–91.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. (1979). Developmental reorganization of phonology. Lingua, 49: 11–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, J., Cleirigh, A. O. and Kellaghan, T. (1972). The structure of the English lexicon: the simplest hypothesis. Language and Speech, 15(2): 141–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4): 883–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. (eds.). (1989). The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. and Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Feldman, H. M., Sacco, K. and Valdés-Pérez, R. (2000). Online measures of basic language skills in children with early focal brain lesions. Brain and Language, 71: 400–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandel, D. R. and Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). Infants' early words: familiar people and the changing nature of name representations. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
Mandel, D. R., Jusczyk, P. W. and Pisoni, D. B. (1995). Infants' recognition of the sound patterns of their own names. Psychological Science, 6: 315–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M. P. (1974). How preschool children understand missing complement subjects. Child Development, 45: 700–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M. (2000). More overregularizations after all: new data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen and Xu. Journal of Child Language, 27(1): 183–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M. and Chalkley, M. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's Language, vol. 2 (pp. 127–51). New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. and Kuczaj, S. (1978). Against the transformationalist account: a simpler analysis of auxiliary overmarking. Journal of Child Language, 5: 337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. P., Fox, D. E., Becker, J. A. and Chalkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition, 19(2): 167–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M. P., Gudeman, R., Gerard-Ngo, P. and DeHart, G. (1987). A study in novel word learning: the productivity of the causative. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 89–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. (1997). Children's productivity in the English past tense: the role of frequency, phonology and neighborhood structure. Cognitive Science, 21(3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Plunkett, K. and Goodman, J. (1997). Overregularization in English plural and past tense inflectional morphology: a response to Marcus (1995). Journal of Child Language, 24(3): 767–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Wulfeck, B. and Weismer, S. E. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42: 206–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, G. F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46(1): 53–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, G. F. (1995). Children's overregularization of English plurals: a quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22(2): 447–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, G. F. (1995). The acquisition of the English past tense in children and multilayered connectionist networks. Cognition, 56(3): 271–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, G. F. and Fisher, S. E. (2003). FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 257–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R. and Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: the exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3): 189–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J. and Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language-acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4): R5–R165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, E. M. and Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M. and Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20: 121–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markson, L. and Bloom, P. (1997). Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature, 385: 813–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maslen, R. J. C., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M. and Tomasello, M. (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural over-regularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47: 1319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D. E. and Theakston, A. L. (2006). Errors of omission in English-speaking children's production of plurals and the past tense: the effects of frequency, phonology and competition. Cognitive Science, 30(6): 1027–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. L. and Tomasello, M. (2004). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20: 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. and Tomasello, M. (2007). French children's use and correction of weird word orders: a constructivist account. Journal of Child Language, 34(2): 381–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. and Tomasello, M. (2009). Pronoun co-referencing errors: challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3): 599–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. L., Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A. and Morgan, J. L. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38: 465–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayberry, R. I. (2009). Early language acquisition and adult language ability: what sign language reveals about the Critical Period for Language. In Marshak, M. and Spencer, P. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language and Education, vol. 2 (ch. 19). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maye, J. and Gerken, L. (2000). Learning phonemes without minimal pairs. In Howell, S. C., Fish, S. A. and Keith-Lucas, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 522–33). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Maye, J., Werker, J. F. and Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82: 101–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazuka, R. (1996). Can a grammatical parameter be set before the first word? Prosodic contributions to early setting of a grammatical parameter. In Morgan, J. and Demuth, K. (eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition (pp. 313–30). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. (1954). Language development in children. In Carmichael, L. (ed.), Manual of Child Psychology (pp. 492–630). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. (1992). Justifying part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 20(2): 211–46.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L. and Patterson, K. (2002). ‘Words or rules’ cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions – reply to Pinker and Ullman. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11): 464–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, K., Pine, J. M. and Lieven, E. V. M. (2006). Investigating the abstractness of children's early knowledge of argument structure. Journal of Child Language, 33: 693–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDaniel, D. and Maxfield, T. L. (1992). Principle B and contrastive stress. Language Acquisition, 2: 337–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, D., Cairns, H. S. and Hsu, J. R. (1990/1). Control principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition, 1(4): 297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (1989). The acquisition of cue-category mappings. In MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. (eds.), The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, C. (1992). A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1: 21–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C., McDaniel, D. and Snedeker, J. (1998). Relatives children say. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27: 573–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeill, D. (1966). Capacity for language acquisition. Volta Review, 68(1): 17–33.Google Scholar
McShane, J. (1980). Learning to Talk. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. and Muller, N. (1992). Finiteness and verb placement in early child grammars: evidence from simultaneous acquisition of French and German in bilinguals. In Meisel, J. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement (pp. 109–38). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31: 838–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic and phonological capabilities. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language Production (pp. 3–50). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. and Menn, L. (1979). Early strategies for the perception and production of words and sounds. In Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (eds.), Language Acquisition: Studies in First Language Development (pp. 49–70). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B., Golinkoff, R. M. and Bertrand, J. (1994). Two-year-olds readily learn multiple labels for the same basic-level category. Child Development, 65(4): 1163–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messenger, K., Branigan, H., McLean, J. and Sorace, A. (2009). Semantic factors in young children's comprehension and production of passives. In Chandlee, J., Franchini, M., Lord, S. and Rheiner, G.-M., (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 355–66). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, J. (2008). The Emergence of Distinctive Features. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. L. and Eimas, P. D. (1983). Studies on the categorization of speech by infants. Cognition, 13: 135–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, A. E. (1985). Speech acquisition in childhood – a study on the development of syntax in small children – German. Journal of Child Language, 12(1): 239–44.Google Scholar
Mintz, T. H. (2002). Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language. Memory and Cognition, 30(5): 678–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, T., H. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90: 91–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, T. H. (2006). Finding the verbs: distributional cues to categories available to young learners. In Hirsh-Pasek, K. and Golinkoff, R. M. (eds.), Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs (pp. 31–63). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L. and Bever, T. G. (2002). The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science, 26(4): 393–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, H. and Tomasello, M. (2007). How 14- and 18-month-olds know what others have experienced. Developmental Psychology, 43(2): 309–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, H., Carpenter, M. and Tomasello, M. (2007). Fourteen-month-olds know what others experience only in joint engagement. Developmental Science, 10(6): 826–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, H., Koring, C., Carpenter, M. and Tomasello, M. (2006). Infants determine others' focus of attention by pragmatics and exclusion. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(3): 411–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., Angelopoulos, M. and Bennett, P. (1999). Word learning in the context of referential and salience cues. Developmental Psychology, 35(1): 60–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, P. A. (1972). The discrimination of speech and non-speech stimuli in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14: 477–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E. and Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: implications for acquisition and instruction. In McKeown, M. G. and Curtis, M. E. (eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17(2): 357–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L. R. (1996). The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping. Cognition, 58(2): 221–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L. G. and Kako, E. T. (1993). 1st contact in verb acquisition – defining a role for syntax. Child Development, 64(6): 1665–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Kemler Nelson, D., Jusczyk, P. W. and Jusczyk, A. M. (2000). Six-month-olds' detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: effects of prosodic well-formedness. Infancy, 1: 123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Variations in children's concepts by age and category. Child Development, 45(3): 577–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1985). Making Sense: The Acquisition of Shared Meaning. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K., Hampson, J. and Shaw, L. K. (1993). Nouns in early lexicons – evidence, explanations and implications. Journal of Child Language, 20(1): 61–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (1991). Functional explanations in linguistics and the origins of language. Language and Communication, 11(1/2): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L. and Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48(2): 127–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. C. (1996). A language learning model for finite parameter spaces. Cognition, 61: 161–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noble, C. H. (2009). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.
Noble, C. H., Rowland, C. F. and Pine, J. M. (in press). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: evidence from infants and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science.
Olguin, R. and Tomasello, M. (1993). 25-month-old children do not have a grammatical category of verb. Cognitive Development, 8(3): 245–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, D. K. (2000). The Emergence of the Speech Capacity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K., Wieman, L., Doyle, W. and Ross, C. (1975). Infant babbling and speech. Journal of Child Language, 3: 1‑11.Google Scholar
Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K. and Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2): 225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oviatt, S. L. (1980). The emerging ability to comprehend language: an experimental approach. Child Development, 51(1): 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M. and Mehler, J. (2002). Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298: 604–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesisProceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 157–89). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. and Menn, L. (1990). The microstructure of the development of grammatical morphemes: variation across children and across languages. ICS Technical Report no. 90-19. University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
Peters, A.M. and Menn, L. (1993). False starts and filler syllables: ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language, 69(4): 742–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, W. (1995). Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Philip, W. and Verrips, M. (1994). Dutch preschoolers' elke. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Pickering, M. J. and Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3): 427–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, A. E. (1992). Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars. Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46: 115–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pine, J. M. and Lieven, E. V. M. (1993). Reanalyzing rote-learned phrases – individual-differences in the transition to multi-word speech. Journal of Child Language, 20(3): 551–71.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M. and Lieven, E. V. M. (1997). Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(2): 123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M. and Martindale, H. (1996). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children: the case of the determiner. Journal of Child Language, 23(2): 369–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pine, J. M., Conti-Ramsden, G., Joseph, K. L., Lieven, E. V. M. and Serratrice, L. (2008). Tense over time: testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model as an account of the pattern of tense-marking provision in early child English. Journal of Child Language, 35(1): 55–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. M. and Rowland, C. F. (1998). Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category. Linguistics, 36(4): 807–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J., Rowland, C. F., Lieven, E. V. M. and Theakston, A. L. (2005). Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: why the data on children's use of non-nominative subjects count against the ATOM. Journal of Child Language, 32: 269–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7: 217–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1987). The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 339–441). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989a). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989b). Resolving a learnability paradox in the acquisition of the verb lexicon. In Rice, M. L. and Shiefelsbusch, R. L. (eds.), The Teachability of Language. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994a). How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics? Lingua, 92: 377–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994b). The Language Instinct. New York: Harper Collins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2004). Clarifying the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4): 949–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Science, 13: 707–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: what's special about it? Cognition, 95: 201–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. and Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28(1–2): 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. and Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11): 456–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D. S. and Frost, L. A. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26(3): 195–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pisoni, D. B. (1977). Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61: 1352–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzuto, E. and Caselli, C. (1994). The acquisition of Italian verb morphology in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Levy, Y. (ed.), Other Children, Other Languages (pp. 137–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. and Kovas, Y. (2005). Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychological Bulletin, 131: 592–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plunkett, K. and Juola, P. (1999). A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology. Cognitive Science, 23(4): 463–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, K. and Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effect in a multi-layered perceptron: implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38(1): 43–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, K. and Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48(1): 21–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plunkett, K. and Nakisa, R. C. (1997). A connectionist model of the Arabic plural system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6): 807–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. and Wexler, K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polka, L. and Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20: 421–35.Google Scholar
Prasada, S. and Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(1): 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A. and Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. In McCarthy, J. (ed.), Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader (pp. 3–71). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. K. and Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. Linguistic Review, 19: 9–50.Google Scholar
Pye, C. and Quixtan Poz, P. (1989). Why functionalism won't function: the acquisition of passives and antipassives in K'iche' Mayan. Working Papers in Language Development, 4: 39–53. The Child Language Program, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1994). The syntax of questions in child English. Journal of Child Language, 21(1): 201–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radford, A. (1996). Towards a structure building model of acquisition. In Clahsen, H. (ed.), Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition (pp. 43–90). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. and Ploennig-Pacheco, I. (1995). The morphosyntax of subjects and verbs in child Spanish: a case study. Essex Reports in Linguistics, 5: 23–67.Google Scholar
Ramscar, M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45: 45–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, M. and Yarlett, D. (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: a new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31: 927–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, J. H. (1990). Catapults and pendulums: the mechanics of language-acquisition. Linguistics, 28(6): 1381–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reali, F. and Christiansen, M. H. (2004). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science, 29: 1007–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redington, M., Chater, N. and Finch, S. (1998). Distributional information: a powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science, 22(4): 425–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. and Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(6): 1239–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L., Wexler, K. and Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 41(6): 1412–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L. and Wexler, K. (1996). A phenotype of specific language impairment: extended optional infinitives. In Rice, M. (ed.), Towards a Genetics of Language (pp. 215–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, J. (2003). When can a language have nouns and verbs? Acta Linguistica Hafniensa, 35: 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, M. (1991). The mosaic acquisition of grammatical relations. Journal of Child Language, 18(3): 517–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispoli, M. (1994). Pronoun case overextension and paradigm building. Journal of Child Language, 21: 157–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispoli, M. (1999). Case and agreement in English language development. Journal of Child Language, 26: 357–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzi, L. (1993/4). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: the case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 3: 371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (1987). Modal subordination, distributivity and anaphora. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Roberts, L., Marinis, T., Felser, C. and Clahsen, H. (2007). Antecedent priming at trace positions in children's sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(2): 175–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roeper, T. and Villiers, J. (1991). The emergence of bound variable structures. In T. L. Maxfield and Plunkett, B (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers: Papers in the Acquisition of WH (pp. 267–82). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Rossen, M., Klima, E. S., Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A. and Jones, W. (1996). Interaction between language and cognition: evidence from Williams Syndrome. In Beitchman, J. H., Cohen, N. J., Konstantareas, M. M. and Tannock, R. (eds.), Language, Learning and Behavior Disorders: Developmental, Biological and Clinical Perspectives (pp. 367–92). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. F. (2007). Explaining errors in children's questions. Cognition, 104(1): 106–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, C. F. and Fletcher, S. L. (2006). The effect of sampling on estimates of lexical specificity and error rates. Journal of Child Language, 33(4): 859–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, C. F. and Pine, J. M. (2000). Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know!’Journal of Child Language, 27(1): 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, C. F. and Theakston, A. L. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: The modals and auxiliary DO. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52(6): 1471–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubino, R. B. and Pine, J. M. (1998). Subject–verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: what low error rates hide. Journal of Child Language, 25(1): 35–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1986). Learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules of parallel distributed processing? In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. and Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-olds. Science, 274: 1926–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N. and Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70: 27–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakas, W. G. and Fodor, J. D. (2001). The structural triggers learner. In Bertolo, S. (ed.), Language Acquisition and Learnability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, L. K. and Smith, L. B. (1998). Memory and attention make smart word learning: an alternative account of Akhtar, Carpenter and Tomasello. Child Development, 1: 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J. and Stuart, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 382–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santelmann, L., Berk, S., Austin, J., Somashekar, S. and Lust, B. (2002). Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no questions: dissociating movement and inflection. Journal of Child Language, 29: 813–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. and Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6(5): 557–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. and Tomasello, M. (2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: the persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 2: 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, G. and Plunkett, K. (1998). Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. Child Development, 69(2): 309–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schauwers, K., Govaerts, P. and Gillis, S. (2005). Language acquisition in deaf children with a cochlear implant. In Fletcher, P. and Miller, J. (eds.), Developmental Theory and Language Disorders (pp. 95–119). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. and Ochs, E. (1986). Language Socialization Across Cultures. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1988). The origin of relational categories. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M. and Braine, M. D. S. (eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition (pp. 121–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schütze, C. T. (2001). Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: a methodological note on Rispoli (1999). Journal of Child Language, 28(2): 507–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C. T. and Wexler, K. (1996). Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 670–81). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Schwartz, R. G. and Leonard, L. B. (1984). Words, objects and actions in early lexical acquisition. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 27(1): 119–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, D. R. (1982). Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71: 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidl, A. (2007). Infants' use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57: 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, A., Hollich, G. and Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). Early understanding of subject and object Wh-questions. Infancy, 4(3): 423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, A. (2003). Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development, 18: 511–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethuraman, N., Goldberg, A. and Goodman, J. (1997). Using the semantics associated with syntactic frames for interpretation without the aid of non-linguistic context. In Clark, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 283–94). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. C. (1974). The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in English. Bloomington: Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Sherman, J. C. and Lust, B. (1993). Children are in control. Cognition, 46(1): 1–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, R. and Moisan, A. (2008). Prosodic cues to noun and verb categories in infant-directed speech. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 450–61). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Shi, R., Cutler, A., Werker, J. and Cruickshank, M. (2006). Frequency and form as determinants of functor sensitivity in English-acquiring infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119: 61–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimpi, P. M., Gámez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J. and Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology, 43(6): 1334–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirai, Y., Slobin, D. I. and Weist, R. (1998). The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology. First Language, 18: 245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. and Slobin, D. I. (eds.), Studies of Child Language Development (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. R. (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (pp. 128–70). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions: beyond the individual mind. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 5: Expanding the Contexts (pp. 265–323). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2001). Form-function relations: How do children find out what they are? In Bowerman, M and Levinson, S (eds.). Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (pp. 406–49). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. B. (2000). Avoiding associations when it's behaviorism you really hate. In R. Golinkoff et al. (eds.), Becoming a Word Learner: A Debate on Lexical Acquisition (pp. 169–75). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. and Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3): 1558–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. (1974). Relative clause formation between 29–36 months: a preliminary report. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 8: 104–10.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973). The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Kemler Nelson, D. G. and Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2): 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soja, N. N., Carey, S. and Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38(2): 179–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokolov, J. L. (1988). Cue validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 15(1): 129–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solan, L. (1983). Pronominal Reference: Child Language and the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solan, Z., Horn, D., Ruppin, E. and Edelman, S. (2005). Unsupervised learning of natural languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(33): 11629–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorenson, J. M., Cooper, W. E. and Paccia, J. M (1978). Speech timing of grammatical categories. Cognition, 6: 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stager, C. L. and Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature, 388: 381–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stampe, D. (1979). A Dissertation on Natural Phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Steels, L. (2006). Experiments on the emergence of human communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8): 347–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steels, L. and Boer, B. (2007). Embodiment and self-organization of human categories: a case study for speech. In Zlatev, J., Ziemke, T., Frank, R. and Dirven, R. (eds.), Body, Language and Mind, vol. 1, pp. 241–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2008). Negative evidence and pre-emption: a constructional approach to ungrammaticality. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3): 513–31.Google Scholar
Street, J. A. and Dąbrowska, E. (2010). More individual differences in language attainment: how much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua, 120(8): 2080–94.
Streeter, L. A. (1976). Language perception of two-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature, 259: 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeter, L. A. (1978). Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64: 1582–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stromswold, K. (1990). Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sudhalter, V. and Braine, M. D. S. (1985). How does comprehension of passives develop – a comparison of actional and experiential verbs. Journal of Child Language, 12(2): 455–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, L. and Goldberg, A. E. (in press). The partial productivity of constructions as induction. Linguistics.
Suzman, S. M. (1999). Learn Zulu the way children do. South African Journal of African Languages, 19(2): 134–47.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. (1966). On Voice in the English Verb (Janua Linguarum, Series Practica 63). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Swingley, D. (2005a). Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary. Cognitive Psychology, 50: 86–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. (2005b). 11-months-olds' knowledge of how familiar words sound. Developmental Science, 8: 432–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, M. (1991). Children's interpretation of sentences containing every. In Maxfield, T. and Plunkett, B. (eds.), Papers in the Acquisition of WH: Proceedings of the UMass Roundtable, May 1990 (pp. 303–23). Linguistics Department, UMASS, Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Students Association.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan, S. S., et al. (1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science, 271(5245): 81–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: evidence from Mandarin speakers' early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32(3): 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavakolian, S. (1981). The conjoined clause analysis of relative clauses. In Tavakolian, S. (ed.), Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory (pp. 167–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Browne, K. (1983). Acquiring restrictions on forwards anaphora: a pilot study. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 9: 75–99.Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L. (2004). The role of entrenchment in children's and adults' performance on grammaticality judgement tasks. Cognitive Development, 19(1): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L. and Lieven, E. V. M. (2005). The acquisition of auxiliaries BE and HAVE: an elicitation study. Journal of Child Language, 32(3): 587–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L. and Rowland, C. F. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: Auxiliary BE. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52(6): 1449–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. and Rowland, C. F. (2001). The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. Journal of Child Language, 28(1): 127–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. and Rowland, C. F. (2002). Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’. Journal of Child Language, 29(4): 783–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. and Rowland, C. F. (2004). Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax. Journal of Child Language, 31(1): 61–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. and Rowland, C. F. (2005). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: BE and HAVE. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1): 247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. and Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46(4): 863–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiessen, E. D. and Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39: 706–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, S. A. and Mulac, A. (1991). The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15: 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. R. and Chapman, R. S. (1977). Who is daddy revisited – status of 2-year-olds' over-extended words in use and comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 4(3): 359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R. and Crain, S. (1994). Successful cyclic movement. In Hoekstra, T and Schwartz, B (eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 215–53). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. and Wexler, K. (1999). Principle B, VP Ellipsis and Interpretation in Child Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. (1958). The learning of song patterns by birds, with special reference to the song of the Chaffinch, ‘Fringilla coelebs’. Ibis, 100: 535–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thothathiri, M. and Snedeker, J. (2008). Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2): 188–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tincoff, R. (2001). Infants' attention to speech and non-speech vocalizations, and its relation to word-learning. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Tincoff, R. and Jusczyk, P. W. (1999). Some beginnings of word comprehension in 6-month-olds. Psychological Science, 10(2): 172–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74(3): 209–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2005). Beyond formalities: the case of language acquisition. The Linguistic Review, 22: 183–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2007a). The Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2007b). What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Commentary on Wunderlich. In Penke, M. and Rosenbach, Anette (eds.), What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? (pp. 175–78). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Abbot-Smith, K. (2002). A tale of two theories: response to Fisher. Cognition, 83(2): 207–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. and Akhtar, N. (1995). Two-year-olds use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. Cognitive Development, 10: 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Akhtar, N. (2000). Five questions for any theory of word learning. In Golinkoff, R. and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (eds.), Becoming a Word Learner: A Debate on Lexical Acquisition (pp. 115–35). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Barton, M. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30(5): 639–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Brooks, P. J. (1998). Young children's earliest transitive and intransitive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(4): 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Haberl, K. (2003). Understanding attention: 12 and 18 month olds know what is new for other persons. Developmental Psychology, 39(5): 906–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. and Kruger, A. C. (1992). Joint attention on actions – acquiring verbs in ostensive and non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language, 19(2): 311–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. and Stahl, D. (2004). Sampling children's spontaneous speech: how much is enough? Journal of Child Language, 31(1): 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Akhtar, N., Dodson, K. and Rekau, L. (1997). Differential productivity in young children's use of nouns and verbs. Journal of Child Language, 24: 373–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Brooks, P. J. and Stern, E. (1998). Learning to produce passive utterances through discourse. First Language, 18: 223–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Strosberg, R. and Akhtar, N. (1996). Eighteen-month-old children learn words in non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language, 23(1): 157–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, D. J. and Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trehub, S. E. (1973). Infants' sensitivity to vowel and tonal contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 9: 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trehub, S. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 47(2): 466–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M. and Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2): 89–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1): 37–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vainikka, A. (1994). Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition, 3: 257–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition, 40: 21–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valian, V., Solt, S. and Stewart, J. (2009). Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae? The case of children's determiners. Journal of Child Language, 36(4): 743–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lely, H. K. J. (1997). Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: modularity and innateness. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10(2–3): 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginneken, J. (1917). De roman van een kleuter (A Toddler's Novel). Nijmegen: Malmberg.Google Scholar
Hoek, K. (1997). Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Copp, A. and Mishkin, M. (2005). FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6: 131–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargha-Khadem, F., Watkins, K., Alcock, K., Fletcher, P. and Passingham, R. (1995). Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92: 930–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1996). Phonological Development: The Origins of Language in the Child. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. and Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45: 683–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. and Velleman, S. L. (2000). The construction of a first phonology. Phonetica, 57: 255–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vihman, M., Macken, M., Miller, R., Simmons, H. and Miller, J. (1985). From babbling to speech: a re-assessment of the continuity issue. Language, 61(2): 397–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. and Hall, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50: 336–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanner, E. and Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. and Miller, G. (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality (pp. 119–61). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wason, P. (1966). Reasoning. In New Horizons in Psychology (pp. 135–51). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Waterson, N. (1971). Child phonology: a prosodic view. Journal of Linguistics, 7: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterson, N. (1979). The growth of complexity in phonological development. In Waterson, N. and Snow, C. (eds.), The Development of Communication (pp. 415–42). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R. and Booth, A., E. (2000). Principles that are invoked in the acquisition of words, but not facts. Cognition, B33–B43.CrossRef
Waxman, S. R. and Booth, A., , E (2001). On the insufficiency of evidence for a domain-general account of word learning. Cognition, 277–79.CrossRef
Waxman, S. R. and Braun, I. E. (2005). Consistent (but not variable) names as invitations to form object categories: new evidence from 12-month-old infants. Cognition, 95: B59–B68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M. and Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34(6): 1289–1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F. and Tees, R. C. (1983). Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37: 278–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J.F. and Tees, R.C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M. and Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants' ability to learn phonetically similar words: effects of age and vocabulary. Infancy, 3: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106(1–4): 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K., Schütze, C. T. and Rice, M. (1998). Subject case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: evidence for the Agr/Tns Omission Model. Language Acquisition, 7(2–4): 317–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wightman, C., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M. and Price, P. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91: 1707–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willems, R. M. and Hagoort, P. (2007). Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture and action: a review. Brain and Language, 101: 278–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, S. (2003). Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language, 30: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1): 103–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology, 56(3): 165–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. and Markman, E. M. (1998). Early word learning. In Damon, W., Kuhn, D. and Seigler, R. (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. 2: Cognition, Perception and Language (pp. 371–420). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D. (2007). Why assume UG? In M. Penke and A. Rosenbach (eds.), What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? (pp. 147–74). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, C. (2004). Universal Grammar, statistics or both?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 451–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamuner, T. S. (2003). Input-based Phonological Acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Ben Ambridge, University of Liverpool, Elena V. M. Lieven, University of Manchester
  • Book: Child Language Acquisition
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975073.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Ben Ambridge, University of Liverpool, Elena V. M. Lieven, University of Manchester
  • Book: Child Language Acquisition
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975073.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Ben Ambridge, University of Liverpool, Elena V. M. Lieven, University of Manchester
  • Book: Child Language Acquisition
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975073.012
Available formats
×