Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-598jt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-27T21:53:31.498Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Part IV - Reducing dishonesty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Edited by
Jan-Willem van Prooijen  and
Paul A. M. van Lange
Jan-Willem van Prooijen
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
Paul A. M. van Lange
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
The Roots of Dishonesty
 , pp. 231 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

References

Ahmed, A. M., & Salas, O. (2011). Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40 (3), 242–246.
Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–48.
Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
Aveyard, M. E. (2014). A call to honesty: Extending religious priming of moral behavior to Middle Eastern Muslims. PloS One, 9(7), e99447.
Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 29–45.
Batson, C. D., Naifeh, S. J., & Pate, S. (1978). Social desirability, religious orientation, and racial prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 31–41.
Becker, E. (2007). The denial of death. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Burris, C. T., & Navara, G. S. (2002). Morality play or playing morality?: Intrinsic religious orientation and socially desirable responding. Self and Identity, 1(1), 67–76.
Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.
Desmond, S. A., & Kraus, R. (2012). Liar, liar: Adolescent religiosity and lying to parents. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 8, 1–26.
Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.
Duhaime, E. (2014). Did religion facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperative societies? Unpublished master’s thesis.
Edelman, B.G. (2009). Red light states: Who buys online adult entertainment? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1):209–220.
Faith in flux: Changes in religious affiliation in the US. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2009. www.pewforum.org/2009/04/27/faith-in-flux/.
Francis, L. J., & Stubbs, M. T. (1987). Measuring attitudes towards Christianity: From childhood into adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 741–743.
Gervais, W. M. (2014). Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists. PloS one, 9(4), e92302.
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A.F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Trust and anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206.
Gillings, V., & Joseph, S. (1996). Religiosity and social desirability: Impression management and self-deceptive positivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 1047–1050.
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150.
Halevy, R., Shalvi, S., & Verschuere, B. (2014). Being honest about dishonesty: Correlating self‐reports and actual lying. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 54–72.
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol 1: Studies in deceit. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Heaven, P. C., & Ciarrochi, J. (2007). Personality and religious values among adolescents: A three‐wave longitudinal analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 681–694.
Hepper, E. G., Gramzow, R. H., & Sedikides, C. (2010). Individual differences in self‐enhancement and self‐protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of personality, 78, 781–814.
Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385–392.
Kramer, S. R., & Shariff, A. F. (2015). Religious prosociality: A meta-analysis. Manuscript in preparation.
Leak, G. K., & Fish, S. (1989). Religious orientation, impression management, and self-deception: Toward a clarification of the link between religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 355–359.
Malhotra, D. K. (2010). (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the ‘Sunday Effect’ on pro-social behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 138–143.
McCullough, M. E., Enders, C. K., Brion, S. L., & Jain, A. R. (2005). The varieties of religious development in adulthood: A longitudinal investigation of religion and rational choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 78–89.
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (in press). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Paloutzian, R. F., Richardson, J. T., & Rambo, L. R. (1999). Religious conversion and personality change. Journal of Personality, 67, 1047–1079.
Paul, G. S. (2005). Cross-national correlations of quantifiable societal health with popular religiosity and secularism in the prosperous democracies. Journal of Religion & Society, 1, 7.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 383–388.
Pichon, I., Boccato, G., & Saroglou, V. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045.
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: The decline of violence in history and its causes. London, England: Penguin.
Randolph-Seng, B., & Nielsen, M. E. (2007) Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 303–315.
Richards, P. S. (1994). Religious devoutness, impression management, and personality functioning in college students. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 14–26.
Rodriguez, L. M., Neighbors, C., & Foster, D. W. (2013, April 25). Priming effects of self-reported drinking and religiosity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1–8.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17–36.
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116.
Shariff, A. F. (2011). Big gods are made for big groups: Commentary on Murray & Schloss. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1, 89–93.
Shariff, A. F., & Aknin, L. B. (2014). The emotional toll of Hell: Cross-national and experimental evidence for the negative well-being effects of Hell beliefs. PLoS One, 9(1), e85251.
Shariff, A. F., & Clark, B. A. M. (2015). Any God is better than no God: Belief in God is a more powerful cue of trust than religious affiliation. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Supernatural agent concepts increase prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.
Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). Divergent effects of heaven and hell beliefs on national crime. PLoS One, 7(6), e39048.
Shariff, A. F., Willard, A., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2015). Priming God: A meta-analysis of religious priming with a focus on religious prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 1–22.
Storch, E. A., & Storch, J. B. (2001). Organizational, nonorganizational, and intrinsic religiosity and academic dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 88, 548–552.
Tan, J. H., & Vogel, C. (2008). Religion and trust: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 832–848.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.
Triandis, H. C. (2011). Culture and self-deception: A theoretical perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39(1), 3–13.
Trimble, D. E. (1997). The religious orientation scale: Review and meta-analysis of social desirability effects. Educational Psychology Measures, 57, 970–986.
Vail, K. E., Arndt, J., & Abdollahi, A. (2012). Exploring the existential function of religion and supernatural agent beliefs among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1288–1300.
Watson, P. J., Morris, R. J., Foster, J. E., & Hood, R. W. Jr (1986). Religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25, 215–232.
Wink, P., Ciciolla, L., Dillon, M., & Tracy, A. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and personality: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 75, 1051–1070.

References

Abrahamson, E., & Freedman, D. H. (2007). A perfect mess: The hidden benefits of disorder. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
Altman, I., Taylor, D. A., & Wheeler, L. (1971). Ecological aspects of group behavior in social isolation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 76–100.
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality traits and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23, 764–771.
Banerjee, P., Chatterjee, P., & Sinha, J. (2012). Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23, 407–409.
Baum, A., & Weiss, L. (1987). Social density and perceived control as mediators of crowding stress in high-density residential neighborhoods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 899.
Beaussart, M. L., Andrews, C. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creative liars: The relationship between creativity and integrity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 129–134.
Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 102, 994–1014.
Bohns, V. K., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012). It hurts when I do this (or you do that): Posture and pain tolerance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 341–345.
Boles, T. L., Croson, R. T. A., & Murnighan, J. K. (2000). Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 235–259.
Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363–1368.
Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2015). Review and summary of research on the embodied effects of nonverbal expansiveness. Psychological Science, 26, 657–663.
Carney, D. R., Hall, J. A., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 105–123.
Chen, Y., Peterson, R., Phillips, D., Podolny, J., & Ridgeway, C. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Bringing status to the table – Attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23, 299–307.
Chu, S., & Downes, J. J. (2000). Long live Proust: The odour-cued autobiographical memory bump. Cognition, 75, B41–B50.
Cramwinckel, F. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! The effects of touching dirty objects on rewarding unethical subordinates as a function of a leader’s self-interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 93–100.
Crank, J. P. (2003). Crime and justice in the context of resource scarcity. Crime, Law and Social Change, 39, 39–67.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2003). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Wilmuth, C., Yap, A. J., & Carney, D. R. (2015). Preparatory power posing affects job interview performance. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 100, 1286–1295.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York, NY: Grosset/Putnam.
Darwin, C. (1872/1904). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Murray (Original work published 1872).
de Waal, F. (1998). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. A., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681–689.
Doleac, J. L., & Sanders, N. J. (2013). Under the cover of darkness: How ambient light influences criminal activity. Working paper. Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia.
Doop, M., Mohr, C., Folley, B., Brewer, W., & Park, S. (2006). Olfaction and memory. In Brewer, W., Castle, D., & Pantelis, C. (Eds.), Olfaction and the brain (pp. 65–82). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The accentuation bias: Money literally looms larger (and sometime smaller) to the powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 199–205.
Duguid, M. M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). Living large: The powerful overestimate their own height. Psychological Science, 23, 36–40.
Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 391–394.
Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group.. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382–389.
Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123–1137.
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074.
Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2013). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445–459.
Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 142–155.
Gollwitzer, M., & Melzer, A. (2012). Macbeth and the joystick: Evidence for moral cleansing after playing a violent video game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1356–1360.
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52.
Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985–1003.
Greenberg, J., & Scott, K. S. (1996). Why do workers bite the hands that feed them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 111–155). Greenwich: CT JAI Press.
Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.
Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & Smith LeBeau, L. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.
Harries, K. (2006). Property crimes and violence in United States: An analysis of the influence of population density. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 1, 24–34.
Helzer, Erik G., & Pizarro, David A. (2011). Dirty liberals!: Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22, 517–522.
Hirsh, J. B., Galinsky, A. D., & Zhong, C. B. (2011). Drunk, powerful, and in the dark: How general processes of disinhibition produce both prosocial and antisocial behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 415–427.
Hirshleifer, D., & Shumway, T. (2003). Good day sunshine: Stock returns and the weather. Journal of Finance, 58, 1009–1032.
Holland, R. W., Hendriks, M., & Aarts, H. (2005). Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychological Science, 16, 689–693.
Hsieh, C. C., & Pugh, M. D. (1993). Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: A meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies. Criminal Justice Review, 18, 182–202.
Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science, 22, 95–102.
Inesi, M. E. (2010). Power and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 58–69.
Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F., & Donnellan, M. B. (2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgements? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 209–215.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (2009). Creating a larger role for environmental psychology: The reasonable person model as an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 329–339.
Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Auditing, 20, 45–63.
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681–1685.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
Knight, A. P., & Baer, M. (2014). Get up, stand up: The effects of a non-sedentary workspace on information elaboration and group performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 910–917.
Knight, C., & Haslam, S. A. (2010). The relative merits of lean, enriched, and empowered offices: An experimental examination of the impact of workspace management strategies on well-being and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 158–172.
Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 53–61.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737–744.
Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191–1197.
Landau, M. J., Meier, B., & Keefer, L. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067.
Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423–1425.
Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N. (2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleansing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 307–311.
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381–383.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158–186.
Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494–498.
McCallum, R., Rusbult, C. E., Hong, G. K., Walden, T. A., & Schopler, J. (1979). Effects of resource availability and importance of behavior on the experience of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1304–1313.
Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.
Nolan, J. J. III (2004). Establishing the statistical relationship between population size and UCR crime rate: Its impact and implications. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 547–555.
Page, R. A., & Moss, M. K. (1976). Environmental influences on aggression: The effects of darkness and proximity of victim. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 126–133.
Park, L. E., Streamer, L., Huang, L., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Stand tall, but don’t put your feet up: Universal and culturally-specific effects of expansive postures on power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 965–971.
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771–784.
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Cote, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4086–4091.
Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Compliant sinners, obstinate saints: How power and self-focus determine the effectiveness of (un)ethical social influences. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 636–658.
Ranehill, E., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Leiberg, S., Sul, S., & Weber, R. (2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effects on hormones and risk taking in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26, 653–656.
Rotton, J. (1983). Affective and cognitive consequences of malodorous pollution. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38, 213–228.
Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41.
Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.
Schultz, J. J., Johnson, D. A. Jr, Morris, D., & Dyrnes, S. (1993). An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 75–103.
Singer, J., Brush, C., & Lublin, S. (1965). Some aspects of deindividuation: Identification and conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 356–378.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558–568.
van den Bos, K., Van Lange, P. A. M., Lind, E. A., Venhoeven, L. A., Beudeker, D. A., Cramwinckel, F. M., … Van der Laan, J. (2011). On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: Because of the prosocial nature of people behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 791–811.
van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Lowe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315–1322.
Vohs, K. D., Redden, J. P., & Rahinel, R. (2013). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological Science, 24, 1714–1721.
Weisfeld, G. E., & Beresford, J. M. (1982). Erectness of posture as an indicator of dominance or success in humans. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 113–129.
Werner, C. M., Altman, I., & Brown, B. B. (1992). A transactional approach to interpersonal relations: Physical environment, social context and temporal qualities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 297.
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784.
Willer, R., Youngreen, R., Troyer, L., & Lovaglia, M. (2012). How do the powerful attain status? The roots of legitimate power inequalities. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33, 355–367.
Yap, A. J., Mason, M. F., & Ames, D. R. (2013). The powerful size others down: The link between power and estimates of others’ size. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 591–594.
Yap, A. J., Wazlawek, A. S., Lucas, B. J., Cuddy, A. C., & Carney, D. R. (2013). The ergonomics of dishonesty: The effect of incidental posture on stealing, cheating, and traffic violations. Psychological Science, 24, 2281–2289.
Zhong, C. B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 311–314.
Zhong, C. B., & House, J. (2012). Hawthorne revisited: Organizational implications of the physical work environment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 3–22.
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.
Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859–862.

References

Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral Study of Obedience.” American Psychologist, 19, 421–423.
Bocchiaro, P., & Zimbardo, P. (under review). On the dynamics of “productive disobedience”: Experimental investigations of defying unjust authority.
Bocchiaro, P., Zimbardo, P. G., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2012). To defy or not to defy: An experimental study of the dynamics of disobedience and whistle-blowing. Social Influence, 7, 35–50.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1–11.
Cheetham, M., Pedroni, A. F., Antley, A., Slater, M., & Jäncke, L. (2009). Virtual Milgram: Empathic concern or personal distress? Evidence from functional MRI and dispositional measures. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1–13.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dambrun, M., & Vatiné, E. (2010). Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 760–773.
Fromm, E. (1963). Disobedience as a psychological and moral problem. In Urquhart, C. (Ed.), A matter of life (pp. 97–105). London: Jonathan Cape.
Giampaglia, G., & Roccato, M. (2002). La scala di autoritarismo di destra di Altemeyer: Un’analisi con il modello di Rasch per la costruzione di una versione italiana [The Altemeyer’s right-wing authoritarianism scale: An analysis using Rasch model for the construction of an Italian version]. TPM, 9, 93–111.
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 215–241.
Kimmel, A. J. (2007). Ethical issues in behavioral research: Basic and applied perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.
Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 127–134.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Mixon, D. (1972). Instead of deception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 2, 145–177.
Monin, B, Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 76–93.
Packer, D. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 301–304.
Pozzi, M., Fattori, F., Bocchiaro, P., & Alfieri, S. (2014). Do the right thing! A study on social representation of obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 18–27.
Pruitt, D. G. (1998). Social conflict. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 470–503). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.
Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., … Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE, 1, e39.
Zeigler-Hill, V., Southard, A. C., Archer, L. M., & Donohoe, P. L. (2013). Neuroticism and negative affect influence the reluctance to engage in destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 161–174.

References

References marked with an asterisk refer to studies included in the meta-analysis.

Ansarra, R., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Hines, A., Fleck, R., Cole, L., & Belarde, D. (2011). Augmenting ACID with affective details to assess credibility. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 3, 141–158. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_11.
Bagley, J., & Manelis, L. (1979). Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 591–594.
Beattie, G. W. (1981). A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 243–248. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00493.x.
Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679. Doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.5.669.
Bembibre, J., & Higueras, L. (2011). Differential effectiveness of the cognitive interview in a simulation of a testimony. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 17, 473–489. Doi 10.1080/10683160903321540.
Bembibre, J., & Higueras, L. (2012). Comparative analysis of true and false statements with the source monitoring model and the cognitive interview: Special features of the false accusation of innocent people. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 913–928. Doi 10.1080/1068316X.2011.589387.
Berthold, A., & Jameson, A. (1999). Interpreting symptoms of cognitive load in speech input. In Kay, J. (Ed.), User modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, UM99, Vienna. New York: Springer Wien New York.
Bull, R. (2010). The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 5–24. Doi: 10.1348/014466509X440160.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colwell, K., Hiscock, C. K., & Memon, A. (2002). Interview techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287–300. Doi: 10.1002/acp.788.
Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J. (2007). Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4, 167–180. Doi 10.1002/jip.73.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., & Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement of visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38, 438–445. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.38.3.438.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory and Cognition, 33, 727–733. doi:10.3758/BF03195338.
Ekman, P. (1997). Deception, lying, and demeanor. In Halpern, D. F. & Voiskounsky, A. E. (Eds.), States of mind: American and post-Soviet perspectives on contemporary issues in psychology (pp. 93–105). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374.
Fisher, R. P. (2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 25–38 Doi: 10.1348/135532509X441891.
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques in investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
Fisher, R., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 16–19. Doi: 10.1177/0963721410396826.
Geiselman, R. E., & Callot, R. (1990). Reverse and forward order recall of script based text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141–144. doi 10.1002/acp.2350040.
Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 723–739. Doi: 10.1002/acp.1232.
Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., & Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 651–658. Doi: 10.3758/BF03211385.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Doubleday.
Granhag, P. A., Andersson, L. O., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals’ beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103–119. doi/10.1348/135532504322776889.
Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200. Doi: 10.1080/10683160701645181.
Granhag, P. A., & Knieps, M. (2011). Episodic future thought: Illuminating the trademarks of forming true and false intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 274–280. Doi 10.1002/acp1674.
Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Jonsson, A. C. (2003). Partners in crime: How liars in collusion betray themselves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 848–868. Doi: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.2003.tb01928.x.
Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L. A., Willén, R., & Hartwig, M. (2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 341–355. doi. 10.1111/j.2044–8333.2012.02047.x.
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 213–227. Doi: 10/10683160600750264.
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619. Doi: org/10.1007/s10979-006-9053-9.
Hernandez-Fernaud, E., & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1997). The cognitive interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55–68. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099–0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G.
Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61, 760–771. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760.
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376. Doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371.
Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associate retrieval processes in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 24, 103–109. Doi: 10.3758/BF03197276.
Knieps, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2013a). Back to the future: Asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147, 619–640.
Knieps, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2013b). Repeated visits to the future: Asking about mental images to discriminate between true and false intentions. International Journal of Advances in Psychology, 2, 93–102.
Köhnken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. In Semin, G. R. & Fiedler, K. (Eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 257–282). London, Great Britain: Sage Publications.
Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement Validity Analysis and the “detection of the truth.” In Granhag, P. A. & Strömwall, L. A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 41–63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–59.
Lancaster, G. L. J., Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Waller, B. (2012). Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: The benefits of asking unanticipated questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 107–114. Doi: 10.1002/acp.2879.
Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., Vernham, Z., & Fisher, R. (2015). You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 129–146. Doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12017.
Leins, D., Fisher, R., & Vrij, A. (2012). Drawing on liars’ lack of cognitive flexibility: Detecting deception through varying report modes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 601–607. Doi 10.1002/acp.2837.
Leins, D., Fisher, R. P., Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Mann, S. (2011). Using sketch-drawing to induce inconsistency in liars. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 253–265. Doi 10.1348/135532510X501775.
Mann, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Warmelink, L., & Forrester, D. (2012). Windows to the soul? Deliberate eye contact as a cue to deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36, 205–215. Doi: 10.1007/s10919-012-0132-y.
Mann, S., Vrij, A., Shaw, D., Leal, S., Ewans, S., Hillman, J., Granhag, P. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2013). Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 324–340. Doi 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02055.x.
Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 16, 340–372. Doi:10.1037/a0020518.
Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? SCAN as a lie detection tool. Law & Human Behavior, 36, 68–76. Doi: 10.1007/s10979-011-9264-6.
Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171. Doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000123.
Roos af Hjelmsäter, E., Öhman, L., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2014). Mapping deception in adolescents: Eliciting cues to deceit through an unanticipated spatial drawing task. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 179–188. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02068.x.
Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. (1994). Supervisory control of action and thought selection. In Weiskrantz, L., Baddeley, A., & Alan, D. (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 171–187). New York: Clarendon Press.
Shaw, D. J, Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Hillman, J. (2013). Expect the unexpected? Variations in question type elicit cues to deception in joint interviewer contexts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 336–343. Doi: 10.1002/acp.2911.
Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Knieps, M., & Vrij, A. (2013). True and false intentions: Asking about the past to detect lies about the future. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 19, 673–685. Doi 10.1080/1068316x.2013.793333.
Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., & Hughes, C. J. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1755–1762. Doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1555.
Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In Raskin, D. C. (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Suckle-Nelson, J. A., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Florence, S., Youschak, K. E., & Duarte, A. (2010). Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): Replication and gender differences. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 23–30.
Tedeschini, J. (2012). Overcoming roadblocks to reform. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 134–135. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.008.
Vredeveldt, A., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2011). Eye closure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualisation. Memory and Cognition, 39, 1253–1263. Doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0098-8.
Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41. Doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3.
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, second edition. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Vrij, A. (2014). Interviewing to detect deception. European Psychologist, 19, 184–195. Doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000201.
Vrij, A. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection. In Granhag, P. A., Vrij, A., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches (pp. 205–229). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142. Doi: org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003.
Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 110–117. doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.
Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Towards a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 28–32. Doi: 10.1177/0963721410391245.
Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. B. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. Doi: 10.1177/1529100610390861.
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159–166. Doi 10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y.
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2011). A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: Verbal cues and detection accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 212–218. Doi 10.1002/acp.1665.
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 579–594. Doi 10.1080/10683160902776843.
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Warmelink, L., Granhag, P. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2010). Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 587–594. Doi: 10.1002/acp/1627.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265. Doi 10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2010). “Look into my eyes”: Can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? Psychology, Crime, & Law, 16, 327–348. doi 10.1080/10683160902776843.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Is anyone out there? Drawings as a tool to detect deception in occupations interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 377–388. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2010.498422.
Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Jundi, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Have you been there before? The effect of experience and question expectedness on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica, 141, 178–183. doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011.
Zimmerman, L. A., Veinott, E. S., Meissner, C. M., Fallon, C., & Mueller, S. T. (2010). Field Training and Testing of Interview and Elicitation Methods (Final Report prepared under Contract W91CRB-09-C-0082 for US ARMY REDCOM Acquisition Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD). Fairborn, OH: Klein Associates Division of Applied Research Associates.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×