Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-md2j5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T01:11:19.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2022

William A. Bauer
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anandan, Jeeva and Brown, Harvey R. (1995) On the Reality of Spacetime Structure and the Wavefunction. Foundations of Physics 25(2): 349360.Google Scholar
Anjum, Rani Lill, Lie, Svein Anders Noer, and Mumford, Stephen (2013) Dispositions and Ethics. In Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 231247. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anjum, Rani Lill and Mumford, Stephen (2018) What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1965) The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature. In Butler, Ronald J., (Ed.), Analytical Philosophy: Second Series, pp. 158180. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger (2014) Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1941a) Metaphysics. In McKeon, Richard (Ed.) and W. D. Ross (Trans.), The Basic Works of Aristotle, pp. 689-926. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1941b) Physics. In McKeon, Richard (Ed.) and W. D. Ross (Trans.), The Basic Works of Aristotle, pp. 218-394. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1978) A Theory of Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1983) What Is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1989) Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1993) The Identification Problem and the Inference Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53(2): 421422.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1997) A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (2002) Two Problems for Essentialism: Appendix in Brian Ellis, The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism, pp. 167171. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (2005) Four Disputes about Properties. Synthese 144(3): 309320.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (2010) Sketch for a Systematic Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Azzano, Lorenzo (2019) The Question of Realism for Powers. Synthese 196(1): 329354.Google Scholar
Baez, John C. (2001) Higher-dimensional Algebra and Planck-scale Physics. In Callender, Craig and Huggett, Nick (Eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck-scale: Contemporary Theories in Quantum Gravity, pp. 177195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Lynn Rudder (2009) Review of Mark Johnston’s Saving God: Religion without Idolatry. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Notre Dame, IN: Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/saving-god-religion-after-idolatry/Google Scholar
Balashov, Yuri (2022) Dispositionalism, Causation, and the Interaction Gap. Erkenntnis 87(2): 677692.Google Scholar
Baltimore, Joseph (2022) Dispositionalism, Causation, and the Interaction Gap. Erkenntnis 87(2): 677692.Google Scholar
Barker, Stephen (2013) The Emperor’s New Metaphysics of Powers. Mind 122(487): 605653.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (2000) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1972.)Google Scholar
Bauer, William A. (2011) An Argument for the Extrinsic Grounding of Mass. Erkenntnis, 74(1): 8199.Google Scholar
Bauer, William A. (2012) Four Theories of Pure Dispositions. In Bird, Alexander, Ellis, Brian, and Sankey, Howard (Eds.), Properties, Powers and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism, pp. 139162. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauer, William A. (2013) Dispositional Essentialism and the Nature of Powerful Properties. Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy, 5(35): 1–19.Google Scholar
Bauer, William A. (2015) Why Science Needs Philosophy. Life as a Human. May 17, 2015. https://lifeasahuman.com/2015/mind-spirit/philosophy/why-science-needs-philosophy/Google Scholar
Bauer, William A. (2016) Physical Intentionality, Extrinsicness, and the Direction of Causation. Acta Analytica 31(4): 397417.Google Scholar
Bauer, William A. (2019) Powers and the Pantheistic Problem of Unity. Sophia 58(4): 563580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Karen (2011) Construction Area (No Hard Hat Required). Philosophical Studies 154(1): 79–104.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (1998) Dispositions and Antidotes. The Philosophical Quarterly 48(191): 227–34.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2005) The Ultimate Argument against Armstrong’s Contingent Necessitation View of Laws. Analysis 65(2): 147155.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2007a) Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2007b) The Regress of Pure Powers? The Philosophical Quarterly 57(229): 513534.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2013) Limitations of Power. In Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 1547. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2017) Manifesting Time and Space: Background-Free Physical Theories. In Jacobs, Jonathan D. (Ed.), Causal Powers, pp. 127138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2020) A Dispositional Account of Causation, with Some Remarks on the Ontology of Dispositions. In Sophie Meincke, Anne (Ed.), Dispositionalism: Perspectives from Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 417 of Synthese Library, pp. 151170. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander, Ellis, Brian, and Sankey, Howard (2012) Properties, Powers and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon (1990) Filling in Space. Analysis 50(2): 6265.Google Scholar
Borghini, Andrea (2009) Dispositions and Their Intentions. In Damschen, Gregor, Schnepf, Robert, and Stüber, Karsten (Eds.), Debating Dispositions: Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind, pp. 204219. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Borghini, Andrea and Williams, Neil E. (2008) A Dispositional Theory of Possibility. Dialectica 62(1): 2141.Google Scholar
Bostock, Simon (2003) Are All Possible Laws Actual Laws? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81(4): 517533.Google Scholar
Bostock, Simon (2008) In Defence of Pan-Dispositionalism. Metaphysica 9(2): 139157.Google Scholar
Bourget, David and Chalmers, David J. (2014) What Do Philosophers Believe? Philosophical Studies 170(3): 465500.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz (1911) Appendix to The Classification of Mental Phenomena. In Franz Brentano (2015) Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, pp. 281320. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz (1966) The True and the Evident. Oskar Kraus (Ed.), Roderick M. Chisholm (Ed., English Edition), Roderick M. Chisholm, Ilse Politzer, and Kurt R. Fischer (Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Translated from the German, Wahreit und Evidenz, 1930.)Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz (2015) Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. New York: Routledge (Originally published in 1874.)Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1925) The Mind and Its Place in Nature. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
Brogaard, Berit (2016) In Search of Mentons: Panpsychism, Physicalism, and the Missing Link. In Godehard Brüntrup and Ludwig Jaskolla (Eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 130-152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Harvey R. and Pooley, Oliver (2006) Minkowski Space-Time: A Glorious Non-entity. In Dieks, Dennis (Ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime, pp. 6789. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brüntrup, Godehard and Jaskolla, Ludwig (2016) Introduction. In Brüntrup, Godehard and Jaskolla, Ludwig (Eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buckareff, Andrei and Nagasawa, Yujin (2016) Introduction: Alternative Conceptions of Divinity and Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion. In Buckareff, Andrei and Nagasawa, Yujin (Eds.), Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, pp. 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, Craig (2011) Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics. In French, Steven and Saatsi, Juha (Eds.), Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science, pp. 3354. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth (2018) Why Maps Are Not Propositional. In Grzankowski, Alex and Montague, Michelle (Eds.), Non-Propositional Intentionality, pp. 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Keith (1981) The Metaphysics of Abstract Particulars. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6(1): 477488.Google Scholar
Campbell, Keith (1990) Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1958) Introduction to Symbolic Logic and Its Applications. Mineola, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Carroll, John (1994) Laws of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, John (2008) Nailed to Hume’s Cross? In Sider, Theodore, Hawthorne, John, and Zimmerman, Dean W. (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, pp. 6781. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (2017) Causal Powers: Why Humeans Can’t Even Be Instrumentalists. In Jacobs, Jonathan D. (Ed.), Causal Powers, pp. 9–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy and Pemberton, John (2013) Aristotelian Powers: Without Them, What Would Modern Science Do? In Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 93–112. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. (2006) Strong and Weak Emergence. In Clayton, Philip and Davies, Paul (Eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion, pp. 244254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. (2016) Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism. In Brüntrup, Godehard and Jaskolla, Ludwig (Eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 1947. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick (1957) Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Sungho (2006) The Simple vs. Reformed Conditional Analysis of Dispositions. Synthese 148(2): 369379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Sungho (2008) Dispositional Properties and Counterfactual Conditionals. Mind 117(468): 795841.Google Scholar
Choi, Sungho and Fara, Michael (2018) Dispositions. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dispositions/.Google Scholar
Christensen, Wayne David and Hooker, Cliff A. (2001) Self-directed Agents. In McIntosh, Jillian Scott (Ed.), Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 27: Naturalism, Evolution, and Intentionality, pp. 1952. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy and Chalmers, David J. (1998) The Extended Mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19.Google Scholar
Coates, Ashley (2021) Making sense of powerful qualities. Synthese. 198(9): 83478363.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02576-5Google Scholar
Collier, John (1990) Intrinsic Information. In Hanson, Philip P. (Ed.), Information, Language, and Cognition (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Volume 1), pp. 390409. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Collier, John (2008) Information in Biological Systems. In Adriaans, Pieter and van Benthem, Johan (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophy of Science, Volume 8: Philosophy of Information, pp. 763787. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Copeland, B. Jack (2020) The Church-Turing Thesis. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/church-turing/Google Scholar
Corry, Richard (2019) Power and Influence: The Metaphysics of Reductive Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, Troy (2012) Goodbye, Humean Supervenience. In Bennett, Karen and Zimmerman, Dean. W. (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Volume 7, pp. 129153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1987) Knowing One’s Own Mind. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60(3): 441–58.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul (2010) Universe from Bit. In Davies, Paul and Gregersen, Niels Henrik (Eds.), Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics, pp. 83–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul and Gregersen, Niels Henrik (2010) Introduction: Does Information Matter? In Davies, Paul and Gregersen, Niels Henrik (Eds.), Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics, pp. 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demarest, Heather (2012) Do Counterfactuals Ground the Laws of Nature? A Critique of Lange. Philosophy of Science 79(3): 333344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. (2016) Being as Communion: A Metaphysics of Information. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1987) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1985) Principles of Philosophy. In John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch (Trans.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume I, pp. 177-292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1644.)Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles (1899) A Tale of Two Cities. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Djedovic, Alex (2020) From Life-Like to Mind-Like Explanation: Natural Agency and the Cognitive Sciences. University of Toronto, PhD Dissertation. ProQuest. www.proquest.com/docview/2467622332Google Scholar
Dorato, Mauro (2005) The Software of the Universe: An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Laws of Nature. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dorato, Mauro (2007) Dispositions, Relational Properties and the Quantum World. In Kistler, Max and Gnassounou, Bruno (Eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers, pp. 249270. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dorato, Mauro and Esfeld, Michael (2010) GRW as an Ontology of Dispositions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41(1): 4149.Google Scholar
Doyle, Tsarina (2018) Nietzsche's Metaphysics of the Will to Power: The Possibility of Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I. (1977) Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science 44(2): 248268.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I. (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dumsday, Travis (2019) Dispositionalism and the Metaphysics of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeucht, Andrzej, Harju, Tero, Petre, Ion, Prescott, David M., and Rozenberg, Grzegorz (2004) Computation in Living Cells: Gene Assembly in Ciliates. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave (2010) The Causal Powers of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian (2001) Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian (2002) The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian (2010a) Causal Powers and Categorical Properties. In Marmodoro, Anna (Ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, pp. 133142. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian (2010b) The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian (2012) The Categorical Dimensions of the Causal Powers. In Bird, Alexander, Ellis, Brian, and Sankey, Howard (Eds.), Properties, Powers and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism, pp. 1126. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian (2013) The Power of Agency. In Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 186206. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian and Lierse, Caroline (1994) Dispositional Essentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72(1): 2745.Google Scholar
Esfeld, Michael (1998) Holism and Analytic Philosophy. Mind 107(426): 365380.Google Scholar
Esfeld, Michael and Deckert, Dirk-Andre (2018) A Minimalist Ontology of the Natural World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fara, Michael (2005) Dispositions and Habituals. Noûs 39(1): 4382.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit (2005) Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2008) Nano-Intentionality: A Defense of Intrinsic Intentionality. Biology and Philosophy 23(2): 157177.Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano (2009) Philosophical Conceptions of Information. In Sommaruga, Giovanni (Ed.), Formal Theories of Information, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1353. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano (2010) Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano (2011) The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamez, David (2018) Human and Machine Consciousness. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. DOI: 10.11647/OBP.0107Google Scholar
Gozzano, Simone (2020) The Dispositional Nature of Phenomenal Properties. Topoi 39(5): 10451055.Google Scholar
Giannotti, Joaquim (2021) The Identity Theory of Powers Revised. Erkenntnis 86(3): 603621.Google Scholar
Gillett, Carl (2002) The Dimensions of Realization: A Critique of the Standard View. Analysis 62(4): 316323.Google Scholar
Goff, Philip (2016) The Phenomenal Bonding Solution to the Combination Problem. In Brüntrup, Godehard and Jaskolla, Ludwig (Eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 283302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goff, Philip (2017) Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goff, Philip (2019) Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Goff, Philip, Seager, William, and Allen-Hermanson, Sean (2020) Panpsychism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/panpsychism/>..>Google Scholar
Graziano, Michael (2013) Consciousness and the Social Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Niels Henrik (2010) God, Matter, and Information: Towards a Stoicizing Logos Christology. In Davies, Paul and Gregersen, Niels Henrik (Eds.), Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics, pp. 405443. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, David Ray (1998) Unsnarling the World-Knot: Consciousness, Freedom, and the Mind-Body Problem. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Groff, Ruth (2013) Ontology Revisited: Metaphysics in Social and Political Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (2013) (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gross, David J. (1996) The Role of Symmetry in Fundamental Physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93(25): 1425614259.Google Scholar
Grzankowski, Alex and Montague, Michelle (2018) Non-Propositional Intentionality: An Introduction. In Alex Grzankowski and Michelle Montague (Eds.), Non-Propositional Intentionality, pp. 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Handfield, Toby (2008) Unfinkable Dispositions. Synthese 160(2): 297308.Google Scholar
Harari, Yuval Noah (2015) Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom and Madden, Edward H. (1975) Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, John (2001) Causal Structuralism. Philosophical Perspectives 15(Metaphysics): 361378.Google Scholar
Heil, John (2003) From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heil, John (2010) Powerful Qualities. In Marmodoro, Anna (Ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, pp. 5872. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heil, John (2012) The Universe as We Find It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holton, Richard (1999) Dispositions All the Way Round. Analysis 59(1): 9–14.Google Scholar
Horgan, Terence E. and Potrč, Matjaž (2008) Austere Realism: Contextual Semantics Meets Minimal Ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (2002) A Treatise of Human Nature. Urbana, IL: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved July 7, 2022 from www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4705. (Originally published in 1739.)Google Scholar
Hume, David (2003) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Urbana, IL: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved July 7, 2022 from http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/9662. (Originally published in 1748.)Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (1997) How Properties Emerge. Philosophy of Science 64(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Hüttemann, Andreas (2009) Dispositions in Physics. In Damschen, Gregor, Schnepf, Robert, and Stüber, Karsten (Eds.), Debating Dispositions: Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind, pp. 223237. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Ingthorsson, R. D. (2013) Properties: Powers, Qualities, or Both? Dialectica 67(1): 5580.Google Scholar
Ingthorsson, R. D. (2015) The Regress of Pure Powers Revisited. European Journal of Philosophy 23(3): 529541.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Alan (2000) Oxford Dictionary of Physics, fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jonathan D. (2010) A Powers Theory of Modality: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Reject Possible Worlds. Philosophical Studies 151(2): 227248.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jonathan D. (2011) Powerful Qualities, Not Pure Powers. The Monist 94(1): 81–102.Google Scholar
James, William (1950) The Principles of Psychology, Vol. I. Mineola, New York: Dover. (Originally published in 1890.)Google Scholar
Jaworski, William (2016) Structure and the Metaphysics of Mind: How Hylomorphism Solves the Mind-Body Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C. S. and Nolan, Daniel (2012) Disposition Impossible. Noûs 46(4): 732753.Google Scholar
Johnson, Monte Ransome (2005) Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark (1992) How to Speak of the Colors. Philosophical Studies 68(3): 221263.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark (2009) Saving God: Religion after Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. Scott (2018) It’s Hard Work Being No One. Frontiers in Psychology 9(2632): 1–3.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn S. (2013) The Ineliminability of Dispositions in Hume’s Rejection of Causal Powers. In Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 6989. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koons, Robert C. and Pickavance, Timothy H. (2017) The Atlas of Reality: A Comprehensive Guide to Metaphysics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah (2016) Brentano’s Mature Theory of Intentionality. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4(2): 1–15.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah (2018) Belief-That and Belief-In. In Grzankowski, Alex and Montague, Michelle (Eds.), Non-Propositional Intentionality, pp. 192213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, Nick (2017) Teleological Dispositions. In Bennett, Karen and Zimmerman, Dean W. (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 10, pp. 3–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landry, Christian R. (2011) A Cellular Roadmap for the Plant Kingdom. Science 333(6042): 532533.Google Scholar
Lange, Marc (2009) Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae and Lewis, David (1998) Defining “Intrinsic.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58(2): 333345.Google Scholar
Laplane, Lucie, Mantovani, Paolo, Adolphs, Ralph, Chang, Hasok, Mantovani, Alberto, McFall-Ngai, Margaret, Rovelli, Carlo, Sober, Elliott, and Pradeu, Thomas (2019) Why Science Needs Philosophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(10): 39483952.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1991) Monadology. In Rescher, Nicholas (Ed.), G.W. Leibniz’s Monadology: An Edition for Students, pp. 1730. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Originally published in 1714.)Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1986a) Introduction. Philosophical Papers, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1986b) On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1994) Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind 103(412): 473490.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1997) Finkish Dispositions. The Philosophical Quarterly 47(187): 143158.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (2008) Ramseyan Humility. In Braddon-Mitchell, David and Nola, Robert (Eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, pp. 203222. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Livanios, Vassilis (2017a) The Categorical-Dispositional Distinction, Locations and Symmetry Operations. Acta Analytica 32(2): 133144.Google Scholar
Livanios, Vassilis (2017b) Science in Metaphysics: Exploring the Metaphysics of Properties and Laws. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Seth (2010) The Computational Universe. In Davies, Paul and Henrik Gregersen, Niels (Eds.), Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics, pp. 118133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (2004) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Urbana, IL: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved July 8, 2022 from www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10615 (Originally published in 1689.)Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (1998) The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maher, Chauncey (2017) Plant Minds: A Philosophical Defense. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mander, William (2020) Pantheism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/pantheism/>.Google Scholar
Manley, David and Wasserman, Ryan (2017) Dispositions without Teleology. In Bennett, Karen and Zimmerman, Dean W. (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 10, pp. 4759. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna (2009) Do Powers Need Powers to Make Them Powerful? History of Philosophy Quarterly 26(4): 337352.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna (2014) Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna (2020) Review of Neil E. Williams’ The Powers Metaphysic. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Notre Dame, IN: Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-powers-metaphysic/Google Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna (2021) Causal Powers in Aristotle and his Predecessors. In Jorati, Julia (Ed.), Powers: A History, pp. 1027. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. (1993) Power for Realists. In Bacon, John, Campbell, Keith, and Reinhardt, Lloyd (Eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong, pp. 175186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. (1996) Properties and Dispositions. In Crane, Tim (Ed.), Dispositions: A Debate, pp. 7187. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. (1997) On the Need for Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back. Synthese 112(2): 193231.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. (2008) The Mind in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. and Heil, John (1999) The Ontological Turn. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23(1): 3460.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. and Pfeifer, Karl (1986) Intentionality and the Non-Psychological. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46(4): 531554.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Nicholas (2020) Aim-Oriented Empiricism and the Metaphysics of Science. Philosophia 48(1): 347364.Google Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (2007) The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin (1989) Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem? Mind 98(391): 349366.Google Scholar
McKitrick, Jennifer (2003a) A Case for Extrinsic Dispositions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81(2): 155174.Google Scholar
McKitrick, Jennifer (2003b) The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66(2): 349369.Google Scholar
McKitrick, Jennifer (2005) Are Dispositions Causally Relevant? Synthese 144(3): 357371.Google Scholar
McKitrick, Jennifer (2009) Dispositional Pluralism. In Damschen, Gregor, Schnepf, Robert, and Stüber, Karsten (Eds.), Debating Dispositions: Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind, pp. 186203. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McKitrick, Jennifer (2017) Indirect Directedness. In Bennett, Karen and Zimmerman, Dean W. (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 10, pp. 3846. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKitrick, Jennifer (2018) Dispositional Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKitrick, Jennifer (2021) Powers in Contemporary Philosophy. In Jorati, Julia (Ed.), Powers: A History, pp. 271294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meincke, Anne Sophie (2020) Dispositionalism: Between Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. In Sophie Meincke, Anne (Ed.), Dispositionalism: Perspectives from Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 417 of Synthese Library, pp. 1–12. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Meixner, Uwe (2016) Idealism and Panpsychism. In Brüntrup, Godehard and Jaskolla, Ludwig (Eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 387406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mendola, Joseph (2008) Anti-Externalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra (2009) Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Molnar, George (2003) Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Mumford, Stephen (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Geoff (2018) Big Mind: How Collective Intelligence Can Change Our World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Thomas (2010) Formal Methods in the Philosophy of Natural Science. In Stadler, Friedrich (Ed.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 111124. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen (1998) Dispositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen (1999) Intentionality and the Physical: A New Theory of Disposition Ascription. The Philosophical Quarterly 49(195): 215225.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen (2004) Laws in Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen (2006) The Ungrounded Argument. Synthese 149(3): 471489.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen and Anjum, Rani Lill (2011) Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen and Anjum, Rani Lill (2015) Freedom and Control: On the Modality of Free Will. American Philosophical Quarterly 52(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen and Tugby, Matthew (2013) Introduction: What Is the Metaphysics of Science? In Mumford, Stephen and Tugby, Matthew (Eds.), Metaphysics and Science, pp. 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1974) What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review 83(4): 435450.Google Scholar
Nolan, Daniel (2014) David Lewis. New York: Routledge (First published in 2005 by Acumen.)Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy (2020) Emergent Properties. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University. URL =<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/properties-emergent/>..>Google Scholar
Oddie, Graham (1982) Armstrong on the Eleatic Principle and Abstract Entities. Philosophical Studies 41(2): 285295.Google Scholar
Oderberg, David S. (2017) Finality Revived: Powers and Intentionality. Synthese 194(7): 23872425.Google Scholar
Ott, Walter (2009) Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, Karl (2016) Pantheism as Panpsychism. In Buckareff, Andrei and Nagasawa, Yujin (Eds.), Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, pp. 4149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Place, Ullin T. (1996) Intentionality as the Mark of the Dispositional. Dialectica 50(2): 91–120.Google Scholar
Plato (1997) Sophist. In Cooper, John M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (Eds.), Nicholas P. White (Trans.), Plato: Complete Works, pp. 235293. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Powers, Thomas M. (2013) On the Moral Agency of Computers. Topoi 32(2): 227236.Google Scholar
Price, Huw (1996) Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham (2005) Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1957) Time and Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, Elizabeth (1985) Dispositions. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, Elizabeth W., Pargetter, Robert, and Jackson, Frank (1982) Three Theses about Dispositions. American Philosophical Quarterly 19(3): 251257.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (2006) What Do Powers Do when They Are Not Manifested? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72(1): 137156.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis and Ioannidis, Stavros (2019) Review of R. L. Anjum and S. Mumford’s What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Notre Dame, IN: Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/what-tends-to-be-the-philosophy-of-dispositional-modality/Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1973) Meaning and Reference. Journal of Philosophy 70(19): 699711.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1975) The Meaning of “Meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: Language, Mind, and Knowledge, pp. 131–193 Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1980) Reference and Modality. In From a Logical Point of View. Second Edition, pp. 139159. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (First edition published in 1953.)Google Scholar
Quiroga, R. Quian, Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C., Fried, I. (2005) Invariant Visual Representation by Single Neurons in the Human Brain. Nature 435(7045): 11021107.Google Scholar
Randall, Lisa (2005) Warped Passages: Unravelling the Mysteries of the Universe’s Hidden Dimensions. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1951) The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1991) G.W. Leibniz’s Monadology: An Edition for Students. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kevin (2020) Grounding Pluralism: Why and How. Erkenntnis 85(6): 13991415.Google Scholar
Roberts, John T. (2008) The Law-Governed Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo (1997) Halfway through the Woods: Contemporary Research on Space and Time. In Earman, John and Norton, John D. (Eds.), The Cosmos of Science, pp. 180223. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo (2017) Reality Is Not What It Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity. New York: Riverhead Books (Penguin).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1927) An Outline of Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert (1949) The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2001) The Individuation of Tropes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79(2): 247257.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2003) The Problem of Free Mass: Must Properties Cluster? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66(1): 125138.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2010a) The Internal Relatedness of All Things. Mind 119(474): 341376.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2010b) Monism: The Priority of the Whole. Philosophical Review 119(1): 3176.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2016) Grounding in the Image of Causation. Philosophical Studies 173(1): 49–100.Google Scholar
Schrenk, Markus (2017) Metaphysics of Science: A Systematic and Historical Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric (2001) In-Between Believing. The Philosophical Quarterly 51(202): 7682.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric (2002) A Phenomenal, Dispositional Account of Belief. Noûs 36(2): 249275.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1979) What Is an Intentional State? Mind 88(1): 7492.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1983) Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1984) Intentionality and Its Place in Nature. Dialectica 38(2/3): 8799.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1994) The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (2004) Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (2010) Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (2015) Seeing Things as They Are. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (2018) Are There Non-Propositional Intentional States? In Grzankowski, Alex and Montague, Michelle (Eds.), Non-Propositional Intentionality, pp. 259271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. and Weaver, Warren (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney (1980) Causality and Properties. In van Inwagen, Peter (Ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, pp. 109135. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney (1998) Causal and Metaphysical Necessity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79(1): 5977.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2011) Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skrbina, David (2005) Panpsychism in the West. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smolin, Lee (1991) Space and Time in the Quantum Universe. In Ashtekar, Abhay and Stachel, John (Eds.), Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, pp. 228291. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de (2006) Ethics. In Morgan, Michael L. (Ed.), Samuel Shirley (Trans.), The Essential Spinoza: Ethics and Related Writings, pp. 1–161. Indianapolis: Hackett (Originally published in 1677.)Google Scholar
Stapp, Henry (2010) Minds and values in the quantum universe. In Davies, Paul and Henrik Gregersen, Niels (Eds.), Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics, pp. 134154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Jesse R. (2010) Dispositions and Subjunctives. Philosophical Studies 148(3): 323341.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen (2008) The Identity of the Categorical and the Dispositional. Analysis 68(4): 271282.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen, Carruthers, Peter, Coleman, Sam, et al. (2006) Consciousness and Its Place in Nature: Does Physicalism Entail Panpsychism? Freeman, Anthony (Ed.). Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2013) Emergence, Causal Powers, and Aristotelianism in Metaphysics. In Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 4868. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swartzer, Steven (2013) Appetitive Besires and the Fuss about Fit. Philosophical Studies 165(3): 975988.Google Scholar
Taylor, Henry (2018) Powerful Qualities and Pure Powers. Philosophical Studies 175(6): 14231440.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael (2014) A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tononi, Giulio (2008) Consciousness as Integrated Information: A Provisional Manifesto. Biological Bulletin 215(3): 216242.Google Scholar
Tooley, Michael (1977) The Nature of Laws. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7(4): 667698.Google Scholar
Trigg, Roger (2015) Beyond Matter: Why Science Needs Metaphysics. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.Google Scholar
Tugby, Matthew (2013) Platonic Dispositionalism. Mind 122(486): 451480.Google Scholar
Tugby, Matthew (2016) Universals, Laws, and Governance. Philosophical Studies 173(5): 11471163.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas C. (1989) Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter (1990) Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vetter, Barbara (2015) Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wahlberg, Tobias Hansson (2020) Causal Powers and Social Ontology. Synthese 197(3): 13571377.Google Scholar
Wang, Jennifer (2015) The Modal Limits of Dispositionalism. Noûs 49(3): 454469.Google Scholar
Wheeler, John Archibald (1990) Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. In Zurek, Wojciech H. (Ed.), Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, pp. 3–28. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1953) On the Elements of Being: I. The Review of Metaphysics 7(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Williams, Neil E. (2005) Static and Dynamic Dispositions. Synthese 146(3): 303324.Google Scholar
Williams, Neil E. (2009) The Ungrounded Argument Is Unfounded: A Response to Mumford. Synthese 170(1): 7–19.Google Scholar
Williams, Neil E. (2010) Puzzling Powers: The Problem of Fit. In Marmodoro, Anna (Ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, pp. 84–105. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, Neil E. (2011) Dispositions and the Argument from Science. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89(1): 7190.Google Scholar
Williams, Neil E. (2017) Powerful Perdurance: Linking Parts with Powers. In Jacobs, Jonathan D. (Ed.), Causal Powers, pp. 139164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Neil E. (2019) The Powers Metaphysic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jessica (2010) What Is Hume’s Dictum, and Why Believe It? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80(3): 595637.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jessica M. (2021) Metaphysical Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen (1999) Intrinsicness. Philosophical Topics 26(1/2): 479505.Google Scholar
Yates, David (2015) Dispositionalism and the Modal Operators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91(2): 411424.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • William A. Bauer, North Carolina State University
  • Book: Causal Powers and the Intentionality Continuum
  • Online publication: 13 October 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009214858.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • William A. Bauer, North Carolina State University
  • Book: Causal Powers and the Intentionality Continuum
  • Online publication: 13 October 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009214858.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • William A. Bauer, North Carolina State University
  • Book: Causal Powers and the Intentionality Continuum
  • Online publication: 13 October 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009214858.013
Available formats
×