Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-dfw9g Total loading time: 0.805 Render date: 2022-08-08T08:47:33.470Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

Simon Truwant
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos
The Philosophical Arguments
, pp. 249 - 261
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

2
3
Abela, Paul, Kant’s Empirical Realism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, An Interpretation and Defense, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Aubenque, Pierre, ‘Philosophie und Politik: Die Davoser Disputation zwischen Ernst Cassirer und Martin Heidegger in der Retrospektive’, in: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2, 1992, 290312.Google Scholar
Barash, Jeffrey Andrew, ‘Ernst Cassirer, Martin Heidegger, and the Legacy of Davos’, in: History and Theory, 51, 2012, 436450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bast, Rainer A., Problem, Geschichte, Form. Das Verhältnis von Philosophie und Geschichte bei Ernst Cassirer im historischen Kontext. Berlin: Dunker & Humblot, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Thora Ilin, Cassirer’s Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms. A Philosophical Commentary, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick, ‘Weimar Philosophy and the Fate of Neo-Kantianism’, in: Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy, ed. by Gordon, Peter Eli and McCormick, John P., Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013, 115132.Google Scholar
Bermes, Christian, Philosophie der Bedeutung – Bedeutung als Bestimmung und Bestimmbarkeit. Eine Studie zu Frege, Husserl, Cassirer und Hönigswald, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1997.Google Scholar
Bernet, Rudolf, ‘Perception et herméneutique (Husserl, Cassirer et Heidegger)’, in: La vie du sujet, Paris: PUF, 1994, 139161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernet, Rudolf, ‘The Hermeneutics of Perception in Cassirer, Heidegger, and Husserl’, in: Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, ed. by Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Luft, Sebastian, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010, 4158.Google Scholar
Blattner, William, Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’, London/New York: Bloomsbury, 2006.Google Scholar
Blattner, William, ‘Laying the Ground for Metaphysics: Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant’, in: The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Guignon, Charles B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 149176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans, Die Legitimität der Neuzeit, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans, Theorie der Lebenswelt, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2010.Google Scholar
Bollnow, Otto Friedrich, ‘Gespräche in Davos’, in: Erinnerung an Martin Heidegger, hrsg. Neske, von Günther, Pfullingen, 1977, 2529.Google Scholar
Brecht, Franz Josef, ‘Die Situation der gegenwärtigen Philosophie’, in: Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung, 6/1, 1930, 4258.Google Scholar
Brown, Gary Ronald, The 1929 Davos Disputation Revisited, Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
John D., Caputo, Hermeneutics. Facts and Interpretaton in the Age of Information. Penguin Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor, Heidegger’s Analytic. Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in ‘Being and Time’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor, ‘Things Fall Apart: Heidegger on the Constancy and Finality of Death’, in: Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time, ed. by McManus, Denis, New York: Routledge, 2015, 135145.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf, Archives for Scientific Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh Libraries, ASP RC 025-73-03, 30 March 1929.Google Scholar
Carr, David, ‘Heidegger on Kant on Transcendence’, in: Transcendental Heidegger, ed. by Crowell, Steven and Malpas, Jeff, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007, 2842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Toni, Mein Leben mit Ernst Cassirer. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, Berlin: Ferd. Dümmler Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1871.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, Das Prinzip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte: Ein Kaptiel zur Grundlegung der Erkenntniskritik, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1883.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann, System der Philosophie. Erster Teil: Logik der reinen Erkenntnis, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1902.Google Scholar
Crowe, Paul, ‘Between Termini: Heidegger, Cassirer, and the Two Terms of Transcendental Method’, in: Philosophy Today, 47, 2003, 100106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven, Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel, ‘Heidegger’s Kantian Turn: Notes to His Commentary on the ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’, The Review of Metaphysics, 45/2, 1991, 329361.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel, ‘The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination’, in: The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 380400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, Karin, ‘Heidegger’s Ontological Reading of Kant’, in: The Bloomsbury Companion to Kant, ed. by Banham, Gary, Schulting, Dennis, and Hems, Nigel, London: Bloomsbury, 2012, 324329.Google Scholar
De Boer, Karin, ‘Kant’s Multi-Layered Conception of Things in Themselves, Transcendental Objects, and Monads’, in: Kant-Studien, 105/2, 2014, 221260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Warren, Nicolas, ‘Reise um die Welt. Cassirer’s Cosmological Phenomenology’, in: New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism, ed. by de Warren, Nicolas and Staiti, Andrea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 82107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, Éric, Paul Natorp, de la Psychologie générale à la Systématique philosophique, Paris: Vrin, 2010.Google Scholar
Elkholy, Sharin N., Heidegger and a Metaphysics of Feeling. Angst and the Finitude of Being, in: Continuum Studies in Continental Philosophy, London/New York: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Elliott, Brian, Phenomenology and Imagination in Heidegger and Husserl, London/New York: Routledge, 2015, 8498.Google Scholar
Engelland, Chad, ‘The Phenomenological Kant: Heidegger’s Interest in Transcendental Philosophy’, in: Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 41, 2010, 150169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelland, Chad, Heidegger’s Shadow. Kant, Husserl, and the Transcendental Turn. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englert, Ludwig, ‘Als Student bei den zweiten Davoser Hochschulkursen’, in: Nachlese zu Heidegger: Dokumente zu seinem Leben und Denken, hrsg. Schneeberger, von Guido, Bern: Private Edition, 1962, 16.Google Scholar
Farias, Victor, Heidegger and Nazism, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Faye, Emmanuel, Heidegger: L’introduction du nazisme dans la philosophie. Autour des séminaires inédits de 1933–1935, Paris: Albin Michel, 2005.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Massimo, ‘Natorp, Paul. ‘The Missing Link’ in Debatte’, der Davoser, in: Cassirer-Heidegger: 70 Jahre Davoser Disputation, hrsg. Kaegi, von Dominic und Rudolph, Enno, in: Cassirer-Forschungen, Band 9, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2002, 215233.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Massimo, Ernst Cassirer. Stationen einer philosophischen Biographie. Von der Marburger Schule zur Kulturtheorie, tr. Lauschke, von Marion, in: Cassirer-Forschungen, Band 11, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Massimo, ‘Is Cassirer a Neo-Kantian Methodologically Speaking?’, in: Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, ed. by Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Luft, Sebastian, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010, 293314.Google Scholar
Fetz, Reto Luzius, ‘Forma formata – forma formans. Zur historischen und systematischen Bedeutung von Cassirers Metaphysik des Symbolischen’, in: Lebendige Form. Zur Metaphysik des Symbolischen in Ernst Cassirers ‘Nachgelassenen Manuskripten und Texten’, hrsg. Luzius Fetz, von Reto und Ullrich, Sebastian, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2008, 1533.Google Scholar
Figal, Gunther, and Rudolph, Enno, ‘Editorial’, in: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie. Heft 2, 1992, 163166.Google Scholar
Flynn, Thomas R., ‘Angst and Care in the Early Heidegger: The Ontic/Ontological Aporia’, in: International Studies in Philosophy, 12/1, 1980, 6176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon, ‘The Hero of Enlightenment’, in: The Symbolic Construction of Reality. The Legacy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Barash, Jeffrey Andrew, Chicago: The University Press of Chicago, 2008, 189213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael, A Parting of the Ways. Cassirer, Heidegger, Carnap, Chicago and La Salle Open Court, 2000.Google Scholar
Gelven, Michael, A Commentary on Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’, Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Goldman, Avery, Kant and the Subject of the Critique. On the Regulative Role of the Psychological Idea, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter E., ‘Myth and Modernity: Cassirer’s Critique of Heidegger’, in: New German Critique, 94: Secularization and Disenchantment, 2005, 127168.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter E., Continental Divide. Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter E., ‘Heidegger, Neo-Kantianism, and Cassirer’, in: The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Raffoulr, Francois and Nelson, Eric S., London: Bloomsbury, 2013, 143149.Google Scholar
Gorner, Paul, ‘Phenomenological Interpretations of Kant in Husserl and Heidegger’, in: A Companion to Kant, ed. by Bird, Graham, Oxford: Blackwell, 2010, 502512.Google Scholar
Gründer, Karlfried, ‘Cassirer und Heidegger in Davos 1929’, in: Über Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, hrsg. Braun, von Hans-Jürg, Holzhey, Helmut, und Orth, Ernst Wolfgang, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988, 290302.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles, ‘Heidegger’s Concept of Freedom, 1927–1930’, in: Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays, ed. by Dahlstrom, Daniel O., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 79105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Der Deutsche Idealismus der Jüdischen Philosophie’, in: Philosophisch-politische Profile, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981, 3964.Google Scholar
Han-Pile, Béatrice, ‘Early Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant’, in: A Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark A., Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, 80101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Robert S., ‘Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms’, in: The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Schilpp, Paul Arthur, La Salle: Open Court, 1949, 289333.Google Scholar
Hartung, Gerald, Das Maβ des Menschen. Aporien der Philosophischen Anthropologie und ihre Auflösung in der Kulturphilosophie Ernst Cassirers, Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft, 2003.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John, ‘Truth and Finitude: Heidegger’s Transcendental Existentialism’, in: Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity. Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume I, ed. by Wrathall, Mark and Malpas, Jeff, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hendel, Charles W., ‘Foreword’ in: Ernst Cassirer, The Myth of the State, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979, vxii.Google Scholar
Held, Klaus, ‘Fundamental Moods and Heidegger’s Critique of Contemporary Culture’, in: Reading Heidegger: Commemorations, ed. by Sallis, John, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993, 286303.Google Scholar
Herrigel, Hermann, ‘Denken dieser Zeit: Fakultäten und Nationen treffen sich in Davos’, Frankfurter Zeitung, April 22, 1929, Hochschulblatt, 4.Google Scholar
Holzhey, Helmuth and Mudroch, Vilem, Historical Dictionary of Kant and Kantianism, Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Howald, Ernst, ‘Betrachtungen zu den Davoser Hochschulkursen’, in: Neue Zürcher Zeitung, April 10, 1929, Morgenausgabe, 1.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, tr. by Cairns, Dorion, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, Axel, Geschichtliche Vernunft: die Weiterführung der Kantischen Vernunftkritik in der Spätphilosophie Schellings, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996.Google Scholar
Hutter, Axel, Das Interesse der Vernunft. Kants Ursprüngliche Einischt und ihre Entfaltung in den Transzendentalphilosophischen Hauptwerken, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Ijsseling, Samuel, ‘Heidegger and the Destruction of Ontology’, in: A Companion to Martin Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’, ed. by Kockelmans, Joseph J., Washington DC: The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America, 1986, 127144.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl, ‘Letter [to Heidegger] 24, July 21, 1925’, in: Briefwechsel, 1920–1963, hrsg. Biemel, von Walter und Saner, Hans, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 1990, 5152.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Iredell, ‘The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer’ (book review), in: The Journal of Philosophy, 47/2, 1950, 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaegi, Dominic, ‘Davos und davor – Zur Auseinandersetzung zwischen Heidegger und Cassirer’, in: Cassirer-Heidegger: 70 Jahre Davoser Disputation, hrsg. Kaegi, von Dominic und Rudolph, Enno, in: Cassirer-Forschungen, Band 9, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2002, 67105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaegi, Dominic, und Rudolph, Enno, ‘Vorwort’, in: Cassirer-Heidegger: 70 Jahre Davoser Disputation, hrsg. Kaegi, von Dominic und Rudolph, Enno, in: Cassirer-Forschungen, Band 9, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2002, vviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘The Jäsche logic’, in: Lectures on Logic, ed. by Michael Young, J., in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, 521640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, in: Practical Philosophy, ed. by Gregor, Mary J., in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 133271.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?’, in: Religion and Rational Theology, ed. by Wood, Allen W. and Di Giovanni, George, in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, tr. by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W., in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science, tr. by Ellington, James W., Indianapolis: Hackett, 2001.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, tr. by Friedman, Michael, in: Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Reflexionen zur Metaphysik, in: Notes and Fragments, ed. by Guyer, Paul, in: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, ed. by Louden, Robert, in: Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgement, tr. by Meredith, James Creed, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Felix, ‘Cassirer’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge’ in: The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Arthur, Paul Schilpp, La Salle: Open Court, 1949, 183213.Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan, ‘Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant’, in: Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays, ed. by Dahlstrom, Daniel O., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 174196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore, The Genesis of Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia, Kant’s Transcendental Psychology, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia, Kant’s Thinker, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Jo-Jo, ‘Heidegger’s Underdeveloped Conception of the Undistinguishedness (Indifferenz) of Everyday Human Existence’, in: From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity. Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, ed. by Schmid, Hans Bernhard and Thonhauser, Gerhard, Berlin: Springer, 2017, 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Guido, Cassirer und die Formen des Geistes, Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2010.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael, Cassirer: Symbolic Forms and History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael, ‘Problematik, Eigenart und Aktualität der Cassirerschen Philosophie der symbolischen Formen’, in: Über Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, hrsg. Braun, von Hans-Jürg, Holzhey, Helmut, und Orth, Ernst Wolfgang, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988, 1544.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael, ‘Aufklärung und Metaphysik. Zur Philosophie Cassirers und der Davoser Debatte mit Heidegger’, in: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie. Heft 2, 1992, 273289.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael, ‘Cassirer, Neo-Kantianism and Metaphysics’, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 97/4, 1992, 437453.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael, ‘Warum fand keine Davoser Debatte zwischen Cassirer und Heidegger statt?’, in: Cassirer-Heidegger: 70 Jahre Davoser Disputation, hrsg. Kaegi, von Dominic und Rudolph, Enno, in: Cassirer-Forschungen, Band 9, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2002, 234246.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael, ‘Why Did Cassirer and Heidegger Not Debate at Davos?’, in: Symbolic Forms and Cultural Studies. Ernst Cassirer’s Theory of Culture, ed. by Hamlin, Cyrus and Krois, John Michael, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004, 244262.Google Scholar
Lafont, Christina, ‘Heidegger and the Synthetic a Priori’, in: Transcendental Heidegger, ed. by Crowell, Steven and Malpas, Jeff, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007, 104118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Susanne K., Philosophical Sketches, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, ‘Entretien Avec Roger-Pol’, in: Les Imprévus de l’histoire, ed. Hayat, Pierre, Montpellier: Fata Morgana, 1994, 203210.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, et François, Poiré, Essai et Entretiens, Paris: Actes Sud, 1996.Google Scholar
Levine, Emily J., Dreamland of Humanists: Warburg, Cassirer, Panofsky, and the Hamburg School, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofts, S.G., Ernst Cassirer: A “Repetition” of Modernity, Albany: SUNY Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian, ‘Kaegi, Dominic/Rudolph, Enno, Cassirer-Heidegger. 70 Jahre Davoser Disputation (book review), in: Journal Phänomenologie, 19, 2003, 9194.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian, ‘Kaegi, Dominic/Rudolph, Enno, ‘Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Between Reason and Relativism; a Critical Appraisal’, in: Idealistic Studies, 34/1, 2004, 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, Sebastian, ‘Kaegi, Dominic/Rudolph, Enno, ‘Gordon, Peter E., Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos’ (book review), in: Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49/4, 2011, 508509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, Sebastian, The Space of Culture. Towards a Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Culture (Cohen, Natorp, Cassirer), Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, Sebastian, and Capeillères, Fabien, ‘Neo-Kantianism in Germany and France’, in: The History of Continental Philosophy, volume 3: The New Century: Bergsonism, Phenomenology, and Responses to Modern Science, ed. by Pearson, Keith-Ansell and Schrift, Aland D., London/New York: Routledge, 2010, 4785.Google Scholar
Macann, Christopher, ‘Heidegger’s Kant Interpretation’, in: Critical Heidegger, ed. by Macann, Christopher, London/New York: Routledge, 1996, 97120.Google Scholar
Maier-Katkin, Daniel, Stranger from Abroad: Hannah Arendt, Martin Heidegger, Friendship and, Forgiveness, New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2010.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A., Imagination and Interpretation in Kant. The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A., and Luft, Sebastian, ‘Introduction’, in: Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010, 121.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis, ‘Anxiety, Choice and Responsibility in Heidegger’s Account of Authenticity’, in: Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self. Themes from Division Two of ‘Being and Time’, 163185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, tr. by Colin, Smith, London/New York: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreiras, Alberto, ‘Heidegger, Kant, and the Problem of Transcendence’, in: The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 34/1, 1986, 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen, Heidegger and ‘Being and Time’, London/New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul, Einleitung in die Psychologie nach kritischer Methode, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1888.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul, ‘Zur Frage der logischen Methode. Mit Beziehung auf Edmund Husserl’s ‘Prolegomena’ zur reinen Logik’, in: Kant-Studien, 6, 1901, 270283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natorp, Paul, ‘Kant und die Marburger Schule’, in: Kant-Studien 17, 1912, 193221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natorp, Paul, ‘Husserl’s Ideen zu einer Reinen Phänomenologie’, in: Logos, VII, 1917/1918, 224246.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul, Vorlesungen über praktische Philosophie, Erlangen: Verlag der philosophischen Akademie, 1925.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul, Allgemeine Philosophie nach Kritischer Methode. Buch, Erstes Objekt und Methode der Psychologie (1912), ed. by Luft, Sebastian, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2013.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan, The Unity of Reason. Rereading Kant, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica, Kant and the Unity of Reason, in: History of Philosophy Series, West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Orth, Ernst Wolfgang, ‘Zugänge zu Ernst Cassirer. Eine Einleitung’, in: Über Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, hrsg. Braun, von Hans-Jürg, Holzhey, Helmut, und Orth, Ernst Wolfgang, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988, 711.Google Scholar
Orth, Ernst Wolfgang, Von der Erkenntnistheorie zur Kulturphilosophie. Studien zu Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2004.Google Scholar
Paetzold, Heinz, Die Realität der Symbolischen Formen. Die Kulturphilosophie Ernst Cassirers im Kontext, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1994.Google Scholar
Paetzold, Heinz, ‘Die symbolische Ordnung der Kultur. Ernst Cassirers Beitrag zu einer Theorie der Kulturentwicklung’, in: Ernst Cassirers Werk und Wirkung, hrsg. Frede, von Dorothea und Schmücker, Reinold, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1997, 163184.Google Scholar
Peone, Dustin, ‘Ernst Cassirer’s Essential Critique of Heidegger and Verfallenheit’, in: Idealistic Studies, 42/2–3, 2013, 119130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B., ‘Necessary Conditions for the Possibility of What Isn’t. Heidegger on Failed Meaning’, in: Transcendental Heidegger, ed. by Crowell, Steven and Malpas, Jeff, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007, 199214.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina, ‘Die Erforschung des Geistes – Cassirers Auseinandersetzung mit der zeitgenössischen Psychologie’, in: Kultur und Symbol. Ein Handbuch zur Philosophie Ernst Cassierers, hrsg. Jörg Sandkühler, von Hans und Pätzold, Detlev, Stuttgart: Verlag J.B. Metzler, 2003, 85110.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina, Wahrnehmung, Repräsentation und Wissen. Edmund Husserls und Ernst Cassirers Analysen zur Struktur des Bewusstseins, Berlin: Parerga Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Poiré, François, Emmanuel Levinas: Qui êtes-vous? Lyon: La Manufacture, 1987.Google Scholar
Pos, Hendrik J., ‘Recollections of Ernst Cassirer’, in: The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Schilpp, Paul Arthur, La Salle: Open Court, 1949, 6372.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit, ‘Kultur ohne Moral? Warum Cassirer trotz der Einsicht in den Primat der praktischen Vernunft keine Ethik schreiben konnte’, in: Ernst Cassirers Werk und Wirkung, hrsg. Frede, von Dorothea und Schmücker, Reinold, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1997, 5878.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit, Kultur als Praxis. Eine Einführung in Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Sonderband 6, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit, Cassirer, in: Grundwissen Philosophie, Stuttgart: Reclam, 2013.Google Scholar
Rotolo, Catia, Der Symbolbegriff im Denken Ernst Cassirer, tr. by Schröder, Leonie, in: Philosophie und Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Band 76, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Gmbh, 2013.Google Scholar
Roubach, Michael, ‘The Limits of Order. Cassirer and Heidegger on Finitude and Infinity’, in: The Symbolic Construction of Reality: The Legacy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Barash, Jeffrey Andrew, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008, 104113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Enno, Ernst Cassirer im Kontext. Kulturphilosphie zwischen Metaphysik und Historismus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar
Schalow, Frank, The Renewal of the Heidegger Kant Dialogue: Action, Thought and, Responsibility, Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schalow, Frank, ‘Thinking at Cross Purposes with Kant: Reason, Finitude and Truth in the Cassirer-Heidegger Debate’, in: Kant-Studien, 87/2, 1996, 198217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwemmer, Oswald, Ernst Cassirer: Ein Philosoph der Europäischen Moderne, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, Sebastian, Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Phenomenology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serck-Hanssen, Camilla, ‘Towards Fundamental Ontology: Heidegger’s Phenomenological Reading of Kant’, in: Continental Philosophy Review, 48, 2015, 217235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas, ‘Facticity and Ereignis’, in: Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays, ed. by Dahlstrom, Daniel O., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 4268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skidelsky, Edward, Ernst Cassirer: The Last Philosopher of Culture, Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo, ‘Kurt Riezler (1882–1955)’, in: What Is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1959, 233260.Google Scholar
Sturma, Dieter, Kant über Selbstbewuβtsein, New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
Swabey, William Curtis, ‘Cassirer and Metaphysics’, in: The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Schilpp, Paul Arthur, La Salle: Open Court, 1949, 121148.Google Scholar
Tate, Adam R., ‘On Heidegger’s Root and Branch Reformulation of Transcendental Psychology’, in The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 46/1, 2015, 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trawny, Peter, Heidegger und der Mythos der jüdischen Welverschwörung, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 2014.Google Scholar
Truwant, Simon, ‘Kant‘s Transcendental Reflection: An Indispensable Element of Philosophy of Culture’, in: Critical Studies in German Idealism, vol. 15: The Marriage between Aesthetics and Ethics:, ed. by Symons, Stéphane, Brill Academic Publishing, 2015, 169184.Google Scholar
Truwant, Simon, ‘Political Myth and the Problem of Orientation: Reading Cassirer in Times of Cultural Crisis’, in: Interpreting Cassirer: Critical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 130148.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Sebastian, ‘Der Status der ‘Philosophischen Erkenntnis’ in Ernst Cassirers ‘Metaphysik des Symbolischen’, in: Recki, Birgit (hrsg.), Philosophie der Kultur – Kultur des Philosophierens: Ernst Cassirer im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2012, 297319.Google Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip, ‘Kant, Hegel, and Cassirer: The Origins of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms’, in: Journal of the History of Ideas, 30/1, 1969, 3346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip, ‘Cassirer’s Metaphysics’, in: The Symbolic Construction of Reality: The Legacy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Barash, Jeffrey Andrew, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008, 93103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip, The Origins of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Kant, Hegel, and Cassirer, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eekert, Geert, ‘‘Synthesis Speciosa’ en de Taak van de Filosofie. Cassirer en Heidegger voor het Tribunaal van de Kritik der Reinen Vernunft’, in: Gehelen en Fragmenten: De Vele Gezichten van de Filosofie, red. door Raymaekers, Bart, Leuven: Universitaire Pers, 1993, 230234.Google Scholar
Van Eekert, Geert, ‘Freiheit und Endlichkeit: Cassirer, Heidegger und Kant’, in: Life, Subjectivity & Art. Essays in Honor of Rudolf Bernet, ed. by Melle, Ulrich and Breeur, Roland, in: Phaenomenologica 201, Berlin: Springer, 2011, 195216.Google Scholar
Von Wolzogen, Christoph, Die autonome Relation. Zum Problem der Beziehung im Spätwerk Paul Natorps. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Theorien der Relation, Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, KatherineBreaking Down Experience – Heidegger’s Methodological Use of Breakdown in Being and Time’, in: European Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Weatherston, Martin, Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withy, Katherine, ‘The Methodological Role of Anxiety in Being and Time’, in: Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 43/2, 2012, 195211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withy, Katherine, Heidegger on Being Uncanny, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaborowksi, Holger, ‘Heidegger’s Hermeneutics: Towards a New Practice of Understanding’, in: Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays, ed. by Dahlstrom, Daniel O., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael E., Eclipse of the Self. The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of Authenticity, Athens: Ohio University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Simon Truwant, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009019569.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Simon Truwant, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009019569.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Simon Truwant, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos
  • Online publication: 05 May 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009019569.016
Available formats
×