Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rcd7l Total loading time: 0.627 Render date: 2021-10-23T08:25:02.857Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

13 - Changing Contours of The Social Science Disciplines


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Theodore M. Porter
University of California, Los Angeles
Dorothy Ross
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access


The disciplines recognized in the twentieth century as the social sciences emerged from older branches of knowledge by a process of separation and negotiation between related and overlapping areas of interest. As Theodore Porter points out, some of these lines of inquiry had been relatively continuous genres of writing for centuries, but they were often strands in broader traditions of knowledge and practice — chiefly philosophy, history, and affairs of state — and they were part of the intellectual equipment of liberally educated people, rather than occupations for specialists. Beginning in some cases earlier, but more conspicuously in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, they formed into fields to which specialists devoted their principal efforts and sites for research, reflection, and training. This modern idea of disciplines itself emerged over the course of the nineteenth century, a product of increasing specialization in science, scholarship, and technical expertise; the research ideal pioneered in German universities; and the reconstruction of higher educational systems and administrative institutions in Europe and the United States. University training and credentialing was especially important in solidifying the existence of continuing communities of specialized scholars.

We should not overemphasize the rapidity or pervasiveness of this transformation. In Europe, disciplinary organization was never as firmly established nor as important to the production of social knowledge as it was in the United States; and even there, the course of development was uneven. Still, specialized disciplines became a basic feature of the human sciences in the twentieth century and, particularly after the Second World War, an international pattern of intellectual organization.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bannister, Robert C., Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert in Social Darwinism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Bernard, Berelson, “Behavioral Sciences,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David L. (New York: Macmillan, 1968), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Bernard, Yack, The Fetishism of Modernities: Epochal Self-Consciousness in Contemporary Social and Political Thought (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), chap. 5.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J., Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Bernstien, Richard J., The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., in The Non-Darwinian Revolution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Brick, Howard, “Talcott Parson’s ‘Shift away from Economics’, 1937–1946,” Journal of American History, 87 (September 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, G. A. Christopher, Positivism in Social Theory and Research (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985), chap. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Kerry W., Mechanical Man: John Broadus Watson and the Beginnings of Behaviorism (New York: Guilford Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Bulmer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish, eds., The Social Survey in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Burger, Thomas, Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation, exp. ed. (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Burton, R. Clark and Neave, Guy R., eds., Academic Disciplines and Indexes, vol. 4 of The Encyclopedia of Higher Education (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. ed., The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Craver, Earlene, “Patronage and the Directions of Research in Economics: The Rockefeller Foundation in Europe, 1924–1938,” Minerva, 24 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, Kurt, Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), chap. I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, Kurt, Naming the Mind (London: Sage, 1997), chap. 6.Google Scholar
Dorothy, Ross, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, EllenEndless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Pantheon, 1978).Google Scholar
Gerstein, Dean R., Duncan Luce, R., Smelser, Neil J., and Sperlich, Sonja, eds., The Behavioral and Social Sciences (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Geuter, Ulfried, The Professionalization of Psychology in Nazi Germany (1984) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Jan, “Foucault among the Sociologists: The ‘Disciplines’ and the History of the Professions,” History and Theory, 23 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Earlene, “The Emigration of the Austrian Economists,” History of Political Economy, 18 (1986).Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G., The Descent of Political Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Hammack, David C. and Wheeler, Stanton, eds., Social Science in the Making: Essays on the Russell Sage Foundation, 1907–1972 (New York: Russell Sage, 1994).Google Scholar
Haraway, DonnaPrimate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science (New York: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L., The Emergence of Professional Social Science (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Higham, John, “The Schism in American Scholarship,” in his Writing American History (Bloomington: Indian University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Hollinger, David, “James, Clifford, and the Scientific Conscience,” in The Cambridge Companion to William James, ed. Putnam, Ruth Anna (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hollinger, David, “The Knower and the Artificer, with Postscript 1993,” in Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870–1930, ed. Ross, Dorothy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hollinger, David, “The Problem of Pragmatism in American History,” in his In the American Province: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ideas (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Hollinger, Robert and Depew, David, eds. Pragmatism: From Progressivism to Postmodernism (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1995).Google Scholar
Jay, Martin, The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1973).Google Scholar
Jordan, John M., Machine-Age Ideology: Social Engineering and American Liberalism, 1911–1939 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Karady, Victor, “The Prehistory of Present-Day French Sociology 1917–1957,” in French Sociology: Rupture and Renewal Since 1968, ed. Lemert, Charles C. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Karl, Barry D. and Katz, Stanley N., “The American Private Philanthropic Foundation and the Public Sphere, 1890–1930,” Minerva, 19 (1981).Google ScholarPubMed
Kastendiek, Hans, “Political Development and Political Science in West Germany,” in The Development of Political Science, ed. Easton, David, Gunnell, John G., and Graziano, Luigi (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Kleinman, Daniel Lee and Solovey, Mark, “Hot Science/Cold War: The National Science Foundation after World War II,” Radical History Review, 63 (1995).Google Scholar
Kline, Ronald, “Construing ‘Technology’ as ‘Applied Science’: Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880–1945,” Isis, 86 (1995).Google Scholar
Krohn, Claus-Dieter, “Dismissal and Emigration of German-Speaking Economists after 1933,” in Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Emigré German-Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933, ed. Ash, Mitchell G. and Sollner, Alfons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Kuklick, Henrika, The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology, 1885–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), chap. I.Google Scholar
Lagemann, Ellen Condliffe, The Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, Philanthropy, and Public Policy (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, Science in Action (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf, Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, “French Sociology,” in Twentieth Century Sociology, ed. Gurvitch, Georges and Moore, Wilbert E. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1945).Google Scholar
Levine, Donald N., Visions of the Sociological Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, David F., The Practical Imagination: The German Sciences of State in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, John, Marshall, Orthodoxy and the Professionalisation of Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Manicas, Peter T., A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987), chap. 10.Google Scholar
Mary, Furner, Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1975).Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles E., State, Society, and University in Germany, 1700–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Meinolf, Dierkes and Biervert, Bernd, eds., European Social Science in Transition (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag; Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, “The When, the How and Why of Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (Winter 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawski, Jill G., “Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale’s Institute of Human Relations,” Isis, 77 (June 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm, “American Economics: The Character of the Transformation,” in From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, ed. Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Munch, Richard, “The Contribution of German Social Theory to European Sociology,” in Sociology in Europe, ed. Nedelmann, Birgitta and Sztompka, Piotr (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1993).Google Scholar
Nedelmann, Birgitta and Sztompka, Piotr eds. in Sociology in Europe, (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleson, Alexandra and Voss, John, eds., The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860–1920 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Page, Charles H., “The Decline of Sociology’s Constituency,” History of Sociology, 6 (Fall 1985).Google Scholar
Pandora, Katherine, Rebels within the Ranks: Psychologists’ Critique of Scientific Authority and Democratic Realities in New Deal America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, The Early Essays, ed. Camic, Charles (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Pauly, Philip J., Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed., Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, Jennifer, A History of Sociological Research Methods in America, 1920–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M., in Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Ringer, Fritz K., The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890–1933 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Ringer, Fritz, Fields of Knowledge: French Academic Culture in Comparative Perspective, 1890–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Roberts, Jon H., “The Human Mind and Personality,” in Encyclopedia of the United States in the Twentieth Century, ed. , Stanley I. Kutler (New York: Scribner’s 1996).Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England, 1869–1939 (London: Routledge, 1985).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, RosalindBeyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Ross, , Origins of American Social Science, to 1930.Google Scholar
Samelson, Franz, “Organizing for the Kingdom of Behavior: Academic Battles and Organizational Policies in the Twenties,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 21 (January 1985).3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverberg, Helene, ed., Gender and American Social Science: The Formative Years (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Sklar, Judith, “Alexander Hamilton and the Language of Political Science,” in Redeeming American Political Thought, ed. Hoffmann, Stanley and Thompson, Dennis F. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Smith, Laurence D., Behaviorism and Logical Positivism (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Smith, Roger, The Norton History of the Human Sciences (New York: Norton, 1997).Google Scholar
Soffer, Reba N., Ethics and Society in England: The Revolution in the Social Sciences, 1870–1914 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr., After Tylor: British Social Anthropology, 1888–1951 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr., Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology (1968) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence, ed., The University in Society, 2 vols. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen, “The Pittsburgh Survey and the Survey Movement: An Episode in the History of Expertise,” in Pittsburgh Surveyed: Social Science and Social Reform in the Early Twentieth Century, ed. Greenwald, Maurine W. and Anderson, Margo (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. and Käsler, Dirk, eds., Sociology Responds to Fascism (London: Routledge, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Strien, Pieter J., “The American ‘Colonization’ of Northwest European Social Psychology after World War II,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 33 (Fall 1997).3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Peter and Wittrock, Bjorn, “States, Institutions, and Discourses: A Comparative Perspective on the Structuration of the Social Sciences,” in Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, ed. Wagner, Peter, Wittrock, Björn, and Whitley, Richard (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Peter, Weiss, Carol H., Wittrock, Björn, and Wollmann, Hellmut, eds., Social Sciences and Modern States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, , “SociologyAmerican Academic Culture in Transformation: Fifty Years, Four Disciplines [philosophy, literary studies, political science, economics], Daedalus, 126 (Winter 1997).Google Scholar
Watson, John B., Behaviorism (1924) (New York: Norton, 1970).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problems of Historical Economics (New York: Free Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and ed. Shils, Edward and Finch, Henry, Foreword by Shils, Edward (New York: Free Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Weisz, George, The Emergence of Modern Universities in France, 1863–1914 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Wightman Fox, Richard, “Epitaph for Middletown: Robert S. Lynd and the Analysis of Consumer Culture,” in The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880–1980 (New York: Pantheon, 1983).Google Scholar
Wobbe, TheresaOn the Horizons of a New Discipline: Early Women Sociologists in Germany,” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 25 (Michaelmas 1995).Google Scholar
Yeo, Eileen JanesThe Contest for Social Science: Relations and Representations of Gender and Class (London: Rivers Oram Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats