Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rlmms Total loading time: 0.448 Render date: 2021-10-16T03:51:19.282Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

10 - Cosmology: The Heavenly Bodies

from III - Natural Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2009

Steven Nadler
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
T. M. Rudavsky
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In medieval thought, the heavenly bodies held the highest status among all the material bodies. Whatever the specific philosophical or religious orientation of a person, he (or, much more rarely, she) believed that the stars and the planets (as well as the spheres to which they are affixed) were made of a noble “fifth matter,” distinct from the four sublunar elements with which it did not interact. The heavenly bodies were therefore excluded from the cycles of generation and corruption: They were usually taken to be eternal, and as such they were regarded as the most noble existents. It was furthermore held that they had souls and intellects with which they cognized. All authors agreed that physical influences emanated from them on the material sublunar world: These heavenly influences were usually construed as the deity’s instruments through which He exercises His Providence over the sublunar world, including humankind. The fact that this lower world was not a chaos but followed some order was thus seen as due to the wholesome influences of the celestial bodies. The latter, however, were not taken to act on their own, but rather as God’s instruments.

The medieval study of the heavenly bodies straddled at least four disciplines: astronomy, natural philosophy, metaphysics, and astrology (including medical astrology), each of which reasoned from its own premises and problématiques. Medieval thinkers stood, as it were, at the crossroads of all these disciplinary traditions, and integrated the information they provided into their views of the cosmos.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy
From Antiquity through the Seventeenth Century
, pp. 302 - 361
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ma⼸ashar, Abū (2000). On Historical Astrology. The Book of Religions and Dynasties. 2 vols. Yamamoto, Keiji and Burnett, Charles (eds. and trans.). Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Al-Fārābī, (1985). Al-Fārābī on the Perfect State. Abū Nasr al-Fārābī’s Mabādi⼹ ārā⼹ ahl al-madīna al-fadila. Walzer, Richard (ed. and trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Fārābī, (1992). The Political Regime (also known as The Treatise on the Principles of Beings). Abed, Shukri B. (trans.). Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Al-Shahrastānī, (1923). Kitāb al-Milāl wal-Nihāl, Part II. Cureton, W. (ed.), Leipzig.Google Scholar
,Alexander of Aphrodisias (1992). Quaestiones 1.1-2.15. Sharples, R.W. (ed. and trans.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
,Alexander of Aphrodisias (1999). La provvidenza. Questioni sulla provvidenza. Fazzo, Silvia and Zonta, Mauro (ed. and trans.). Milano: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli.Google Scholar
,Alexander of Aphrodisias (2001). On the Cosmos. Genequand, Charles (ed. and trans.). Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
,Alexander of Aphrodisias (2003). Traité de la providence. Thillet, Pierre (ed. and trans.). Lagrasse: Verdier.Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander (1979–1980). “Gersonides’ Commentary on Averroes’ Epitome of Parva Naturalia, II, 3: Annotated Critical Edition,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research. 46–47:.Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander (2005). “Judah Halevi’s Theory of Climates,” Aleph. 5:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averroes, (1947). Rasā⼹il Ibn Rushd. Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Averroes, (1958). Averroes on Aristotle’s “De generatione et corruptione”: Middle Commentary and Epitome. Kurland, Samuel (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Averroes, (1992). Epitome del libro sobre la generación y la corrupción. Montada, Josep Puig (ed. and trans. and commentary). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientícas.Google Scholar
Averroes, (1998). Compendio de la metafisica: texto arabe con traduccíon y notas de Carlos Quirós Rodríguez. Madrid; 1919; reprinted with an introduction by Josep Puig Montada. Cordoba.Google Scholar
Baer, F.I. (1926). “Eine jüdische Messiasprophetie auf das Jahr 1186 und der dritte Kreuzzug,” Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums. 70:.Google Scholar
Bar Ḥiyya, Abraham (1720). Sefer Tzurat ha-Aretz. Jonathan, R. b. Joseph of Ruzhany (ed.). Offenbach.Google Scholar
Bar Ḥiyya, Abraham (1917). “Epistle to R. Judah of Barcelona,” Schwarz, Z. (ed.), in Krauss, S. (ed.), Festschrift Adolf Schwarz zum siebzigstem Geburtstag. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bar Ḥiyya, Abraham (1924). Megillat ha-Megalleh. Poznanski, A. and Guttmann, J. (eds.). Berlin.Google Scholar
Barton, Tamsyn S. (1994). Ancient Astrology. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shammai, Haggai (2004). “Saadya’s Introduction to Daniel: Prophetic Calculation of the End of Days vs. Astrological and Magical Speculation,” Aleph. 4:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biesterfeldt, Hans Hinrich (1973). “Galens Traktat ‘Dass die Kräfte der Seele den Mischungen des Körpers folgen’ in arabischer Übersetzung,” Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes. vol. 40 (4). Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Boll, Franz, Bezold, Carl, and Gundel, Wilhelm (1931). Sternglaube und Sterndeutung. Die Geschichte und das Wesen der Astrologie. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Boll, Franz (1922–1923). “Der Sternglaube in seiner historischen Entwicklung,” in Stegemann, V. (ed.), Kleine Schriften zur Sternkunde des Altertums. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Bos, Gerrit and Burnett, Charles (2000). Scientific Weather Forecasting in the Middle Ages. The Writings of al-Kindī. Studies, Editions, and Translations of the Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Texts. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Bouché-Leclerc, A. (1899). L⼹Astrologie grecque. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter (2001). Selected Poems of Solomon Ibn Gabirol, translated from the Hebrew. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cumont, Franz (1909). Les Religions orientales dans le paganisme romain. Paris: Ernest Leroux, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Cumont, Franz (1912). Astrology and Religion among the Greek and Romans. New York/London: G.P. Putnam’s (repr. 1960).Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. (1987). Proofs for Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. (1992a). Al-Fārābī, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. (1992b). “Gersonides on the Material and Active Intellects,” in Freudenthal 1992.Google Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. (2005). Moses Maimonides: The Man and his Works. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. (2000). “Further on a Problematic Passage in Guide of the Perplexed 2.24,” Maimonidean Studies. 4:.Google Scholar
Dillon, John (1996). The Middle Platonists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Drori, Rina (2000). Models and Contacts. Arabic Literature and its Impact on Medieval Jewish Culture. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne (1978). “Astronomie et astrologie selon Fārābī,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale. 20:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne (1981). “Al-Fārābī’s Causation of the Heavenly Bodies,” in Morewedge, Parviz (ed.), Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1965). Le système du monde, vol. 2. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Even Shmuel, Yehudah (1954). Midreshei Geulah. Tel Aviv: Mossad Bialik; 2nd ed. Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Feldman, Seymour (1967). “Gersonides’ Proofs for the Creation of the Universe,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research. 35:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. (1986). La révélation d⼹Hermès Trismégiste. vol. I: L⼹Astrologie et les sciences occultes. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (1994/1995). “‘The Air Blessed Be He and Blessed Be His Name’ in Sefer ha-Maskil by R. Shlomo Simha of Troyes: Some Characteristics of a Stoically-Inspired Midrashic-Scientific Cosmology of the Thirteenth Century,” Da⼸at. 32–33: and 34:.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (1995). Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance. Form and Soul, Heat and Pneuma. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (1996a). “Levi ben Gershom (Gersonides), 1288–1344,” in Nasr and Leaman 1996.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (1996b). “Stoic Physics in the Writings of R. Sa⼸adia Gaon al-Fayyumi and Its Aftermath in Medieval Jewish Mysticism,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 6:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (1998). “L⼹Héritage de la physique stoïcienne dans la pensée juive médiévale (Saadia Gaon, les Dévōts rhénans, Sefer ha-Maskil),” Revue de métaphysique et de morale. 4:.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (2000). “Providence, Astrology, and Celestial Influences on the Sublunar World in Shem-Tov ibn Falaquera’s De⼸ot ha-Filosofim,” in S. Harvey 2000a.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (2005a). Science in the Medieval Hebrew and Arabic Traditions. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (2005b). “Maimonides’ Philosophy of Science,” in Seeskin 2005a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (2006). “The Medieval Astrologization of The Aristotelian Cosmos: From Alexander of Aphrodisias to Averroes,” Mélanges de l⼹Université Saint-Joseph. 59:.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Léon (1909). “Une réforme du système astronomique de Ptolémée tentée par les philosophes arabes du XIIe siècle,” Journal Asiatique..Google Scholar
Gersonides, (1560). Milḥamot ha-Shem. Riva di trento.Google Scholar
Gersonides, (1866). Sefer Milḥamot ha-Shem. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Glasner, Ruth (2000). “The Question of Celestial Matter in the Hebrew Encyclopedias,” in S. Harvey 2000a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, B.R. and Pingree, D. (1990). Levi ben Gerson’s Prognostication for the Conjunction of 1345. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society.
Goldstein, B.R. (1985). The Astronomy of Levi ben Gerson (1288–1344): A Critical Edition of Chapters 1–20. Goldstein, Bernard R. (trans. and commentary). New York/Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, B.R. (1991). “Levi ben Gerson’s Astrology in Historical Perspective,” in Dahan 1991.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B.R. (1992). “Levi ben Gerson’s Contributions to Astronomy,” in Freudenthal 1992.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B.R. (2001). “Astronomy and the Jewish Community in Early Islam,” Aleph. 1:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressmann, Hugo (1925). Die hellenistische Gestirnreligion (Beihefte zum Alten Orient, Heft 5). Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Gundel, Wilhelm and Gundel, Hans Georg (1966). Astrologumena. Die astrologische Literatur in der Antike und ihre Geschichte (Sudhoffs Archiv. Beiheft 6). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Heath, Thomas Sir (1913). Aristarchus of Samos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibn Daud, Abraham (1852). Das Buch Emunah Ramah, oder: der Erhabene Glaube verfasst von Abraham Ben David Halevi aus toledo (im Jahr 1160). Weil, S. (ed. and trans.). Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Ibn Daud, Abraham (2001). Emunah Ramah. Ben-Joseph, Michael (ed.). Yosephshwili: n.p.Google Scholar
Jouana, Jacques (1999). Hippocrates. DeBevoise, M.B. (ed. and trans.). Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kellner, Menachem (1995). “Gersonides on Imitatio Dei and the Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.” Jewish Quarterly Review. 85: ;.Google Scholar
Kellner, Menachem (2003). “Bibliographia Gersonideana, 1992–2002,” Aleph. 3:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langermann, Y. Tzvi (1991). “Maimonides’ Repudiation of Astrology,” Maimonidean Studies. 2:.Google Scholar
Langermann, Y. Tzvi (1993). “Some Astrological Themes in the Thought of Abraham Ibn Ezra,” in Twersky, Isadore and Harris, Jay M. (eds.), Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra: Studies in the Writings of a Twelfth-Century Jewish Polymath. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Marilynn (2006). “Hellenistic Astrology,” in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (http://www.iep.utm.edu/a/astr-hel.htm)Google Scholar
Lemay, Richard (1962). Abu Ma⼸ashar and Latin Aristotelianism in the Twelfth Century. Beyrouth: American University of Beirut.Google Scholar
Levy, Raphael and Cantera, Francisco (1939). The Beginning of Wisdom. An Astrological Treatise by Abraham Ibn Ezra. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Loewe, Raphael (1979). “Ibn Gabirol’s Treatment of Sources in the Kether Malkhut,” in Stein, Siegfried and Loewe, Raphael (eds.), Studies in Jewish Religious and Intellectual History Presented to Alexander Altmann on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Longrigg, James (1975). “Elementary Physics in the Lyceum and Stoa,” Isis. 66:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimonides, (1963). The Guide of the Perplexed. 2 vols., Pines, Shlomo (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1988). Letters and Essays of Moses Maimonides. 2 vols. Shailat, I. (ed. and trans.). Ma⼸aleh Adumim. [Hebrew and Arabic]Google Scholar
Maimonides, (2000b). “Moses Maimonides. Epistle to Yemen (1172),” Kraemer, Joel L. (trans.), in Lerner 2000.Google Scholar
Mattock, J.M. and Lyons, M.C. (1969). On Endemic Diseases (Air, Waters and Places). Mattock, J.N. and Lyons, M.C. (eds. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moraux, Paul (1970). D⼹Aristote à Bessarion. Laval: Les Presses de l⼹Université de Laval.Google Scholar
Ptolemy, (1940). Tetrabiblos. Robbins, F.E. (ed. and trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, Marwan (2000). “Théodicée et approximation: Avicenne,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. 10:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, Roshdi (ed.) (1996). Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science. 3 vols. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochberg, Francesca (2004). The Heavenly Writing. Divination, Horoscopy, and Astronomy in Mesopotamian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaon, Saadia (1948). The Book of Beliefs and Opinions. Rosenblatt, Samuel (trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gaon, Saadia (1970). Kitāb al-Amānāt wa⼹l-⼹Itiqādāt. Qāfih, Yosef (ed.). Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Gaon, Saadia (1972a). Sefer Yezirah [Kitāb al-Mabādi] ⼸im Perush ha-Gaon Rabbenu Sa⼸adiah b. R. Yosef Fayyumī z.l. Qāfih, Yosef (ed.). Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. (1998). “Configuring the Universe: Aporetic, Problem Solving, and Kinematic Modeling as Themes of Arabic Astronomy,” Perspectives on Science. 6:.Google Scholar
Sabra, A.I. (1984). “The Andalusian Revolt against Ptolemaic Astronomy. Averroes and al-Bitrūjī,” in Mendelsohn, Everett (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences. Essays in Honor of I. Bernard Cohen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saliba, George (1999). “Critiques of Ptolemaic Astronomy in Spain,” Al-Qantara. 20:.Google Scholar
Scott, A. (1991). Origen and the Life of the Stars. A History of an Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sela, Shlomo (1999). Astrology and Biblical Exegesis in Abraham Ibn Ezra’s Thought. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Sela, Shlomo (2003). Abraham Ibn Ezra and the Rise of Medieval Hebrew Science. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Sela, Shlomo (2004). “Queries on Astrology Sent From Southern France to Maimonides: Critical Edition of the Hebrew Text, Translation, and Commentary,” Aleph. 4:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, Shlomo (2006). “Abraham Bar Ḥiyya’s Astrological Work and Thought,” Jewish Studies Quarterly13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. (1982). “Alexander of Aphrodisias, on Divine Providence : Two Problems,” Classical Quarterly. 32:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. (1983). “The Unmoved Mover and the Motion of the Heavens in Alexander of Aphrodisias,” Apeiron. 17:.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. (1987). “Alexander of Aphrodisias: Scholasticism and Innovation,” in Haasse, Wolfgang (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (ANRW), Teil II: Principat, vol. 36: Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik, 2. Teilband: Philosophie. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. (1994). “On Body, Soul and Generation in Alexander of Aphrodisias,” Apeiron 27:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohmaier, Gotthard (1997). “La question de l⼹influence du climat dans la pensée arabe et le nouveau commentaire de Galien sur le traité hippocratique des Airs, eaux et lieux,” in Hasnawi, Ahmad, Elamarni-Jamal, Abdelali and Aouad, Maroun (eds.), Perspectives arabes et médiévales sur la tradition scientifique et philosophique grecque. Louvain-Paris: Peeters, pp..Google Scholar
Tester, Jim (1987). A History of Western Astrology. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Thillet, Pierre (1984). “Matérialisme et théorie de l⼹āme et de l⼹intellect chez Alexandre d⼹Aphrodise,” Revue philosophique. 106:.Google Scholar
Weltecke, Dorothea (2003). “Die Konjunktion der Planeten im September 1186,” Saeculum: Jahrbuch fur Universalgeschichte. 54:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×