Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-ph4cd Total loading time: 0.618 Render date: 2022-07-06T02:43:43.301Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

20 - Epicurean ethics

from PART V - ETHICS AND POLITICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Michael Erler
Affiliation:
University of Würzburg
Keimpe Algra
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

On a goblet found in Boscoreale two philosophers are depicted as skeletons: Zeno the Stoic, and Epicurus. According to the inscription on the goblet they are engaged in discussion as to whether pleasure is the goal of all actions (telos). It is clear from Zeno's attitude that he is eagerly trying to persuade Epicurus. Epicurus is depicted in a rather more casual pose. His attention is concentrated less on the person opposite him than on a piece of cake lying on a table in front of him. This scene encapsulates the popular image of the two schools in a mixture of true insight and false understanding. The contrasting attitudes of the two philosophers in fact symbolize a fundamental distinction between Stoa and Garden: Zeno's tense bearing is appropriate as a representation of the Stoic school, whilst the casual pose suited the Epicureans. The Epicureans believed it was folly to dwell in the mind on evils which might possibly occur or have already occurred. In their view this leads to aggravation of our distress. Alleviation will result if as well as taking our minds off what troubles us (avocatio a cogitanda molestia) we give our attention to what brings pleasure (revocatio ad contemplandas voluptates) (Cic. Tusculanae disputationes III.32–3). But it is equally interesting to consider the misconception of Epicurean ethics which is suggested by the scene on the goblet. Epicurus allows himself to be distracted by a piece of cake; he is thus presented as honouring physical pleasures. As if to confirm this interpretation, at his feet a piglet is depicted, reminiscent of Horace's ironic description of himself as ‘a true hog of Epicurus’ herd’ (Hor. Ep. I.4.16).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angeli, A. (1986) ‘Compendi, eklogai, tetrapharmakos: due capitoli di dissenso nell'Epicureismo’, CErc 16.Google Scholar
Angeli, A., ed. (1988a) Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola (PHerc. 1005), La scuola di Epicuro 7 (Naples).Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1993a) The Morality of Happiness (New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method, Cornell studies in classical philology 42 (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1926) Epicurus. The Extant Remains (Oxford).Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).Google Scholar
Capasso, M., ed. (1988a) Carneisco: Il Secondo libro del Filista (PHerc. 1027) (Naples).Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1988b) ‘Gli epicurei e il potere della memoria (PHerc. 1041 e 1040)’, in Mandilaras, B. G. et al., edd., Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Congress of Papyrology I (Athens).Google Scholar
Chilton, C. W. (1960) ‘Did Epicurus approve of marriage? A study of Diogenes Laertius X, 119’, Phronesis 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. (1972) ‘Epicurus' Kuria doxa XVII’, GRBS 13.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1986) ‘The cults of Epicurus’, CErc 16.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1990) ‘The philosophical inscription of Diogenes of Oenoanda: New discoveries 1969–1983’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Diano, C. (1935) ‘Note epicuree’, SIFC 12.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1986b) ‘Philosophie-Fachwissenschaft-Allgemeinbildung’, in Flashar, & Gigon, (1986).Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. M. D. (1986) ‘Sic erimus cuncti… The Skeleton in Graeco-Roman Art’, JDAI 101.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans. Wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. & Althoff, J., edd., Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Erler, M. & Ungern-Sternberg, J. v. (1987) ‘κακòν γμναĩκ∊ς. Griechisches zu der Rede des Metellus Macedonius De prole augenda’, MH 44.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and philosophical recruitment in ancient Greece (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1986) ‘Nothing to us?’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1975) ‘“Philosophia medicans” in Filodemo’, CErc 5.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1981) Scetticismo e epicureismo. Per l'avviamento di un discorso storiografico, Elenchos 4 (Naples).Google Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1980) ‘Epicurus and the pleasure principle’, in Depew, D. J., ed. (1980) The Greeks and the Good Life (Indianapolis).Google Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1985) ‘Epicurean prolēpsis’, OSAP 3.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. & Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, I. (1969a) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleiting, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1969b) ‘Epicure et l'enseignement philosophique hellénistique et romain’, Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé (1968).Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1988) ‘Epicurus-hedonist malgré lui’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a).Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1991a) Epikur (Munich).Google Scholar
Jones, H. (1989) The Epicurean Tradition (London/New York).Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1971) ‘Epicurus’ doctrine of the soul’, Phronesis 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986b) ‘Pleasure and social utility – the virtues of being Epicurean’, in Flashar & Gigon (1986).Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. (1978) ‘La scuola di Epicuro’, CErc 8.Google Scholar
Manuwald, A. (1972) Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs, Habelts Dissertationsdrucke, Reihe klassische Philologie 15 (Bonn).Google Scholar
Merlan, Ph. (1960) Studies in Epicurus and Aristotle (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988a) Epicurus’ Ethical Theory, Cornell studies in classical philology 48 (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1986) ‘Therapeutic arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton).Google Scholar
Puglia, E. (1980) ‘Nuove letture nei PHerc. 1012 e 1786 (Demetrii Laconis opera incerta)’, CErc 10.Google Scholar
Puglia, E., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali e esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), La Scuola di Epicuro 8 (Naples).Google Scholar
Purinton, J. S. (1993) ‘Epicurus on the telos’, Phronesis 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbow, P. (1954) Seelenführung, Methodik der Exerzitien in der Antike (Munich).Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1972) Epicurus: An introduction (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1974) ‘Pleasure: 360–300 bc’, Phoenix 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1980) ‘Epicurus on friendship’, CPh 75.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. E. (1986) ‘How to be dead and not care: a defense of Epicurus’, APhQ 23.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics, PCPhS suppl. vol. 10 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1957) ‘Contritio und ultima linea rerum in neuen epikureischen Texten’, RhM 100.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1962) ‘Epikur’, in RAC Bd. 5 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Schmid, W. repr. in Erbse, H. & Küppers, J., edd. (1984) W. Schmid: Ausgewählte philologische Schriften (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. (1978) ‘Cicero's place in Roman philosophy: a study of his prefaces’, CJ 74.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1976a) ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’, in Bollack, & Laks, (1976).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1989a) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1996) ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’, in Giannantoni, & Gigante, (1996).Google Scholar
Smith, M. F., ed. (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, La scuola di Epicuro, suppl. 1 (Naples).Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1993) ‘Epicurean hedonism’, in Brunschwig, & Nussbaum, (1993) ; repr. in Striker, (1996).Google Scholar
Sudhaus, E. S. (1911) ‘Epikur als Beichtvater’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 14.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1987) ‘Una testimonianza del libro “Sul fine” di Epicuro?’, CErc 17.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A., ed. (1991) Polieno: Frammenti, La scuola di Epicuro 11 (Naples).Google Scholar
Usener, H., ed. (1887) Epicurea (Leipzig; repr. Stuttgart 1966).Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1987) ‘The justice of the Epicurean wise man’, CQ 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, N. P. (1985) ‘The role of physics in Stoic ethics’, in Epp, (1985).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995) Die Maske des Sokrates. Das Bild des Intellektuellen in der antiken Kunst (Munich).Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×