Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-wr4x4 Total loading time: 0.819 Render date: 2023-01-30T22:50:06.283Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

23 - The literature of the new sciences

from Part III - Histories: Writing in the New Movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2009

Get access



The period of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, familiar to students of literature as the age of Romanticism, has been named by some historians of science ‘the second Scientific Revolution’. The suggestion is of a transformation comparable in significance to the seventeenth-century movement in which Galileo, Descartes and Newton played prominent roles. In the earlier period, the earth had been recognized as a planet orbiting the sun, and natural philosophy reshaped by applying experimental and mathematical methods. The later period saw the emergence of new scientific disciplines, including geology, biology and physiology, and the reconfiguration of existing ones, especially physics and chemistry. Changes in disciplinary practices coincided with fundamental changes in scientific institutions. In Britain, the period also saw vigorous development of new means of popularization and new audiences; science attained a higher profile in the eyes of the general public than it had hitherto enjoyed. Scientific ideas circulated in general literate culture, communicated by public lectures in London and the provinces and periodicals and books addressed to middle-class readers. They even achieved a currency in working-class circles through the efforts of journalists, publishers and educators. The ‘scientist’ – to adopt the new term, first proposed by William Whewell at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1833 – was a figure in the public eye.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abernethy, John, Part of the Introductory Lecture for the Year 1815, London: Longman, 1815.
Aldini, John, An Account of the Late Improvements in Galvanism, London: Cuthell and Martin, and J. Murray, 1803.
[,Anon.], Review of Playfair, Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory, Edinburgh Review 1 (1802).
Averill, James, ‘Wordsworth and Natural Science: The Poetry of 1798’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology 77 (1978).Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris, In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity and Nineteenth-Century Writing, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.
Brooke, J. H., ‘Natural Theology and the Plurality of Worlds: Observations on the Brewster-Whewell Debate’, Annals of Science 34 (1977).Google Scholar
Brooke, J. H.,‘Nebular Contraction and the Expansion of Naturalism’, British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1979).Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen G., The History of Modern Science: A Guide to the Second Scientific Revolution, 1800–1950, Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1988.
Burke, Edmund, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful (1757), ed. Boulton, James T., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
Butler, Marilyn, ‘Culture’s Medium: The Role of the Review’, in Stuart Curran (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, Rebels, and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760–1830, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Cannon, Susan Faye, Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period, New York: Dawson, 1978.
Cantor, Geoffrey, ‘The Scientist as Hero: Public Images of Michael Faraday’, in Michael Shortland and Richard Yeo (eds.), Telling Lives in Science: Essays on Scientific Biography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Cardinal, Roger, ‘Romantic Travel’, in Roy Porter (ed.), Rewriting the Self: Histories from the Renaissance to the Present, London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
Carlyle, Thomas, Selected Writings, ed. Shelston, Alan, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1971.
Chambers, Robert, Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings (1844), ed. Secord, James A., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Clubbe, John, ‘The Tempest-toss’d Summer of 1816: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein’, The Byron Journal 19 (1991).Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The Philosophical Lectures of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. Coburn, Kathleen, New York: Philosophical Library, 1949.
Cooter, Roger, and Pumfrey, Stephen, ‘Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture’, History of Science 32 (1994).Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Davy, Humphry, ‘Discourse Introductory to a Course of Lectures on Chemistry’ (1802), in The Collected Works of Humphry Davy, ed. Davy, John, 9 vols., London: Smith, Elder, 1839–40, vol. II.
Davy, Humphry, Humphry Davy on Geology: The 1805 Lectures for the General Audience, ed. Siegfried, Robert and Dott, Robert H., Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1980.
Dean, Denis R., James Hutton and the History of Geology, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.
Deluc, Jean André, An Elementary Treatise on Geology, London: F. C. and J. Rivington, 1809.
Desmond, Adrian, ‘Artisan Resistance and Evolution in Britain, 1819–1848’, Osiris (2nd ser.) 3 (1987).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine and Reform in Radical London, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Dettelbach, Michael, ‘Humboldtian Science’, in N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary (eds.), Cultures of Natural History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Gillispie, C. C., Genesis and Geology: A Study in the Relations of Scientific Thought, Natural Theology, and Social Opinion in Britain, 1790–1850, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.
Golinski, Jan, ‘Humphry Davy’s Sexual Chemistry’, Configurations 7 (1999).Google Scholar
Golinski, Jan, Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Golinski, Jan, Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Grant, R., ‘Hutton’s Theory of the Earth’, in L. J. Jordanova and R. S. Porter (eds.), Images of the Earth: Essays in the History of the Environmental Sciences, Chalfont St Giles: British Society for the History of Science, 1979.
Howard, Luke, The Climate of London, Deduced from Meteorological Observations, 2 vols., London: W. Phillips, 1818–20.
Humboldt, Alexander von, Views of Nature: Or Contemplations on the Sublime Phenomena of Creation, trans. Otté, E. C. and Bohn, Henry G., London: Bohn, 1850.
Inkster, Ian, ‘Science and Society in the Metropolis: A Preliminary Examination of the Social and Institutional Context of the Askesian Society of London, 1796–1807’, Annals of Science 34 (1977).Google Scholar
Inkster, Ian, and Morrell, Jack (eds.), Metropolis and Province: Science in British Culture, 1780–1850, London: Hutchinson, 1983.
Jacyna, L. S., ‘Immanence or Transcendence: Theories of Life and Organization in Britain, 1790–1835’, Isis 74 (1983).Google Scholar
Jordanova, Ludmilla, Defining Features: Scientific and Medical Portraits, 1660–2000, London: Reaktion Books, 2000.
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgment (1790), trans. Pluhar, Werner S., Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.
Kipnis, Naum, ‘Luigi Galvani and the Debate on Animal Electricity, 1791–1800’, Annals of Science 44 (1987).Google Scholar
Kirwan, Richard, Geological Essays, London: T. Bensley, 1799.
Knight, David, ‘The Scientist as Sage’, Studies in Romanticism 6 (1967).Google Scholar
Lawrence, William, Lectures on Physiology, Zoology, and the Natural History of Man, London: J. Callow, 1819.
Leask, Nigel, ‘Mont Blanc’s Mysterious Voice: Shelley and Huttonian Earth Science’, in Elinor S. Shaffer (ed.), The Third Culture: Literature and Science, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998.
Levere, Trevor H., Poetry Realized in Nature: Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Early Nineteenth-Century Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
MacLeod, Christine, ‘James Watt, Heroic Invention and the Idea of the Industrial Revolution’, in Maxine Berg and Kristine Bruland (eds.), Technological Revolutions in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998.
Martineau, Harriet, The History of England during the Thirty Years’ Peace, 1816–1846, 2 vols., London: Charles Knight, 1849–50.
McNeil, Maureen, ‘The Scientific Muse: The Poetry of Erasmus Darwin’, in L. J. Jordanova (ed.), Languages of Nature: Critical Essays on Science and Literature, London: Free Association Books, 1986.
Mellor, Anne K., Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters, New York: Routledge, 1989.
Miller, David Philip, ‘ “Puffing Jamie”: The Commercial and Ideological Importance of being a “Philosopher” in the Case of the Reputation of James Watt (1736–1819)’, History of Science 38 (2000).Google Scholar
Money, John, ‘Joseph Priestley in Cultural Context: Philosophic Spectacle, Popular Belief and Popular Politics in Eighteenth-Century Birmingham’, Enlightenment and Dissent 7 (1988); 8 (1989).Google Scholar
Morrell, J. B., ‘Professors Robison and Playfair and the “Theophobia Gallica” ’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 26 (1971).Google Scholar
Morus, Iwan, Schaffer, Simon and Secord, James, ‘Scientific London’, in Celina Fox (ed.), London – World City, 1800–1840, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.
Nicolson, Malcolm, ‘Alexander von Humboldt and the Geography of Vegetation’, in Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Ospovat, Alexander M., ‘The Work and Influence of Abraham Gottlob Werner: A Reevaluation’, Actes du XIIIe Congrès International d’Histoire des Sciences, 1971 8 (1974).Google Scholar
Outram, Dorinda, ‘The Language of Natural Power: The éloges of Georges Cuvier and the Public Language of Nineteenth-Century Science’, History of Science 26 (1978).Google Scholar
Pancaldi, Giuliano, Volta: Science and Culture in the Age of Enlightenment, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Parkinson, James, Organic Remains of a Former World, 3 vols. in 1, London: Sherwood, Neely, and Jones, 1811.
Pratt, Mary Louise, Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation, London: Routledge, 1992.
Priestley, Joseph, Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air, 2nd edn, 3 vols., London: J. Johnson, 1775–7.
Priestley, Joseph, The History and Present State of Electricity with Original Experiments, 2nd edn, London: J. Dodsley, J. Johnson and J. Payne, and T. Cadell, 1769.
Reed, Arden, Romantic Weather: The Climates of Coleridge and Baudelaire, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1983.
Rehbock, Philip H., ‘Transcendental Anatomy’, in Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Reid, William Hamilton, The Rise and Dissolution of the Infidel Societies of this Metropolis, London: J. Hatchard, 1800.
Richards, Evelleen, ‘ “Metaphorical Mystifications”: The Romantic Gestation of Nature in British Biology’, in Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Richards, Robert J., The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Roe, Nicholas, ‘ “Atmospheric Air Itself ”: Medical Science, Politics, and Poetry in Thelwall, Coleridge, and Wordsworth’, in Cronin, Richard (ed.), 1789: The Year of the Lyrical Ballads, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998.
Rudwick, Martin J. S., Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
Rupke, Nicolaas, ‘A Geography of Enlightenment: The Critical Reception of Alexander von Humboldt’s Mexico Work’, in David N. Livingstone and Charles W. J. Withers (eds.), Geography and Enlightenment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Schaffer, Simon, ‘Genius in Romantic Natural Philosophy’, in Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Schaffer, Simon,‘Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century’, History of Science 21 (1983).Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon,‘The Nebular Hypothesis and the Science of Progress’, in James R. Moore (ed.), History, Humanity, and Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Schaffer, Simon,‘Priestley’s Questions: An Historiographical Survey’, History of Science 22 (1984).Google Scholar
Secord, James A., Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Shelley, Mary, Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, 3 vols., London: Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor, and Jones, 1818.
Smith, Bernard, ‘Coleridge’s Ancient Mariner and Cook’s Second Voyage’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 19 (1956).Google Scholar
Smith, Bernard, European Vision and the South Pacific, 2nd edn, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.
Snow, C. P., The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, intro. Collini, Stefan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Strickland, Stuart, ‘Galvanic Disciplines: The Boundaries, Objects, and Identities of Experimental Science in the Era of Romanticism’, History of Science 33 (1995).Google Scholar
Strickland, Stuart,‘The Ideology of Self-Knowledge and the Practice of Self-Experimentation’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998).Google Scholar
Temkin, Owsei, ‘Basic Science, Medicine, and the Romantic Era’, in Temkin, The Double Face of Janus and Other Essays in the History of Medicine, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.
Turney, Jon, Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
Wetzels, Walter D., ‘Johann Wilhelm Ritter: Romantic Physics in Germany’, in Cunningham, Andrew and Jardine, Nicholas (eds.), Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1963.
Wyatt, John, Wordsworth and the Geologists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Wylie, Ian, Young Coleridge and the Philosophers of Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
Yeo, R. R., ‘Genius, Method, and Morality: Early Victorian Images of Sir Isaac Newton’, Science in Context 2 (1988).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats