Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-dfw9g Total loading time: 0.453 Render date: 2022-08-11T05:44:35.718Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

5 - Drama

from PART II - EARLY REPUBLIC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Get access

Summary

THE ORIGINS OF ROMAN DRAMA

The Hellenistic theatre and Italy

After Menander's death (292 B.C.) the Greek theatrical profession, which had been primarily Athenian, became Panhellenic. Many Greek cities built or renovated theatres on a grand scale, and it is the remains of these, not of theatres of the classical period, that the traveller sees at such sites as Delos or Epidaurus. In the generation during which the scholar-poet Callimachus worked at Ptolemy's new ‘Museum’ in Alexandria, when the Sicilian Theocritus was composing his pastorals, and when the future father of Roman literature, the Greek Andronicus, was still a boy at Tarentum, the acting profession was acquiring a new prestige, even political power. The actors, musicians, and writers of tragedy and comedy were organized into ‘chapels’ or ‘conventicles’, θιασοι or συνοδοι, and they called themselves οι περι τον Διóνυσον τεχνιται ‘the Artists in the service of Dionysus’. Four ‘Guilds’ of the Artists emerged, each corresponding to a region of the Greek world; apart from regulating terms and rules for dramatic competitions, these organizations even behaved in some ways like independent states, and would negotiate rights of safe passage for their members with a city or federation. Thus the acting profession came to depend and to thrive on a ‘circuit’ of musical and dramatic festivals among which Athens was only one of several centres. New plays were still produced, but the emphasis shifted to a repertoire of classics – in comedy, Menander, Philemon, and Diphilus; in tragedy, Sophocles, Euripides, and the latter's imitators.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W. S. (1973). Accent and rhythm: prosodic features of Latin and Greek. Cambridge.
Arnott, W. G. (1970). ‘Phormio Parasitus’, G. & R. n.s. 17:.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1972). ‘Targets, techniques, and tradition in Plautus' Stichus’, B.I.C.S. 19:.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1975). Menander, Plautus, and Terence. Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics ix. Oxford.
Astin, A. E. (1967). Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.
Beare, W. (1964). The Roman stage. 3rd edn. London.
Bentley, R. (1726). ‘De metris Terentianis schediasma’, in P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cèbe, J.-P. (1960). ‘Le niveau culturel du public plautinien’, R.E.L. 38:.Google Scholar
Derow, P. S. (1973). ‘The Roman calendar, 190–168 B.C.’, Phoenix 27:.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1932/3). Plautinische Akzentstudien. 2 vols. Breslau.
Drexler, H. (1967). Einführung in die römische Metrik. Darmstadt.
Drexler, H. (1969). Die Iambenkürzung. Hildesheim.
Duckworth, G. E. (1952). The nature of Roman comedy. Princeton.
Enk, P. J. (1953).‘The Latin accent’, Mnemosyne 4.6:.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1927). ‘Zur Vorgeschichte des versus quadrants’, Hermes 62:.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1928). Iktus und Akzent im lateinischen Sprechvers. Berlin.
Fraenkel, E. (1960). Elementi plautini in Plauto, tr. Munari, F.. Florence. (Rev. version of Plautinisches im Plautus. Berlin 1922.)Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1968). Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos. Sussidi eruditi xxii. Rome.
Fraser, P. M. (1972). Ptolemaic Alexandria. 3 vols. Oxford.
Gaiser, K. (1970). ‘Die plautinischen Bacchides und Menanders Dis exapaton’, Philologus 114:.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. (1937). ‘Menander’, in Essays in Greek history and literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Haffter, H. (1935). Die altlateinische Dichtersprache. Problemata x. Leipzig.
Handley, E. W. (1968). Menander and Plautus. London.
Horsfall, N. M. (1976). ‘The Collegium Poetarum’, B.I.C.S. 23:.Google Scholar
Immisch, O. (1923). ‘Zur Frage der plautinischen Cantica’, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie (Phil.-Hist. Kl.) 14:. Abhandlung 41.Google Scholar
Jellicoe, S. (1968). The Septuagint and modern study. Oxford.
Jocelyn, H. D. (1969). ‘The poet Cn. Naevius, P. Cornelius Scipio, and Q. Caecilius Metellus’, Antichthon 3:.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1972). ‘The poems of Quintus Ennius’, Temporini, H., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin, 1972–) 1.2.Google Scholar
Lejay, P. (1925). Plaute. Paris.
Leo, F. (1897a). Die plautinischen Cantica und die hellenistische Lyrik. Berlin.
Leo, F. (1906). ‘Diogenes bei Plautus’, Hermes 41: (= Ausgewählte Kleine Schriften 1, Rome 1960).Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1912). Plautinische Forschungen. 2nd edn. Berlin.
Leo, F. (1913). Geschichte der römischen Literatur i: Die archaische Literatur. Berlin.
Lindsay, W. M. (1904). Ancient editions of Plautus. Oxford & St Andrews.
Lindsay, W. M. (1922). Early Latin verse. Oxford.
Ludwig, W. (1968). ‘The originality of Terence and his Greek models’, G.R.B.S. 9:.Google Scholar
Maas, P. and Lloyd-Jones, H. (tr.) (1962). Greek metre. Oxford.
MacCary, W. T. and Willcock, M. M. (1976). (eds.). Plautus, Casina. Cambridge.
Martin, R. H. (1976). (ed.). Terence, Adelphoe. Cambridge.
Mette, H.-J. (1964). ‘Die römische Tragödie’, Lustrum 9:.Google Scholar
Meyer, W. (1886). ‘Ueber die Beobachtung des Wortaccentes in der altlateinischen Poesie’, Abhandlungen der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil. -Hist. Kl.) 17:.Google Scholar
Michels, A. K. (1967). The calendar of the Roman Republic. Princeton.
Nougaret, L. (1943). ‘La métrique de Plaute et de Térence’, Mémorial des études latines … offert.… à J. Marouzeau. Paris.Google Scholar
Nougaret, L. (1948). Traité de métrique latine classique. Paris.
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of classical scholarship from the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic age. Oxford.
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W., The dramatic festivals of Athens. 2nd ed., rev. Gould, J.Lewis, D. M. (Oxford, 1968).
Questa, C. (1967). Introduzione alla metrica di Plauto. Rome.
Questa, C. (1970). ‘Alcune strutture sceniche di Plauto e Menandro’, in Ménandre, Entretiens Hardt xvi. Geneva.Google Scholar
Raven, D. S. (1965). Latin metre. London.
Rieth, C. (1964). Die Kunst Menanders in den Adelphen des Terenz. Hildesheim.
Schutter, K. H. E. (1952). Quibus annis comoediae Plautinae primum actae sint quaeritur. Groningen.
Shipp, G. P. (1953). ‘Greek in Plautus’, W.S. 66:.Google Scholar
Shipp, G. P. (1955). ‘Plautine terms for Greek and Roman things’, Glotta 34:.Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. M. (1967). Studies in the history of Hellenistic drama. London.
Suerbaum, W. (1968). Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter, Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Ennius. Hildesheim.
Taylor, L. R. (1937). ‘The opportunities for dramatic performances in the time of Plautus and Terence’, T.A.Ph.A. 68:.Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1970). Vortit barbare. Le traduzioni poetiche da Livio Andronico a Cicerone. Rome.
Trendall, A. D. (1967). Phlyax vases. B.I.C.S. Suppl. xix. 2nd edn. London.
Waszink, J.-H. (1972). ‘Zum Anfangsstadium der römischen Literatur’, Temporini, H., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin, 1972–) 1.2.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1971). Roman private law around 200 B.C. Edinburgh.
Williams, G. W. (1956). ‘Some problems in the construction of Plautus' Pseudolus’, Hermes 84:.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1958). ‘Evidence for Plautus' workmanship in the Miles Gloriosus’, Hermes 86:.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1968). Tradition and originality in Roman poetry. Oxford.
Wright, J. (1974). Dancing in chains: the stylistic unity of the comoedia palliata. Papers and monographs of the American Academy in Rome xxv. Rome.
14
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×