Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-qcsxw Total loading time: 3.811 Render date: 2022-08-17T14:18:54.368Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Part III - Implications for Talent Management and Impact on Employees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

Brian J. Hoffman
University of Georgia
Mindy K. Shoss
University of Central Florida
Lauren A. Wegman
University of Georgia
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ancona, D. (2011). Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In Snook, S., Nohria, N., & Khurana, R. (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership (pp. 319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceptualization of cultural intelligence: Definition, distinctiveness, and nomological network. In Ang, S. & Van Dyne, L. (Eds.), Handbook on cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement and applications (pp. 315). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backman, M. (2018, June 11). Job hopping: Why Millennials resign nearly twice as often as older workers. Retrieved September 5, 2018, from Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2009). The crossover of work engagement between working couples: A closer look at the role of empathy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 220236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R., Bechky, B. A., & Milliken, F. J. (2017). The changing nature of work: Careers, identities, and work lives in the 21st century. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3, 111115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 387419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belout, A., & Gauvreau, C. (2004). Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersin, J. N. (2018). 2018 Deloitte human capital trends report: The rise of the social enterprise. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Boudreau, J. W. (2012). Strategic I–O psychology lies beyond HR. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 8691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, J. W., & Ziskin, I. (2015). Black holes & white spaces: Reimagining the future of work and HR with the CHREATE Project. Alexandria, VA: HR People & Strategy.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., & Rhee, K. S. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory. In Bar-On, R. & Parker, J. D. A. (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory development, assessment, and application at home, school and in the workplace (pp. 343361). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93, 4050.Google Scholar
Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64, 225262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2016). The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 94, 5867.Google Scholar
Caveon Security Insights. (2013). The good and bad of online proctoring. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Chang, C. H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38, 81128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, M. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. (2010). Situational judgment tests: Constructs assessed and a meta‐analysis of their criterion‐related validities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 83117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. J., & Han, J. (2004). Exploring applicant pool quantity and quality: The effects of early recruitment practice strategies, corporate advertising, and firm reputation. Personnel Psychology, 57, 685717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, H. K., & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 325351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, C. (2017). Open-sourced AI: The next big step for the gig economy. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship.” Retrieved August 6, 2018 from Scholar
Development Dimensions International (DDI). (2015). Competency management at its most competent. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Dineen, B. R., & Allen, D. G. (2016). Third party employment branding: Human capital inflows and outflows following “Best Places to Work” certifications. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 90112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, L. (2017). The future of the project management role. Retrieved August 6, 2018 from Scholar
Driggs, W., & Rogers, E. (2018). Building trusted relationships through analytics and experience. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from$FILE/EY-building-trusted-relationships-through-analytics-and-experience.pdfGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit & SHRM Foundation. (2014). Future trends in HR and work. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Ell, K. (2017, August 9). It’s taking longer than ever to get hired, Glassdoor survey shows. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Ghasemaghaei, M., Ebrahimi, S., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Data analytics competency for improving firm decision making performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27, 221248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, I. L., Zedeck, S., & Schneider, B. (1993). An exploration of the job-analysis-content validity process. In Schmitt, N. and Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 334). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Mount, M. K., & Oh, I. S. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 12221243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, P. C. (1999). Building robust competencies: Linking human resource systems to organizational strategies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 8597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagel, J. III (2018, August 21). 3 kinds of jobs that will thrive as automation advances. Retrieved September 10, 2018, from Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE). (2015). Remote proctoring test delivery and trends: A report on options and considerations. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Joseph, D. L., Jin, J., Newman, D. A., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2015). Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 298342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self‐evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, J., Lajmi, M., & Hontalas, J. (2018). Next generation workforce: The new HR. Accenture. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2006). Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 146162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. W. (2018, March). What’s keeping HR up? Human Resource Executive. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. E. III (1994). From job‐based to competency‐based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. (2011). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 927940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, B. D., Hoffman, B. J., Bommer, W. H., Kennedy, C. L., & Hetrick, A. L. (2016). Off-duty deviance: Organizational policies and evidence for two prevention strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 463483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mankins, M. (2017, September 7). How leading companies build the workforces they need to stay ahead. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from Scholar
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016, October). Independent work: Choice, necessity, and the gig economy. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007, Spring). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Martone, D. (2003). A guide to developing a competency‐based performance‐management system. Employment Relations Today, 30, 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Anderson, N. R., Costa, A. C., & Ahmed, S. M. (2017). Applicant perspectives during selection: A review addressing “so what?,” “what’s new?,” and “where to next?” Journal of Management, 43, 16931725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., & Fleisher, M. S. (2008). Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: A meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 10421052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nga, J. K. H., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259282.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity–validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61, 153172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Staffing organizations: Contemporary practice and theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Priceonomics (2017). The data science diversity gap. Forbes. Retrieved September 4, 2018, from Scholar
Reynolds, D. H., McCauley, C. D., & Tsacoumis, S. (2018). A critical evaluation of the state of assessment and development for senior leaders. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, D., Patel, R., Bright, A., Gregory, D., & Gowing, M. K. (2002). Developing competency models to promote integrated human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 41, 309324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). A meta‐analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 10091037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, P. L., Huffcutt, A. I., & Bobko, P. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal, C., & Blasingame, D. (2015). Data journalism: An explication. ISOJ Journal, 6(1). Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Ryan, A. M., Ployhart, R. E., & Friedel, L. A. (1998). Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary note. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 298307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. M., & Tippins, N. T. (2004). Attracting and selecting: What psychological research tells us. Human Resource Management, 43, 305318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 254273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salm, L. (2017). 70% of employers are snooping candidates’ social media profiles. Retrieved September 6, 2018, from Scholar
Sanchez, C. (2018, April 26). Study: Colleges that ditch the SAT and ACT can enhance diversity. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2009). What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis? Human Resource Management Review, 19, 5363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B. et al. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53, 703740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silzer, R. & Jeanneret, R. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: A practice and science in search of common ground. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 270296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, P. (2008). Job analysis for a changing workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 8799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R. W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 4976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2015). SHRM research: Workforce readiness and skills shortages. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2016). The new talent landscape: Recruiting difficulty and skills shortages. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Soulier, E., & Caussanel, J. (2002). Narrative tools to improve collaborative sense-making. AAAI Technical Report WS-02-09. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Trautman, S., & McKee, M. (2014). The power of knowledge transfer: preserving your secret sauce while mitigating talent management risks. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice (1978). Adoption by four agencies of uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 3829038315.Google Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Lanivich, S. E., Roth, P. L., & Junco, E. (2016). Social media for selection? Validity and adverse impact potential of a Facebook-based assessment. Journal of Management, 42, 18111835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Putka, D. J., & Lanivich, S. E. (2011). Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 11671194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vollmer, C., Egol, M., & Sayani, N. (2014, Autumn). Reimagine your enterprise: Make human-centered design the heart of your digital agenda. Strategy+Business. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Wang, K. (2016). Why collaborate? Three frameworks to understand business–NGO partnerships. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44, 352386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
Zhang, V. (2017). Breaking down the gender gap in data science. Retrieved August 6, 2018, from Scholar
About LinkedIn. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from Scholar
Aeppel, T. (2015, February 24). What clever robots mean for jobs: Experts rethink belief that tech always lifts employment as machines take on skills once thought uniquely human. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 25, 2015, from Scholar
Alge, B. J., & Hansen, S. D. (2014). Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since 1984: A review and agenda. In Coovert, M. D. and Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 209237). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., and Hanson, G. H. (2016). The China shock: Learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 205–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, P. (2017, February 24). 5 steps to improve diversity recruiting. SHRM online. Retrieved February 26, 2017, from Scholar
Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 627652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, D. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2017). How technology is changing work and organizations. In Markoff, J. (Chair), The future of work. Symposium presented at the World Conference of Science Journalists, San Francisco, CA, October 2017.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2019). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Applied psychology in talent management (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2017). Technology-driven changes in work and employment. Communications of the ACM, 60(12), 6067.Google Scholar
Catalyst. (2016, August 11). Women in the workforce: United States. Retrieved from Scholar
Chaykowski, K. (2018, February 28). Facebook takes on LinkedIn and Glassdoor, expanding its job-posting tool to 40 countries. Forbes. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from Scholar
Colbert, A., Yee, N., & George, G. (2016). The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 731739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coovert, M. D., and Thompson, L. F. (Eds.). (2014). The psychology of workplace technology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Costanza, D., Badger, J., Fraser, R., Severt, J., & Gade, P. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deal, J. J. (2007). Retiring the generation gap. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dineen, B. R., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Internet recruiting 2.0: Shifting paradigms. In Yu, K. Y. T. & Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of recruitment, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 382401.Google Scholar
Doyle, A. (2017, January 31). Top 10 best job websites. Retrieved April 13, 2017, from Scholar
Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 569574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2014, February). What’s next: Future global trends affecting your organization. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Foundation.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, L. M., Ryan, K., and King, E. B. (2013). What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based meta-stereotypes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(6), 633657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Ghemawat, P. (2017). Globalization in the age of Trump. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 10–23.Google Scholar
Goler, L., Gale, J., Harrington, B., & Grant, A. (2018). Why people really quit their jobs. Harvard Business Review, January. Retrieved from Scholar
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Asplund, J. W. (2010). Causal impact of employee work perceptions on the bottom line of organizations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 378389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hom, P. W. (2011). Organizational exit. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 325–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
How to use social media for applicant screening. (2016, August 10). Retrieved October 12, 2016, from www. guides/pages/howtousesocialmediaforapplicantscreening.aspxGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M. (2015). Asians to surpass Hispanics as largest foreign-born group in US by 2055. Wall Street Journal, September 28. Retrieved from Scholar
Kandefer, K. (2017, January 14). 50 recruitment stats HR pros must know in 2017. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from Scholar
King, A. G., and Mrkonich, M. (2016, October 7). The legal risks of “big data”: What HR should know. Retrieved October 8, 2016, from Scholar
Landis, R. S., Earnest, D. R., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Realistic job previews: Past, present, and future. In Yu, K. Y. T. and Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of recruitment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 423436.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Hom, P., Eberly, M., & Li, J. (2018). Managing employee retention and turnover with 21st-century ideas. Organizational Dynamics, 47, 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LinkedIn talent solutions. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from Scholar
Loten, A. (2017). AI to drive job growth by 2020: Gartner. Wall Street Journal, December 15. Retrieved from Scholar
Lund, S., Ramaswamy, S, & Manyika, J. (2012). Preparing for a new era of work. McKinsey Quarterly, November. Retrieved from Scholar
Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, S139S157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., Ko, R., & Sanghvi, S. (2017, November) What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from Scholar
Maurer, R. (2016a, January 14). Internet is primary resource for job seekers worldwide. Retrieved January 26, 2016, from Scholar
Maurer, R. (2016b, February 2). The most sought-after talent prefer mobile recruitment. SHRM online. Retrieved February 14, 2016, from Scholar
Maurer, R. (2017a, February 23). 2017 recruiting trends point to technology driving change. SHRM online. Retrieved February 25, 2017, from Scholar
Maurer, R. (2017b, February 2). “Siri for recruiting” set to debut this year. SHRM online. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from Scholar
Maynard, M. T., Gilson, L., Jones-Young, N. C., and Vartiainen, M. (2017). Virtual teams. In Hertel, G., Stone, D., Johnson, R., and Passmore, J.. The psychology of the internet at work. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McAfee, A., and Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, October, pp. 60–67.Google Scholar
McGovern, M. (2017). Thriving in the gig economy: How to capitalize and compete in the new world of work. Wayne, NJ: Career Press/New Page Books.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute. (2016, February). Digital globalization: The new era of global flows. Retrieved April 7, 2016, from Scholar
Miller, S. (2016, March 21). Private companies typically award an incentive pay mix. SHRM online. Retrieved March 22, 2016, from Scholar
Murphy, M. (2017). Debrief: Ginni Rometty. Bloomberg Businessweek, September 25, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar
Murray, A. (2015, May 1). The new industrial revolution. Fortune, p. 6.Google Scholar
Olmstead, K., Lampe, C. & Ellison, N. B. (2016). Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from Scholar
Overberg, P., & Adamy, J. (2018). Elderly in US are projected to outnumber children for first time. Wall Street Journal, March 13, p. A2.Google Scholar
Oxford Living Dictionaries. Retrieved December 29, 2016, from Scholar
Parsi, N. (2017, January 16). Workplace diversity and inclusion gets innovative. SHRM online. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from Scholar
Phillips, J. M. (1998). Effects of realistic job previews on multiple organizational outcomes: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 673690.Google Scholar
Posthuma, R. A., and Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provencher, T. (2018, February 13). Viewpoint: How to encourage new employees to stick around. SHRM online. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from Scholar
PwC International. (2016). Millennials at work. Retrieved May 12, 2017, from Scholar
Qi, L. (2017). China lays out population forecast. Wall Street Journal, January 26, p. A7.Google Scholar
Rathi, N., & Lee, K. (2017). Understanding the role of supervisor support in retaining employees and enhancing their satisfaction with life. Personnel Review, 46, 16051619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. (2013). The benefits of big data. HRMagazine, October, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, . (2015). Myths about millennials. The Economist, August 1. Retrieved from Scholar
Silverman, R. E. (2016). Bosses tap outside firms to predict which workers might get sick. Wall Street Journal, February 16. Retrieved from Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management. (2016, January 19). Managing and leveraging workplace use of social media. SHRM online. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from samples/toolkits/Pages/managingsocialmedia.aspxGoogle Scholar
Spain, E., & Groysberg, B. (2016). Making exit interviews count. Harvard Business Review, April, 88–95.Google Scholar (2016). Social media for recruitment – infographic. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from Scholar
Statista. (2017). The most famous social network sites worldwide as of September 2017, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Retrieved January 10, 2018, from Scholar
Tanwar, K., & Prasad, A. (2016). Exploring the relationship between employer branding and employee retention. Global Business Review, 17(3S), 186S206S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The first world is aging. (2015). Fortune, October 1, p. 16.Google Scholar
Tian, X., Harvey, M., & Slocum, J. W. (2014). The retention of Chinese managers: The Chinese puzzle box. Organizational Dynamics, 43(1), 4452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Cadiz, D. M., & Hammer, L. B. (2015). Supporting the aging workforce: A review and recommendations for workplace intervention research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 351381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twenge, J. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 201210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015, December). Women in the labor force: A databook. Retrieved from Scholar
Volpone, S. D., Thomas, K. M., Sinisterra, P., and Johnson, L. (2014). Targeted recruiting: Identifying future employees. In Yu, K. Y. T. and Cable, D. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of recruitment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 110125.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2012). Meet the new boss: Big data. Companies trade in hunch-based hiring for computer modeling. Wall Street Journal, September 20, pp. B1, B2.Google Scholar
Weber, J. (2014). Should companies monitor their employees’ social media? Wall Street Journal, October 22. Retrieved May 17, 2015, from Scholar
World Economic Forum & Boston Consulting Group. (2011). Global talent risk – Seven responses. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, A. (2015). The Icarus syndrome meets the wearable revolution. Korn/Ferry Briefings on Talent and Leadership, 6, pp. 2733.Google Scholar
Wright, A. D. (2017a, March 6). Social postings still land employees in hot water. SHRM online. Retrieved March 8, 2017, from Scholar
Wright, A. D. (2017b, August 25). Job seekers are frustrated with automated recruiting. SHRM online. Retrieved August 26, 2017, from Scholar
Zielinski, D. (2015, October 1). 7 reasons to love your ATS. SHRM online. Retrieved October 3, 2015, from Scholar
Zielinski, D. (2016). An HRM for everyone. HR Magazine, 61(10), 4750.Google Scholar
Zielinski, D. (2017, February 13). Recruiting gets smart thanks to artificial intelligence. SHRM online. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from Scholar
Abu-Doleh, J., & Weir, D. (2007). Dimensions of performance appraisal systems in Jordanian private and public organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 7584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 219252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Akuratiyagamage, V. M. (2005). Identification of management development needs: A comparison across companies of different ownership – foreign, joint venture and local in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 15121528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atwater, L., Smither, J. W., Wang, M., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 876886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayers, R. S. (2013). Building goal alignment in federal agencies’ performance appraisal programs. Public Personnel Management, 42, 495520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, D. L. (1992). Impact of agency investment in the implementation of performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 92, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barua, A., & Viechnicki, P. (2017). Looking for convergence: How is the government workforce similar to the private sector? Deloitte Insights, April 26.Google Scholar
Becker, K., Antuar, N., & Everett, C. (2011). Implementing an employee performance management system in a nonprofit organization. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21, 255271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 283299.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouskila-Yam, O., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 137147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. C., & Warren, A. M. (2011). Performance management in unionized settings. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 96106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93, 4050.Google Scholar
Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, D. D., Fernaud, E. H., Díaz, R. I., Rodríguez, N. D., Vilela, L. D., & Sánchez, C. R. (2014). Factores relevantes para aumentar la precisión, la viabilidad y el éxito de los sistemas de evaluación del desempeño laboral. Papeles del Psicólogo, 35, 115121.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2016). The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 94, 5867.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2006). 10 global performance management systems. In Stahl, G. K. & Björkman, I. (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 176196). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., & Kemp, S. (2012). Lie hard: The effect of self-assessments on academic promotion decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 578589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, C., Harcourt, M., & Flynn, M. (2012). Clinical governance, performance appraisal and interactional and procedural fairness at a New Zealand public hospital. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 667678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, L., & Briscoe, D. (2009). Employee performance management across borders: A review of relevant academic literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 175196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins-Camargo, C., Chuang, E., McBeath, B., & Bunger, A. C. (2014). Private child welfare agency managers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of different performance management strategies. Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 133141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, A. L. (2017). Next generation performance management: The triumph of science over myth and superstition. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Dahling, J. J., Chau, S. L., & O’Malley, A. (2012). Correlates and consequences of feedback orientation in organizations. Journal of Management, 38, 531546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decramer, A., Smolders, C., & Vanderstraeten, A. (2013). Employee performance management culture and system features in higher education: Relationship with employee performance management satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 352371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2004). Performance management: A model and research agenda. Applied Psychology, 53, 556569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2, 253277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, A. J. (2013). Performance management coaching: Servant leadership and gender implications. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34, 204221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, M., & Walker, J. ((2016). Union membership in the United States. Spotlight on Statistics, US Bureau of Labor Statistics (September).Google Scholar
Effron, M., & Ort, M. (2010). One page talent management: Eliminating complexity, adding value. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. R. (2012). Exploring cultural dimensions as predictors of performance management preferences: The case of self-initiating expatriate New Zealanders in Belgium. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 20872107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fee, A., McGrath-Champ, S., & Yang, X. (2011). Expatriate performance management and firm internationalization: Australian multinationals in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49, 365384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Switzer, I. S. (2015). Forced distribution rating systems: When does “rank and yank” lead to adverse impact?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 180193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62, 3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2010). Employee coaching relationships: Enhancing construct clarity and measurement. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3, 109123.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: A multilevel examination of variables that impact employee coaching relationships. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63, 6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2012). Employee feedback orientation: Implications for effective coaching relationships. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5, 8699.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. B., Levy, P. E., & Jeffers, M. (2008). Development of a model of the feedback process within executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60, 4256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greguras, G. J., Robie, C., Schleicher, D. J., & Goff, M. III (2003). A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multisource ratings. Personnel Psychology, 56, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, V. Y., & St-Onge, S. (2012). Performance management effectiveness: Practices or context? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 11581175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, B. G., & Vorauer, J. D. (2003). Seeing through the screen: Is evaluative feedback communicated more effectively in face-to-face or computer-mediated exchanges? Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (1995). Changing conceptions and practices in performance appraisal. In Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 451481). San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hernandez, M., Avery, D. R., Tonidandel, S., Hebl, M. R., Smith, A. N., & McKay, P. F. (2016). The role of proximal social contexts: Assessing stigma-by-association effects on leader appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 6885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2009). Disentangling the meaning of multisource performance rating source and dimension factors. Personnel Psychology, 62, 735765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 321368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inderrieden, E. J., Allen, R. E., & Keaveny, T. J. (2004). Managerial discretion in the use of self-ratings in an appraisal system: The antecedents and consequences. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 460482.Google Scholar
Irs, R., & Turk, K. (2012). Implementation of the performance-related pay in the general education schools of Estonia. Employee Relations, 34, 360393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacik, A. (2017, October). Healthcare industry to create four million jobs by 2026. Modern Healthcare. Scholar
Kamer, B., & Annen, H. (2010). The role of core self-evaluations in predicting performance appraisal reactions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, P., Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2007). Understanding performance appraisal fairness. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 132150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeping, L. M. & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85,708723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinicki, A. J., Jacobson, K. J., Peterson, S. J., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Development and validation of the performance management behavior questionnaire. Personnel Psychology, 66, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B. J., & McKee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 10571069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, H. J., Snell, S. A., & Wexley, K. N. (1987). Systems model of the performance appraisal interview process. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 26, 267280.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, A., van Tuijl, H., & Algera, J. A. (2004). Participation in the design of performance management systems: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 831851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & Nir, D. (2010). The feedforward interview. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, D. (2000). Changing organizations: Business networks in the new political economy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krauss, A., & Snyder, L. A. (2009). Technology and performance management: What role does technology play in performance management? In Smither, J. W. & London, M. (Eds.), Performance management: Putting research into action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kurtzberg, T. R., Naquin, C. E., & Belkin, L. Y. (2005). Electronic performance appraisals: The effects of e-mail communication on peer ratings in actual and simulated environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 216226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, G. P., Budworth, M., Yanar, B., & Whyte, G. (2008). The influence of a manager’s own performance appraisal on the evaluation of others. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 220228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. E. (2003). Reward practices and performance management system effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 396404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. E., & McDermott, M. (2003). Current performance management practices: Examining the varying impacts. World at Work Journal, 12, 4960.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, S. (2016). After overhauling its performance review system, IBM now uses an app to give and receive real-time feedback. Business Insider, May 20. Retrieved from Scholar
Lee, G., & Jimenez, B. S. (2011). Does performance management affect job turnover intention in the federal government? American Review of Public Administration, 41, 168184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, P. E., Tseng, S. T., Rosen, C. C., & Lueke, S. B. (2017). Performance management: A marriage between practice and science – Just say “I do.” In Buckley, M. R., Wheeler, A. R., & Halbesleben, J. R. B. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management , Vol. 35 (pp. 155213). Bingley, West Yorkshire, England: Emerald Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, F., Conway, J. M., & De Corte, W. (2008). The relative importance of task, citizenship and counterproductive performance to job performance ratings: Do rater source and team-based culture matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the feedback orientation scale (FOS). Journal of Management, 36, 13721405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 81100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamatoglu, N. (2008). Effects on organizational context (culture and climate) from implementing a 360-degree feedback system: The case of Arcelik. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 426449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medcof, J. W., & Song, L. J. (2013). Exploration, exploitation and human resource management practices in cooperative and entrepreneurial HR configurations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 29112926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. S. (2003). High tech and high performance: Managing appraisal in the information age. Journal of Labor Research, 24, 409424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mok, A., Cheng, C. Y., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Matching versus mismatching cultural norms in performance appraisal: Effects of the cultural setting and bicultural identity integration. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10, 1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, K. Y., Koh, C., Ang, S., Kennedy, J. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism–collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 10331044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris-Watts, C., & Levy, P. E. (2004). The mediating role of affective commitment in the relation of the feedback environment to work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 351365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurse, L. (2005). Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational justice: Exploring the linkages. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 11761194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., Boswell, W. R., Schroeder, A. N., & Stine-Cheyne, K. J. (2009). Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 526544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, S. C., & Mendoza, A. (2017, April). Performance ratings: Does case law reveal more harm than good? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Peretz, H., & Fried, Y. (2012). National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: A study across 21 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 448459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, S. A. (2006). Attitudes of Malaysian teachers toward a performance-appraisal system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 30313042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, R., & Sharples, D. (2012). The impact of rater agreeableness and rating context on the evaluation of poor performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 4259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rego, A., Marques, C., Leal, S., Sousa, F., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2010). Psychological capital and performance of Portuguese civil servants: Exploring neutralizers in the context of an appraisal system. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 15311552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodwell, J. J., & Teo, S. T. T. (2008). The influence of strategic HRM and sector on perceived performance in health services organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 18251841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, M. A., Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S. (2011). Managing adaptive performance in teams: Guiding principles and behavioral markers for measurement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffie-Robertson, M. C., & Brutus, S. (2014). The impact of interdependence on performance evaluations: The mediating role of discomfort with performance appraisal. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 459473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018). Putting the system into performance management systems: A review and agenda for performance management research. Journal of Management, 44, 22092245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, D. J., Bull, R. A., & Green, S. G. (2009). Rater reactions to forced distribution rating systems. Journal of Management, 35, 899927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvarajan, T. T., & Cloninger, P. A. (2012). Can performance appraisals motivate employees to improve performance? A Mexican study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 30633084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, T. H., & Tashchian, A. (2002). Accountability forces in performance appraisal: Effects of self-appraisal information, normative information, and task performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 261274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, T. H., & Tashchian, A. (2007). Effects of feedback accountability and self-rating information on employee appraisals: A replication and extension. Psychological Reports, 100, 10911100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, A., & Purang, P. (2011). Employee perceptions of performance appraisals: A comparative study on Indian banks. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 632647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, P., & Tosi, H. L. (2004). Determinants of the anonymity of the CEO evaluation process. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 87102.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Mohamed, A. F., & Darwish, T. (2013). A comparative study of performance appraisals, incentives and rewards practices in domestic and multinational enterprises in the country of Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 35773598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta‐analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 3366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 165184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2009). Identifying acceptable performance appraisal criteria: An international perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47, 102125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, C., & Wang, W. (2013). Exploring the factors associated with employees’ perceived appraisal accuracy: A study of Chinese state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 21972220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012). Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 41, 756776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tziner, A., Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J. N., & Roberts-Thompson, G. P. (2001). Relationships between attitudes toward organizations and performance appraisal systems and rating behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 226239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Nijhof, A. H. J. (2004). The value of subjectivity: Problems and prospects for 360-degree appraisal systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Leeuw, R. M., Overeem, K., Arah, O. A., Heineman, M. J., & Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H. (2013). Frequency and determinants of residents’ narrative feedback on the teaching performance of faculty: Narratives in numbers. Academic Medicine, 88, 13241331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varma, A., Pichler, S., & Srinivas, E. S. (2005). The role of interpersonal affect in performance appraisal: Evidence from two samples – the US and India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 20292044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Tseng, J., Yen, Y., Huang, I. (2011). University staff performance evaluation systems, organizational learning, and organizational identification in Taiwan. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 4354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44, 352386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 125139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, M. J. (1997). Performance appraisal is dead. Long live performance management. Harvard Management Update, 2, 16.Google Scholar
Woehr, D. J., Sheehan, M. K., & Bennett, W. (2005). Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: A multitrait–multirater approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 592600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youngcourt, S. S., Leiva, P. I., & Jones, R. G. (2007). Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- and position-focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 315343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215234. doi: 10.1287/orsc. Scholar
Baldwin, T. T., Ford, J. K., & Blume, B. D. (2017). The state of transfer of training research: Moving toward more consumer‐centric inquiry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28, 1728. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2007). How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement and worker skills. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 17211758. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, M. E. (2008). International review of industrial and organizational psychology. In Hodgkinson, G. P. & Ford, J. K. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2008. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., Teachout, M. S., & Cox, C. B. (2012). The training and development of an aging workforce. In Borman, W. C. & Hedge, J. W. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 436453). New York, NY: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, S. I., Ford, J. K., Noe, R. A., & Kraiger, K. (2017). 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 305323. doi: 10.1037/apl0000142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994). Changes in the demand for skilled labor within US manufacturing: evidence from the annual survey of manufactures. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 367397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 12271274. doi: 10.1037/bul0000067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, A., Mendenhall, M., Stevens, M. J., & Oddou, G. (2010). Defining the content domain of intercultural competence for global leaders. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 810828. doi: 10.1108/02683941011089107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. S., & Mendenhall, M. (1990). Cross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research. Academy of Management Review, 15, 113136. doi: 10.2307/258109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, R., Cappelli, P., & Hamori, M. (2013). Labor market intermediaries and the new paradigm for human resources. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 339390. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.774213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothby, D., Dufour, A., & Tang, J. (2010). Technology adoption, training and productivity performance. Research Policy, 39, 650661. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (2005). Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management, 44, 129136. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics (No. w24001). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w24001Google Scholar
Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2008). A study of best practices in training transfer and proposed model of transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19, 107128. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 8694. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, J. S., Kiker, D. S., & Cross, T. (2003). Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. Journal of Management, 29, 663680. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00029-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Rhodenizer, L., Salas, E., & Bowers, C. A. (1998). A framework for understanding pre‐practice conditions and their impact on learning. Personnel Psychology, 51, 291320. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00727.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnevale, A. P., Strohl, J., & Gulish, A. (2015). College is just the beginning: Employers’ role in the $1.1 trillion postsecondary education and training system (Report No. ED558166). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved from Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2019). Training trends: Macro, micro, and policy issues. Human Resource Management Review, 29, 284297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349375. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, N. (2009). Skill acquisition in older adults: Psychological mechanisms. In Czaja, S. J. & Sharit, J. (Eds.), Aging and work (pp. 232258). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chebium, R. (2015, January 7). How to create an effective cross-cultural training program. Retrieved from Scholar
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835847. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 945974. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R., Rebele, R., & Grant, A. (2016). Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review, 94, 7479.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 14.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2018). Charge statistics. Retrieved from Scholar
Gatta, M. (2008). Low-skill workers, technology, and education: A new vision for workforce development policy. Economic & Labour Relations Review, 19, 109127. doi: 10.1177/103530460801900108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, K. J. (1993). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.Google Scholar
Haccoun, R. R., & Hamtiaux, T. (1994). Optimizing knowledge tests for inferring learning acquisition levels in single group training evaluation designs: The internal referencing strategy. Personnel Psychology, 47, 593604. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01739.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, C., & Mogford, E. (2009). Immigration and the American industrial revolution from 1880 to 1920. Social Science Research, 38, 897920. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A. M., Gregory, M. E., Joseph, D. L., Sonesh, S. C., Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., … & Salas, E. (2016). Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 12661304. doi: 10.1037/apl0000120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Job, M. A., & Ogalo, H. S. (2012). Micro-learning as innovative process of knowledge strategy. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 1(11). Retrieved from Scholar
Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 5969. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. (Original work published 1959.)Google Scholar
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2002). Decision-based evaluation. In Kraiger, K. (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and maintaining effective training and development: State-of-the-art lessons for practice (pp. 331375). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2008). Transforming our models of learning and development: Web‐based instruction as enabler of third‐generation instruction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 454467. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00086.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2014). Looking back and looking forward: Trends in training and development research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25, 401408. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubeck, J. E., Delp, N. D., Haslett, T. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Does job-related training performance decline with age? Psychology and Aging, 11, 92107. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacerenza, C. N., Reyes, D. L., Marlow, S. L., Joseph, D. L., & Salas, E. (2017). Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi: 10.1037/apl0000241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N., & Armstrong, M. B. (2017). Enhancing instructional outcomes with gamification: An empirical test of the Technology-Enhanced Training Effectiveness Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 499507. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, H., Lee, S.-G., & Nam, K. (2007). Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 27, 2235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, T. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style, and your life. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Martin, H. J. (2010). Workplace climate and peer support as determinants of training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 87104. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 371383. doi: 10.3102/00346543049002371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGovern, M. (2017). Thriving in the gig economy: How to capitalize and compete in the new world of work. Wayne, NJ: Career Press.Google Scholar
Moseley, J. L., & Dessigner, J. C. (2007). Training older workers and learners: Maximizing the performance of an aging workforce. San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 281292. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736749. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1986.4283922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noe, R. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2002). Planning for training impact: Principles of training effectiveness. In Kraiger, K. (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development (pp. 5379). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ouadahi, J. (2008). A qualitative analysis of factors associated with user acceptance and rejection of a new workplace information system in the public sector: A conceptual model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25, 201213. doi: 10.1002/cjas.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PayScale (2016). 2016 workforce-skills preparedness report. Seattle, WA: PayScale, Inc. Retrieved from Scholar
Phillips, J. J. (2012). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 199220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiñones, M. A., Ford, J. K., Sego, D. J., & Smith, E. M. (1995). The effects of individual and transfer environment characteristics on the opportunity to perform trained tasks. Training Research Journal, 1, 2948.Google Scholar
Rau, B. L., & Hyland, M. A. M. (2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55, 111136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00105.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T., & Tan, R. Y. (2012). Effective diversity training. In Roberson, Q. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 341365). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business Communication Quarterly, 75, 453465. doi: 10.1177/1080569912460400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471499. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74101. doi: 10.1177/1529100612436661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., & Smith, B. J. (2014). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Simon, S. J., & Werner, J. M. (1996). Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 648659. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, P. (2008). Job analysis for a changing workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 8799. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitzmann, T., Bell, B. S., Kraiger, K., & Kanar, A. M. (2009). A multilevel analysis of the effect of prompting self‐regulation in technology‐delivered instruction. Personnel Psychology, 62, 697734. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01155.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623664. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 303327. doi: 10.1177/1046496408317794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, D., & Franklin, J. C. (2012). Overview of projections to 2020. Monthly Labor Review, 135(1), 320.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759769. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toossi, M. (2012). Projections of the labor force to 2050: A visual essay. Monthly Labor Review, 135(10), 316.Google Scholar
Tracey, J. B., Hinkin, T. R., Tannenbaum, S., & Mathieu, J. E. (2001). The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 523.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. E., Cavanagh, T. M., & Kraiger, K. (2014). Older adults and technology-based instruction: Optimizing learning outcomes and transfer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 2644. doi: 10.5465/amle.2012.0056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. E., & Kraiger, K. (2014). Cognitive aging and training: The role of instructional coherence and advance organizers. Experimental Aging Research, 40, 164186. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.882206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, B. (2006). Demand for skills in Canada: the role of foreign outsourcing and information‐communication technology. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 39(1), 5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C. K. (2017). Age and training: A meta-analysis examining training features (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (Accession No. 2018-13260-247).Google Scholar
Alton, L. (2018, January 24). Why the gig economy is the best and worst development for workers under 30. Forbes. Retrieved from Scholar
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. (2018). Pay Equity & Discrimination. Retrieved June 21, 2018, from Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & Einstein, W. O. (1988). Transformational leadership in a management game simulation. Group & Organization Management, 13(1), 5980.Google Scholar
Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2014). How does supervisory family support influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. Journal of Management, 40(4), 11231150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E. (1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, 238263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. (n.d.). STEM 101: Intro to tomorrow’s jobs. Retrieved from Scholar
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for American Progress. (2017). The women’s leadership gap. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Wade, M., & Jordan, J. (2018). As AI makes more decisions, the nature of leadership will change. Harvard Business Review, 2–7. Retrieved from Scholar
Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 4556.Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, M. A., Korsgaard, M. A., Welpe, I. M., Picot, A., & Wigand, R. T. (2014). The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 771783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managed work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435457.Google Scholar
Dussauge, P., & Garrette, B. (1999). Cooperative strategy: Competing successfully through strategic alliances. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dvir, T., & Shamir, B. (2003). Follower developmental characteristics as predicting transformational leadership: A longitudinal field study. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 327344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist, (2017). The future of work. Artificial intelligence: Anything you can do, AI can do better. So how will it change the workplace? Retrieved June 22, 2018, from Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2014). What’s next: Future global trends affecting your organization. Evolution of work and the worker. New York, NY: SHRM Foundation and Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7, 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Personnel Psychology, 37, 16.Google Scholar
Forbes Coaches Council (2017). What can your organization do to become more innovative? Retrieved June 12, 2018, from Scholar
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Retrieved from Scholar
Fried, J., & Hansson, D. H. (2013). Remote: Office not required. London, UK: The Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, W. A., Griggs, T. L., Deal, J. J., Mondore, S. P., & Cox, B. D. (2011). A comparison of generational differences in endorsement of leadership practices with actual leadership skill level. Consulting Psychology Journal, 63(1), 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, F., Rico, R., Alcover, C. M., & Barrasa, Á. (2005). Change‐oriented leadership, satisfaction and performance in work groups. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 312328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, M. (2018). Six cyber threats to really worry about in 2018. Retrieved June 12, 2018, from Scholar
Global Alliance Game | Carpenter Strategy Toolbox. (2012). Retrieved July 24, 2018, from Scholar
Golden, T. D. (2006). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 176187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting’s differential impact on work–family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 13401350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: the rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Grinyer, P. H., Mayes, D., & McKiernan, P. (1990). The sharpbenders: Achieving a sustained improvement in performance. Long Range Planning, 23, 116125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In Stogdill, R. M. & Coons, A. E. (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus, OH: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Hand, H. H., & Slocum, J. W. (1972). A longitudinal study of the effect of a human relations training program on managerial effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 412418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, D. H. (2013). A new workplace manifesto: In praise of freedom, time, space, and work. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from Scholar
Hassan, R., Prussia, G., Mahsud, R., & Yukl, G. (2018). How leader networking, external monitoring, and representing are relevant for effective leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(4), 454467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, S. (2016). The modern challenges of managing remote performance. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from Scholar
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1984). The management of organizational behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., & Lyons, B. D. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 347381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, R. J. (1971). A path–goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 3651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, R. L. (1955). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 33–42.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. K. (2015). The aging workforce: Four steps to maximize older workers in your organization. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Kenan-Flager Business School, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Kim, H., & Yukl, G. (1995). Relationships of self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors to managerial effectiveness and advancement. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 361377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2018). Organizational behavior: A practical, problem-solving approach (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Knight, R. (2015). How to manage remote direct reports. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2–6. Retrieved from Scholar
Kolbjørnsrud, V., Amico, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2016). How artificial intelligence will redefine management. Harvard Business Review, July, 1–7. Retrieved from Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Hammer, L. B., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2014). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support, workplace social support and work–family conflict construct definitions and linkages. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 115.Google Scholar
Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager, 19, 6576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. (1979). The application of social learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 857861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 13721395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J. W., Lyons, B. D., & Cho, J. (2010). Is the full-range model of leadership really a full-range model of effective leader behavior? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4), 493507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J. W., & Tews, M. J. (2016). Does leader–member exchange accentuate the relationship between leader behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J. W., Tews, M. J. & Allen, D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 29, 98110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Misumi, J., & Peterson, M. (1985). The performance-maintenance (PM) theory of leadership: Review of a Japanese research program. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 198223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, T. V., Campion, M. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 154166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortman, J. M., Velkoff, V. A., & Hogan, H. (2014). An aging nation: The older population in the United States population estimates and projections current population reports. Retrieved from Scholar
Roberts, K., Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Managing the global workforce: Challenges and strategies. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 93106.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personal Psychology, 40, 437453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A. N., & Subirats, M. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 220229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifert, C. F., & Yukl, G. (2010). Effects of repeated multi-source feedback on the influence behavior and effectiveness of managers: A field experiment. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 856866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHRM Foundation (2014a). The aging workforce – state of older workers in US organizations. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
SHRM Foundation (2014b). What’s next: Future global trends affecting your organization. Evolution of work and the worker. New York, NY: Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
Strauss, K. (2017, March 8). 10 great “gig economy” jobs for 2017. Forbes. Retrieved from Scholar
Tkaczyk, C. (2013). Marissa Mayer breaks her silence on Yahoo’s telecommuting policy. Fortune. Retrieved July 19, 2018, from Scholar
Toossi, M. (2016). A look at the future of the US labor force to 2060. Spotlight on Statistics: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved June 22, 2018, from Scholar
UK Essays, (2015). Why have strategic alliances grown in popularity? Retrieved June 13, 2018, from Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2017). Educational attainment in the United States. Retrieved June 21, 2018, from Scholar
Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J. (2011). The changing nature of work: What’s in it for me? Retrieved June 22, 2018, from www.Slideshare.Net/Jpware/The-Changing-Nature-Of-Work-Whats-In-It-For-MeGoogle Scholar
Wegman, L. A., Hoffman, B. J., Carter, N. T., Twenge, J. M., & Guenole, N. (2018). Placing job characteristics in context: Cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. Journal of Management, 44(1), 352386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 6685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2005). Why integrating the leading and managing roles is essential for organizational effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 361375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible, adaptive leadership is important. Consulting Psychology Journal, 62(2), 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J. A., Thor, K. K., & Mumford, M. D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perspectiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 317342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackers, M. (2017). One unit standing together: Police and firefighters learned from past tragedies, using different tactic to save lives. Las Vegas Sun, October 22. Retrieved from Scholar
Aime, F., Humphrey, S., DeRue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 327352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asencio, R., Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Fiore, S. M. (2012). Charting a course for collaboration: A multiteam perspective. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4), 487494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 9891004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, T. E., & Plowman, D. A. 2014. Temporary, emergent interorganizational collaboration in unexpected circumstances: A study of the Columbia space shuttle response effort. Organization Science, 25, 12341252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G., Colaneri, A., & Outland, N. (2018). Team composition and the ABCs of teamwork. American Psychologist, 73(4), 349362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertolotti, F., Mattarelli, E., Mortensen, M., O’Leary, M., & Incerti, V. (2013). How many teams should we manage at once? The effect of multiple team membership, collaborative technologies, and polychronicity on team performance. 34th International Conference on Information Systems, December 15–18, 2013. Association for Information Systems, Milan, Italy. Retrieved from Scholar
Bui, L., Zapotosky, M., Barrett, D., & Berman, M. (2017). At least 59 killed in Las Vegas shooting rampage, more than 500 others injured. Washington Post, October 2. Retrieved from Scholar
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 11891207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, J. (2013). The quiet professional: An investigation of US military explosive ordnance disposal personnel interactions with everyday field robots (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 12171234.Google Scholar
Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Braun, M. T., & Contractor, N. S. (2015). Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 597622. Scholar
Connaughton, S. L., Williams, E. A., & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Social identity issues in multiteam systems: Considerations for future research. In Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organization form for dynamic and complex environments (pp. 109140). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Contractor, N. (2013). Some assembly required: Leveraging Web science to understand and enable team assembly. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120385. doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, J., Oh, E. Y., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Masters, K., Greenhill, A., ... & Holmes, K. (2015). Defining and measuring success in online citizen science: A case study of Zooniverse projects. Computing in Science & Engineering, 17(4), 2841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen-Lester, K. L., Maupin, C. K., & Carter, D. R. (2017). Incorporating social networks into leadership development: A conceptual model and evaluation of research and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 130152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, S., Chellali, A., Jaffre, I., Classe, J., & Cao, C. G. (2013). Effects of experience and workplace culture in human–robot team interaction in robotic surgery: A case study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 7588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, R. B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Barnes, C. M., Sleesman, D. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2012). Coordinated action in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 808824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 857880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2006). Leadership in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 311329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627647.Google Scholar
De Vries, T. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Davison, R. B., Walter, F., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2016). Managing coordination in multiteam systems: Integrating micro and macro perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 18231844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Onfro, J. (2018, March 18). These Google employees used their “20 percent” time to improve Maps for people in wheelchairs. Business Insider. Retrieved from Scholar
Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., & Harvey, J. F. (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 347360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, B. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Miles, J. E., Ilgen, D. R., & Barnes, C. M. (2015). Same page, different books: Extending representational gaps theory to enhance performance in multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 813835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortson, L., Masters, K., Nichol, R., Borne, K., Edmondson, E., Lintott, C., ... & Wallin, J. (2012). Galaxy zoo: Morphological classification and citizen science. In Way, M. J., Scargle, J. D., Ali, K. M., & Srivastava, A. N. (Eds.), Advances in machine learning and data mining for astronomy (pp. 213236). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Griffith, J. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2016). Collective leadership behaviors: Evaluating the leader, team network, and problem situation characteristics that influence their use. Leadership Quarterly, 27, 312333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 933958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(20), 135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittell, J. H., Godfrey, M., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2013). Interprofessional collaborative practice and relational coordination: Improving healthcare through relationships. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(3), 210213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gombolay, M. C., Wilcox, R. J., & Shah, J. A. (2018). Fast scheduling of robot teams performing tasks with temporospatial constraints. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 34(1), 220239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Amazeen, P. G. (2010). Training adaptive teams. Human Factors, 52(2), 295307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groom, V., & Nass, C. (2007). Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human–robot teams. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 483500.Google Scholar
Grossman, D. (2018). Amazon fired its resume-reading AI for sexism. Retrieved from Scholar
Gruenfeld, D. H., Martorana, P. V., & Fan, E. T. (2000). What do groups learn from their worldliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 4559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(5722), 697702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don’t work. In Tindale, R. S., Heath, L., & Edwards, J. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245267). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human–robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausknecht, J. P., & Holwerda, J. A. (2013). When does employee turnover matter? Dynamic member configurations, productive capacity, and collective performance. Organization Science, 24(1), 210225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, E. (2008, May 12). Google’s 20 percent factor. ABC News. Retrieved from Scholar
Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 226251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, M. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. III (2012). Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 232255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, A., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 5984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K. J., Ziegert, J. C., Knight, A. P., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 590621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333375). London, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, K. M. (2016). The rise of the “Gig Economy” and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 157162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanaj, K., Foulk, T. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2018). The benefits of not seeing eye to eye with leadership: Divergence in risk preferences impacts multiteam system behavior and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 15541582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanaj, K., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2015). Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: The role of gender and countervailing biases. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 14761494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanaj, K., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Barnes, C. M., & Harmon, S. J. (2013). The double-edged sword of decentralized planning in multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 735757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385399.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., ... & Murray, P. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 11791189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciano, M. M., DeChurch, L. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (2018). Multiteam systems: A structural framework and meso-theory of system functioning. Journal of Management, 44(3), 10651096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, B. (2018, August 29). The future of work: Are you ready for smart cobots? Forbes. Retrieved from Scholar
Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task–technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Organizational psychology, Vol. 2: Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 289313). London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., Carter, D. R., Asencio, R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2016). Space exploration illuminates the next frontier for teams research. Group & Organization Management, 41(5), 595628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, M., Woolley, A. W., & O’Leary, M. B. (2007). Conditions enabling effective multiple team membership. In Crowston, K., Sieber, S., & Wynn, E. (Eds.), Virtuality and virtualization (pp. 215228). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murase, T., Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2014). Mind the gap: The role of leadership in multiteam system collective cognition. Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 972986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, M. B., Mortensen, M., & Woolley, A. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461478.Google Scholar
Osborn, K. (2016, June 6). Real-time drone footage just gave the Apache a deadly advantage. Business Insider. Retrieved from Scholar
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pluut, H., Flestea, A. M., & Curşeu, P. L. (2014). Multiple team membership: A demand or resource for employees? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(4), 333348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2016). Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, March 7–10, 2016, Christchurch, New Zealand. Association for Computing Machinery/Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Retrieved from Scholar
Sauermann, H., & Franzoni, C. (2015). Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 679684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuffler, M. L., & Carter, D. R. (2018). Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities. American Psychologist, 73(4), 390406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, R., Page, K. R., & De Roure, D. (2014). Zooniverse: Observing the world’s largest citizen science platform. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’14 Companion) (pp. 10491054). New York, NY: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzmuller, M., & Park, G. (2018). Terrorist teams as loosely coupled systems. American Psychologist, 73(4), 491503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinke, J., Bolunmez, B., Fletcher, L., Wang, V., Tomassetti, A. J., Repchick, K. M., ... & Tetrick, L. E. (2015). Improving cybersecurity incident response team effectiveness using teams-based research. IEEE Security & Privacy, 13(4), 2029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, S. D., Lungeanu, A., DeChurch, L. A., & Contractor, N. S. (2015). Space, time, and the development of shared leadership networks in multiteam systems. Network Science, 3(1),124155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Cortez, R. (2017, October 7). Firefighters’ training kicked in, helping curb shooting death toll. Las Vegas Sun. Retrieved from Scholar
Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J., & Hicks, D. (2015). Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 197207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wax, A. (2015). Self-assembled teams: Attraction, composition, and performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. P., Mooney, S., Allen, D., Beller-Simms, N., Fish, T., Grambsch, A. E., ... & Langner, L. (2014). From global change science to action with social sciences. Nature Climate Change, 4(8), 656659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. A. (2012). Multiteam systems: An introduction In Multiteam systems (pp. 1847). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Dixon, R. A. (1984). New perspectives on the development of intelligence in adulthood: Toward a dual-process conception and a model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes, P. B. & Brim, O. G. Jr. (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior, Vol. 6 (pp. 3376). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Lifespan theory in developmental psychology. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569664). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beehr, T. A., & Bennett, M. M. (2015). Working after retirement: Features of bridge employment and research directions. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 112128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, M. E., Teachout, M. S., & Cox, C. B. (2012). The training and development of an aging workforce. In Hedge, J. W. & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 436453). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, M. E., Torres, W. J., & Gilberto, J. M. (2017). Continuous development throughout a career: A lifespan perspective on autonomous learning. In Ellingson, J. E. & Noe, R. A. (Eds.), Autonomous learning in the workplace (pp. 179200). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, E. C. (2013). The bright side of bad times: The affective advantages of entering the workforce in a recession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 587623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, E. C. (2014). Entering adulthood in a recession tempers later narcissism. Psychological Science, 25, 14291437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, S. A., Schröder, H. S., & Kunze, F. (2013). Comparative age management: Theoretical perspectives and practical implications. In Field, J., Burke, R., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of work, aging, and society (pp. 211237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandtstädter, J. (1999). The self in action and development: Cultural, biosocial, and ontogenetic bases of intentional self-development. In Brandtstädter, J. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Action and self development: Theory and research through the life span (pp. 3765). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Calo, J. (2005). The generativity track: A transitional approach to retirement. Public Personnel Management, 34, 301312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S. M., Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Fuzzy but useful constructs: Making sense of the differences between generations. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3, 130139.CrossRef