Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-hg4f7 Total loading time: 1.591 Render date: 2022-06-27T13:00:48.386Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Part I - Theoretical Foundations of Stakeholder Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2019

Jeffrey S. Harrison
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
Jay B. Barney
Affiliation:
University of Utah
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Robert A. Phillips
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asher, C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Toward a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9(1): 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 12311241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 33053325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. & Harrison, J. S. (2018). Stakeholder theory at the crossroads. Business & Society, forthcoming.CrossRef
Berman, S. L., & Johnson-Cramer, M. E. (2017). Stakeholder theory: Seeing the field through the forest. Business & Society.CrossRef
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488506.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Scott, Foreman.Google Scholar
Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 447456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 864888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4): 576609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridoux, F. & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridoux, F. & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, J., Vogel, R., & Zachary, M. (2018). Organization-stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 476501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2013). Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3): 352376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8): 895907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics. (1999). Principles of Stakeholder Management. Toronto: University of Toronto. Reproduced in 2002, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1): 256264.
Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science 10(2): 119133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, A., and Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devinney, T. M., McGahan, A. M., & Zollo, M. (2013). A research agenda for global stakeholder strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 3: 325337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., & House, R. J. (2008). Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinate perceptions of leadership and firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 626654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. E., & Berman, S. L. (2011). Bounding the world’s miseries: Corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In Phillips, R. A., ed., Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects, pp.153. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1994). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N. E., eds., Ethical Theory and Business, pp. 6667. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 233236.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2017). Five challenges to stakeholder theory: A report on research in progress. In Wasieleski, D. M. & Weber, J., eds., Stakeholder management, pp. 120. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Castro, R. and Aguilera, R. V. (2015). Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 137147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Castro, R., & Francoeur, C. (2016). When more is not better: Complementaries, costs and contingencies in stakeholder management. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 406424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, R. (2005). Four formal (izable) theories of the firm? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58(2): 200245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A. (1999). Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 228232.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 5874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 97124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & van der Laan Smith, J. (2015). Responsible accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 935960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatherly, D., Mitchell, R. K., Mitchell, J. R., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Reimagining profits and stakeholder capital to address tensions among stakeholders. Business & Society. Published online December 14, 2017.
Heminway, J. M. (2017). Shareholder wealth maximization as a function of statutes, decisional law, and organic documents. Washington & Lee Law Review, 74, 939.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35 (12): 17271748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 125139.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1907/1981). Pragmatism, Kuklick, B., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M., & Felps, W. (2013). Stakeholder happiness enhancement: A neo-utilitarian objective for the modern corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3): 349379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketokivi, M & Mahoney, J. T. (2016). Transaction Cost Economics As a Constructive Stakeholder Theory, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1): 123138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korschun, D. (2015). Boundary-spanning employees and relationships with external stakeholders: A social identity approach. Academy of Management Review, 40(4): 611629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 6: 105140.Google Scholar
Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6): 11521189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits?: The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, J. E. (2017). Corporate social performance: A review of empirical research examining the corporation-society relationship using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data. Business & Society, 56: 796839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review, 36: 485495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1957/1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3): 285298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Van BurenIII, H. J., Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 851877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., & Gras, D.. (2018). A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations, Academy of Management Review, 43(2): 259283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). Evolutionary theory of economic change. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, S., and Watson, R.. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 526536.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., and Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3): 403441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 129141.CrossRef
Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Phillips, R., Berman, S., Elms, H., & Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010). Strategy, stakeholders and managerial discretion. Strategic Organization, 8(2): 176–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R., Berman, S., Elms, H., & Johnson-Cramer, M. (2011). Stakeholder orientation, managerial discretion and Nexus rents. In Phillips, R., ed., Stakeholder Theory: Impact and Prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., and Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 479502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sauter-Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, L. E., and Sapienza, H. J. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4): 361375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priem, R. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32: 219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(4): 397418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5): 491508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisodia, R., Wolfe, D. B., & Sheth, J. (2007). Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1999). The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists – not convergent theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 222227.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 11241131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2): 426438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C., and Harrison, J. S. (2017). Toward a more productive dialogue between stakeholder theory and strategic management. In Wasieleski, D. M. & Weber, J., eds., Stakeholder management, pp. 249274. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., & Bercovitz, J. (1996). The modern corporation as an efficiency instrument: The comparative contracting perspective. In Kaysen, C., ed., The American Corporation Today, pp. 327359. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zenger, T. R., Felin, T., & Bigelow, L. (2011). Theories of the firm–market boundary. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 89133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2018). Dewey’s Moral Philosophy. In Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dewey-moral/.
Aristotle, . (1941). Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv Preprint cs/0309023. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0309023
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488506.Google Scholar
Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 447456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2013). Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3): 352376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4): 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences: Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, R. (2017). John Dewey. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Peer Reviewed). Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. de. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2006). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1): 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 315327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M., Millo, Y., & Barman, E. (2015). Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 907934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. (2002). Being and time. New York: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 131154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 125139.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1): 3963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummon, N. P., Dorian, P., & Freeman, L. C. (1990). Analyzing the structure of the centrality-productivity literature created between 1948 and 1979. Knowledge, 11(4): 459480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1891). The moral philosopher and the moral life. The International Journal of Ethics, 1(3): 330354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 323338.Google Scholar
King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business and Society, 47, 2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007). Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3): 413442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévinas, E., & Nemo, P. (1985). Ethics and infinity. Lancaster, UK: Gazelle Book Services.Google Scholar
Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3): 528542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Van Buren, H. J., Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 851877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2016). Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 252275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(0), 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., & Kelly, E. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11): 11571178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1992). The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B., & Aikin, S. F. (2008). Pragmatism: A guide for the perplexed. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4): 769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whetten, D. A. (2002). Modelling-as-theorizing: A systematic methodology for theory development. In Partington, D., ed., Essential skills for management research, 2nd ed., pp. 4571. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. (1997). The moral sense. New York: Free Press Paperback.Google Scholar
Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. M. (2002). Business citizenship: From individuals to organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 5994.Google Scholar
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4): 441464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. S. (2007). The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist critique of labour process theory. Organization Studies, 28(9): 13131345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aktouf, O. (1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? Academy of Management Review, 17(3): 407431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009). The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Méric, J. (2005). A critique of stake-holder theory: Management science or a sophisticated ideology of control? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(2): 2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvidsson, A. (2009). The ethical economy: Towards a post-capitalist theory of value. Capital & Class, 33(1): 1329. doi: 10.1177/030981680909700102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvidsson, A. (2010). Speaking out: The ethical economy: New forms of value in the information society? Organization, 17(5): 637644. doi: 10.1177/1350508410372512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management & Governance, 9(1): 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission. (1986). Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws at Common Law. www.alrc.gov.au/publications/report-31
Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine. Organization & Environment, 13(1): 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S. B., & Prasad, A. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on “Critical reflections on management and organizations: A postcolonial perspective.” Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3): 9098.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. (1985). The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. Praxis International, 5(4): 402424.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A., & Means, G. G. C. (1991). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Beck, C. (2016). Earth hour: Do we still need the lights-out protest? The Christian Science Monitor, March 19, A2.
Bevan, D., & Werhane, P. (2011). Stakeholder theory. In Painter-Morland, M. & ten Bos, R., eds., Business ethics and continental philosophy, pp. 3760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, L. & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism, trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boussebaa, M. (2015). Professional service firms, globalisation and the new imperialism. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(8): 12171233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, H. W. (2005). The business of empire: The East India Company and imperial Britain, 1756–1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organization science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16: 262290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bridgman, T. (2007). Reconstituting relevance: Exploring possibilities for management educators’ critical engagement with the public. Management Learning, 38(4): 425439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2005). Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(3): 137148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, J. W., & Bhave, D. (2008). Values, ideologies, and frames of reference in industrial relations. In Bacon, N., Heery, E., Fiorito, J., & Blyton, P., eds., The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations, pp. 92112. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2): 221235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1991). Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organization Studies, 12(4): 567601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Holvino, E. (2014). Theorizing gender-and-organization: changing times … changing theories? In The Oxford handbook of gender and organizations, pp. 5375. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York; Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. (2015). Foreword. In Prasad, A., Prasad, P., Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H., eds., The Routledge companion to critical management studies, pp. xiii-xiv. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1): 7787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beauvoir, S. (1988). The second sex. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Delphy, C. (1984). Close to home: A materialist analysis of women’s oppression. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. E., & Berman, S. L. (2011). Bounding the world’s miseries: Corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects, 138. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Erlichman, H. J. (2010). Conquest, tribute, and trade: The quest for precious metals and the birth of globalization. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B., & Burkett, P. (2001). Marx and the dialectic of organic/inorganic relations: A rejoinder to Salleh and Clark. Organization & Environment, 14(4): 451462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, M. (2008). The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 924942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (1992). Business, Ethics and Society: A Critical Agenda. Business & Society, 31(1): 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008) Diverse economies: Performative practices for “other worlds,” Progress in Human Geography 32(5): 613–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1): 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 315327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M., & Anderson, E. (2009). “I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder” Implications of labelling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pacific Human Resource Journal, 47(2): 186200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2011). Ethics and HRM: The contribution of stakeholder theory. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 30(3/4): 269292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2009). The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: The case of climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(6): 347371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of State-Run Enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247265. doi: 10.1023/B: BUSI.0000039418.75103.edCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingvaldsen, J. A. (2015). Organizational learning: Bringing the forces of production back in. Organization Studies, 36(4): 423443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, G., Westwood, R., Srinivas, N., & Sardar, Z. (2011). Deepening, broadening and re-asserting a postcolonial interrogative space in organization studies. Organization 18(3): 275302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. L. R. (1983). Beyond a boundary. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kazmi, B. A., Leca, B., & Naccache, P. (2016). Is corporate social responsibility a new spirit of capitalism? Organization, 23(5): 742762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, K. (2009). Heeding the stains: Lacan and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(2): 214228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koen, S. (1984). Feminist workplaces: Alternative models for the organization of work. PhD dissertation, Union for Experimenting Colleges, University of Michigan Dissertation Information Service.
Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
McVea, J. F., & Freeman, R. E. (2005). A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: How focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1): 5769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Kling, G. (2014). Pathways to power: Class, hyper-agency and the French corporate elite. Organization Studies, 35(6): 825855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marens, R. (2016). Giving the devils their due: What Marxian historiography can contribute to management history. In Academy of Management Proceedings (vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 10142). Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Marquetti, A. A. (2003). Analyzing historical and regional patterns of technical change from a classical-Marxian perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2): 191200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, S. (2011). A critical analysis of North American business leaders’ neocolonial discourse: Global fears and local consequences, Organization, 18(3): 387399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, A., Carter, C., Pezet, E., & Clegg, S. (2010). Using Foucault to make strategy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(8): 10121031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennicken, A., & Miller, P. (2014). Michel Foucault and the administering of lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mir, R., Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1999). Global technoscapes and silent voices: Challenges to theorizing global cooperation. In Cooperrider, D. & Dutton, J., eds., Organizational Dimensions of Global Change, pp. 270290. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mir, R. Marens, R., & Mir, A. (2008). The corporation and its fragments: Corporate citizenship and the legacies of imperialism. In Scherer, A. & Palazzo, G., eds., The handbook of corporate citizenship, pp. 819852. London: Edward Elgar Press.Google Scholar
Mir, R & Mir, A. (2012). Organizational change as imperialism. In Boje, D., Burnes, B., & Hassard, J., eds., Routledge companion to organizational change, pp. 425439. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mir, R., Mir, A., & Wong, D. (2006). Diversity: The cultural logic of global capital? In Konrad, A., Prasad, P., & Pringle, J., eds., Handbook of workplace diversity, pp.167188. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, (30): 6188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriceau, J.-L. (2005). Faceless figures: Is a socially responsible decision possible? In Bonnafous-Boucher, M. & Pesqueux, Y., eds., Stakeholder theory: A European perspective, (pp. 89103). Basingstoke, UK: PalgraveCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, J. (2014). The connection between stakeholder theory and stakeholder democracy. Business & Society, 53(6): 820852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto‐communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2): 171182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. (2003). Once more, with feeling: Feminist economics and the ontological question. Feminist Economics, 9 (1): 109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nord, W. (1977). A Marxist critique of humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 17 (1): 7583.Google Scholar
Parsons, R. (2008). We are all stakeholders now. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2): 99126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, C. (1972). Complex organizations: A critical essay. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 479502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A. (1997a). The colonizing consciousness and representation of the Other: A postcolonial critique of the discourse of oil. In Prasad, P., Mills, A., Elmes, M., & Prasad, A., eds., Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity, pp. 285311. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A. (1997b). Provincializing Europe: Towards a post-colonial reconstruction: A critique of Baconian science as the last strand of imperialism. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 3: 91117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A., Prasad, P., Mills, A. J., & Mills, J. H. (2015). The Routledge companion to critical management studies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prashad, V. (2008). The darker nations: A people’s history of the Third World. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R (1994). Postmodernism and the rest of the world. Organization, 1(2): 305340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R. (1996). The changing subject and the politics of theory. In Diasporic mediations: Between home and location, (pp. 6892). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roloff, J. (2008). A life cycle model of multi‐stakeholder networks. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(3): 311325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sanders, R. L. (1997). If Marx had been a business process reengineer … Information Management, 31(2): 5872.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 10961120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slinger, G. (1999). Spanning the gap: The theoretical principles that connect stakeholder policies to business performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7: 136151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. & Willmott., H. (1991). The new middle class and the labour process. In Smith, C. R. & Willmott, H., eds., White-collar work: The non-manual labour process, pp. 1334. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, A., & Banerjee, S. (2016). Governance: Changing conceptions of the corporation. In Mir, R., Willmott, H., & Greenwood, M., eds., The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, (pp. 403411). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the interpretation of culture, pp. 271313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(1): 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1995). Sugar island slavery in the age of Enlightenment: The political economy of the Caribbean world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, K. (1974). The origins of job structures in the steel industry. Review of Radical Political Economics, 6(2): 113–73.Google Scholar
Stoney, C., & Winstanley, D. (2001). Stakeholding: Confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain. The Journal of Management Studies, 38(5): 603626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadajewski, M., Maclaran, P., & Parsons, E. (Eds.). (2011). Key concepts in critical management studies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatli, A. (2012). On the power and poverty of critical (self) reflection in critical management studies: A comment on Ford, Harding and Learmonth. British Journal of Management, 23(1): 2230.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Buren III, H. (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3): 481499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buren III, H. (2016). Capital as a neglected, yet essential, topic for organization studies. In Mir, R., Willmott, H., & Greenwood, M., eds., The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, (pp. 293300). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Buren III, H. & Greenwood, M. (2009). Stakeholder voice: A problem, a solution, and a challenge for managers and academics. Philosophy of Management, 8(3): 1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzner, D. (2007). Deconstruction revisited: Implications of theory over methodology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(1): 4354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, J., Daniel, R., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W. F., & Whyte, K. K. (1991). Making Mondragon: The growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1999). A vindication of the rights of woman. Boston: Thomas and Andrews Press.Google Scholar
Yuthas, K., & Dillard, J. F. (1999). Ethical development of advanced technology: A postmodern stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1), 3549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: UK evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5): 641654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, E., Jensen, M., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 153190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 507525.Google Scholar
Ahlstedt, L., & Jahnukainen, I. (1971). Yritysorganisaatio Yhteistoiminnan Ohjausjaerjestelmaenae. Helsinki: Weilin + Goeoes.Google Scholar
Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment, New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1996). Increasing returns and the two worlds of business. Harvard Business Review, 74(4): 100109Google Scholar
Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14(5): 510527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717736.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1): 7695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (2016). Why strategic management scholars must adopt a stakeholder perspective. Unpublished manuscript presented at the 2016 International Association for Business and Society Annual Meeting, Park City, UT, June 17, 2016. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Indian School of Business, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the 2016 BYU-University of Utah Winter Strategy Conference, the University of Tennessee, the University of Southern California, The University of California at Irvine, Baruch College, The Strategic Management Society’s 2015 “Stakeholder Theory at a Crossroads” conference held at Zion’s National Park, and at the 2015 Academy of Management Meetings.
Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory must adopt a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming. Retrieved from https://sites.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/file.cfm?fid=59440.
Barraquier, A. (2013). A group identity analysis of organizations and their stakeholders: Porosity of identity and mobility of attributes. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1): 4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. A., & Boal, K. (1994). Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 131148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. (1988). The moral obligations of multinational corporations. In Luper-Foy, S., ed., Problems of International Justice, pp. 97113. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. I. (2003a). The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3): 213226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. I. (2003b). The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in the UK between 1989 and 1999: Industry structure and stakeholder influences. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(3): 216228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, S. N. (1993). The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In Pasquero, J. & Collins, D., eds., Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, pp. 205210. San Diego: International Association for Business and Society.Google Scholar
Brenner, S. N. (1995). Stakeholder theory of the firm: Its consistency with current management techniques. In Näsi, J., ed., Understanding stakeholder thinking, pp. 1931. Helsinki: LSR-Jukaisut Oy.Google Scholar
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calton, J. M., & Lad, L. J. (1995). Social contracting as a trust-building process of network governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(2): 271295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5): 539553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B (1989). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1993). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 2nd edn. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2015). Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management, 9th edn. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Carter, S. M. (2006). The interaction of top management group, stakeholder, and situational factors on certain corporate reputation management activities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 11451176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1): 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3): 319335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. (1988). Chief executive scamming, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 7076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1999). The environmental reporting expectations gap: Australian evidence, British Accounting Review, 31(3): 313346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, K., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1): 5573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, L. D., Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhanced stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1): 2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8): 765781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N., eds., Ethical Theory and Business, pp. 7584. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimensions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model redefined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1): 113135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 11801198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 409421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19: 337359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (1987). Managing stakeholder relationship. In Sethi, S. P. & Falbe, C. M., eds., Business and society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation, pp. 397423. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Reputation, survival and success, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3): 9394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3): 364369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business & Society, 44(1): 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1994). Reviewing the strategy-structure-performance paradigm. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16: 215255.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6): 781795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 5874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2014). Stakeholder theory, value and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 97124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1): 7999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heugens, P., van den Bosch, F., & van Riel, C. (2002). Stakeholder integration: Building mutually enforcing relationships. Business & Society, 41(1): 3660Google Scholar
Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. K. (2005). Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1): 6791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, B. W. (1998). Organizational justice and the management of stakeholder relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6): 643651.Google Scholar
Ibarra, H., & Barbulescu, R. (2010). Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 35(1): 135154.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 564576.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1):91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochan, T. A., & Rubinstein, S. A. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11(4): 367386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 704730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langtry, B. (1994). Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 431443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2016). Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy, 15th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Nord, W. R., eds., Handbook of organization studies, 2nd edn., pp. 215254. London, UK: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H. (2015). Stakeholder work and value creation stakeholder engagement: An integrative framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.
Lee, J. H., & Mitchell, R. K. (2013). Stakeholder work and stakeholder research. Presented at the 2013 International Association for Business Society Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon.CrossRef
Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 155187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27: 455469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marens, R., & Wicks, A. (1999). Getting real: Stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2): 273293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, A., Mitchell, R. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). The vulnerability and strength duality in ethnic business: A model of stakeholder salience and social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2): 271289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matty, D. (2011). Enterprise architecture shapes stakeholder salience influence on enterprise value-creation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6): 11751195.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3): 233249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structures in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3): 322341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K. (2002). Entrepreneurship and stakeholder theory. The Ruffin Series of the Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 175196.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K. (2003). Assessing stakeholder interests in prosperity and cultural well-being – Appendix A. In Nyce, C., ed., Masters in Our Own House: The Path to Prosperity and Cultural Well-being, pp. 163182. Terrace, BC: Skeena Native Development Society.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2): 235255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Lee, J. H., & Agle, B. R. (2017). Stakeholder prioritization work: The role of stakeholder salience in stakeholder research. In Weber, J. & Wasieleski, D., eds., Business and Society 360 Book Series on Stakeholder Management, vol. 1, pp. 123157. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Robinson, R. E., Marin, A., Lee, J. H., & Randolph, A. F. (2013). Spiritual identity, stakeholder attributes, and family business workplace spirituality stakeholder salience. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10(3): 215252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Van Buren, H. J. III, Greenwood, M., Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7): 851877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2016). Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 252275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In Näsi, J., ed., Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, pp. 1932. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.Google Scholar
Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1): 108131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajunen, K. (2006). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6): 12611288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3): 223230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. A. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5): 19331949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhenman, E. (1964). Foeretagsdemokrati och Foeretagsorganisation, Stockholm: Thule.Google Scholar
Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. (1987). Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. In Teece, D., ed., The competitive challenge, pp. 137158. Boston: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. H., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2): 6175.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4): 899931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. S. (2006). God as a managerial stakeholder? Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2–3): 291306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 159180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory, 2nd edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2): 175187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6): 13361371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford memo. (1963). Stanford Research Institute (SRI) internal memorandum as refd in Freeman and Reed (1983) and Freeman (1984, pp. 31–33).
Starik, M. (1994). Essay by Mark Starik. pp. 89–95 of the Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 33(1): 82131.Google Scholar
Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 314329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. K., Wartick, S. L., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: Implications for a research agenda in small business. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12(1): 207230.Google Scholar
Ulmer, R. R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2000). Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2): 143155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, S. (2002). Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process. The Ruffin Series of the Society of Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 4558.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weitzner, D., & Deutsch, Y. (2015). Understanding motivation and social influence in stakeholder prioritization. Organization Studies, 36(10): 13371360.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R. Jr., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literature. Business and Society, 33(3): 293311.Google Scholar
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar