Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-mdtzd Total loading time: 1.159 Render date: 2021-10-16T19:35:52.401Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

12 - Object Pragmatics: Culture and Communication – the Bases for Early Cognitive Development

from Part III - The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

Alberto Rosa
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Jaan Valsiner
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., & Deckner, D. F. (2004). The development of symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development, 75(4), 11711187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alessandroni, N. (2016). Development of metaphorical thought before language: The pragmatic construction of metaphors in action. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-016-9373-3.Google Scholar
Amorim, K. S, dos Anjos, A. M., & Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C. (2012). Processos interativos de bebês em creche. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(2), 378389.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. & Swettenham, J. (1996). The relationship between SAM and ToMM. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. (Eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind (pp. 158168). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthélémy-Musso, A., Tartas, V., & Guidetti, M. (2013). Prendre les objets et leurs usages au sérieux: Aproche développementale de la co-construction de conventions sémiotiques entre enfants. Psychologie Française, 58, 6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basilio, M. & Rodríguez, C. (2011). Usos, gestos y vocalizaciones privadas: De la interacción social a la autorregulación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34, 181194. DOI: 10.1174/021037011795377593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basilio, M. & Rodríguez, C. (2016). How toddlers think with their hands: social and private gestures as evidence of cognitive self-regulation in guided play with objects. Early Child Development and Care, 116. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1202944.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205226.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. & Most, R. K. (1981). From exploration to play: A cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 630639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, J. & Di Giovanni, N. (1970/1972). Doctor Brodie's Report (trans. di Giovanni, N.). London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Brizuela, B. & Cayton-Hodges, G. (2013). Young children's self-constructed maps. In Brizuela, B. & Gravel, B. (Eds.), “Show Me What You Know”: Exploring Student Representations across STEM Disciplines (pp. 2242). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bronckart, J. P. (2002). La explicación en psicología ante el desafío del significado. Estudios de Psicología, 23(3), 387416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J. P. (2012). Contributions of Piagetian constructivism to social interactionism. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 4358). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1975). From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3(1), 255287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, G. (2003). Pointing is the royal road to language for babies. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing. Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet (pp. 933). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, K. (2012). Primeros usos simbólicos de niños con síndrome de Down en contextos de interacción triádica: Un estudio longitudinal entre los 12 y 21 meses de edad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cárdenas, K., Rodríguez, C., Miranda-Zapata, E., & Palacios, P. (forthcoming). Usos simbólicos de los objetos de niño/as con síndrome de Down de 12 a 21 meses: Un estudio longitudinal en interacción niño/a-adulto-objeto.
Cárdenas, K., Rodríguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2014). First symbols in a girl with Down syndrome: A longitudinal study from 12 to 18 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 37, 416427. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. & Carpendale, A. B. (2010). The development of pointing: From personal directedness to interpersonal direction. Human Development, 53, 110126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 79151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalcante, S. (2016). Desarrollo del número de dos a cuatro años: De los usos de objetos en interacción con un adulto a los usos numéricos. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cavalcante, S. & Rodríguez, C. (2015). The understanding of die as an object that has numerical functions: A longitudinal study using two children from the ages of 24 to 36 months interacting with an adult / La comprensión del dado como objeto con funciones numéricas: Un estudio longitudinal con dos niños desde los 24 a los 36 meses en interacción con un adulto. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 4870. DOI: 10.1080/02109395.2014.1000028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet (pp. 243268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. AVANT, 3(2), 8593.Google Scholar
Delgado, B., Gómez, J. C., & Sarriá, E. (2009). Private pointing and private speech: Developing parallelisms. In Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C. & Montero, I. (Eds.), Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delgado, B., Gómez, J. C., & Sarriá, E. (2011). Pointing gestures as a cognitive tool in young children: Experimental evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 299312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Olmo, M. J., Rodríguez, C., & Ruza, F. (2010). Music therapy in the PICU: 0 to 6 month-old babies. Music and Medicine, 2(3) 158166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, N. & Moro, C. (2013). Common ground on object use associates with caregivers’ gestures. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 618626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duque, M. P. & Packer, M. J. (2014). Pensamiento y lenguaje: El proyecto de Vygotski para resolver la crisis de la Psicología. Tesis Psicológica, 9(2), 3057.Google Scholar
El'konin, D. B. (1966). Symbolics and its functions in the play of children. Soviet Education, 8(3), 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Español, S. (2004). Cómo hacer cosas sin palabras: Gesto y ficción en la infancia temprana. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar
Español, S. (2006). Possible precursors of private speech: Deictic, symbolic and aesthetic self-directed gestures. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current Research Trends in Private Speech: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 120124). Madrid: Ediciones UAM.Google Scholar
Foster, R. & Kreitzman, L. (2004). Rhythms of Life: The Biological Clocks that Control the Daily Lives of Every Living Thing. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Fuson, K. (1988). Children's Counting and Concept of Nnumber. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, R. & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The Child's Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1979/2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (classical edn. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Göncü, A. & Gaskins, S. (2011). Comparing and extending Piaget's and Vygotsky's understanding of play: Symbolic play as individual, sociocultural, and educational interpretation. In Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Play (pp. 4857). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1990). Through a Window: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Graham, T. (1999). The role of gesture in children's learning to count. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 333355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groupe µ (1992). Traité du signe visuel: Pour une rhétorique de l'image. Paris: Seuil.
Ishiguro, H. (2016). How a young child learns how to take part in mealtimes in a Japanese day-care center: A longitudinal case study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(1), 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Badillo, B., & Aguilar, N. (2010). Verbal and non-verbal requests in Spanish-speaking children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 12(2), 98102.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2012). From constructivism to neuroconstructivism: The activity-dependent structuring of the human brain. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 114). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Kaye, K. (1982/1986). La vida mental y social del bebé. Cómo los padres crean personas. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Kontopodis, M. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2016). Educational settings as interwoven socio-material orderings: An introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 112. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-015-0269-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94(4), 412426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. (2012). Peer relations. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.). Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 122). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0045.Google Scholar
Lillard, A., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children's development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 134. DOI: 10.1037/A0029321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Reference and attitude in infant pointing. Journal Child Language, 34, 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luria, A. (1979). The Making of Mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology (ed. by Cole, M. & Cole, S.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Martí, E. (2003). Representar el mundo externamente: La adquisición infantil de los sistemas externos de representación. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar
Martí, E. (2012). Thinking with signs: From symbolic actions to external systems of representation. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 151170). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Martí, E., Scheuer, N., & de la Cruz, M. (2013). Symbolic use of quantitative representations in young children. In Brizuela, B. & Gravel, B. (Eds.), “Show Me What You Know”: Exploring Student Representations across STEM Disciplines (pp. 721). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
McCune, L. (1995). A normative study of representational play at the transition to language. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 198206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2015). The rhythmic, sonorous and melodic components of adult–child–object interactions between 2 and 6 months old. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 737756. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-015-9298-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2017). Rhythmic ostensive gestures: How adults facilitate infants’ entrance into early triadic interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 49, 168181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C. & Miranda-Zapata, E. (forthcoming). Getting away from the point: The emergence and functions of ostensive gestures. Gesture.
Moro, C. (2012). Heuristique des thèses sémiotiques vygotskiennes pour l'approche du développement des fonctions exécutives chez le jeune enfant. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, Vygotskij and language/Vygotskij e illinguaggio, 6(2) 210224.Google Scholar
Moro, C. (2016). To encounter, to build the world and to become a human being: Advocating for a material-cultural turn in developmental psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 586602. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-016-9356-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moro, C., Dupertuis, V., Fardel, S., & Piguet, O. (2015). Investigating the development of consciousness through ostensions toward oneself from the onset of the use-of-object to first words. Cognitive Development, 36, 150160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro, C. & Muller Mirza, N. (Eds.). (2012). Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique. Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Moro, C. & Rodríguez, C. (2005). L'objet et la construction de son usage chez le bébé: Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Müller, U. & Kerns, K. (2015). The development of executive function. In Lerner, R., Liben, L. S., & Müller, U. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science. Volume 2: Cognitive Processes (pp. 10581160). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2015). Making sense with private speech. Cognitive Development, 36, 171179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios, P. & Rodríguez, C. (2015). The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: A pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant and Child Development, 24, 2343. DOI: 10.1002/icd.1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios, P., Rodríguez, C., Méndez-Sánchez, C., Hermosillo, A. E., Sahagún, M. A., & Cárdenas, K. (2016). The development of the first symbolic uses in Mexican children from the pragmatics of object/ Desarrollo de los primeros usos simbólicos en niños mexicanos desde la Pragmática del Objeto. Estudios de Psicología, 37, 5989. DOI: 10.1080/02109395.2015.1122437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papoušek, H. (1996). Musicality in infancy research: Biological and cultural origins of early musicality. In Deliegé, I. & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.), Musical Beginnings: Origins and Development of Musical Competence (pp. 3755). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perinat, A. (1993). Comunicación animal, comunicación humana. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1936/1977). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1945/1976). La formation du symbole chez l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2008). How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2012). Moving others matters. In Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U. M., Racine, T. P., & Zlatev, J. (Eds.), Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language (pp. 139163). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivière, A. (1985). La psicología de Vygotski. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar
Rivière, A. (1990). Origen y desarrollo de la función simbólica en el niño. In Palacios, J., Marchesi, A., & Coll, C. (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación, I Psicología Evolutiva (pp. 113130). Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2012). Baby assault on Piaget. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 7182). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo: Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia. Barcelona: Horsori.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2007). Object use, communication and signs: The triadic basis of early cognitive development. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Socio-Cultural Psychology (pp. 257276). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2009). The “circumstances” of gestures: Proto-interrogatives and private gestures. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 288303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (123150). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2015). The connection between language and the world: A paradox of the linguistic turn? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49, 89103. DOI 10.1007/s12124-014-9274-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez, C., Benassi, J., Estrada, L., & Alessandroni, N. (2017). Early social interactions with people and objects. In Slater, A. & Bremner, G. (Eds.), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology (3rd edn., pp. 211257). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C., Estrada, L., Moreno-Llanos, I., & de los Reyes, J. L. (2017). Executive functions and educational actions in an infant school: Private uses and gestures at the end of the first year / Funciones Ejecutivas y acción educativa en la Escuela Infantil: Usos y gestos privados al final del primer año. Estudios de Psicología (special issue on Executive Functions / Funciones ejecutivas), 38(2), 385423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C., Moreno-Núñez, A., Basilio, M., & Sosa, N. (2015). Ostensive gestures come first: Their role in the beginning of shared reference. Cognitive Development, 36, 142149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Moro, C. (1999). El mágico número tres: Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Moro, C. (2008). Coming to agreement: Object use by infants and adults. In Zlatev, J., Racine, T., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 89114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Palacios, P. (2007). Do private gestures have a self-regulatory function? A case study. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(2), 180194. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez, C., Palacios, P., Cárdenas, K., & Yuste, N. (2014). Les symboles: Des formes de second ou de troisième sens? In Moro, C. & Mirza, N. Muller (Eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement Psychologique (pp. 99116). Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Scheuer, N. (2015). The paradox between the numerically competent baby and the slow learning of two- to four-year-old children / La paradoja entre el bebé numéricamente competente y el lento aprendizaje de los niños de dos a cuatro años de edad. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, A. (chapter 6 this volume).
Rosa, A. & Valsiner, J. (chapter 1 this volume).
Saada-Robert, M. (2012). From individual to didactic microgenesis: Studies on situated knowledge transformations. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 187205). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B., Eggleston, V. H., & Scott, J. L. (1974). Number development in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 357379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, C. (2014). Signification et matérialité: Le langage au fondement des artefacts symboliques. In Moro, C. & Mirza, N. Muller (Eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique (pp. 117138). Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Sonesson, G. & Lenninger, S. (2015). The psychological development of semiotic competence: From the window to the movie by way of the mirror. Cognitive Development, 36, 191201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S. (2000, November). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 12331243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tartas, V. (2008). La construction du temps social par l'enfant. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tartas, V., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Baucal, A. (2016). Experimental micro-histories, private speech and a study of children's learning and cognitive development. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39(4), 772811. DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2016.1221055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M., & Spyer, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trehub, S. (2003). The developmental origins of musicality. Nature Neuroscience, 7(6), 669673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (2003). Conversations with a two-month-old. Philadelphia, PA: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
Vallotton, C. (2008). Infants take self-regulation into their own hands. Zero to Three, September, 2934.
Valsiner, J. (2016, July). The human psyche on the border of irreversible time: Forward-oriented semiosis. Invited address at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.
Vergnaud, G. (2013). Pourquoi la théorie des champs conceptuels? Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36(2), 131161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotski, L. S. (1931/1995a). El problema del desarrollo de las funciones psíquicas superiores. In Vygotski, L. S., Obras escogidas (vol. III, pp. 1146). Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Vygotski, L. S. (1931/1995b). La prehistoria del desarrollo del lenguaje escrito. In Vygotski, L.S., Obras Escogidas (vol. III, pp. 183206).Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Vygotski, L. S. (1934/1985). Pensée et langage. Paris: Terrains/Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Wallon, H. (1942/1970). De l'acte à la pensée. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes. Human Development, 51(1), 6679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A. (2009). Still talking to ourselves after all these years: A review of current research on private speech. In Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C., & Montero, I. (Eds.), Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-regulation (pp. 341). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuste, N. (2012). Desarrollo simbólico e interacción entre iguales en la escuela infantil. Unpublished DEA dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Yuste, N., Rodríguez, C., & de los Reyes, J. L. (forthcoming). Interacción entre iguales y el estatus de los objetos en la producción de usos simbólicos.
Zelazo, P. D. & Müller, U. (2004). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 445469).Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T. (2010). How does an object become symbolic? Rooting semiotic artifacts in dynamic shared experiences. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.), Symbolic Transformation: The Mind in Movement through Culture and Society (pp. 173192). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zulauf, M. (2002). Limites et promesses de quelques théories du développement musical. In Wirthner, M. & Zulauf, M. (Eds.), À la recherche du développement musical (pp. 1951). Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
9
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×