Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-zlj4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T09:25:55.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

Alberto Rosa
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Jaan Valsiner
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Arango, A. M. (2014). Velo que bonito: Prácticas y saberes sonoro-corporales de la primera infancia en la población afrochocoana [Look how nice: Sound–body practices and knowledge of early infancy in Afro-Chocoana population]. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Cultura.Google Scholar
Bainbridge Cohen, B. (2012). Sensing, Feeling, and Action: The Experiential Anatomy of Body–Mind Centering. Northampton, MA: Contact Editions.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1972). Nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27(8), 687708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Di Cesare, G., Di Dio, C., Rochat, M. J., Sinigaglia, C., Brushweiler-Stern, N., Stern, D. N., & Rizzolatti, G. (2013). The neural correlates of “vitality form” recognition: An fMRI study. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 51(10), 19181924.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 3387). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Español, S. (2010). Los primeros pasos hacia los conceptos de yo y del otro: La experiencia solitaria y el contacto “entre nosotros” durante el primer semestre de vida [The first steps towards the concepts of self and other: Lonely experience and “between us” contact during the first half of life]. In Pérez, D., Español, S., Skidelsky, L., & Minervino, R. (Eds.), Conceptos: Debates contemporáneos en filosofía y psicología (pp. 308334). Buenos Aires: Catálogos.Google Scholar
Español, S. (2012). El desarrollo semiótico [Semiotic development]. In Carretero, M. & Castorina, J. A. (Eds.), Desarrollo Cognitivo y Educación: Los inicios del conocimiento (vol. I, pp. 219240). Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Español, S. (2014). La forma repetición variación: Una estrategia para la reciprocidad [The repetition-variation form: A strategy for reciprocity]. In Español, S. (Ed.), Psicología de la música y del desarrollo: Una exploración interdisciplinaria sobre la musicalidad humana (pp. 157192). Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Español, S., Bordoni, M., Martínez, M., Camarasa, R., & Carretero, S. (2015). Forms of vitality play and symbolic play during the third year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 242251.Google Scholar
Español, S., Martínez, M., Bordoni, M., Camarasa, R., & Carretero, S. (2014). Forms of vitality play in infancy. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(4), 479502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Español, S. & Shifres, F. (2015). The artistic infant directed performance: A mycroanalysis of the adult's movements and sounds. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 371397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagen, R. M. (2011). Play and development. In Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Play (pp. 83100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldenkrais, M. (1972). Awareness Through Movement. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Feldenkrais, M. & Beringer, E. (2010). Embodied Wisdom: The Collected Papers of Moshé Feldenkrais. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1992). Movement and communication in human infancy. Human Movement Science, 11(4), 387423.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (2013). Body Sense: The Science and Practice of Embodied Self-Awareness (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gratier, M. & Trevarthen, C. (2008). Musical narrative and motives for culture in mother–infant vocal interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(10), 122158.Google Scholar
Hackney, P. (2002). Making Connections: Total Body Integration Through Bartenieff Fundamentals. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanna, T. (1986). What is somatics? Somatics: Magazine-Journal of the Bodily Arts and Sciences, 5(4). Retrieved from http://somatics.org/library/htl-wis1.Google Scholar
Hanna, T. (1988). Somatics: Reawakening the Mind's Control of Movement, Flexibility, and Health. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Mamana, S. (2016). Educación somática: Más allá de la propia piel [Somatic education: Beyond one's skin]. Kiné, 120, 21.Google Scholar
Needham, A. & Libertus, K. (2011). Embodiment in early development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(1), 117123.Google Scholar
Ospina, V. & Español, S. (2014). El movimiento y el sí mismo [Movement and self]. In Español, S. (Ed.), Psicología de la música y del desarrollo: Una exploración interdisciplinaria sobre la musicalidad humana (pp. 111155). Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Nomikou, I., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2013). Young children's dialogical actions: The beginnings of purposeful intersubjectivity. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5, 210221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, V. (2008). How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmalzl, L., Crane-Godreau, M. A., & Payne, P. (2014). Movement-based embodied contemplative practices: Definitions and paradigms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, art. 205.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Spitz, R. A. (1963). La première année de la vie de l'enfant [The first year of the child's life]. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (2010). Forms of Vitality: Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology, the Arts, Psychotherapy and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. (1979). Rhythmical stereotypes in normal humans infant. Animal Behavior, 27, 699715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. (2000a). Grounded in the world: Developmental origins of the embodied mind. Infancy, 1 (1), 328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thelen, E. (2000b). Motor development as foundation and future of developmental psychology. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 385397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15 (2), 225283.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., & Spencer, J. P. (1996). The development of reaching during the first year: The role of movement speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 10591076.Google ScholarPubMed
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

References

Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., & Deckner, D. F. (2004). The development of symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development, 75(4), 11711187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alessandroni, N. (2016). Development of metaphorical thought before language: The pragmatic construction of metaphors in action. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-016-9373-3.Google Scholar
Amorim, K. S, dos Anjos, A. M., & Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C. (2012). Processos interativos de bebês em creche. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(2), 378389.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. & Swettenham, J. (1996). The relationship between SAM and ToMM. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. (Eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind (pp. 158168). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barthélémy-Musso, A., Tartas, V., & Guidetti, M. (2013). Prendre les objets et leurs usages au sérieux: Aproche développementale de la co-construction de conventions sémiotiques entre enfants. Psychologie Française, 58, 6788.Google Scholar
Basilio, M. & Rodríguez, C. (2011). Usos, gestos y vocalizaciones privadas: De la interacción social a la autorregulación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34, 181194. DOI: 10.1174/021037011795377593.Google Scholar
Basilio, M. & Rodríguez, C. (2016). How toddlers think with their hands: social and private gestures as evidence of cognitive self-regulation in guided play with objects. Early Child Development and Care, 116. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1202944.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205226.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. & Most, R. K. (1981). From exploration to play: A cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 630639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, J. & Di Giovanni, N. (1970/1972). Doctor Brodie's Report (trans. di Giovanni, N.). London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Brizuela, B. & Cayton-Hodges, G. (2013). Young children's self-constructed maps. In Brizuela, B. & Gravel, B. (Eds.), “Show Me What You Know”: Exploring Student Representations across STEM Disciplines (pp. 2242). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bronckart, J. P. (2002). La explicación en psicología ante el desafío del significado. Estudios de Psicología, 23(3), 387416.Google Scholar
Bronckart, J. P. (2012). Contributions of Piagetian constructivism to social interactionism. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 4358). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1975). From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3(1), 255287.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. (2003). Pointing is the royal road to language for babies. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing. Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet (pp. 933). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, K. (2012). Primeros usos simbólicos de niños con síndrome de Down en contextos de interacción triádica: Un estudio longitudinal entre los 12 y 21 meses de edad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, K., Rodríguez, C., Miranda-Zapata, E., & Palacios, P. (forthcoming). Usos simbólicos de los objetos de niño/as con síndrome de Down de 12 a 21 meses: Un estudio longitudinal en interacción niño/a-adulto-objeto.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, K., Rodríguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2014). First symbols in a girl with Down syndrome: A longitudinal study from 12 to 18 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 37, 416427. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.06.003.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. & Carpendale, A. B. (2010). The development of pointing: From personal directedness to interpersonal direction. Human Development, 53, 110126.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 79151.Google Scholar
Cavalcante, S. (2016). Desarrollo del número de dos a cuatro años: De los usos de objetos en interacción con un adulto a los usos numéricos. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Cavalcante, S. & Rodríguez, C. (2015). The understanding of die as an object that has numerical functions: A longitudinal study using two children from the ages of 24 to 36 months interacting with an adult / La comprensión del dado como objeto con funciones numéricas: Un estudio longitudinal con dos niños desde los 24 a los 36 meses en interacción con un adulto. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 4870. DOI: 10.1080/02109395.2014.1000028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet (pp. 243268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. AVANT, 3(2), 8593.Google Scholar
Delgado, B., Gómez, J. C., & Sarriá, E. (2009). Private pointing and private speech: Developing parallelisms. In Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C. & Montero, I. (Eds.), Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delgado, B., Gómez, J. C., & Sarriá, E. (2011). Pointing gestures as a cognitive tool in young children: Experimental evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 299312.Google Scholar
Del Olmo, M. J., Rodríguez, C., & Ruza, F. (2010). Music therapy in the PICU: 0 to 6 month-old babies. Music and Medicine, 2(3) 158166.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, N. & Moro, C. (2013). Common ground on object use associates with caregivers’ gestures. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 618626.Google Scholar
Duque, M. P. & Packer, M. J. (2014). Pensamiento y lenguaje: El proyecto de Vygotski para resolver la crisis de la Psicología. Tesis Psicológica, 9(2), 3057.Google Scholar
El'konin, D. B. (1966). Symbolics and its functions in the play of children. Soviet Education, 8(3), 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Español, S. (2004). Cómo hacer cosas sin palabras: Gesto y ficción en la infancia temprana. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar
Español, S. (2006). Possible precursors of private speech: Deictic, symbolic and aesthetic self-directed gestures. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current Research Trends in Private Speech: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 120124). Madrid: Ediciones UAM.Google Scholar
Foster, R. & Kreitzman, L. (2004). Rhythms of Life: The Biological Clocks that Control the Daily Lives of Every Living Thing. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Fuson, K. (1988). Children's Counting and Concept of Nnumber. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gelman, R. & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The Child's Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1979/2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (classical edn. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Göncü, A. & Gaskins, S. (2011). Comparing and extending Piaget's and Vygotsky's understanding of play: Symbolic play as individual, sociocultural, and educational interpretation. In Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Play (pp. 4857). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1990). Through a Window: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Graham, T. (1999). The role of gesture in children's learning to count. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 333355.Google Scholar
Groupe µ (1992). Traité du signe visuel: Pour une rhétorique de l'image. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, H. (2016). How a young child learns how to take part in mealtimes in a Japanese day-care center: A longitudinal case study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(1), 1327.Google Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Badillo, B., & Aguilar, N. (2010). Verbal and non-verbal requests in Spanish-speaking children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 12(2), 98102.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2012). From constructivism to neuroconstructivism: The activity-dependent structuring of the human brain. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 114). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Kaye, K. (1982/1986). La vida mental y social del bebé. Cómo los padres crean personas. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Kontopodis, M. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2016). Educational settings as interwoven socio-material orderings: An introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 112. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-015-0269-2.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94(4), 412426.Google Scholar
Li, X. (2012). Peer relations. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.). Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 122). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0045.Google Scholar
Lillard, A., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children's development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 134. DOI: 10.1037/A0029321.Google Scholar
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Reference and attitude in infant pointing. Journal Child Language, 34, 120.Google Scholar
Luria, A. (1979). The Making of Mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology (ed. by Cole, M. & Cole, S.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Martí, E. (2003). Representar el mundo externamente: La adquisición infantil de los sistemas externos de representación. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar
Martí, E. (2012). Thinking with signs: From symbolic actions to external systems of representation. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 151170). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Martí, E., Scheuer, N., & de la Cruz, M. (2013). Symbolic use of quantitative representations in young children. In Brizuela, B. & Gravel, B. (Eds.), “Show Me What You Know”: Exploring Student Representations across STEM Disciplines (pp. 721). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
McCune, L. (1995). A normative study of representational play at the transition to language. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 198206.Google Scholar
Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2015). The rhythmic, sonorous and melodic components of adult–child–object interactions between 2 and 6 months old. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 737756. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-015-9298-2.Google Scholar
Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2017). Rhythmic ostensive gestures: How adults facilitate infants’ entrance into early triadic interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 49, 168181.Google Scholar
Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C. & Miranda-Zapata, E. (forthcoming). Getting away from the point: The emergence and functions of ostensive gestures. Gesture.Google Scholar
Moro, C. (2012). Heuristique des thèses sémiotiques vygotskiennes pour l'approche du développement des fonctions exécutives chez le jeune enfant. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, Vygotskij and language/Vygotskij e illinguaggio, 6(2) 210224.Google Scholar
Moro, C. (2016). To encounter, to build the world and to become a human being: Advocating for a material-cultural turn in developmental psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 586602. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-016-9356-4.Google Scholar
Moro, C., Dupertuis, V., Fardel, S., & Piguet, O. (2015). Investigating the development of consciousness through ostensions toward oneself from the onset of the use-of-object to first words. Cognitive Development, 36, 150160.Google Scholar
Moro, C. & Muller Mirza, N. (Eds.). (2012). Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique. Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Moro, C. & Rodríguez, C. (2005). L'objet et la construction de son usage chez le bébé: Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Müller, U. & Kerns, K. (2015). The development of executive function. In Lerner, R., Liben, L. S., & Müller, U. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science. Volume 2: Cognitive Processes (pp. 10581160). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2015). Making sense with private speech. Cognitive Development, 36, 171179.Google Scholar
Palacios, P. & Rodríguez, C. (2015). The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: A pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant and Child Development, 24, 2343. DOI: 10.1002/icd.1873.Google Scholar
Palacios, P., Rodríguez, C., Méndez-Sánchez, C., Hermosillo, A. E., Sahagún, M. A., & Cárdenas, K. (2016). The development of the first symbolic uses in Mexican children from the pragmatics of object/ Desarrollo de los primeros usos simbólicos en niños mexicanos desde la Pragmática del Objeto. Estudios de Psicología, 37, 5989. DOI: 10.1080/02109395.2015.1122437.Google Scholar
Papoušek, H. (1996). Musicality in infancy research: Biological and cultural origins of early musicality. In Deliegé, I. & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.), Musical Beginnings: Origins and Development of Musical Competence (pp. 3755). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perinat, A. (1993). Comunicación animal, comunicación humana. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1936/1977). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1945/1976). La formation du symbole chez l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2008). How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2012). Moving others matters. In Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U. M., Racine, T. P., & Zlatev, J. (Eds.), Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language (pp. 139163). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rivière, A. (1985). La psicología de Vygotski. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar
Rivière, A. (1990). Origen y desarrollo de la función simbólica en el niño. In Palacios, J., Marchesi, A., & Coll, C. (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación, I Psicología Evolutiva (pp. 113130). Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2012). Baby assault on Piaget. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 7182). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo: Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia. Barcelona: Horsori.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2007). Object use, communication and signs: The triadic basis of early cognitive development. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Socio-Cultural Psychology (pp. 257276). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2009). The “circumstances” of gestures: Proto-interrogatives and private gestures. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 288303.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (123150). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. (2015). The connection between language and the world: A paradox of the linguistic turn? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49, 89103. DOI 10.1007/s12124-014-9274-2.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C., Benassi, J., Estrada, L., & Alessandroni, N. (2017). Early social interactions with people and objects. In Slater, A. & Bremner, G. (Eds.), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology (3rd edn., pp. 211257). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C., Estrada, L., Moreno-Llanos, I., & de los Reyes, J. L. (2017). Executive functions and educational actions in an infant school: Private uses and gestures at the end of the first year / Funciones Ejecutivas y acción educativa en la Escuela Infantil: Usos y gestos privados al final del primer año. Estudios de Psicología (special issue on Executive Functions / Funciones ejecutivas), 38(2), 385423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C., Moreno-Núñez, A., Basilio, M., & Sosa, N. (2015). Ostensive gestures come first: Their role in the beginning of shared reference. Cognitive Development, 36, 142149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Moro, C. (1999). El mágico número tres: Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Moro, C. (2008). Coming to agreement: Object use by infants and adults. In Zlatev, J., Racine, T., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 89114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Palacios, P. (2007). Do private gestures have a self-regulatory function? A case study. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(2), 180194. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.010.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C., Palacios, P., Cárdenas, K., & Yuste, N. (2014). Les symboles: Des formes de second ou de troisième sens? In Moro, C. & Mirza, N. Muller (Eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement Psychologique (pp. 99116). Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. & Scheuer, N. (2015). The paradox between the numerically competent baby and the slow learning of two- to four-year-old children / La paradoja entre el bebé numéricamente competente y el lento aprendizaje de los niños de dos a cuatro años de edad. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 1847.Google Scholar
Rosa, A. (chapter 6 this volume).Google Scholar
Rosa, A. & Valsiner, J. (chapter 1 this volume).Google Scholar
Saada-Robert, M. (2012). From individual to didactic microgenesis: Studies on situated knowledge transformations. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 187205). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B., Eggleston, V. H., & Scott, J. L. (1974). Number development in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 357379.Google Scholar
Sinha, C. (2014). Signification et matérialité: Le langage au fondement des artefacts symboliques. In Moro, C. & Mirza, N. Muller (Eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique (pp. 117138). Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Sonesson, G. & Lenninger, S. (2015). The psychological development of semiotic competence: From the window to the movie by way of the mirror. Cognitive Development, 36, 191201.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S. (2000, November). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 12331243.Google Scholar
Tartas, V. (2008). La construction du temps social par l'enfant. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tartas, V., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Baucal, A. (2016). Experimental micro-histories, private speech and a study of children's learning and cognitive development. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39(4), 772811. DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2016.1221055.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M., & Spyer, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trehub, S. (2003). The developmental origins of musicality. Nature Neuroscience, 7(6), 669673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (2003). Conversations with a two-month-old. Philadelphia, PA: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
Vallotton, C. (2008). Infants take self-regulation into their own hands. Zero to Three, September, 2934.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2016, July). The human psyche on the border of irreversible time: Forward-oriented semiosis. Invited address at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, G. (2013). Pourquoi la théorie des champs conceptuels? Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36(2), 131161.Google Scholar
Vygotski, L. S. (1931/1995a). El problema del desarrollo de las funciones psíquicas superiores. In Vygotski, L. S., Obras escogidas (vol. III, pp. 1146). Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Vygotski, L. S. (1931/1995b). La prehistoria del desarrollo del lenguaje escrito. In Vygotski, L.S., Obras Escogidas (vol. III, pp. 183206).Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Vygotski, L. S. (1934/1985). Pensée et langage. Paris: Terrains/Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Wallon, H. (1942/1970). De l'acte à la pensée. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes. Human Development, 51(1), 6679.Google Scholar
Winsler, A. (2009). Still talking to ourselves after all these years: A review of current research on private speech. In Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C., & Montero, I. (Eds.), Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-regulation (pp. 341). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89100.Google Scholar
Yuste, N. (2012). Desarrollo simbólico e interacción entre iguales en la escuela infantil. Unpublished DEA dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Yuste, N., Rodríguez, C., & de los Reyes, J. L. (forthcoming). Interacción entre iguales y el estatus de los objetos en la producción de usos simbólicos.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D. & Müller, U. (2004). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 445469).Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T. (2010). How does an object become symbolic? Rooting semiotic artifacts in dynamic shared experiences. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.), Symbolic Transformation: The Mind in Movement through Culture and Society (pp. 173192). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zulauf, M. (2002). Limites et promesses de quelques théories du développement musical. In Wirthner, M. & Zulauf, M. (Eds.), À la recherche du développement musical (pp. 1951). Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar

References

Bain, R. (1936). The self-and-other words of a child. The American Journal of Sociology, 41(6), 767775.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1923/1990). Author and hero in aesthetic activity (trans. by V. Liapunov). In Holquist, M. & Liapunov, V. (Eds.), Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin (vol. 9, pp. 4256). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1906). Mental Development in the Child and the Race. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163186.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. (1908). A study of the early use of the self words by a child. Psychological Review, 15, 339357.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3(July), 357370.Google Scholar
Doise, W. & Mugny, G. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellect. Oxford: Pergammon.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L. C., & Gregory, J. (1997). Coordination, cooperation and communication in the courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. In Cole, M., Engestrom, Y., & Vasquez, O. (Eds.), Mind, Culture and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 369385). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farr, R. M. (1997). The significance of the skin as a natural boundary in the sub-division of psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 305323.Google Scholar
Gergely, G. & Watson, J. S. (1996). The social biofeedback theory of parental affect-mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in infancy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 11811212.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2003). Surplus & supplementarity: Moving between the dimensions of otherness. Culture & Psychology, 9, 209220.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2005). G. H. Mead: Theorist of the social act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35, 1939.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2006a). Becoming Other to Oneself: A Meadian Study of Culture Tourism in Ladakh. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2006b). Tourist photography and the reverse gaze. Ethos, 34, 343366.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2007). Collapsing self/other positions: Identification through differentiation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 579595.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. (2010). The intersubjective nature of symbols. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.), Symbolic Transformations: The Mind in Movement through Culture and Society (pp. 2337). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2013). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 7379.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2013). Meaning making in motion: Bodies and minds moving through institutional and semiotic structures. Culture & Psychology, 19, 518532.Google Scholar
Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4).Google Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243281.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. (2002). The Cradle of Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ichheiser, G. (1949). Misunderstandings in human relations: A study in false social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 55, 172.Google Scholar
Josephs, I. E. (2002). “The Hopi in me”: The construction of a voice in the dialogical self from a cultural psychological perspective. Theory & Psychology, 12, 161173.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (1995). Social representations in and of the public sphere: Towards a theoretical articulation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25, 81102.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1949/1977). The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic theory. In Écrits: A Selection (pp. 19). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. A. & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36, 150167.Google Scholar
Lundgren, D. C. (2004). Social feedback and self-appraisals: Current status of the Mead-Cooley hypothesis. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 267286.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (1982). Paradigms, Thought and Language. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. (1998). When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development. Human Development, 41, 326354.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1910). Social consciousness and the consciousness of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 401408.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1912). The mechanism of social consciousness. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 9, 401406.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1922). A behavioristic account of the significant symbol. Journal of Philosophy, 19, 157163.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In Farr, R. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.), Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2000). Narrative, time and the emergence of the encultured self. Culture & Psychology, 6, 183196.Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. (1951). Psychopathology and Psychiatry: Selected Works (trans. by D. Myshne & S. Belsky). Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1878/1998). Charles S. Peirce: The Essential Writings (ed. by Moore, Edward C.). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology (3rd edn., pp. 703732). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Prebensen, N. K., Larsen, S., & Abelsen, B. (2003). I'm not a typical tourist: German tourists’ self-perception, activities and motivations. Journal of Travel Research, 41, 416420.Google Scholar
Psaltis, C. & Duveen, G. (2006). Social relations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation type and representations of gender. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 407430.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1974). On Message Structure: A Framework for the Study of Language and Communication. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Shrauger, J. S. & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549573.Google Scholar
Sigel, I. E. (2002). The psychological distancing model: A study of the socialization of cognition. Culture & Psychology, 8, 189214.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1759/1982). The Theory of Moral Sentiments (ed. by Raphael, D. D. & Macfie, A. L.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Tolman, C. W. & Piekkola, B. (1989). John Dewey and dialectical materialism: Anticipations of activity theory in the critique of the reflex arc concept. Activity Theory, 1, 4346.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valsiner, J. (1998). The Guided Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 8497.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1925/1999). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior. In Veresov, N. N. (Ed.), Undiscovered Vygotsky: Etudes on the Pre-History of Cultural-Historical Psychology. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27, 5377.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (vol. 4, ed. by R. W. Rieber, trans. by M. J. Hall). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. & Luria, A. (1930/1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In Van de Veer, R. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Vygotsky Reader (pp. 99174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Themel, M., & Verma, J. (1999). The modernization of tradition: Thinking about madness in Patna, India. Culture & Psychology, 5, 413445.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. & Stone, A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives (pp. 162179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. (2005). The imitative correspondence problem: Solved or sidestepped? In Hurley, S. & Chater, N. (Eds.), Perspectives on Imitation: Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals (vol. 1, pp. 220222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9, 415448.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social Interaction and Cognitive Development in Children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

References

Bauer, P. J. (2007). Remembering the Times of Our Lives: Memory in Infancy and Beyond. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bogdan, R. J. (2010). Our Own Minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2001). A Mind so Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2012). Evolutionary origins of autobiographical memory: A retrieval hypothesis. In Bentsen, D. & Ruben, D. C. (Eds.), Understanding Autobiographical Memory: Themes and Approaches (pp. 269288). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fivush, R. (2014). Maternal reminiscing style: The sociocultural construction of autobiographical memory across childhood and adolescence. In Bauer, P. J. & Fivush, R. (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook on the Development of Children's Memory (vol. 2, pp. 568585). New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fivush, R. & Nelson, K. (2006). Parent–child reminiscing locates the self in the past. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 235251.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1905/1953). Childhood and concealing memories. In Brill, A. A. (Ed., trans.), The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud (pp. 3037). New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (1999). The Construction of the Self. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. A. (1991). Learning to reminisce: A case study. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 295324.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. (2010). Folk Psychological Narratives: The Socio-cultural Basis of Understanding Reasons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1991). Beyond modularity: Innate constraints and developmental change. In Carey, S. & Gelman, R. (Eds.), The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition (pp. 171197). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leichtman, M. D., Wang, Q., & Pillemer, D. B. (2003). Cultural variations in interdependence and autobiographical memory: Lessons from Korea, China, India, and the United States. In Fivush, R. & Haden, C. A. (Eds.), Autobiographical Memory and the Construction of a Narrative Self: Developmental and Cultural Perspectives (pp. 7398). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1979). Social Cognition and the Acquisition of Self. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (2006). Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moore, C. & Lemon, K. (2001). The Self in Time: Developmental Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1982). Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 3559.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1986). Event Knowledge: Structure and Function in Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1989). Narratives from the Crib. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1993). The psychological and social origins of autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 4, 18.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1996). Language in Cognitive Development: The Emergence of the Mediated Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2001). Language and the self: From the “Experiencing I” to the “Continuing Me.” In Moore, C. & Lemmon, K. (Eds.), The Self in Time: Developmental Perspectives (pp. 1534) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2003a). Narrative and self, myth and memory: Emergence of the cultural self. In Fivush, R. & Haden, C. A. (Eds.), Autobiographical Memory and the Construction of a Narrative Self: Developmental and Cultural Perspectives (pp. 328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2003b). Self and social functions: Individual autobiographical memory and collective narrative. Memory (special issue on Functions of Autobiographical Memory), 11, 125136.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. (Eds.), Why Language Matters to Theory of Mind (pp. 2649). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2007). Young Minds in Social Worlds: Experience, Meaning, and Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2008). Self in time: Emergence within a community of minds. In Sani, F. (Ed.), Self Continuity: Individual and Collective Perspectives (pp. 1326) New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2014). Sociocultural theories of memory development. In Bauer, P. J. & Fivush, R. (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook on the Development of Children's Memory. New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2017). The cultural basis of language and thought in development. In Budwig, N., Turiel, E., & Zelazo, P. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Human Development (pp. 402424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (forthcoming). The cultural construction of memory in early childhood. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.), Handbook Of Culture And Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. & Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review, 111, 486511.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. & Rideout, R. (1998). Memory for medical experiences by 1- and 2-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 34, 10591072.Google Scholar
Reese, E., Haden, C. A. & Fivush, R. (1993). Mother–child conversations about the past: Relationships of style and memory over time. Cognitive Development, 8, 403430.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. C. (1982). On the retention function for autobiographical memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 2138.Google Scholar
Rubin, E. C., Rahhal, T. A. & Poon, L. W. (1998). Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best. Memory and Cognition, 26, 319.Google Scholar
Sani, F. (2008). Self Continuity: Individual and Collective Perspectives. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of Episodic Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 6770.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2005). Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human? In Terrace, H. S. & Metcalfe, J. (Eds.), The Missing Link in Cognition: Origins of Self-reflective Consciousness (pp. 354). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language (trans. by E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2014). The cultured self and remembering. In Bauer, P. J. & Fivush, R. (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook on The Development of Children's Memory (pp. 605625). New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
White, R. (2002). Memory for events after twenty years. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 603612.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Bruner, J. (1997). A narrative model of self construction. In Snodgrass, J. G. &. Thompson, R. L. (Eds.), The Self Across Psychology (pp. 145162). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Fivush, R. & Nelson, K. (2006). Parent–child reminiscing locates the self in the past. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 235251.Google Scholar
Linton, M. (1975). Memory for real-world events. In Norman, D. A. & Rumelhart, D. E. (Eds.), Exploration in Cognition (pp. 3764). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

References

Adler, M. J. (1982). The Paideia Proposal: An Educational Manifesto. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Adler, M. J. (1983). Paideia Problems and Possibilities. New York: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Apatow, R. (1998). The Spiritual Art of Dialogue: Mastering Communication for Personal Growth, Relationships, and the Workplace. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (2000). Nicomachean Ethics (trans. by R. Crisp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and His World (trans. by H. Iswolsky). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1991). Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin (trans. by C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a Philosophy of the Act (1st edn.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (vol. 8). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Berlyand, I. E. (2009a). A few words about Bibler's dialogics: The school of the dialogue of cultures conception and curriculum. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 2033. DOI: 10.2753/RPO1061-0405470101.Google Scholar
Berlyand, I. E. (2009b). Puzzles of the number: Dialogue in the early grades of the school of the dialogue of cultures. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 6195. DOI: 10.2753/RPO1061-0405470103.Google Scholar
Bibler, V. S. (2009). The foundations of the school of the dialogue of cultures program. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 3460. DOI: 10.2753/RPO1061-0405470102.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice. (pp. 229270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Delpit, L. D. (1995). Other People's Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1956). The Child and the Curriculum and the School and Society (combined edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
D'Souza, D. (1995). The End of Racism: Principles for a Multiracial Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Facundo, B. (1984). Freire-inspired programs in the United States and Puerto Rico: A critical evaluation. Retrieved from www.bmartin.cc/dissent/documents/Facundo/Facundo.html.Google Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (1996). The dialogic mind: A dialogic approach to the higher mental functions. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(1), 4762.Google Scholar
Ferrer Guardia, F. (1913). The Origin and Ideals of the Modern School. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Filliou, R. & Cage, J. (1970). Lehren und Lernen als Auffuehrungskuenste: Teaching and Learning as Performing Arts. New York: Koenig.Google Scholar
Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1978). Pedagogy in Process: The Letters to Guinea-Bissau. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1986). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Freire, P. & Macedo, D. P. (1987). Literacy: Reading the Word & the World. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.Google Scholar
Garvey, A. & Fogel, A. (2007). Dialogical change processes, emotions, and the early emergence of self. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 2(1), 5176.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. (1989). Critique of Economic Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. (1992). The Sudbury Valley School Experience. Framingham, MA: Sudbury Valley School Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (vol. 3, pp. 4158). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. & Baillie, J. B. (1967). The Phenomenology of Mind. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hezser, C. (1997). The Social Structure of the Rabbinic Movement in Roman Palestine. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Klein, M. J. (1985). Paul Ehrenfest (3rd edn). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C. (2003). The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurganov, S. Y. (2009). Reading and literature in the primary and middle schools of the dialogue of cultures. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(2), 3058.Google Scholar
Labaree, D. F. (1997). How to Succeed in School without Really Learning: The Credentials Race in American Education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (2nd edn.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1981). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery (Repr. with corrections). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lefstein, A. & Snell, J. (2013). Better than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogic Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lensmire, T. J. (1994). Writing workshop as carnival: Reflections on an alternative learning environment. Harvard Educational Review, 64(4), 371391.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lobok, A. (2001). The Probabilistic World: The Chronicles of the Philosophical-Pedagogical Reflections of an Educational Experiment. Yekaterinburg, Russia: Association of Small Businesses.Google Scholar
Lobok, A. (2008). The Diamond-Filled Land of Olonkho Pedagogy. Yekaterinburg, Russia: Self-press.Google Scholar
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Markoff, J. (2015). Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground between Humans and Robots. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370396. DOI: 10.1037/h0054346.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. (2009a). Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. (2009b). The school of the dialogue of cultures pedagogical movement in Ukraine and Russia. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 319.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. (2015a). Chronotopes in education: Conventional and dialogic. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 3, A65A97. DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2015.107.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. (2015b). Four ages of our relationship with the reality: An educationalist perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(1), 6183. Doi: 10.1080/00131857.2013.860369.Google Scholar
Matusov, E., Baker, D., Fan, Y., Choi, H. J., & Hampel, R. (2017). Magic learning pill: Ontological and instrumental learning in order to speed up education. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(3), 456476.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2011). The state's educational neutrality and educational pluralism: A revolution proposal. Retrieved from https://diaped.soe.udel.edu/SEN/.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2012). Diverse approaches to education: Alienated learning, closed and open participatory socialization, and critical dialogue. Human Development, 55(3), 159166. DOI: 10.1159/000339594.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2015). Rehabilitation of power in democratic dialogic education. In Jezierska, K. & Koczanowicz, L. (Eds.), Democracy in Dialogue, Dialogue in Democracy (pp. 193209). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016). The state's educational neutrality: Radical proposal for educational pluralism (editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4, E1E26. DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2016.170.Google Scholar
Matusov, E. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2017). Many faces of the concept of culture (and education). Culture & Psychology, 23(3), 309336.Google Scholar
Matusov, E., & von Duyke, K. (2010). Bakhtin's notion of the internally persuasive discourse in education: Internal to what? (A case of discussion of issues of foul language in teacher education). In Junefelt, K. & Nordin, P. (Eds.), Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin, Stockholm University, Sweden June 3–5, 2009 (pp. 174199). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Han, S. (2012). Community of learners: Ontological and non-ontological projects. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 14(1), 4172.Google Scholar
McLaren, P. & Lankshear, C. (1994). Politics of Liberation: Paths from Freire. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. (2013). Build a school in the cloud. Retrieved from www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_build_a_school_in_the_cloud.Google Scholar
Morson, G. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In Ball, A. F. & Freedman, S. W. (Eds.), Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Learning (pp. 317331). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morson, G. S. & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing. New York: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
O'Connor, C. & Michaels, S. (2007). When is dialogue “dialogic”? Human Development, 50(5), 275285.Google Scholar
Packer, M. J. & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 227241.Google Scholar
Paley, V. G. (1992). You Can't Say You Can't Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. (2002). Socrates Café: A Fresh Taste of Philosophy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Plato, (1984). Great dialogues of Plato (trans. by W. H. D. Rouse). New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Plato, (1997). Complete Works (trans. by J. M. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plato, & Bluck, R. S. (1961). Meno. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation (trans. by K. Ross). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Renshaw, P. D. (2013). Classroom chronotopes privileged by contemporary educational policy: teaching and learning in testing times. In Phillipson, S., Ku, K. Y. L. & Phillipson, S. N. (Eds.), Constructing Educational Achievement: A Sociocultural Perspective (pp. 5769). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The Handbook of Education and Human Development: New Models of Learning, Teaching and Schooling (pp. 388414). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rule, P. N. (2015). Dialogue and Boundary Learning: Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2005). The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture, and Identity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Shor, I. (1987). Freire for the Classroom: A Sourcebook for Liberatory Teaching (1st. edn.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
Shor, I. & Freire, P. (1987). What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 1131.Google Scholar
Sidorkin, A. M. (1999). Beyond Discourse: Education, the Self, and Dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sloan, S. (1998). The Slave Children of Thomas Jefferson. Santa Monica, CA: Kiseido Publications.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P., Smith, M. P., & Matusov, E. (2009). Bakhtin, Socrates and the carnivalesque in education. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(3), 326342. DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.12.001.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, L. (1967). Tolstoy on Education (trans. by L. Wiener). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, Educational and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar

References

Abbey, E. (2012). Ambivalence and its transformation. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 989997). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1895). The origin of a “thing” and its nature. Psychological Review, 2, 551573.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1906). Thought and Things: A Study of the Development and Meaning of Thought, or Genetic Logic. Volume 1: Functional Logic, or Genetic Theory of Knowledge. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1908). Thought and Things: A Study of the Development and Meaning of Thought, or Genetic Logic. Volume 2: Experimental Logic, or Genetic Theory of Thought. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1911). Thought and Things: A Study of the Development and Meaning of Thought, or Genetic Logic. Volume 3: Interest and Art Being Real Logic. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1915). Genetic Theory of Reality. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Beloussov, L. V. (1998). The Dynamic Architecture of a Developing Organism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluver Academic.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157173.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity (rev. edn.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Boesch, E. (1991). Symbolic Action Theory and Cultural Psychology. Berlin:Springer.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1981). Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics, 10, 633649.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. (2010). The mutual shaping of human action and institutional settings: A study of the transformation of children's services and professional work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4), 377393.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. (2015). Boundaries within and between contexts. In Marsico, G., Dazzani, V., Ristum, M., & Bastos, A. C. (Eds.), Educational Contexts and Borders through A Cultural Lens – Looking Inside. Viewing Outside (Cultural Psychology of Education, vol. 1, pp. 1127). Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar
Euclid, . (1970). Gli elementi (trans. by A. Frajese and L. Maccioni). Turin, Italy: UTET.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge (trans. by Smith, A. M. Sheridan). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Innis, R. E. (2016). Between philosophy and cultural psychology: Pragmatist and semiotic reflections on the thresholds of sense. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 331361.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2011). The “non-cuttable” space in between: Context, boundaries and their natural fluidity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 185193.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2013). Moving between the social spaces: Conditions for boundaries crossing. In Marsico, G., Komatsu, K., and Iannaccone, A. (Eds.), Crossing Boundaries: Intercontextual Dynamics between Family and School. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2015a). Developing with time: Defining a temporal mereotopology. In Simão, L. M., Guimarães, D. S., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Temporality: Culture in the Flow of Human Experience (pp. 118), Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2015b). Cultivating possibilities for cultural psychology: Jerome Bruner in his becoming. In Marsico, G. (Ed.), Jerome S. Bruner Beyond 100: Cultivating Possibilities (Cultural Psychology of Education, vol. 2, pp. 241245). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2016). The borderland. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 206215. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X15601199.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Cabell, K. R., Valsiner, J., & Kharlamov, N. A. (2013). Interobjectivity as a border: The fluid dynamics of “betweenness.” In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 5165). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Dazzani, V., Ristum, M., & Bastos, A. C. (Eds.). (2015). Educational Contexts and Borders Through a Cultural Lens: Looking Inside, Viewing Outside (Cultural Psychology of Education, vol. 1). Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. & Iannaccone, A. (2012). The work of schooling. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 830868). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Komatsu, K., & Iannaccone, A. (Eds.). (2013). Crossing Boundaries: Intercontextual Dynamics Between Family and School. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. & Valsiner, J. (2016). Making history: Apprehending future while reconstructing the past. In Säljö, R., Linell, P., & Mäkitalo, Å. (Eds.), Memory Practices and Learning: Experiential, Institutional, and Sociocultural Perspectives (pp. 355372), Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. & Varzi, A. (2016). Psychological and social borders: Regulating relationships. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as a Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 327335), Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1902/1910). Ueber Annahmen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (suppl.).Google Scholar
Ogawa, R. T., Crain, R., Loomis, M., & Ball, T. (2008). CHAT-IT: Toward conceptualizing learning in the context of formal organizations. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 8395.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1901/1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, T. & Valsiner, J. (2010). Time in life and life in time: Between experiencing and accounting. Ritsumeikan Journal of Human Sciences, 20(1), 7992.Google Scholar
Sevastianov, S. V., Laine, J. P., Kireev, A. A., Golunov, S. V., Meževič, N. M., et al. (Eds.). (2015). Introduction to Border Studies. Vladivostok, Russia: Dalnauka.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1918/2010). The View of Life: Four Metaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms (trans. by Andrews, J.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1994). Bridge and door. Theory Culture Society, 11(5), 510.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1997). Boundaries: An essay in mereotopology. In Hahn, L. H. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (pp. 534561). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Smith, B. & Varzi, A. (2000). Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60, 401420.Google Scholar
Tateo, L. (2015). What imagination can teach us about higher mental functions. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., and Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being (pp. 149164). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tateo, L. & Marsico, G. (2015). Navigating the unknown river of development. In Cresswell, J., Haye, A., Larrìn, A., Morgan, M., & Sullivan, G., Dialogue and Debate in the Making of Theoretical Psychology (pp. 3039). Ontario, Canada: Captus University Publications.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the Development of Children's Action (2nd edn.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1999). I create you to control me: A glimpse into basic processes of semiotic mediation. Human Development, 42, 2630.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and Human Development. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2014a). An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2014b). Functional reality of the quasi real: Gegenstandstheorie and cultural psychology today. Culture & Psychology, 20(3), 285307.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. & Van der Veer, R. (2014). Encountering the border: Vygotsky's zona blizhaishego razvitia and its implications for theory of development. In Yasnitsky, A., van der Veer, R. & Ferrari, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cultural-Historical Psychology (pp. 148173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (1997). Boundaries, continuity, and contact. Noûs, 31, 2658.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (1998). Basic problems of mereotopology. In Guarino, N. (Ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems (pp. 2938). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (2011). Boundaries, conventions, and realism. In Campbell, J. K., O'Rourke, M., & Slater, M. H. (Eds.), Carving Nature at Its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (2013). Boundary. In Zalta, E. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/boundary/.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (2016). Ai Limiti del Possibile. In Taddio, L. (Ed.), In dialogo con Maurizio Ferraris (pp. 91107). Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Augé, M. (1992). Non-lieux: introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité (vol. 20). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Smith, B. & Brogaard, B. (2000). Quantum mereotopology. AAAI Technical Report WS-00–08, 2531.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2011). Constructing the vanishing present between the future and the past. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34(2), 141150.Google Scholar