Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:20:59.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - What Is Routine Dynamics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2021

Martha S. Feldman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Brian T. Pentland
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Luciana D'Adderio
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Katharina Dittrich
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Claus Rerup
Affiliation:
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management
David Seidl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Get access

Summary

This chapter offers an introduction to Routine Dynamics as a particular approach to studying organizational phenomena. We provide a brief description of the genealogy of research on routines; starting with the work of the management scholar Fredrick Taylor (1911) and the pragmatist philosopher John Dewey (1922) at the beginning of the last century, to the works of the Carnegie School on standard operating procedures around the middle of the last century, to the economics-based Capabilities approach and finally the practice-based approach of Routine Dynamics around the turn of the century. We also discuss the advantages of conceptualizing patterns of action as “routines”, as compared to “practices”, “processes”, “activities” or “institutions”. In particular, we highlight that the concept of routines directs the researcher’s attention to certain specificities of particular action patterns, such as task orientation, sequentiality of actions, recurrence and familiarity as well as attempts at reflexive regulation. We also introduce and explain the key concepts of the Routine Dynamics perspective and how they have developed over time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aroles, J. and McLean, C. (2016). Rethinking stability and change in the study of organizational routines: Difference and repetition in a newspaper-printing factory. Organization Science, 27(3), 535550.Google Scholar
Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238256.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1950). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnholtz, J. P., Cohen, M. D. and Hoch, S. V. (2007). Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organization Science, 18(2), 315332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanche, C. and Cohendet, P. (2019). Remounting a ballet in a different context: A complementary understanding of routines transfer theories. In Feldman, M., D’Adderio, L., Jarzabkowski, P. and Dittrich, K., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 1130.Google Scholar
Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2019). Transferring routines across multiple boundaries: A flexible approach. In Feldman, M., D’Adderio, L., Jarzabkowski, P., and Dittrich, K., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 3153.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 594613.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In Callon, M., ed., The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 244269.Google Scholar
Callon, M. and Caliskan, C. (2010). Economization, Part 2: A research programme on the Study Of Marketization. Economy and Society, 39(1), 132.Google Scholar
Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442455.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), 773786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohendet, P. S. and Simon, L. O. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organization Science, 27(3), 614632.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. (2008). The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37(5), 769789.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197230.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. (2014). The replication dilemma unraveled: How organizations balance multiple goals in routines transfer. Organization Science, 25(5), 13251350.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. and Pollock, N. (2020). Making routines the same: Crafting similarity and singularity in routines transfer. Research Policy, 49(8), 104029.Google Scholar
Danner-Schröder, A. and Geiger, D. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27(3), 633658.Google Scholar
Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H. and Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27(3), 659677.Google Scholar
den Nieuwenboer, N. A., Cunha, J. V. d. and Treviño, L. K. (2017). Middle managers and corruptive routine translation: The social production of deceptive performance. Organization Science, 28(5), 781803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: H. Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Dittrich, K., Guérard, S. and Seidl, D. (2016). Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organization Science, 27(3), 678697.Google Scholar
Dittrich, K. and Seidl, D. (2018). Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 111138.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Faillo, M. and Marengo, L. (2008). Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: An introduction. Organization Studies, 29(8–9), 11651185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., eds. (2000). Nature & Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eberhard, J., Frost, A. and Rerup, C. (2019). The dark side of routine dynamics: Deceit and the work of Romeo Pimps. In Feldman, M., D’Adderio, L., Jarzabkowski, P. and Dittrich, K., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 99121.Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1978). What Is Sociology? Translated by Stephen Mennell and Grace Morrissey. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281317.Google Scholar
Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202225.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611629.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2015). Theory of Routine Dynamics and connections to strategy as practice. In Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 320333.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In Howard-Grenville, J. A., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: A Process Perspective. Perspectives on Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2346.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 12401253.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94118.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505513.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Worline, M. (2016). The practicality of practice theory. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(2), 304324.Google Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2009). Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2), 157167.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A. and Ocasio, W. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 140.Google Scholar
George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A. and Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 18801895.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, 1st ed. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, V. L. (2017). Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 21262154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, J. M., Gao, G. and Agarwal, R. (2011). Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Information Systems Research, 22(3), 565585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, K. T. and Pentland, B. T. (2019). From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 19011929.Google Scholar
Hernes, T. (2008). Theory for a Tangled World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618636.Google Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J. and Rerup, C. (2017). A process perspective on organizational routines. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Sage Handbook of Process Organizational Studies. London: Sage Publications, pp. 323339.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kiwan, L. and Lazaric, N. (2019). Learning a new ecology of space and looking for new routines: Experimenting robotics in a surgical team. In Feldman, M., D’Adderio, L., Jarzabkowski, P. and Dittrich, K., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 173192.Google Scholar
Kremser, W. and Schreyögg, G. (2016). The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organization Science, 27(3), 698721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H, eds. (2017). Perspectives on Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 113.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In Law, J., ed., Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 261277.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W. and Law, J., eds., Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225258.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L. and Ilan, R. (2016). Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: An ethnomethodological study of handoff routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 514534.Google Scholar
Leidner, R. (1993). Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. (2011). A behavioral approach to strategy: What’s the alternative? Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 15171523.Google Scholar
Mahringer, C. (2019). Exploring Routine Ecologies: A Characterization and Integration of Different Perspectives on Routines. PhD, Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayhew, A. (2008) Institutions, culture and values. In Davis, J. B. and Dolfsma, W., eds., The Elgar Companion to Social Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 2843.Google Scholar
Mol, A. M. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249273.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 14351448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. and Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433474.Google Scholar
Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413453.Google Scholar
Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G. and Shah, R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 730748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793815.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2007). Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 781795.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235250.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Mahringer, C., Dittrich, K., Feldman, M. S. and Ryan Wolf, J. (2020). Process multiplicity and process dynamics: Weaving the space of possible paths. Organization Theory. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720963138.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484510.Google Scholar
Porter, M. and Siggelkow, N. (2008). Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2), 3456.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. and Rerup, C. (2017). Opening the black box: Microfoundations of institutions. In Greenwood, R. et al., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, pp. 311337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009). Researching strategy practices: A genealogical social theory perspective. Organization Studies, 30(7), 713734.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243263.Google Scholar
Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynaud, B. (2005). The void at the heart of rules: Routines in the context of rule-following. The case of the Paris Metro Workshop. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 847871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2009). Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20(2), 384409.Google Scholar
Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2018). Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 170209.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Walsh, G., Lehnert, F., trans. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1970). Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, Zaner, R. M., ed., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sele, K. and Grand, S. (2016). Unpacking the dynamics of ecologies of routines: Mediators and their generative effects in routine interactions. Organization Science, 27(3), 722738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevon, G. (1996). Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In Czarniawska, B. and Sevon, G., eds., Translating Organizational Change. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. Basingstoke: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Smets, M., Aristidou, A. and Whittington, R. (2017). Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. In Greenwood, R. et al., ed., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, pp. 384411.Google Scholar
Somers, M. R. and Gibson, G. D. (1994). Reclaiming the epistemological ‘other’: Narrative and the social constitution of identity. In Calhoun, C., (ed.), Social Theory and Political Identity. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3799.Google Scholar
Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P. and Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 27(3), 759781.Google Scholar
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387420.Google Scholar
Stene, E. O. (1940). An approach to a science of administration. American Political Science Review, 34(6), 11241137.Google Scholar
Suchman, L. A. (1983). Office procedure as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 1(4), 320328.Google Scholar
Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567582.Google Scholar
Turner, S. F. and Fern, M. J. (2012). Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: The effects of experience and context change. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 14071434.Google Scholar
Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. P. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 2446.Google Scholar
Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. P. (2018). Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 12531280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systematic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Weske, M. (2019). Business Process Management. Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 3rd ed. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy practice and strategy process: Family differences and the sociological eye. Organization Studies, 28(10), 15751586.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991995.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2013). Habit, deliberation, and action: Strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 120137.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Anscombe, G. M.. London: Blackwell. [Orig. pub. 1953.]Google Scholar
Yi, S., Knudsen, T. and Becker, M. C. (2016). Inertia in routines: A hidden source of organizational variation. Organization Science, 27(3), 782800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zbaracki, M. J. and Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×