Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-kkbsd Total loading time: 1.345 Render date: 2022-01-25T08:25:39.177Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Part III - A Researcher in the Spotlight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Patricia H. Werhane
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Sergiy Dmytriyev
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bazerman, M and Tenbrunsel, A. 2012. Blind Spots. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luchmann, T.. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). “The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension.” Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, J., & Christensen, C. (1995). “Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave.” Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 43–53. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1995/01/disruptive-technologies-catching-the-wave. Accessed May 12, 2016.
Fawcett, , and Waller, M. 2012. “The Implications of Supply Chain Management Research: You Cannot Unring a Bell.” Journal of Business Logistics. 33: 259261.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1984; 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. and Whitley, E. W., 1997. “Mental Models of Population Growth.” In Environment, Ethics, and Behavior.ed.. Bazerman, M, Messick, D., Tenbrunsel, A., and Wade-Benzoni, K.. San Francisco: New Lexington Press. 209233.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. and Blanchard, T. 2015. “Social Epistemology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social/ Accessed May 14, 2016.
Goodman, Leah M. 2015. “Why Volkswagon Cheated.” Newsweek December 15. www.newsweek.com/2015/12/15/why-volkswagen-cheated-404891.html Accessed May 13, 2016.
Gorman, Michael. 1992. Simulating Science. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1992. “Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis.” Acta Sociologica. 35. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Consruction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hargrave, Timothy. 2016. “Building on Werhane’s foundation: Toward a Theory of the Morally Imaginative Organization. “Forthcoming in Essays in Honor of Patricia H. Werhane.
Isabella, L. A. 1992. Managing the Challenge of Trigger Events: The Mindsets Governing Adaptation to Change. Business Horizons. September–October: 59–66.
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1787; 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
Maitland, Ian. 1997. “The Great Non-Debate Over International Sweatshops,” British Academy of Management Annual Conference Proceedings, September, pp. 240–265.
McVea, John, and Freeman, R. E. 2005. A Names-and-Faces Approach to Stakeholder Management. Journal of Management Inquiry. 14: 5769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, Dennis. 2006. “Ethical Blind Spots in Organizations.” Organizational Studies. 27: 413428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1990. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1993. “Putnam and the Realist Menace.” Journal of Philosophy. 90: 443461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness. trans. Barnes, Hazel. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1993. “Positional Objectivity.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 22: 119131.Google Scholar
Senge, P. M. 2006. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday: New York.Google Scholar
Shadnam, M., Crane, A. and Lawrence, T., forthcoming. “Who Calls It? Agents of the Social Construction of Organizational Moral Failure.” Presented at the biannual meeting of the Transatlantic Business Ethics Conference (TABEC), St. Galen Switzerland, September 30, 2016.
Van de Ven, Andrew and Hargrave, Timothy. 2004. “Social, Technical and Institutional Change.” in Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation. ed. Poole, Marshall Scortt and Van de Ven, Andrew. New York: Oxford University Press. 25902303.Google Scholar
Weick, KE. 1993. “The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38(4), 628652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, KE. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., Obstfield, D. 2005. “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.” Organization Science 16(4), 409421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1994. “The Normative/Descriptive Distinction in Methodologies of Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: pp. 175180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (2002). “Moral Imagination and Systems Thinking.” Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (2008). “Mental models, moral imagination and system thinking in the age of globalization.” Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 463474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L. P., Archer, C., Englehardt, E. and Pritchard, M. 2013. Obstacles to Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R. D. 1991. “The Social Construction of Business Systems in East Asia.” Organizational Studies. 12: 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astley, W. G. (1985) “Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 497513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, Richard P., and Edwards, Jeffrey R.. “A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods 1.1 (1998): 4587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldridge, David C., Floyd, Steven W., and Markóczy, Lívia. “Are Managers from Mars and Academicians from Venus? Toward an Understanding of the Relationship between Academic Quality and Practical Relevance.” Strategic Management Journal 25.11 (2004): 10631074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The Pragmatic Turn, (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1995) “Darwin’s Dangerous Idea.” The Sciences 35.3: 3440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1908/1998) “Does Reality Possess Practical Character?The Essential John Dewey Volume 1, Hickman, L. and Alexander, T. (eds.), (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1930/1998) “What I BelieveThe Essential John Dewey Volume 1, Hickman, L. and Alexander, T. (eds.), (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Dewey, John. Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi, 1998.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 7, (2008) 1925–1953: 1932, Ethics. Vol. 7. SIU Press.Google Scholar
Durand, R., and Vaara, E. (2009) “Causation, Counterfactuals, and Competitive Advantage,” Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 12451264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., and De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2004) “Book Review Essay: The Relevance of Richard Rorty to Management Research,” Academy of Management Review, 29(1): 127144.Google Scholar
Hitt, Michael A., Gimeno, Javier, and Hoskisson, Robert E.. (1998).”Current and Future Research Methods in Strategic Management.” Organizational Research Methods 1.1: 644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, Anne Sigismund. (2000) “1999 Presidential Address: Changes in Organizational Knowledge Production.” Academy of Management Review 25.2: 288293.Google Scholar
James, W. (1902/1985) The Varieties of Religious Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1907/2014), Pragmatism, (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khurana, Rakesh. (2007). “From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession.” (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Krueger, J. W. (2009). “Knowing Through the Body: the Daodejing and Dewey.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 36:1. 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larwood, Laurie, Gattiker, Urs E., (1999) eds. Impact Analysis: How Research Can Enter Application and Make a Difference. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lawler, Edward E., ed. Doing Research that is Useful for Theory and Practice. Lexington Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Kelemen, M. and Rumens, N., (2013) (eds.) American Pragmatism and Organization. (Surrey, England: Gower)Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Melis, A.P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E. and Herrman, E. (2012) “Two Key Steps in the Evolution of Human Cooperation: The Interdependence Hypothesis,” Current Anthropology, 53(6): 673692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. T. (1993) “Strategic Management and Determinism: Sustaining the Conversation,” Journal of Management Studies 30(1): 173191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. D., and Walsh, J.P. (2003) “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowday, Richard T. (1997). “Celebrating 40 Years of the Academy of Management Journal.” Academy of Management Journal 40.6: 14001414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Kevin R., and Saal, Frank E., eds. (2013) Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice. Psychology Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pappas, G. F. (Ed.). (2008). John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1878/1965) “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Purnell, L. S. and Freeman, R. E. (2012) “Stakeholder Theory, Fact/Value Dichotomy, and the Normative Core: How Wall Street Stops the Ethics Conversation, Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1): 109116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1951) “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” The Philosophical Review, 60(1): 2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1991) “Feminism and Pragmatism: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values,” (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan).
Rorty, R. (1999) Philosophy and Social Hope, (New York: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (2010) “Reply to Aldo Giorgio Gargani,” The Philosophy of Richard Rorty, Auxier, R.E. and Hahn, L. E., (eds.) (Chicago: Open Court), pp. 193195.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwab, D. P. (1980). “Construct Validity in Organizational Behavior.” In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 2). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 343.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, Paul, and Mitroff, Ian I.. (1984) “Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers’ Assumptions.” Academy of Management Review 9.1: 1826.Google Scholar
Suddaby, Roy. (2010).”Editor’s Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization.” The Academy of Management Review, 346–357.CrossRef
Wicks, A. C., and Freeman, R. E. (1998). “Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-Positivism, and the Search for Ethics.” Organization Science, 9(2), 123140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abend, G. (2010). What’s new and what’s old about the new sociology of morality. In Hitlin, S. and Valsey, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17, 432464.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (2012). Making sense of management. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Alzola, M. (2015). Virtuous persons and virtuous actions in business ethics and organizational research. Business Ethics Quarterly, Online First.CrossRef
Andreas, W. F. (2004). When in Rome… moral maturity and ethics for international economic organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 1732.Google Scholar
Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions (1st ed.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1962). Nicomachean ethics (Ostwald, M., Trans.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., and Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astley, W. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 497513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astley, W., and Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3, 443460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillie, J., and Meckler, M. R. (2012). Truth and objectivity regained. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 248260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambrough, R. (1979). Moral skepticism and moral knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baum, J. C. (2014). European and North American approaches to organizations and strategy research: An Atlantic divide? Not. Organization Science, 22, 11641679.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., and Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., and Watkins, M. (2004). Predictable surprises: The disasters you should have seen coming, and how to prevent them. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bechara, J. P., and Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Philosophy of science underlying engaged scholarship. In Van de Ven, A. H. (Ed.), Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Nice, R., Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (Nice, R., Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. N. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In Sayre-McCord, G. (Ed.), Essays on moral realism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. (1967). Ethical relativism. In Edwards, P. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brink, D. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, G. (1997). Organization paradigms. In Sorge, A. and Warner, M. (Eds.), The handbook of organization behavior. London: International Thompson Business Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37, 4759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N., and Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to do it better. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10, 119133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, T. R. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 943963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., and Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 8, 10191024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, D. D., Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., and Roengpitya, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of financial performance and quality: Fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal, 46, 1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, D. D., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., and Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directions and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, N. (1996). Justice and justification. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. The Journal of Philosophy, 60, 685700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1973). Radical interpretation. Dialectica, 27, 314328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1991). Three varieties of knowledge’. In Griffiths, A. Phillips (ed.), A. J. Ayer memorial essays: Royal institute of philosophy supplement, vol. 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deetz, S. (2009). Organizational research as alternative ways of attending to and talking about structures and activities. In Buchanan, D. and Bryman, A. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
De los Reyes, G., Kim, T. W., and Weaver, G. (Unpublished). Teaching ethics in business schools: A conversation on disciplinary differences, academic provincialism, and the case for integrated pedagogy.
DeHaan, C. R., Hirai, T., and Ryan, R. M. (2015). Nussbaum’s capabilities and self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs: Relating some fundamentals of human wellness. Journal of Happiness Studies, Online first.
DePaul, M. R. (1993). Balance and refinement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (1985). In defense of organization theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. (1994). When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 157169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2003). Organization theory as a positive science. In Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2005). For positive management theories while retaining science: Reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 109113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. (2012). The epistemic fault line in corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 37, 256271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporate concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 6591.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Walsh, J. P. (2015). Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.002.CrossRef
Doris, J. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drier, J. (1996). Expressivist embeddings and minimalist truth. Philosophical Studies, 83, 2951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1975). Hard cases. Harvard Law Review, 88, 10571109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, R. (1984). Rights as trumps. In Waldron, J. (Ed.), Theories of rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996). Objectivity and truth: You’d better believe it. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 25, 87139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M., Thrope, R., and Jackson, P. (2012). Management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R., and Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person–environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 85129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enoch, D. (2011). Taking morality seriously: A defense of robust realism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M., and Willmott, H. (2014). Registering ‘the ethical’ in organization theory formation: Toward the disclosure of an ‘invisible’ force. Organization Studies, 35, 10131039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, F. H. (2000). Keeping the tension: Pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline. Academy of Management Review, 25, 350371.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1992). In defense of moral rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 12, 149169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22, 12401253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folger, R., and Salvador, R. (2008). Is management theory too “selfish”? Journal of Management, 34, 11271151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2000). Business ethics at the millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1960). Ascriptivism. Philosophical Review, 69, 221225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 7591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S., and Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1347.Google Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1986). The constitutions of society. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gino, F., and Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(445), 459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gino, F., Ayal, S., and Ariely, D. (2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 93, 285292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gino, F., and Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 142155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A. (2003). Give it up: Reflections on the interpreted world. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 285292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, fiction, and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guillen, M. (2001). The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. E. (2012). The authority of reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (2002). No character or personality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 8794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, E. (2015). The irrelevance of moral ignorance. In Shafer-Landau, Russ (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics (Vol. 10). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hassard, J., and Kelemen, M. (2002). Production and consumption in organization knowledge. Organization, 9, 331355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A. (2015). Scorpions, cockroaches and the reality of unpleasant leaders, Financial Times: September 9. London: FT.Com.Google Scholar
Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., George, G., and Nichols, V. (2014). Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 12271234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, J. (2010). Business ethics as rational choice. Boston: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. D. (2004). For truth and realism in management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 2004.Google Scholar
John, P., and Duberley, J. (2000). Understanding management research: An introduction to epistemology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366395.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728.Google Scholar
Keeley, M. (1983). Values in organizational theory and management education. Academy of Management Review, 8, 376386.Google Scholar
Khurana, R., and Spender, J. C. (2012). Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: More than ‘a problem in organizational design’. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 619639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of highest stage of moral judgement. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 630646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (1st ed.). San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Leplin, J. (1984). Scientific realism. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. T., and Kor, Y. (2015). Advancing the human capital perspective on value creation by joining capabilities and governance approach. Academy of Management Perspectives, Online First.CrossRef
Mantere, S., and Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38, 7089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, S. (2010). Moral realism without convergence. Philosophical Topics, 38, 5990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, J. (2004). Moral intuition. In LaFollette, H. (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ethical theory. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McMahon, C. (2009). Reasonable disagreement: A theory of morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 7788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 10121027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitroff, I. I. (1972). The myth of objectivity or why science needs a new psychology of science. Management Science, 18, 613618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modzelewski, E. (2001). CMU’s Tom Kerr retiring after teaching business ethics for 35 years. Post-Gazette, April 17.
Moldoveanu, M. C., and Baum, J. A. (2005). Contemporary debates in organizational epistemology. In Baum, J. A. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.PubMed
Nystrom, P. C., and Starbuck, W. H. (1977). Why prescription is prescribed. TIMS Studies in Management Studies, 5, 15.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (2015). Leadership BS: Fixing workplaces and careers one truth at a time. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, L. E. (1986). Business and public policy. Journal of Management, 12, 261275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. P., and Jones, T. M. (1995). An agent morality view of business policy. Academy of Management Review, 20, 2242.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Risen, J. (2015). Psychologists approve ban on role in national security interrogations, New York Times: August 7.
Robertson, D. (1993). Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 585599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, J. (1991). Philosophy of social science. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (2012). Philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J. (2008). Understanding the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 213232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2014). Being realistic about reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., and Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 10961120. doi:10.2307/20159358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1962). Meaning and speech acts. Philosophical Review, 71, 423432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepielli, A. (Forthcoming). Subjective and objective reasons. In Daniel Star (Ed.), Oxford handbook of reasons and normativity. Oxford University Press.
Setiya, K. (2015). Knowing right from wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: A defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, C., and Challenger, R. (2013). Revisiting paradigm(s) in management research: A rhetorical analysis of the paradigm wars. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 225244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1967). The business school: A problem in organizational design. Journal of Management Studies, 4, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1977). Models of discovery: And other topics in the methods of science. Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2000). Expressivism and embedding. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 677693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sison, A. J. G. (2014). Happiness and virtue ethics in business: The ultimate value proposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, J. (2010). The domain of reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in perspective: Selected essays in epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steup, M., and Sosa, E. (2005). Contemporary debates in epistemology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strudler, A. (2005). Deception unraveled. Journal of Philosophy, 102(9), 458473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571610.Google Scholar
Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506521.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., and Smith-Crown, K. (2008). Ethical decision-making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. In Walsh, J. P. and Brief, A. P. (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals, 2 (pp. 545607). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. (1990). The realm of rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 113128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., and Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. (2013). The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 9, 375394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maanen, J. (1995a). Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organization Science, 6, 687692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maanen, J. (1995b). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6, 133143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (Ed.). (1984). Theories of rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., Reynolds, S. J., and Brown, M. E. (2014). Moral intuition: Connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice. Journal of Management, 40, 100129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Newbury Park: SAGE.Google Scholar
Wellman, C. (1963). The ethical implications of cultural relativity. Journal of Philosophy, 60, 169184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, L. (2005). The nature of rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33, 223253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, L. (2008). The analysis of rights. In Kramer, M., Grant, C., Colburn, B., and Hatzistavrou, A. (Eds.), The legacy of H.L.A. Hart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (1994). The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 175180.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, R., and Clegg, S. (2002). Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis: The need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business and Society, 35, 89118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, A. C., and Freeman, R. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9, 123140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, J. 1975 (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2005). The economics of governance. American Economic Review, 95, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, J. G., Sarasvathy, S. D., and Wicks, A. (2013). An entrepreneurial perspective on value creation in public-private ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35, 307309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, E. J., and Westphal, J. D. (1994). The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 121142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zald, M. N. (1991). Sociology as a discipline: Quasi-science and quasi-humanities (pp. 165187). Fall/Winter: The American Sociologist, Fall/Winter 165–187Google Scholar
Zald, M. N. (1993). Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualiza. Organization Science, 4, 513527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (1971). The power and pathology of imprisonment. Congressional Record. (Serial No. 15, October 25, 1971). Hearings before Subcommittee No. 3, of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 92nd Congress, First Session on Corrections, Part II, Prisons, Prison Reform and Prisoners’ Rights: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Zingales, L. (2000). In search of new foundations. Journal of Finance, 55, 16231653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Roger T. (1981). “Wu-wei in ‘The Art of Rulership’ Chapter of the Huai Nan Tzu: Its Sources and Philosophical Orientation.” Philosophy East and West 31: 2 (April 1981): 193213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Roger T., and Rosemont, Henry Jr., translators (1998). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Chuang, Tzu (1964). Basic Writings. Translated by Watson, Burton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cornish, Sally (2011). Negative capability and social work: Insights from Keats, Bion, and business. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(2): 135148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fingarette, Herbert (1972). Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
French, Robert B. (2004). “Negative Capability.” In Encyclopedia of Leadership. Edited by Goethals, George R., Seroenson, Georgia J., and Burns, James MacGregor III (10771080). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
French, Robert B. (2001). “‘Negative Capability’: Managing the Confusing Uncertainties of Change”. Journal of Organizational Change Management 14(5): 480492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A. C. (1989). Disputers of the Dao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hall, David L., and Ames, Roger T. (1995). Anticipating China: Thinking through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hall, David L., and Ames, Roger T. (1998). Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Han, Fei Tzu (1964). Basic Writings. In Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. Translated by Watson, Burton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Yong, & Altman, Yochanan (2009). “Supervisor and Subordinate Guanxi: A Grounded Investigation in the People’s Republic of China.” In Journal of Business Ethics 88, Supplement 1: Business Ethics in Greater China: 91104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrigel, Eugen (1953). Zen and the Art of Archery. Trans. Hull, R. F. C.. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hershock, Peter D. (2012). Valuing Diversity: Buddhist Reflection on Realizing a More Equitable Global Future. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hsün, Tzu (1964). Basic Writings. In Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. Translated by Watson, Burton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jullien, François (1995). The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China. Translated by Lloyd, Janet. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Keats, John (1970). The Letters of John Keats: A Selection. Edited by Gittings, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koehn, Daryl (2001). “Confucian Trustworthiness and the Practice of Business in China.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11: 415429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lao, Tzu (1963). Tao Te Ching. Translated by Lao, D. C.. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Loy, David (1985). “Wei-Wu-Wei: Nondual Action,” Philosophy East and West 35: 7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencius, (1970). Mencius. Translated by Lau, D. C.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mo, Tzu (1964). Basic Writings. In Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. Translated by Watson, Burton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ou, Li (2009). Keats and Negative Capability. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Saggurthi, Suneetha, & Thakur, Munish K. (2016). “Usefulness of Uselessness: A Case for Negative Capability in Management.” Academy of Management Learning and Education, 15(1): 180193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaja, Henry (1998). “How to Interpret Chapter 16 of the Zhuangzi: ‘Repairers of Nature (Shan Xing).’” In Wandering at Ease in the Zhuangzi, edited by Ames, Roger T. (101124). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Peter, French, Robert & Harvey, Charles E. (2002). “Leadership and Negative Capability,” Human Relations, 55(10): 12091226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slingerland, Edward. Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Su, Chenting, Sirgy, M. Joseph and James, E. (2003). “Is Guanxi Orientation Bad, Ethically Speaking? A Study of Chinese Enterprises.” Journal of Business Ethics 44: 303312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Chenting, Mitchell, Ronald K., and Joseph Sirgy, M. (2007). “Enabling Guanxi Management in China: A Hierarchical Stakeholder Model of Effective Guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics 71: 301319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suen, Henry, Cheung, Sai-On, & Mondejar, Reuben (2007). “Managing Ethical Behavior in Construction Organizations in Asia: How Do the Teachings of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism and Globalization Influence Ethics Management?International Journal of Project Management 25: 257265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun-Tzu (1993). The Art of Warfare. Translated by Ames, Roger T.. New York: Ballantine Books.Google ScholarPubMed
Warden, Clyde A., and Chen, Judy F. (2009). “Chinese Negotiators’ Subjective Variations in Intercultural Negotiations,” Journal of Business Ethics 88: 529537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Cheng Lu, and Lin, Xiaohua (2009). “Migration of Chinese Consumption Values: Traditions, Modernization, and Cultural Renaissance. Journal of Business Ethics 88: 399409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Lei, and Juslin, Heikki (2009). “The Impact of Chinese Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Harmony Approach,” Journal of Business Ethics 88: 433451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Burton, translator (1964). Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yi, and Zhang, Zigang (2006). “Guanxi and Organizational Dynamics in China: A Link Between Individual and Organizational Levels. Journal of Business Ethics 67: 375392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar