Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T12:54:10.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Normative Approaches

from Part I - Philosophical Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Patricia H. Werhane
DePaul University, Chicago
R. Edward Freeman
University of Virginia
Sergiy Dmytriyev
University of Virginia
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Childress, James F., and Beauchamp, Tom L.. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1979. Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. The Journal of Philosophy, 76(5): 256282.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 1981. Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Large Organizations: the Pinto case. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, I: 114.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 1990. Ethics and Coherence. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 64(3): 3952.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2003. The Ethics of Information Technology and Business. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2006a. The History of Business Ethics. In Epstein, Marc and Hanson, Kirk (eds.) The Accountable Corporation. Vol. II, p. 4758. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2006b. The Relevance of Philosophy to Business Ethics: A Response to Rorty’s “Is Philosophy Relevant to Applied Ethics?” Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(3): 381389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2010. Business Ethics. (7th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. (1st, 2nd, 3rd eds., N.Y.: Macmillan and London: Collier, 1982, 1986, 1990; 4rd-6th eds., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1995, 1999, 2006.)Google Scholar
De George, Richard T., Gert, Bernard, and Magnell, Thomas. 1994. The Place for Coherence and Moral Rules in Ethics: Richard De George and Bernard Gert (Dialogue moderated and edited by Thomas Magnell). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 28(3): 463479.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, David. 2003. Common Morality: Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13(5): 219230Google Scholar
DeMarco, Joseph P. 1997. Coherence and Applied Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14(3): 289300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePaul, Michael. 1987. Two Conceptions of Coherence Methods in Ethics. Mind, 96: 384, 463481.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael. 1988. The Problem of the Criterion and Coherence Methods in Ethics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18(1): 6786.Google Scholar
Dorsey, Dale. 2006. A Coherence Theory of Truth in Ethics. Philosophical Studies, 127: 493523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowie, Mark. 1977. Pinto Madness, Mother Jones, September/October, 24–28.Google Scholar
Engel, Mylan Jr. 2012. Coherentism and the Epistemic Justification of Moral Beliefs: A Case Study in How to Do Practical Ethics Without Appeal to a Moral Theory. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50(1): 5074.Google Scholar
Guarini, Marcello. 2007. Computation, Coherence, and Ethical Reasoning. Minds and Machines, 17: 2746.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651/2017. Leviathan. Part I, chapter 13. Web site retrieved April 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. B. 1974–1975. The independence of moral theory. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, XLVII, 522.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1987. The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1): 125.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul. 1998. Ethical Coherence. Philosophical Psychology, 11(4): 405419.Google Scholar


Bartlett, C. A., “ABB’s Relays Business: Building and Managing a Global Matrix,” Harvard Business School Case 394016 (1993).Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H. and Tenbrunsel, A. E., Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What To Do About It, Princeton University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. E., “The Basis of Value Judgments in Economics,” in Human Values and Economic Policy, Hook, S. (ed.), New York University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Bromiley, P. and Cummings, L. Transaction Costs in Organizations with Trust,” in Bies, R. J., Lewicki, R., and Shepard, B. (eds.) Research on Negotiations in Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1995.Google Scholar
Case, J. Open Book Management, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F., Trust, New York: The Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Foundation of the Metaphysics of Morals, 1785 Beck, L.W. Trans. New York: Macmillan, 1990.Google Scholar
Kant, I.Metaphysical Principles of Virtue,” The Metaphysics of Morals, 1797 in Kant’s Ethical Philosophy, 2nd ed. Ellington, James W. 1994. trans. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C., Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O., Constructions of Reason, Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., and Thaler, R. H, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., and Reynolds, S. J., “Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review,” Journal of Management, 32 (2006) 951990.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats