Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-trcsx Total loading time: 1.722 Render date: 2022-01-20T21:05:50.081Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }
Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

Book contents

Part II - Empirical Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Edited by
Patricia H. Werhane ,
R. Edward Freeman  and
Sergiy Dmytriyev
Patricia H. Werhane
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Sergiy Dmytriyev
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility , pp. 87 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Arnold, D. G., & Harris, J. D. (2012). Kantian Business Ethics: Critical Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, A. (2004). Einleitung: Governance: Modebegriff oder Nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? In Benz, A. (Ed.) Governance: Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: Eine Einführung (11–28). Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmann, James, & Rehg, William (2014). Jürgen Habermas. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2014 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archies/fall2014/entries/habermas/.
Bowie, N. E. (1998). A Kantian Theory of Meaningful Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, N. E. (1999). Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Hamlin, A., & Pettit, P. (Eds.), The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State (pp. 18–34). Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1997a). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Bohmann, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 67–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1997b). Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In Bohmann, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 407–437). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. (2013). Reflective Equilibrium. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/reflective-equilibrium/.
Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism - Private Transnational Governance and Its Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eucken, Walter (1948). Das ordnungspolitische Problem. ORDO, 1, 56–90.Google Scholar
Eucken, Walter (2004 [1952]). Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik. Edited by Eucken, Edith and Paul Hensel, K.. UTB: Tübingen.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability: The Ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk-Mazouz, N. (2004). Perspektiven der Diskursethik. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1971 [1962]). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft (5th ed.). Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung; Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984 [1981]). The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society) (McCarthy, T., Trans.). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989 [1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (Ed.). (1990). Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification - Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Lenhart, C., Weber-Nicholson, S. Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990 [1983]). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Lenhardt, C., Weber-Nicholson, S. Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1993 [1991]). Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996 [1992]). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001). The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Homann, K. (2006). Competition and Morality. Discussion Paper of the Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics, (4), 1–20.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1896 [1739]). A Treatise of Human Nature. Reprinted from the original edition in three volumes and edited, with an analytical index, by Shelby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D. (1993). Method and Moral Theory. In Singer, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 476–487) Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jastram, S. (2012). Legitimation privater Governance - Chancen und Probleme am Beispiel von ISO 26000. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jastram, S., & Prescher, J. (2014). Legitimizing Corporate Social Responsibility Governance. In: Frederiksen, C., Strue, C., Idowu, S. O., Mermod, A. Y., & Nielsen, M. E. J. (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance: Practice and Theory (pp. 39–61). Cham. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Jastram, S., & Schneider, A.-M. (2015). Sustainable Fashion Governance at the Example of the Partnership for Sustainable Textiles. Umweltwirtschaftsforum. 23 (4), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jastram, S. (Forthcoming). Habermas’ Theorie und die Legitimation von Multi-Stakeholder-Verfahren in der Praxis. In Scholz, M. & Czuray, M. (Eds.), ISO 26000 und ONR 192500: Leitlinien und Normen zur Unternehmensverantwortung. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.
Kant, I. (1998 [1781]). Critique of Pure Reason. In Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W. (Eds.) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W. Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2002 [1785]). In Wood, A. W. (Ed.), Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals [Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten] (Wood, A. W. Trans.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. (2008). Globalization, Transnational Corporations, and the Future of Global Governance. In Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (pp. 249–272). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Krentz, E. (1975). The Historical-Critical Method. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). What is Stakeholder Democracy? Perspectives and Issues. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 6-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueckenberger, U., & Jastram, S. (2010). Transnational Norm-building Networks and the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1993). Kantian Ethics. In Singer, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 175–185). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. J., & Bowie, N. E. (2004). A Kantian Perspective on the Characteristics of Ethics Programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. (2015). Moral Realism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2015 Edition, Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/moral-realism/
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann-Pauly, D. (2013). Democratizing Corporate Governance: Compensating for the Democratic Deficit of Corporate Political Activity and Corporate Citizenship. Business & Society, 52(3), 473–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The Business Firm as a Political Actor: A New Theory of the Firm for a Globalizaed World. Business & Society, 53(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility: New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. A. (2010). Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(1), 5-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (1993). Moral Realism. In Singer, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 15–37). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2004 [1919]). The Vocation Lectures. Translated by Livingstone, R.. Edited by Owen, D. & Strong, T.. Illinois: Hackett Books.Google Scholar
Wörsdörfer, M. (2010). On the Economic Ethics of Walter Eucken. In Konrad Adenauer Foundation (Ed.), Sixty Years of Social Market Economy: Formation, Development and Perspectives of a Peacemaking Formula (pp. 21–42). Sankt Augustin: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2004). Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 260–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, A. M. and Carroll, M. S. (1995) Your place or mine?: the effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society and Natural Resources 8(5):381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, A. W. (1997) Teaching business ethics: the role of ethics in business and business education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodpaster, K. (1983) The concept of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 2, p. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilby, R. W. (1993), The Study of Human Values. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kim, T. W. & Donaldson, T. (2016) Rethinking right: moral epistemology in management research. Journal of Bus Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015–3009-2.CrossRef
Rokeach, (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Roojen, M. (2013). Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Werhane, P. H. (1994). The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, A. C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis: the need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business & Society 35: 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: positivism, anti- positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9: 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. 2000. Reflexive Methodology, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bevan, D. 2007. Accountability and empire: insights from the experiences of senior managers at a FTSE100 firm. PhD thesis, King’s College London.Google Scholar
Bevan, D. 2008. Continental philosophy: a grounded theory approach and the emergence of convenient and inconvenient ethics. In: Painter-Morland, M. & Werhane, P. (eds.) Cutting-edge Issues in Business Ethics: Continental Challenges to Tradition and Practice. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Carrascoso, A. S. 2009. The identity – strategy link: Context, driver and consequences for firm internationalization. (Unpublished PhD dissertation in Business Administration). University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
Carrascoso, A. S. 2011. The ethical issues surrounding network-expansion strategies in SME internationalization: an empirical investigation. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 30(1/2), 71–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2005. Grounded theory in the twenty-first century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Christiansen, O. 2006. Opportunizing: a classic grounded theory study on business and management. Grounded Theory Review, 6, 109–133.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 1997. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among five Traditions, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2008. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E. & Dukerich, J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. 1965. Awareness of Dying, Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. 1968. Time for Dying, Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. 1971. Status Passage, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google ScholarPubMed
Goulding, C. 2002. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, E. 1987. Qualitative research traditions: a review. Review of Educational Research, 57, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, E. 2004. Otherwise than Being – or beyond Essence, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. 2005. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, K. 2001. Grounded Theory in Management Research, London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. 1998. Managing the post-merger aftermath by default remodelling. Management Decision, 36, 102–110, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munhall, P. L. & Oiler, C. J. (eds.) 1986. Nursing Research: a qualitative perspective, Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Painter-Morland, M. & Werhane, P. (eds.) 2008. Cutting-edge Issues in Business Ethics: Continental Challenges to Tradition and Practice. New York, NY; Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1998). The ethnographer’s method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ailon, G. (2011). Mapping the cultural grammar of reflexivity: The case of the Enron scandal. Economy and Society, 40(1), 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ailon, G. (2013). From superstars to devils: The ethical discourse on managerial figures involved in a corporate scandal. Organization, 22(1), 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alasuutari, P. (1995). Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2011a). Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations, 64(9), 1121–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2011b). Organizational discourse analysis – well done or too rare? A reply to our critics. Human Relations, 64(9), 1193–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2013). The closing of critique, pluralism and reflexivity: A response to Hardy and Grant and some wider reflections. Human Relations, 66(10), 1353–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D. & Wodak, R. (2014). The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s publishing company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2011), Discourse(s), social construction and language practices: In conversation with Alvesson and Kärreman. Human Relations, 64(9), 1177–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, G. (2009). Critical, Social and Environmental Accounting: Prospects and Possibilities for Gramscian Intellectual Praxis in a Globalising World. Doctoral thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Brei, V., & Böhm, S. (2014). “1L= 10L for Africa”: Corporate social responsibility and the transformation of bottled water into a “consumer activist” commodity. Discourse & Society, 25(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhr, N. & Reiter, S. (2006). Ideology, the environment and one worldview: A discourse analysis of Noranda’s environmental and sustainable development reports. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 3, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, V. (1995). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 649–672.Google Scholar
Caruana, R., & Crane, A. (2008). Constructing consumer responsibility: Exploring the role of corporate communications. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1495–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedeström, C. & Spicer, A. (2014). Discourse of the real kind: A post-foundational approach to organizational discourse analysis. Organization, 21(2), 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalaby, J. K. (1996). Beyond the prison-house of language: Discourse as a sociological concept. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 684–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in organization studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1213–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: Sage.Google Scholar
de Graaf, G. (2001). Discourse theory and business ethics: The case of bankers’ conceptualizations of customers. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, G. (2006). Discourse and descriptive business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(3), 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksson, P. & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative Methods in Business Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T. & Putnam, L. L (2014). Organizational discourse analysis. In Putnam, L. L. & Mumby, D. K. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods (3rd ed.) (271–296). London: SageGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fyke, J. P., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2013). The ethics of conscious capitalism: Wicked problems in leading change and changing leaders. Human Relations, 66(12), 1619–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 1–37.CrossRef
Gill, R. (1993). Ideology, gender and popular radio: A discourse analytic approach. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 323–349.Google Scholar
Glynos, J. & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grant, D. & Hardy, C. (2004). Introduction: Struggles with organizational discourse. Organization Studies, 25(1), 5–13Google Scholar
Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (Eds). (1998). Discourse and Organization. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustavsson, E., & Czarniawska, B. (2004). Web Woman: The on-line construction of corporate and gender images. Organization, 11(5), 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. & Phillips, N. (1999). No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system. Organization Studies, 20(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C. & Thomas, R. (2015). Discourse in a material world. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C. & Grant, D. (2012). Readers beware: Provocation, problematization and … problems. Human Relations, 65(5), 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkinen, A. (2014). Discursive Constructions of Climate Change Engagement in Business Organisations. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Herzig, C. & Moon, J. (2013). Discourses on corporate social ir/responsibility in the financial sector. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1870–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iedema, R. (2011). Discourse studies in the twenty-first century: A response to Mats Alvesson and Dan Kärreman’s “Decolonializing discourse.” Human Relations, 64(9), 1163–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joutsenvirta, M. (2009). A language perspective to environmental management and corporate responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joutsenvirta, M. (2011). Setting boundaries for corporate social responsibility: Firm–NGO relationship as discursive legitimation struggle. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laine, M. (2005). Meanings of the term “sustainable development” in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum, 29, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, M. (2009). Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes? A longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1029–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, M. (2010). Towards sustaining status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures 1987–2005. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lämsä, A-M. & Tiensuu, T. (2002). Representations of the woman leader in Finnish business media articles. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtimäki, H. & Kujala, J. (2015). Framing dynamically changing firm–stakeholder relationships in an international dispute over a foreign investment: A discursive analysis approach. Business & Society, doi: 0007650315570611.
Livesey, S. M. (2002). Global warming wars: rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to Exxonmobil’s corporate public discourse. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, A. (2002). Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, M. (2003). Exploring Media Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, H. (2013). On the ideological role of employee reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 24(4–5), 360–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkelä, H. & Laine, M. (2011). A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports. Accounting Forum, 31(4), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, M., Tregidga, H. and Walton, S. (2009). Words not action! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(8), 1211–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumby, D. K. (2011). What’s cooking in organizational discourse studies? A response to Alvesson and Kärreman. Human Relations 64(9), 1147–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, D. & Wright, C. (2012). Justifying business responses to climate change: discursive strategies of similarity and difference. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1819–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswick, C., Keenoy, T. W. & Grant, D. (2000). Discourse, organizations and organizing: concepts, objects and subjects. Human Relations, 53 (9), 1115–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. & Hardy, C. (1997). Managing multiple identities: Discourse, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4, 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. & Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 435–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Sewell, G. & Jaynes, S. (2008). Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 770–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Prasad, P. & Elmes, M. (2005). In the name of the practical: Unearthing the hegemony of pragmatics in the discourse of environmental management. Journal of Management Studies, 42(4), 845–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L. & Fairhurst, G. (2001). Discourse analysis in organizations: Issues and concerns. In Jablin, F. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication (78–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Putnam, L. L. (2015). Unpacking the dialectic: Alternative views on the discourse–materiality relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 706–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romani, L. & Szkudlarek, B. (2014). The struggles of the interculturalists: Professional ethical identity and early stages of codes of ethics development. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siltaoja, M. (2009). On the discursive construction of a socially responsible organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siltaoja, M. E. & Onkila, T. J. (2013). Business in society: the construction of business-society relations in responsibility reports from a critical discursive perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(4), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Spence, C. (2007). Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(6), 855–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, C. (2009). Social accounting’s emancipatory potential. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of Behaviour: Q-technique and Its Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and Modern Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tregidga, H. & Milne, M. J. (2006). From sustainable management to sustainable development: A longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tregidga, H., Kearins, K. & Milne, M. (2013). The politics of knowing “organizational sustainable development.” Organization & Environment, 26(1), 102–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tregidga, H., Milne, M. & Kearins, K. (2014). (Re)presenting “sustainable organizations.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. (2010). Taking the linguistic turn seriously: Strategy as a multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon. Advances in Strategic Management, 27(1), 29–50.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). The study of discourse. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process, (1–34). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Introduction: The study of discourse. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (2nd ed.) (1–7). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, S. (2007). Site the mine in our backyard! Discursive strategies of community stakeholders in an environmental conflict in New Zealand. Organization & Environment, 20(2), 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H. and Glavas, A. 2012. “What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda.” Journal of Management, 38:4, 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apple 2010. Apple Supplier Responsibility 2010 Progress Report. Cupertino, CA: Apple.
Bain, W. A. 1995. “Ethical problems in ethics research.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 4:1, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. C., Campbell, D. and Shrives, P. J. 2010. “Content analysis in environmental reporting research: enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context.” The British Accounting Review, 42:3, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W. C. and Holbert, L. R. 2008. “Empirical intersections in communication research: replication, multiple quantitative methods, and bridging the quantitative–qualitative divide.” Journal of Communication, 58:4, 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, B. 1952. Content Analysis in Communications Research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bjerregaard, T. and Lauring, J. 2013. “Managing contradictions of corporate social responsibility: The sustainability of diversity in a frontrunner firm.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 22:2, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigley, S. 1995. “Business ethics in context: Researching with case studies.” Journal of Business Ethics, 14:3, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, A. 2008. “The end of the paradigm wars?.” In Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L. and Brennan, J. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods: 13–25. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Tannenbaum, E., Fording, R., Hearl, D., Kim, H. M., McDonald, M. and Mendes, S. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945–1998: Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caiani, M. and Parenti, L. 2011. “The Spanish extreme right and the Internet.” Análise Social, 46:201, 719–740.Google Scholar
Calabretta, G., Durisin, B. and Ogliengo, M. 2011. “Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in business ethics: A journey through the history, the classics, and the pillars of Journal of Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics, 104:4, 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. J. 2003. “Intra- and intersectoral effects in environmental disclosures: evidence for legitimacy theory? Business Strategy and the Environment, 12:6, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canary, H. E. and Jennings, M. M. 2008. “Principles and influences in codes of ethics: A centering resonance analysis comparing pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley codes of ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics, 80:2, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, W. and Moon, J. 2005. “Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting.” Business & Society, 44:4, 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. and Bouvain, P. 2009. “Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany.” Journal of Business Ethics, 87:1, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christen, M., Fischer, J., Huppenbauer, M., Tanner, C. and van Schaik, C. 2014. Empirically Informed Ethics: Morality Between Facts and Norms. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corman, S. R. and Dooley, K. 2006. Crawdad Text Analysis System 2.0. Chandler, AZ: Crawdad Technologies, LLC.Google Scholar
Cowton, C. J. 1998. “The use of secondary data in business ethics research.” Journal of Business Ethics, 17:4, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, A. 1999. “Are you ethical? Please tick yes or no on researching ethics in business organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics, 20:3, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dando, N. and Swift, T. 2003. “Transparency and assurance: minding the credibility gap.” Journal of Business Ethics, 44:2/3, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danowski, J. A. 1993. “Network analysis of message content.” In Richards, W. D. Jr. and Barnett, G.A. (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences IV: 197–221. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Dawkins, J. 2004. “Corporate responsibility: The communication challenge.” Journal of Communication Management, 9:2, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, G. 2006. “Discourse and descriptive business ethics.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 15:3, 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, J. 2011. “Pluralistic business ethics: The significance and justification of moral free space in integrative social contracts theory.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 20:3, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W. 1999. Ties That Bind. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M., McIntosh, W., Lin, J. and Cates, C. 2007. “Recounting the courts? Applying automated content analysis to enhance empirical legal research.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4:4, 1007–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, B. and Cobbin, D. 2000. “A content analysis of codes of ethics from fifty-seven national accounting organisations.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 9:3, 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieseler, C. 2011. “On the corporate social responsibility perceptions of equity analysts.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 20:2, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxconn 2010. “Corporate social and environmental responsibility annual report 2010.” Tucheng: Foxconn.
Frostenson, M., Helin, S. and Sandström, J. 2011. “Organising corporate responsibility communication through filtration: A study of web communication patterns in Swedish retail.” Journal of Business Ethics, 100:1, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Früh, W. 2007. Inhaltsanalyse: Theorie und Praxis. [Content Analysis: Theory and Practice.]. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Gatti, L. and Seele, P. 2014. “Evidence for the prevalence of the sustainability concept in European corporate responsibility reporting.” Sustainability Science, 9:1, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2010. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Golob, U. and Podnar, K. 2014. “Critical points of CSR-related stakeholder dialogue in practice.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 23:3, 248–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, L. M. and Chalmeta, R. 2011. “Corporate responsibility in U.S. corporate websites: A pilot study.” Public Relations Review, 37:1, 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haniffa, R. M. and Cooke, T. E. 2005. “The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24:5, 391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, H. 2001. “Content analysis of secondary data: A study of courage in managerial decision making.” Journal of Business Ethics, 34:3/4, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidbrink, L. and Seele, P. 2007. “Who responds to whom? Corporate culture and the question of communicating responsibility.” CRR Working paper, 2/2007.
Hill, H., Hickman, J. and McLendon, J. 2001. “Cults and sects and doomsday groups, oh my: Media treatment of religion on the eve of the millennium.” Review of Religious Research, 43:1, 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghiemstra, R. 2000. “Corporate communication and impression management: New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting.” Journal of Business Ethics, 27:1/2, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idowu, S. O. and Towler, B. A. 2004. “A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies.” Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15:4, 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahdi, K. S. and Acikdilli, G. 2009. “Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding?” Journal of Business Ethics, 88:1, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konkle, B. E. 2004. “Scholastic journalism articles in school activities from 1934–1967: what many educators in the U.S. read about the student press.” Paper for the AEJMC Scholastic Journalism Division Research Paper Competition, Mid-winter meeting, St. Petersburg, FL, January 2005.
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. 1927. Propaganda Technique in the World War. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Laver, M. and Garry, J. 2000. “Estimating policy positions from political texts.” American Journal of Political Science, 44:3, 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M., Benoit, K. and Garry, J. 2003. “Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data.” American Political Science Review, 97:2, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. M. and James, E. H. 2007. “She’E’Os: Gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments.” Strategic Management Journal, 28:3, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, I. and Seele, P. 2015. “Analyzing sector-specific CSR reporting: Social and environmental disclosure to investors in the chemicals and banking and insurance industry.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22:2, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Z., Liang, D., Yu, K. H. and Lee, Y. 2012. “Most refd business ethics publications: Mapping the intellectual structure of business ethics studies in 2001–2008.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 21:3, 286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maignan, I. and Ralston, D. 2002. “Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses’ self-presentations.” Journal of International Business Studies, 33:3, 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayring, P. H. 1993. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. [Qualitative Content Analysis: Basics and Techniques.]. Weinheim: Beltz/UTB.Google Scholar
Moosmayer, D. C. 2012. “Negativity bias in consumer price response to ethical information.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 21:2, 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A. and Capriotti, P. 2009. “Communicating CSR, citizenship and sustainability on the web.” Journal of Communication Management, 13:2, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morsing, M. and Schultz, M. 2006. “Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 15:4, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla, Z. R. and Premarajan, R. K. 2008. “Strategic human resource management in Indian IT companies: development and validation of a scale.” VISION. The Journal of Business Perspective, 12:2, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nacos, B. L., Shapiro, R. Y., Young, J. T., Fan, D. P., Kjellstrand, T. and McCaa, C. 2009. Comparing human coding and a computer-assisted method. In Krippendorff, K. and Bock, M. A. (Eds.), The Content Analysis Reader: 243–252. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A. E. and Thomsen, C. 2009. “Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 18:1, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, A. and Shumate, M. 2010. “An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication.” Management Communication Quarterly, 24:4, 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A. G. 2006. “Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative frame-work.” Journal of Business Ethics, 66:1, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popping, R. 2000. Computer-Assisted Text Analysis. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, R., Poomkaew, B. and Nath, P. 2014. “The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 23:2, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D. M. and Gibson, A. M. 1990. “Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment.” Journal of Business Ethics, 9:6, 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, C. D. and Dervin, B. 2012. “Comparing situated sense-making processes in virtual worlds: application of Dervin’s sense-making methodology to media reception situations.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18:1, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, M. and Yuthas, K. 2008. “Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting.” Journal of Business Ethics, 78:1/2, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. and Fico, F. 1998. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. C. 1993. “Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions.” Journal of Business Ethics, 12:8, 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rössler, P. 2005. Inhaltsanalyse [Content Analysis]. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Sachs, W., Dieleman, M., Fendt, J., Kaminska-Labbé, R., Thomas, C., and McKelvey, B. 2006. “Managing dilemmas in organizations: Irregular oscillation and coevolving causalities.” Working Paper, Anderson School, UCLA.
Scherer, A. G. and Palazzo, G. 2007. “Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective.” Academy of Management Review, 32:4, 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. and Palazzo, G. 2011. “The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy.” Journal of Management Studies, 48:4, 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöneborn, D. 2011. “Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective.” Management Communication Quarterly, 25:4, 663–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seele, P. 2012. “Triple-profitability-bottom line: Supplier responsibility in a multistakeholder perspective and the power of the markets in the Apple–Foxconn case.” CRR Working papers, 11/2012.
Shocker, A. D. and Sethi, S. P. 1974. “An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing corporate action strategies.” In Sethi, S.P. (Ed.), The Unstable Ground: Corporate Social Policy in a Dynamic Society: 67–80. Los Angeles, CA: Melville.Google Scholar
Slapin, J. B. and Proksch, S.-V. 2008. “A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts.” American Journal of Political Science, 52:3, 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S. and Ogilvie, D. M. (Eds.) 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sweeney, L. and Coughlan, J. 2008. “Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 14:2, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K. and Gupta, R. K. 2011. “Researches in corporate social responsibility: a review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies.” Journal of Business Ethics, 101:3, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, L. and Li, H. 2009. “Corporate social responsibility communication of Chinese and global corporations in China.” Public Relations Review, 35:3, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M. and Kirchoff, J. F. 2010. “Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management.” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46:1, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toppinen, A. and Korhonen-Kurki, K. 2013. “Global reporting initiative and social impact in managing corporate responsibility: A case study of three multinationals in the forest industry.” Business Ethics: A European Review, 22:2, 202–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Liedekerke, L. and Dubbink, W. 2008. “Twenty years of European business ethics: Past developments and future concerns.” Journal of Business Ethics, 82:2, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyakarnam, S. 1995. “FOCUS: Focus groups: Are they viable in ethics research?” Business Ethics: A European Review, 4:1, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldner, C. 2012. “Do public and private recruiters look for different employees? The role of public service motivation.” International Journal of Public Administration, 35:1, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1994. “The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 4:2, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackert, L. F., Church, B. K., Kuang, X. J., & Qi, L. (2011). Lying: an experimental investigation of the role of situational factors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(04), 605–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, C., Thompson, J. A., Hoopes, J. L., & Rodrigo, P. (2010). Business ethics journal rankings as perceived by business ethics scholars. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, A. (2008). Experiments in ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. II (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arfaoui, F., Damak-Ayadi, S., Ghram, R., & Bouchekoua, A. (2016). Ethics education and accounting students’ level of moral development: experimental design in tunisian audit context. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2008). Judgment in managerial decision making. 8th Edition. NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beets, S. D., Lewis, B. R., & Brower, H. H. (2016). The quality of business ethics journals: an assessment based on application. Business & Society, 55(2), 188–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, A. (1990). How should psychologists define morality? Or, the negative side effects of philosophy’s influence on psychology. The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences, 38–70. Edited by Wren, Thomas E.. The MIT Press. Cambridge Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: the first 1500 articles published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business ethics, 26(1), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2004). Freedom evolves. Penguin London, UK.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1920; 2004). Reconstruction in philosophy. Mineola, NY. Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. NY: Penguin Random House LLC.Google Scholar
Ellertson, C. F., Ingerson, M. C., & Williams, R. N. (2016). Behavioral ethics: a critique and a proposal. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. (2014). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason and the gap between us and them. Penguin Books Ltd. New York.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (2015). What can philosophy contribute to ethics?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gromet, D. M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2014). Back into the fold: The influence of offender amends and victim forgiveness on peer reintegration. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(03), 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage. New York.Google Scholar
Harris, S. (2011). The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hayibor, S., & Collins, C. (2016). Motivators of mobilization. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(2), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biol, 13(3), e1002106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1978). 1739. A treatise of human nature. London: John Noon.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive-developmental approach. Moral development and behavior: theory, research, and social issues, 31–53. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lavelle, J. J., Folger, R., & Manegold, J. G. (2016). Delivering bad news: How procedural unfairness affects messengers’ distancing and refusals. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. S., & Kwak, D. H. (2016). Consumers’ responses to public figures’ transgression: Moral reasoning strategies and implications for endorsed brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomax, R. G., & Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2013). An introduction to statistical concepts. Routledge. NY.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mischel, W. (2014). The marshmallow test: understanding self-control and how to master it. NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Personality, identity, and character: explorations in moral psychology. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. (2004). Sentimental rules: on the natural foundations of moral judgment. NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, K., & Healy, C. (2016). Susceptibility to the ‘dark side’of goal-setting: does moral justification influence the effect of goals on unethical behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, R. (2014). Statistical errors. Nature, 506(7487), 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. R., & Hudson, G. E. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. NY: Routledge Classics.
Prinz, J. (2009). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: a review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rieber, R. W., & Robinson, D. K. (2001). Wilhelm Wundt in history: The making of a scientific psychology. NY: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, E. (2011, Oct 19). How Dropbox started As a minimal viable product. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2011/10/19/dropbox-minimal-viable-product/.
Rittenburg, T. L., Gladney, G. A., & Stephenson, T. (2016). The effects of euphemism usage in business contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumann, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Who accepts responsibility for their transgressions? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1598–1610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serenko, A., & Dohan, M. (2011). Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of artificial intelligence. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 629–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehu, E., Becker, J. U., Langmaack, A. C., & Clement, M. (2016). The brand personality of nonprofit organizations and the influence of monetary incentives. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2013), Life after p-hacking, in – Advances in Consumer Research 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). p-Curve and effect size: correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge. NY.Google Scholar
Suar, D., & Gochhayat, J. (2016). Influence of biological sex and gender roles on ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessman, L. (2014). Moral failure: On the impossible demands of morality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonner, A. (2016, Jun 11). Should Dropbox really be worth more than Box Inc.? Retrieved from www.fool.com/investing/2016/06/11/should-dropbox-really-be-worth-more-than-box-inc.aspx.
Warren, D. E., Gaspar, J. P., & Laufer, W. S. (2014). Is formal ethics training merely cosmetic? A study of ethics training and ethical organizational culture. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(01), 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L. P., Moberg, D., Englehardt, E., Pritchard, M., & Parmar, B. (2011). Social constructivism, mental models, and problems of obedience. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, A. C., & Derry, R. (1996). An evaluation of journal quality: The perspective of business ethics researchers. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(03), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z. X., & Ma, H. K. (2016). How can a deontological decision lead to moral behavior? The moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yam, K. C., & Reynolds, S. J. (2016). The effects of victim anonymity on unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2014). Morality rebooted: Exploring simple fixes to our moral bugs. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., and Anand, V., “The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 25 (2003), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, C. M., Schaubroeck, J., Huth, M., and Ghumman, S.. “Lack of Sleep and Unethical Conduct,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2) (2011), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C. B., Bohns, V. K., and Gino, F., “Good Lamps Are the Best Policez; Darkness Increases Dishonesty and Self-interested Behavior.” Psychological science, 21(3) (2010), 311–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funder, D. C., Levine, J. M., Mackie, D. M., Morf, C. C., Sansone, C., Vazire, S., and West, S. G.. “Improving the Dependability of Research in Personality and Social Psychology: Recommendations for Research and Educational Practice.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18 (2013), 3–12, 10.1177/1088868313507536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., and Salvador, R., ”How Low Does Ethical Leadership Flow? Test of a Trickle-down Model,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108 (2009), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D. M. and Fernandes, M. F., “The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research,” Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11) (1991), 805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, D., and Ordonez, L., “Conscience Without Cognition: The Effects of Subconscious Priming on Ethical Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 57(3) (2014), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F. and Pierce, L., “Robin Hood Under the Hood: Wealth-based Discrimination in Illicit Customer Help,” Organization Science, 21(6) (2010), 1176–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, J. A., and Flynn, F. J., “Full-cycle Micro-organizational Behavior Research,” Organization Science, 16(4) (2005), 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., and Treviño, L. K., “Bad Apples, Bad Cases, and Bad Barrels: Meta-analytic Evidence About Sources of Unethical Decisions at Work,” Journal of applied Psychology, 95(1) (2010), 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunderson, J. S., and Thompson, J. A., “The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1) (2009), 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. P., Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, (2007).Google Scholar
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C. B., and Galinsky, A. D., “The Smell of Virtue: Clean Scents Promote Reciprocity and Charity,” Psychological Science, 21(3) (2010), 381–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenhardt, K. M., “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4) (1989), 532–550.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K., “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person–situation Interactionist Model,” Academy of Management Review, 11(3) (1986), 601–617.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K., “Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-unethical Behavior in Organizations,” Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2) (1992), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., and Reynolds, S. J.. “Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review.” Journal of Management, 32(6) (2006): 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S., Bell, J., and Berger, M. T., Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers, new edn. (Altamira Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., “Full-cycle Social Psychology,” Bickman, L. ed. Applied Social Psychology Annual, Vol. 1, (2009), 21–47.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. I., “Crossroads: The Virtues of Closet Qualitative Research.” Organization Science, 8(1) (1997), 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackall, R., “Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 1(4) (1988), 598–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J., and De Dreu, C. K., “Justified Ethicality: Observing Desired Counterfactuals Modifies Ethical Perceptions and Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2) (2011), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S., “Emergence of Ethical Issues During Strategic Change Implementation,” Organization Science, 20(1) (2009), 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S., “The Role of Construction, Intuition, and Justification in Responding to Ethical Issues at Work: The Sensemaking-Intuition Model,” Academy of Management Review, 32(4) (2007), 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S., DeCelles, K. A., and Dutton, J. E., “It’s Not Easy Being Green: The Role of Self-Evaluations in Explaining Support of Environmental Issues,” Academy of Management Journal, 57(1) (2014), 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dholakia, U., “My Experience as an Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) Worker,” LinkedIn, 2016, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/my-experience-amazon-mechanical-turk-mturk-worker-utpal-dholakia.
Mischel, W. and Endler, N.S., (1977). Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977), pp. 333–352.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R. (1999). Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., and Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bränström, R., Duncan, L. G., and Moskowitz, J. T. (2011). The association between dispositional mindfulness, psychological well-being, and perceived health in a Swedish population-based sample. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., and Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39(4), 713–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, K., and Bechara, A. (2007). Decision making and free will: A neuroscience perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25(2), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. E., and D’Esposito, M. (2003). Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 415–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
Dane, E. (2011). 18 Capturing intuitions “in flight”: Observations from research on attention and mindfulness. Handbook of intuition research, 217.CrossRef
Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., and Kinzler, K. D. (2011). The developmental neuroscience of moral sensitivity. Emotion Review, 3(3), 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Quervain, D. J., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., and Schellhammer, M. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305(5688), 1254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, X., Tang, Y.-Y., Cao, C., Deng, Y., Wang, Y., Xin, X., and Posner, M. I. (2015). Short-term meditation modulates brain activity of insight evoked with solution cue. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(1), 43–49. www.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., and Rangel, A. (2011). Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice: recent advances. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S.. Maak, T., and Pless, N. M. (2014). Leader mindfulness and decision-making. In: Neider, Linda and Schriesheim, Chester (Eds.). Research in Management, Vol. 10: Authentic and ethical leadership, pp. 191–208, Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., and Yang, T. (2011). Mindfulness at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, D. J., Lyddy, C. J., Glomb, T. M., Bono, J. E., Brown, K. W., Duffy, M. K., … Lazar, S. W. (2015). Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 0149206315617003.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D. (2009). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th edn, pp. 987–999). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., and Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greeson, J. M. (2009). Mindfulness research update: 2008. Complementary Health Practice Review, 14(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heekeren, H. R., Wartenburger, I., Schmidt, H., Schwintowski, H. P., and Villringer, A. (2003). An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making. Neuroreport, 14(9), 1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heeren, A., Van Broeck, N., and Philippot, P. (2009). The effects of mindfulness on executive processes and autobiographical memory specificity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(5), 403–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., and Baumert, A. (2010). Immediate affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgement: An adaptation of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 24(3), 522–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., and Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, D. (1738). A treatise of human nature.
Jones, O. D., Marois, R., Farah, M. J., and Greely, H. T. (2013). Law and neuroscience. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(45), 17624–17630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: The program of the stress reduction clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center. New York: Delta.Google Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
Kable, J. W. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience toolkit for the neuroeconomist: a functional overview. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4(2), 63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karelaia, N., and Reb, J. (2014). Improving decision making through mindfulness. Working paper, INSEAD.
Khoury, B., Sharma, M., Rush, S. E., and Fournier, C. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(6), 519–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, U., Gu, X., Sharp, C., Hula, A., Fonagy, P., and Montague, P. R. (2016). Mindfulness training increases cooperative decision making in economic exchanges: Evidence from fMRI. NeuroImage, 138, 274–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., and Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is “neuromarketing”? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindebaum, D., and Zundel, M. (2013). Not quite a revolution: scrutinizing organizational neuroscience in leadership studies. Human Relations, 66(6), 857–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, M. A. (2008). The statistical analysis of fMRI data. Statistical Science, 23(4), 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencl, J., and May, D. R. (2009). The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourao-Miranda, J., Anjelo Andrejuolo, P., and Pessoa, L. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2730–2736.Google ScholarPubMed
Moore, A., and Malinowski, P. (2009). Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 176–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, D. C., Voegtlin, C., and Maak, T. (2016). Business ethics: the promise of neuroscience. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–19.
Roeser, R. W., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Jha, A., Cullen, M., Wallace, L., Wilensky, R., … Harrison, J. (2013). Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout: Results from two randomized, waitlist-control field trials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruedy, N. E., and Schweitzer, M. E. (2010). In the moment: The effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pless, N.M. and Maak, T. (2012). Levi Strauss & Co.: Addressing child labour in Bangladesh. In Mendenhall, M. E., Oddou, G. R. and Stahl, G. K. (Eds.) Readings and cases in international human resource management and organizational behavior. 5th ed., London, New York: Routledge, 446–459.Google Scholar
Pless, N. M., Sabatella, F. and Maak, T. (2017). Mindfulness, Reperceiving, and Ethical Decision Making: A Neurological Perspective. In Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making (pp. 1-20). Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Powell, T. C. (2011). Neurostrategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1484–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, C., Lee, N., and Butler, M. (2011). Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organization Science, 22(3), 804–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., and Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Jazaieri, H., and Goldin, P. R. (2012). Mindfulness-based stress reduction effects on moral reasoning and decision making. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(6), 504–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smallwood, J., and Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. New York: Garland, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, E. A., and Jha, A. P. (2009). Mind fitness and mental armor: enhancing performance and building warrior resilience. Joint Force Quarterly, 55, 144–151.Google Scholar
Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., and Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., and Fenters, V. (2016). The added value of neuroscience methods in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1094428116642013.CrossRef
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., Stikic, M., Berka, C., Balthazard, P. A., Richardson, T., Pless, N. M., and Maak, T. (2013). Emergent leadership and team engagement: an application of neuroscience technology and methods. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2013, p. 12966). Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., Stikic, M., Berka, C., and Korszen, S. (2015). Neuroscience and team processes. Organizational Neuroscience, 277–294.CrossRef
Andriani, P., Biotto, G., and Ghezzi, D. M. (2012). “The Emergence of Trust-Based Knowledge Ecosystems: The Case of illycaffè in Brazil. In Belussi, F. and Staber, U. H. (Eds.), Managing Networks of Creativity (pp. 191–211). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benner, Katie. 2014. “How LinkedIn Cracked the Chinese Market.” Bloomberg View. www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2014-1 Accessed July 10, 201
Bollier, D., Weiss, S., and Hanson, K. O. 1991. Aiming Higher. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
Clark, Che, Greniuk, Holly, Riherd, Jacob, Rome, Brendan and Jessica, YU. 2010. “The Great Fire Wall of China: Google’s Market Entry into China.” Forbes India.http://forbesindia.com/article/thunderbird/the-great-fire-wall-of-china-googles-market-entry-into-china/16472/1#ixzz4F1bCoZ8o Accessed July 22, 2016.
Columbia Accident Report. 2003. Report of Columbia Accident Investigation Board. www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html Accessed February 24, 2015.
Daniels, Norman. 1979. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.” Journal of Philosophy.76: 256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1996. Justice and Justification. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanaraj, C., Branzei, O., and Subramanian, S. (2011). Bayer CropScience in India (A): Value-Driven Strategy. Ivey Case Publishing, Case No. 9. Retrieved from www.iveycases.com/ProductView.aspx?id=45590. Accessed January 14, 2016.
GOOGLE. 2016. www.google.com/about/company/. Accessed July 12, 2016.
LinkedIn. 2016. www.linkedin.com/about-us. Accessed July 27, 2016.
Mozur, Paul and Goel, Vindu. 2014. To reach China, LinkedIn plays by local rules. New York Times. October 5. www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/technology/to-reach-china-linkedin-plays-by-local-rules.html Accessed July 14, 2016.
Pallardy, Richard. 2016. “Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill of 2010.” Encyclopedia Britannica. www.britannica.com/event/Deepwater-Horizon-oil-spill-of-2010 Accessed August 2, 2016.
Rawls, John. 1951. “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics.” Philosophical Review. 60: 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971; 1989. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press.Google Scholar
Rogers Commission Report. 1986. The Report of The Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Accident. www.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs. Accessed June 3, 2014.
Waddell, Kaveh. 2016. “Why Google Quit China and Why It’s Heading Back.” The Atlantic, January 19, 2016.
Werhane, Patricia H. 2004. “The Principle of Double Effect and Moral Risk: Some Case Studies of US Transnational Corporations,” in Responsibility in World Business: Managing Harmful Side-effects of Corporate Activity. ed. Bomann-Larsen, Lene and Wiggin, Oddny. New York and Japan: United Nations University Press, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
Woollaston, Victoria. 2013. “China lifts ban on Facebook – but only for people living in a 17 square mile area of Shanghai.” www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2431861/China-lifts-ban-Facebook–people-living-working-small-area-Shanghai.html September 23. Accessed July 27, 2015.
Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Treatise on the Virtues. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 3 vols. New York: Benziger Brothers, Inc., 1947.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Ostwald, Martin. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1962.Google Scholar
Arras, John D. “Common Law Morality.” Hastings Center Report, July/August (1990): 35–37.
Barnes, Louis B., Roland Christensen, C., and Hansen, Abby J.. Teaching and the Case Method: Texts, Cases, and Readings. 3rd ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L., ed. Case Studies in Business, Society, and Ethics 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Boeyink, David E. “Casuistry: A Case-Based Method for Journalists.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7, 2 (1992): 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkmann, Johannes and Ims, Knut J.. “A Conflict Case Approach to Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 53 (2004): 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, Rogene A. Fundamental Concepts and Problems in Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989.Google Scholar
Calkins, Martin. “Casuistry and the Business Case Method.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11, 2 (April 2001): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, Martin “How Casuistry and Virtue Ethics Might Break the Ideological Stalemate Troubling Agricultural Biotechnology.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12, 3 (July 2002): 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, Martin “Developing a Virtue-Imbued Casuistry for Business Ethics.” Vol. 42 Issues in Business Ethics. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanagh, Gerald F. American Business Values with International Perspectives. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Ciulla, Joanne B. “Casuistry and the Case for Business Ethics.” In Business as a Humanity, ed. Donaldson, Thomas J. and Edward Freeman, R., 167–183. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kari Gwen. “Casuistry and Computer Ethics.” Metaphilosophy 38, 4 (July 2007): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Melvin T. “The Genesis of the Case Method in Business Instruction.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P., 25–33. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
Culliton, James W. “Writing Business Cases.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P.. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. Business Ethics. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
Dewing, Arthur Stone. “An Introduction to the Use of Cases.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P., 1–5. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
Donahue, James A. “The Use of Virtue and Character in Applied Ethics.” Horizons 17 (1990): 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Werhane, Patricia H., eds. Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter F. “What is ‘business ethics’?” National Affairs 63 (Spring 1981): 18–36.Google Scholar
Hanson, K. O. and Weiss, S.. Merck & Co., Inc.: Addressing Third-World Needs. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Publishing, 1991, no. 9–991-021 to 024.Google Scholar
Hunter, Kathryn Montgomery. “A Science of Individuals: Medicine and Casuistry.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14, April (1989): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. Pragmatism and Four Essays from The Meaning of Truth, ed. Perry, Ralph Barton. Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. “Casuistry: Between Legal Concept and Social Praxis.” Islamic Law and Society 2, 2 (1995): 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. “Casuistry and Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine 7 (1986): 65–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonsen, Albert R. “Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine 12, December (1991): 295–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill, 2004. Accessed 30 August 2016. Internet. Available from http://philosophy.eserver.org/kant/metaphys-of-morals.txt.
Keenan, S. J., James, F. Virtues for Ordinary Christians. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, 1996.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Craig C. “Case Method.” In Mastering Management Education: Innovations in Teaching Effectiveness, ed. Vance, Charles M., 45–52. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc., 1993.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
McLaren, B.M. “Computational Models of Ethical Reasoning: Challenges, Initial Steps, and Future Directions.” Intelligent Systems, IEEE 21, 4 (July-August 2006): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Thomas F. “Creed, Cult, Code and Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 5, 6 (1986): 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1906.Google Scholar
Porter, Jean. The Recovery of Virtue: The Relevance of Aquinas For Christians. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reporter. “Miracle Worker.” Time, 2 November 1987, 78.
Rotch, William. Casewriting. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, 1992, no. UVA-G-0364.Google Scholar
Rotch, William “Casewriting Workshop Handout.” Charlottesville: Unpublished, 20 May 1996.
Statman, Daniel, ed. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. “Commentary on Analogical Reasoning.” Harvard Law Review 106, January (1993): 741–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, Tom. “Casuistry in Medical Ethics: Rehabilitated, or Repeat Offender?” Theoretical Medicine 15, March (1994): 5-20.
van der Burg, Wibren and van Willigenburg, Theo, eds. Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel G. “Some Lessons and Nonlessons of Casuist History.” In Business as a Humanity, ed. Donaldson, Thomas J. and Edward Freeman, R., 184–195. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4): 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ählström, J., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2008). The process of defining corporate social responsibility: A study of Swedish garment retailers’ responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17: 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bansal, P., & Song, H-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate responsibility from sustainability. Academy of Management Annals. 11(1): 105–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barter, N., & Bebbington, J. (2013). Actor-network theory: a briefing note and possibilities for social and environmental accounting research. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 33(1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, O. & Diedrich, A. (2011). Exercising social responsibility in downsizing: Enrolling and mobilizing actors at a Swedish high-tech company. Organization Studies, 32(7): 897–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bled, A. J. (2010). Technological choices in international environmental negotiations: an actor–network analysis. Business & Society, 49(4): 570–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, L. (2013). The Foetal Condition: A Sociology of Engendering and Abortion. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Briers, M., & Chua, W. F. (2001). The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(3): 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1995. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cabantous, L., & Gond, J. P. (2011). Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality’s éternel retour. Organization Science, 22(3): 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge: 196–223. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination: 132–161. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998a). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets: 1–58. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998b). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the markets: 244–269. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2009). Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3): 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologist help them to do so. In Knorr-Cetina, K. & Cicourel, A.V. (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro Sociologies: 277–303. Boston, MA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caron, M. A., & Turcotte, M. F. B. (2009). Path dependence and path creation: Framing the extra-financial information market for a sustainable trajectory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(2): 272–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Déjean, F, Gond, J.-P. & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57(6): 741–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar
El Abboubi, M., & Nicolopoulou, K. (2012). International social-related accountability standards: Using ANT towards a multi-stakeholder analysis. M@n@gement, 4(15): 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Füssel, L., & Georg, S. (2000). The institutionalization of environmental concerns: Making the environment perform. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(3): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., & Boxenbaum, E. (2013). The glocalization of responsible investment: Contextualization work in France and Québec. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4): 707–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews. 18(4): 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Igalens, J., & Brès, L. (2013). Rendre compte du social. L’art du compromis performatif. Revue Française de Gestion, 237: 201–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P. & Nyberg, D. (2017). Materializing power to recover corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies. 38(8), 1127–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 481–510.CrossRef
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, T., Sandström, J., & Helin, S. (2009). Corporate codes of ethics and the bending of moral space. Organization, 16(4), 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larssaether, S., & Nijhof, A. (2009). Moral landscapes: Understanding agency in corporate responsibility initiatives. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16: 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1986). The power of association. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? 264–280. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Bijker, W. E., Law, J. (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change: 225–258. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2006). Petites leçons de sociologie des sciences. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaïa. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. London: Polity Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1986). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. In Law, J. (ed), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?: 234–263. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of actor-network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4): 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds) Actor Network Theory and After: 1–14. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Law, J. (2008). On sociology and STS. Sociological Review, 56: 623–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligonie, M. (2016). Management Control for Sustainability. A Practice-based Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility, PhD dissertation, ESSEC Business School.Google Scholar
Ligonie, M. (2017). The “forced performativity” of a strategy concept: Exploring how shared value shaped a gambling company’s strategy. Long Range Planning. Published online. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.04.001CrossRef
MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing a theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Review of Sociology, 109(1):107–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malsch, B. (2013). Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(2), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marti, E. & Gond, J.-P. 2017. When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring the boundary conditions of performativity. Academy of Management Review. Published online. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2016.0071.CrossRef
Pasquero, J. (1996). Stakeholder theory as a constructivist paradigm. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society, 7: 1153–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, S. M., & Wickert, C. (2016). On the potential of progressive performativity: Definitional purity, re-engagement and empirical points of departure. Human Relations, 69(2): 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Grinsven, M., Heusinkveld, S. & Cornelissen, J. (2016). Translating management concepts: Towards a typology of alternative approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3): 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wæraas, A. & Nielsen, J. A. (2016). Translation theory ‘translated’: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3): 236–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, G., & Gond, J. P. (2017). Meat your enemy: Animal rights, alignment and radical change. Journal of Management Inquiry. 26(2): 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C, & Nyberg, D. (2014). Creative self-destruction: corporate responses to climate change as political myths. Environmental Politics, 23: 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar