Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-gfk6d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-05T04:59:07.669Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Part II - Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

While earlier research on second language learning may have distinguished language acquisition from language use (Krashen, 1982), more recent conceptualizations of second language learning have come to refer to the field of second language acquisition (SLA) as second language studies (e.g., Gass, Lee, & Roots, 2007) and second language development (e.g., Larsen-Freeman, 2018). In light of this conceptual shift, the focus has also expanded beyond the individual language learner, with the research lens turning towards the language teacher and the wider social ecology in which the learner is embedded. In tandem with the broadening of the field, there has been a marked increase in the volume of qualitative research published since Lazaraton’s (1995) earlier lament over the paucity of qualitative studies published in applied linguistics journals. While the distribution of qualitative research across international journals remains uneven (Benson et al., 2009), with some journals such as Applied Linguistics, The Modern Language Journal, System, and TESOL Quarterly being more open to the publication of qualitative research than others, the field of SLA has also witnessed a proliferation of handbook chapters on qualitative research (e.g., Benson, 2012; De Costa, Valmori, & Choi, 2017; Harklau, 2011; Lew, Yang, & Harklau, 2018) and books (e.g., Holliday, 2007; Mirhosseini, 2017b; Richards, 2003) that focus exclusively on qualitative research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abbuhl, R., & Mackey, A. (2017). Second language acquisition research methods. In King, K. A., Lai, Y., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 183193). New York: Springer.
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, C. (2017). Ethics in qualitative language education research. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 5973). New York: Springer.
Anderson-Gough, F., Edgeley, C., & Sharma, N. (2017). Qualitative data management and analysis software. In Hoque, Z., Parker, L. D., & Covaleski, M. A. (eds.), The Routledge companion to qualitative accounting research methods (pp. 405431). London, England: Routledge.
Atkinson, D. (ed.) (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Atkinson, D. (2014). Language learning in mindbodyworld: A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 47, 467483.
Baralt, M. (2012). Coding qualitative data. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 222244). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Barkhuizen, G. (2014). Research timeline: Narrative research in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 47(4), 450466.
Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Investigating language tutor social inclusion identities. The Modern Language Journal, 101(S1), 6175.
Benson, P. (2012). Qualitative methods: Overview. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 47734783). Oxford: Blackwell.
Benson, P. (2018). Narrative analysis. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 595613). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benson, P., Chik, A., Gao, X., Huang, J., & Wang, W. (2009). Qualitative research in 10 language teaching and learning journals, 1997–2006. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1),7990.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bloome, D. (2012). Classroom ethnography. In Grenfell, M., Bloome, D., Hardy, C., Pahl, K., Roswell, J., & Street, B. (eds.), Language, ethnography, and education: Bridging New Literacy Studies and Bourdieu (pp. 826). New York: Routledge.
Burns, A., & Edwards, E. (2016). Language teacher action research: Achiev-ing sustainability. English Language Teaching Journal, 70 (1), 615.
Burns, A., & McPherson, P. (2017). Action research as iterative design: Implications for English language education research. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 105120). New York: Springer.
Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 226244.
Canagarajah, S. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 258279.
Casanave, C. P. (2015). Case studies. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 119136). London: Bloomsbury.
Chapelle, C. A. & Duff, P. A. (eds.) (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 172178.
Choi, S., & Richards, K. (guest eds.) (2016). Innovation in research methods in applied linguistics [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics, 37(1).
Collins, L., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 133147.
Copland, F. (2018). Observation and fieldnotes. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 249268). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davis, K. A. (2012). Ethnographic approaches to second language acquisition research. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 18) (Oxford: Blackwell).
De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 413422.
De Costa, P. I. (2015a). Re-envisioning language anxiety in the globalized classroom through a social imaginary lens. Language Learning, 65(3), 504532.
De Costa, P. I. (2015b). Tracing reflexivity through a narrative and identity lens. In Cheung, Y. L., Said, S. B. & Park, K. (eds.), Advances and current trends in language teacher identity research (pp. 135147). New York: Routledge.
De Costa, P. I. (2016a). Scaling emotions and identification: Insights from a scholarship student. Linguistics and Education, 34, 2232.
De Costa, P. I. (ed.) (2016b). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York: Routledge.
De Costa, P. I., & Canagarajah, S. (guest eds.) (2016). Scalar approaches to language teaching and learning [Special issue]. Linguistics and Education, 34.
De Costa, P. I., & Norton, B. (guest eds.) (2017). Transdisciplinarity and language teacher identity [Special issue]. The Modern Language Journal, 101(S).
De Costa, P. I., Rawal, H., & Li, W. (2018). L2 teachers’ emotions: A sociopolitical and ideological perspective. In de Dios Martínez Agudo, J. (ed.), Emotions in second language teaching (pp. 91108). New York: Springer.
De Costa, P. I., Rawal, H., & Zaykovskaya, I. (guest eds.) (2017). Study abroad in contemporary times: Toward greater methodological diversity and innovation [Special issue]. System, 71.
De Costa, P. I., Tigchelaar, M., & Cui, Y. (2016). Reflexivity, emotions and transnational habitus: The case of a “poor” cosmopolitan Chinese international student. AILA Review, 29, 173198.
De Costa, P. I., Valmori, L., & Choi, I. (2017). Qualitative research methods. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 522540). New York: Routledge.
Diao, W. (2017). Between the standard and non-standard: Accent and identity among transnational Mandarin speakers studying abroad in China. System, 71, 87101.
Dillon, D. R. (2012). Grounded theory and qualitative research. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 1947.
Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference. An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289322.
Duff, P. A. (2007). Qualitative approaches to second language classroom research. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (eds.), Handbook of English language teaching (pp. 973986). New York: Springer.
Duff, P. A. (2012). How to carry out case study research. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 95116). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Duff, P. A. (2014). Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 233255.
Duff, P. A. (2015). Transnationalism, multilingualism, and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 5780.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285300.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1998). SLA property: No trespassing! The Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 9194.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2006). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(S1), 800819.
Friedman, D. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 180200). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Galloway, N. (2017). Researching your own students: Negotiating the dual practitioner-researcher role. In McKinley, J. & Rose, H. (eds.), Doing research in applied linguistics: Realities, dilemmas, and solutions (pp. 146156). New York: Routledge.
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing global Englishes. New York: Routledge.
Gao, X. (2017). Dealing with criticism when publishing qualitative research. In McKinley, J. & Rose, H. (eds.), Doing research in applied linguistics: Realities, dilemmas, and solutions (pp. 225234). New York: Routledge.
García, O., Ibarra Johnson, S., & Seltzer, K. (2016). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
Garrett, P. B. (2017). Researching language socialization. In King, K. A., Lai, Y.-J., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 283295). New York: Springer International Publishing.
Gass, S. M., Lee, J., & Roots, R. (2007). Firth and Wagner: New ideas or a new articulation? The Modern Language Journal, 91, 788799.
Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 247271.
Gonulal, T., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2017). The development of statistical literacy in applied linguistics graduate students. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 432.
Hadley, G. (2015). English for academic purposes in neoliberal universities: A critical grounded theory. New York: Springer.
Hadley, G. (2017). Grounded theory in applied linguistics research. New York: Routledge.
Hanauer, D. I. (2012). Meaningful literacy: Writing poetry in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 45(1), 105115.
Harklau, L. (2011). Approaches and methods in recent qualitative research. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 175189). New York: Routledge.
Hawkins, M. R. (ed.) (2011). Social justice language teacher education. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Hellermann, J. (2011). Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In Doehler, S. P., Hellermann, J. H., & Hall, J. K. (eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 147172). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2017). Interactional approaches to the study of classroom discourse and student learning. In King, K. A., Lai, Y., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 297309). New York: Springer.
Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N. C., & Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 361421.
Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 7394.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2016). Mindful L2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers’ professional development. New York: Routledge.
Kanno, Y., & Harklau, L. (eds.) (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. New York: Routledge.
Kasper, G., & Prior, M. (2015). Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 226255.
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In Atkinson, D. (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117142). New York: Routledge.
King, K. A., & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 209227.
Kramsch, C. (2015). Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465.
Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2007). Three fundamental concepts in second language acquisition and their relevance in multilingual contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 907922.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
Kubanyiova, M. (2009). Possible selves in language teacher development. In Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 314332). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Kubanyiova, M. (2015). The role of teachers’ future self-guides in creating L2 development opportunities in teacher-led classroom discourse: Reclaiming the relevance of language teacher cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 565584.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Second language acquisition, WE and language as a complex adaptive system (CAS). World Englishes, 37(1), 8092.
Lau, S. M. C. (2017). Classroom ethnography on critical language and literacy teaching and learning. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 7790). New York: Springer.
Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 455–472.
Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 6284.
Lew, S., Yang, A. H., & Harklau, L. (2018). Qualitative methodology. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 79101). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 930.
Li, W., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Professional survival in a neoliberal age: A case study of an EFL teacher in China. Asia TEFL Journal, 14(2), 277291.
Li, W., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Exploring novice EFL teachers’ identity development: A case study of two EFL teachers in China. In Mercer, S. & Koustoulas, A. (eds.), Teacher psychology in SLA (pp. 86104). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Luk, J. C. M. (2017). Classroom discourse and the construction of learner and teacher identities. In Wortham, S., Kim, D., & May, S. (eds.), Discourse and education (pp. 173184). New York: Springer.
Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., Jones, R. H., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). TESOL Quarterly research guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 4265.
Maloney, J., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Imagining the Japanese heritage learner: A scalar perspective. Language, Discourse, & Society, 9(1), 3552.
Mangual Figueroa, A., & Baquedano-López, P. (2017). Language socialization and schooling. In Duff, P. A. & May, S. (eds.), Language socialization (pp. 113). New York: Springer.
Manosuthikit, A., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). Ideologizing age in an era of superdiversity: A heritage language practice perspective. Applied Linguistics Review, 7(1), 125.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954969.
McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Miller, E. R. (2018). Interaction analysis. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 615639). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mirhosseini, S.-A. (2017a). Introduction: Qualitative research in language and literacy education. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (Vol. 29, pp. 113). New York: Springer.
Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.) (2017b). Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education. New York: Springer.
Norris, S. (2014). The impact of literacy-based schooling on learning a creative practice: Modal configurations, practices and discourses. Multimodal Communication, 3(2), 181195.
Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity and language education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 90112.
Ohta, A. S. (2017). Sociocultural theory and second/foreign language education. In Van Deusen-Scholl, N. & May, S. (eds.), Second and foreign language education (pp. 5768). New York: Springer.
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427443.
Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (2015). Approaches and methods in applied linguistics research. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 525). London: Bloomsbury.
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paulus, T. M., Jackson, K., & Davidson, J. (2017). Digital tools for qualitative research: Disruptions and entanglements. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 751756.
Pirini, J., Matelau-Doherty, T., & Norris, S. (2018). Multimodal analysis. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 639658). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Prior, M. T. (2018). Interview and focus group research. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research (pp. 225248). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Riazi, A. M. (2017). Mixed methods research in language teaching and learning. Sheffield: Equinox.
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42(2), 147180.
Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2017). The prevalence of pedagogy-related research in applied linguistics: Extending the debate. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 599604.
Sayer, P. (2013). Translanguaging, TexMex, and bilingual pedagogy: Emergent bilinguals learning through the vernacular. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 6388.
Smotrova, T., & Lantolf, J. (2013). The function of gesture in lexically focused L2 instructional conversations. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 397416.
Starfield, S. (2015). Ethnographic research. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 137152). London: Bloomsbury.
Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System, 70, 5062.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Subtirelu, N. C., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Working across methodological paradigms: Mixed methods research in applied linguistics. Workshop presented at Second Language Research Forum, Columbus, OH.
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–33.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2017). Classroom discourse: Theoretical orientations and research approaches. In Cenoz, J., Gorter, D., & May, S. (eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism (pp. 187203). New York: Springer.
Valmori, L., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). How do foreign language teachers maintain their proficiency? A grounded theory approach. System, 57, 98108.
Van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2015). Key terms in second language acquisition. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walqui, A., & van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
Wargo, J. M., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Tracing academic literacies across contemporary literacy sponsorscapes: Mobilities, ideologies, identities, and technologies. London Review of Education, 15(1), 101114.
Waring, H. Z. (2017). Conversation analytic approaches to language and education. In King, K. A., Lai, Y.-J., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 463474). New York: Springer.
Warriner, D., & Anderson, K. T. (2017). Discourse analysis in educational research. In King, K. A., Lai, Y.-J., & May, S. (eds.), Research methods in language and education (pp. 297309). New York: Springer.
Winke, P. (2017). Using focus groups to investigate study abroad theories and practice. System, 71, 7383.
Wolff, D., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Expanding the language teacher identity landscape: An investigation of the emotions and strategies of a NNEST. The Modern Language Journal, 101(S1), 7690.
Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242259.
Zappa-Holman, S., & Duff, P. A. (2015). Academic English socialization through individual networks of practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 339368.
Zaykovskaya, I., Rawal, H., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Learner beliefs for successful study abroad experience: A case study. System, 71, 113121.

References

Asher, J. J. (1972). Children’s first language as a model for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 56, 133139.
Aubrey, S. (2017a). Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: Learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 661692.
Aubrey, S. (2017b). Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 717734.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E. (2015). The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 324350.
Barkaoui, K. (2010). Explaining ESL essay holistic scores: A multilevel modeling approach. Language Testing, 27, 515535.
Barkaoui, K. (2014). Quantitative approaches for analyzing longitudinal data in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 65101.
Beretta, A. (1986). Program-fair language teaching evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 431444.
Boers, F., Dang, T. C. T., & Strong, B. (2017). Comparing the effectiveness of phrase-focused exercises: A partial replication of Boers, Demecheleer, Coxhead, and Webb (2014). Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 362380.
Brown, J. (2014). Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 822.
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, L., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 133147.
De Costa, P., Valmori, L., & Choi, I. (2017). Qualitative research methods. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 541561). New York: Routledge.
De Silva, R. (2015). Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 301323.
Dolean, D. D. (2016). The effects of teaching songs during foreign language classes on students’ foreign language anxiety. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 638653.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 1947.
Farley, A. P., Ramonda, K., & Liu, X. (2012). The concreteness effect and the bilingual lexicon: The impact of visual stimuli attachment on meaning recall of abstract L2 words. Language Teaching Research, 16(4), 449466.
Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 115142.
Gass, S. (2015). Experimental research. In Paltridge, B. & Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 101118). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575611.
Gass, S., & Sterling, S. (2017). Ethics in ISLA. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 577595). New York: Routledge.
Gilmore, A. (2008). Getting real in the language classroom: Developing Japanese students’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Nottingham University.
Gilmore, A. (2011). “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786819.
Hamada, Y. (2016). Shadowing: Who benefits and how? Uncovering a booming EFL teaching technique for listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 3552.
Hashemi, M. R. (2012). Reflections on mixing methods in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 33, 206212.
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 828852.
Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 7088.
Hung, H. T. (2017). Design-based research: Redesign of an English language course using a flipped classroom approach. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 180192.
Jang, E. E., Wagner, M., & Park, G. (2014). Mixed methods research in language testing and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 123153.
Karimi, M. N. (2015). EFL learners’ multiple documents literacy: Effects of a strategy-directed intervention program. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 4056.
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014a). Learners’ beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 86109.
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014b). The noticeability and effectiveness of corrective feedback in relation to target type. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 428452.
Kim, Y. (2013). Effects of pretask modeling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 835.
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656677.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200213.
Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2015). Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 687711.
Li, Q. (2012). Effects of instruction on adolescent beginners’ acquisition of request modification. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 3055.
Lin, M. H. (2016). Effects of corpus-aided language learning in the EFL grammar classroom: A case study of students’ learning attitudes and teachers’ perceptions in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 871893.
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1980). Inside the “black box”: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30(1), 142.
Luke, D. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mackey, A. (2017). Classroom-based research. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 541561). New York: Routledge.
Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., …, De Costa, P. I. (2016). TESOL Quarterly research guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 4265.
Moranski, K., & Kim, F. (2016). “Flipping” lessons in a multi-section Spanish course: Implications for assigning explicit grammar instruction outside of the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 830852.
Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 930.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 6789.
Rassaei, E. (2015). Recasts, field dependence/independence cognitive style, and L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 499518.
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47, 135173.
Saito, Y., & Saito, K. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 589608.
Sato, E., Chen, J. C. C., & Jourdain, S. (2017). Integrating digital technology in an intensive, fully online college course for Japanese beginning learners: A standards-based, performance-driven approach. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 756775.
Scherer, G. A. C., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 89106.
Short, D. J., Fidelman, C. G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in English language learners through sheltered instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 334361.
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63(1), 121159.
Spada, N., Jessop, L., Tomita, Y., Suzuki, W., & Valeo, A. (2014). Isolated and integrated form-focused instruction: Effects on different types of L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 453473.
Spinner, P., Gass, S. M., & Behney, J. (2013). Ecological validity in eye-tracking: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 389415.
Sun, C. H. (2017). The value of picture-book reading-based collaborative output activities for vocabulary retention. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 96117.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 447471.
Tian, L., & Macaro, E. (2012). Comparing the effect of teacher codeswitching with English-only explanations on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university students: A lexical focus-on-form study. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 367391.
Tomita, Y., & Spada, N. (2013). Form-focused instruction and learner investment in L2 communication. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 591610.
Wegener, D., & Blankenship, K. (2007). Ecological validity. In Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 275276). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Xu, Y., Chang, L. Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). The effect of radical-based grouping in character learning in Chinese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 773793.
Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111133.
Yeldham, M. (2016). Second language listening instruction: Comparing a strategies-based approach with an interactive, strategies/bottom-up skills approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 394420.

References

Alexander, L., & Onslow-Mato, W. (2015). Students as active protagonists in the reading process: Developing tasks for critical reading in the EAP classroom. Research Notes, 60, 3037.
Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 24(2), 6181.
Allwright, D. (1997). Quality and sustainability in teacher-research. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 368370.
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Al-Maskari, A. S. (2015). Suppporting teacher research through a practical in-service course. In Borg, S. & Santiago-Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 113124). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139147.
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Identity of the teacher-researcher in collaborative action research: Concerns reflected in a research journal. PROFILE, Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 2943.
Banegas, D. L., Pavese, A., Velázquez, A., & Vélez, S. M. (2013). Teacher professional development through collaborative action research: Impact on foreign English-language teaching and learning. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 185201.
Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Reflections on language teacher identity research. New York: Routledge.
Beasley, B., & Riordan, L. (1981). The classroom teacher as researcher. English in Australia, 55(1), 3642.
Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borg, S. (2015). Professional development through the Cambridge English/English UK Action Research Scheme. Research Notes, 61, 35.
Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). TESOL research: What? How? Why? Pre-convention event, 2 April, 42nd Annual Convention, New York.
Borg, S., & Lui, Y. (2013). Chinese English college teachers’ engagement with research. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270299.
Breen, M., Candlin, C., Dam, L., & Gabrielsen, G. (1989). The evolution of a teacher training program. In Johnson, K. (ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 111135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brindley, G. (1990). Towards a research agenda for TESOL. Prospect, 6(1), 726.
Brumfit, C., & Mitchell, R. (1989). The language classroom as a focus for research. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), Research in the language classroom (pp. 315). London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.
Bullock, D., & Smith, R. (eds.) (2015). Teachers research! Faversham: IATEFL.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2000). Facilitating collaborative action research: Some insights from the AMEP. Prospect, 15(3), 2334.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
Burns, A. (2011). Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 237253). New York: Routledge.
Burns, A. (2016). From reluctant teacher to teacher educator: A “brilliant” career. In Ellis, R. (ed.), Being and becoming an applied linguist (pp. 301330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Burns, A. (2017). “This life-changing experience”: Teachers becoming action researchers. In Barkhuizen, G. (ed.), Reflections on language teacher identity research (pp. 133138). New York: Routledge.
Burns, A., & Brandon, K. (2017). Action research in ELICOS. Impact and insights from a national teacher development program. In Burns, A. & Khalifa, H. (Eds.), Second language assessment and action research (pp. 315327). SiLT Series. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A., Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Wyatt, M. (eds.) (2017). Developing insights into teacher-research. Faversham: IATEFL. Retrieved from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/burns_dikilitas_smith___wyatt_eds._2017.pdf.
Burns, A., & Kurtoglu-Hooton, M. (2016). Using action research to explore technology: International perspectives. London: The British Council.
Burns, A., & Khalifa, H. (eds.) (2017). Second language assessment and action research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A., & McPherson, P. (2017). Action research as iterative design: Implications for English language education research. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 105120). New York: Springer.
Burns, A., Westmacott, A., & Hidalgo Ferrer, A. (2016). Initiating an action research programme for university EFL teachers: Early experiences and responses. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 5573.
Castellano, J., Mynard, J., & Rubesch, T. (2011). Action research: Student technology use in a self-access center. Language Learning and Technology, 15(3), 1227.
Çelik, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). Action research as a professional development strategy. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 125138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Corey, S. M. (1954). Action research in education. Journal of Educational Research, 47(5), 375380,
Cárdenas, M. L. (2003). Teacher researchers as writers: A way to sharing findings. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 5(5), 4964.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Castro Garcés, A. Y., & Martínez Granada, L. (2016). The role of collaborative action research in teachers’ professional development. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 3954.
Chan, C. (2016). School–university partnerships in English language teacher education. Tensions, complexities and the politics of collaboration. New York: Springer.
Clark, M. A. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 926.
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for English language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 130144.
Crookes, G., & Chandler, P. M. (2001). Introducing action research into the education of postsecondary foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 131140.
Dajani, M. (2015). Preparing Palestinian reflective English language teachers through classroom-based action research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 116139.
Dikilitaş, K., & Griffiths, C. (2017). Developing language teacher autonomy through action research. New York: Springer.
Dikilitaş, K., & Mumford, S. E. (2016). Supporting the writing up of teacher research: peer and mentor roles. ELT Journal, 70(4), 371381.
Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Trotman, W. (eds.) (2015). Teacher-researchers in action. Faversham: IATEFL. Retrieved from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/teacher-researchers_in_action.pdf.
Dikilitaş, K., Wyatt, M., Hanks, J., & Bullock, D. (eds.) (2016). Teachers engaging in research. Faversham: IATEFL. Downloadable from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/teachers_engaging_in_research.pdf.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edge, J., & Richards, K. (eds.) (1994). Teachers develop teachers research. London: Heinemann.
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016a). Language teacher action research: Achieving sustainablity: ELT Journal, 70(1), 615.
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016b). Language teacher-researcher identity negotiation: An ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 735745.
Esposito, J., & Smith, S. (2006). From reluctant teacher to empowered teacher-researcher. One educator’s journey towards action research. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 4560.
Fanselow, J. (1987). Breaking rules: Generating and exploring alternatives in language teaching. New York: Longman.
Field, J., Graham, A., Griffiths, E., & Head, K. (eds.) (1997), Teachers develop teachers research 2. Whitstable: IATEFL.
Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (eds.) (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hei, K. C., & David, M. K. (2017). Empowering language teachers through action research: Two case studies from Malaysia. English Review: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 163174.
Hine, G. S. C. (guest ed.) (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs [Special issue]. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2).
Holliday, A. (2001). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.
Kutlay, N. (2013). A survey of English language teachers’ views of research. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 188206.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics, ed. Lewin, G. W.. New York: Harper & Row.
Mangion, L., & Stokes, P. (2017). Using cloud computing to increase collaboration in developing writing skills. Research Notes, 67, 712,
McKay, S. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McFarland, K. P., & Stansell, J. C. (1993). Historical perspectives. In Patterson, L., Santa, C. M., Short, C. G., & Smith, K. (eds.), Teachers are researchers: Reflection and action (pp. 1218). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Mathew, R., Eapen, R. L., & Tharu, J. (eds.) (2000). The language currriculum: Dynamics of change, Vol. 1. The outsider perspective. Report of the International Seminar 1995. Hyderabad: Orient Longman for the Central Institute for English and Foreign Language Studies.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for language teachers. London, England: Arnold.
McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 3347.
McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. New York: Routledge.
McKay, S. L. (2009). Second language classroom research. In Burns, A. & Richards, J. C. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 281288). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mehrani, M. B. (2016). A narrative study of Iranian EFL teachers’ experiences of doing action research. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 93112.
MEST (2016). The National Curriculum Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Mok, A. (1997). Student empowerment in an English language enrichment programme: An action research project in Hong Kong. Educational Action Research, 5(2), 305320.
NCTE (2009). National curriculum framework for teacher education. New Delhi: National Council for Teacher Education.
Negi, J. S. (2016). Improving teaching through action research; Perceptions, practices and problems (3Ps): Voices from secondary level teachers in an EFL context. ELT Voices, 6(4), 1830.
NFL2020 (2014). Competency framework for English language teachers. Hanoi: Ministry of Education.
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow: Longman and Pearson Education.
Nunan, D. C. (1987). The teacher as curriculum developer. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
Nunan, D. C. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. A guide for teacher-initiated action. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
O’Brien, T., Newnham, G., & Tinker, L. (2000). Collaborative practice-based research in supporting the language development of primary level bilingual children: A case study. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 4364.
Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (eds.) (2015). Research methods in applied linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
Perrett, G. (2003). Teacher development through action research: A case study in focused action research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 110.
Pickering, G., & Gunashekar, P. (eds.) (2015). Innovation in language teacher education. London: The British Council.
Rainey, I. (2000). Action research and the English as a foreign language practitioner: Time to take stock. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 6591.
Rajuan, M. (2015). Practice and principles of pre-service action research. In Borg, S. & Santiago-Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 139151). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ramani, W. (1987). Theorizing from the classroom. ELT Journal, 41(1), 311.
Rebolledo, P., Smith, R., & Bullock, D. (eds.) (n.d.). Champion teachers: Stories of exploratory action research. London: The British Council.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies. New York: Routledge.
Roberts, J. (1986). Action research: An introduction. Teacher Development SIG Newsletter, No. 4. Faversham: IATEFL.
Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London: Arnold.
Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 521.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
TESOL (2004). TESOL 2004 Annual Report. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/docs/annual-reports/arp2004.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
Tinker Sachs, G. (ed.) (2002), Action research in English language teaching. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Tran, A., Burns, A., & Ollerhead, S. (2017). ELT lecturers’ experiences of a new research policy: Exploring emotion and academic identity, System, 67, 6576.
Trent, J. (2010). Teacher education as identity construction: Insights from action research. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 36(2), 153168.
van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
van Lier, L. (1994). Action research. Sintagma, 6, 3137.
Viera, F. (2003). Addressing constraints on autonomy in school contexts: Lessons from working with teachers. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 220239). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vilches, J. U. (2007). Teacher autonomy: A critical review of the research and concept beyond applied linguistics. Í kala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 12(18), 245275.
Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, M. (1998). Action research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Promoting teacher autonomy through university–school collaborative research. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 222–241.
Wyatt, M. (2010). Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal, 65(4), 417425.
Wyatt, M., Burns, A., & Hanks, J. (2016). Teacher practitioner research: Reflections on an online discussion. TESL-EJ, 20(1), 122.
Xie, J. (2015). Learning to do teacher research independently: Challenges and solutions. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 4756). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242259.
Yoshida, T., & Kambara, K. (2014). EFL teachers’ conceptual development and the transformation of teaching through narratives in the E-portfolio. In Said, B. S. & Zhang, L. (eds.), Language teachers and teaching: Global perspectives, local initiatives (pp. 219236). New York: Routledge.
Yuan, R. E., & Lee, I. (2015). Action research facilitated by university–school collaboration. ELT Journal, 69(1),110.
Yuan, R. E., & Burns, A. (2016). Teacher identity development through action research: A Chinese experience. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(6), 729749.
Yucel, M., & Bos, V. (2015). Action research as a means of stepping out of the teaching comfort zone. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 2946). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yucel, B., & Gűndoğdu, M. A. (2017). Mentoring teachers as researchers. In Burns, A., Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Wyatt, M. (eds.), Developing insights into teacher research (p. 2938). Faversham: IATEFL.

References

Allen, J. P. B., & Carroll, S. (1987). Evaluation of classroom processes in a Canadian core French programme. Evaluation & Research in Education, 1, 4961.
Allen, J. P. B., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of second language teaching: An observation scheme. In Handscombe, J., Orem, R., & Taylor, B. (eds.), On TESOL ’83 (pp. 232252). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543574.
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom, Language Awareness, 11, 113.
Bellack, A., Herbert, A., Kliebard, M., & Smith, F. L. Jr. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Beretta, A., & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39, 121127.
Borg, S. (1998). Teachers’ pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 938.
Brock, C. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 4759.
Chaudron, C. (1988a). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chaudron, C. (1988b). Classroom research: Recent methods and research findings. In Kasper, G. (ed.), AILA review: Classroom research (Vol. 5, pp. 1019). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chaudron, C. (1991). Validation in second language classroom research and the evaluation of teaching methods. In Phillipson, R., Kellerman, E., Selinker, L., Sharwood Smith, M., & Swain, M. (eds.), Foreign language pedagogy: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 187196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 22, 289322.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Fanselow, J. (1977). Beyond “Rashomon”—Conceptualizing and describing the teaching act. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 1739.
Fazio, L., & Lyster, R. (1998). Immersion and submersion classrooms: A comparison of instructional practices in language arts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19, 303317.
Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Fröhlich, M., Spada, N., & Allen, P. (1985). Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 2757.
Guilloteaux, M., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 5577.
Harklau, L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 241–272.
Kim, S., & Elder, C. (2005). Language choices and pedagogic functions in the foreign language classroom: A cross-linguistic functional analysis of teacher talk. Language Teaching Research, 9, 335380.
Lee, Y. (2006). Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 691713.
Levin, L. 1972. Comparative studies in foreign-language teaching. Stockholm: Almquist och Wiksell.
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309365.
Lightbown, P., Halter, R., White, J., & Horst, M. (2002). Comprehension-based learning: The limits of “do it yourself”. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 58, 427–464.
Long, M. (1980). Inside the “black box”: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 142.
Long, M., & Sato, C. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In Davies, A., Criper, C., & Howatt, A. (eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253280). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269300.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 3766.
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265302.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 140.
Macaro, E. (2001). Analysing student teachers codeswitching in foreign language classrooms: Theories and decision making. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 531548.
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction and second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Markee, N. (2005). Conversation analysis for second language acquisition. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 355374). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McCormick, D., & Donato, R. (2000). Teacher questions as scaffolding assistance in an ESL classroom. In Hall, J. & Verplaetse, L. (eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 183201). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McKay, S. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McNeil, L. (2012). Using talk to scaffold referential questions for English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 396404.
Mitchell, R. (1985a) Communicative interaction research project: Final report. Stirling: Department of Education, University of Stirling.
Mitchell, R. (1985b) Process research in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 18, 330352.
Mitchell, R., Parkinson, B., & Johnstone, R. (1981). The foreign language classroom an observational study. Stirling: University of Stirling.
Moskowitz, G. (1976). The FLINT system: An observational tool for the foreign language classroom. In Simon, A. & Boyer, E. (eds.), Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (pp. 125157). Philadelphia, PA: Center for the Study of Teaching at Temple University.
Nunan, D. (2005). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1987) Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41, 136145.
Polio, C., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Teachers’ language use in university foreign language classrooms: A qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 313326.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). Corrective feedback makes a difference: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Savignon, S. (1972). Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.
Scherer, A., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGrawHill.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2010). The incidental acquisition of plural -s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 607637.
Simard, D., & Jean, G. (2011). Exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions. Language Learning, 61, 759785.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, P. (1970). A comparison of the audiolingual and cognitive approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pennsylvania foreign language project. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.
Spada, N. (1987). Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 131161.
Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT. Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme. Sydney: National Center of English Language Teaching and Research.
Spada, N., & Lyster, R. (1997). Microscopic and macroscopic views of second language classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 787795.
Ullman, R., & Geva, E. (1985). Expanding our evaluation perspective: What can classroom observation tell us about Core French programs? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 42, 307323.
Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (1988). Ethnography in ELS: Defining the essentials. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 575592.

References

Alemán Bañón, J., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A. (2012). The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 4963.
Altmann, G. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137, 190200.
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 137153.
Caffarra, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 51, 3147.
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject–verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10, 161174.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564570.
Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 659678.
Davidson, D., & Indefrey, P. (2011). Error-related activity and correlates of grammatical plasticity. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 219.
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R. (2008). Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologia, 128, 501513.
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353387.
Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drighe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 663679.
Ellert, M. (2011). Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution in L1 and L2 German and Dutch. Unpublished PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141172.
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2011). Processing reflexives in English as a second language: The role of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 571603.
Felser, C., Sato, M., & Bertenshaw, N. (2009). The online application of binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 485502.
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012a). Can late L2 learners acquire grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226248.
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012b). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1-L2 syntactic similarity: Erratum. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 202.
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213247.
Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21, 175198.
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119148.
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 13571392.
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 12191248.
Friederici, A., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 529534.
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 2139.
Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243268.
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191215.
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A. J. (2014). The role of discourse-level expectations in nonnative speakers’ referential choices. In Orman, W. and Valleau, M. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, BUCLD 38 (pp. 179191). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Resesarch, 28, 715728.
Hagoort, P., & Indefrey, P. (2014). The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37, 347362.
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123141.
Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S. (2003). Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In Hout, R., Hulk, A., Kuiken, F., & Towell, R. (eds.), The lexicon–syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 2144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hernandez, A. E., Hofmann, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Age of acquisition modulates neural activity for both regular and irregular syntactic functions. NeuroImage, 36(3), 912923.
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflectional morphology: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901931.
Hopp, H. (2013). Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 277306.
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603634.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483516.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language processing research. Language Learning, 46, 286324.
Juffs, A., & Rodriguez, G. A. (2014). Second language sentence processing. New York: Routledge.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228238.
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive processing in L1 and L2. What’s different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257282.
Keating, G. D. (2009). Sensitivity to violations in gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59(3), 503535.
Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., Van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85, 136.
Kotz, S. A., Holcomb, P., & Osterhout, L. (2008). ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in early bilinguals and monolinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128, 514527.
Lee, M. W. E. (2002). Implementing subject–verb number agreement in a non-native language. Poster presented at the 15th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 447464.
Liversedge, S., Paterson, K., & Pickering, M. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In Underwood, G. (ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 5575). Oxford: Elsevier.
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97115.
Martin, C., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574588.
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkanen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., & Osterhout, L. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60(S2), 123150.
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., Caffarra, S., & Carreiras, M. (2015). On the left anterior negativity (LAN): The case of morphosyntactic agreement: A reply to Tanner et al. Cortex, 66, 156159.
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47, 908930.
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60, 154193.
Nevins, A., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., & Phillips, C. (2007). The role of feature number and feature type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations. Brain Research, 1164, 8194.
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 12121228.
O’Rourke, P. L., & Van Petten, C. (2011). Morphological agreement at a distance: Dissociation between early and late components of the event related brain potential. Brain Research, 1392, 6279.
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., & Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second-language processing. Language Learning, 56(1), 199230.
Paterson, K., Liversedge, S., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of short relative clause sentences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 717737.
Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 940961.
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103133.
Proverbio, A. M., Cok, B., & Zani, A. (2002). Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 9941017.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372422.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 14571506.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358374.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S., Morris, R., Schmauder, A., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and online language comprehension processes. Language and Cognition Processes, 4, 2149.
Roberts, L. (2013). Sentence processing in bilinguals. In van Gompel, R. (ed.), Sentence processing. Current issues in the psychology of language (pp. 221246). Hove: Psychology Press.
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 299331.
Roberts, L., González Alonso, J., Pliatsikas, C., & Rothman, J. (2018). Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications? Second Language Research, 34, 125143.
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333357.
Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations online in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29, 413439.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M. P., & Kotz, S. A. (2016). What does neuroimaging tell us about morphosyntactic processing in the brain of second language learners? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 665973.
Rossi, S., Gugler, M., Friederici, A., & Hahne, A. (2002). The impact of proficiency on second language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 20302048.
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(12), 20302048.
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Fiebach, C. J., Kempe, V., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Processing lexical semantic and syntactic information in first and second language: fMRI evidence from German and Russian. Human Brain Mapping, 25(2), 266286.
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Zysset, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Native and non-native reading of sentences: An fMRI experiment. NeuroImage, 31(1), 354365.
Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. A. (2008). Neurobiology of Language Learning. In Hult, F. M. & Spolsky, B. (eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 2737). Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L. A., & de Haan, G. J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22, 129.
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2011). Proficiency and animacy effects on L2 gender agreement processes during comprehension. Language Learning, 61(1), 80116.
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, X. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 4072.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 10(3), 209231.
Slabakova, R. (guest ed.) (2009). The Fundamental Difference Hypothesis twenty years later [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2.
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 133.
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195210.
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25(1), 1341.
Suh, S., Yoon, H. W., Lee, S., Chung, J.-Y., Cho, Z.-H., & Park, H. (2007). Effects of syntactic complexity in L1 and L2; An fMRI study of Korean-English bilinguals. Brain Research, 1136(1), 178189.
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., Osterhout, L. (2014). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 17(2), 277293.
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Hershensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 367382.
Tanner, D., & van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289301.
Tokowicz, N., & Macwhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 173204.
Tsimpli, I.-M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from wh- interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215242.
Tsimpli, I.-M., & Sorace, A. (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T., & Zaller, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, BUCLD 30 (pp. 653664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
van Gompel, R. (2013). Sentence processing. Current issues in the psychology of language. Hove: Psychology Press.
Weber, K., & Lavric, A. (2008). Syntactic anomaly elicits a lexico-semantic (N400) ERP effect in the second language but not the first. Psychophysiology, 45, 920925.
Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(3), 231256.
Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 12721288.
Wilson, F. (2009). Processing at the syntax–discourse interface in second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y.-K. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105133.
Zawiszewski, A., Gutiérrez, E., Fernández, B., & Laka, I. (2011). Language distance and non-native syntactic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 14(3), 400411.