Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:15:09.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Restructuring

from Part I - Types and Mechanisms of Syntactic Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Ian Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, E. 2013. ‘Survey of Chinese historical syntax’, Language and Linguistics Compass 7(1): 3977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. 1986. ‘Reconsidering the history of like’, Journal of Linguistics 22: 375409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H. 1973. ‘Abductive and deductive change’, Language 48: 765–94.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. 1986. ‘A note on Old English impersonals’, Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejar, S. 2002. ‘Movement, morphology and learnability’, in Lightfoot, D. W. (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford University Press, pp. 307–25.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. 1988. ‘Psych-verbs and theta theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(3): 291352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, H. and Troberg, M. 2013. ‘Changes at the syntax-semantics interface: From Late Latin to Modern French’, paper presented at DiGS15, University of Ottawa. https://sites.google.com/site/heathersusanburnett.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. 2004. ‘Toward a cartography of subject positions’, in Rizzi, L. (ed.), The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 2. Oxford University of Press, pp. 115–65.Google Scholar
Carlson, A. 1976. ‘A diachronic treatment of English quantifiers’, unpublished MA thesis, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. (eds.) 2010. Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 6. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, D. 1990. ‘The OE impersonals revived’, in Adamson, S., Law, V., Vincent, N. and Wright, S. (eds.), Papers from the Fifth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 111–40.Google Scholar
Dikken, M. 2003. ‘On the syntax of locative and directional adpositional phrases’, MS, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Djamouri, R. and Paul, W. 2009. ‘Verb-to-preposition reanalysis in Chinese’, in Crisma, P. and Longobardi, G. (eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory. Oxford University Press, pp. 194211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, M. 2014. ‘Directional out of in the history of English: Grammaticalization and reanalysis’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(2): 83126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1966. ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 73113.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. C. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1909–49. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vols. 1–7. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1968. ‘Tense and mood in Indo-European syntax’, Foundations of Language 4: 3057.Google Scholar
Klima, E. 1964. ‘Relatedness between grammatical systems’, Language 40: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. 1977. ‘Syntactic reanalysis’, in Li, C. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 57139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, A. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N. and Thompson, S. 1974. ‘An explanation of word order change SVO > SOV’, Foundations of Language 12: 201–14.Google Scholar
Li, Y. H. A. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (ed.) 2002. Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, G. 2001. ‘Formal syntax, diachronic Minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 275302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, C. 1973. ‘Serial verbs in transition’, Studies in African Linguistics 4: 269–96.Google Scholar
Lord, C. 1976. ‘Evidence for syntactic reanalysis: From verb to complementizer in Kwa’, in Steever, S., Walker, C. and Mufwene, S. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 179–91.Google Scholar
Lord, C. 1993. Historical change in serial verb constructions (Typological Studies in Language no. 26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. 2001. ‘Le prefixe a-/ad- en moyen français’, Romania 119: 289322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shannessy, C. 2013. ‘The role of multiple sources in the formation of an innovative auxiliary category in Light Warlpiri, a new Australian mixed language’, Language 89: 328–53.Google Scholar
Peyraube, A. 1985. ‘Les structures en ‘ba’ en chinois medieval et moderne’, Cahiers de linguistique Asie Oriental 14: 193213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, A. 1996. ‘Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax’, in Huang, C.-T. J. and Li, Y.-H. (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 161213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemsdijk, H. and Huybregts, M. A. C. 2001. ‘Location and locality’, in van Oostendorp, M. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (eds.), Progress in grammar. Roccade: Amsterdam and Utrecht, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. G. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. G. and Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalisation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, C. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. 2004. ‘Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP’, in Svenonius, P. (ed.), Nordlyd 32: Special issue on Slavic prefixes. Tromsø: CASTL, pp. 205–53.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. and Kaufman, T. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. 1969. ‘Toward a grammar of syntactic change’, Lingua 23: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Gaaf, W. 1904. The transition from the impersonal to the personal construction in Middle English. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, T. 1975. ‘An explanation of drift’, in Li, C. N. (ed.), Word order and word order change. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, pp. 269305.Google Scholar
Visser, F. Th. 1963–73. An historical syntax of the English language, vols. 1–3b. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wang, L. 1958. Hanyu shi gao (zhong) [A draft history of Chinese (Part II)]. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Whitman, J. 2000. ‘Relabelling’, in Pintzuk, S., Toulas, G. and Warner, A. (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms. Oxford University Press, pp. 220–38.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×