Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:40:08.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Imperfect Transmission and Discontinuity

from Part V - Explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Ian Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Casti, J. 1994. Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. [1957] 2002. Syntactic structures, 2nd edn. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clark, R. 1992. ‘The selection of syntactic knowledge’, Language Acquisition 2: 83149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. E. 1999. ‘Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting’, Linguistic Inquiry 30: 2767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellegård, A. 1954. The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. 1998. ‘Unambiguous triggers’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, C. 1940. ‘On the development of the structural use of word-order in Modern English’, Language 16: 199208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. and Wexler, K. 1994. ‘Triggers’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 407–54.Google Scholar
Haeberli, E. 2002a. ‘Inflectional morphology and the loss of verb second in English’, in Lightfoot, D. W. (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford University Press, pp. 88106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, E. 2002b. ‘Observations on the loss of verb second in the history of English’, in Zwart, C. J.-W. and Abraham, W. (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on comparative Germanic syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 245–72.Google Scholar
Heycock, C., Sorace, A., Hansen, Z. S., Wilson, F. and Vikner, S. 2012. ‘Detecting the late stages of syntactic change: The loss of V-to-T in Faroese’, Language 88: 558600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, W. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Royal Academy of Sciences of Berlin [Linguistic variability and intellectual development, trans. Buck, G. C. and Raven, F. A. 1971. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press].Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. 1995. At home in the Universe: The search for laws of self-organisation and complexity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. 2002. ‘Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English’, in Minkova, D. and Stockwell, R. (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language: A millennial perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 325–54.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1968. ‘Linguistic universals and linguistic change’, in Bach, E. and Harms, R. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt. Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. 1989. ‘Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change’, Language Variation and Change 1: 199244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A. 1994. ‘Morphosyntactic variation’, in Beals, K. et al. (eds.), Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on variation and linguistic theory. Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 180201.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. and Santorini, B. 2013. ‘What a parsed corpus is and how to use it’, paper presented at LSA Summer Institute Workshop on diachronic syntax, www.ling.upenn.edu/~kroch/lsa13ws.html.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 2003. ‘Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992’, in Facchinetti, R., Krug, M. and Palmer, F. (eds.), Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 223–40.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1995. ‘Grammars for people’, Journal of Linguistics 31: 393–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 2011. ‘Multilingualism everywhere’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14: 162–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, G. 2001. ‘Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 275302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. 2009. ‘What else happened to English? A brief for the Celtic hypothesis’, English Language and Linguistics 13: 163–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. 2011. ‘Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14: 121–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchener, W. G. and Nowak, M. A. 2004. ‘Chaos and language’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 271: 701–04.Google ScholarPubMed
Narayanan, H. and Niyogi, P. 2013. ‘Language evolution, coalescent processes, and the consensus problem on a social network’, unpublished MS available at http://faculty.washington.edu/harin/LangEvol.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niyogi, P. 2006. The computational nature of language learning and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. 1995. ‘The logical problem of language change’, MIT AI Memo no. 1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. 1997. ‘A dynamical systems model of language change’, Complex Systems 11: 161204.Google Scholar
O’Neil, W. 1978. ‘The evolution of the Germanic inflectional systems: A study in the causes of language change’, Orbis 27: 248–85.Google Scholar
Paul, H. 1877. ‘Die Vocale der Flexions- und Ableitungssilben in den ältesten germanischen Dialecten’, Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 4: 314475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalisation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, R. 1989. Structural stability and morphogenesis: An outline of a general theory of models. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2002. Sociolinguistic variation and change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, A. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, S. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, G. 2012. ‘Against inertia’, Lingua 122: 891901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, J. Forthcoming. ‘Extraposition is disappearing’, Language.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. and Herzog, M. 1968. ‘Empirical foundations for a theory of language change’, in Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 95189.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×