Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-x2fkq Total loading time: 1.139 Render date: 2022-12-01T11:28:50.404Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

12 - Evolutionary Perspectives on Male Sexual Offending

from Part II - Applications to Health, Law, and Pornography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Oakland University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

Evolutionary psychology has been suggested to be a promising method to explain the incidence of sexual offending. We identify and discuss three major theoretical approaches to the explanation of sexual offending (specifically male rape). First, we discuss selectionist approaches, which position rape as a distinct outcome of evolutionary processes relating to mating and reproduction, either as a direct adaptation or an evolutionarily related by-product. Second, we discuss evolutionary-developmental approaches which discuss rape in relation to similar evolutionary functions (e.g. mating and reproduction) but with an emphasis on how rape develops over the lifespan. Third, we discuss Malamuth’s confluence model, which considers rape to be an outcome of a range of psychological and situational variables which fall on two broad explanatory pathways (hostile masculinity and sexual promiscuity). We suggest that while these perspectives all have clear merit, they generally lack specificity in relation to causal mechanisms and neglect proximate-level (immediate) explanations. We suggest a possible alternative approach to be one which applies evolutionary theory to the underlying psychological mechanisms which constitute rape directly, which we illustrate through the example of the integration of evolutionary accounts of emotion to the explanation of problematic sexual interests.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apostolou, M. (2013). The evolution of rape: The fitness benefits and costs of a forced-sex mating strategy in an evolutionary context. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), 484490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babchishin, K., Seto, M. C., Sariaslan, A., Lichtenstein, P., Fazel, S., & Långström, N. (2017). Parental and perinatal risk factors for sexual offending in men: A nationwide case-control study. Psychological Medicine, 47, 305315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Chen, J., & Zwald, M. (2020). Chronic diseases, health conditions, and other impacts associated with rape victimization of US women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519900335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, D., Lightman, S. L., & Pariante, C. M. (2014). The interface of stress and the HPA axis in behavioral phenotypes of mental illness. In Pariante, C. M. & Lapiz-Bluhm, M. D. (Eds.), Behavioural neurobiology of stress-related disorders. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Blake, E., & Gannon, T. A. (2014). Investigating the implicit theories of rape-prone men using an interpretive bias task: Implicit theories of rape-prone men. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(1), 4053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, D. J. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bumby, K., & Hansen, D. (1997). Intimacy deficits, fear of intimacy, and loneliness among sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(3), 315331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camilleri, J. A. (2012). Evolutionary psychological perspectives on sexual offending: From etiology to intervention. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Violence, Homicide, and War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49(5), 13451365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dean, K. E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 449455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(1), 167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2018). Evolutionary psychopathology: A unified approach. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011). The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(7), 15621592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M., Hinnant, J. B., Ellis, B. J., & El-Sheikh, M. (2012). Adaptive patterns of stress responsivity: A preliminary investigation. Developmental Psychology, 48(3), 775790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2015). Evolutionary criminology: Towards a comprehensive explanation of crime. Amsterdam: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, L. (1991). A synthesized (biosocial) theory of rape. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 631642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, L. (2005). A theory explaining biological correlates of criminality. European Journal of Criminology, 2(3), 287315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J., & Del Giudice, M. (2014). Beyond allostatic load: Rethinking the role of stress in regulating human development. Development and Psychopathology, 26(1), 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueredo, A. J., Sales, B. D., Russell, K. P., Becker, J. V., & Kaplan, M. (2000). A Brunswikian evolutionary–developmental theory of adolescent sex offending. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 309329.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., … & Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26(2), 243275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galván, A. (2010). Adolescent development of the reward system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 6.Google ScholarPubMed
Galván, A. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to rewards. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 8893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladden, P. R., Sisco, M., & Figueredo, A. J. (2008). Sexual coercion and life-history strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(5), 319326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., & Camilleri, J. A. (2008). Proximate and ultimate explanations are required for a comprehensive understanding of partner rape. Aggression and violent behavior, 13, 13591789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunst, E., Watson, J., Desmet, M., & Willemsen, J. (2017). Affect regulation as a factor in sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior 37, 210219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoon, P. W., Wincze, J. P., & Hoon, E. F. (1977). A test of reciprocal inhibition: Are anxiety and sexual arousal in women mutually inhibitory? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(1), 6574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, O. D., & Goldsmith, T. H. (2005). Law and behavioral biology. Columbia Law Review, 105(2), 405502.Google Scholar
Kalmus, E., & Beech, A. R. (2005). Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(2), 193217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanin, E. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14(3), 219231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjellgren, C., Priebe, G., Svedin, C. G., & Långström, N. (2010). Sexually coercive behavior in male youth: Population survey of general and specific risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior 39, 11611169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Myles, S. (2010). How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(2), 137148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalumiére, M. L., Fairweather, A., Harrris, G. T., Suschinsky, K. D., & Seto, M. C. (2017). Genital responses to rape vignettes among young men: The influence of mood and directed attention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 685695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalumiére, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Maiese, M. (2011). Embodiment, emotion, and cognition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiese, M. (2016). Embodied selves and divided minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 953962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malamuth, N. M. (1996). The confluence model of sexual aggression: feminist and evolutionary perspectives. In Buss, D. M. & Malamuth, N. M. (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 269295). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malamuth, N. M., & Hald, G. M. (2016). The confluence mediational model of sexual aggression. In Beech, A. R. & Ward, T. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending (pp. 5371). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamuth, N. M., Heavey, C. L., & Linz, D. (1993). Predicting men’s antisocial behavior against women: The interaction model of sexual aggression. In Hall, G. C. N., Hirschman, R., Graham, J. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 6397). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Malamuth, N. M., & Malamuth, E. Z. (1999). Integrating multiple levels of scientific analysis and the confluence model of sexual coercers. Jurimetrics, 39(2), 157180.Google Scholar
Malamuth, N. M., Sackloskie, R., Koss, M., & Tanaka, J. (1991). The characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, B. (2016). Feminist framework plus: Knitting feminist theories of rape etiology into a comprehensive model. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17(3), 314329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Starratt, V. G. (2008). Why do men rape? An evolutionary psychological perspective. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 8697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (Eds.) (2009). Sexual coercion in primates and humans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polaschek, D. L. L. (2019). The psychology of desistance. In Polaschek, D. L. L., Day, A., & Hollin, C. R. (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of correctional psychology (pp. 316336). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polaschek, D., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(4), 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polaschek, D., Ward, T., & Hudson, S. M. (1997). Rape and rapists: Theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(2), 117144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pool, E., Sennwald, V., Delplanque, S., Tobias, B., & Sander, D. (2016). Measuring wanting and liking from animals to humans: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 63, 124142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherer, K. R., & Moors, A. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 719745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seto, M. C., & Lalumiére, M. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 526575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shennan, S. (2002). Genes, memes, and human history. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
Shields, W. M., & Shields, L. M. (1983). Forcible rape: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4(3), 115136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smid, W. J., & Wever, E. C. (2016). Incentive theory of sexual motivation. The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending (pp. 141164). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smid, W. J., & Wever, E. C. (2019). Mixed emotions: An incentive motivational model of sexual deviance. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(7), 731764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216224.Google ScholarPubMed
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1999). The biology of human rape. Jurimetrics, 39(2), 137155.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 363421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1992). The evolutionary psychology of men’s coercive sexuality. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(2), 363421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, 3rd ed. (pp. 114137). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A. E. (2003). The association between offender socio-economic status and victim–offender relationship in rape offences – revised. Sexualities, Evolution and Gender, 5(2), 103105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. (2000). Sexual offenders’ cognitive distortions as implicit theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359–1789(98)00036-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. (2014). The explanation of sexual offending: From single factor theories to integrative pluralism. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20(2), 130141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T., Beech, A. R., & Polaschek, D. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ward, T., & Carter, E. (2019). The classification of offending and crime related problems: A functional perspective. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 25(6), 542560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T., & Siegert, R. (2002). Rape and evolutionary psychology: A critique of Thornhill and Palmer’s theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(2), 145168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 5973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, D. (1996). Sequential dependences in emotional experience and behavior. In Kavanaugh, R. D., Zimmerberg, B., & Fein, S. (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 243272). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Zillmann, D., Bryant, J., Comiksy, P. W., & Medoff, N. J. (1981). Excitation and hedonic valence in the effect of erotica on motivated intermale aggression. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 233252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×