Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-zgpz2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-23T19:26:24.068Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

28 - Rhetorics, Discourse and Populist Politics

from Part VI - Discourses, Publics and Mediatization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

Anna De Fina
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Although the notion of “populism” goes back to Roman/Greek antiquity, the twenty-first century has seen a surge in both the success of such movements and academic interest in them, especially their rhetorics, discourse and politics. In engaging with populism, discourse studies has interfaced with political and social sciences and struggled to find a conceptually sound and empirically grounded definition, while avoiding an overly broad use of the term. In this, the field is far from homogenous, but it offers many insightful approaches to studying contemporary populist politics. A specific point of interest (and contention) is the interrelationships among rhetorical strategies, discourse-analytical concepts relating populism to hegemony or society (such as interdiscursivity, recontextualization and normalization) and the agenda of populist politics. Behind this looms the larger question of the status of populism itself. While some scholars regard populism as an ideology, others call it a movement or syndrome. While some argue that it is both a form and a content, others maintain that it is only a style or, rather, that it combines specific forms with specific contents. In terms of evaluation, some argue that (at least contemporary) populism is a danger to democracy or, more specifically, to liberal democracy, while others see it as an integral part of any democracy or even a positive force. Central among the traits identified in populist politics is its divisiveness and appeal to “the people”: It divides society into two homogenous and antagonistic camps, the “pure people” versus the “corrupt elite.” At the same time, it is antipluralist in claiming that it alone represents the true will of the people, claiming to raise that will over all else. This often links to a larger opposition constructed by populist politics: “national” versus “international” interests. Beyond such commonalities, populist politics, their rhetorics and discourse differ strikingly across the globe and across political affiliations. Empirical discourse studies engage with the specifics of the rhetorics employed by populist politics and how they relate to discourses within the respective contexts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

This edited volume’s insightful contributions on the forms and effects of populism across the globe remain relevant to this day.

Moffitt’s book makes a strong case for taking a close look at the performative dimension of populism, in particular the performances of its leaders in relation to crises and the media.

This aptly named introduction manages to give a comprehensive overview of populism across time and space in all its varied forms, providing a concise framework for comparative studies of populism.

This concise work, first published in 2016 and updated a year later, provides an accessible and passionate discussion of contemporary populism, focusing on its inner logic and threat to democracy.

This special issue covers right-wing populism in Europe and the United States and brings together varied approaches from applied linguistics and social sciences.

Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.) (2002). Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, J. W. (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.) (2017a). Special Issue: Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics and Discourse beyond “Orbanism” and “Trumpism.Journal of Language and Politics 16(4).

References

Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J. and de Vreese, C. (eds.) (2017). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge.
Angouri, J. and Wodak, R. (2014). They Became Big in the Shadow of the Crisis: The Greek Success Story and the Rise of the Far Right. Discourse & Society 25(4): 540–65.
Arditi, B. (2007). Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Aslanidis, P. and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2016). Dealing with Populists in Government: The SYRIZA-ANEL Coalition in Greece. Democratization 23(6): 1077–91.
Barr, R. (2009). Populists, Outsiders and Anti-establishment Politics. Party Politics 15(1): 2948.
Bos, L., Sheets, P. and Boomgaarden, H. G. (2018). The Role of Implicit Attitudes in Populist Radical Right Support. Political Psychology 39(1): 6987.
Bos, L., van der Brug, W. and de Vreese, C. H. (2013). An Experimental Test of the Impact of Style and Rhetoric on the Perception of Right-Wing Populist and Mainstream Party Leaders. Acta Politica 48(2): 192208.
Boukala, S. (2018). False Reasoning and Argumentation in the Twitter Discourse of the Prime Minister of Israel. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6(1): 5878.
Boukala, S. and Dimitrakopoulou, D. (2015). The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek Election and Referendum Campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies 14(1): 3955.
Brown, G. (1997). Deliberation and Its Discontents: H. Ross Perot’s Antipolitical Populism. In Schedler, A. (ed.) The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics. 115–48.
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why Populism? Theory and Society 46(5): 357–85.
Burns, S., Eberhardt, L. and Merolla, J. L. (2013). What Is the Difference between a Hockey Mom and a Pit Bull? Presentations of Palin and Gender Stereotypes in the 2008 Presidential Election. Political Research Quarterly 66(3): 687701.
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies 4(1): 216.
Castanho, S. B., Vegetti, F. and Littvay, L. (2017). The Elite Is Up to Something: Exploring the Relation between Populism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Swiss Political Science Review 23(4): 423–43.
Chilton, P. (2017). “The People” in Populist Discourse: Using Neuro-cognitive Linguistics to Understand Political Meanings. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 582–94.
Christofferson, T. (2003). The French Elections of 2002: The Issue of Insecurity and the Le Pen Effect. Acta Politica 38(2): 109–23.
Colombo, M. (2012). Discourse and Politics of Migration in Italy: The Production and Reproduction of Ethnic Dominance and Exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics 12(2): 157–79.
Csigó, P. and Merkovity, N. (2017). Hungary: Home of Empty Populism. In Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J. and de Vreese, C. (eds.) Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. 299310.
Curato, N. (2016). Flirting with Authoritarian Fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the New Terms of Philippine Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47(1): 142–53.
De la Torre, C. (2014). Populism in Latin American Politics. In Woods, D. and Wejnert, B. (eds.) The Many Faces of Populism: Current Perspectives. Bingley: Emerald. 79100.
Dinçşahin, Ş. (2012). A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party’s Populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Government and Opposition 47(4): 618–40.
Dornbusch, R. and Edwards, S. (1992). The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ekström, M., Patrona, M. and Thornborrow, J. (2018). Right-Wing Populism and the Dynamics of Style: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective on Mediated Political Performances. Palgrave Communications 4(83). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0132-6.
Engel, J. and Wodak, R. (2013). “Calculated Ambivalence” and Holocaust Denial in Austria. In Wodak, R. and Richardson, J. E. (eds.) Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text. London: Routledge. 7396.
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N. and Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue. Information, Communication & Society 20(9).
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Filc, D. (2010). The Political Right in Israel: Different Faces of Jewish Populism. London: Routledge.
Filc, D. (2015). Latin American Inclusive and European Exclusionary Populism: Colonialism as an Explanation. Journal of Political Ideologies 20(3): 263–83.
Gidron, N. and Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda. Harvard, MA: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs.
Goodwyn, L. (1976). Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hafez, F. (2017). Debating the 2015 Islam law in Austrian Parliament: Between Legal Recognition and Islamophobic Populism. Discourse & Society 28(4): 392412.
Hameleers, M., Bos, L. and de Vreese, C. H. (2017). The Appeal of Media Populism: The Media Preferences of Citizens with Populist Attitudes. Mass Communication & Society 20(4): 481504.
Hatakka, N., Niemi, M. K. and Välimäki, M. (2017). Confrontational yet Submissive: Calculated Ambivalence and Populist Parties’ Strategies of Responding to Racism Accusations in the Media. Discourse & Society 28(3): 262–80.
Hofstadter, R. ([1964]2008). The Paranoid Style in American Politics. In The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. New York: Vintage Books.
Ionescu, G. and Gellner, E. (eds.) (1969). Populism, Its Meaning and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Kavada, A. (2018). Editorial: Media and the “Populist Moment.” Media, Culture & Society. Published online: doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772144.
Keane, J. (2013). Democracy and Media Decadence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kellner, D. (2017). American Horror Show: Election 2016 and the Ascent of Donald J. Trump. Rotterdam: Sense.
Krämer, B. (2017). Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism. Information, Communication & Society 20(9).
Krastev, I. (2012). The Populist Moment. EUROZINE, September, 18. www.eurozine.com/the-populist-moment/.
Kress, G. R. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London/New York: Oxford University Press.
Krzyżanowski, M. (2012). Right-Wing Populism, Opportunism and Political Catholicism: On Recent Rhetorics and Political Communication of Polish PiS (Law and Justice) Party. In Pelinka, A. and Haller, B. (eds.) Populismus: Herausforderung oder Gefahr für die Demokratie? Vienna: New Academic Press. 111–26.
Krzyżanowski, M. and Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 566–81.
Kuzminski, A. (2008). Fixing the System: A History of Populism, Ancient and Modern. New York: Bloomsbury.
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Lakoff, R. T. (2017). The Hollow Man: Donald Trump, Populism, and Post-Truth Politics. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 595606.
Leach, M., Stokes, G. and Ward, I. (2000). The Rise and Fall of One Nation. Queensland: University of Queensland Press.
Machin, D. and Richardson, J. E. (2012). Discourses of Unity and Purpose in the Sounds of Fascist Music: A Multimodal Approach. Critical Discourse Studies 9(4): 329–45.
Martinéz-Torres, M. E. and Rosset, P. M. (2010). La Vía Campesina: The Birth and Evolution of a Transnational Social Movement. Journal of Peasant Studies 37(1): 149–75.
Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the Media. In Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D. (eds.) Twenty-First Century Populism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 4964.
McCabe, J. (2012). States of Confusion: Sarah Palin and the Politics of US Mothering. Feminist Media Studies 12(1): 149–53.
Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop Polyvocality: Internet Memes, Public Participation, and the Occupy Wall Street Movement. International Journal of Communication 7: 2357–90.
Moffitt, B. (2015). How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism. Government and Opposition 50(2): 189217.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Moffitt, B. and Tormey, S. (2013). Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies 62(2): 381–97.
Montgomery, M. (2017). Post-Truth Politics? Authenticity, Populism and the Electoral Discourses of Donald Trump. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 619–39.
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4): 542–53.
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, J. W. (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Musolff, A. (2018). Nations as Persons: Collective Identities in Conflict. In Bös, B., Kleinke, S., Mollin, S. and Hernández, N. (eds.) The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal, Group and Collective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 249–66.
Nolan, D. and Brooks, S. (2015). The Problems of Populism: Celebrity Politics and Citizenship. Communication Research and Practice 1(4): 349–61.
Ostiguy, P. (2009). The High–Low Political Divide: Rethinking Populism and Anti-Populism. Political Concepts: Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series 35.
Pappas, T. (2014). Populism and Crisis Politics in Greece. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pels, D. (2011). The New National Individualism: Populism Is Here to Stay. In Meijers, E. (ed.) Populism in Europe. Vienna/Brussels: PlanetVerlag/GEF.
Postill, J. (2018). Populism and Social Media: A Global Perspective. Media, Culture & Society. Published online: doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772186.
Reisigl, M. (2005). Oppositioneller und regierender Rechtspopulismus: Rhetorische Strategien und diskursive Dynamiken in der Demokratie. In Fröhlich-Steffen, S. and Rensmann, L. (eds.) Populisten an der Macht. Populistische Regierungsparteien in West- und Osteuropa. Wien: Braumüller. 5168.
Reisigl, M. (2012). Rechtspopulistische und faschistische Rhetorik: ein Vergleich. Totalitarismus und Demokratie 9: 303–23.
Rheindorf, M. (2019). Disciplining the Unwilling. Normalisation of (Demands for) Punitive Measures against Immigrants in Austrian Populist Discourse. In Kranert, M. and Horan, G. (eds.) Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 179208.
Rheindorf, M. and Wodak, R. (2017). Borders, Fences, and Limits: Protecting Austria from Refugees. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 1538.
Rheindorf, M. and Wodak, R. (2019). “Austria First” Revisited: A Diachronic Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Gender and Body Politics of the Extreme Right. Patterns of Prejudice 53(3): 302–20.
Richardson, J. E. (2013). Ploughing the Same Furrow? Continuity and Change on Britain’s Extreme-Right Fringe. In Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.) Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury. 105–20.
Richardson, J. E. and Colombo, M. (2013). Continuity and Change in Anti-immigrant Discourse in Italy: An Analysis of the Visual Propaganda of the Lega Nord. Journal of Language and Politics 12(2): 180202.
Roberts, K. M. (2007). Latin America’s Populist Revival. SAIS Review 28(1): 315.
Ruzza, C. and Balbo, L. (2013). Italian Populism and the Trajectories of Two Leaders: Silvio Berlusconi and Umberto Bossi. In Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.) Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury. 163–76.
Ruzza, C. and Pejovic, M. (2019). Populism at Work: The Language of the Brexiteers and the European Union. Critical Discourse Studies 16(4): 432–48.
Rydgren, J. (2017). Radical Right-Wing Parties in Europe: What’s Populism Got to Do with It? Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 485–96.
Sauer, B., Krasteva, A. and Saarinen, A. (2017). Post-Democracy, Party Politics and Right-Wing Populist Communication. In Pajnik, M. and Sauer, B. (eds.) Populism and the Web. London: Routledge. 1435.
Savage, R. (2013). From McCarthyism to the Tea Party: Interpreting Anti-Leftist Forms of US Populism in Comparative Perspective. New Political Science 34(4): 564–84.
Schoor, C. (2017). In the Theater of Political Style: Touches of Populism, Pluralism and Elitism in Speeches of Politicians. Discourse & Society 28(6): 657–76.
Stanley, B. (2008). The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies 13(1): 95110.
Stavrakakis, Y. and Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies 19(2): 119–42.
Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., Kioupkiolis, A. and Siomos, T. (2017). Extreme Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association. Critical Discourse Studies 14(4): 420–39.
Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics. In Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmilla. 6280.
Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.) (2009). The European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vollmer, B. and Karakayali, S. (2017). The Volatility of the Discourse on Refugees in Germany. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 118–39.
Ware, A. (2002). The United States: Populism as Political Strategy. In Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 101–19.
Weber, M. ([1924]1997). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Wiles, P. (1969). A Syndrome, Not a Doctrine: Some Elementary Theses on Populism. In Ionescu, G. and Gellner, E. (eds.) Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics. London: Weinfeld & Nicolson. 197211.
Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, R. (2017). The “Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People”: Who’s Who? Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 551–65.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., Liebhart, K., Hirsch, A., Mitten, R. and Unger, J. W. (2009). The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R. and Forchtner, B. (2014). Embattled Vienna 1683/2010: Right-Wing Populism, Collective Memory and the Fictionalisation of Politics. Visual Communication 13(2): 231–55.
Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.) (2013). Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond “Orbanism” and “Trumpism.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 471–84.
Wodak, R. and Pelinka, A. (eds.) (2009). The Haider Phenomenon in Austria. New Brunswick/London: Transaction.
Zappettini, F. and Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.) (2019). Special Issue: The Critical Juncture of Brexit in Media & Political Discourses: From National-Populist Imaginary to Cross-National Social and Political Crisis. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×