It is often assumed that an open-ended limitation to copyright, such as the fair use defense, is alien to the civil law tradition as it gives too much power to judges to design the contours of copyright law on a case-by-case basis. However, the increasing use of fundamental rights in copyright disputes in many civil law countries is challenging that assumption, raising the question of whether a sort of “fair use” limitation is not already being wielded through the weighing of interests and use of the proportionality test, both of which are required when the judiciary is applying fundamental rights. It will be shown in this chapter that even in France, traditionally considered an exemplar of civil law reasoning in copyright matters, a recent and highly commented-upon decision of the French Supreme Court concerning the balancing of freedom of artistic expression with copyright has paved the way for a judicial in concreto assessment of copyright limitations. This change in approach by the courts can be witnessed not only in France but also in many other civil law jurisdictions across Europe, and even by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), thus strengthening the argument for the introduction of an open clause for limitations in EU copyright law.