Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-hg4f7 Total loading time: 1.477 Render date: 2022-06-26T15:19:14.859Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

10 - Clinical Interviewing

from Part II - Specific Clinical Assessment Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

Martin Sellbom
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Julie A. Suhr
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get access

Summary

Clinical interviewing is a flexible method for gathering assessment information and initiating psychotherapy. Clinical interviews can be used to establish therapeutic relationships, provide role inductions for psychotherapy, gather assessment information, develop case formulations/treatment plans, and for implementing therapeutic interventions. When used for assessment or intake purposes, clinical interviews focus on specific content, such as psychodiagnosis, mental status, and suicide risk. Although central to psychodiagnostic assessment, interview reliability and validity can be adversely affected by noncredible client responding (e.g., the over- or underreporting of symptoms). To address noncredible client responding, clinicians need to (1) be aware of the potential for inaccurate reporting, (2) adopt a “scientific mindedness” approach, (3) manage their countertransference, (4) use specific questioning or interpersonal strategies, and (5) triangulate data by using information from multiple sources. Undoubtedly, technology and other forces may change how future clinicians conduct clinical interviews; however, it is likely that clinical interviews will remain foundational to psychological assessment and treatment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Counseling Association. (2014). The American Counseling Association code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
APA (American Psychological Association). (2010). Ethical principles for psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.
Bahorik, A. L., Newhill, C. E., Queen, C. C., & Eack, S. M. (2014). Under-reporting of drug use among individuals with schizophrenia: Prevalence and predictors. Psychological Medicine, 44(1), 6169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basterra, M. D., Trumbull, E., & Solano-Flores, G. (2011). Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edens, J. F., Kelley, S. E., Lilienfeld, S. O., Skeem, J. L., & Douglas, K. S. (2015). DSM-5 antisocial personality disorder: Predictive validity in a prison sample. Law and Human Behavior, 39(2), 123129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkind, D. (1964). Piaget’s semi-clinical interview and the study of spontaneous religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 4, 4047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2016). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, clinician version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frances, A. (2013). Essentials of psychiatric diagnosis: Responding to the challenge of DSM-5 (rev ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ganzini, L., Denneson, L. M., Press, N., Bair, M. J., Helmer, D. A., Poat, J., & Dobscha, S. K. (2013). Trust is the basis for effective suicide risk screening and assessment in veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(9), 12151221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D., & Rosenfeld, B. (2011). Evaluating the gold standard: A review and meta-analysis of the structured interview of reported symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 95107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Belfi, B. (2013). New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms. Assessment, 20(2), 210218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanley, T., & Reynolds, D. J. (2009). Counselling psychology and the internet: A review of the quantitative research into online outcomes and alliances within text-based therapy. Counselling Psychology Review, 24(2), 413.Google Scholar
Hays, P. A. (2016). Addressing cultural complexities in practice: Assessment, diagnosis, and therapy (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hormes, J. M., Gerhardstein, K. R., & Griffin, P. T. (2012). Under-reporting of alcohol and substance use versus other psychiatric symptoms in individuals living with HIV. AIDS Care, 24(4), 420423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, M. F. (2000). Some stories are better than others: Doing what works in brief therapy and managed care. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Jobes, D. A. (2016). Managing suicidal risk: A collaborative approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Joiner, T. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kroshus, E., Kubzansky, L. D., Goldman, R. E., & Austin, S. B. (2015). Norms, athletic identity, and concussion symptom under-reporting among male collegiate ice hockey players: A prospective cohort study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(1), 95103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1997). Making us crazy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Large, M. M., & Ryan, C. J. (2014). Suicide risk categorisation of psychiatric inpatients: What it might mean and why it is of no use. Australasian Psychiatry, 22(4), 390392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S. O., Smith, S. F., & Watts, A. L. (2013). Issues in diagnosis: Conceptual issues and controversies. In Craighead, W. E. & Miklowitz, D. J. (Eds.), Psychopathology: History, diagnosis, and empirical foundations (2nd ed., pp. 135). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., & Arntz, A. (2011). Inter‐rater reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM‐IV axis I disorders (SCID I) and axis II disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(1), 7579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work II. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 48, 48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richman, W. L., Weisband, S., Kiesler, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 754775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, R. (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Gillard, N. D. (2010). SIRS-2: Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Salamon, S., Santelmann, H., Franklin, J., & Baethge, C. (2018). Test-retest reliability of the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 230, 2833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellbom, M., & Hopwood, C. J. (2016). Evidence‐based assessment in the 21st century: Comments on the special series papers. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(4), 403409.Google Scholar
Shea, S. C. (1998). Psychiatric interviewing: The art of understanding (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553573. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers-Flanagan, J. (2016). Clinical interview. In Norcross, J. C., VandenBos, G. R., & Freedheim, D. K. (Eds.), APA handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 316). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sommers-Flanagan, J. (2018). Conversations about suicide: Strategies for detecting and assessing suicide risk. Journal of Health Service Psychology, 44, 3345.Google Scholar
Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (1998). Assessment and diagnosis of conduct disorder. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 189197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2017). Clinical interviewing (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Strub, R. L., & Black, F. W. (1977). The mental status exam in neurology. Philadelphia: Davis.Google Scholar
Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2016). Counseling the culturally diverse (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sue, S. (1998). In search of cultural competence in psychotherapy and counseling. American Psychologist, 53(4), 440448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suhr, J. A. (2015). Psychological assessment: A problem-solving approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Suhr, J. A., & Berry, D. T. R. (2017). The importance of assessing for validity of symptom report and performance in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Introduction to the special section on noncredible presentation in ADHD. Psychological Assessment, 29(12), 14271428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suhr, J. A., Cook, C., & Morgan, B. (2017). Assessing functional impairment in ADHD: Concerns for validity of self-report. Psychological Injury and Law, 10(2), 151160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(3), 189207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolin, D. F., Gilli Tolin, D. F., Gilliam, C., Wootton, B. M., Bowe, W., Bragdon, L. B. et al. (2018). Psychometric properties of a structured diagnostic interview for DSM-5 anxiety, mood, and obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. Assessment, 25(1), 313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vannoy, S. D., Andrews, B. K., Atkins, D. C., Dondanville, K. A., Young-McCaughan, S., & Peterson, A. L. (2017). Under reporting of suicide ideation in US Army population screening: An ongoing challenge. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(6), 723728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welfel, E. R. (2016). Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy: Standards, research, and emerging issues (6th ed.). Boston: Cengage.Google Scholar
Wiarda, N. R., McMinn, M. R., Peterson, M. A., & Gregor, J. A. (2014). Use of technology for note taking and therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 443446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widiger, T. A., & Edmundson, M. (2011). Diagnoses, dimensions, and DSM-5. In Barlow, D. H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 254278). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yalom, I. D. (2002). The gift of therapy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Zander, E., Willfors, C., Berggren, S., Coco, C., Holm, A., Jifält, I. et al. (2017). The interrater reliability of the autism diagnostic interview-revised (ADI-R) in clinical settings. Psychopathology, 50(3), 219227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×